We Keep Coding

Motion Capture with OpenGL on Atom Board

I am looking to make an arm where each joint can be controlled given an input. For example, I would receive a location each millisecond and I would need each joint to move to that new location. This is going to be used to simulate motion capture. Are there any good tutorials about how to do this. I am programming this on an atom board with limited support for openGL. I tried using C++ G3D but it seems to be too complicated for the graphics card. There were some glitches when rendering. Would a more basic OpenGL only approach be better? Are there models for arms that have pivot points built into them?

G3D itself uses OpenGL as a rasterizer backend, so I doubt that would make any differency. After all OpenGL is just a drawing API and doesn't maintain a scene. You send it commands to draw points, lines and triangles and it executes them. It's really nothing more. You need to implement scene management to do anything usefull with OpenGL, and controlling a figure is already a quite complex task.

What should I use to display game graphics?

I have a system in place for a game yet I don't know what I should use to display it. I am making a vertical shooter game and I have written the methods for all the classes controlling enemies and players, but I have not idea how to efficiently display the game. I was thinking a Canvas, that would repaint every frame, but is that really the most efficient method?
Important details:
ideal framerate: 25fps
It is a 2d game
There are anywhere between 25-100 objects on the screen at any one time, all of which are moving
All objects being displayed are images, all in PNG format
The window is 640px by 480px
Right now all the images are loaded as BufferedImage, although I could easily change this
7. I need a coordinate plane. This is the only fundamental part that cannot be changed without completely restructuring my code.
Most importantly the way I have everything set up, every frame all of the objects move and interact in a coordinate plane I devised (deals with collision detection and movement, no graphical component), then everything should get painted to the screen, simply by going through the ArrayLists which keep track of all moving objects and painting them one by one.

If Swing is acceptable, JPanel is double-buffered by default, and a javax.swing.Timer with a period of 40 ms will give you ~25 Hz updates. This example shows the basic approach, while this example shows a number of images in motion.
I need a coordinate plane.
It's not unusual to have the the model and view use different coordinates; all that's needed are functions to map one system to the other. In this game, the view relies on four methods that map tiles to pixels and vice-versa. The same approach is outlined here for map tiles.

You have a number of options available to you:
Firstly, you could use one of the existing Java game frameworks:
JMonkeyEngine (http://jmonkeyengine.com/)
Slick (http://slick.cokeandcode.com/index.php)
(Slick is aimed at 2D graphics, while JMonkey is aimed at 3D and uses OpenGL - While I have looked into their use, I've not actually used them myself)
Alternatively you can code everything yourself. From the sounds of things this is your first (graphical) game, so you may want to read up on a technique known as double buffering, whereby you write each frame off-screen and the just paint the whole thing to screen, as this can lead to smoother animation.
To get you into games development a bit more, I would highly recommend reading this site, Killer Game Programming in Java by Dr Andrew Davison, as he gives some good pointers, and also provides a good progressive learning path for new game developers, and moving them into 2D and then 3D development.
HTH

The answer really depends on whether this game is 2D or 3D.
If your game is 2D, an easy way to do what you want is to use Java's own 2D Graphics API. A good tutorial to start you off (at least in my opinion) can be found at The Java Tutorials. In my experience I have found that Java's graphics API is easy to learn, and is more efficient than one might expect. The basic technique is to have your game code keep track of the positions of all your objects, then translate those coordinates into screen coordinates and display appropriate images at those locations. I made a (very, very simple) game in Java once, and this is the method I used.
If your game is in 3D, OpenGL is definetly the way to go. I have only limited experience with OpenGL, so I'm not sure how easy the Java bindings are to work with. In general, 3D programming is a massive topic, so if this is a first-time project or you aren't prepared for a major time investment, I would attempt to find a good game framework to use or make the game 2D. If you are interested in OpenGL, or 3D programming in general, a quick Google turned up the JOGL project. I would recommend investigating JOGL as a way to access the OpenGL API from within Java code, but for actually learning OpenGL I recommend The OpenGL SuperBible(5th edition), commonly known as "The Blue Book".
The code examples are all in C++, but for the OpenGL functions it could possibly be just a matter of using a wrapper library. For example:
glDrawElements(...);
May become:
JavaGLWrapperObject.glDrawElements(...);
Unfortunately I can't give concrete examples because I haven't used OpenGL with a Java program, but the above example very coarsely approximates how OpenGL ES is used on the Android platform.
As far as performance... Java's API comes with a non-trivial ammount of overhead, but I could see it doing alright for your purposes. You may have to put a little more effort into making your algorithms efficient, and your game may not run as well on less-capable hardware. If you do decide to go the OpenGL route, it will almost certainly be much faster (again, depending on how efficient your algorithms are), but is correspondingly much harder to learn and get started with. Certainly doable, but it will be a challenge.

