This question already has answers here:
Is there a performance difference between a for loop and a for-each loop?
(16 answers)
Closed 9 years ago.
If we have 2 ways to iterate :
First :
Object ob;
ArrayList<Obect> list;
for(int i=0;i<list.size();i++)
{ //Todo}
Second :
Object ob;
ArrayList<Obect> list;
for(Object o:list)
{ //Todo}
So what are the differences ? I found that in second case , if try to remove object in this cycle , I get a concurrent modification exception.
In your first example, you are iterating through the list yourself. You must take responsibility for maintaining the state of your iteration if you modify the collection during iteration.
In your second example, the "foreach" loop you are using uses an implicit Iterator behind the scenes. If you modify the collection yourself with an active Iterator, you will get a ConcurrentModificationException.
If you must remove an element while using an Iterator, then use an explicit Iterator:
for(Iterator<Object> itr = list.iterator(); itr.hasNext())
{
Object o = itr.next():
if (decideToRemove)
itr.remove();
}
The Iterator's remove operation is allowed to remove an element without throwing a ConcurrentModificationException.
The proper way to remove from collections is to use a 3rd kind of loop that looks like this:
for (Iterator<Object> iterator = new ArrayList<>().iterator(); iterator.hasNext(); ) {
Object o = iterator.next();
if (someCondition())
iterator.remove();
}
Related
This question already has answers here:
Iterating through a Collection, avoiding ConcurrentModificationException when removing objects in a loop
(31 answers)
Closed 8 years ago.
I'm trying to remove some elements from an ArrayList while iterating it like this:
for (String str : myArrayList) {
if (someCondition) {
myArrayList.remove(str);
}
}
Of course, I get a ConcurrentModificationException when trying to remove items from the list at the same time when iterating myArrayList. Is there some simple solution to solve this problem?
Use an Iterator and call remove():
Iterator<String> iter = myArrayList.iterator();
while (iter.hasNext()) {
String str = iter.next();
if (someCondition)
iter.remove();
}
As an alternative to everyone else's answers I've always done something like this:
List<String> toRemove = new ArrayList<String>();
for (String str : myArrayList) {
if (someCondition) {
toRemove.add(str);
}
}
myArrayList.removeAll(toRemove);
This will avoid you having to deal with the iterator directly, but requires another list. I've always preferred this route for whatever reason.
Java 8 user can do that: list.removeIf(...)
List<String> list = new ArrayList<>(Arrays.asList("a", "b", "c"));
list.removeIf(e -> (someCondition));
It will remove elements in the list, for which someCondition is satisfied
You have to use the iterator's remove() method, which means no enhanced for loop:
for (final Iterator iterator = myArrayList.iterator(); iterator.hasNext(); ) {
iterator.next();
if (someCondition) {
iterator.remove();
}
}
No, no, NO!
In single threated tasks you don't need to use Iterator, moreover, CopyOnWriteArrayList (due to performance hit).
Solution is much simpler: try to use canonical for loop instead of for-each loop.
According to Java copyright owners (some years ago Sun, now Oracle) for-each loop guide, it uses iterator to walk through collection and just hides it to make code looks better. But, unfortunately as we can see, it produced more problems than profits, otherwise this topic would not arise.
For example, this code will lead to java.util.ConcurrentModificationException when entering next iteration on modified ArrayList:
// process collection
for (SomeClass currElement: testList) {
SomeClass founDuplicate = findDuplicates(currElement);
if (founDuplicate != null) {
uniqueTestList.add(founDuplicate);
testList.remove(testList.indexOf(currElement));
}
}
But following code works just fine:
// process collection
for (int i = 0; i < testList.size(); i++) {
SomeClass currElement = testList.get(i);
SomeClass founDuplicate = findDuplicates(currElement);
if (founDuplicate != null) {
uniqueTestList.add(founDuplicate);
testList.remove(testList.indexOf(currElement));
i--; //to avoid skipping of shifted element
}
}
So, try to use indexing approach for iterating over collections and avoid for-each loop, as they are not equivalent!
