count islands of zeros in a matrix - java

I am trying to program following well-known counting islands problem.
and it is not giving me the expected output. Where am I going wrong?
My assumption is if 0's touch 0th row or column or dimension of matrix .. it will not be treated as island
Here is my code
public class Matrix {
static int rowCount = 5;
static int columnCount = 4;
static int[][] matrix = { {1,1,1,1,1},
{1,0,0,0,1},
{1,1,1,1,1},
{1,1,1,0,1}
};
static boolean[][] visited = new boolean[rowCount][columnCount];
private static int countIslands = 0;
public static void main(String[] args) {
try{
for(int i=0; i<rowCount; i++){
for(int j=0; j<columnCount; j++){
if(matrix[i][j]==0){
checkZeros(matrix, i, j);
System.out.println("returned " + i + j);
}
}
}
System.out.println(visited);
}catch(Exception e){
}
System.out.println(countIslands);
}
private static void checkZeros(int[][] matrix2, int i, int j) {
boolean valueWithinLimits = withinLimits(i,j);
System.out.println("checking for " + i + j);
if(valueWithinLimits) && checkAlreadyVisited(i,j)){
if(matrix[i][j+1]==0){
checkZeros(matrix2, i, j+1);
}
if(matrix[i+1][j+1]==0){
checkZeros(matrix2, i+1, j+1);
}
if(matrix[i+1][j]==0){
checkZeros(matrix2, i+1, j);
}
if(matrix[i+1][j-1]==0){
checkZeros(matrix2, i-1, j-1);
}
visited[i][j] = true;
System.out.println("i reached here when ij are : " + i + j);
countIslands ++;
}
}
private static boolean checkAlreadyVisited(int i, int j) {
System.out.println("visited found for " + i + j);
return visited[i][j-1] || visited[i-1][j-1] || visited[i-1][j] || visited[i-1][j+1];
}
private static boolean withinLimits(int i, int j) {
return (i>0 && i<rowCount-1 && j>0 && j<columnCount-1);
}
}

The below solution is tested and works perfectly fine for any possibility
package com.divyanshu.island;
/**
* <b>Assumption 1 : 1 is Land, 0 is water.</b>
* <b>Assumption 2 : It is all water outside the matrix.</b>
*
* Instantiate IslandCounter by passing a m*n matrix.
* Method getIslandCount gives you the count of island formed.
*
* </br></br>Or</br></br>
*
* Method getIslandCount gives the count of all connected 1s in a m*n matrix with values in 1 or 0.
*/
public class IslandCounter {
private Integer[][] matrix;
public IslandCounter(Integer[][] matrix) {
this.matrix = matrix;
}
public int getIslandCount() {
int count = 0;
if (matrix == null || matrix.length == 0) {
return count;
}
Integer[][] tempMatrix = matrix.clone();
for (int i = 0; i < tempMatrix.length; i++) {
for (int j = 0; j < tempMatrix[i].length; j++) {
if (detectIsland(tempMatrix, false, i, j, matrix.length - 1, matrix[i].length - 1)) {
count++;
}
}
}
return count;
}
private boolean detectIsland(Integer[][] tempMatrix,
boolean islandDetected,
int i,
int j,
int iMax,
int jMax) {
if (i > iMax || j > jMax || i < 0 || j < 0 || tempMatrix[i][j] == 0) {
return islandDetected;
} else {
tempMatrix[i][j] = 0;
islandDetected = true;
detectIsland(tempMatrix, islandDetected, i - 1, j, iMax, jMax);
detectIsland(tempMatrix, islandDetected, i, j - 1, iMax, jMax);
detectIsland(tempMatrix, islandDetected, i + 1, j, iMax, jMax);
detectIsland(tempMatrix, islandDetected, i, j + 1, iMax, jMax);
}
return islandDetected;
}
}
===================================================================================
/**
*
*/
package com.divyanshu.island;
import java.util.Random;
/**
*This is a Main-Class to test the IslandCounter.
*/
public class IslandTest {
/**
* #param args
*/
public static void main(String[] args) {
Integer[][] matrix = generateMatrix();
printMatrix(matrix);
IslandCounter counter = new IslandCounter(matrix);
System.out.println("Total islands in the matrix : " + counter.getIslandCount());
}
private static Integer[][] generateMatrix() {
Integer[][] matrix = new Integer[4][4];
Random random = new Random();
for (int i = 0; i < matrix.length; i++) {
for (int j = 0; j < matrix[i].length; j++) {
matrix[i][j] = random.nextInt(2);
}
}
return matrix;
}
private static void printMatrix(Integer[][] matrix) {
for (int i = 0; i < matrix.length; i++) {
for (int j = 0; j < matrix[i].length; j++) {
System.out.print(matrix[i][j] + " ");
}
System.out.println();
}
}
}

