I am currently using Oracle ADF (which is an end-to-end Java EE framework) for building my web applications and GlassFish 3.1 as application server.
The latter supports JAAS (declarative inside its admin console). So, I have created a security realm and mapped them with the roles declared in a configuration file and use JAAS to implement the authorization and authentication security features.
Everything fine, until now! This past weeks I have been researching on Java EE security.
What I've found is that JAAS is good enough if you stick with "basic" security. Moreover, it seems that JAAS (as part of the Java Security Framework) was meant just for Java SE (but since Java EE is built on Java SE, some of it’s modules are being reused, such as LoginMethod and Callbacks).
Then, I've found many posts about JASPIC, finding out that it can be implemented only by a programmatic manner (not a problem) and it's not yet fully supported by app servers vendors, and tried to make a comparison between both. Even if JASPIC1.1 release had resolved some issues, like:
The container will however not fully remember the authentication. The
SAM is still called at each request, and the SAM still has to
re-authenticate
(it doesn't sound so good to me).
Then, I've passed on looking for integrating some security framework. The most famous ones seems to be "Spring" and "Shiro". Of course each one of them has it's own characteristics (may be the first is more suitable on a specific situation while the second in another). What's more important to me at the more are:
Authentication
Authorization
Session Management (and possibly, encryption)
But, everywhere I found contradictory conclusions. The result: I'm more confused now then before searching.
I am just a novice in topics like security, and moreover I am a developer (I have stuff to implement), so it's kinda hard to keep up to date with every new release and the progress on security seems to keep going on every day galloping.
I'd like some facts based on personal experience if possible. Every hint or suggestion is appreciated. I want to be sure I'm confident before taking the implementation step.
JASPIC is the one technology that being a part of Java EE integrates really well with it.
The fact that JASPIC authentication modules don't automatically remember a session is an advantage too as it makes them suitable for stateless applications too (think APIs such as JAX-RS). When you authenticate and do want sessions, then just put the result (username + groups) into the session. Then at the start of each "validateRequest" method do a quick check if there's anything in the session and if so give these to the container again. No need to authenticate from scratch and certainly no need to remember any password!
Shiro and Spring Security are very full featured frameworks. You can barely compare that to JASPIC which is very low level and basic. Both Spring and Shiro don't perfectly integrate with Java EE. Spring Security is often said to be more complex than Shiro.
Hope this helps
The Servlet profile of JASPIC requires that the configured (for the app) Server Authentication module(s) (SAM) be called on every request; exactly so that the SAM will be able to manage authentication sessions (should that be desired)
The profile also supports the case, where a SAM is configured to perform authentication, but then wishes to delegate authentication session management to the encompassing container, which is enabled by the used of the registerSession callback property.
Also as noted by Mike Braun, the profile also supports a stateless mode wrt to authentication sessions, and is fully integrated with the container authorization system; such that JASPIC authentication must occur when the target request is covered by an authorization constraint (such as would be defined in web.xml or by use of the ServletSecurity annotation).
The JASPIC defined Callbacks and the container provided Callback handler, allow a portable SAM to set the container caller principal, to consult the container's user registry for password validation and group assignment, etc.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed last year.
The community reviewed whether to reopen this question last year and left it closed:
Opinion-based Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Improve this question
Warning! I'm on a bit of a fishing trip here, and I'm not even sure if the questions that I'm asking entirely make sense. Please be kind with your responses! :)
I recently took over a project that is currently based on a Java + Linux + Tomcat + MySQL. Right now, the system is basically just a website with a few cron jobs in the back-ground to move some data around, etc. In working with the product manager to develop a prioritized backlog, it’s clear from what he wants to do that I need to start developing a service-oriented architecture (SOA <-- buzz word warning!), and I will end up with a blend of web servers and application servers. Note: I’m strongly considering moving to Glassfish v3.
Currently, authentication and authorizations are handled in Java code with user information being stored in the MySQL database. At the bare minimum, it seems to me that I will need to split this out into a separate authentication service (otherwise, will end up with a bunch of duplicate code all over the place to handle user authentication and authorizations).
I’ve been looking into single sign-on (SSO) type solutions and doing some research. From what I can gather, OpenSSO has been officially dropped by Oracle, but picked up by ForgeRock and now is called OpenAM. This appears to be very close to what I want, but since I already have a MySQL-based system, I would prefer to have something that supports it (or some other kind of RDBMS). I found this on Stack Overflow and it seems to indicate that it’s basically LDAP or nothing.
Is there a way to make OpenSSO/OpenAM talk to Database for its authentication and authorization?
My questions are:
What other options are out there to OpenSSO/OpenAM? Is LDAP the way to go? Note: doing a “OpenAM vs” google search doesn’t yield much. Do people tend to just “roll their own”?
Any thoughts/suggestions/links on this topic that will help educate me will be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance for your patience and help.
Are you integrating existing applications, or do you just want to support your own applications?
