Whole item distribution by ratio - java

The goal:
Say I have X workers in a fruit plantation. At the plantation they're growing apples, pears and grapes.
At the end of the day, the foreman grades each workers with a ratio. The total of all ratio's is 100. The ratio is there to determine how to distribute the fruit amongst the workers at the end of the day.
How do I distribute the fruit amongst all workers so that they each get their fair share (within a certain randomness to account for integer division). Only whole fruits are divided, so integer results. And all fruits must be given out.
I'm doing this with about 20 workers, so right now the ratio is in neighbourhood of 0.05 per worker.
What I've tried (pseudo-code):
for each worker:
if applesGiven < appleStock:
worker.give(ratio * applestock);
if pearsGiven < pearStock:
worker.give(ratio * pearStock);
if grapesGiven < grapeStock:
worker.give(ratio * grapeStock);
I would let the exact numer of [fruit] they where given be determined by a boolean Roundup that was initialized with a random boolean and switched after every fruit that was processed.
What I've tried (full-code):
public void balance() {
boolean roundUp = random.nextBoolean();
for (Employee e : employees) {
double ratio = e.getRatio();
if (applePlanned < appleNeeded) {
int apple;
if (roundUp) {
apple = (int) Math.ceil(ratio * appleNeeded);
} else {
apple = (int) Math.floor(ratio * appleNeeded);
}
e.setrapple(apple);
applePlanned += apple;
roundUp = !roundUp;
}
if (pearPlanned < pearNeeded) {
int pear;
if (roundUp) {
pear = (int) Math.ceil(ratio * pearNeeded);
} else {
pear = (int) Math.floor(ratio * pearNeeded);
}
e.setrpear(pear);
pearPlanned += pear;
roundUp = !roundUp;
}
if (grapePlanned < grapeNeeded) {
int grape;
if (roundUp) {
grape = (int) Math.ceil(ratio * grapeNeeded);
} else {
grape = (int) Math.floor(ratio * grapeNeeded);
}
e.setrgrape(grape);
grapePlanned += grape;
roundUp = !roundUp;
}
}
Problems I ran into:
Only about 3/4 of all items are distributed
When I have an even number of fruit, the boolean gets the same value at the start of each new person.
Thank you for looking into this!
Answers in java, python or pseudo-code please, that's what I can read.

Use double math, round down, then randomly hand out the remaining fruit weighted based on ratio. Note, you can make this a lot less ugly with object orientation and loops, but this is a start.
public void distribute(int apple, int pear, int grape) {
double total = apple + pear + grape;
double appleRatio = apple/total;
double pearRatio = pear/total;
double grapeRatio = grape/total;
// apple worker
int appleWorkerApple = (int) (appleRatio*apple);
int appleWorkerPear = (int) (appleRatio*pear);
int appleWorkerGrape = (int) (appleRatio*grape);
// pear worker
int pearWorkerApple = (int) (pearRatio*apple);
int pearWorkerPear = (int) (pearRatio*pear);
int pearWorkerGrape = (int) (pearRatio*grape);
// grape worker
int grapeWorkerApple = (int) (grapeRatio*apple);
int grapeWorkerPear = (int) (grapeRatio*pear);
int grapeWorkerGrape = (int) (grapeRatio*grape);
int appleRemain = apple - appleWorkerApple - pearWorkerApple - grapeWorkerApple;
int pearRemain = pear - appleWorkerApple - pearWorkerApple - grapeWorkerApple;
int grapeRemain = grape - appleWorkerApple - pearWorkerApple - grapeWorkerApple;
Random r = new Random();
while(appleRemain > 0 && pearRemain > 0 && grapeRemain > 0) {
double target = r.nextDouble();
switch(r.nextInt(3)) {
case 0:
if(appleRemain > 0) {
appleRemain--
if(target < appleRatio)
appleWorkerApple++;
else if (target < appleRatio + grapeRatio)
pearWorkerApple++;
else
grapeWorkerApple++;
}
break;
case 1:
if(grapeRemain > 0)
// etc.
}
}
}

It's not particularly useful 'cause I've overused Numpy but I'll share since it's relevant
import numpy
import random
# apple, bannana, grapes, guava, melon, pear
fruits = numpy.array([100, 150, 175, 200, 230, 247])
# Bill, Bob, Dan, Fred, Joe
ratios = numpy.array([21, 7, 32, 13, 27])
# Original fruit amount for each worker: 0
worker_fruits = numpy.zeros((5, 6), dtype=int)
worker_lucky = numpy.zeros((5, 6), dtype=float)
# For each worker with his ratio
for worker, lucky, ratio in zip(worker_fruits, worker_lucky, ratios):
# Give him fruits, storing partials as weighting
to_give = (ratio * fruits) / 100
lucky += to_give % 1
worker += to_give
# Calculate how much we have left over
spares = fruits - worker_fruits.sum(axis=0)
# Share it out in a weighted distribution
for fruit, lucky, numspare in zip(worker_fruits.transpose(), worker_lucky.transpose(), spares):
if numspare:
indexes = numpy.arange(len(fruit))
add_to = numpy.random.choice(indexes, replace=False, size=numspare, p=lucky/numspare)
fruit[add_to] += 1
# Our results!
worker_fruits
#>>> array([[21, 31, 36, 42, 49, 51],
#>>> [ 7, 11, 12, 14, 16, 18],
#>>> [32, 48, 56, 64, 74, 79],
#>>> [13, 19, 23, 26, 29, 32],
#>>> [27, 41, 48, 54, 62, 67]])
# Proof it's perfectly shared
fruits - worker_fruits.sum(axis=0)
#>>> array([0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0])

Related

What is the range of improved Perlin noise?

