Initialising arrays of objects - java

I'm new to Java so this might be a dumb question. Say I create a class called SomeObject with simple getters and setters for some parameter. Next I want to create an array of 3 instances of that object. Can anyone tell me what's the difference between:
SomeObject[] objectArray = {new SomeObject(),new SomeObject(),new SomeObject()};
objectArray[0].setValue(10);
and:
SomeObject[] objectArray = new SomeObject[3];
objectArray[0].setValue(10);
In the first case I can perfectly well get the value of objects[0]:
System.out.println(objectArray[0].getValue());
..while the latter gives a NullPointerException while trying to set the value. Am I missing something or could it be I made some mistake of a different kind?

When you create an array of objects, you actually need 2 steps
Create the array
Create the objects
The first method does both, while the 2nd method does only step one, thus the references to the actual objects are null.
Object[] objects = {new Object(),new Object(),new Object()};
Here the {...} creates the array and the inner news create the objects.
Object[] objects = new Object[3];
Here the new creates the array of size 3. But individual elements, such as object[0] are not created and thus the reference is null, and this causes the exception.

Your first line of code creates three Objects to fill the array with.
Your second line of code creates an empty array and never fills it, so it's still full of null.

The second version, Object[] objects = new Object[3];, creates an array of size three, but the objects don't exist, they're null.
The first one, Object[] objects = {new Object(),new Object(),new Object()}; explicitly creates the objects at the same time the array is created, so you can access them

If you want to do it the second way, you can try this:
SomeObject[] objectArray = new SomeObject[3];
objectArray[0] = new SomeObject(); //create SomeObject
objectArray[0].setValue(10); //give SomeObject the value of 10

Related

How to create an array of objects of a specific class type

I have a function that returns an Object. The Object can contain an array of primatives or an array of objects. In C# I can create an empty array of objects or primatives using code like:
Array values = Array.CreateInstance(/*Type*/type, /*int*/length);
Is there an equivalent in Java?
How to create an array of objects of a specific class type
Test[] tests = new Test[length] ;
And if you want to have a mix up of Primitives and Objects, though it is not suggestable, If you want to mix primitives with Objects
Object[] objs = new Object[length];
That allows you to both primitives(in form of wrappers) and normal Objects together.
If you have a class called Test of your own, you can create an array of Test's like
Note that until you initialise the elements in that array, they have null as their value.
Assuming you only know the element type at execution time, I think you're looking for Array.newInstance.
Object intArray = Array.newInstance(int.class, 10);
Object stringArray = Array.newInstance(String.class, 10);
(That will create an int[] and a String[] respectively.)
Object[] array = new Object[length];
Or with your own type:
MyType[] array = new MyType[length];

converting list to an array of fixed size

Could anyone please explain me why this code snippet works?
Object[] op = new Object[0];
ArrayList r = new ArrayList();
r.add("1");
r.add("3");
r.add("5");
r.add("6");
r.add("8");
r.add("10");
op = r.toArray();
System.out.println(op[3]);
This prints out 6. I know that you can convert list to array but I was thinking that if the array is fixed size then you can't add further elements. In this case the array op is with fixed size "0" so why/how are the list elements being added to the array? Thanks
You need to distinguish between the reference to your array object (that is Object[] op) and the actual array object to which the reference points.
With
Object[] op = new Object[0];
you are creating an array of size 0 and assign it to the op reference.
But then, with
op = r.toArray();
you are assigning a new array object to the op reference. This new array object has been created by the toArray() method with the appropriate size.
The earlier array object which was created with new Object[0]; is now dangling and subject to garbage collection.
For the same reason that this code prints out X instead of ABC:
String s = "ABC";
String t = "XYZ";
s = t.substring(0, 1);
System.out.println(s);
You're reassigning the value of op, and the new value has nothing to do with the old value.
You misunderstood one important thing here.
Java identifiers are only pointers to objects, not objects themselves.
Here when you do
Object[] op = new Object[0];
you create a new instance array with a fixed size of 0, and you point the identifier "op" to it.
But when you later do
op = r.toArray();
you just overwrite where your former identifier point to. You lose the reference to your first array that will be garbaged collected.
"op" desgin now a new array, your former one just disappear.

