I've been working on a small project trying to learn some basics, I'm trying to make a clone of space invaders. I'm not really experienced (which is why I'm doing this) and I've run into something I've never had a problem with before.
My problem is with loops, I've used basic loops but I'm using some nested loops now and it's giving me some problems. Here is the code that breaks my project
public void moveLevel(int l, ArrayList ms){
switch(l){
case 1:{
centerX = 60;
centerY = 35;
alienArray = ms;
moveRight = true;
while(moveRight == true){
x += 1;
}
}
case 2:{
}
}
}
I can show more code if anybody thinks it would help, but basically, this block gets the level number (l) passed to it as well as an array list which holds about 15 'alien' objects. The line 'x+=1' is what moves the aliens (the location of each alien is x).
This code is called from another function which is constantly called from a swing timer.
What is happening, is that when the code reaches this point, the program seems to freeze. I have a button on the JPanel that doesn't react, I have a hotkey to close the application which doesn't react, and exiting the application with the mouse does nothing (I've included a DefaultCloseOperation(EXIT_ON_CLOSE) in the JFrame which works without this while loop).
if I replace the word 'while' with 'if', like below the code works fine.
public void moveLevel(int l, ArrayList ms){
switch(l){
case 1:{
centerX = 60;
centerY = 35;
alienArray = ms;
moveRight = true;
if(moveRight == true){
x += 1;
}
}
case 2:{
}
}
}
I've also tried a do, while loop.
I have no idea what the problem is, I assume it's a logic error but it seems fairly straightforward to me. Again, if anybody would like to see the rest of the code I can post it. Otherwise, if anybody has any suggestions I would appreciate it. I'm open to specific advice or just general advice on code efficiency. Thanks
ANSWER
Okay I've gotten my code moving forward thanks to Ted Hopp, who commented below. Looks like an infinite loop was being executed within the case statement.
Here is my fix for any who are curious, I've included the function that calls the function from the original post.
public void move(int l, ArrayList ms){
level = l;
alienArray = ms;
moveLevel(level, alienArray);
centerX += horizontal;
centerY += vertical;
x += horizontal;
y += vertical;
if(moveRight == true){
horizontal = 1;
vertical = 0;
System.out.println(centerX);
}
else x -= 1;
}
public void moveLevel(int l, ArrayList ms){
switch(l){
case 1:{
alienArray = ms;
moveRight = true;
if(moveRight == true){
if (centerX > 300){
moveRight = false;
}
if(moveRight == false){
if(centerX < 100){
}
}
}
}
break;
case 2:{
}
}
}
This just basically moves all of the aliens to the right and stops so far, but I've moved past the original issue.
You have an infinite loop:
moveRight = true;
while(moveRight == true){
x += 1;
}
because moveRight enters the loop as true and will never become false by repeatedly executing x += 1;.
It looks like you're trying to get something to animate continuous motion to the right. However, this is not the way to do it because your loop won't let any other part of your code (including the rendering) to execute. Without knowing more about your code structure, it's hard to provide specific advice, but I suggest you read up on animation loops. There are lots of tutorial resources on the web on the subject. Look for things like java swing animation loop.
Also, it looks like you need a break; statement at the end of each case.
You loop, as in its current state, is infinite. You'll need to have a condition where your boolean variablemoveRight will be set to false.
Related
I'm making a 2d platformer in libgdx with box2d. The below is the update method for one of my enemies. It's an extension of the 'Enemy' class, which is what 'super.update' refers to. I want the enemy to run when the player is behind it or far away and to stop and shoot when the player is close to it and in front of it.
I try to achieve this by setting the speed (velocity.x) initially [depending on the enemy's direction], then setting whether or not it's shooting afterwards.
The problem I have at the moment is that the enemy doesn't run when the player is behind it. As you can see, I printed out a lot of strings to console to see when the velocity.x gets changed back to 0. According to the console, it happens in the last if/else pair of statements which are supposed to check how far away the player is and which direction the enemy is running. However, the console strings within those statements, the ones that say 'Shoot Left' or 'Shoot Right', don't get printed out. Despite this, the line that changes velocity.x must get run because the it's value changes according to the string output in the next line. The if statements at the top which check direction must get run as well because the console outputs within those statements get printed, and the output that says the velocity says the correct velocity (either 2 or -2).