I'm trying to find the theoretical output range of improved Perlin noise for 1, 2 and 3 dimensions. I'm aware of existing answers to this question, but they don't seem to accord with my practical findings.
If n is the number of dimensions then according to [1] it should be [-sqrt(n/4), sqrt(n/4)]. According to [2] (which refers to [3]) it should be [-0.5·sqrt(n), 0.5·sqrt(n)] (which amounts to the same thing).
This means that the ranges should be approximately:
Dimensions
Range
1
[-0.5, 0.5]
2
[-0.707, 0.707]
3
[-0.866, 0.866]
However when I run the following code (which uses Ken Perlin's own reference implementation of improved noise from his website), I get higher values for 2 and 3 dimensions, namely approximately:
Dimensions
Range
1
[-0.5, 0.5]
2
[-0.891, 0.999]
3
[-0.997, 0.999]
With different permutations I even sometimes get values slightly over 1.0 for 3 dimensions, and for some strange reason one of the bounds for two dimension always seems to be about 0.89 while the other is about 1.00.
I can't figure out whether this is due to a bug in my code (I don't see how since this is Ken Perlin's own code) or due to those discussions not being correct or not being applicable somehow, in which case I would like to know what the theoretical ranges are for improved Perlin noise.
Can you replicate this? Are the results wrong, or can you point me to a discussion of the theoretical values that accords with this outcome?
The code:
public class PerlinTest {
public static void main(String[] args) {
double lowest1DValue = Double.MAX_VALUE, highest1DValue = -Double.MAX_VALUE;
double lowest2DValue = Double.MAX_VALUE, highest2DValue = -Double.MAX_VALUE;
double lowest3DValue = Double.MAX_VALUE, highest3DValue = -Double.MAX_VALUE;
final Random random = new SecureRandom();
for (int i = 0; i < 10000000; i++) {
double value = noise(random.nextDouble() * 256.0, 0.0, 0.0);
if (value < lowest1DValue) {
lowest1DValue = value;
}
if (value > highest1DValue) {
highest1DValue = value;
}
value = noise(random.nextDouble() * 256.0, random.nextDouble() * 256.0, 0.0);
if (value < lowest2DValue) {
lowest2DValue = value;
}
if (value > highest2DValue) {
highest2DValue = value;
}
value = noise(random.nextDouble() * 256.0, random.nextDouble() * 256.0, random.nextDouble() * 256.0);
if (value < lowest3DValue) {
lowest3DValue = value;
}
if (value > highest3DValue) {
highest3DValue = value;
}
}
System.out.println("Lowest 1D value: " + lowest1DValue);
System.out.println("Highest 1D value: " + highest1DValue);
System.out.println("Lowest 2D value: " + lowest2DValue);
System.out.println("Highest 2D value: " + highest2DValue);
System.out.println("Lowest 3D value: " + lowest3DValue);
System.out.println("Highest 3D value: " + highest3DValue);
}
static public double noise(double x, double y, double z) {
int X = (int)Math.floor(x) & 255, // FIND UNIT CUBE THAT
Y = (int)Math.floor(y) & 255, // CONTAINS POINT.
Z = (int)Math.floor(z) & 255;
x -= Math.floor(x); // FIND RELATIVE X,Y,Z
y -= Math.floor(y); // OF POINT IN CUBE.
z -= Math.floor(z);
double u = fade(x), // COMPUTE FADE CURVES
v = fade(y), // FOR EACH OF X,Y,Z.
w = fade(z);
int A = p[X ]+Y, AA = p[A]+Z, AB = p[A+1]+Z, // HASH COORDINATES OF
B = p[X+1]+Y, BA = p[B]+Z, BB = p[B+1]+Z; // THE 8 CUBE CORNERS,
return lerp(w, lerp(v, lerp(u, grad(p[AA ], x , y , z ), // AND ADD
grad(p[BA ], x-1, y , z )), // BLENDED
lerp(u, grad(p[AB ], x , y-1, z ), // RESULTS
grad(p[BB ], x-1, y-1, z ))),// FROM 8
lerp(v, lerp(u, grad(p[AA+1], x , y , z-1 ), // CORNERS
grad(p[BA+1], x-1, y , z-1 )), // OF CUBE
lerp(u, grad(p[AB+1], x , y-1, z-1 ),
grad(p[BB+1], x-1, y-1, z-1 ))));
}
static double fade(double t) { return t * t * t * (t * (t * 6 - 15) + 10); }
static double lerp(double t, double a, double b) { return a + t * (b - a); }
static double grad(int hash, double x, double y, double z) {
int h = hash & 15; // CONVERT LO 4 BITS OF HASH CODE
double u = h<8 ? x : y, // INTO 12 GRADIENT DIRECTIONS.
v = h<4 ? y : h==12||h==14 ? x : z;
return ((h&1) == 0 ? u : -u) + ((h&2) == 0 ? v : -v);
}
static final int p[] = new int[512], permutation[] = { 151,160,137,91,90,15,
131,13,201,95,96,53,194,233,7,225,140,36,103,30,69,142,8,99,37,240,21,10,23,
190, 6,148,247,120,234,75,0,26,197,62,94,252,219,203,117,35,11,32,57,177,33,
88,237,149,56,87,174,20,125,136,171,168, 68,175,74,165,71,134,139,48,27,166,
77,146,158,231,83,111,229,122,60,211,133,230,220,105,92,41,55,46,245,40,244,
102,143,54, 65,25,63,161, 1,216,80,73,209,76,132,187,208, 89,18,169,200,196,
135,130,116,188,159,86,164,100,109,198,173,186, 3,64,52,217,226,250,124,123,
5,202,38,147,118,126,255,82,85,212,207,206,59,227,47,16,58,17,182,189,28,42,
223,183,170,213,119,248,152, 2,44,154,163, 70,221,153,101,155,167, 43,172,9,
129,22,39,253, 19,98,108,110,79,113,224,232,178,185, 112,104,218,246,97,228,
251,34,242,193,238,210,144,12,191,179,162,241, 81,51,145,235,249,14,239,107,
49,192,214, 31,181,199,106,157,184, 84,204,176,115,121,50,45,127, 4,150,254,
138,236,205,93,222,114,67,29,24,72,243,141,128,195,78,66,215,61,156,180
};
static { for (int i=0; i < 256 ; i++) p[256+i] = p[i] = permutation[i]; }
}
Ken’s not using unit vectors. As [1] says, with my emphasis:
Third, there are many different ways to select the random vectors at the grid cell corners. In Improved Perlin noise, instead of selecting any random vector, one of 12 vectors pointing to the edges of a cube are used instead. Here, I will talk strictly about a continuous range of angles since it is easier – however, the range of value of an implementation of Perlin noise using a restricted set of vectors will never be larger. Finally, the script in this repository assumes the vectors are of unit length. If they not, the range of value should be scaled according to the maximum vector length. Note that the vectors in Improved Perlin noise are not unit length.
For Ken’s improved noise, the maximum vector length is 1 in 1D and √2 in 2D, so the theoretical bounds are [−0.5, 0.5] in 1D and [−1, 1] in 2D. I don’t know why you’re not seeing the full range in 2D; if you shuffled the permutation I bet you would sometimes.
For 3D, the maximum vector length is still √2, but the extreme case identified by [1] isn’t a possible output, so the theoretical range of [−√(3/2), √(3/2)] is an overestimate. These folks tried to work it out exactly, and yes, the maximum absolute value does seem to be strictly greater than 1.

