Based on the following code snippet :
Hashtable balance = new Hashtable();
Enumeration names;
String str;
double bal;
balance.put("Zara", new Double(3434.34)); //first entry for Zara
balance.put("Mahnaz", new Double(123.22));
balance.put("Zara", new Double(1378.00)); //second entry for Zara
balance.put("Daisy", new Double(99.22));
balance.put("Qadir", new Double(-19.08));
System.out.println(balance.entrySet());
.
Output : [Qadir=-19.08, Mahnaz=123.22, Daisy=99.22, Zara=1378.0]
Why isn't chaining happening here? When I re-enter with Zara as key the old value is overwritten. I expected it to be added at the end of the Linked List at Zara".hashcode() index.
Does Java use separate chaining only for collision handling?
If I can't use chaining( as I'v tried above) please suggest a common method to do so.
Does Java use separate chaining only for collision handling?
Yes. You can only have one entry per key in a Hashtable (or HashMap, which is what you should probably be using - along with generics). It's a key/value map, not a key/multiple-values map. In the context of a hash table, the term "collision" is usually used for the situation where two unequal keys have the same hash code. They still need to be treated as different keys, so the implementation has to cope with that. That's not the situation you're in.
It sounds like you might want a multi-map, such as one of the ones in Guava. You can then ask a multimap for all values associated with a particular key.
EDIT: If you want to build your own sort of multimap, you'd have something like:
// Warning: completely untested
public final class Multimap<K, V> {
private final Map<K, List<V>> map = new HashMap<>();
public void add(K key, V value) {
List<V> list = map.get(key);
if (list == null) {
list = new ArrayList();
map.put(key, list);
}
list.add(value);
}
public Iterable<V> getValues(K key) {
List<V> list = map.get(key);
return list == null ? Collections.<V>emptyList()
: Collections.unmodifiableList(list);
}
}
Quote from the documentation of Map (which Hashtable is an implementation of):
An object that maps keys to values. A map cannot contain duplicate keys; each key can map to at most one value.
(emphasis mine)
The documentation of put() also says:
If the map previously contained a mapping for the key, the old value is replaced by the specified value
So if you want multiple values associated with a key, use a Map<String, List<Double>> instead of a Map<String, Double>. Guava also has a Multimap, which does what you want without having to deal with Lists explicitely as with a Map<String, List<Double>>.
Related
I have a hashamp with only one key (and a value). Lets say I don't know the key or value of that one key. Is there a way to find it? This may sound dumb but since there is only ONE key, then would there be a way to get that key.
For a single key map just do the following:
Map<String,String> map = Map.of("A","B");
System.out.println(map.keySet().iterator().next());
prints
A
For a more populated map you can do the following:
You can get the keySet() of the map via map.keySet() and iterate thru that.
If you want to try and find a particular key associated with a value you can
get the entrySet() of the map and do something like this:
String targetVal = "some value";
for (Entry<String,String> e : map.entrySet()) {
if (e.getValue().equals(targetVal)) {
System.out.println(e.getKey());
// or
System.out.println(e);
// keep iterating since multiple keys can
// map to the same value.
}
}
You can get all of your keys with hash_map.keySet()
https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/hashmap-keyset-method-in-java/
Yes, you can use iterators, which enable you to iterate over any Collection (or Map's entrySet()):
public class Main {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Map<String, String> map = new HashMap<>();
map.put("First", "Entry");
System.out.println(map.entrySet().iterator().next());
}
}
This prints: First=Entry, where First is the key and Entry is the value.
hashMapObj.entrySet().iterator().next();
is the answer to your question.
I have a Hashmap with duplicate keys, want to assign the elements in a Treemap format. I'm trying out this below code but this is not inserting duplicate keys in the Treemap.
HashMap<Integer,Integer> totalCustomersByPin = new HashMap<Integer,Integer>();
TreeMap<Integer,Integer> totalDeliveriesToPin = new TreeMap<Integer,Integer();
Iterator<Entry<Integer, Integer>> iterator = totalCustomersByPin.entrySet().iterator();
while(iterator.hasNext()) {
Entry<Integer, Integer> pair = iterator.next();
totalDeliveriesToPin.put(pair.getValue(), pair.getKey());
}
System.out.println("Top pincodes:" + totalDeliveriesToPin);
Java native maps don't support this. You can use MultiValuedMap from apache commons.
However I assume you want to sort it by numbers of values for the key. You'll need to implement Comparator for this, sorting by the number of values in the collection. TreeMap will not help here.
TreeMap#public V put(K key, V value) according to it's docs
Associates the specified value with the specified key in this map. If the map previously contained a mapping for the key, the old value is replaced.
