I'm trying to run some elliptic curve results in java, but the modulo operator doesn't seem to output the right results.
int a = 17;
double previousx = 4;
double previousy = 14;
double xnew;
double ynew;
double sigma;
double convert;
for (int i = 1; i < 10; i++) {
convert = 0;
for (int j = 0; i<60; j++) {
if (((2 * previousy * j) % 59) == 1) {
convert = j;
break;
}
}
sigma = ((3 * Math.pow(previousx, 2) + a) * convert) % 59;
xnew = ((sigma * sigma) - (2 * previousx)) % 59;
ynew = (sigma * (previousx - xnew) - previousy) % 59;
System.out.println((Math.pow(2, i)) + "x P: " + xnew + "," + ynew + " Sigma:" + sigma);
previousx = xnew;
previousy = ynew;
}
output of the first iteration:
2.0x P: 8.0,-57.0 Sigma:55.0
8 and 55 are correct, but -57 mod 59 = 2 and not -57. How do I fix this?
8 and 55 are correct, but -57 mod 59 = 2 and not -57. How do I fix this?
The % operator in Java isn't modulus - it's the remainder operator. It's behaving entirely correctly according to the language specification. When you suspect that Java is misbehaving, it's always worth checking the specification to see whether it's actually your expectations which are incorrect.
If you want a modulus operator, you just need to check whether the result is negative, and if so add the divisor again:
int remainder = (2 * previousy * j) % 59;
int modulus = remainder < 0 ? remainder + 59 : remainder;
if (modulus == 1) {
...
}
Alternatively, in your case:
int remainder = (2 * previousy * j) % 59;
if (remainder == 1 || remainder == -58) {
...
}
... and adjust the rest of your uses of % as appropriate too, of course.
Additionally, as Stijn de Witt mentioned, it looks like you've got a typo in your inner loop condition.
It looks to me like you have a typo in the inner loop:
for (int j = 0 ; i<60 ; j++)
It says i<60 in a loop that is iterating over j...
I'd try fixing that.
As to the original question... Can you reduce your test case? If you maintain that modulo is not working correctly for some numbers then why not make a single statement that does a modulo on those numbers and prints the results?
Related
I have to wright a function for Newtons approximation of Pi.
Newton calculated that Pi/(2* sqrt(2)) = 1+ 1/3 - 1/5 - 1/7 + 1/9 + 1/11 -...
public class newtonPi {
public static void main(String []args) {
int n = 10;
double piN = 0;
int sign = -1;
for(int i = 1; i < n; i+=2) {
System.out.println("i:"+i+" sign:"+sign);
piN += sign*(1.0/i);
sign *= -1;
}
System.out.println(piN*(2*Math.sqrt(2)));
}}
But with this approach, the sign changes everytime and not every other.
Thanks for the help :)
The pattern repeats every 8. Use the remainder operator % (aka modulo):
sign = n % 8 > 4 ? -1 : 1;
If I understood your question, you want to change the sign every two iterations, right? The problem is you're doing sign *= -1 on each iteration.
Try to use another variable in order to figure out if the sign must be inverted in the current iteration. Here is your code updated:
int sign = 1; // Start with positive
for(int i = 1,iteration = 0; i < n; i += 2,iteration++) {
System.out.println("i:" + i + " sign:" + sign);
piN += sign * (1.0 / i);
if(iteration % 2 != 0){
sign *= -1; // Change every 2 iterations, the odd ones
}
}
You must deliver exactly N kilograms of sugar to a candy store. The sugar made in the sugar factory is contained in a bag. The bag has 3 kg bag and 5 kg bag.
I try to carry as little bags as possible. For example, when you need to deliver 18 kilograms of sugar, you can take 6 bags of 3 kilograms, but if you deliver 3 kilograms and 3 kilograms, you can deliver a smaller number of bags.
Write a program to find out the number of bags you should take when you have to deliver exactly N kilograms of sugar.
(3<=N<=5000 AND If you can not make exactly N kilograms, print -1.)
In case of only 4 or 7 , it is not divided so I made it to print -1.
And to get the minimum bag, I used the code below.
But when I run this, the case if it is not divided by 5 or 3, the bottom sentence should be printed out but it is not working.