Floyd-Steinberg algorithm implementation in Java

I'm trying to implement Floyd Steinberg algorithm in Java, working with java.awt.image.BufferedImage.
I've used the algorithm described here
with a custom palette, and I was expecting to get more or less the same image as in the wikipedia example (or as generated by Gimp for example), but I get a very different version.
You can see what I get
I'm obviously missing something (output image has color which doesn't belong to my palette), but I can't figure out what.
What I'm doing wrong ?
Here's the code :
import javax.imageio.ImageIO;
import java.awt.*;
import java.awt.image.BufferedImage;
import java.awt.image.IndexColorModel;
import java.io.File;
import java.io.IOException;
public class FloydSteinbergTest {
private static final Color[] PALETTE = new Color[]{
new Color(221, 221, 221),
new Color(19, 125, 62),
new Color(179, 80, 188),
new Color(107, 138, 201),
new Color(177, 166, 39),
new Color(65, 174, 56),
new Color(208, 132, 153),
new Color(64, 64, 64),
new Color(154, 161, 161),
new Color(46, 110, 137),
new Color(126, 61, 181),
new Color(46, 56, 141),
new Color(79, 50, 31),
new Color(53, 70, 27),
new Color(150, 52, 48),
new Color(25, 22, 22)};
public static void main(String[] args) {
String lImgFile = "/tmp/test.jpg";
try {
// Load image
BufferedImage lImage = ImageIO.read(new File(lImgFile));
BufferedImage lOutImage = applyDitheredPalette(lImage, PALETTE);
ImageIO.write(lOutImage, "png", new File("/tmp/out.png"));
} catch (IOException lEx) {
System.out.println(lEx.getMessage());
}
}
/**
* #param pPalette Color palette to apply.
* #param pImage Image to apply palette on.
* #return {#link java.awt.image.BufferedImage} corresponding to pPalette applied on pImage using naive Floyd-Steinberg implementation
*/
public static BufferedImage applyDitheredPalette(BufferedImage pImage, Color[] pPalette) {
int lWidth = pImage.getWidth();
int lHeight = pImage.getHeight();
IndexColorModel lColorModel = paletteToColorModel(pPalette);
BufferedImage lImageOut = new BufferedImage(lWidth, lHeight, BufferedImage.TYPE_BYTE_INDEXED, lColorModel);
for (int y = (lHeight - 1); y >= 0; y--) {
for (int x = 0; x < lWidth; x++) {
// Get original pixel color channels
int lInitialPixelColor = pImage.getRGB(x, y);
// Finding nearest color in the palette
Color lNearestColor = getNearestColor(lInitialPixelColor, pPalette);
// Set quantized pixel
lImageOut.setRGB(x, y, lNearestColor.getRGB());
// Applying Floyd-Steinberg dithering
int quantizationError = lInitialPixelColor - lNearestColor.getRGB();
if ((x + 1) < lWidth) {
int lPixel = pImage.getRGB(x + 1, y);
lImageOut.setRGB(x + 1, y, lPixel + (quantizationError * (7 / 16)));
}
if ((x - 1) > 0 && (y + 1) < lHeight) {
int lPixel = pImage.getRGB(x - 1, y + 1);
lImageOut.setRGB(x - 1, y + 1, lPixel + (quantizationError * (3 / 16)));
}
if ((y + 1) < lHeight) {
int lPixel = pImage.getRGB(x, y + 1);
lImageOut.setRGB(x, y + 1, lPixel + (quantizationError * (5 / 16)));
}
if ((x + 1 < lWidth) && (y + 1 < lHeight)) {
int lPixel = pImage.getRGB(x + 1, y + 1);
lImageOut.setRGB(x + 1, y + 1, lPixel + (quantizationError * (1 / 16)));
}
// End of Floyd-Steinberg dithering
}
}
return lImageOut;
}
/**
* #param pPalette to load color model from
* #return {#link java.awt.image.IndexColorModel} Color model initialized using pPalette colors
*/
private static IndexColorModel paletteToColorModel(Color[] pPalette) {
int lSize = pPalette.length;
// Getting color component for each palette color
byte[] lReds = new byte[lSize];
byte[] lGreens = new byte[lSize];
byte[] lBlues = new byte[lSize];
for (int i = 0; i < lSize; i++) {
Color lColor = pPalette[i];
lReds[i] = (byte) lColor.getRed();
lGreens[i] = (byte) lColor.getGreen();
lBlues[i] = (byte) lColor.getBlue();
}
return new IndexColorModel(4, lSize, lReds, lGreens, lBlues);
}
/**
* #param pColor Color to approximate
* #param pPalette Color palette to use for quantization
* #return {#link java.awt.Color} nearest from pColor value took in pPalette
*/
private static Color getNearestColor(int pColor, Color[] pPalette) {
Color lNearestColor = null;
double lNearestDistance = Integer.MAX_VALUE;
double lTempDist;
for (Color lColor : pPalette) {
Color lRgb = new Color(pColor);
lTempDist = distance(lRgb.getRed(), lRgb.getGreen(), lRgb.getBlue(), lColor.getRed(), lColor.getGreen(), lColor.getBlue());
if (lTempDist < lNearestDistance) {
lNearestDistance = lTempDist;
lNearestColor = lColor;
}
}
return lNearestColor;
}
/**
* #return Distance between 2 pixels color channels.
*/
private static double distance(int pR1, int pG1, int pB1, int pR2, int pG2, int pB2) {
double lDist = Math.pow(pR1 - pR2, 2) + Math.pow(pG1 - pG2, 2) + Math.pow(pB1 - pB2, 2);
return Math.sqrt(lDist);
}}
This site is for questions, not for debugging. But as an attempt to at least answer the question "What I'm doing wrong?":
The term (7 / 16) will perform an integer division, and the result will be 0. Use (7.0 / 16.0) instead
You may not do arithmetic with RGB values! When you have an RGB value like 0x000000FF (blue) and you multiply it with 256, then the result will be 0x0000FF00 (green). The computations like lPixel + (quantizationError * (3.0 / 16.0) have to be done separately for the R, G and B channel
You're processing the image from the bottom to the top. Then distributing the error among the lower right pixels (as it is described on the wikipedia site) does not longer make sense. Change your loops from
for (int y = (lHeight - 1); y >= 0; y--)
to
for (int y = 0; y < lHeight; y++)
You can not store the quantization error directly in the pixels of BufferedImage, because the error may also be negative. The image can not handle this. (I also have doubts about your color model, but this is only a gut feeling)
The image that you described as the "expected result" contains colors that definitely are not contained in your palette.
Finally: Have a look at https://stackoverflow.com/a/5940260/3182664

Calculating the slope of a series of values

I have 2 arrays of equal length. The following function attempts to calculate the slope using these arrays. It returns the average of the slope between each points. For the following data set, I seem to be getting different values than Excel and Google Docs.
double[] x_values = { 1932, 1936, 1948, 1952, 1956, 1960, 1964, 1968,
1972, 1976, 1980 };
double[] y_values = { 197, 203, 198, 204, 212, 216, 218, 224, 223, 225,
236 };
public static double getSlope(double[] x_values, double[] y_values)
throws Exception {
if (x_values.length != y_values.length)
throw new Exception();
double slope = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < (x_values.length - 1); i++) {
double y_2 = y_values[i + 1];
double y_1 = y_values[i];
double delta_y = y_2 - y_1;
double x_2 = x_values[i + 1];
double x_1 = x_values[i];
double delta_x = x_2 - x_1;
slope += delta_y / delta_x;
}
System.out.println(x_values.length);
return slope / (x_values.length);
}
Output
Google: 0.755
getSlope(): 0.962121212121212
Excel: 0.7501
I bet the other two methods are computing the least-squares fit, whereas you are not.
When I verify this conjecture using R, I too get the slope of about 0.755:
> summary(lm(y~x))
Call:
lm(formula = y ~ x)
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) -1.265e+03 1.793e+02 -7.053 5.97e-05 ***
x 7.551e-01 9.155e-02 8.247 1.73e-05 ***
The relevant number is the 7.551e-01. It is also worth noting that the line has an intercept of about -1265.
Here is a picture of the least-squares fit:
As to implementing this in your code, see Compute least squares using java
This function will not help you much, as it does not take into account the breadths of the various line segments. Consider the differences in applying it to the points (0,0), (1000,1000), and (1001, 2000) versus (0,0), (1,1), and (2, 1001). Both cases have successive slopes 1 and 1000, yet they look greatly different.
You need to implement the method of least squares: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Least_squares to find the line that best approximates your data set.
One more piece of advice: never throw a java.lang.Exception. Always choose a more-specific exception, even if you must write the class yourself. People using your code will need to handle java.lang.Exception, which interferes badly with their other code.
Edit: use Apache Commons Math class SimpleRegression if that's an option.
Else, here's a method that calculates slope and also intercept, should yield the same results as excel and apache:
private static double intercept(List<Double> yList, List<Double> xList) {
if (yList.size() != xList.size())
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Number of y and x must be the same");
if (yList.size() < 2)
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Need at least 2 y, x");
double yAvg = average(yList);
double xAvg = average(xList);
double sumNumerator = 0d;
double sumDenominator = 0d;
for (int i = 0; i < yList.size(); i++) {
double y = yList.get(i);
double x = xList.get(i);
double yDiff = y - yAvg;
double xDiff = x - xAvg;
double numerator = xDiff * yDiff;
double denominator = xDiff * xDiff;
sumNumerator += numerator;
sumDenominator += denominator;
}
double slope = sumNumerator / sumDenominator;
double intercept = yAvg - (slope * xAvg);
return intercept;
}
private static double average(Collection<Double> doubles) {
return doubles.stream().collect(Collectors.averagingDouble(d -> d));
}
Sources:
Excel doc for SLOPE
Excel doc for INTERCEPT
You should be dividing by x_values.length - 1 . Number of slopes is pairwise.
Edit : Wiki example in my comments shows how to calculate the alpha and beta which determines the slope of the linear regression line.

