We Keep Coding

Visibility of mutable object under different locks in Java

mFeaute is a mutable object.
I want to know if the change of mFeature in setFeature(Feature feature) is visible to mFeature in useFeature(...) with a different explicit form of synchronized.
Thanks.
public class FeatureService {
private static Feature mFeature= null;
private final Object MUTEX = new Object();
...
static void setFeature(Feature feature){
// doSomething
synchronized (FeatureService.class){
mFeature = feature;
// doSomething
}
// doSomething
}
public void useFeature(...){
// doSomething
synchronized (MUTEX){
someFunction(mFeature);
// doSomething
}
// doSomething
}
}
}

The above code is suffering from a data race and hence is broken. You do not have a happens before edge between the write and the read of mfeature because different locks are used. You need to use the same lock instance for both reading and writing.

It is unclear what you are trying to synchronize on (ClassA and ObjectB are vague). In general, you want to synchronize on a single mutex when interacting with a given shared resource. Create an Object to serve as the mutex upon which you synchronize when accessing the internal mFeature.
public class FeatureService {
private static Feature mFeature= null;
private static final Object MUTEX = new Object();
...
static void setFeature(Feature feature){
synchronized (MUTEX){
mFeature = feature;
}
}
public void useFeature(...){
synchronized (MUTEX){
someFunction(mFeature);
}
}
}

Synchronize a method over different instances of an Object

I have a class:
class Station {
public void decrement(){
// ...
}
}
There are two different instances of it: station1 and station2. The function decrement() gets called on station1 and station2 by two different threads. I want to synchronize decrement() over all objects and threads.
As per what I read, synchronized keyword synchronizes the calls of a function of one single object, so it won't work here. How do I synchronize calls across all instances of Station?

synchronized object instead. Example:
class Station {
private final static Object DECREMENT_LOCKER = new Object();
public void decrement(){
synchronized (DECREMENT_LOCKER) {
//do smt
}
}
}

Synchronizing two methods in Java

I have a class like this one:
public class IClass{
public void draw(){...}; //is called periodically by the rendering thread
public void foo(){...}; //is called asynchronously from another Thread(it could be an onTouchEvent() method for example)
}
I want the foo() method to wait until the draw method is finished and vice versa. How can I do this in Java?
regards

Make the methods synchronized.
public synchronized void draw() { System.out.println("draw"); }
public synchronized void foo() { System.out.println("foo"); }
Or synchronize on the same object.
private static final Object syncObj = new Object();
public void draw() {
synchronized (syncObj) {
System.out.println("draw");
}
}
public void foo() {
synchronized (syncObj) {
System.out.println("foo");
}
}

Putting synchronized on a method means the thread has to acquire the lock on the object instance before entering that method, so if you have two different methods marked synchronized the threads entering them will be contending for the same lock, and once one thread gets the lock all other threads are shut out of all methods that synchronize on that same lock. So in order for the two methods to run concurrently they would have to use different locks, like this:
public class IClass {
private final Object lockDraw = new Object();
private final Object lockFoo = new Object();
public void draw() {
synchronized(lockDraw) {
//method draw
}
}
public void foo() {
synchronized(lockFoo) {
//method foo
}
}
}
Both methods lock the same monitor. Therefore, you can't simultaneously execute them on the same object from different threads (one of the two methods will block until the other is finished).

Java synchronized and static synchronized method accessing static field

What would be the behaviour of the following program where static synchronized method and instance synchronized method is trying to access static field of same class in different threads? Will any thread get blocked? Its very confusing.
class MyClass
{
public static int i = 5;
public synchronized void m1()
{
System.out.println(i); //uses static field i of MyClass
//T1 is executing this method
}
public static synchronized void m3()
{
//T2 will be able to call this method on same object lock while it is using
//static field i???
System.out.println(i);//uses static field i of MyClass
}
}

Synchronized instance methods are equivalent of
public void m1() {
synchronized(this) {
...
}
}
(well, they are not exactly the same, but the answer to your question does not suffer from that difference).
Synchronized static methods are synchronized on the class:
public void m2() {
synchronized(MyClass.class) {
...
}
}
As you can see, two block are synchronized on difference objects: m1 is synchronized on the instance it is called on, and m2 is synchronized on the instance of Class<MyClass> which represents your class in JVM. So those two methods can be called without blocking each other.

You are always synchronizing on an object.
Funciton m1 synchronizes on an instance of an object on which it is called.
Function m3 synchronizes on the class itself.
m1 could be written as:
public void m1()
{
synchronized(this) {
System.out.println(i); //uses static field i of MyClass
//T1 is executing this method
}
}
Therefore you are synchronizing on two different objects and these two methods can acces any global variable concurrently.

Your sample code looks good.
Best way to assure synchronization of static variables according to me is. As lock object is not accessible outside your Class. See below.
public class MyClass
{
private static int i = 0;
private static final Object lockObject = new Object();
public void m1() {
synchronized (lockObject ) {
//Use you static var
}
}
public void m3() {
synchronized (lockObject ) {
//Use you static var
}
}
}

The method m1 and m3 can be executed independently.
Because as you already said static synchronized is on the object. Therefore the same as synchronize(MyClass.class).
synchronized are instance wide usable. So it is only blocked for the instances. It would be the same as using:
MyClass myClass = new MyClass();
synchronize (myClass)
{
.....
}

Java does not have any synchronization controls that relate to accessing static fields.
If you make your methods empty, the synchronization will be exactly the same.
Specifically, as long as any thread is executing any synchronized static method in that type, all other threads that call synchronized static methods will wait for them to finish, so that at most one synchronized static method will be executing at once.

Java Synchronization inside Another Thread

I have a quick question about Java synchronization.
Please assume the following code:
public class Test {
private String address;
private int age;
public synchronized setAddress(String a) {
address = a;
}
public synchronized setAge(int a) {
age = a;
}
public synchronized void start() {
...
listener = new Thread(new Runnable(){
public void run() {
...
setAge(10);
...
synchronized(Test.this) {
address = null;
}
}
}
}
}
I am a little bit unsure about Java synchronization when synchronized method or synchronized block is called inside another thread.
Assume the thread running class Test as A, and
the listener thread B.
Then if I execute the code above, does it guarantee that synchronized method calls and synchronized block are synchronized with the A (the thread running Test class) ?
Thank you for reading.

No,
The synchronized methods are locking the Test instance, while the synchronized block is locking the Test class object.
See Java synchronized static methods: lock on object or class and Java Synchronized Block for .class