Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I found it is possible to install JDK8 on Windows XP (to avoid install error - we have to change jdk-8u11-windows-i586.exe file with some HEX editor (for example free XVI32) and change string RegDeleteKeyExA with RegDeleteKeyA filling zeros instead two last letters).
But I wonder if the JDK8 will work without further problems - I mean related to various .dll and other files of Windows XP?
First link on Google:
Can I install Java 8 on Windows XP?
Java 8 is not supported on Windows XP, and Windows XP users will be
unable to install Java 8 on their systems as there are known issues
with the installer on Windows XP that prevent it from installing
without manual intervention. If you are on Windows XP it is not clear
that it is worth updating to Java 8 without also updating the OS.
Microsoft doesn't support Windows XP, nor does Oracle.
But it is possible to install it on Windows XP
You can install it but it may or may not work. Even if it works, doesn't mean it is supported.
Related
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
Due to some weird of my office rule, I can only run Windows7 32bit.
I know it's OK to install a 64bit JDK on 32bit Windows, but will it cause problem while my Java program/AndroidAPP runs on any other machine ?
No. Because it will not run. If it did run, then it would be fine. You can use a 32bit JDK on 32bit Windows. You can use a 32bit JDK on 64bit Windows. And you can use a 64bit JDK on 64bit Windows.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I need to run java applet in my Linux machine. So I tried the steps in java.com to install JRE. What should I do after extracting JRE .tar file.I want the java to be available in my Firefox?
You're most likely not looking for JRE, but instead to install the JVM Java install. ie. 'Java 8 update 56' (or the simplified revision download) etc. rather than JRE 8.56.#... Note: The differences in both installs is quite small, but should follow the same steps either way.
The official home of Java and respective download links.
It should be as simple as following the install requirements here. Download the RPM and as an administrator account run (replacing rpm location):
rpm -i /path/to/java.rpm
More information on installing the Java RPM
Edit: If using Ubuntu, there's a perfect answer for this over in the Ubuntu distro forum.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 4 years ago.
Improve this question
I search on the oracle's web but i can't find 32 bits version.
i need to use JMF(Java Multimedia Framework),but don't run correctly with jdk 64 bits. So i can't
find jdk 32 bits for macOS 10.9.4.
Thanks.
The only way to get Java JDK 32-Bit running on your macOS is to use Soylatte as it is described here:
Seapegasus Blog
If you have one of the 2006 Intel Macs with 32-bit processors, you guessed what I'm talking about: In spring '08, Apple finally released the Apple JDK 6 (or as they call it, "Java for Mac OS 10.5"), but for 64-bit processors only. And there is no sign this will change soon: On Mac hardware, Mac OS X 10.5.2 and an Intel Core 2 processor are the minimum requirements for the JDK 6 -- and also for JavaFX.
Apart from switching to Windows or Linux, or buying new hardware, the only alternative for developers who don't meet those requirements is the Soy Latte JDK 6. Using this JDK solves a few problems but also raises some others. You have to decide whether the pros out-weigh the cons in your work situation:
Pro
You can use the JavaFX SDK on top of the SoyLatte JDK
IDEs like NetBeans work with SoyLatte (you're not stuck on the command line)
No need to buy new hardware for JDK 6 / JavaFX development
Con
Must use X11 whose user-interface needs getting used too (shortcuts, menus).
Installation is less straight-forward than installing the Apple JDK
No support for Java Web Start (javaws) yet
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
I have installed Titanium Studio and now I'm getting the error shown in the image when I try to run it. And nothing happens when clicked OK. I searched on the web and re-installed JRE 64bit, set jre/bin and jdk/bin in PATH environment variables, but didn't fix the issue. What am I supposed to do to solve this?
Did you read System Requirements?
From Documentation:
For Windows, the 32-bit version of Java JDK is required regardless of
whether Titanium is running on a 32-bit or 64-bit system.
Try to install additional 32bit version of Java (without removing the 64bit) and set the system variable.
Hope it helped you
If you use a 64-bit JRE, all your environment must be 64-bit:
64-bit OS
64-bit Java (JRE + JDK)
64-bit IDE (Titanium) => As pointed out by #Anand, documentation says:
For Windows, the 32-bit version of Java JDK is required regardless of
whether Titanium is running on a 32-bit or 64-bit system.
Make sure all is fine, then check if jvm.dll exists at the specified location. If not, change it in eclipse.ini, by adding:
-vm
C:\path\to\your\jvm.dll
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I want to download and try an Open-Source OS (Emulation) written in Java. So, I searched and download the, arguably, most famous one I found, which was NACHOS 5.0j.
I have just installed a fresh Ubuntu 10.04 LTS and installed the open-JDK 1.6 through apt-get and then installed eclipse in a similar manner.
After following the readme in NACHOS, I fired terminal, and used gmake (make), and got a bunch of errors and warnings. The one that's bothering me the most is:
as of release 1.4, 'assert' is a keyword, and may not be used as an identifier
(use -source 1.3 or lower to use 'assert' as an identifier)
Debug.assert(isReadyForApply);
Problem is, I tried downloading another open-source OS called JX, and had a similar problem.
Any help in this issue is appreciated! Any other ideas on where to start learning about operating systems and Java is even more appreciated! (But something practical.)
I think you need to add a argument -source 1.3 while compiling or running that OS
I found following information from web, basically, you should use java 1.3.1. it is open source, and you can modify the source code to make it run under JDK1.6 if you like.
The Java version of Nachos only
supports Java 1.3.1, as the security
manager and set of reserved keywords
has changed in later versions.
Instructional machines already have
1.3.1 installed. For remote users, you can download 1.3.1 here:
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/download.html
. If you are curious to see what
version of java you are using you can
run the following command "java
-version". We cannot stress strongly enough that you should not use java
1.4 or java 1.5. You might run into transient errors that will not show up
as warnings or errors during compile
time.