Drawing star shapes with variable parameters

I have task to write program allowing users to draw stars, which can differ in size and amount of arms. When I was dealing with basic stars I was doing it with GeneralPath and tables of points :
int xPoints[] = { 55, 67, 109, 73, 83, 55, 27, 37, 1, 43 };
int yPoints[] = { 0, 36, 36, 54, 96, 72, 96, 54, 36, 36 };
Graphics2D g2d = ( Graphics2D ) g;
GeneralPath star = new GeneralPath();
star.moveTo( xPoints[ 0 ], yPoints[ 0 ] );
for ( int k = 1; k < xPoints.length; k++ )
star.lineTo( xPoints[ k ], yPoints[ k ] );
star.closePath();
g2d.fill( star );
What method should I choose for drawing stars with variable inner and outer radius, as well as different amount of arms ? This is what I should obtain :
alt text http://img228.imageshack.us/img228/6427/lab6c.jpg
Having n arms means you end up with 2n vertices, the even ones are on the outer circle, and the odd ones on the inner circle. Viewed from the center, the vertices are at evenly spaced angles (the angle is 2*PI/2*n = Pi/n). On an unit circle (r=1), the x,y coordinates of the points i=0..n is cos(x),sin(x). Multiply those coordinates with the respective radius (rOuter or rInner, depending of whether i is odd or even), and add that vector to the center of the star to get the coordinates for each vertex in the star path.
Here's the function to create a star shape with given number of arms, center coordinate and outer, inner radius:
public static Shape createStar(int arms, Point center, double rOuter, double rInner) {
double angle = Math.PI / arms;
GeneralPath path = new GeneralPath();
for (int i = 0; i < 2 * arms; i++) {
double r = (i & 1) == 0 ? rOuter : rInner;
Point2D.Double p = new Point2D.Double(
center.x + Math.cos(i * angle) * r,
center.y + Math.sin(i * angle) * r);
if (i == 0) {
path.moveTo(p.getX(), p.getY());
}
else {
path.lineTo(p.getX(), p.getY());
}
}
path.closePath();
return path;
}
I think you should use the same classes (GeneralPath), but here you should focus on how to compute the vertex coordinates.
The first thing that comes to my mind is positioning 2N points on a circle of radius R1, centered at (0,0). Then, "strech" every odd vertex by multiplying its vector by c. The constant c should be equal to R2/R1 (i.e. the proportion of inner and outer radiuses).
But maybe there is a simpler solution...
Here's an example of finding equally spaced points on a circle that may help. Just make the number of points, n, a parameter in the constructor.
private int n;
...
public CircleTest(int n) {
...
this.n = n;
}
...
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
double t = 2 * Math.PI * i / n;
...
}

How to automatically generate N "distinct" colors?