Difference between Arrays.asList(array) and new ArrayList<Integer>(Arrays.asList(array))

What is the difference between
List<Integer> list1 = new ArrayList<Integer>(Arrays.asList(ia)); // Copy
List<Integer> list2 = Arrays.asList(ia);
, where ia is an array of integers?
I came to know that some operations are not allowed in list2. Why is it so?
How is it stored in memory (references / copy)?
When I shuffle the lists, list1 doesn't affect the original array, but list2 does. But still list2 is somewhat confusing.
How does ArrayList being upcasted to list differ from creating a new ArrayList?
list1 differs from (1)
ArrayList<Integer> list1 = new ArrayList<Integer>(Arrays.asList(ia));
First, let's see what this does:
Arrays.asList(ia)
It takes an array ia and creates a wrapper that implements List<Integer>, which makes the original array available as a list. Nothing is copied and all, only a single wrapper object is created. Operations on the list wrapper are propagated to the original array. This means that if you shuffle the list wrapper, the original array is shuffled as well, if you overwrite an element, it gets overwritten in the original array, etc. Of course, some List operations aren't allowed on the wrapper, like adding or removing elements from the list, you can only read or overwrite the elements.
Note that the list wrapper doesn't extend ArrayList - it's a different kind of object. ArrayLists have their own, internal array, in which they store their elements, and are able to resize the internal arrays etc. The wrapper doesn't have its own internal array, it only propagates operations to the array given to it.
On the other hand, if you subsequently create a new array as
new ArrayList<Integer>(Arrays.asList(ia))
then you create new ArrayList, which is a full, independent copy of the original one. Although here you create the wrapper using Arrays.asList as well, it is used only during the construction of the new ArrayList and is garbage-collected afterwards. The structure of this new ArrayList is completely independent of the original array. It contains the same elements (both the original array and this new ArrayList reference the same integers in memory), but it creates a new, internal array, that holds the references. So when you shuffle it, add, remove elements etc., the original array is unchanged.
Well, this is because ArrayList resulting from Arrays.asList() is not of the type java.util.ArrayList.
Arrays.asList() creates an ArrayList of type java.util.Arrays$ArrayList which does not extend java.util.ArrayList, but only extends java.util.AbstractList.
List<Integer> list1 = new ArrayList<Integer>(Arrays.asList(ia)); //copy
In this case, list1 is of type ArrayList.
List<Integer> list2 = Arrays.asList(ia);
Here, the list is returned as a List view, meaning it has only the methods attached to that interface. Hence why some methods are not allowed on list2.
ArrayList<Integer> list1 = new ArrayList<Integer>(Arrays.asList(ia));
Here, you are creating a new ArrayList. You're simply passing it a value in the constructor. This is not an example of casting. In casting, it might look more like this:
ArrayList list1 = (ArrayList)Arrays.asList(ia);
First of all, the Arrays class is a utility class which contains a number of utility methods to operate on Arrays (thanks to the Arrays class. Otherwise, we would have needed to create our own methods to act on Array objects)
asList() method:
asList method is one of the utility methods of Array class, it is a static method that's why we can call this method by its class name (like Arrays.asList(T...a) )
Now here is the twist. Please note that this method doesn't create new ArrayList object. It just returns a List reference to an existing Array object (so now after using asList method, two references to existing Array object gets created)
and this is the reason. All methods that operate on List object, may not work on this Array object using the List reference. Like
for example, Arrays size is fixed in length, hence you obviously can not add or remove elements from Array object using this List reference (like list.add(10) or list.remove(10);. Else it will throw UnsupportedOperationException).
any change you are doing using a list reference will be reflected in the exiting Arrays object (as you are operating on an existing Array object by using a list reference)
In the first case, you are creating a new Arraylist object (in the second case, only a reference to existing Array object is created, but not a new ArrayList object), so now there are two different objects. One is the Array object and another is the ArrayList object and there isn't any connection between them (so changes in one object will not be reflected/affected in another object (that is, in case 2, Array and Arraylist are two different objects)
Case 1:
Integer [] ia = {1,2,3,4};
System.out.println("Array : "+Arrays.toString(ia));
