We Keep Coding

How does Spring Core make use of Spring AOP?

I'm trying to understand what Spring AOP is and how it works. The questions I can't answer are the following:
One of the reasons why Spring AOP is not used compared to AspectJ is that Spring AOP cannot add an aspect to anything that is not created by the Spring factory. What does this mean? Isn't everything created from the Spring Factory?
How does Spring Core use the Spring AOP module "behind the scenes"?
What is meant by "Spring AOP is proxy-based"?

One of the reasons why Spring AOP is not used compared to AspectJ is
that Spring AOP cannot add an aspect to anything that is not created
by the Spring factory. What does this mean? Isn't everything created
from the Spring Factory?
In short, that Spring builds proxies for the beans in the Container, and relyies on these proxies to implement AOP.
Regarding the comparison with AspectJ:
From the Spring.io reference docs:
"
...
Thus, for example, the Spring Framework’s AOP functionality is normally used in conjunction with the Spring IoC container. Aspects are configured by using normal bean definition syntax (although this allows powerful “auto-proxying” capabilities). This is a crucial difference from other AOP implementations. You cannot do some things easily or efficiently with Spring AOP, such as advise very fine-grained objects (typically, domain objects). AspectJ is the best choice in such cases. However, our experience is that Spring AOP provides an excellent solution to most problems in enterprise Java applications that are amenable to AOP.
Spring AOP never strives to compete with AspectJ to provide a comprehensive AOP solution. We believe that both proxy-based frameworks such as Spring AOP and full-blown frameworks such as AspectJ are valuable and that they are complementary, rather than in competition. Spring seamlessly integrates Spring AOP and IoC with AspectJ, to enable all uses of AOP within a consistent Spring-based application architecture. This integration does not affect the Spring AOP API or the AOP Alliance API. Spring AOP remains backward-compatible. See the following chapter for a discussion of the Spring AOP APIs."
What is meant by "Spring AOP is proxy-based"?
How does Spring Core use the Spring AOP module "behind the scenes"?
Proxy based means that, beans are wrapped in another object (the proxy) which itercepts the calls to the obejct and can act upon that interception before calling the real method on the wrapped oject.
There are two ways of implementing this, one is using java Dynamic Proxys (Reflection), the other is using CGLIB, a library that adds the proxy capability at bytecode level.
Spring.io reference docs AOP
An article about Proxys

You should read this for comparison https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1606559/spring-aop-vs-aspectj&ved=2ahUKEwim6cD24-DoAhVMzaQKHd4SDfMQFjAMegQICRAB&usg=AOvVaw1Sps_B0sPQPKRD5N9UtOpA&cshid=1586622128032

Should I know EJB in order to study CDI

I was wondering, Should I know EJB as a prerequisite for CDI ? for I've read few CDI samles, found a punch of EJB annotations mixed up with CDI code, If not, Would studying EJB simplifies CDI studying ?
looking forward to reading your awesome answers, thank you .

No EJB is not a prerequisite for CDI but it will help. Refer to this
CDI article for clear distinction.

CDI is a technology you would use to avoid having to manually figure out the dependencies between your objects. With CDI, you only declare that your objects (classes) is dependent on some other objects (classes). The 'CDI container' will create and inject this dependency for you on the runtime
EJB is a technology that focuses on helping you implementing some common enterprise programming problem (storing & retrieving data, invoking remote method etc.).
As of latest version of Java EE, the recommended way to create/obtain reference to EJB is via CDI, but CDI is also applicable for other resources such as datasources, JMS etc
So yes a little knowledge about EJB would help, but I'd say just limit to the basics, don't go too deep. There are vast amount of technologies within Java landscape. They change very fast, and often overlaps each other, so it's easy to get lost when you're trying to learn one. Just focus on CDI itself for time being.