Are you looking for actual SSO or simply shared credentials? SSO is logging in to a single application, and having that credential propagate to another application (such as logging in to Gmail and being automatically logged in to Blogger). Shared credential is you can use the same login name and password across applications, but the credential itself is not automatically propagated.
LDAP is a common system used to manage a shared credential. Many systems allow you to point their authentication store to an existing LDAP server.
For example, if you had several apps deployed in a Java EE container, and also, say, an email server and web based email client, all of these diverse applications could be pointed to the same LDAP server and your users would have a single login and password for all of the different systems, all written in different languages, all deployed on different machines. This is a bread and butter use case of LDAP, and pretty much every system can handle this out of the box. Glassfish and Tomcat can both readily validate against an LDAP server. So can Apache (Web server), Postgres (Database), Postfix (email), etc. etc.
So if you want simply a shared credential, you get that "for free", right now, by installing an LDAP server. LDAP is a bit of a different beast than something like a DBMS, but once you study it a little and "get it", it's really quite nice. OpenLDAP is a popular LDAP server, but I'm partial to ApacheDS.
The way to set that up in a Java EE container is to set up a "Realm". GF and Tomcat both have LDAP realms out of the box, I imagine the rest do to. But the nut there is that you need to use Java EE security to leverage the Realm.
See, the detail with a Java EE Realm is that it's an aspect of the CONTAINER, not the application. Just like a connection pool is a container resource that your application leverages. Most people want security to be a part of their application, where they feel they have more control over it.
That's all well and good until you start getting a bunch of different applications and everyone is configured differently and has separate user lists, and password policies, etc. etc.
LDAP can fix a lot of that, since you configure them all to use the same credential store.
The Realm fills that need on a Java EE server. Your application is configured to use a Realm provided by the container. If you have several applications, and a single Realm, then they all get to share the credentials within that Realm (regardless of the Realm type).
Realms can be anything: file based, db based, LDAP, etc. Realms also cluster if the container clusters (which can be handy).
The dark side of Java EE security, and why most apps avoid it is that, since, again, the Realm is part of the container, and not the application, it can be a little ungainly to use, and perhaps not offer the features you like in terms of user management, password policies, etc.
But the bright side of Java EE security is that once you're under its umbrella, you can leverage the credential all over in your code easily. A person logs in to the web site, and that credential can be used there in the web app, or automatically propagated back to the EJB tier (ever a remote EJB tier), and the information is always handy.
You can point your web apps at a realm, you EJBs, your web services. They all leverage the same pieces.
In order to get kind of the best of both worlds is to leverage container specific mechanisms to access the containers security. This is the other dark side of Java EE security.
Things like Realms, and direct access to container security are not portable across containers. GF does it different than Tomcat does it different from WebLogic. It's all really close, but differs in details so your code won't port seamlessly.
The bright side is for in house apps, most folks simply leverage the container they have, put a reasonable abstraction around the container dependent code, and call it day noting that yes, they will have to port this if and when they move to a different container. But, in practice. much like a database, once a container platform is chosen, folks tend to snuggle in tight and stick with it.
Finally, Servlet 3.0 (In GF3 and Tomcat 7) standardizes more of the programmatic login issues to make them more portable across containers, but the underlying concepts are the same.
Now, SSO.
SSO is a different beast. But, out the gate, both GF and Tomcat support SSO for web apps. This lets you log in to one web app and have be able to easily access others without having to log in to them. But the SSO is a little bit limited since it relies more heavily on the container security and its lifecycle, rather than a more flexible one under the control of the application. Mind, not just on Realms (that's a given), but on the actual container based FORM login, rather than a custom programmatic login. FORM login is not spectacular, but it's functional and it works. Implement a Realm, deploy your apps to a single instance of Tomcat or GF (or a cluster in GF 3.1), and you get SSO for free, so if that's important, it's kind of nice really. It's usability is fine for back office apps, but not perhaps the public internet.
If you want a more sophisticated SSO solution, then you need look at custom implementations. OpenSSO is one of those, and it relies on SAML and the SAML web profile. However, there are others. There's CAS, Atlassian Cloud, Kerberos, and OAuth as well. Those are all using different protocols than SAML. If you want to stick with SAML you can also look at Shibboleth, or even SimpleSAML (SimpleSAML is a PHP server that acts as a SAML Identity Provider, among other things, but you still need a Service Provider within your applications).
Whatever protocol you choose, the process is basically the same (detailed here -- Cross Domain Login - How to login a user automatically when transferred from one domain to another).
But the devil is in the details. And, boy, are there devils.
All of these systems are complicated. SSO is complicated. For example, now that you have Single Sign On, what about Single Sign Out? What about Single Time Out? What about credential changes while users are logged in? What about an STS (Secure Token Service) for your Web Services? (STS offers a similar delegated authentication mechanism for web services.)
SAML introduces you to a whole lot of new vocabulary, and a lot of configuration. It's not readily picked up since the documentation isn't stellar and relies a lot on standards documents which talk to a higher level of generic things, and not to you and your application specifically.
If you don't need really need SSO, then you'll likely be content with something like a central LDAP store and going on from there.