List<Integer> list1 = new ArrayList<Integer>(Arrays.asList(ia)); // new ArrayList object is created , no connection between existing Array Object
list1.add(5);
list1.add(6);
list1.remove(0);
list1.remove(0);
System.out.println("list1: " + list1);
System.out.println("Array: " + Arrays.toString(ia));
Case 2:
Integer [] ia = {1,2,3,4};
System.out.println("Array: " + Arrays.toString(ia));
List<Integer> list2 = Arrays.asList(ia); // Creates only a (new) List reference to the existing Array object (and NOT a new ArrayList Object)
// list2.add(5); // It will throw java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException - invalid operation (as Array size is fixed)
list2.set(0,10); // Making changes in the existing Array object using the List reference - valid
list2.set(1,11);
ia[2]=12; // Making changes in the existing Array object using the Array reference - valid
System.out.println("list2: " + list2);
System.out.println("Array: " + Arrays.toString(ia));
An explanation with documentation references would be better for someone looking for answer.
1. java.util.Arrays
This is a utility class with bunch of static methods to operate on given array
asList is one such static method that takes input array and returns an object of java.util.Arrays.ArrayList which is a static nested class that extends AbstractList<E> which in turn implements List interface.
So Arrays.asList(inarray) returns a List wrapper around the input array, but this wrapper is java.util.Arrays.ArrayList and not java.util.ArrayList and it refers to the same array, so adding more elements to the List wrapped array would affect the original one too and also we cannot change the length.
2. java.util.ArrayList
ArrayList has a bunch of overloaded constructors
public ArrayList() - // Returns arraylist with default capacity 10
public ArrayList(Collection<? extends E> c)
public ArrayList(int initialCapacity)
So when we pass the Arrays.asList returned object, i.e., List(AbstractList) to the second constructor above, it will create a new dynamic array (this array size increases as we add more elements than its capacity and also the new elements will not affect the original array) shallow copying the original array (shallow copy means it copies over the references only and does not create a new set of same objects as in original array)
String names[] = new String[]{"Avinash","Amol","John","Peter"};
java.util.List<String> namesList = Arrays.asList(names);
or
String names[] = new String[]{"Avinash","Amol","John","Peter"};
java.util.List<String> temp = Arrays.asList(names);
The above statement adds the wrapper on the input array. So the methods like add and remove will not be applicable on the list reference object 'namesList'.
If you try to add an element in the existing array/list then you will get "Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException".
The above operation is readonly or viewonly.
We can not perform add or remove operation in list object.
But
String names[] = new String[]{"Avinash","Amol","John","Peter"};
java.util.ArrayList<String> list1 = new ArrayList<>(Arrays.asList(names));
or
String names[] = new String[]{"Avinash","Amol","John","Peter"};
java.util.List<String> listObject = Arrays.asList(names);
java.util.ArrayList<String> list1 = new ArrayList<>(listObject);
In the above statement you have created a concrete instance of an ArrayList class and passed a list as a parameter.
In this case, methods add and remove will work properly as both methods are from ArrayList class, so here we won't get any UnSupportedOperationException.
Changes made in the Arraylist object (method add or remove an element in/from an arraylist) will get not reflect in to the original java.util.List object.
String names[] = new String[] {
"Avinash",
"Amol",
"John",
"Peter"
};
java.util.List < String > listObject = Arrays.asList(names);
java.util.ArrayList < String > list1 = new ArrayList < > (listObject);
for (String string: list1) {
System.out.print(" " + string);
}
list1.add("Alex"); // Added without any exception
list1.remove("Avinash"); // Added without any exception will not make any changes in original list in this case temp object.
for (String string: list1) {
System.out.print(" " + string);
}
String existingNames[] = new String[] {
"Avinash",
"Amol",
"John",
"Peter"
};
java.util.List < String > namesList = Arrays.asList(names);
namesList.add("Bob"); // UnsupportedOperationException occur
namesList.remove("Avinash"); // UnsupportedOperationException
Note that, in Java 8, 'ia' above must be Integer[] and not int[]. Arrays.asList() of an int array returns a list with a single element. When using the OP's code snippet, the compiler will catch the issue, but some methods (e.g., Collections.shuffle()) will silently fail to do what you expect.
Many people have answered the mechanical details already, but it's worth noting:
