We Keep Coding

Spring MongoDB Criteria: How to check that the List exists and contains object with specific value?

How to check that the List<Object> exists and contains an object of class whose partnerRole field value is equal to "CREATOR" and companyId field value is equals to "123"?
Document class:
#Document
public class ApplicationDocument {
List<PartnerDocument> partners = new ArrayList<>();
}
#Document
public class PartnerDocument {
private PartnerRole partnerRole;
private String companyId;
...
public enum PartnerRole {
UNKNOWN_ROLE,
CREATOR,
PARTICIPANT
}
}
My method for generating a List of Criteria. But that won't work because I'm referring to partners as if it were a PartnerDocument object, but partners is actually a List<PartnerDocument>.
public List<Criteria> getCriteria(Partner.PartnerRole role, String companyId) {
List<Criteria> criteriaList = new ArrayList<>();
criteriaList.add(Criteria.where("partners").exists(true));
criteriaList.add(
Criteria.where("partners.partnerRole").in(role)
);
criteriaList.add(
Criteria.where("partners.partnerRole").in(companyId)
);
return criteriaList;
}

There is a mistake in your second criteria.
Criteria.where("partners.partnerRole").in(companyId)
You are checking companyId against partnerRole.
It should be
Criteria.where("partners.companyId").in(companyId)

Map Custom JdbcTemplate query result in an Object

I new in java and try to use spring framework. I have a question.
By example, I have table :
employee (id_employee, name)
employee_product (id_employee_product, id_employee, product_name)
if I select an employee data from my Employee table, I can map it in a POJO model User and define the tables structure in that model, like this:
public class Employee {
private final int id_employee;
private final String nama;
public Employee(int id_employee, String nama){
this.id_employee = id_employee;
this.nama = nama;
}
public int getId() {
return id_employee;
}
public String getNama() {
return nama;
}
}
And this is the map from jdbcTemplate:
final String sql = "SELECT id_employee, nama FROM employee";
return jdbcTemplate.query(sql, (resultSet, i) -> {
return new Employee(
resultSet.getInt("id_employee"),
resultSet.getString("nama")
);
});
That is clear example for select data from 1 table.
My question is, how to map data from query if my data is custom query? Such us using join and select custom field from that tables, Am I need to create POJO every query?
Sometimes I need to select only employee.id_employee, and employee.name field from my employee table.
And in another controller I need to select employee.id_employee from my employee table.
In another case, I need only select employee.name, and employee_product.product_name
Is there an alternative to map the data without creating POJO for every case?

Create a one POJO combining two tables like this
public class Employee {
private int id_employee;
private String name;
private int id_employee_product.
private String product_name
//getter and setters
//Don't create a constructor its Entiry
}
Now by using a BeanPropertyRowMapper Doc Link write your repository like
public List<Employee> fetchEmployeeProduct(){
JdbcTemplate jdbcTemplate = new JdbcTemplate("Your_DataSource");
StringBuilder query = new StringBuilder();
query.append("Your Query");
List<Employee> employeeProductList =
jdbcTemplate.query(query.toString(), new BeanPropertyRowMapper<Employee>(Employee.class));
}
Make sure SELECT clause in the query and Employee POJO's filed name is same.
Once if you execute your query it will automatically map to POJO. You no need to write a custom mapper BeanPropertyRowMapperwill take care of mapping.

ObjectBox: Get objects with specific relations

Expect the two entities Movie and Genre:
#Entity
public class Movie {
#Id
private long id;
private String name;
private ToMany<Genre> genres;
[...]
}
#Entity
public class Genre {
#Id
private long id;
private String name;
[...]
}
We all know how to create a relation and save it:
Movie movie = new Movie();
movie.setTitle("Star Wars");
movie.getGenres().add(new Genre("Sci-Fi");
box.put(movie);
but is there a possibility to query all Movie-objects with a specific Genre? Like
Box<Movie> box = boxStore.boxFor(Movie.class);
Query query = box.query()
.equal(Genre_.name, "Sci-Fi") // note that I want to query the Movie-Box with Genre-properties
.build();
List movies = query.find();
My goal is to find all movies with a specific genre in a simple way. Does anyone know how to do it or do I have to query all movies and filter the result on my own? Or do I have to adapt my entities in another way?
Update:
I prepared the correct marked answer below to a working example:
final Genre genreSciFi = genreBox.query().equal(Genre_.name, "Sci-Fi").build().findFirst();
List<Movie> filteredMovies = movieBox.query().filter(new QueryFilter<Movie>() {
#Override
public boolean keep(#NonNull Movie entity) {
return entity.getGenres().contains(genreSciFi);
}
}).build().find();
To make the contains-Method work correctly, override equals-Method in your Genre-Entity:
#Override
public boolean equals(Object obj) {
return obj instanceof Genre && ((Genre) obj).getId() == id && ((Genre) obj).getName().equals(name);
}

Unfortunately, this part of the API is not exposed in Java yet. We want to refactor the Query API very soon.
Until this is ready, you can workaround using query filtering. Example using Java/Kotlin-ish code for brevity:
Query query = movieBox.query().filter(movie -> {
return genres.contains(genre -> {
return "Sci-Fi".equals(genre.getName())
}
}).build()
(Will make it similar in Java with the next update.)