What you can do to improve is to add an exclusion array: an array of elements that are zeros. For example, if you find a zero within limits, you can start looking around and see if there are any zeros. Keep looking until you find all of them. Then add every single one of these zeros to the exclusion array, and when you continue with the loop, make sure it skips the elements in the exclusion array. This is not code, but the outline of the logic of the program.

I think there are multiple problems in your code.
Your visited matrix is full of false, which mean that checkAlreadyVisited will always return false. Also, I don't understand why does this method checks surroundings to see if the current location is visited. Using a temporary matrix like visited is a good idea, but you should print both map to ensure that it works.
countIslands is never incremented because of the previous error, but once you'll have resolved it, it will be incremented on every call (which should match the number of 0 on your map). If you want his solution to work with the border constraint, you must apply his detectIsland on each border before the for loop.
Divyanshu's solution works, except that it counts 1 and doesn't consider that an island touching a border is not an island (as you said).
To correct your solution, the visited matrix must be a copy of the matrix before using it, checkAlreadyVisited should only scan [i][j] and not its surrondings, and you shouldn't increment countIslands at each call.
Again, print your maps at each turns and use an easier matric like:
static int[][] matrix = {{1,1,1},
{1,0,1},
{1,1,1},};
(Didn't saw this question was three monsth old... anyway, here you go)