I wrote the two methods below to automatically select N distinct colors. It works by defining a piecewise linear function on the RGB cube. The benefit of this is you can also get a progressive scale if that's what you want, but when N gets large the colors can start to look similar. I can also imagine evenly subdividing the RGB cube into a lattice and then drawing points. Does anyone know any other methods? I'm ruling out defining a list and then just cycling through it. I should also say I don't generally care if they clash or don't look nice, they just have to be visually distinct.
public static List<Color> pick(int num) {
List<Color> colors = new ArrayList<Color>();
if (num < 2)
return colors;
float dx = 1.0f / (float) (num - 1);
for (int i = 0; i < num; i++) {
colors.add(get(i * dx));
}
return colors;
}
public static Color get(float x) {
float r = 0.0f;
float g = 0.0f;
float b = 1.0f;
if (x >= 0.0f && x < 0.2f) {
x = x / 0.2f;
r = 0.0f;
g = x;
b = 1.0f;
} else if (x >= 0.2f && x < 0.4f) {
x = (x - 0.2f) / 0.2f;
r = 0.0f;
g = 1.0f;
b = 1.0f - x;
} else if (x >= 0.4f && x < 0.6f) {
x = (x - 0.4f) / 0.2f;
r = x;
g = 1.0f;
b = 0.0f;
} else if (x >= 0.6f && x < 0.8f) {
x = (x - 0.6f) / 0.2f;
r = 1.0f;
g = 1.0f - x;
b = 0.0f;
} else if (x >= 0.8f && x <= 1.0f) {
x = (x - 0.8f) / 0.2f;
r = 1.0f;
g = 0.0f;
b = x;
}
return new Color(r, g, b);
}
This questions appears in quite a few SO discussions:
Algorithm For Generating Unique Colors
Generate unique colours
Generate distinctly different RGB colors in graphs
How to generate n different colors for any natural number n?
Different solutions are proposed, but none are optimal. Luckily, science comes to the rescue
Arbitrary N
Colour displays for categorical images (free download)
A WEB SERVICE TO PERSONALISE MAP COLOURING (free download, a webservice solution should be available by next month)
An Algorithm for the Selection of High-Contrast Color Sets (the authors offer a free C++ implementation)
High-contrast sets of colors (The first algorithm for the problem)
The last 2 will be free via most university libraries / proxies.
N is finite and relatively small
In this case, one could go for a list solution. A very interesting article in the subject is freely available:
A Colour Alphabet and the Limits of Colour Coding
There are several color lists to consider:
Boynton's list of 11 colors that are almost never confused (available in the first paper of the previous section)
Kelly's 22 colors of maximum contrast (available in the paper above)
I also ran into this Palette by an MIT student.
Lastly, The following links may be useful in converting between different color systems / coordinates (some colors in the articles are not specified in RGB, for instance):
http://chem8.org/uch/space-55036-do-blog-id-5333.html
https://metacpan.org/pod/Color::Library::Dictionary::NBS_ISCC
Color Theory: How to convert Munsell HVC to RGB/HSB/HSL
For Kelly's and Boynton's list, I've already made the conversion to RGB (with the exception of white and black, which should be obvious). Some C# code:
public static ReadOnlyCollection<Color> KellysMaxContrastSet
{
get { return _kellysMaxContrastSet.AsReadOnly(); }
}
private static readonly List<Color> _kellysMaxContrastSet = new List<Color>
{
UIntToColor(0xFFFFB300), //Vivid Yellow
UIntToColor(0xFF803E75), //Strong Purple
UIntToColor(0xFFFF6800), //Vivid Orange
UIntToColor(0xFFA6BDD7), //Very Light Blue
UIntToColor(0xFFC10020), //Vivid Red
UIntToColor(0xFFCEA262), //Grayish Yellow
UIntToColor(0xFF817066), //Medium Gray
//The following will not be good for people with defective color vision
UIntToColor(0xFF007D34), //Vivid Green
UIntToColor(0xFFF6768E), //Strong Purplish Pink
UIntToColor(0xFF00538A), //Strong Blue
UIntToColor(0xFFFF7A5C), //Strong Yellowish Pink
UIntToColor(0xFF53377A), //Strong Violet
UIntToColor(0xFFFF8E00), //Vivid Orange Yellow
UIntToColor(0xFFB32851), //Strong Purplish Red
UIntToColor(0xFFF4C800), //Vivid Greenish Yellow
UIntToColor(0xFF7F180D), //Strong Reddish Brown
UIntToColor(0xFF93AA00), //Vivid Yellowish Green
UIntToColor(0xFF593315), //Deep Yellowish Brown
UIntToColor(0xFFF13A13), //Vivid Reddish Orange
UIntToColor(0xFF232C16), //Dark Olive Green
};
public static ReadOnlyCollection<Color> BoyntonOptimized
{
get { return _boyntonOptimized.AsReadOnly(); }
}
private static readonly List<Color> _boyntonOptimized = new List<Color>
{
Color.FromArgb(0, 0, 255), //Blue
Color.FromArgb(255, 0, 0), //Red
Color.FromArgb(0, 255, 0), //Green
Color.FromArgb(255, 255, 0), //Yellow
Color.FromArgb(255, 0, 255), //Magenta
Color.FromArgb(255, 128, 128), //Pink
Color.FromArgb(128, 128, 128), //Gray
Color.FromArgb(128, 0, 0), //Brown
Color.FromArgb(255, 128, 0), //Orange
};
static public Color UIntToColor(uint color)
{
var a = (byte)(color >> 24);
var r = (byte)(color >> 16);
var g = (byte)(color >> 8);
var b = (byte)(color >> 0);
return Color.FromArgb(a, r, g, b);
}
And here are the RGB values in hex and 8-bit-per-channel representations:
kelly_colors_hex = [
0xFFB300, # Vivid Yellow
0x803E75, # Strong Purple
0xFF6800, # Vivid Orange
0xA6BDD7, # Very Light Blue
0xC10020, # Vivid Red
0xCEA262, # Grayish Yellow
0x817066, # Medium Gray
# The following don't work well for people with defective color vision
0x007D34, # Vivid Green
0xF6768E, # Strong Purplish Pink
0x00538A, # Strong Blue
0xFF7A5C, # Strong Yellowish Pink
0x53377A, # Strong Violet
0xFF8E00, # Vivid Orange Yellow
0xB32851, # Strong Purplish Red
0xF4C800, # Vivid Greenish Yellow
0x7F180D, # Strong Reddish Brown
0x93AA00, # Vivid Yellowish Green
0x593315, # Deep Yellowish Brown
0xF13A13, # Vivid Reddish Orange
0x232C16, # Dark Olive Green
]
kelly_colors = dict(vivid_yellow=(255, 179, 0),
strong_purple=(128, 62, 117),
vivid_orange=(255, 104, 0),
very_light_blue=(166, 189, 215),
vivid_red=(193, 0, 32),
grayish_yellow=(206, 162, 98),
medium_gray=(129, 112, 102),
# these aren't good for people with defective color vision:
vivid_green=(0, 125, 52),
strong_purplish_pink=(246, 118, 142),
strong_blue=(0, 83, 138),
strong_yellowish_pink=(255, 122, 92),
strong_violet=(83, 55, 122),
vivid_orange_yellow=(255, 142, 0),
strong_purplish_red=(179, 40, 81),
vivid_greenish_yellow=(244, 200, 0),
strong_reddish_brown=(127, 24, 13),
vivid_yellowish_green=(147, 170, 0),
deep_yellowish_brown=(89, 51, 21),
vivid_reddish_orange=(241, 58, 19),
dark_olive_green=(35, 44, 22))
For all you Java developers, here are the JavaFX colors:
// Don't forget to import javafx.scene.paint.Color;
private static final Color[] KELLY_COLORS = {
Color.web("0xFFB300"), // Vivid Yellow
Color.web("0x803E75"), // Strong Purple
Color.web("0xFF6800"), // Vivid Orange
Color.web("0xA6BDD7"), // Very Light Blue
Color.web("0xC10020"), // Vivid Red
Color.web("0xCEA262"), // Grayish Yellow
Color.web("0x817066"), // Medium Gray
Color.web("0x007D34"), // Vivid Green
Color.web("0xF6768E"), // Strong Purplish Pink
Color.web("0x00538A"), // Strong Blue
Color.web("0xFF7A5C"), // Strong Yellowish Pink
Color.web("0x53377A"), // Strong Violet
Color.web("0xFF8E00"), // Vivid Orange Yellow
Color.web("0xB32851"), // Strong Purplish Red
Color.web("0xF4C800"), // Vivid Greenish Yellow
Color.web("0x7F180D"), // Strong Reddish Brown
