If the server running Oracle database reboots, this probably should invalidate all previous JDBC connections in the connection pool (running as part of application on another server).
Some connection pools can handle this, others require manual re-initialization, about Oracle I do not know. Would Oracle connection pool (versions 11g and up) be able to detect such situation and recover, or do I need to check for this myself and reinitialize?
Ideally, I would like to know also that would happen for the connection in use that has been borrowed from the pool. Would such connection proxy be able to use the rebooted server?
I have read http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B10501_01/java.920/a96654/connpoca.htm without particular success.
Related
I have a question related to the scenario when connecting from a Java application using the Microsoft JDBC Driver 4.0 to a SQL Server 2014 with AlwaysOn Availability Groups set up for high availability.
With this set up, we will be connecting to an availability group listener (specified in the db connecting string instead of any particular instance), so that the DB fail-over etc. is handled gracefully by the listener and it tries to connect to the next available instance behind the scenes if current primary goes down in the AG cluster.
Question(s) I have is,
In the data-source that is configured on the j2ee application server side (we use WebSphere), what happens to those connections already pooled by the data-source?
When a database goes down, though the AG listener would try to reconnect on the db side to the next available DB, will the AG Listener also through the jdbc driver send an event or something to the data-source created on the app server and make sure those connections that are already pooled by the datasource to be discarded and have it create new ones so that transactions on the application side wont fail (though they might for a while till new connections are created and fail over is successful) or the java application has to find out only after requesting it from the datasource?
WebSphere Application Server is able to cope with bad connections and removes them from the pool. Exactly when this happens depends on some configurable options and on how fully the Microsoft JDBC driver takes advantage of the javax.sql.ConnectionEventListener API to send notifications to the application server. In the ideal case where a JDBC driver sends the connectionErrorOccurred event immediately for all connections, WebSphere Application Server responds by removing all of these connections from the pool and by marking any connection that is currently in-use as bad so that it does not get returned to the pool once the application closes the handle. Lacking this, WebSphere Application Server will discover the first bad connection upon next use by the application. It is discovered either by a connectionErrorOcurred event that is sent by the JDBC driver at that time, or lacking that, upon inspecting the SQLState/error code of an exception for known indicators of bad connections. WebSphere Application Server then goes about purging bad connections from the pool according to the configured Purge Policy. There are 3 options:
Purge Policy of Entire Pool - all connections are removed from
the pool and in-use connections marked as bad so that they are not
pooled.
Purge Policy of Failing Connection Only - only the
specific connection upon which the error actually occurred is
removed from the pool or marked as bad and not returned to the pool
Purge Policy of Validate All Connections - all connections are
tested for validity (Connection.isValid API) and connections found
to be bad are removed from the pool or marked as bad and not
returned to the pool. Connections found to be valid remain in the
pool and continue to be used.
I'm not sure from your description if you are using WebSphere Application Server traditional or Liberty. If traditional, there is an additional option for pre-testing connections as they are handed out of the pool, but be aware that turning this on can have performance implications.
That said, the one thing to be aware of is that regardless of any of the above, your application will always need to be capable of handling the possibility of errors due to bad connections (even if the connection pool is cleared, connections can go bad while in use) and respond by requesting a new connection and retrying the operation in a new transaction.
Version 4 of that SQL Server JDBC driver is old and doesn't know anything about the always on feature.
Any data source connection pool can be configured to check the status of the connection from the pool prior to doling it out to the client. If the connection cannot be used the pool will create a new one. That's true of all vendors and versions. I believe that's the best you can do.
I have a project in which I used HikariCP for JDBC connection pooling. And HikariCP works just great for my needs. It also logs the stats of the pool like below.
2014-12-03 10:16:08 DEBUG HikariPool:559 - Before cleanup pool stats loginPool (total=8, inUse=0, avail=8, waiting=0)
2014-12-03 10:16:08 DEBUG HikariPool:559 - After cleanup pool stats loginPool (total=7, inUse=1, avail=7, waiting=0)
Just for experimental purposes I closed all the MySQL connections for the configured database using MySQL Workbench. But, still I see HikariCP logging the stats like before though there are no actual connections to the database. When there was a request for connection it immediately established the connections(initial 8), so everything works great.
So, my question is how does these connections are managed or implemented? I think the reason why HikariCP logs stats, as if there were connections, is because it has valid in memory references to connections, which are actually non existent(with database).
Is my understanding correct?
When you close the connections using MySQL Workbench, you are closing them on the server end. On the JDBC (client) side, the previously established connections will remain in existence until the client code attempts to use them. At that point, they will be found to be "broken"; i.e. the client will get exceptions when it tries to use them.
The client-side JDBC Connection objects only get closed or recycled when they are returned to the connection pool by your Java application code.
The connection pool created 8 connections at startup. You say you disconnected them using the workbench. Most connection pools won't know the connection is disconnected until it gets used.
Your assumption is correct. You manually killed the connections but the pool has a handle to 8 sockets which it assumes are connected. Given time your connection pool may have checked the connections for validity and attempted to reconnect them. I can't speak for HikariCP but this is what modern connections pools do.
I have code that connects to a SQL DB and queries it based on user input. I would like to connect using a Pool instead to speed up the query times. I attempted to write a Pool and Manager class but I am getting an unreported NamingException when I try to get a connection from the pool. I have also already caught NamingExceptions in my getConnection() function.
Does anyone know why I am getting this error?
Or could point me in the right direction to create a valid ConnectionPool?
You should use the latest JDBC driver, which supports connection pooling internal, so you don't have to write your own.
You have 3 options:
If your code runs in an application server, configure a connection pool in the server.
Some JDBC drivers provide a connection pool implementation (but many only provide a poolable data source that is meant for integration with an app server).
Use commons-dbcp or some equivalent library to create a connection pool.
I have a stand-alone Java windows application developed based on Swing. It connects to a MySQL database for data storage. In case the database connection fails, I am getting a link failure exception from the MySQL JDBC driver (MySQLNonTransientConnectionException). I don't want to re-instantiate my database connection object or the whole program in case such a link failure issue happens. I just want to tell the user to try again later without having to restart the entire application. If the user is asked to restart the entire application, that would probably give a negative impression on the quality of the program. What do you think would be the preferred way for a standard java application to fail-over after such a database link failure without having to re-instantiate all the communication objects? Thanks in advance.
Use a Connection Pool (such as C3PO or DBCP). Your application takes the Connections from the pool, executes the statement(s) and puts the Connection back into the pool. The pool can be configured to test the JDBC Connections. For example, if they become stale, they can be automatically reinstantiated by the pool.
If your application takes the Connection from the pool, it will be a valid Connection. Let the pool handle the management of valid/invalid/stale JDBC Connections.
How to handle database connection with multithreaded application. I have developed one application that created more thread. But when i run application it run correctly but after some time application is going to hang....?? what i have to do ..? How to handle Database connection with multithreaded application .?
You'll probably would like to use a connection pool. My recommendation is c3p0.
Database connections and threading need not be completely related.
Where are you fetching your DB connections from? Is it a central data source? Or a custom wrapper over JDBC connection? Or are you fetching it from a DB connection pool? Or are you creating a new connection in each thread?
Connection in the singular? If you only have one connection then you will have to synchronize your threads access to the connection. Better to use a Database connection pool though; almost all database vendors provide a connection pool implementation.