hi I have an entity with this annotation
#Entity
#Table(name = "REPORT_WORK")
But for some reason hibernate keep saying Missing Table: REPORT_REPORT_WORK
I know that is the problem because of when I change the name to "REPORT_WORKX"
It will say Missing Table: REPORT_REPORT_WORKX
Has any encountered this issue before?
Update: when I change the name to JJJJ
It will say Missing Table: REPORT_JJJJ
so for some reason there it is auto appending REPORT_
Configuration:
hibernate.hbm2ddl.auto=validate
I suspect that the problem is your Hibernate configurations. Specifically, if you don't have an appropriate setting for hibernate.hbm2ddl.auto, Hibernate won't automatically update the database schema when you change your model.
(And if you don't want the updates to happen automatically, then you need to figure out what schema changes are needed, code them as SQL DDL, and run them manually.)
Can you post your persistence.xml (or equivalent)?
It sounds like you are implementing org.hibernate.cfg.NamingStrategy, get rid of this configuration.
Some additional info:
JPA (Hibernate) and custom table prefixes
Related
I have a Mysql DB, schema name "myschema". This schema has tables, where some of this tables are
audit tables. This is my dependency on my java project.
<dependency>
<groupId>org.hibernate</groupId>
<artifactId>hibernate-envers</artifactId>
<version>5.1.0.Final</version>
</dependency>
Now I had like to remore this audit tables on my currect DB and more them on a separate instance, with a branch new uri.
How can this be done? Any advise, thank you in advance
Please take a look at the Configuration Options:
org.hibernate.envers.default_schema
The default schema name that should be used for audit tables.
org.hibernate.envers.default_catalog
The default catalog name that should be used for audit tables.
The option that you should use depends on if your database.
There is also a bug that if you use the default revision entity mappings provided out of the box by Envers that those mappings won't be properly mapped when using these configuration options, only the tables that are related to the entity mappings.
In order to properly map the REVINFO table to the appropriate schema or catalog, a custom revision entity mapping will need to be used in cojunction with a the #Table annotation in order to explicitly specify the schema/catalog. Please see the section Revision Log that describes using a custom #RevisionEntity annotated entity mapping with Envers.
AFAIK Envers does not support using a separate database/DataSource. There seem to be a couple of ways to get the data to the other database: Oracle Database Link - MySQL Equivalent?
Alternatively I guess you could write a custom DataSource that delegates statements to different datasources depending on the statement.
Check if an auditing table is mentioned and if so send it to the audit database.
I'm trying to do a simple SELECT query in a table named ECM (in uppercase) on a Sybase db with Hibernate. I've annotated my DBO this way :
#Entity
#Table(name="ECM")
public class RelationshipDbo {
...
}
However, I'm facing a "table not found" error : the generated SQL has the table name in lowercase. I cannot change the database configuration to tell it to be case-insensitive.
I've also tried putting quotes like this :
#Table(name="`ECM`")
and this :
#Table(name="'ECM'")
Result : the quotes are added in the query, but the table name is still converted from uppercase to lowercase.
Technical information :
Hibernate 4.3
JPA 1.2
org.hibernate.dialect.SybaseDialect
Have you guys any idea?
EDIT: Also tried this Hibernate changes #Table(name) to lowercase
Then my columns names and table name are automatically quoted, but the names still get lowercased.
I think I have your answer:
Basically, you need to change the naming strategy for you JPA provider. How you do this will depend on how you setup your project.
In my case, using spring boot data I set a property in my application.properties to
spring.jpa.hibernate.naming-strategy=org.hibernate.cfg.EJB3NamingStrategy
Without more details from you I can't give more specifics on how to do this.
My goal is a little different since was trying to create tables upper case and hibernate created them in lower case. Also i was using MySQL not Sybase.
But for me quoting the names like this worked:
#Entity
#Table(name="\"ECM\"")
public class RelationshipDbo {
...
}
Then tables were created upper case. Maybe that helps also for the queries.
What is your Sybase db version ?
SybaseDialect has been deprecated in Hibernate 3.5 and then refactored since Hibernate 4.1 with a bunch of subclasses matching different versions of Sybase. Have you tried one of the subclasses to see if it makes any difference?
org.hibernate.dialect.Sybase11Dialect
org.hibernate.dialect.SybaseAnywhereDialect
org.hibernate.dialect.SybaseASE15Dialect
Try this:
Use backticks as in #Table(name="`ECM`")?
This must work from Hibernate point. If not then problem should be in DB (if i'm not wrong)
I have an issue testing a Hibernate application which queries multiple catalogs/schemas.
The production database is Sybase and in addition to entities mapped to the default catalog/schema there are two entities mapped as below. There are therefore three catalogs in total.
#Table(catalog = "corp_ref_db", schema = "dbo", name = "WORKFORCE_V2")
public class EmployeeRecord implements Serializable {
}
#Table(catalog = "reference", schema = "dbo", name="cntry")
public class Country implements Serializable {
}
This all works in the application without any issues. However when unit testing my usual strategy is to use HSQL with hibernate's ddl flag set to auto and have dbunit populate the tables.