Color.web("0x93AA00"), // Vivid Yellowish Green
Color.web("0x593315"), // Deep Yellowish Brown
Color.web("0xF13A13"), // Vivid Reddish Orange
Color.web("0x232C16"), // Dark Olive Green
};
the following is the unsorted kelly colors according to the order above.
the following is the sorted kelly colors according to hues (note that some yellows are not very contrasting)
You can use the HSL color model to create your colors.
If all you want is differing hues (likely), and slight variations on lightness or saturation, you can distribute the hues like so:
// assumes hue [0, 360), saturation [0, 100), lightness [0, 100)
for(i = 0; i < 360; i += 360 / num_colors) {
HSLColor c;
c.hue = i;
c.saturation = 90 + randf() * 10;
c.lightness = 50 + randf() * 10;
addColor(c);
}
Like Uri Cohen's answer, but is a generator instead. Will start by using colors far apart. Deterministic.
Sample, left colors first:
#!/usr/bin/env python3
from typing import Iterable, Tuple
import colorsys
import itertools
from fractions import Fraction
from pprint import pprint
def zenos_dichotomy() -> Iterable[Fraction]:
"""
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1/2_%2B_1/4_%2B_1/8_%2B_1/16_%2B_%C2%B7_%C2%B7_%C2%B7
"""
for k in itertools.count():
yield Fraction(1,2**k)
def fracs() -> Iterable[Fraction]:
"""
[Fraction(0, 1), Fraction(1, 2), Fraction(1, 4), Fraction(3, 4), Fraction(1, 8), Fraction(3, 8), Fraction(5, 8), Fraction(7, 8), Fraction(1, 16), Fraction(3, 16), ...]
[0.0, 0.5, 0.25, 0.75, 0.125, 0.375, 0.625, 0.875, 0.0625, 0.1875, ...]
"""
yield Fraction(0)
for k in zenos_dichotomy():
i = k.denominator # [1,2,4,8,16,...]
for j in range(1,i,2):
yield Fraction(j,i)
# can be used for the v in hsv to map linear values 0..1 to something that looks equidistant
# bias = lambda x: (math.sqrt(x/3)/Fraction(2,3)+Fraction(1,3))/Fraction(6,5)
HSVTuple = Tuple[Fraction, Fraction, Fraction]
RGBTuple = Tuple[float, float, float]
def hue_to_tones(h: Fraction) -> Iterable[HSVTuple]:
for s in [Fraction(6,10)]: # optionally use range
for v in [Fraction(8,10),Fraction(5,10)]: # could use range too
yield (h, s, v) # use bias for v here if you use range
def hsv_to_rgb(x: HSVTuple) -> RGBTuple:
return colorsys.hsv_to_rgb(*map(float, x))
flatten = itertools.chain.from_iterable
def hsvs() -> Iterable[HSVTuple]:
return flatten(map(hue_to_tones, fracs()))
def rgbs() -> Iterable[RGBTuple]:
return map(hsv_to_rgb, hsvs())
def rgb_to_css(x: RGBTuple) -> str:
uint8tuple = map(lambda y: int(y*255), x)
return "rgb({},{},{})".format(*uint8tuple)
def css_colors() -> Iterable[str]:
return map(rgb_to_css, rgbs())
if __name__ == "__main__":
# sample 100 colors in css format
sample_colors = list(itertools.islice(css_colors(), 100))
pprint(sample_colors)
For the sake of generations to come I add here the accepted answer in Python.
import numpy as np
import colorsys
def _get_colors(num_colors):
colors=[]
for i in np.arange(0., 360., 360. / num_colors):
hue = i/360.
lightness = (50 + np.random.rand() * 10)/100.
saturation = (90 + np.random.rand() * 10)/100.
colors.append(colorsys.hls_to_rgb(hue, lightness, saturation))
return colors
Here's an idea. Imagine an HSV cylinder
Define the upper and lower limits you want for the Brightness and Saturation. This defines a square cross section ring within the space.
Now, scatter N points randomly within this space.
Then apply an iterative repulsion algorithm on them, either for a fixed number of iterations, or until the points stabilise.
Now you should have N points representing N colours that are about as different as possible within the colour space you're interested in.
Hugo
Everyone seems to have missed the existence of the very useful YUV color space which was designed to represent perceived color differences in the human visual system. Distances in YUV represent differences in human perception. I needed this functionality for MagicCube4D which implements 4-dimensional Rubik's cubes and an unlimited numbers of other 4D twisty puzzles having arbitrary numbers of faces.
My solution starts by selecting random points in YUV and then iteratively breaking up the closest two points, and only converting to RGB when returning the result. The method is O(n^3) but that doesn't matter for small numbers or ones that can be cached. It can certainly be made more efficient but the results appear to be excellent.
The function allows for optional specification of brightness thresholds so as not to produce colors in which no component is brighter or darker than given amounts. IE you may not want values close to black or white. This is useful when the resulting colors will be used as base colors that are later shaded via lighting, layering, transparency, etc. and must still appear different from their base colors.
import java.awt.Color;
import java.util.Random;
/**
* Contains a method to generate N visually distinct colors and helper methods.
*
* #author Melinda Green
*/
public class ColorUtils {
private ColorUtils() {} // To disallow instantiation.
private final static float
U_OFF = .436f,
V_OFF = .615f;
private static final long RAND_SEED = 0;
private static Random rand = new Random(RAND_SEED);
/*
* Returns an array of ncolors RGB triplets such that each is as unique from the rest as possible
* and each color has at least one component greater than minComponent and one less than maxComponent.
* Use min == 1 and max == 0 to include the full RGB color range.
*
* Warning: O N^2 algorithm blows up fast for more than 100 colors.
*/
public static Color[] generateVisuallyDistinctColors(int ncolors, float minComponent, float maxComponent) {
rand.setSeed(RAND_SEED); // So that we get consistent results for each combination of inputs
float[][] yuv = new float[ncolors][3];
// initialize array with random colors
for(int got = 0; got < ncolors;) {
System.arraycopy(randYUVinRGBRange(minComponent, maxComponent), 0, yuv[got++], 0, 3);
}
// continually break up the worst-fit color pair until we get tired of searching
for(int c = 0; c < ncolors * 1000; c++) {
float worst = 8888;
int worstID = 0;
for(int i = 1; i < yuv.length; i++) {
for(int j = 0; j < i; j++) {
float dist = sqrdist(yuv[i], yuv[j]);
if(dist < worst) {
worst = dist;
worstID = i;
}
}
}
float[] best = randYUVBetterThan(worst, minComponent, maxComponent, yuv);
if(best == null)
break;
else
yuv[worstID] = best;
}
Color[] rgbs = new Color[yuv.length];
for(int i = 0; i < yuv.length; i++) {
float[] rgb = new float[3];
yuv2rgb(yuv[i][0], yuv[i][1], yuv[i][2], rgb);
rgbs[i] = new Color(rgb[0], rgb[1], rgb[2]);
//System.out.println(rgb[i][0] + "\t" + rgb[i][1] + "\t" + rgb[i][2]);
}
return rgbs;
}
public static void hsv2rgb(float h, float s, float v, float[] rgb) {
// H is given on [0->6] or -1. S and V are given on [0->1].
// RGB are each returned on [0->1].
float m, n, f;
int i;
float[] hsv = new float[3];
hsv[0] = h;
hsv[1] = s;
hsv[2] = v;
System.out.println("H: " + h + " S: " + s + " V:" + v);
if(hsv[0] == -1) {
rgb[0] = rgb[1] = rgb[2] = hsv[2];
return;
}
i = (int) (Math.floor(hsv[0]));
f = hsv[0] - i;
if(i % 2 == 0)
f = 1 - f; // if i is even
m = hsv[2] * (1 - hsv[1]);
n = hsv[2] * (1 - hsv[1] * f);
switch(i) {
case 6:
case 0:
rgb[0] = hsv[2];
rgb[1] = n;
rgb[2] = m;
break;
case 1:
rgb[0] = n;