What is going on? It seems like the IDE is running only one of the lines in the if statement. That's impossible so what am I missing here?
Thanks for any help.
public void update (float dt, Player player){
super.update(dt, player);
if (b2body.isActive()){
System.out.println(b2body.getPosition().x - player.b2body.getPosition().x);
System.out.println("After Enemy code: " + velocity.x);
if (getRunningRight()) {
System.out.println("Right");
velocity.x = 2;
}
else if (!getRunningRight()) {
System.out.println("Left");
velocity.x = -2;
}
System.out.println("After checking direction: " + velocity.x);
if ((b2body.getPosition().x - player.b2body.getPosition().x <= 2 &&
b2body.getPosition().x - player.b2body.getPosition().x >= 0) && !getRunningRight()){
velocity.x = 0;
System.out.println("Shoot left");
}
else if ((b2body.getPosition().x - player.b2body.getPosition().x >= -2 &&
b2body.getPosition().x - player.b2body.getPosition().x < 0) && getRunningRight()){
System.out.println("Shoot right");
velocity.x = 0;
}
System.out.println("After shooting: " + velocity.x);
}
}
In your first set of ifs, you evaluate getRunningRight() after you have already determined that it will be false (by the initial if failing), so there is no need to evaluate it again.
If you think you are doing the same thing in the second block, you are not; the expression in the inner if is not the opposite of the first one. That is, (A && B) && C is not the opposite of (!A && !B) && !C. Thus, it is possible for both expressions to be false.
I am new in this page, it hope get to some help, basically I am doing a minesweeper game on Java but it have a problem with a function: discover the region with no mines and no numbers like in the game on windows, when you click in one place and all withe cells appear. I tried make recursive but I can't, some help?
Sorry for the code, the original is in spanish but i tried make a pseudocode:
Matriz = multidimensional Array (the minesweeper)
min and max returns the index min and max to iterate (8 sorroud cells)
private void discoverWitheCell(int x, int y) {
if(matriz[x][y].getdiscovered() == false){
matriz[x][y].setDiscovered(true);
}
else{
if(matriz[x][y].getNumberOfMinesArround() == 0){
for(int i=min(x);i<max(x);i++)
for(int j=min(y);j<max(y);j++)
discoverWhiteCell(i,j);
}
}
}
There's not a lot of code here but I feel like you're coming at it backwards.
Sorry, I'm not a Java speaker so I'm guessing at some of the syntax. Note that this can go out of bounds--personally, I would add a layer of empty cells around my map so I never need to concern myself with bounds checking.
private void ClickSquare(int x, int y)
{
// Did the user click an already exposed square? If so, ignore
if (matriz[x][y].getDiscovered()) return;
matriz[x][y].SetDiscovered(true);
if (matriz[x][y].getNumberOfMinesAround != 0) return;
// If empty, click all the neighbors
for (int xloop = x - 1; xloop <= x + 1; xloop++)
for (int yloop = y - 1; yloop <= y + 1; yloop++)
ClickSquare(xloop, yloop);
}
I believe you have the discovered test messed up and your version appears to be able to go into infinite (until the stack overflows) recursion as if the neighbor is also zero it will come back to the original cell. My version stops this recursion by only processing a cell if it hasn't already been processed.
I am trying to implement a chess game with alpha beta pruning. The following is almost working, but it returns wrong moves.
For example, the following can occur.
White (user) to move, white king position - a1 / Black (computer), black king position - h1
White moves its king from a1 - a2, then black return the move g2 - g1???
It appears that the computer returns a move for the wrong node (board representation), as if the best evaluation of a given board position is not being propagated all the way back up the tree. So in one of the simulated positions explored, the computer "imagines" its king moving to g2 and then returns the move to be made from this position, not realising that this position is a simulated position and not the representation of the actual board (the root node?).
How can I correct the code to make the computer return a move for the actual board representation and not one of the simulations by mistake?
Thank you.