I want to know how does it works. Thank you.
import java.util.Scanner;
public class Main {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Scanner input = new Scanner(System.in);
int N = input.nextInt();
if (N % 5 == 0) {
System.out.println(N / 5);
} else if (N == 4 || N == 7) {
System.out.println(-1);
} else
for (int i = 1; (N - 3 * i) % 5 != 0; i++) {
if ((N - 3 * i) % 5 == 0)
System.out.println(i + (N - 3 * i) / 5);
break;
}
}
}
Looks there is a logic issue with your solution. Try the following :
boolean isPossible = true;
if (N % 5 == 0) {
System.out.println("You need : " + (N / 5) + " bags");
} else {
int diff = 0;
for (int i = N; i > 0 && N >= 0; i--) {
if (N % 5 != 0) {
diff = N % 5;
N = N - diff;
} else {
if (diff % 3 == 0) {
System.out.println("You need : " + (N / 5 + diff / 3) + " bags");
isPossible = true;
break;
} else {
N = N - 5;
diff = diff + 5;
}
}
}
}
if (N <= 0 || !isPossible)
System.out.println(-1);
Logic is explained below :
Basically here we find the modulus of N with 5 and check if the
remainder (in the example diff) is a multiple of 3.
If the remainder (diff) is not a multiple of 3 then we reduce N by
5 and increase diff by 5. This continues until we have found a match (isPossible) or else if not found -1 is printed out.
So as far as I understand, you're trying to use the smallest amount of 3kg bags in the last for loop and you want to break out as soon as the remainder is divisible by 5kgs.
(int i = 1; (N - 3 * i) % 5 != 0; i++)
Could you not have the middle part as i < 5?
(int i = 1; i < 5; i++)
Also, you could get rid of the if condition
if (N % 5 == 0) {
part by starting i at 0, so you account for the case N is divisible by 5:
(int i = 0; i < 5; i++)
Scanner input = new Scanner(System.in);
int N = input.nextInt();
int sum = 0;
boolean isFound = false;
for (int i = 0; i < N / 2; i++) {
for (int j = 0; j < N / 2; j++) {
if ((5 * i) + (3 * j) == N) {
sum = i + j;
isFound = true;
}
}
}
if (isFound ) {
System.out.println("You require " + sum + " bags");
} else {
System.out.println(-1);
}
Explanation:
The above code aims to find the possible combinations of the sum of the factors of 3 and 5 that give the number, i.e N:
For example:
N = 32
For each iteration, the following condition is checked.
if((5 * i) + (3 * j) == N)
The check continues until the smallest numbers that satisfy the condition are found.
5*0 + 3*0 = 0 which is not equal to 32
5*0 + 3*1 = 3 which is not equal to 32
5*0 + 3*2 = 6 which is not equal to 32
.
.
5*1 + 3*0 = 5 which is not equal to 32
5*1 + 3*1 = 8 which is not equal to 32
5*1 + 3*2 = 11 which is not equal to 32
5*1 + 3*4 = 17 which is not equal to 32
.
.
5*4 + 3*0 = 20 which is not equal to 32
5*4 + 3*1 = 23 which is not equal to 32
5*4 + 3*2 = 26 which is not equal to 32
5*4 + 3*3 = 29 which is not equal to 32
5*4 + 3*4 = 32
In this case, i=4 and j=4, i.e sum of bags required (i+j) = 8
isFound is set to true to indicate that the combination is found.
If no combination is found, isFound remains to be false, and -1 is printed.
I am working in java and came across an odd block of code that my fellow college wrote i'm sure the modulus operator would work but for some reason i'm not getting the expected results i thought i would from the operator.
right now the code is written as follows:
long divisionID = myMaxId % 40;
if (divisionID == 0) {
divisionID = 1;
}
long empiresubID = 1;
if (myMaxId >= 1600) {
empiresubID = 2;
}
if (myMaxId >= (1600 * 2)) {
empiresubID = 3;
}
if (myMaxId >= (1600 * 3)) {
empiresubID = 4;
}
if (myMaxId >= (1600 * 4)) {
empiresubID = 5;
}
if (myMaxId >= (1600 * 5)) {
empiresubID = 6;
}
it's like this for a few other places and this goes up through 1600*40.
i thought using the modulus operator for myMaxId %1600 but that gave me way incorrect results.
the end goal is there are 40 divisions, we first fill sub division 1 for all divisions first using myMaxID % 40 as users register.
then once that is done the subdivision would then flip to 2, then we fill in all the divisions subdivision 2.
i don't think the way it's currently programmed is efficient and there should be some other way to do this.
any thoughts or help on this would be great.