Dependency Injection in OSGI environments

First some background:
I'm working on some webapp prototype code based on Apache Sling which is OSGI based and runs on Apache Felix. I'm still relatively new to OSGI even though I think I've grasped most concepts by now. However, what puzzles me is that I haven't been able to find a "full" dependency injection (DI) framework. I've successfully employed rudimentary DI using Declarative Services (DS). But my understanding is that DS are used to reference -- how do I put this? -- OSGI registered services and components together. And for that it works fine, but I personally use DI frameworks like Guice to wire entire object graphs together and put objects on the correct scopes (think #RequestScoped or #SessionScoped for example). However, none of the OSGI specific frameworks I've looked at, seem to support this concept.
I've started reading about OSGI blueprints and iPOJO but these frameworks seem to be more concerned with wiring OSGI services together than with providing a full DI solution. I have to admit that I haven't done any samples yet, so my impression could be incorrect.
Being an extension to Guice, I've experimented with Peaberry, however I found documentation very hard to find, and while I got basic DI working, a lot of guice-servlet's advanced functionality (automatic injection into filters, servlets, etc) didn't work at all.
So, my questions are the following:
How do declarative services compare to "traditional" DI like Guice or Spring? Do they solve the same problem or are they geared towards different problems?
All OSGI specific solutions I've seen so far lack the concept of scopes for DI. For example, Guice + guice-servlet has request scoped dependencies which makes writing web applications really clean and easy. Did I just miss that in the docs or are these concerns not covered by any of these frameworks?
Are JSR 330 and OSGI based DI two different worlds? iPOJO for example brings its own annotations and Felix SCR Annotations seem to be an entirely different world.
Does anybody have experience with building OSGI based systems and DI? Maybe even some sample code on github?
Does anybody use different technologies like Guice and iPOJO together or is that just a crazy idea?
Sorry for the rather long question.
Any feedback is greatly appreciated.
Updates
Scoped injection: scoped injection is a useful mechanism to have objects from a specific lifecycle automatically injected. Think for example, some of your code relies on a Hibernate session object that is created as part of a servlet filter. By marking a dependency the container will automatically rebuild the object graph. Maybe there's just different approaches to that?
JSR 330 vs DS: from all your excellent answers I see that these are a two different things. That poses the question, how to deal with third party libraries and frameworks that use JSR 330 annotations when used in an OSGI context? What's a good approach? Running a JSR 330 container within the Bundle?
I appreciate all your answers, you've been very helpful!

Overall approach
The simplest way to have dependency injection with Apache Sling, and the one used throughout the codebase, is to use the maven-scr-plugin .
You can annotate your java classes and then at build time invoke the SCR plugin, either as a Maven plugin, or as an Ant task.
For instance, to register a servlet you could do the following:
#Component // signal that it's OSGI-managed
#Service(Servlet.class) // register as a Servlet service
public class SampleServlet implements Servlet {
#Reference SlingRepository repository; // get a reference to the repository
}
Specific answers
How do declarative services compare to "traditional" DI like Guice or Spring? Do they solve the same problem or are they geared towards different problems?
They solve the same problem - dependency injection. However (see below) they are also built to take into account dynamic systems where services can appear or disappear at any time.
All OSGI specific solutions I've seen so far lack the concept of scopes for DI. For example, Guice + guice-servlet has request scoped dependencies which makes writing web applications really clean and easy. Did I just miss that in the docs or are these concerns not covered by any of these frameworks?
I haven't seen any approach in the SCR world to add session-scoped or request-scoped services. However, SCR is a generic approach, and scoping can be handled at a more specific layer.
Since you're using Sling I think that there will be little need for session-scoped or request-scoped bindings since Sling has builtin objects for each request which are appropriately created for the current user.
One good example is the JCR session. It is automatically constructed with correct privileges and it is in practice a request-scoped DAO. The same goes for the Sling resourceResolver.
If you find yourself needing per-user work the simplest approach is to have services which receive a JCR Session or a Sling ResourceResolver and use those to perform the work you need. The results will be automatically adjusted for the privileges of the current user without any extra effort.
Are JSR 330 and OSGI based DI two different worlds? iPOJO for example brings its own annotations and Felix SCR Annotations seem to be an entirely different world.
Yes, they're different. You should keep in mind that although Spring and Guice are more mainstream, OSGi services are more complex and support more use cases. In OSGi bundles ( and implicitly services ) are free come and go at any time.
This means that when you have a component which depends on a service which just became unavailable your component is deactivated. Or when you receive a list of components ( for instance, Servlet implementations ) and one of them is deactivated, you are notified by that. To my knowledge, neither Spring nor Guice support this as their wirings are static.
That's a great deal of flexibility which OSGi gives you.
Does anybody have experience with building OSGI based systems and DI? Maybe even some sample code on github?
There's a large number of samples in the Sling Samples SVN repository . You should find most of what you need there.
Does anybody use different technologies like Guice and iPOJO together or is that just a crazy idea?
If you have frameworks which are configured with JSR 330 annotations it does make sense to configure them at runtime using Guice or Spring or whatever works for you. However, as Neil Bartlett has pointed out, this will not work cross-bundles.