Initial call alphaBeta(3, ChessEngine.invertBoard(ChessEngine.board), -10000, 10000, true);
private static int alphaBetaEvaluate = 0;
private static int alphaBetaSelectedSquare = 0;
private static int alphaBetaMoveToSquare = 0;
public static int alphaBeta(int depth, char[] board, int alpha, int beta, boolean maxPlayer) {
//create a copy of the board
char[] boardCopy = board.clone();
//if terminal state has not been met, keep searching
if (maxPlayer == true && depth > 0) {
//for all of the moves that max can make
for (int i = 0; i < board.length; i++) {
for (int move : ChessEngine.getValidMoves(i, boardCopy)) {
//make the move
boardCopy[move] = boardCopy[i];
boardCopy[i] = '.';
alphaBetaEvaluate = rating(board, boardCopy, i, move);
//store the best move to make
int temp = alphaBeta(--depth, ChessEngine.invertBoard(boardCopy), -10000, 10000, false);
if (temp > alpha) {
alphaBetaSelectedSquare = i;
alphaBetaMoveToSquare = move;
alpha = temp;
}
//reset the board for the next simulated move
boardCopy = board.clone();
if (beta <= alpha) {
break;
}
}
}
return alpha;
} else if (maxPlayer == false && depth > 0) {
//for all of the moves that min can make
for (int i = 0; i < board.length; i++) {
for (int move : ChessEngine.getValidMoves(i, boardCopy)) {
//make the move
boardCopy[move] = boardCopy[i];
boardCopy[i] = '.';
beta = Math.min(beta, alphaBeta(--depth, ChessEngine.invertBoard(boardCopy), -10000, 10000, true));
//reset the board for the next simulated move
boardCopy = board.clone();
if (beta <= alpha) {
break;
}
}
}
return beta;
}
return alphaBetaEvaluate;
}
I dont get your implementation after all. First of all what you want to do is create a tree. A decision tree and propagates the decision up. You want to maximize your evaluation and also expect that the enemy will select the move that minimizes your evaluation in return.
So inverting the board does not sound so reasonable for me unless you know that the evaluation you do uppon the situation is correctly adjusting.
Another serious problem for me is that you always call the min/max for the next move with -10k and 10k as the bounderies for alpha and beta. This way your algorithm does not 'learn' from previous moves.
What you need is to check the algorithm again (wikipedia for instance, which I used) and see that they use alpha and beta being modified by former evaluation. This way the calculation in higher depth can firstly stop and secondly evaluate the best move better.
I am no expert in this. its decades ago when I wrote my implementation and I used something different.
Another idea is not to use min and max within the same method but use the min and max methods instead. It makes it more likely you spot other defects.
Also do not use two kings for evaluation. There is no goal in that. Two kings are random, cant win. One thing might be two knights or four queens and alike. It is not so random and you can see the queens dancing around without being able to catch each other. Or use three knights versus a single queen.
And try to create yourself some unit tests around your other parts. Just to insure that the parts are working correctly independently. And why are you using characters? Why not using enums or objects. You can reuse the objets for each field (its more like kinds of figures).
But anyhow this is style and not algorithm correctness.
I've been trying to make a dynamic light system in java, without using libraries. For some reason, though, it seems I can't get light to run efficiently. It flickers and lags a ton. I'm doing this with no previous understanding of lighting engines in games, so I'm open to suggestions. Here is my current update method:
public void updateLight( ArrayList<Block> blocks )
{
//reset light
light.reset();
//add the x and y of this light
light.addPoint( x, y );
//precision for loops
int ires = 1;
int jres = 2;
for( int i = 0; i < width; i += ires )
{
//get radians of current angle
float rdir = (float)Math.toRadians( dir + i - width/2 );
//set up pixel vars
int px, py;
for( int j = 0; j < length; j += jres )
{
//get position of pixel
px = (int)ZZmath.getVectorX( x, rdir, j );
py = (int)ZZmath.getVectorY( y, rdir, j );
//if point gets found
boolean foundpoint = false;
for( int n = 0; n < blocks.size(); n ++ )
{
//check if block is solid
//also check that collision is possible really quickly for efficiency
if( blocks.get( n ).solid )
{
//get info on block
int bx = blocks.get( n ).x;
int by = blocks.get( n ).y;
//quick trim
if( Math.abs( bx - px ) <= 32 && Math.abs( by - py ) <= 32 )
{
int bw = blocks.get( n ).w;
int bh = blocks.get( n ).h;
if( ZZmath.pointInBounds( px, py, bx, by, bw, bh ) )
{
//add point to polygon
light.addPoint( px, py );
//found point
foundpoint = true;
}
}
}
}
//if a point is found, break
if( foundpoint )
{
break;
}
//if at end of loop, add point
//loose definition of "end" to prevent flickers
if( j >= length - jres*2 )
{
light.addPoint( px, py );
}
}
}
}
This modifies a polygon that displays for light. I'll change that later. Any idea of ways I can make this run better? Also, no, no libraries. I don't have anything against them, just don't want to use one now.