I think you can get rid of the chain of ifs by replacing with
long empiresubID = (myMaxId / 1600) + 1;
Your method can be replaced by two lines:
long divisionID = myMaxId % 40 == 0 ? 1 : myMaxId % 40;
long empiresubID = (myMaxId / 1600) + 1;
Why not just divide myMaxId by 1600 (using integer division)?
Then you can directly set empiresubID to the result plus one...
It always amazes me to see how much code like this exists in production!
Im trying to check if a string (important that it is a string) that im reading is correct accoring to the rules of ISBN-13. I found a formula
For example, the ISBN-13 check digit of 978-0-306-40615-?
is calculated as follows:
s = 9×1 + 7×3 + 8×1 + 0×3 + 3×1 + 0×3 + 6×1 + 4×3 + 0×1 + 6×3 + 1×1 + 5×3
= 9 + 21 + 8 + 0 + 3 + 0 + 6 + 12 + 0 + 18 + 1 + 15
= 93
93 / 10 = 9 remainder 3
10 – 3 = 7`
My problem is i don't know how to multiply one number with 1 and every other with 3 ? Im guessing a for-loop but i don't know how to start.
You could "simply" use regular expressions:
ISBN(-1(?:(0)|3))?:?\x20+(?(1)(?(2)(?:(?=.{13}$)\d{1,5}([ -])\d{1,7}\3\d{1,6}\3(?:\d|x)$)|(?:(?=.{17}$)97(?:8|9)([ -])\d{1,5}\4\d{1,7}\4\d{1,6}\4\d$))|(?(.{13}$)(?:\d{1,5}([ -])\d{1,7}\5\d{1,6}\5(?:\d|x)$)|(?:(?=.{17}$)97(?:8|9)([ -])\d{1,5}\6\d{1,7}\6\d{1,6}\6\d$)))
You have 6 pairs of (even,odd) numbers, so go through them pairwise.
for (i = 0; i < 6; i++) {
even += array[2*i];
odd += array[2*i+1]*3;
}
checkbit = 10 - (even+odd)%10;
assuming your inputString is ascii:
int odd = 0;
int even = 0;
char[] c = (inputString + "00").replaceAll("[\\-]", "").toCharArray();
for (int i = 0; i < (c.length - 1) / 2; ++i) {
odd += c[2 * i] - 48;
even += c[2 * i + 1] - 48;
}
int result = 10 - (odd + 3 * even) % 10;
This seems to work effectively and is clear.
// Calculates the isbn13 check digit for the 1st 12 digits in the string.
private char isbn13CheckDigit(String str) {
// Sum of the 12 digits.
int sum = 0;
// Digits counted.
int digits = 0;
// Start multiplier at 1. Alternates between 1 and 3.
int multiplier = 1;
// Treat just the 1st 12 digits of the string.
for (int i = 0; i < str.length() && digits < 12; i++) {
// Pull out that character.
char c = str.charAt(i);
// Is it a digit?
if ('0' <= c && c <= '9') {
// Keep the sum.
sum += multiplier * (c - '0');
// Flip multiplier between 1 and 3 by flipping the 2^1 bit.
multiplier ^= 2;
// Count the digits.
digits += 1;
}
}
// What is the check digit?
int checkDigit = (10 - (sum % 10)) % 10;
// Give it back to them in character form.
return (char) (checkDigit + '0');
}
NB: Edited to correctly handle the 0 check digit. See Wikipedia International Standard Book Number for example isbn with check digit of 0.