To do what you are looking for you need a Multimap - which is essentially a Map to a List.
Map<Integer, List<String>> multiMap;
To add an object get the list for that key, if it is null add a list then add your value to the list, otherwise just add your value to the existing list.
I want to determine if a given String startsWith any key in a Map.
The simple solution is to iterate through entire the keySet.
private static Map<String, String> someMap;
private static void method(String line) {
for (String key : someMap.keySet()) {
if (line.startsWith(key)) {
// do something with someMap.get(key);
}
}
}
My question is: Is there is a better data structure to handle this problem?
This can't be done directly with an HashMap: the problem is that HashMap uses an hash calculated on the key to manage its position inside the collection. So there is no way to search for a String key which starts with a specific substring since there is no correlation between two similar String values and their hashes.
But nothing is lost, if you switch to a TreeMap<String,String> the problem can be solved easily. A TreeMap is still an associative container but it stores entries by using a red-black tree in a sorted order.
This means that elements inside a TreeMap are always sorted. In addition to this it gives you some functionalities like:
Map.Entry<K,V> ceilingEntry(K key): Returns a key-value mapping associated with the least key greater than or equal to the given key, or null if there is no such key.
Map.Entry<K,V> floorEntry(K key): Returns a key-value mapping associated with the greatest key less than or equal to the given key, or null if there is no such key.
Now, not only you can search for a specific key by using a substring of its value, but you also do it in an efficient way. Mind that this works thanks to the implementation of compareTo of String class.
So your problem becomes trivial:
TreeMap<String, Object> map = new TreeMap<String, Object>();
map.put("baz", new Object());
map.put("foo", new Object());
map.put("fooz", new Object());
map.put("fo", new Object());
Map.Entry<String, Object> test = map.ceilingEntry("fo");
bool containsSubStringKey = test != null && test.getKey().startsWith("fo");
TreeMap<String, Object> map = new TreeMap<String, Object>();
map.put("baz", new Object());
map.put("foo", new Object());
map.put("fooz", new Object());
map.put("foor", new Object());
NavigableMap tempMap = list.subMap("foo", true, "fop", false);
//This will return a map of keys that start with "foo". true means inclusive and //false exclusive. "fop" is the first key that does not start with "foo"
I have a question about hashmaps with multiple keys to value. Let's say I have (key / value )
1/a, 1/b, 1/3, 2/aa, 2/bb, 2/cc.
Would this work?
If it does, could I have a way to loop through it and display all values for only either key 1 or 2?
You can use a map with lists as values, e.g.:
HashMap<Integer, List<String>> myMap = new HashMap<Integer, List<String>>();
java.util.HashMap does not allow you to map multiple values to a single key. You want to use one of Guava's Multimap's. Read through the interface to determine which implemented version is suitable for you.
A simple MultiMap would look something like this skeleton:
public class MultiMap<K,V>
{
private Map<K,List<V>> map = new HashMap<K,List<V>>();
public MultiMap()
{
// Define constructors
}
public void put(K key, V value)
{
List<V> list = map.get(key);
if (list == null)
{
list = new ArrayList<V>();
map.put(key, list);
}
list.add(value);
}
public List<V> get(K key)
{
return map.get(key);
}
public int getCount(K key)
{
return map.containsKey(key) ? map.get(key).size() : 0;
}
}
It cannot directly implement Map<K,V> because put can't return the replaced element (you never replace). A full elaboration would define an interface MultiMap<K,V> and an implementation class, I've omitted that for brevity, as well as other methods you might want, such as V remove(K key) and V get(K key, int index)... and anything else you can think of that might be useful :-)
Maps will handle multiple keys to one value since only the keys need be unique:
Map(key, value)
However one key to multiple values requires s multimap of a map strict of :
Map(key, list(values))
Also, whatever you use as a key really should implement a good hadhCode() function if you decide to use a HashMap and/or HashSet
Edit: had to use() instead of <> because my mobile or sof's mobile site editor clobbered the <> symbols....odd
I have a HashMap as below (assuming it has 10,0000 elements)
HashMap<String,String> hm = new HashMap<String,String>();
hm.put("John","1");
hm.put("Alex","2");
hm.put("Mike","3");
hm.put("Justin","4");
hm.put("Code","5");
==========================
Expected Output
==========================
Key = John",Value = "1"
Key = Alex",Value = "2"
Key = Mike",Value = "3"
Key = Justin",Value = "4"
Key = Code",Value = "5"
===========================
I need Java code to prevent Addition of Duplicate <Key,Value> Pairs in HashMap such
that below conditions are staisfied.
