Are these Eclipse variables encrypted? - java

I was doing some development on Java using Eclipse. After setting the break point, but found the variables are looks like in the following image, such as a, a, what does these mean, are they encrypted?
I have done some other project, but the variables should have some readable names on them.

It looks like you are debugging code that has been obfuscated. Specifically, the AssemblerInput class. Either you obfuscated it yourself, or you are using a 3rd-party library that has been obfuscated.
Eclipse didn't do it ...
It is from some Development kit. I just run the examples, nothing with the code.
Well, the library in the development kit is obfuscated.
Any idea on how to restore that?
There is no way to restore the original symbols. The only way forward is to request a non-obfuscated version of the library from the supplier ... or find an alternative to the library.

Related

Is there a way to use external libraries in IntelliJ without downloading their .jars?

I am trying to write a standalone Java application in IntelliJ using edu.stanford.nlp.trees.GrammaticalStructure. Therefore, I have imported the module:
import edu.stanford.nlp.trees.GrammaticalStructure;
Currently, Intellij doesn't recognize this and many others of the imported external libraries (cannot resolve the symbols) and is also not able to automatically download/import them.
Is there a way to use the GrammaticalStructure class without having to download the entire Stanford CoreNLP .jar and adding it to the project as a library? This question applies to other dependencies as well, since I want to use other external libraries but avoid including their .jar files as much as possible (to minimize the size of the final application, given that it will be standalone). Unfortunately, all the solutions I have found proposed exactly that.
Apologies if I have overlooked some basic setting or setup steps, it has been a while since I have worked with Java.
Any help is greatly appreciated.
If you want to use it means you want to execute the code in them. How is the runtime supposed to execute code that is does not have? How is the compiler supposed to know how the code is defined (e.g. what the classes look like)? This is simply impossible. If you want to use the code you have to provide it to the compiler as well as the runtime.
If you just dont want to include all of that code into your application, you need either access to the sources and just pick the class you need or you need some kind of JAR minimizer as #CrazyCoder suggested.

Reading .qm translation files with Java

I'm trying to read a .qm translation files with Java.
.qm files are binary files. I don't have access to the .ts files.
And I don't find much info on these .qm files.
How are they structured ?
Regards,
There's no documentation that I know of, but if you look at QTranslator::load you should be able to follow the format of the QM file.
You will probably need to reimplement QTranslator in Java, as you need not only the ability to load the files, but also to extract and apply translations in Qt fashion.
As per request of OP:
You could use those files by using the Qt libraries and JNI. By using the translator in a c++ dll you can translate strings easily. However, you cannot extract the files or list the contained translations. But if all you need is the actual translation, this solution should work.
I cannot give a real example, because I only now how it works in theory, I haven't tried it, because it's not trivial. But if you are eager to try it out, the general idea would be:
Create a C++ dll and build it against QtCore. The easiest way is to download Qt from their website qt.io. You can for example create a default library project with QtCreator. Note: Besides Qt5Core.dll, Qt requires other libraries to correctly run. They are all included in the installation, but once you deploy your application, those of course have to be includes as well.
Include JNI to the C++ project and link against it. if you're new to this, here is a nice tutorial: Java Programming Tutorial
Create your wrapper methods. Methods in cpp you can call from java that take java strings, convert them to QString, translate them with QTranslator and convert them back.
Load the library in Java and execute those methods
Important:
First, I don't know how java handles dll dependencies. If you encounter errors while loading the dll, it's probably because dependencies of your dll are not present. Second, Qt typically requires a QCoreApplication running in the main thread for most of it's operations. I tested the translator without such an app, and it worked. So apparently for translations only the app is not required. However, depending on what you do in your dll, I think this is important to know.
If you need more details, feel free to ask.

Is it recommended to separate Scala and Java source files for a Maven project?