Paul
Similar, with loop and awful char-to-string-to-int conversions ;]
boolean isISBN13(String s){
String ss = s.replaceAll("[^\\d]", "");
if(ss.length()!=13)
return false;
int sum=0, multi=1;
for(int i=0; i<ss.length()-1; ++i){
sum += multi * Integer.parseInt(String.valueOf(ss.charAt(i)));
multi = (multi+2)%4; //1 or 3
}
return (Integer.parseInt(String.valueOf(ss.charAt(ss.length()))) == (10 - sum%10));
}
I know Math.sin() can work but I need to implement it myself using factorial(int) I have a factorial method already below are my sin method but I can't get the same result as Math.sin():
public static double factorial(double n) {
if (n <= 1) // base case
return 1;
else
return n * factorial(n - 1);
}
public static double sin(int n) {
double sum = 0.0;
for (int i = 1; i <= n; i++) {
if (i % 2 == 0) {
sum += Math.pow(1, i) / factorial(2 * i + 1);
} else {
sum += Math.pow(-1, i) / factorial(2 * i + 1);
}
}
return sum;
}
You should use the Taylor series. A great tutorial here
I can see that you've tried but your sin method is incorrect
public static sin(int n) {
// angle to radians
double rad = n*1./180.*Math.PI;
// the first element of the taylor series
double sum = rad;
// add them up until a certain precision (eg. 10)
for (int i = 1; i <= PRECISION; i++) {
if (i % 2 == 0)
sum += Math.pow(rad, 2*i+1) / factorial(2 * i + 1);
else
sum -= Math.pow(rad, 2*i+1) / factorial(2 * i + 1);
}
return sum;
}
A working example of calculating the sin function. Sorry I've jotted it down in C++, but hope you get the picture. It's not that different :)
Your formula is wrong and you are getting a rough result of sin(1) and all you're doing by changing n is changing the accuracy of this calculation. You should look the formula up in Wikipedia and there you'll see that your n is in the wrong place and shouldn't be used as the limit of the for loop but rather in the numerator of the fraction, in the Math.pow(...) method. Check out Taylor Series
It looks like you are trying to use the taylor series expansion for sin, but have not included the term for x. Therefore, your method will always attempt to approximate sin(1) regardless of argument.
The method parameter only controls accuracy. In a good implementation, a reasonable value for that parameter is auto-detected, preventing the caller from passing to low a value, which can result in highly inaccurate results for large x. Moreover, to assist fast convergence (and prevent unnecessary loss of significance) of the series, implementations usually use that sin(x + k * 2 * PI) = sin(x) to first move x into the range [-PI, PI].
Also, your method is not very efficient, due to the repeated evaluations of factorials. (To evaluate factorial(5) you compute factorial(3), which you have already computed in the previous iteration of the for-loop).
Finally, note that your factorial implementation accepts an argument of type double, but is only correct for integers, and your sin method should probably receive the angle as double.
Sin (x) can be represented as Taylor series:
Sin (x) = (x/1!) – (x3/3!) + (x5/5!) - (x7/7!) + …
So you can write your code like this:
public static double getSine(double x) {
double result = 0;
for (int i = 0, j = 1, k = 1; i < 100; i++, j = j + 2, k = k * -1) {
result = result + ((Math.pow(x, j) / factorial (j)) * k);
}
return result;
}
Here we have run our loop only 100 times. If you want to run more than that you need to change your base equation (otherwise infinity value will occur).
I have learned a very good trick from the book “How to solve it by computer” by R.G.Dromey. He explain it like this way:
(x3/3! ) = (x X x X x)/(3 X 2 X 1) = (x2/(3 X 2)) X (x1/1!) i = 3
(x5/5! ) = (x X x X x X x X x)/(5 X 4 X 3 X 2 X 1) = (x2/(5 X 4)) X (x3/3!) i = 5
(x7/7! ) = (x X x X x X x X x X x X x)/(7 X 6 X 5 X 4 X 3 X 2 X 1) = (x2/(7 X 6)) X (x5/5!) i = 7
So the terms (x2/(3 X 2)) , (x2/(5 X 4)), (x2/(7 X 6)) can be expressed as x2/(i X (i - 1)) for i = 3,5,7,…
Therefore to generate consecutive terms of the sine series we can write:
current ith term = (x2 / ( i X (i - 1)) ) X (previous term)
The code is following:
public static double getSine(double x) {
double result = 0;
double term = x;
result = x;
for (int i = 3, j = -1; i < 100000000; i = i + 2, j = j * -1) {
term = x * x * term / (i * (i - 1));
result = result + term * j;
}
return result;
}
Note that j variable used to alternate the sign of the term .