I'd just like to add a little more information to Robert's excellent answer, particularly with regard to JSR330 and DS.
Declarative Services, Blueprint, iPOJO and the other OSGi "component models" are primarily intended for injecting OSGi services. These are slightly harder to handle than regular dependencies because they can come and go at any time, including in response to external events (e.g. network disconnected) or user actions (e.g. bundle removed). Therefore all these component models provide an additional lifecycle layer over pure dependency injection frameworks.
This is the main reason why the DS annotations are different from the JSR330 ones... the JSR330 ones don't provide enough semantics to deal with lifecycle. For example they say nothing about:
When should the dependency be injected?
What should we do when the dependency is not currently available (i.e., is it optional or mandatory)?
What should we do when a service we are using goes away?
Can we dynamically switch from one instance of a service to another?
etc...
Unfortunately because the component models are primarily focused on services -- that is, the linkages between bundles -- they are comparatively spartan with regard to wiring up dependencies inside the bundle (although Blueprint does offer some support for this).
There should be no problem using an existing DI framework for wiring up dependencies inside the bundle. For example I had a customer that used Guice to wire up the internal pieces of some Declarative Services components. However I tend to question the value of doing this, because if you need DI inside your bundle it suggests that your bundle may be too big and incoherent.
Note that it is very important NOT to use a traditional DI framework to wire up components between bundles. If the DI framework needs to access a class from another bundle then that other bundle must expose its implementation details, which breaks the encapsulation that we seek in OSGi.

I have some experience in building applications using Aries Blueprint. It has some very nice features regarding OSGi services and config admin support.
If you search for some great examples have a look at the code of Apache Karaf which uses blueprint for all of its wiring.
See http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/karaf/
I also have some tutortials for Blueprint and Apache Karaf on my website:
http://www.liquid-reality.de/display/liquid/Karaf+Tutorials
In your environment with the embedded felix it will be a bit different as you do not have the management features of Karaf but you simply need to install the same bundles and it should work nicely.

I can recommend Bnd and if you use Eclipse IDE sepcially Bndtools as well. With that you can avoid describing DS in XML and use annotations instead. There is a special Reference annotation for DI. This one has also a filter where you can reference only a special subset of services.

I am using osgi and DI for current my project, I've choosed gemini blueprint because it is second version of SPRING DYNAMIC MODULES, Based on this information I suggest you to read Spring Dynamic Modules in Action. This book will help you to understand some parts and points how to build architecture and why is it good :)

Running into a similar architecture problem here - as Robert mentioned above in his answer:
If you find yourself needing per-user work the simplest approach is to
have services which receive a JCR Session or a Sling ResourceResolver
and use those to perform the work you need. The results will be
automatically adjusted for the privileges of the current user without
any extra effort.
Extrapolating from this (and what I am currently coding), one approach would be to add #param resourceResolver to any #Service methods so that you can pass the appropriately request-scoped object to be used down the execution chain.
Specifically we've got a XXXXService / XXXXDao layer, called from XXXXServlet / XXXXViewHelper / JSP equivalents. So managing all of these components via the OSGI #Service annotations, we can easily wire up the entire stack.
The downside here is that you need to litter your interface design with ResourceResolver or Sessions params.
Originally we tried to inject ResourceResolverFactory into the DAO layer, so that we could easily access the session at will via the factory. However, we are interacting with the session at multiple points in the hierarchy, and multiple times per request. This resulted in session-closed exceptions.
Is there a way to get at that per-request ResourceResolver reliably without having to pass it into every service method?
With request-scoped injection on the Service layers, you could instead just pass the ResourceResolver as a constructor arg & use an instance variable instead. Of course the downside here is you'd have to think about request-scope vs. prototype-scope service code and separate out accordingly.
This seems like it would be a common problem where you want to separate out concerns into service/dao code, leaving the JCR interactions in the DAO, analogous to Hibernate how can you easily get at the per-request Session to perform repo operataions?

