Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
Questions asking us to recommend or find a tool, library or favorite off-site resource are off-topic for Stack Overflow as they tend to attract opinionated answers and spam. Instead, describe the problem and what has been done so far to solve it.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm looking for a SPARQL parser and i find Apache Jena/arq and Redland librdf.
But Jena has been written in Java,so is there a way that I use Jena's APIs in C/C++, (maybe with SWIG,...)?
Depending on what functionality you need, it may be plausible to interact with an Apache Fuseki server via the SPARQL 1.1 Protocol. Fuseki is Jena, just wrapped in a Jetty service in order to implement the protocol.
If this is far heavier than what you are looking for, and you desire interacting with Jena from C/C++, then JNI (or better yet, some automated wrapper like SWIG) may be your best bet.
Related
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
Questions asking us to recommend or find a tool, library or favorite off-site resource are off-topic for Stack Overflow as they tend to attract opinionated answers and spam. Instead, describe the problem and what has been done so far to solve it.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
The project aims to analyzing the patients’ illness cells using Big Data technology to indicate which treatments could have the best outcomes and fewest side effects.
But I think using python or java library. I can't decide which language's library is more useful for my project. if you have any experience , could you help me. I do not know about anything about big data.
Check out Anaconda. It's got just about every library you'll need for big data analysis bundled into one installer.
The Anaconda distro also includes Disco MapReduce, so you have all the tools you need to set up a distributed file system MapReduce farm for really large analysis jobs.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
Questions asking us to recommend or find a tool, library or favorite off-site resource are off-topic for Stack Overflow as they tend to attract opinionated answers and spam. Instead, describe the problem and what has been done so far to solve it.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
Does anyone knows if there is a good service oriented framework (like Apache Thrift) that supports both C++, java and python with a similar set of features but with lighter requirement?
My main issue with thrift is that it requires boost (on the C++ side) that is a good, but too big, library.
I can think of a few alternatives, although I can't speak for how they compare to Thrift. All of these should have Java, C++, and Python implementations.
Google Protobuf
Apache Avro
Hessian
Of the three, I think Google's Protobuf seems the most promising and documented.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
Questions asking us to recommend or find a tool, library or favorite off-site resource are off-topic for Stack Overflow as they tend to attract opinionated answers and spam. Instead, describe the problem and what has been done so far to solve it.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
I have a Web Service and I'm trying to add a simple Web User interface with the ability of adding some text and uploading file. what is the simplest and easiest one to use and compatible with Java. I'm using eclipse to develop my application.
I don't need a lot of support I just want it to be easy to use.
I can recommend wicket (http://wicket.apache.org/) you won't have licence restrictions (it's an Apache licence) and it's a time resistent solution: JSF are too complex for simple use cases, and Struts is quite as complicated but a rather old technology. GWT is too complex and time conuming for small projects.
You can naturally use bare Servlets or JSPs if you're really in very simple use cases.
Best Regards,
Zied Hamdi
http://1vu.fr
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
Questions asking us to recommend or find a tool, library or favorite off-site resource are off-topic for Stack Overflow as they tend to attract opinionated answers and spam. Instead, describe the problem and what has been done so far to solve it.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
I've used Mina and Netty, but now I'm in the market for a lightweight library that may also be used in Android. I prefer Nio or AsyncIo over standard io implementations.
Update 1
The lack of responses really makes me think I should write my own library. Right now I'm using raw NIO and its not a lot of fun.
You might try using some pieces from Jetty as suggested in this email. I really like Jetty because it's small, self contained, and you can use some or all of it flexibly.
Since this seems to be dead on arrival, I'll answer it by saying my custom IO library will be the best.
To answer your question, there is no one size fits all async library. Netty and Mina might be the closest to such a thing, but most projects may still have to contain some pure NIO/ASYNCIO customized solutions.
I maintain you are on the right track. The more experience you have with low-level NIO/ASYNCIO the more you will appreciate and be able to get the most out of the somewhat-less-low-level Netty.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
Questions asking us to recommend or find a book, tool, software library, tutorial or other off-site resource are off-topic for Stack Overflow as they tend to attract opinionated answers and spam. Instead, describe the problem and what has been done so far to solve it.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
For a project I need to read and write ESRI shapefiles. It should be very easy, as I don't need advanced features. Is something out there?
GeoTools supports shapefiles via a plugin. GIS is a complicated area and I think what you will find is that there are very few "simple" libraries out there. Any library powerful enough to do general GIS will unfortunately have a learning curve. That said, Shapefiles aren't that complicated and there's a lot of code out there for references purposes.