You implementation doesn't appear to use much of the stuff I see here:
http://www.cs.utah.edu/~shirley/books/fcg2/rt.pdf
I'd recommend digesting this completely. If your objective is to understand ray tracing deeply, that's how it should be done.
Maybe your objective was to learn by writing your own raytracer. In my experience I would end up rewriting this code several times and still not get it completely right. It's good to get your hands dirty but it's not necessarily the most effective way to go about things.
Overall it looks like you need to study (object oriented) programming concepts, and take a data structures and algorithms course.
The biggest thing is readability. Document your code, for your future self if no one else. This means Clear comments before and during updateLight(). The existing comments are alright (though they paraphrase the code more than justify it), but "really quickly for efficiency" is a lie.
For a small issue of readability that could be a tiny drag on performance, make a local variable for blocks.get(n). Name it something short but descriptive, save typing and only make one method call to retrieve it.
"if at end of loop": I have no idea which loop you mean, and the for loops have definite ends. A comment }//end for or }//end for width is often helpful.
Checking if the block is solid is unnecessary! Just store your blocks in two lists, and only go through the solid blocks. Even if you have some desire to have flickering blocks, one remove and add is cheaper than O(width*length*numbernotsolid) extra work.
There are many ways you could structure how the blocks are stored to facilitate quick testing. You only want or need to test blocks whose coordinates are near to a particular light. The basic strategy is divide the space into a grid, and sort the blocks based on what section of the grid they fall into. Then when you have light in a particular section of the grid, you know you only need to test blocks in that section (and possibly a neighboring section - there are details depending on their width and the light's).
I have no idea whether that is along the lines of the right approach or not. I don't know much about raytracing, although it is or used to be rather slow. It looks like you have a decent naive implementation. There might be a slightly different naive approach that is faster and some more difficult (to code to completion) algorithms that are moderately yet more fast.
Also, I see no need to do this breadth first. Why not solve for one line (you call them pixels?) at a time. Count the number of times this code calls Math.toRadians. It looks like it's just an extraneous line because you could work along the same angle until ready for the next.
Im making a text based battleship game and the player plays against the computer. 3 random 3 unit long ships are placed on the board, and I want the computer to be able to guess around where his last guess was if his last guess was a hit. (but I want it to work so that he keeps guessing around the same spot until he got a hit and keep guessing around there until he gets the whole ship, or 3 hits)
It works a bit; the computer will guess near his last guess if it was a hit, but if he misses that guess then he starts guessing randomly again. Can someone help me out a bit?
-getGuess() method is the one with the AI-
/*
* computer class to handle computers guesses/ etc
* most methods are copied from player class, but slightly altered to account for variable names
* Methods that havent been copied have comments
*/
public class Computer{
static int firstCo, secondCo;
static int[] guessedHits={7,7,7,7,7,7,7,7,7,7,7,7,7,7,7,7,7,7};
//int array to store last guess
static int[] lastGuess = new int[2];
//int array to store current guess
static int[] guess=new int[2];
public static int[] computerShip1=new int[6];
public static int[] computerShip2=new int[6];
public static int[] computerShip3=new int[6];
/*
* method to choose random guess for computer - but make it guess around last guess if last guess was a hit
* return guess coordinate numbers in an array
*/
public static int[] getGuess(){
int[] guess=new int[2];
int firstCo, secCo;