rgb[1] = hsv[2];
rgb[2] = m;
break;
case 2:
rgb[0] = m;
rgb[1] = hsv[2];
rgb[2] = n;
break;
case 3:
rgb[0] = m;
rgb[1] = n;
rgb[2] = hsv[2];
break;
case 4:
rgb[0] = n;
rgb[1] = m;
rgb[2] = hsv[2];
break;
case 5:
rgb[0] = hsv[2];
rgb[1] = m;
rgb[2] = n;
break;
}
}
// From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YUV#Mathematical_derivations_and_formulas
public static void yuv2rgb(float y, float u, float v, float[] rgb) {
rgb[0] = 1 * y + 0 * u + 1.13983f * v;
rgb[1] = 1 * y + -.39465f * u + -.58060f * v;
rgb[2] = 1 * y + 2.03211f * u + 0 * v;
}
public static void rgb2yuv(float r, float g, float b, float[] yuv) {
yuv[0] = .299f * r + .587f * g + .114f * b;
yuv[1] = -.14713f * r + -.28886f * g + .436f * b;
yuv[2] = .615f * r + -.51499f * g + -.10001f * b;
}
private static float[] randYUVinRGBRange(float minComponent, float maxComponent) {
while(true) {
float y = rand.nextFloat(); // * YFRAC + 1-YFRAC);
float u = rand.nextFloat() * 2 * U_OFF - U_OFF;
float v = rand.nextFloat() * 2 * V_OFF - V_OFF;
float[] rgb = new float[3];
yuv2rgb(y, u, v, rgb);
float r = rgb[0], g = rgb[1], b = rgb[2];
if(0 <= r && r <= 1 &&
0 <= g && g <= 1 &&
0 <= b && b <= 1 &&
(r > minComponent || g > minComponent || b > minComponent) && // don't want all dark components
(r < maxComponent || g < maxComponent || b < maxComponent)) // don't want all light components
return new float[]{y, u, v};
}
}
private static float sqrdist(float[] a, float[] b) {
float sum = 0;
for(int i = 0; i < a.length; i++) {
float diff = a[i] - b[i];
sum += diff * diff;
}
return sum;
}
private static double worstFit(Color[] colors) {
float worst = 8888;
float[] a = new float[3], b = new float[3];
for(int i = 1; i < colors.length; i++) {
colors[i].getColorComponents(a);
for(int j = 0; j < i; j++) {
colors[j].getColorComponents(b);
float dist = sqrdist(a, b);
if(dist < worst) {
worst = dist;
}
}
}
return Math.sqrt(worst);
}
private static float[] randYUVBetterThan(float bestDistSqrd, float minComponent, float maxComponent, float[][] in) {
for(int attempt = 1; attempt < 100 * in.length; attempt++) {
float[] candidate = randYUVinRGBRange(minComponent, maxComponent);
boolean good = true;
for(int i = 0; i < in.length; i++)
if(sqrdist(candidate, in[i]) < bestDistSqrd)
good = false;
if(good)
return candidate;
}
return null; // after a bunch of passes, couldn't find a candidate that beat the best.
}
/**
* Simple example program.
*/
public static void main(String[] args) {
final int ncolors = 10;
Color[] colors = generateVisuallyDistinctColors(ncolors, .8f, .3f);
for(int i = 0; i < colors.length; i++) {
System.out.println(colors[i].toString());
}
System.out.println("Worst fit color = " + worstFit(colors));
}
}
HSL color model may be well suited for "sorting" colors, but if you are looking for visually distinct colors you definitively need Lab color model instead.
CIELAB was designed to be perceptually uniform with respect to human color vision, meaning that the same amount of numerical change in these values corresponds to about the same amount of visually perceived change.
Once you know that, finding the optimal subset of N colors from a wide range of colors is still a (NP) hard problem, kind of similar to the Travelling salesman problem and all the solutions using k-mean algorithms or something won't really help.
That said, if N is not too big and if you start with a limited set of colors, you will easily find a very good subset of distincts colors according to a Lab distance with a simple random function.
I've coded such a tool for my own usage (you can find it here: https://mokole.com/palette.html), here is what I got for N=7:
It's all javascript so feel free to take a look on the source of the page and adapt it for your own needs.
A lot of very nice answers up there, but it might be useful to mention the python package distinctify in case someone is looking for a quick python solution. It is a lightweight package available from pypi that is very straightforward to use:
from distinctipy import distinctipy
colors = distinctipy.get_colors(12)
print(colors)
# display the colours
distinctipy.color_swatch(colors)
It returns a list of rgb tuples
[(0, 1, 0), (1, 0, 1), (0, 0.5, 1), (1, 0.5, 0), (0.5, 0.75, 0.5), (0.4552518132842178, 0.12660764790179446, 0.5467915225460569), (1, 0, 0), (0.12076092516775849, 0.9942188027771208, 0.9239958090462229), (0.254747094970068, 0.4768020779917903, 0.02444859177890535), (0.7854526395841417, 0.48630704929211144, 0.9902480906347156), (0, 0, 1), (1, 1, 0)]
Also it has some additional nice functionalities such as generating colors that are distinct from an existing list of colors.
Here's a solution to managed your "distinct" issue, which is entirely overblown:
Create a unit sphere and drop points on it with repelling charges. Run a particle system until they no longer move (or the delta is "small enough"). At this point, each of the points are as far away from each other as possible. Convert (x, y, z) to rgb.
I mention it because for certain classes of problems, this type of solution can work better than brute force.
I originally saw this approach here for tesselating a sphere.
Again, the most obvious solutions of traversing HSL space or RGB space will probably work just fine.
We just need a range of RGB triplet pairs with the maximum amount of distance between these triplets.
We can define a simple linear ramp, and then resize that ramp to get the desired number of colors.
In python:
from skimage.transform import resize
import numpy as np
def distinguishable_colors(n, shuffle = True,
sinusoidal = False,
oscillate_tone = False):
ramp = ([1, 0, 0],[1,1,0],[0,1,0],[0,0,1], [1,0,1]) if n>3 else ([1,0,0], [0,1,0],[0,0,1])
coltrio = np.vstack(ramp)
colmap = np.round(resize(coltrio, [n,3], preserve_range=True,
order = 1 if n>3 else 3
, mode = 'wrap'),3)
if sinusoidal: colmap = np.sin(colmap*np.pi/2)
colmap = [colmap[x,] for x in range(colmap.shape[0])]
if oscillate_tone:
oscillate = [0,1]*round(len(colmap)/2+.5)
oscillate = [np.array([osc,osc,osc]) for osc in oscillate]
colmap = [.8*colmap[x] + .2*oscillate[x] for x in range(len(colmap))]
#Whether to shuffle the output colors
if shuffle:
random.seed(1)
random.shuffle(colmap)
return colmap
I would try to fix saturation and lumination to maximum and focus on hue only. As I see it, H can go from 0 to 255 and then wraps around. Now if you wanted two contrasting colours you would take the opposite sides of this ring, i.e. 0 and 128. If you wanted 4 colours, you would take some separated by 1/4 of the 256 length of the circle, i.e. 0, 64,128,192. And of course, as others suggested when you need N colours, you could just separate them by 256/N.
What I would add to this idea is to use a reversed representation of a binary number to form this sequence. Look at this:
0 = 00000000 after reversal is 00000000 = 0
1 = 00000001 after reversal is 10000000 = 128
2 = 00000010 after reversal is 01000000 = 64
3 = 00000011 after reversal is 11000000 = 192
...
this way if you need N different colours you could just take first N numbers, reverse them, and you get as much distant points as possible (for N being power of two) while at the same time preserving that each prefix of the sequence differs a lot.