Arquillian and CDI

I'm reading the Arquillian Reference Guide which is very well written, however in the chapter that talks about setting up dependency injection I can't find where you actually specify the beans/bindings.
Most of the Arquillian CDI code examples show the use of Java's #Inject annotation. So I'm just wondering, where I define these beans/DI mappings/bindings, and how do I configure Arquillian to use them?
In Spring DI, you specify a bean descriptor, like spring-config.xml. In Guice you implement a Module and define its configure(Binder) method. What does this look like in Arquillian-land when using javax.inject.Inject? Thanks in advance.

The short answer - there is no need to define bean mappings in CDI, because CDI works with annotations exclusively. You can add extra information in config-files, but this is usually not required.
The long answer is best taken from this excellent introduction into CDI.

I think you need to use "Alternatives" CDI mechanism
Alternatives are beans whose implementation is specific to a particular client module or deployment scenario.

Runtime dependency injection with Spring

My current project is leveraging Spring, and our architect has decided to let Spring manage Services, Repositories and Factory objects, but NOT domain objects. We are closely following domain driven design. The reasoning behind not using spring for domain objects is primarily that spring only allows static dependency injection. What i mean by static dependency injection is that dependencies are specified inside xml configuration and they get "frozen".
I maybe wrong, but my current understanding is that even though my domain only leverages interfaces to communicate with objects, but spring's xml configuration forces me to specify a concrete dependency. hence all the concrete dependencies have to be resolved at deployment time. Sometimes, this is not feasible. Most of our usecases are based on injecting a particular type based on the runtime data or a message received from an end user.
Most of our design is following command pattern. hence, when we recieve a command, we would like to construct our domain model and based on data received from a command, we inject particular set of types into our aggregate root object. Hence, due to lack of spring's ability to construct a domain model based on runtime data, we are forced to use static factory methods, builders and Factory patterns.
Can someone please advise if spring has a problem to the above scenario ?
I could use AOP to inject dependencies, but then i am not leveraging spring's infrastructure.

I suggest you read the section in the Spring docs concerning Using AspectJ to dependency inject domain objects with Spring.
It's interesting that you said "I could use AOP to inject dependencies, but then i am not leveraging spring's infrastructure, " considering that AOP is a core part of Spring's infrastructure. The two go very well together.
The above link allows you to have Spring's AOP transparently inject dependencies into domain objects that are creating without direct reference to the Spring infrastructure (e.g. using the new operator). It's very clever, but does require some deep-level classloading tinkering.

Spring's dependency injection/configuration is only meant for configuring low-level technical infrastructure, such as data sources, transaction management, remoting, servlet mount-points and so forth.
You use spring to route between technical APIs and your services, and inside those services you just write normal Java code. Keeping Spring away from your domain model and service implementations is a good thing. For a start , you don't want to tie your application's business logic to one framework or let low-level technical issues "leak" into your application domain model. Java code is much easier to modify in the IDE than spring's XML config, so keeping business logic in java let's you deliver new features more rapidly and maintain the application more easily. Java is much more expressive than spring's XML format so you can more clearly model domain concepts if you stick to plain Java.

Spring's dependency injection (and dependency injection in general) is basically for wiring together Services, Repositories and Factories, etc. It's not supposed to directly handle things that need to be done dynamically in response to commands, etc., which includes most stuff with domain objects. Instead, it provides control over how those things are done by allowing you to wire in the objects you want to use to do them.