This all works fine when the tables are all in the same schema.
However, since adding these additional tables, testing is broken as the DDL will not run as HSQL only supports one catalog.
create table corp_ref_db.dbo.WORKFORCE_V2
user lacks privilege or object not found: CORP_REF_DB
If there were only two catalogs then I think it would maybe be possible to get round this by changing the default catalog and schema in the HSQL database to that one explicitly defined:
Is there any other in-memory database for which this might work or is there any strategy for getting the tests to run in HSQL.
I had thought of providing an orm.xml file which specified the default catalog and schema (overiding any annotations and having all the defined tables created in the default catalog/schema) however these overrides do not seem to be observed when the DDL is executed i.e. I get the same error as above.
Essentially, then I would like to run my existing tests and either somehow have the tables created as they are defined in the mappings or somehow override the catalog/schema definitions at the entity level.
I cannot think of any way to achieve either outcome. Any ideas?
I believe H2 supports catalogs. I haven't used them in it myself, but there's a CATALOGS table in the Information Schema.
I managed to achieve something like this in H2 via IGNORE_CATALOGS property and version 1.4.200
However, the url example from their docs did not seem to work for me, so I added a statement in my schema.xml:
SET IGNORE_CATALOGS = true;
I have a table called Person which I have already mapped in hibernate I has already some data which I do not want to loose. I need to add new column called address, Any idea how to do that in hibernate ?
Thanks in Advance..
If you current tables are generated by Hibernate , you can simply add the address property in the java entity class for the address column . Then set the hibernate.hbm2ddl.auto property to update and hibernate will automatically create this column when the SessionFactory is built next time . Hibernate will not change any data store in your database when hibernate.hbm2ddl.auto is update.
Or , you can manually issue the SQL to alter the table structure and then add the address property in the java entity class for the address column.
Likely you are not forced to use Hibernate to create/update database schema. I assume you have something like this in your configuration:
<property name="hibernate.hbm2ddl.auto" value="create-drop" />
Just change value to "validate", perform changes to the mappings and execute ALTER TABLE statements separately.
Other option is to use "update" to let Hibernate figure out how to update your table structure. I suggest to keep it in your hands and just execute DDL SQL manually.
You should also read this other SO question/answer: Hibernate: hbm2ddl.auto=update in production? before you set hibernate.hbm2ddl.auto to update.
Looks like jpa is something which makes me ask a lot of questions.
Having added this
<property name="toplink.ddl-generation" value="create-tables"/>
my JPA application always creates tables when running, which results in exceptions in case the tables already exist. I would like JPA to check if the tables already exist and if not create them, however I could not find a value for the property above which does this.
So if I just turn it off, is there a way to tell JPA manually at some point to create all the tables?
Update here's the exception I get
Internal Exception: com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Table 'tags' already exists
Error Code: 1050
Call: CREATE TABLE tags (ID BIGINT AUTO_INCREMENT NOT NULL, NAME VARCHAR(255), OCCURRENCE INTEGER, PRIMARY KEY (ID))
MySQLSyntaxErrorException?! Now that's wrong for sure
According to http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/ias/toplink/JPA/essentials/toplink-jpa-extensions.html#Java2DBSchemaGen toplink does not have an option to update exiting tables, I'm not sure if I would trust it to do the right thing anyway.
You could configure toplink to generate a sql script that you then would have to execute manually to create all tables. The filenames and location can be configured like this:
<property name="toplink.ddl-generation" value="create-tables"/>
<property name="toplink.ddl-generation.output-mode" value="sql-script"/>
<property name="toplink.create-ddl-jdbc-file-name" value="createDDL.sql"/>
<property name="toplink.drop-ddl-jdbc-file-name" value="dropDDL.sql"/>
<property name="toplink.application-location" value="/tmp"/>
I would like [my] JPA [provider] to check if the tables already exist and if not create them, however I could not find a value for the property above which does this.
Weird, according to the TopLink Essentials documentation about the toplink.ddl-generation extension, create-table should leave existing table unchanged:
TopLink JPA Extensions for Schema Generation
Specify what Data Descriptor Language
(DDL) generation action you want for
your JPA entities. To specify the DDL
generation target, see
toplink.ddl-generation.output-mode.
Valid values: oracle.toplink.essentials.ejb.cmp3.EntityManagerFactoryProvider
none - do not generate DDL; no
schema is generated.
create-tables - create DDL for
non-existent tables; leave existing
tables unchanged (see also
toplink.create-ddl-jdbc-file-name).
drop-and-create-tables - create DDL for all tables; drop all existing
tables (see also
toplink.create-ddl-jdbc-file-name
and
toplink.drop-ddl-jdbc-file-name).
If you are using persistence outside
the EJB container and would like to
create the DDL files without creating
tables, additionally define a Java
system property INTERACT_WITH_DB and
set its value to false.
Liquibase (http://www.liquibase.org) is good at this. It takes some time to get fully used to it, but I think it's worth the effort.
The Liquibase-way is independent of which JPA persistence provider you use. Actually, it's even database agnostic.