How to use Java 8 Streams groupingBy to map multiple database records to a single object with a List<String> property for one column

My problem essentially comes down to this simplified example. I have data coming back from a DB which has some duplicate information in the rows.
In this example I have a list of TeamRow objects that come back from the DB. I can easily group these using Collectors.groupingBy:
public class TeamRow {
private int id;
private String name;
private String player;
public TeamRow(int id, String name, String player) {
this.id = id;
this.name = name;
this.player = player;
}
public int getId() {return id;}
public String getName() { return name; }
public String getPlayer() {return player;}
}
public class Team {
private int id;
private String name;
private List<String> players;
public Team(int id, String name, List<String> players) {
this.id = id;
this.name = name;
this.players = new ArrayList<String>(players);
}
}
List<TeamRow> dbTeams = new ArrayList<TeamRow>();
dbTeams.add(new TeamRow(1, "Team1", "Jonny"));
dbTeams.add(new TeamRow(1, "Team1", "Rob"));
dbTeams.add(new TeamRow(1, "Team1", "Carlos"));
dbTeams.add(new TeamRow(2, "Team2", "Shane"));
dbTeams.add(new TeamRow(2, "Team2", "Lucas"));
dbTeams.add(new TeamRow(3, "Team3", "Geraint"));
dbTeams.add(new TeamRow(3, "Team3", "Rocky"));
dbTeams.add(new TeamRow(3, "Team3", "Wayne"));
dbTeams.add(new TeamRow(3, "Team3", "Dwayne"));
dbTeams.add(new TeamRow(3, "Team3", "Lester"));
Map<Integer, List<TeamRow>> myMap = dbTeams.stream().collect(Collectors.groupingBy(TeamRow::getId));
However, what I'm actually trying to achieve is to convert the TeamRows to Teams. So that the id and name are only represented once and the players are stored in a List in the Team object. I can achieve this by adding a forEach over the map as shown below.
But I've been trying to figure out if there is a way I can achieve the same result by adding some sort of mapper or downstream collector. Would this even offer any benefit over adding a subsequent forEach ?? Eg:
List<Team> teams = dbTeams.stream().collect(Collectors.groupingBy(TeamRow::getId, ???), ???).???;
Conversion using forEach:
List<Team> teams = new ArrayList<>();
myMap.forEach((id, teamRows) -> {
if (teamRows.size() > 0) {
TeamRow tr = teamRows.get(0);
List<String> players = teamRows.stream().map(TeamRow::getPlayer).collect(Collectors.toList());
teams.add(new Team(id, tr.getName(), players));
}
});

Previously I said I would do it by creating an atomic transformer function like this:
Function<TeamRow, Team> getTeamRowTransformer() {
final Map<Integer, Team> map = new ConcurrentHashMap<Integer, Team>();
return (teamRow)->{
Team result = map.computeIfAbsent(teamRow.getId(), id->new Team(id, teamRow.getName(), Collections.emptyList()));
result.players.add(teamRow.getPlayer());
return result;
};
}
It handles the mapping and your stream code becomes one very legible step:
Set<Team> finalTeams = dbTeams.stream()
.map(getTeamRowTransformer())
.collect(Collectors.toSet());
HOWEVER, I realized, you can also do this:
List<Team> teams = dbTeams.stream()
.map(tr->new Team(tr.getId(), tr.getName(), Arrays.asList(tr.getPlayer())))
.collect(Collectors.collectingAndThen(
Collectors.groupingBy(t->t.id,
Collectors.reducing((Team a, Team b)->{
a.players.addAll(b.players);
return (Team)a;
})
), m->m.values().stream()
.filter(Optional::isPresent)
.map(Optional::get)
.collect(Collectors.toList())
)
);
This way you never have an accessible mutable collection until List<Team> teams is assigned.