Related

Adding all solutions of N Queen Problem to an arrayList

The n-queens puzzle is the problem of placing n queens on a (n×n) chessboard such that no two queens can attack each other.
I used backtracking to solve the problem. But I ran in a strange issue.
Below is the code I wrote:
import java.util.ArrayList;
public class NQueenProblem {
static ArrayList<ArrayList<Integer>> ans = new ArrayList<ArrayList<Integer>>();
static ArrayList<ArrayList<Integer>> nQueen(int n) {
ArrayList<Integer> positions = new ArrayList<Integer>();
//boolean[][] placed = new boolean[n][n];
solveNQueenRec(n, 0, new boolean[n][n], positions);
//for dubugging purpose. This prints empty arrays. not able to understand why?
for (ArrayList<Integer> list : ans)
System.out.println(list);
return ans;
}
static void solveNQueenRec(int n, int col, boolean[][] placed, ArrayList<Integer> positions) {
if (col == n) {
//for debugging process
System.out.println("Adding " + positions);
ans.add(positions);
System.out.println("Added " + positions);
}
for (int row = 0; row < n && col < n; row++) {
if (isSafe(row, col, placed, n)) {
placed[row][col] = true;
positions.add(row + 1);
solveNQueenRec(n, col + 1, placed, positions);
placed[row][col] = false;
positions.remove(positions.size() - 1);
}
}
// return null;
}
private static boolean isSafe(int row, int col, boolean[][] placed, int n) {
boolean safe = true;
// checking if exists in same row
for (int i = 0; i < col; i++) {
if (placed[row][i])
safe = false;
}
// checking for upper diagonal
for (int i = row, j = col; i >= 0 && j >= 0; i--, j--) {
if (placed[i][j])
safe = false;
}
// checking for lower diagonal
for (int i = row, j = col; i < n && j >= 0; i++, j--) {
if (placed[i][j])
safe = false;
}
return safe;
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
nQueen(4);
}
}
What I am not able to understand is why my ans is empty when I could see in logs list being added to my ans. Am I doing some silly mistake. Please help me with the issue. If possible please help me with links to understand the issue and how could I avoid these issues in future.
I think you believe that when the JVM executes
ans.add(positions);
that it is taking a copy of the current state of positions and adding it to the list. It isn't, it is doing exactly what the code says: adding a reference to an ArrayList to ans.
All the items in ans are references to the same ArrayList, and that array list is empty when you print out ans.
ans.add(positions);
is your "problem". You are just adding to ans a reference to the list positions. Thus ans is full of references to the same positions list. As you modify positions several time after insertion, until emptied it, at the end ans is full of n references (n being the number of solutions found) the same positions list that is empty at the end.
What you need is to insert a copy of the current positions list at the time a solution is found:
ans.add(new ArrayList<Integer>(positions));
copy is obtained by constructing a new list with the exact content of the original one.
Add this checking make sure it is greater than zero, then print out the answer. Moreover, add the print queen function, your will see the answer clearly. If this solve your problem, please make as answer.
for (ArrayList<Integer> list : ans) {
if (list.size() > 0)
System.out.println(list);
}
static void solveNQueenRec(int n, int col, boolean[][] placed, ArrayList<Integer> positions) {
if (col == n)
printQueens(positions);
for (int row = 0; row < n && col < n; row++) {
if (isSafe(row, col, placed, n)) {
placed[row][col] = true;
positions.add(row + 1);
solveNQueenRec(n, col + 1, placed, positions);
placed[row][col] = false;
positions.remove(positions.size() - 1);
}
}
// return null;
}
public static void printQueens(ArrayList<Integer> q) {
int n = q.size();
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
for (int j = 1; j <= n; j++) {
if (q.get(i) == j)
System.out.print("Q ");
else
System.out.print("* ");
}
System.out.println();
}
System.out.println();
}
solution to 4-queens sample:
* Q * *
* * * Q
Q * * *
* * Q *
* * Q *
Q * * *
* * * Q
* Q * *