int ran; //random int between 0 and 1 - will help to make random choices for guesses
if(isHit(lastGuess[0],lastGuess[1])){
ran=(int)(Math.random()*2);
//if ran is 0 and last guesses x coordinate was correct, set next guess to last x, and next y to last y +1
if((ran==0 && lastGuess[0]==Player.playerShip1[0]) || (ran==0 && lastGuess[0]==Player.playerShip1[2]) || (ran==0 && lastGuess[0]==Player.playerShip1[4])){
guess[0]=lastGuess[0];
guess[1]=lastGuess[1]+1;
//if ran is 1 and last guesses x coordinate was correct, set next guess to last x, and next y to last y -1
}else if((ran==1 && lastGuess[0]==Player.playerShip1[0]) || (ran==1 && lastGuess[0]==Player.playerShip1[2]) || (ran==1 && lastGuess[0]==Player.playerShip1[4])){
guess[0]=lastGuess[0];
guess[1]=lastGuess[1]-1;
//if ran is 0 and last guesses y coordinate was correct, set next guess to last y, and next x to last x +1
}else if((ran==0 && lastGuess[1]==Player.playerShip1[1]) || (ran==0 && lastGuess[1]==Player.playerShip1[3]) || (ran==0 && lastGuess[1]==Player.playerShip1[5])){
guess[0]=lastGuess[0]+1;
guess[1]=lastGuess[1];
//if ran is 1 and last guesses y coordinate was correct, set next guess to last y, and next x to last x -1
}else if((ran==1 && lastGuess[1]==Player.playerShip1[1]) || (ran==1 && lastGuess[1]==Player.playerShip1[3]) || (ran==1 && lastGuess[1]==Player.playerShip1[5])){
guess[0]=lastGuess[0]-1;
guess[1]=lastGuess[1];
}
return guess;
}else{
guess[0]=(int)(Math.random()*7);
guess[1]=(int)(Math.random()*7);
return guess;
}
}
public static boolean isHit(int firstC, int secC){
for(int i=0; i<Player.playerShip1.length; i=i+2){
if(firstC==Player.playerShip1[i] && secC==Player.playerShip1[i+1]){
return true;
}
if(i==4){
break;
}
}
for(int i=0; i<Player.playerShip2.length; i=i+2){
if(firstC==Player.playerShip2[i] && secC==Player.playerShip2[i+1]){
return true;
}
if(i==4){
break;
}
}
for(int i=0; i<Player.playerShip3.length; i=i+2){
if(firstC==Player.playerShip3[i] && secC==Player.playerShip3[i+1]){
return true;
}
if(i==4){
break;
}
}
return false;
}
public static void addHits(int firstC, int secC){
int index=-1;
for(int i=0; i<guessedHits.length; i++){
if(guessedHits[i]==7){
index=i;
break;
}
}
guessedHits[index]=firstC;
guessedHits[index+1]=secC;
}
public static void setComputerShips(){
int randX, randY;
int direction; //will be random int 0-1, determines direction ship will extend(up/down, left/right)
randX=(int)(Math.random()*7);
randY=(int)(Math.random()*7);
direction=(int)(Math.random()*2);
computerShip1[0]=randX;
computerShip1[1]=randY;
if(direction==0){//extend upwards or downwards 2 units(y values change, x stays the same)
computerShip1[2]=randX;
computerShip1[4]=randX;
if(randY>3){//if y value is greater than 3, has to extend down or it wont fit
computerShip1[3]=randY-1;
computerShip1[5]=randY-2;
}else if(randY<2){//if y value is less than 2, has to extend up or it wont fit
computerShip1[3]=randY+1;
computerShip1[5]=randY+2;
}else{//if direction doesnt matter, just extend upwards
computerShip1[3]=randY+1;
computerShip1[5]=randY+2;
}
}else if(direction==1){//extends left or right 2 units(y values stay the same, x changes)
computerShip1[3]=randY;
computerShip1[5]=randY;
if(randX>3){//if x is greater than 3, must extend left or it wont fit
computerShip1[2]=randX-1;
computerShip1[4]=randX-2;
}else if(randX<2){//if x is less than 2, must extend right or it wont fit
computerShip1[2]=randX+1;
computerShip1[4]=randX+2;
}else{//if direction doesnt matter, just extend right
computerShip1[2]=randX+1;
computerShip1[4]=randX+2;
}
}
//do same for both other ships
do{
randX=(int)(Math.random()*7);
randY=(int)(Math.random()*7);
}while((randX==computerShip1[0] && randY==computerShip1[1])||(randX==computerShip1[2]&&randY==computerShip1[3])||(randX==computerShip1[4]&&randY==computerShip1[5]));
direction=(int)(Math.random()*2);
computerShip2[0]=randX;
computerShip2[1]=randY;
if(direction==0){
computerShip2[2]=randX;
computerShip2[4]=randX;
if(randY>3){
computerShip2[3]=randY-1;
computerShip2[5]=randY-2;
}else if(randY<2){
computerShip2[3]=randY+1;
computerShip2[5]=randY+2;
}else{
computerShip2[3]=randY+1;
computerShip2[5]=randY+2;
}
}else if(direction==1){
computerShip2[3]=randY;
