For example, I have the following regular expression:
/lol.*
All strings that matches this expression also matches another expression:
/l.*
How to check that first regex is included into the second one (using JAVA libraries)?
You need to use a lookahead in the second regex inorder to check if the first regex is present in the second or not.
\/l(?=ol).*
In java you don't need to escape forward slash. So the below regex would be enough.
l(?=ol).*
DEMO
Related
I am trying to write a simple regex to match the following:
/path/foo.html
/path/foo.html?a=b
/path/foo.html?a=b&b=c
but not /path/foo.htmlx or anything else which is not foo.html + url parameter.
I tried
/path/foo.html(?:\?|$)
but it does not seem to work in my java project.
String.matches(String regex) does a full match
Tells whether or not this string matches the given regular expression.
An invocation of this method of the form str.matches(regex) yields exactly the same result as the expression
So for example "/path/foo.html?a=b".matches("/path/foo.html(?:\\?|$)") returns false, because the String doesn't end after the ?.
You can use "/path/foo.html(\\?.*)?"
For URL part use regexp provided by #reconnect:
^[^?]*
match from start until ? character meet.
for search exactly /path/foo.html use:
^/path/foo.html
if you need check that part of something exists with matches in the line add ^ - start of line and $ end of line, and in this case you should care about characters between end of your conditions, basically replaced with .*
I'm not exactly understand what you trying to match, but if you want match only URL part without search string:
/^[^?#]*/
# - hash string, too can pass some arguments
I work on a product that provides a Java API to extend it.
The API provides a function which
takes a Perl regular expression and
returns a list of matching files.
I want to filter the list to remove all files that end in .xml, .xsl and .cfg; basically the opposite of .*(\.xml|\.xsl|\.cfg).
I have been searching but I haven't been able to get anything to work yet.
I tried .*(?!\.cfg) and ^((?!cfg).)*$ and \.(?!cfg$|?!xml$|?!xsl$).
I don't know if I am on the right track or not.
Note
I know the regex systems are similar, but I can't get a Java regex working either.
You may use
^(?!.*\.(x[ms]l|cfg)$).+
See the regex demo
Details:
^ - start of a string
(?!.*\.(x[ms]l|cfg)$) - a negative lookahead that fails the match if any 0+ chars other than line break chars (.*) are followed with xml, xsl or cfg ((x[ms]l|cfg)) at the end of the string ($)
.+ - any 1 or more chars other than linebreak chars. Might be omitted if the entire string match is not required (in some tools it is required though).
You need something like this, which matches only if the end of the string isn't preceded by a dot and one of the three unwanted types
/(?<!\.(?:xml|xsl|cfg))\z/
I am totally confused right now.
What is a word that matches: ^.*(?=.*\\d)(?=.*[a-zA-Z])(?=.*[!##$%^&]).*$
I tried at Regex 101 this 1Test#!. However that does not work.
I really appreciate your input!
What happens is that your regex seems to be in Java-flavor (Note the \\d)
that is why you have to convert it to work with regex101 which does not work with jave (only works with php, phyton, javascript)
see converted regex:
^.*(?=.*\d)(?=.*[a-zA-Z])(?=.*[!##$%^&]).*$
which will match your string 1Test#!. Demo here: http://regex101.com/r/gE3iQ9
You just want something that matches that regex?
Here:
a1a!
This pattern matches
\dTest#!
if u want a pattern which matches 1Test#! try this pattern
^.(?=.\d)(?=.[a-zA-Z])(?=.[!##$%^&]).*$
Your java string ^.*(?=.*\\d)(?=.*[a-zA-Z])(?=.*[!##$%^&]).*$ encodes the regexp expression ^.*(?=.*\d)(?=.*[a-zA-Z])(?=.*[!##$%^&]).*$.
This is because the \ is an escape sequence.
The latter matches the string you specified.
If your original string was a regexp, rather than a java string, it would match strings such as \dTest#!
Also you should consider removing the first .*, doing so would make the regexp more efficient. The reason is that regexp's by default are greedy. So it will start by matching the whole string to the initial .*, the lookahead will then fail. The regexp will backtrack, matchine the first .* to all but the last character, and will fail all but one of the loohaheads. This will proceed until it hits a point where the different lookaheads succeed. Dropping the first .*, putting the lookahead immidiately after the start of string anchor, will avoid this problem, and in this case the set of strings matched will be the same.
when I tried this regex
\"(\S\S+)\"(?!;c)
on this string "MM:";d it comes as matched as I wanted
and on this string "MM:";c it comes as not matched as desired.
But when I add a second group, by moving the semicolon inside that group and making it optional using |
\"(\S\S+)\"(;|)(?!c)
for this string "MM:";c it comes as matched when I expected it to not like before.
I tried this on Java and then on Javascript using Regex tool debuggex:
This link contains a snippet of the above
What am I doing wrong?
note the | is so it is not necessary to have a semicolon.Also in the examples I put c, it is just a substitute in the example for a word, that's why I am using negative lookahead.
After following Holgers response of using Possessive Quantifiers,
\"(\S\S+)\";?+(?!c)
it worked, here is a link to it on RegexPlanet
I believe that the regex will do what it can to find a match; since your expression said the semicolon could be optional, it found that it could match the entire expression (since if the semicolon is not consumed by the first group, it becomes a "no-match" for the negative lookahead. This has to do with the recursive way that regex works: it keeps trying to find a match...
In other words, the process goes like this:
MM:" - matched
(;|) - try semicolon? matched
(?!c) - oops - negative lookahead fails. No match. Go back
(;|) - try nothing. We still have ';c' left to match
(?!c) - negative lookahead not matched. We have a match
An update (based on your comment). The following code may work better:
\"(\S\S+)\"(;|)((?!c)|(?!;c))
Debuggex Demo
The problem is that you don’t want to make the semicolon optional in the sense of regular expression. An optional semicolon implies that the matcher is allowed to try both, matching with or without it. So even if the semicolon is there the matcher can ignore it creating an empty match for the group letting the lookahead succeed.
But you want to consume the semicolon if it’s there, so it is not allowed to be used to satisfy the negative look-ahead. With Java’s regex engine that’s pretty easy: use ;?+
This is called a “possessive quantifier”. Like with the ? the semicolon doesn’t need to be there but if it’s there it must match and cannot be ignored. So the regex engine has no alternatives any more.
So the entire pattern looks like \"(\S\S+)\";?+(?!c) or \"(\S\S+)\"(;?+)(?!c) if you need the semicolon in a group.
I have a list of strings like
xxx_2pathway
xxx_6pathway
xxx_pathway
So I have a string followed by an underscore and "pathway". There may be a digit between the underscore and "pathway". How can I match and replace everything except xxx with a regular expression in Java?
This does not work:
pathnameRaw = pathnameRaw.replace("_\\dpathway","");
Your regex is almost fine. Since the digit is optional, add a ? at the end of \\d.
Also the replace method does not use regex. Use replaceAll instead.
See it
"_[0-9]?pathway"