Java set/setElementAt not setting the right value

I need to find all the permutations for a given n(user input) without backtracking.
What i tried is:
import java.util.Scanner;
import java.util.Vector;
class Main {
private static int n;
private static Vector<Vector<Integer>> permutations = new Vector<>();
private static void get_n() {
Scanner user = new Scanner(System.in);
System.out.print("n = ");
n = user.nextInt();
}
private static void display(Vector<Vector<Integer>> permutations) {
for (int i = 0; i < factorial(n) - 1; ++i) {
for (int j = 0; j < n; ++j) {
System.out.print(permutations.elementAt(i).elementAt(j) + " ");
}
System.out.println();
}
}
private static int factorial(int n) {
int result = 1;
for (int i = 1; i <= n; ++i) {
result *= i;
}
return result;
}
private static int max(Vector<Integer> permutation) {
int max = permutation.elementAt(0);
for (int i = 1; i < permutation.size(); ++i)
if (permutation.elementAt(i) > max)
max = permutation.elementAt(i);
return max;
}
// CHECKS FOR ELEMENT COUNT AND 0 - (n-1) APPARITION
public static int validate_permutation(Vector<Integer> permutation) {
// GOOD NUMBER OF ELEMENTS
if (max(permutation) != permutation.size() - 1)
return 0;
// PROPER ELEMENTS APPEAR
for (int i = 0; i < permutation.size(); ++i)
if (!permutation.contains(i))
return 0;
return 1;
}
private static Vector<Integer> next_permutation(Vector<Integer> permutation) {
int i;
do {
i = 1;
// INCREMENT LAST ELEMENT
permutation.set(permutation.size() - i, permutation.elementAt(permutation.size() - i) + 1);
// IN A P(n-1) PERMUTATION FOUND n. "OVERFLOW"
while (permutation.elementAt(permutation.size() - i) == permutation.size()) {
// RESET CURRENT POSITION
permutation.set(permutation.size() - i, 0);
// INCREMENT THE NEXT ONE
++i;
permutation.set(permutation.size() - i, permutation.elementAt(permutation.size() - i) + 1);
}
} while (validate_permutation(permutation) == 0);
// OUTPUT
System.out.print("output of next_permutation:\t\t");
for (int j = 0; j < permutation.size(); ++j)
System.out.print(permutation.elementAt(j) + " ");
System.out.println();
return permutation;
}
private static Vector<Vector<Integer>> permutations_of(int n) {
Vector<Vector<Integer>> permutations = new Vector<>();
// INITIALIZE PERMUTATION SET WITH 0
for (int i = 0; i < factorial(n); ++i) {
permutations.addElement(new Vector<>());
for(int j = 0; j < n; ++j)
permutations.elementAt(i).addElement(0);
}
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i)
permutations.elementAt(0).set(i, i);
for (int i = 1; i < factorial(n); ++i) {
// ADD THE NEXT PERMUTATION TO THE SET
permutations.setElementAt(next_permutation(permutations.elementAt(i - 1)), i);
System.out.print("values set by permutations_of:\t");
for (int j = 0; j < permutations.elementAt(i).size(); ++j)
System.out.print(permutations.elementAt(i).elementAt(j) + " ");
System.out.println("\n");
}
System.out.print("\nFinal output of permutations_of:\n\n");
display(permutations);
return permutations;
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
get_n();
permutations.addAll(permutations_of(n));
}
}
Now, the problem is obvious when running the code. next_permutation outputs the correct permutations when called, the values are set correctly to the corresponding the vector of permutations, but the end result is a mass copy of the last permutation, which leads me to believe that every time a new permutation is outputted by next_permutation and set into the permutations vector, somehow that permutation is also copied over all of the other permutations. And I can't figure out why for the life of me.
I tried both set, setElementAt, and an implementation where I don't initialize the permutations vector fist, but add the permutations as they are outputted by next_permutation with add() and I hit the exact same problem. Is there some weird way in which Java handles memory? Or what would be the cause of this?
Thank you in advance!
permutations.setElementAt(next_permutation(permutations.elementAt(i - 1)), i);
This is literally setting the vector at permutations(i) to be the same object as permutations[i-1]. Not the same value - the exact same object. I think this the source of your problems. You instead need to copy the values in the vector.