For-each loop uses some internal iterators, which check collection modification and throw ConcurrentModificationException exception. To confirm this, take a closer look at the printed stack trace when using first example that I've posted:
Exception in thread "main" java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
at java.util.AbstractList$Itr.checkForComodification(AbstractList.java:372)
at java.util.AbstractList$Itr.next(AbstractList.java:343)
at TestFail.main(TestFail.java:43)
For multithreading use corresponding multitask approaches (like synchronized keyword).
While other suggested solutions work, If you really want the solution to be made thread safe you should replace ArrayList with CopyOnWriteArrayList
//List<String> s = new ArrayList<>(); //Will throw exception
List<String> s = new CopyOnWriteArrayList<>();
s.add("B");
Iterator<String> it = s.iterator();
s.add("A");
//Below removes only "B" from List
while (it.hasNext()) {
s.remove(it.next());
}
System.out.println(s);
If you want to modify your List during traversal, then you need to use the Iterator. And then you can use iterator.remove() to remove the elements during traversal.
List myArrayList = Collections.synchronizedList(new ArrayList());
//add your elements
myArrayList.add();
myArrayList.add();
myArrayList.add();
synchronized(myArrayList) {
Iterator i = myArrayList.iterator();
while (i.hasNext()){
Object object = i.next();
}
}
One alternative method is convert your List to array, iterate them and remove them directly from the List based on your logic.
List<String> myList = new ArrayList<String>(); // You can use either list or set
myList.add("abc");
myList.add("abcd");
myList.add("abcde");
myList.add("abcdef");
myList.add("abcdefg");
Object[] obj = myList.toArray();
for(Object o:obj) {
if(condition)
myList.remove(o.toString());
}
You can use the iterator remove() function to remove the object from underlying collection object. But in this case you can remove the same object and not any other object from the list.
from here
This question already has answers here:
Iterating through a Collection, avoiding ConcurrentModificationException when removing objects in a loop
(31 answers)
Closed 8 years ago.
I'm trying to remove some elements from an ArrayList while iterating it like this:
for (String str : myArrayList) {
if (someCondition) {
myArrayList.remove(str);
}
}
Of course, I get a ConcurrentModificationException when trying to remove items from the list at the same time when iterating myArrayList. Is there some simple solution to solve this problem?
Use an Iterator and call remove():
Iterator<String> iter = myArrayList.iterator();
while (iter.hasNext()) {
String str = iter.next();
if (someCondition)
iter.remove();
}
As an alternative to everyone else's answers I've always done something like this:
List<String> toRemove = new ArrayList<String>();
for (String str : myArrayList) {
if (someCondition) {
toRemove.add(str);
}
}
myArrayList.removeAll(toRemove);
This will avoid you having to deal with the iterator directly, but requires another list. I've always preferred this route for whatever reason.
Java 8 user can do that: list.removeIf(...)
List<String> list = new ArrayList<>(Arrays.asList("a", "b", "c"));
list.removeIf(e -> (someCondition));
It will remove elements in the list, for which someCondition is satisfied
You have to use the iterator's remove() method, which means no enhanced for loop:
for (final Iterator iterator = myArrayList.iterator(); iterator.hasNext(); ) {
iterator.next();
if (someCondition) {
iterator.remove();
}
}
No, no, NO!
In single threated tasks you don't need to use Iterator, moreover, CopyOnWriteArrayList (due to performance hit).
Solution is much simpler: try to use canonical for loop instead of for-each loop.
According to Java copyright owners (some years ago Sun, now Oracle) for-each loop guide, it uses iterator to walk through collection and just hides it to make code looks better. But, unfortunately as we can see, it produced more problems than profits, otherwise this topic would not arise.