computerShip2[5]=randY;
if(randX>3){
computerShip2[2]=randX-1;
computerShip2[4]=randX-2;
}else if(randX<2){
computerShip2[2]=randX+1;
computerShip2[4]=randX+2;
}else{
computerShip2[2]=randX+1;
computerShip2[4]=randX+2;
}
}
do{
randX=(int)(Math.random()*7);
randY=(int)(Math.random()*7);
}while((randX==computerShip1[0] && randY==computerShip1[1])||(randX==computerShip1[2]&&randY==computerShip1[3])||(randX==computerShip1[4]&&randY==computerShip1[5])||(randX==computerShip2[0] && randY==computerShip2[1])||(randX==computerShip2[2]&&randY==computerShip2[3])||(randX==computerShip2[4]&&randY==computerShip2[5]));
direction=(int)(Math.random()*2);
computerShip3[0]=randX;
computerShip3[1]=randY;
if(direction==0){
computerShip3[2]=randX;
computerShip3[4]=randX;
if(randY>3){
computerShip3[3]=randY-1;
computerShip3[5]=randY-2;
}else if(randY<2){
computerShip3[3]=randY+1;
computerShip3[5]=randY+2;
}else{
computerShip3[3]=randY+1;
computerShip3[5]=randY+2;
}
}else if(direction==1){
computerShip3[3]=randY;
computerShip3[5]=randY;
if(randX>3){
computerShip3[2]=randX-1;
computerShip3[4]=randX-2;
}else if(randX<2){
computerShip3[2]=randX+1;
computerShip3[4]=randX+2;
}else{
computerShip3[2]=randX+1;
computerShip3[4]=randX+2;
}
}
}
public static boolean hasWon(){
if(guessedHits[17]!=7)
return true;
else
return false;
}
}
Your getGuess() function is the one you're after right?
1) You never account for times when you guess the same spot twice. Make a boolean value that determines whether the coordinates you're attempting to guess haven't already been guessed.
2) Your method of keeping ship coordinates is very awkward where 0,2,4 are X coords while 1,3,5 are Y coords? You're better off creating a Ship class that handles coordinates, and checks like isHit.
public class Ship {
int[] xCoords = new int[3];
int[] yCoords = new int[3];
public boolean isHit(int x, int y) {
return (Arrays.asList(xCoords).contains(x) && Arrays.asList(yCoords).contains(y));
}
}
Then you can:
if (Player.ship1.isHit(guess[0],guess[1])) {
....
}
At the very heart of it you have a little ways to go. You'll get better responses here if you start working at the problem then come back with specific problems you may have. Try to be as concise as possible when giving code snippets because not many people will spend much time going through an entire class to find a line or two giving issues.
Good luck!
---PS---
I wrote a battleship game about 3-4 years ago with some fairly advanced AI. I'll link it here:
https://github.com/GrahamBlanshard/AI-Battleship/blob/master/prograham/battleship/player/AIPlayer.java
First, I apologize for the... lame code (I was a much younger programmer, I swear!). If you want to view it to get hints that is fine. A brief explanation:
At the heart of it you need to create some form of datatype that stores his hits. Once a "hit" is scored you push it to the datatype, I used a Stack. The shots that are successful hits get stored on the stack until the ship is sunk. At that point it removes shots from the stack that belonged to the ship that just sunk. If there are shots still on the stack it knows it has hit a second ship during that process and continues to guess in the area.
To accomplish this, it goes through phases:
1) Shoot randomly until a hit.
2) Shoot around that shot (use a random(4) call to get N/S/E/W direction)
-- Keep doing this until you score a second shot
3) Create a "line" with the two points and fire along it until the ship sinks or...
4) Reverse the line and shoot the other direction.
Does that give you a good start to work with?
That's a lot of code to look at. So for now I will give some general suggestions that come to mind:
When the computer AI gets a "hit", set a "global" flag (more likely a class variable) and "remember" where the hit occured. On the following turns, guess the neighboring squares in some predetermined order (say north, south, east, west) until another hit is found. Then set another flag and on the next turn guess in the same direction as the second hit. The initial flag should only be reset when all three hits are found. This should fix the problem that a subsequent miss causes the computer AI to start guessing randomly again.