1> hm.put("John","1"); is not accepted/added again in the Map
2> hm.put("John","2"); is not accepted/added again in the Map
Hope its clear.
Java code provided will be appreciated.(generic solution needed since i can add any duplicate to the existing map)
You can wrap HashMap in a class, which delegates put, get, and other methods you use from HashMap. This method is wasteful but safe, since it doesn't depend on the internal implementation of HashMap, AbstractMap. The code below illustrates put, get delegating:
public class Table {
protected java.util.HashMap<String, Integer> map =
new java.util.HashMap<String, Integer>();
public Integer get(String key) { return map.get(key); }
public Integer put(String key, Integer value) {
if (map.containsKey(key)) {
// implement the logic you need here.
// You might want to return `value` to indicate
// that no changes applied
return value;
} else {
return map.put(key, value);
}
}
// other methods goes here
}
Another option is to make a class which extends HashMap, and depend on its internal implementation. Java 1.6 sources shows that put is called only in putAll in HashMap, so you can simply override put method:
public class Table extends java.util.HashMap<String, Integer> {
public Integer put(String key, Integer value) {
if (containsKey(key)) {
// implement the logic you need here.
// You might want to return `value` to indicate
// that no changes applied
return value;
} else {
return super.put(key, value);
}
}
}
Another option is similar to the first, and can make an utility method in your class which contains the HashMap instance and call that method wherever you need put something to your map:
public final Integer putToMap(String key, String value) {
if(this.map.containsKey(key)) {
return value;
} else {
return this.map.put(key, value);
}
}
This is an "inline" equivalent of checking manually.
I note that you clarify the question by suggesting you might have "100000000 elements". You still won't have duplicates in the HashMap, because, as two other posters have pointed out, you can't get duplicate keys in a Map. I'm still not sure we understand the question, though, as it's not at all clear how you expected to generate the block titled "Output", or what you intend to do with it.
This may be old question but I thought to share my experience with this. As others pointed out you can't have the same element in a HashMap. By default HashMap will not allow this but there are some cases that you could end up with two or more elements are almost alike that you do not accept but HashMap will. For example, the following code defines a HashMap that takes an array of integers as a key then add :
HashMap<int[], Integer> map1 = new HashMap<>();
int[] arr = new int[]{1,2,3};
map1.put(arr, 4);
map1.put(arr, 4);
map1.put(arr, 4);
At this point, the HashMap did not allow dublicating the key and map1.size() will return 1. However, if you added elements without creating the array first things will be different:
HashMap<int[], Integer> map2 = new HashMap<>();
map2.put(new int[]{4,5,6}, 6);
map2.put(new int[]{4,5,6}, 6);
map2.put(new int[]{4,5,6}, 6);
This way, the HashMap will add all the three new elements so the map2.size() will return 3 and not 1 as expected.
The explanation is that with the first map I created the object arr once and tried to add the same object 3 times which HashMap does not allow by default so only the last usage will be considered. With the second map, however, evey time I recreate a new object on the stack. The three objects created are different and separated thought the three of them have the same data but they are different. That's why HashMap allowed them as different keys.
Bottom line, you don't need to prevent HashMap from adding dublicated keys because it won't by design. However, you have to watch out how you define these keys because the fault may be on your side.
List<String> keys = new ArrayList<String>(); (1000000)
List<String> values = new ArrayList<String>(); (1000000)
Map<String, String> map = new HashMap<String, String>();
int i =0;
for(String key : keys){
String returnedValue = map.put(key, values.get(i));
if(returnedValue!=null){
map.put(key, returnedValue);
system.out.println("Duplicate key trying to be entered with new value so reverting the duplicate key ="+key+"new Value"+values.get(i));
}
}
Unfortunately, it is the way that Map works.
The easiest workaround is to remove all pre existed keys and their values by calling hm.remove() first! like this:
for (String name : names) {
hm.remove(name);
hm.put(name,uri.getQueryParameter(name));
}
And if you don't use a for loop just call it like this:
hm.remove("John");
hm.put("John","1");
hm.remove("Alex");
hm.put("Alex","2");
hm.remove("Mike");
hm.put("Mike","3");
And so on ...
see even if u write same key values multiple times you will just have unique set of pairs. Check that by either iterating or by doing hm.size();
if(hm.put("John","1") != null)
{
// "John" was already a key in the map. The sole value for this key is now "1".
}
List<Object> yourElements = new ... // 10000000
for(Object O : yourElements) {
if(myMap.get(O.key)==null) {
myMap.put(O.key,O);
}
}