This was an important goal in my use case, as I had a chart where colors were sorted by area covered by this colour. I wanted the largest areas of the chart to have large contrast, and I was ok with some small areas to have colours similar to those from top 10, as it was obvious for the reader which one is which one by just observing the area.
This is trivial in MATLAB (there is an hsv command):
cmap = hsv(number_of_colors)
I have written a package for R called qualpalr that is designed specifically for this purpose. I recommend you look at the vignette to find out how it works, but I will try to summarize the main points.
qualpalr takes a specification of colors in the HSL color space (which was described previously in this thread), projects it to the DIN99d color space (which is perceptually uniform) and find the n that maximize the minimum distance between any oif them.
# Create a palette of 4 colors of hues from 0 to 360, saturations between
# 0.1 and 0.5, and lightness from 0.6 to 0.85
pal <- qualpal(n = 4, list(h = c(0, 360), s = c(0.1, 0.5), l = c(0.6, 0.85)))
# Look at the colors in hex format
pal$hex
#> [1] "#6F75CE" "#CC6B76" "#CAC16A" "#76D0D0"
# Create a palette using one of the predefined color subspaces
pal2 <- qualpal(n = 4, colorspace = "pretty")
# Distance matrix of the DIN99d color differences
pal2$de_DIN99d
#> #69A3CC #6ECC6E #CA6BC4
#> 6ECC6E 22
#> CA6BC4 21 30
#> CD976B 24 21 21
plot(pal2)
I think this simple recursive algorithm complementes the accepted answer, in order to generate distinct hue values. I made it for hsv, but can be used for other color spaces too.
It generates hues in cycles, as separate as possible to each other in each cycle.
/**
* 1st cycle: 0, 120, 240
* 2nd cycle (+60): 60, 180, 300
* 3th cycle (+30): 30, 150, 270, 90, 210, 330
* 4th cycle (+15): 15, 135, 255, 75, 195, 315, 45, 165, 285, 105, 225, 345
*/
public static float recursiveHue(int n) {
// if 3: alternates red, green, blue variations
float firstCycle = 3;
// First cycle
if (n < firstCycle) {
return n * 360f / firstCycle;
}
// Each cycle has as much values as all previous cycles summed (powers of 2)
else {
// floor of log base 2
int numCycles = (int)Math.floor(Math.log(n / firstCycle) / Math.log(2));
// divDown stores the larger power of 2 that is still lower than n
int divDown = (int)(firstCycle * Math.pow(2, numCycles));
// same hues than previous cycle, but summing an offset (half than previous cycle)
return recursiveHue(n % divDown) + 180f / divDown;
}
}
I was unable to find this kind of algorithm here. I hope it helps, it's my first post here.
Pretty neat with seaborn for Python users:
>>> import seaborn as sns
>>> sns.color_palette(n_colors=4)
it returns list of RGB tuples:
[(0.12156862745098039, 0.4666666666666667, 0.7058823529411765),
(1.0, 0.4980392156862745, 0.054901960784313725),
(0.17254901960784313, 0.6274509803921569, 0.17254901960784313),
(0.8392156862745098, 0.15294117647058825, 0.1568627450980392)]
Janus's answer but easier to read. I've also adjusted the colorscheme slightly and marked where you can modify for yourself
I've made this a snippet to be directly pasted into a jupyter notebook.
import colorsys
import itertools
from fractions import Fraction
from IPython.display import HTML as html_print
def infinite_hues():
yield Fraction(0)
for k in itertools.count():
i = 2**k # zenos_dichotomy
for j in range(1,i,2):
yield Fraction(j,i)
def hue_to_hsvs(h: Fraction):
# tweak values to adjust scheme
for s in [Fraction(6,10)]:
for v in [Fraction(6,10), Fraction(9,10)]:
yield (h, s, v)
def rgb_to_css(rgb) -> str:
uint8tuple = map(lambda y: int(y*255), rgb)
return "rgb({},{},{})".format(*uint8tuple)
def css_to_html(css):
return f"<text style=background-color:{css}> </text>"
def show_colors(n=33):
hues = infinite_hues()
hsvs = itertools.chain.from_iterable(hue_to_hsvs(hue) for hue in hues)
rgbs = (colorsys.hsv_to_rgb(*hsv) for hsv in hsvs)
csss = (rgb_to_css(rgb) for rgb in rgbs)
htmls = (css_to_html(css) for css in csss)
myhtmls = itertools.islice(htmls, n)
display(html_print("".join(myhtmls)))
show_colors()
If N is big enough, you're going to get some similar-looking colors. There's only so many of them in the world.
Why not just evenly distribute them through the spectrum, like so:
IEnumerable<Color> CreateUniqueColors(int nColors)
{
int subdivision = (int)Math.Floor(Math.Pow(nColors, 1/3d));
for(int r = 0; r < 255; r += subdivision)
for(int g = 0; g < 255; g += subdivision)
for(int b = 0; b < 255; b += subdivision)
yield return Color.FromArgb(r, g, b);
}
If you want to mix up the sequence so that similar colors aren't next to each other, you could maybe shuffle the resulting list.
Am I underthinking this?
This OpenCV function uses the HSV color model to generate n evenly distributed colors around the 0<=H<=360º with maximum S=1.0 and V=1.0. The function outputs the BGR colors in bgr_mat:
void distributed_colors (int n, cv::Mat_<cv::Vec3f> & bgr_mat) {
cv::Mat_<cv::Vec3f> hsv_mat(n,CV_32F,cv::Vec3f(0.0,1.0,1.0));
double step = 360.0/n;
double h= 0.0;
cv::Vec3f value;
for (int i=0;i<n;i++,h+=step) {
value = hsv_mat.at<cv::Vec3f>(i);
hsv_mat.at<cv::Vec3f>(i)[0] = h;
}
cv::cvtColor(hsv_mat, bgr_mat, CV_HSV2BGR);
bgr_mat *= 255;
}
This generates the same colors as Janus Troelsen's solution. But instead of generators, it is using start/stop semantics. It's also fully vectorized.
import numpy as np
import numpy.typing as npt
import matplotlib.colors
def distinct_colors(start: int=0, stop: int=20) -> npt.NDArray[np.float64]:
"""Returns an array of distinct RGB colors, from an infinite sequence of colors
"""
if stop <= start: # empty interval; return empty array
return np.array([], dtype=np.float64)
sat_values = [6/10] # other tones could be added
val_values = [8/10, 5/10] # other tones could be added
colors_per_hue_value = len(sat_values) * len(val_values)
# Get the start and stop indices within the hue value stream that are needed
# to achieve the requested range
hstart = start // colors_per_hue_value
hstop = (stop+colors_per_hue_value-1) // colors_per_hue_value
# Zero will cause a singularity in the caluculation, so we will add the zero
# afterwards
prepend_zero = hstart==0
# Sequence (if hstart=1): 1,2,...,hstop-1
i = np.arange(1 if prepend_zero else hstart, hstop)
# The following yields (if hstart is 1): 1/2, 1/4, 3/4, 1/8, 3/8, 5/8, 7/8,
# 1/16, 3/16, ...
hue_values = (2*i+1) / np.power(2,np.floor(np.log2(i*2))) - 1
if prepend_zero:
hue_values = np.concatenate(([0], hue_values))
# Make all combinations of h, s and v values, as if done by a nested loop
# in that order
hsv = np.array(np.meshgrid(hue_values, sat_values, val_values, indexing='ij')
).reshape((3,-1)).transpose()
# Select the requested range (only the necessary values were computed but we
# need to adjust the indices since start & stop are not necessarily multiples
# of colors_per_hue_value)
hsv = hsv[start % colors_per_hue_value :
start % colors_per_hue_value + stop - start]
# Use the matplotlib vectorized function to convert hsv to rgb
return matplotlib.colors.hsv_to_rgb(hsv)
Samples:
from matplotlib.colors import ListedColormap
ListedColormap(distinct_colors(stop=20))
ListedColormap(distinct_colors(start=30, stop=50))

Categories