Subset sum negative values

I was wondering how to work with negative values and a negative target, right now my program gives index out of bounds errors whenever negative values are given to these variables. I need my hasSum function work with negative values for this project, I can't just assume positive.
import java.util.Stack;
import java.util.Scanner;
public class subsetSum {
static Scanner input = new Scanner(System.in);
static {
System.out.print("Enter the target (T)" + "\n");
}
/** Set a value for target sum */
static int TARGET_SUM = input.nextInt(); //this is the target
/** Store the sum of current elements stored in stack */
static int sumInStack = 0;
Stack<Integer> stack = new Stack<Integer>();
public static void main(String[] args) {
//the size is S
System.out.println("\n" + "Enter the size of the set (S)");
int values = input.nextInt(); //size = "values"
//value of each size entry
System.out.println("\n" + "Enter the value of each entry for S");
int [] numbers = new int[values];
for(int i = 0; i < values; i++) //for reading array
{
numbers[i] = input.nextInt();
}
if(hasSum(numbers, TARGET_SUM)){
System.out.println("\n" + "Can: ");
subsetSum get = new subsetSum(); // encapsulation
get.populateSubset(numbers, 0, numbers.length);
}else{
System.out.println("\n" + "Cannot");
}
}
//method based on dynamic programming O(sum*length)
public static boolean hasSum(int [] array, int sum)
{
int i;
int len = array.length;
boolean[][] table = new boolean[sum + 1][len + 1]; //this has to be changed for negative
//If sum is zero; empty subset always has a sum 0; hence true
for(i = 0; i <= len; i++){
table[0][i] = true;
}
//If set is empty; no way to find the subset with non zero sum; hence false
for(i = 1; i <= sum; i++){
table[i][0] = false;
}
//calculate the table entries in terms of previous values
for(i = 1; i <= sum; i++)
{
for(int j = 1; j <= len; j++)
{
table[i][j] = table[i][j - 1];
if(!table[i][j] && i >= array[j - 1]){
table[i][j] = table[i - array[j - 1]][j - 1];
}
}
}
return table[sum][len]; //this has to be changed for negative
}
public void populateSubset(int[] data, int fromIndex, int endIndex) {
/*
* Check if sum of elements stored in Stack is equal to the expected
* target sum.
*
* If so, call print method to print the candidate satisfied result.
*/
if (sumInStack >= TARGET_SUM) {
if (sumInStack == TARGET_SUM) {
print(stack);
}
// there is no need to continue when we have an answer
// because nothing we add from here on in will make it
// add to anything less than what we have...
return;
}
for (int currentIndex = fromIndex; currentIndex < endIndex; currentIndex++) {
if (sumInStack + data[currentIndex] <= TARGET_SUM) {
stack.push(data[currentIndex]);
sumInStack += data[currentIndex];
/*
* Make the currentIndex +1, and then use recursion to proceed
* further.
*/
populateSubset(data, currentIndex + 1, endIndex);
sumInStack -= (Integer) stack.pop();
}
}
}
/**
* Print satisfied result. i.e. 5 = 1, 4
*/
private void print(Stack<Integer> stack) {
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
for (Integer i : stack) {
sb.append(i).append(",");
}
// .deleteCharAt(sb.length() - 1)
System.out.println(sb.deleteCharAt(sb.length() - 1).toString());
}
}
Are you trying to find a sum of subset or a subarray?
If a subset, then a simple recursion could do the trick, e.g.:
public static boolean hasSum(int [] array, int sum)
{
return hasSum(array, 0, 0, sum);
}
private static boolean hasSum(int[] array, int index, int currentSum, int targetSum) {
if (currentSum == targetSum)
return true;
if (index == array.length)
return false;
return hasSum(array, index + 1, currentSum + array[index], targetSum) || // this recursion branch includes current element
hasSum(array, index + 1, currentSum, targetSum); // this doesn't
}
If you're trying to find a subarray, I'd use prefix sums, e.g.:
public static boolean hasSum(int [] array, int sum)
{
int[] prefixSums = new int[array.length];
for (int i = 0; i < prefixSums.length; i++) {
prefixSums[i] = (i == 0) ? array[i] : array[i] + prefixSums[i - 1];
}
for (int to = 0; to < prefixSums.length; to++) {
if (prefixSums[to] == sum)
return true; // interval [0 .. to]
for (int from = 0; from < to; from++) {
if (prefixSums[to] - prefixSums[from] == sum)
return true; // interval (from .. to]
}
}
return false;
}
BTW I think reading the input values from Scanner inside the static initializer is a bad idea, why don't you move them to main()?