Canvas will quickly be too slow for 25+ fps targeted.
the number of object is irrelevant, what is is how complex they are.
if it is 100 images will take nothing compared to 1 3D model of Avatar for example.
in Java you can use either Opengl or Java3D
I would tend to go with Opengl as a personel choise

2D OpenGL Canvas Replacement

I've created a prototype for a 2d android game using the android canvas object. Unfortunately, the performance is suffering greatly due to the large number of bitmaps that need to be redrawn frequently.
I'd like to migrate the drawing code to opengl, but I have no experience with it, and I'm having a difficult time getting the views configured properly. I've tried a wide variety of methods, but I'm not sure if the view configurations were wrong, of if the drawing functions didn't match.
Since most of my touch events are based on the coordinates, I'd like to have the opengl canvas view's coordinate system match the touch event coordinate system if possible. This would allow me to reuse a lot of code and avoid a lot of coordinate translation.
Can someone provide code or a link to code that would accomplish setting up a view and drawing a textured element?

I do not know how this question got overlooked but if you want a light introduction to OpenGL ES then you should take a look here. It is pretty good an explains things slowly enough that it is reasonably easy to understand.

Hardware accelerate bitmap drawing in java

I want to be able to draw consecutive bitmaps (of type BufferedImage.TYPE_INT_RGB) of a video as quickly as possible in java. I want to know the best method in doing so. Does anyone have any advice where I should start? From what I've read, 2 options are:
1) Use GDI/GDI+ routines in a JNI dll working with JAWT (Im on Windows)
2) Use Java3D and apply Textures to a Box's face and rotate it to the camera
Im interesting in any advice on these topics as well as any others.
I have done a decent amount of GDI/GDI+ programming in VB when i created an ActiveX control, so using GDI should be painless, but im guessing Java3D will utilize the GPU more (I could be wrong) and give better performance. What do you think? GDI and JAWT with my previous experience, or start and new API journey with Java3D.
Thanks in advance. :)

To obtain a fluid animation (if it what you want to get), you need to use double buffering. For doing this, you will need to create a new java.awt.Image (or a subclass like BufferedImage, or if you want OpenGL accelerated processing, VolatileImage) for each frame you want to display. If you haven't already done so, call Image.getGraphics() to get a java.awt.Graphics object (can also be useful to add your content to the Image). At the end, when you hidden Image is complete, call Graphics.draw() to replace the current display smoothly.
VolatileImage is OpenGL accelerated and much faster. When VolatileImage.getGraphics() is called, it actually returns a Graphics2D, which is also part of the accelerated graphic pipeline.
It works on Windows, Linux and Solaris, but you need to have OpenGL drivers installed for your graphic card.
Some additional refs:
Accelerated graphic pipeline:
http://download.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/guide/2d/new_features.html
http://www.javalobby.org/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=16840&tstart=0
Double buffering:
http://www.java2s.com/Code/Java/2D-Graphics-GUI/Smoothmoveusingdoublebuffer.htm
http://www.heatonresearch.com/articles/23/page2.html
http://www.javacooperation.gmxhome.de/BildschirmflackernEng.html

OpenGL Shaders?

I'm writing a game in Java, LJGWL (OpenGL). I'm using a library that handles a lot of messy details for me, but need to find a lot faster way to do this.
Basically I want to set every pixel on the screen to say a random color as fast a possible. The "random colors" is just an Array [][] that gets updated every 2-3 seconds. I've tried drawing rects and using images, both are pretty slow for what I want to do.
I think I want to learn how to write a GPU shader? That is the fastest way to do this? LJGWL exposes OpenGL api to java. Any basic tutorials on how to get started with OpenGL shaders? Or should I dynamically create a texture of some sort and then just throw up the entire texture, would that be faster?

If it were the case that you were statically displaying the same image, than using a texture or display list would suffice. But as you want to frequently update it, shaders really are the best option. Shader code executes on the GPU and modifies data in GRAM, so you have no bottle neck transferring from CPU to GPU. The next best thing would probably be a Pixel or Frame Buffer Object. Buffer Objects let you read/write to GRAM via DMA (without having to go through the CPU) so they can be pretty fast.
I haven't written any shaders yet, so I can't recommend any good resources. But SongHo's OpenGL pages are a good place to learn about Buffer Objects. (His examples are in C++ though)

Textures are the fastest way to draw something on screen, draw a texture mapped quad into the screen, it should be fast enough. When you need to reupload the texture data, use glTexSubimage2D to update it.
No need to use shaders.

I've yet to do any work with shaders in OpenGL, but given the same scenario in multiple occasions, I handled it with a texture I threw up across the screen on top, and it worked quite effectively.

I don't know how you are drawing your pixels exactly, but this limit you hit could be because of the amount of data you transfer (inefficiently?). Updating a screen full of pixels every 2-3 seconds shouldn't be hard at all. Although shaders bring you closer to the graphics card, they will never make inefficient methods fast, so...
Why is your code so slow?
What code? What code exactly did you try? What texture did you use, render to, ...?
Is it slow? How slow? How fast do you expect it to be?
How quickly can one get 1920x1080(?) pixels in video ram, what's your hardware, drivers, OS?
I think you need to edit/repost before we can help you solve your problem. Just because it is slow, is no guarantee at all that shaders will even be one bit faster.