I've been working on a Maven project consisting entirely of Java, and lately started to mix Scala code into it.
I'm amazed by the great expressiveness Scala offers, the easy use of scala-maven-plugin, and especially the incredible interoperability between Java and Scala.
However, I hit one inconvenience; according to the Maven's convention, Java's source code goes into src/main/java, whereas Scala's into src/main/scala. I found it quite cumbersome because I have to frequently go back and forth Java and Scala source files and every time I have to traverse the deep hierarchy of package directories (I often close tabs to keep my editor from cluttered).
So the question is: Is it recommended to maintain separate directories src/main/java and src/main/scala? If so, why?
To add more background, I've been working on the web application framework Wicket, whose convention is to put the HTML files alongside with their corresponding Java files. If we keep the directories separated, naturally the HTML files are separated as well (I don't think putting Scala files and corresponding HTML files in different directories makes sense). And then it goes "why I can't find Foo.html? Oh, I was looking for the wrong directory."
The source files themselves are very easy to distinguish both by humans and by machines by inspecting their extensions. I configured pom.xml to handle both Java and Scala put together in src/main/java and it worked (compiles and runs). On the other hand, separating directories poses a risk of defining conflicting classes in Java and in Scala, a careless mistake.
Well, I don't want to name a directory java if it contained not only Java's but also Scala's. But this is the only point I can come up with for separating directories.
(Edit: I've come up with a workaround-interpretation; let us think java stands for Java Virtual Machine. In this way, having src/main/c doesn't contradict if we ever decided to use JNI because C doesn't run on JVM.)
Oh, and one more point; my project is not intended as an open-source project; development convenience is preferred than trying hard to follow conventions.
This question is inspired by this answer.
I'd say yes, re-use code as much as possible. Maybe in future you can use this Java piece somewhere else...
As you probably know, you can use Java in Scala projects but not Scala in Java projects. So in this specific example it will help you with (future?) Java projects. If you want to re-use a piece of your Java code you can do that in either Java projects as well as Scala projects.
So i.m.h.o. it doesn't stop at the src/main/... but you should really put them even in different components.
Btw, little side note: if I'm correct, Wicket allows you to put the html somewhere else too, even in a different project... I saw it being handy (only) once, where we had to create different frontend for different clients of us. The java code stayed the same, the wicket-id's as well, but the html changed everywhere. Though it did give us some problems as well using the Qwicky plugin, as it could not find the html files in our IDE anymore.

How can I use Android with Java and a core made with Scala?

I made a small project using Scala (SBT + IntellijIDEA) that provides me a set of classes and other functions that I want to use in Android. I will call this project $core.
So, keeping that in mind I tried to first only use scala. I tried to create an Android Project using android-plugin and I got it.
But what I really want is to use my $core in an Android Project AND expand the $core classes using Java. $core provides an API that I would like more people to use and they probably don't know Scala so Java would be perfect. Besides, I need to go into a safe route with Android. I saw some info that scala takes a lot of time to compile into Android and has some limitations (like with parceblles).
I already tried to use the classes in eclipse with the import class folder option. I even tried to generate a jar so at least I would have a way to run it and no success. Always the NoClassDef error when I try to use one class from the $core. I have tried to import also the scala compiler library, but didn't work out aswell...
Core isn't finished yet and I would like to develop on a single environment that allowed me to debug on the android device. How can I setup all of this?
PS: Changing to eclipse now maybe is better? Never tried android on intellijIDEA and In scala I can't debug over there, at least using ScalaCheck...
Is it possible that you are getting an noclassdeffound error when working with Scala code from java because you didn't add the Scala library to the java project or at least included the party of it that it's used in the Scala code in the jar?
Could you post the rest of the error?
You could package the core to .jar together with Scala library, use Proguard to remove all unused Scala library classes from it, and then use that jar as a regular library.

Is there any program like LINQPad for Java?

I've found LINQPad to be extremely useful when answering StackOverflow questions for C# or VB.NET. It allows me to write up some quick code, run it, and (if I want) see a nicely-formatted dump of the results. That way I can be sure that the code I post actually runs. Thus far I haven't seen anything that I can use to achieve the same result with Java. Is there anything like that out there?
I am not looking for something to query data sources; I just want a light-weight IDE. These are the features I'm particularly interested in:
The ability to write and run short snippets of code without establishing a whole project or file structure.
Reporting of compiler and runtime errors in the code when it is run.
The ability to add references to a particular editor instance.
Syntax highlighting and Autocomplete/Intellisense would be a plus.
JPad - A java scratchpad for running snippets
Since I also couldn't find one I've decided to write one. Currently it can:
Run java snippets (no class / imports / public blah... needed).
Contains drivers for MS/MySQL/Postgres.
Output results as HTML tables
It's very rough but I will add to it over time. Feedback is definitely welcome.
This may help : http://www.browxy.com:9000/codeRunner
EDIT: Url seems to have changed to http://www.browxy.com
You can use the Groovy web console ; it's possible to speak java in groovy land.
Java Snippet Runner:
Does something similar to Linqpad (jar file, not just for macs)
http://mac.softpedia.com/get/Development/Java/Java-Snippet-Runner.shtml
Code Runner (Commercial):
for Mac's only, it'll run code snippets in Java, and lots of other languages too (e.g. Objective C)
http://krillapps.com/coderunner/
http://ideone.com is an online service that has the features you want.
I've been using JEdit for a long time, which is a very powerful cross-platform editor, NOT an IDE. It does have plugins to execute Java code right in the editor, and even uses BSH for macros.
I was looking for a "Java LinqPad" also, and i came across :
this
I've been using IntelliJ IDEA and it works really well as a Groovy scratchpad. The Community Edition is free too.
You need to create a new project, but then can add Groovy scripts to it and run them on the fly. Not had any luck with the actual Scratch File functionality though.
Being a Jetbrains editor it's pretty slick too. (Unlike some of the other options)
Nothing beats LinqPad though.

Categories