This is a poor design choice, by Java.
Java's asList method is documented as "Returns a fixed-size list...". If you take its result and call (say) the .add method, it throws an UnsupportedOperationException. This is unintuitive behavior! If a method says it returns a List, the standard expectation is that it returns an object which supports the methods of interface List. A developer shouldn't have to memorize which of the umpteen util.List methods create Lists that don't actually support all the List methods.
If they had named the method asImmutableList, it would make sense. Or if they just had the method return an actual List (and copy the backing array), it would make sense. They decided to favor both runtime-performance and short names, at the expense of violating both the principle of least astonishment and the good object-oriented practice of avoiding UnsupportedOperationExceptions.
(Also, the designers might have made a interface ImmutableList, to avoid a plethora of UnsupportedOperationExceptions.)
package com.copy;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.Iterator;
import java.util.List;
public class CopyArray {
public static void main(String[] args) {
List<Integer> list1, list2 = null;
Integer[] intarr = { 3, 4, 2, 1 };
list1 = new ArrayList<Integer>(Arrays.asList(intarr));
list1.add(30);
list2 = Arrays.asList(intarr);
// list2.add(40); Here, we can't modify the existing list,because it's a wrapper
System.out.println("List1");
Iterator<Integer> itr1 = list1.iterator();
while (itr1.hasNext()) {
System.out.println(itr1.next());
}
System.out.println("List2");
Iterator<Integer> itr2 = list2.iterator();
while (itr2.hasNext()) {
System.out.println(itr2.next());
}
}
}
Arrays.asList()
This method returns its own implementation of List. It takes an array as an argument and builds methods and attributes on top of it, since it is not copying any data from an array but using the original array this causes alteration in original array when you modify list returned by the Arrays.asList() method.
On the other hand, ArrayList(Arrays.asList());
is a constructor of ArrayList class which takes a list as argument and returns an ArrayList that is independent of list, i.e., Arrays.asList() in this case passed as an argument.
That is why you see these results.
1.List<Integer> list1 = new ArrayList<Integer>(Arrays.asList(ia)); //copy
2.List<Integer> list2 = Arrays.asList(ia);
In line 2, Arrays.asList(ia) returns a List reference of inner class object defined within Arrays, which is also called ArrayList but is private and only extends AbstractList. This means what returned from Arrays.asList(ia) is a class object different from what you get from new ArrayList<Integer>.
You cannot use some operations to line 2 because the inner private class within Arrays does not provide those methods.
Take a look at this link and see what you can do with the private inner class:
http://grepcode.com/file/repository.grepcode.com/java/root/jdk/openjdk/6-b14/java/util/Arrays.java#Arrays.ArrayList
Line 1 creates a new ArrayList object copying elements from what you get from line 2. So you can do whatever you want since java.util.ArrayList provides all those methods.
In response to some comments asking questions about the behaviour of Arrays.asList() since Java 8:
int[] arr1 = {1,2,3};
/*
Arrays are objects in Java, internally int[] will be represented by
an Integer Array object which when printed on console shall output
a pattern such as
[I#address for 1-dim int array,
[[I#address for 2-dim int array,
[[F#address for 2-dim float array etc.
*/
System.out.println(Arrays.asList(arr1));
/*
The line below results in Compile time error as Arrays.asList(int[] array)
returns List<int[]>. The returned list contains only one element
and that is the int[] {1,2,3}
*/
// List<Integer> list1 = Arrays.asList(arr1);
/*
Arrays.asList(arr1) is Arrays$ArrayList object whose only element is int[] array
so the line below prints [[I#...], where [I#... is the array object.
*/
System.out.println(Arrays.asList(arr1));
/*
This prints [I#..., the actual array object stored as single element
in the Arrays$ArrayList object.
*/
System.out.println(Arrays.asList(arr1).get(0));
// prints the contents of array [1,2,3]
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(Arrays.asList(arr1).get(0)));
Integer[] arr2 = {1,2,3};
/*
Arrays.asList(arr) is Arrays$ArrayList object which is
a wrapper list object containing three elements 1,2,3.
Technically, it is pointing to the original Integer[] array
*/
List<Integer> list2 = Arrays.asList(arr2);
// prints the contents of list [1,2,3]
System.out.println(list2);
Summary of the difference -
When a list is created without using the new, the operator Arrays.asList() method returns a wrapper which means:
you can perform an add/update operation.
the changes done in the original array will be reflected to List as well and vice versa.