For example, this code will lead to java.util.ConcurrentModificationException when entering next iteration on modified ArrayList:
// process collection
for (SomeClass currElement: testList) {
SomeClass founDuplicate = findDuplicates(currElement);
if (founDuplicate != null) {
uniqueTestList.add(founDuplicate);
testList.remove(testList.indexOf(currElement));
}
}
But following code works just fine:
// process collection
for (int i = 0; i < testList.size(); i++) {
SomeClass currElement = testList.get(i);
SomeClass founDuplicate = findDuplicates(currElement);
if (founDuplicate != null) {
uniqueTestList.add(founDuplicate);
testList.remove(testList.indexOf(currElement));
i--; //to avoid skipping of shifted element
}
}
So, try to use indexing approach for iterating over collections and avoid for-each loop, as they are not equivalent!
For-each loop uses some internal iterators, which check collection modification and throw ConcurrentModificationException exception. To confirm this, take a closer look at the printed stack trace when using first example that I've posted:
Exception in thread "main" java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
at java.util.AbstractList$Itr.checkForComodification(AbstractList.java:372)
at java.util.AbstractList$Itr.next(AbstractList.java:343)
at TestFail.main(TestFail.java:43)
For multithreading use corresponding multitask approaches (like synchronized keyword).
While other suggested solutions work, If you really want the solution to be made thread safe you should replace ArrayList with CopyOnWriteArrayList
//List<String> s = new ArrayList<>(); //Will throw exception
List<String> s = new CopyOnWriteArrayList<>();
s.add("B");
Iterator<String> it = s.iterator();
s.add("A");
//Below removes only "B" from List
while (it.hasNext()) {
s.remove(it.next());
}
System.out.println(s);
If you want to modify your List during traversal, then you need to use the Iterator. And then you can use iterator.remove() to remove the elements during traversal.
List myArrayList = Collections.synchronizedList(new ArrayList());
//add your elements
myArrayList.add();
myArrayList.add();
myArrayList.add();
synchronized(myArrayList) {
Iterator i = myArrayList.iterator();
while (i.hasNext()){
Object object = i.next();
}
}
One alternative method is convert your List to array, iterate them and remove them directly from the List based on your logic.
List<String> myList = new ArrayList<String>(); // You can use either list or set
myList.add("abc");
myList.add("abcd");
myList.add("abcde");
myList.add("abcdef");
myList.add("abcdefg");
Object[] obj = myList.toArray();
for(Object o:obj) {
if(condition)
myList.remove(o.toString());
}
You can use the iterator remove() function to remove the object from underlying collection object. But in this case you can remove the same object and not any other object from the list.
from here
This question already has answers here:
Concurrent Modification Exception : adding to an ArrayList
(10 answers)
Closed 5 years ago.
When I try to modify a collection while iterating through it, will result in ConcurrentModification exception (i.e., when using forEach and forEachRemaining)
But below code won't why?
List<String> list=new ArrayList<>();
list.add("ram");
list.add("ravi");
Iterator<String> it=list.iterator();
while(it.hasNext()){
System.out.printing(it.next());
it.remove();
}
You ask why
List<String> list = new ArrayList<>();
Iterator<String> it = list.iterator();
while(it.hasNext()) {
System.out.printing(it.next());
}
does not throw a CCME.
The answer is simple. A CCME is thrown if you modify a list while iterating it. You are iterating the list, but you are not modifying it at the same time. Therefore the condition for throwing a CCME is not satisfied.
(The same reasoning applies in the case of a non-empty list too ...)
Let me break it down for you. You said:
When I try to modify a collection while iterating through it, will result in ConcurrentModification exception.
(This is correct as a general statement, by the way. But not universally.)
Reducing that to simple propositional logic we get:
exception_thrown = iterating_collection AND modifying_collection
In your example
iterating_collection is TRUE
modifying_collection is FALSE
but
TRUE AND FALSE is FALSE
therefore
exception_thrown is FALSE
In English, CCME is not thrown.
Now for your updated code:
List<String> list = new ArrayList<>();
list.add("ram");
list.add("ravi");
Iterator<String> it = list.iterator();
while (it.hasNext()) {
System.out.printing(it.next());
it.remove();
}
In this case, you are modifying the collection using the iterator. This is the one situation where you are allowed to modify a collection while iterating it.