You may use toMap collector with custom merge function. It's probably a good idea to add merge method to the Team class:
public class Team {
private final int id;
private final String name;
private final List<String> players;
public Team(int id, String name, List<String> players) {
this.id = id;
this.name = name;
this.players = new ArrayList<>(players);
}
// merges other team into this team, returning this team
public Team merge(Team other) {
assert id == other.id; // remove asserts if you don't like them
assert name.equals(other.name);
players.addAll(other.players);
return this;
}
}
Now you can solve your problem this way:
Collection<Team> teams = dbTeams.stream()
.map(tr -> new Team(tr.id, tr.name, Arrays.asList(tr.player)))
.collect(Collectors.toMap(t -> t.id, t -> t, Team::merge)).values();

You could try something like
List<Team> teamList = dbTeams.stream().collect(Collectors.collectingAndThen(Collectors.groupingBy(TeamRow::getId),
(m -> m.entrySet().stream().map(
e -> {
List<TeamRow> l = e.getValue();
return new Team(l.get(0).getId(), l.get(0).getName(), l.stream().map(TeamRow::getPlayer).collect(Collectors.toList()));
}
).collect(Collectors.toList()))));
Using collectingAndThen() you can use a function which maps the entries of the map to Teams. l.get(0) should not fail as there is always at least one entry in the list.
I am not sure if this is more concise, but at least it does not use foreach.

ParameterizedRowMapper That Maps Object List to Object

I am trying to set the Parent List in a ParameterizedRowMapper how is this written or approached. I have two Objects one for parent and one for children however children contains a ListThe parents for each child are stored in a separate table in the database and the mapping is 1 - many.
The select for the records for the parents will be done in a separate ResultSet. Will the mapping have to be done separately (separate ParameterizedRowMapper), if so how will i have to write the ParameterizedRowMapper this is the major concern how ParameterizedRowMapper is written to accommodate a list items.
ParameterizedRowMapper
public static class ChildrenMapper implements ParameterizedRowMapper<Children>{
public Children mapRow(ResultSet rs, int rowNum) throws SQLException {
Children child = new Children();
child.setFirstName(rs.getString("firstName"));
child.setLastName(rs.getString("lastName"));
//a child can have many Parents or gaurdians
child.setParent(List<Parent>);
return child;
}
}
Based on my research i have found that i need to use ResultSetExtractor, however i have a questions on the use of that. Do i integrate it into the class at the point of setting the Parent? Can someone guide me on how it can be done the correct way
Children.java
Public class Children(){
int cid;
String firstName;
String lastName;
List<Parent>parents;
..
//getters/setters
}
Parent.java
Public class Parent(){
int pid;
String firstName;
String lastName;
..
//setters/getters
}

I will show how to do this for a canonical 1-to-many example, you can adapt it to your vo class / table.
Order class
public class Order {
private Long orderId;
private String user;
private List<LineItem> items;
// Getter / setter omitted
}
Item class
public class LineItem {
private Long lineItemId;
private String product;
private int quantity;
// Getter / setter omitted
}
Use two rowmappers one for each class and then use a result set extractor to convert multiple rows into one order + line items
OrderRepository
public final static RowMapper<Order> orderMapper = ParameterizedBeanPropertyRowMapper.newInstance(Order.class);
public final static RowMapper<LineItem> lineItemMapper = ParameterizedBeanPropertyRowMapper.newInstance(LineItem.class);
public Order findOrderWithItems(Long orderId) {
return jdbcTemplate.query("select * from orders, line_item "
+ " where orders.order_id = line_item.order_id and orders.order_id = ?",
new ResultSetExtractor<Order>() {
public Order extractData(ResultSet rs) throws SQLException, DataAccessException {
Order order = null;
int row = 0;
while (rs.next()) {
if (order == null) {
order = orderMapper.mapRow(rs, row);
}
order.addItem(lineItemMapper.mapRow(rs, row));
row++;
}
return order;
}
}, orderId);
}
public List<Order> findAllOrderWithItmes() {
return jdbcTemplate.query("select * from orders, line_item "
+ " where orders.order_id = line_item.order_id order by orders.order_id",
new ResultSetExtractor<List<Order>>() {
public List<Order> extractData(ResultSet rs) throws SQLException, DataAccessException {
List<Order> orders = new ArrayList<Order>();
Long orderId = null;
Order currentOrder = null;
int orderIdx = 0;
int itemIdx = 0;
while (rs.next()) {
// first row or when order changes
if (currentOrder == null || !orderId.equals(rs.getLong("order_id"))) {
orderId = rs.getLong("order_id");
currentOrder = orderMapper.mapRow(rs, orderIdx++);
itemIdx = 0;
orders.add(currentOrder);
}
currentOrder.addItem(lineItemMapper.mapRow(rs, itemIdx++));
}
return orders;
}
});
}