How to initialize an array of lists with a specific type?

I have a method that needs to return List<'MyClass>[] and need to set up a local variable to do so, but am having trouble with initialization.
I tried:
List<MyClass>[] lists = new List<MyClass>[5];
Which gave me an error of "Cannot create a generic array of List"
I tried casting an array of Objects:
List<MyClass>[] lists = (List<MyClass>[]) new Object[5];
Which gave me a casting error in runtime.
I also tried:
List<MyClass>[] lists = (List<MyClass>[]) new List[5];
Which resulted in a null pointer exception.
Anyone know what needs to be done to get this to work?
Thanks.
You declare a list like so (for example ArrayList):
List<MyClass> list = new ArrayList<MyClass>();
To create an array of this list you do:
List<?>[] listArray = new List<?>[]{list};
This will put your list in an array. I'm assuming that's what you want and not simply items from the list.

This is a legal way to initialize an array. But how would I access its elements?

I am preparing for the entry-level Oracle certification - OCA - Java Programmer I, since they require people to take this one before taking the next one (used to be possible to just go for SCJP directly, which is equivalent of OCP - Java Programmer II)
I came across this question on array initialization, that got me a bit puzzled. Obviously, one can declare and initialize an array like this:
Object[] objects = { new Object[1], new Object[34] };
as the arrays are objects, you can stick object arrays into an object array. You can easily get at one or the other object array by doing objects[0] or objects[1] but where would you go from there? How would you access the, say, 16th Object from the object array stored under objects[1]?
Basically, my question can be simplified to this:
Object o = new Object[100];
The above compiles. However, how would one access individual objects in the Object array o?
An Object[] is also an Object, which is why your declaration
Object o = new Object[100];
works.* To access the elements, though, you need to cast it back to an Object[]. For example:
Object elt = ((Object[]) o)[3];
For your original declaration:
Object[] objects = { new Object[1], new Object[34] };
you will have to do a similar thing to access the 16th element of objects[1]:
Object elt = ((Object[]) (objects[1]))[15];
Of course, you can avoid all this casting by declaring:
Object[][] objects = { new Object[1], new Object[34] };
in the first place. Then you can just do objects[1][15].
* Note that this is true only of Object, which has special status as the root of the object hierarchy in Java. An Integer[] cannot be assigned to an Integer variable.
You'd have to cast it back to Object[]:
Object o = new Object[] {new String("abc"), null, new Integer(1)};
Object[] arr = (Object[]) o;
Object elem = arr[0];
System.out.println(elem);
This prints abc.
It works because System.out.println() is happy to take an Object. If it required a String, you'd need another downcast.

Categories