How use other written methods with present method

I wrote a program for this problem:
“Write a program that, given an array array[] of n numbers and another number x, determines whether or not there exist two elements in array whose sum is exactly x.”
Which is this:
boolean hasArrayTwoCandidates (int array[], int sum) {
int length = array.length;
quickSort(array, 0, length-1);
int first, last;
first = 0;
last = length-1;
while(first < last){
if( array[first] + array[last] == sum )
return true;
else if( array[first] + array[last] < sum )
first++;
else // array[i] + array[j] > sum
last--;
}
return false;
}
At first place, I don't know where should I put or add "quick sort" codes. I have this problem with other programs, as well; when I want to add written methods to the present one.
Should I create a "new class" under this "project" and put "quicksort" codes there?
Should I put them in this class? but how can I use it?
At second place, I don't know what should I write in my "main method"?
this is my quicksort codes:
public void sort(int[] values) {
if (values == null || values.length == 0){
return;
}
this.array = values;
length = values.length;
quickSort(this.array, 0, length - 1);
}
private void quickSort(int[] array, int low, int high) {
int i = low, j = high;
int pivot = array[low + (high-low)/2];
while (i <= j) {
while (array[i] < pivot) {
i++;
}
while (array[j] > pivot) {
j--;
}
if (i <= j) {
exchange(i, j);
i++;
j--;
}
}
if (low < j)
quickSort(array, low, j);
if (i < high)
quickSort(array, i, high);
}
private void exchange(int i, int j) {
int temp = array[i];
array[i] = array[j];
array[j] = temp;
}
actually, I dont know what should I write in my "main method" to run this program?
For you Question you can do simply this kind of coding in main method:
public static void main(String[]args) {
int x = 20;
int[] arr = {2,5,4,10,12,5};
System.out.println(hasArrayTwoCandidates(arr,x));
}
make the methods static
static boolean hasArrayTwoCandidates (int array[], int sum)
But there are porblems in your coding:
private void exchange(int i, int j) {
int temp = array[i];
array[i] = array[j];
array[j] = temp;
}
Here the array is not defined. you'll get an error. you have to pass the array too to the method make it as.
private void exchange(int i, int j,int[] array)
But since you are not necessary to do sorting. I recommend this.
static boolean hasArrayTwoCandidates (int array[], int sum) {
boolean flag = false;
for(int i=0;i<array.length-1;i++){
for(int j=i+1;j<array.length ;j++){
if(array[i]+array[j] == sum)
flag = true;
}
}
return flag;
}
this will get one element and check while adding other elements that it is true
Then the main method come same way.
you can put all those method in same class, make hasArrayTwoCandidates() static (Note that main method is static and a static method can have access only to static methods)
public static boolean hasArrayTwoCandidates (int array[], int sum) {
....
}
and in your main method you can test it like this :
public static void main(String[] args){
int[] arr = {2,5,12,5,2,7,15};
System.out.print(hasArrayTwoCandidates(arr, 27));
}
Answering your questions: you can write methods and call them within the same class, just write them with the static modifier:
private static <return_type> <methodName> (<type> param1, <type> param2) {
// Your code here
}
For a program like this, I don't get why you are thinking about sorting the array before checking the sum of 2 numbers within it, when you could do all at once. Check out this code, this may shine a light on you. It is straight-forward and only to see if it clarifies your logic.
import java.util.Random;
public class VerifySum {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Random rand = new Random();
int[] array = new int[10];
// Produce a random number from 10 to 20
int randomSum = rand.nextInt(11) + 10;
// Fill out the array with random integers from 0 to 10
for (int i = 0; i < array.length; i++) {
array[i] = rand.nextInt(11);
}
// Check all array indexes against each other
for (int i = 0; i < array.length - 1; i++) {
for (int j = i + 1; j < array.length; j++) {
if (array[i] + array[j] == randomSum) {
System.out.println(array[i] + " + " + array[j] + " = " + randomSum);
}
}
}
// Print "x"
System.out.println("randomSum = " + randomSum);
// Print array for verification of the functionality
for (int i = 0; i < array.length; i++) {
System.out.println("array [" + i + "] = " + array[i]);
}
}
}
Sometimes making it simpler is more efficient. ;-)