All that said, as an example, our applications support both a DB and LDAP backend. They use Glassfish, and Java EE security. We completely control the user experience. We also support SSO via SAML (we wrote our own Identity and Service Providers), and we have both shared credentials via LDAP and SSO across Java and other applications, using our code and third party code. The bright side is this is all standards based. The dark side is that standards are communicated in english, and english is subject to interpretation.
I say this simply to say it can be done. I have also written ad hoc, back of the napkin SSO implementations, both same domain and cross domain (same domain is simple with a shared cookie) using simple Servlet Filters. Password policies, password recovery, keep alive timers, multiple window timeout and session management (that's a hoot), roles, privileges, etc. etc. Been there, done that.
Also, I would be remiss to not mention Spring and Spring Security which offers all of this on top of Spring. I have not used it (I'm not a Spring person), but those folks do know what they are doing so it's worth looking at.
Please note that "Is there a way to make OpenSSO/OpenAM talk to Database for its authentication and authorization?" is phrased wrong. The question details and answers only deal with the authorization aspect. OpenAM works great with a MySQL database of users and passwords (authentication), and can use it's hidden/embedded LDAP server for storing policies and other settings.
It sounds like you still need to flesh out your security model, but you will likely find you do not need something like OpenAM at all, and can just use container/framework provided security.
This list might provide a good starting point:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_single_sign-on_implementations
with JOSSO and Shibboleth springing to mind.
OpenAM has two separate stores, a User Store, where users and all the accompanying properties are stored and a Configuration Store, which holds the configuration. There is a database User Store, which is available in OpenAM however I have never tried it. The SO question you were pointing to was referring primarily to the config store, which while LDAP only, is embedded in OpenAM (so doesn't require direct management).
Personally I am a fan of Tomcat over Glassfish, as it is a fast and light Servlet container, without all the associated bloat which goes with a full J2EE container.
You can use OpenAm with RDBMs. I am using JBDC based user store in OpenAm
OpenAM seems to have the ability to plug in your own authentication module.
Presumably, you can make your DB calls from within your extentsion of the AMLoginModule.
I have successfully build a custom user repository for OpenAm. Since this question have not been active for a while and because it would be too long to describe in details here how to do it, I will just give a few hints. If you need help on specifics, fell free to ask me.
Your basic entry point needs to extends com.sun.identity.idm.IdRepo.
You need to register your custom repository using ssoadm.jsp?cmd=add-sub-schema.
From this point, your repository type will be listed among the other types when you create a data store for a realm.
Good luck !
Which one is the best approach/method to implement security in Java EE?(JPA/JSPs)
I'm working on a personal project so I can learn Java EE and I am a little confused on how to approach the AUTHORIZATION and AUTHENTICATION process on my website.
I have different roles and I don't want certain users to access certain parts of the website. So I've been searching for docs and tutorials and etc, but everything I find dates to more than 3-4 years ago. Is there anything more recent that I should look into?
Here are some of the things I found:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/developer-tools/jdev/oc4j-jaas-login-module-083975.html
Any help would be greatly appreciated!!! :)
Spring Security. Although it is branded as Spring, you might find it useful for web applications; do note that you don't need to write a Spring app to use Spring Security.
If you wish to stick to JAAS, I would suggest using one of the container's login modules, just to get started, before you attempt to write your own login module. Be forewarned that you might end up writing one, if the container supplied modules do not meet your requirements. And, there is a good book on JAAS to help you understand it in detail.
Moreover, take a look at Servlet spec 3.0, to see how annotations can be used declare the roles (#DeclareRoles, which came in servlet spec 2.5) in the servlet itself, before defining what roles have access to what HTTP method (using #RolesAllowed). You can also employ annotations like #DenyAll and #PermitAll, to permit or forbid access to all users. #TransportProtected will ensure that the HTTP method is accessed over HTTPS. All one needs to do, is to map these roles in the source code, to actual roles in the JAAS realm; this often done using a container specific descriptor file.
ADDENDUM
Since you are using JSPs and not Facelets or any other technology for the presentation tier, you might be interested in the JSP tags offered by Spring Security. It is much cleaner that maintaining all of the authorization metadata in a humongous web.xml file.
As far as JPAs are concerned, well, the underlying access to them is usually enforced at the servlets or EJBs. Of course, you can build in more programmatic security, based on your needs - using entity listeners would help in this process as you would be able to intercept load, update and persist operations (if you are that particular, but for the most part building security before your business logic is executed usually is sufficient).
And oh, take a look at JBoss Seam (and Seam security), for it is a complete application development framework built on Java EE.
Something more recent than JAAS is the Spring Security framework. It supports JSR-350 (EJB 3) and thus would work fine in Java EE.
I worked on a Java EE application recently with JAAS. It's pretty current, you can check it's home page at Oracle.
It works with roles, authentication, etc.
You can use it in JBoss and Glassfish, probably the rest of the ASs too.
Spring security tutorial https://www.packtpub.com/spring-security-3/book. Highly recommended.