Think about it. If Iterator.remove() was not permitted to remove an element from the collection that is being iterated, it would be a fundamentally useless operation!
I am having the following problem:
Given an ArrayList (let's call it list), how can I "double-iterate" through it without getting ConcurrentModificationException?
Here's what I've tried:
iterator out = list.iterator();
iterator in;
while(out.hasNext()){
...
in = list.iterator();
while(in.hasNext()){
...
if(something)
in.remove();
}
You can't do that. A potential solution might be to mark objects to be removed, for example:
final List<Foo> toRemove = new ArrayList<>();
for (Foo a : list)
{
for (Foo b : list)
{
if (something)
{
toRemove.add(b);
}
}
}
list.removeAll(toRemove);
You may need some additional checks to see that the object isn't already marked for removal. It's impossible to say given how vague your example is.
You are trying to modify an iterator. It will give you concurrentModification exception.
In java 8 you can easily remove it using
list.removeIf(someCondition)
Try this link java8 collections
The Iterator instance provided through a call to List#iterator method preserves a count scalar allowing to detect external changes to the Collection container.
When an element is removed from the collection by any other mean than going through the same Iterator#remove(T) call, the count is not updated behind the scenes.
Therefore when you request for the #next() element through the iterator instance, the count is checked against an expected value and if both values does not match (since an element has been removed through another iterator) a ConcurrentModificationException is thrown (even though you may be working in a single threaded environment).
The solution whould be, as #Michael stated, to keep track of the container elements that should be removed then perform a bulk delete:
Collection<Object> temp = new ArrayList<>();
iterator out = list.iterator();
iterator in;
while (out.hasNext()) {
// ...
in = list.iterator();
while (in.hasNext()) {
// ...
if(something)
// just mark the element for deletion
temp.add(in.next());
}
}
// delete all the obsolete elements
list.removeAll(temp);
In collection once iterator creator If you try to modify the content not through same iterator it will throw concurrent exception.If you required some special kind of iterator then you can go ahead and implement your own.
This question already has answers here:
Iterating through a Collection, avoiding ConcurrentModificationException when removing objects in a loop
(31 answers)
Closed 7 years ago.
I've stumbled upon this code, which throws a ConcurrentModificationException
ArrayList<String> list = new ArrayList<String>(Arrays.asList("a", "b", "c", "d"));
for (String s : list) {
if (s.equals("a"))
list.remove(s);
}
If you add an Iterator and use a while-loop, the code works fine:
ArrayList<String> list = new ArrayList<String>(Arrays.asList("a", "b", "c", "d"));
Iterator<String> iter = list.iterator();
while (iter.hasNext()) {
String s = iter.next();
if (s.equals("a")) {
iter.remove();
}
}
I dont understand, why it is necessary, to use Iterator<String> in this case.
Is it because of the ArrayList not having some sort of ability to get iterated, altough it is a subclass of Collection?
Is it necessary to use the while-loop, or could you produce a version with a for-loop?
If a Collection is modified while iterating over it, in most of the implementations, a ConcurrentModificationException is thrown.
The "foreach" version:
for (String s : list) {
if (s.equals("a"))
list.remove(s);
}
internally is equivalent to
for(Iterator<String> i = list.iterator(); i.hasNext(); ) {
String s = i.next();
if (s.equals("a"))
list.remove(s);
}
As you can see, an interator is created, but the list is modified directly. The list can only be modified by the iterator i used to iterate over it.
Your link actually explains it pretty well:
In the foreach loop, compiler will make the .next() called after the operation of removing element, which caused the ConcurrentModificationException.
The for uses an iterator internally. But you delete on the list directly => CME. The internal call to next after the deletion will throw it because it finds the list modified.
In the example with while, you delete through the iterator, which works fine.
When removing object from collections, use ITERATORS
Your code does not work because you are modifying the collection while looping over it. According to Oracle's javadoc the only safe way to do it is using iterators.
Note that Iterator.remove() is the only safe way to modify a collection during iteration; the behavior is unspecified if the underlying collection is modified in any other way while the iteration is in progress.
Have a look at this for further infos