Recursive method for Pascal's triangle

I have written a method to evaluate a Pascal's triangle of n rows. However when I test the method I receive the error:
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: -1
Here is the code:
public static int[] PascalTriangle(int n) {
int[] pt = new int[n + 1];
if (n == 0) {
pt[0] = 1;
return pt;
}
int[] ppt = PascalTriangle(n - 1);
pt[0] = pt[n] = 1;
for (int i = 0; i < ppt.length; i++) {
pt[i] = ppt[i - 1] + ppt[i];
}
return pt;
}
Please let me know if you have any ideas for how the code could be edited to fix the problem.
for(int i = 0; i < ppt.length; i++)
{
pt[i] = ppt[i-1] + ppt[i];
In your first iteration, i == 0 and so (i-1) == -1. This is the cause of the error.
You can special handle the boundaries to avoid this. Or as the others have suggested, start i at 1 instead of 0.
Here is some code a friend of mine came up with
import java.util.Scanner;
public class Pascal {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Scanner scanner = new Scanner(System.in);
System.out.print("Enter the number of rows to print: ");
int rows = scanner.nextInt();
System.out.println("Pascal Triangle:");
print(rows);
scanner.close();
}
public static void print(int n) {
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
for (int k = 0; k < n - i; k++) {
System.out.print(" "); // print space for triangle like structure
}
for (int j = 0; j <= i; j++) {
System.out.print(pascal(i, j) + " ");
}
System.out.println();
}
}
public static int pascal(int i, int j) {
if (j == 0 || j == i) {
return 1;
} else {
return pascal(i - 1, j - 1) + pascal(i - 1, j);
}
}
}
In this code:
pt[0] = pt[n] = 1;
for(int i = 0; i < ppt.length; i++)
{
pt[i] = ppt[i-1] + ppt[i];
}
the problem is that when i is 0, you're trying to access ppt[i-1] which is ppt[-1]. The thing to notice is that when i is 0, you don't need to execute the statement that sets pt[i], because you already set pt[0] up before the loop! Try initializing i to 1 instead of 0.
Improvement in #Clemson code using Dynamic Programming :
class Solution {
int[][] dp ;
public List<List<Integer>> generate(int numRows) {
dp = new int[numRows][numRows];
List<List<Integer>> results = new ArrayList<>();
pascal(results, numRows);
return results;
}
private void pascal(List<List<Integer>> results, int numRows) {
for(int i = 0; i < numRows; i++) {
List<Integer> list = new ArrayList<>();
for(int j = 0; j <= i ; j++) {
list.add(dfs(i, j));
}
results.add(list);
}
}
private int dfs(int i, int j) {
if(j == 0 || i == j) return 1;
if(dp[i][j] != 0) return dp[i][j];
return dp[i][j] = dfs(i - 1, j - 1) + dfs(i - 1, j );
}
}
This isn't the solution to your code but it is solution to printing Pascals Triangle using only recursion which means no loops, using the combinations formula. All it needs is a main method or demo class to create an instance of the PascalsTriangle class. Hope this helps future Java students.
public class PascalsTriangle {
private StringBuilder str; // StringBuilder to display triangle
/**
* Starts the process of printing the Pascals Triangle
* #param rows Number of rows to print
*/
public PascalsTriangle(int rows) {
str = new StringBuilder();
printTriangle(rows, str);
}
/**
* Uses recursion to function as an "outer loop" and calls
* itself once for each row in triangle. Then displays the result
* #param row The number of the row to generate
* #param str StringBuilder to insert each row into
*/
public static void printTriangle(int row, StringBuilder str) {
// calls itself until row equals -1
if (row >= 0) {
// calls lower function to generate row and inserts the result into front of StringBuilder
str.insert(0, getRow(row, 0) + "\n");
// calls itself with a decremented row number
printTriangle(row - 1, str);
} else {
// when the base case is reached - display the result
JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(null, str);
System.exit(0);
}
}
/**
* Uses recursion to act as the "inner loop" and calculate each number in the given row
* #param rowNumber Number of the row being generated
* #param elementNumber Number of the element within the row (always starts with 0)
* #return String containing full row of numbers or empty string when base case is reached
*/
public static String getRow(int rowNumber, int elementNumber) {
// calls itself until elementNumber is greater than rowNumber
if (elementNumber <= rowNumber) {
// calculates element using combinations formula: n!/r!(n-r)!
int element = fact(rowNumber) / (fact(elementNumber) * (fact(rowNumber - elementNumber)));
// calls itself for each element in row and returns full String
return element + " " + getRow(rowNumber, elementNumber + 1);
} else return "";
}
/**
* Helper function that uses recursion to calculate factorial of given integer
* #param n Number to calculate factorial
* #return Factorial
*/
public static int fact(int n) {
if (n <= 0)
return 1;
else
return n * fact(n - 1);
}

Categories