I dont understand how the different amounts are calculated [closed] - java

Closed. This question needs details or clarity. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Add details and clarify the problem by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I don't understand how the results are calculated
int halfDollar = remainingAmount / 50;
remainingAmount = remainingAmount % 50;
int numberOfQuarters = remainingAmount / 25;
remainingAmount = remainingAmount % 25;
ETC.....
import java.util.Scanner;
public class Program3
{
public static void main(String [] args)
{
Scanner kbd = new Scanner(System.in);
System.out.print("Please enter the total dollar amount in the piggy bank: $");
double amount = kbd.nextDouble();
int remainingAmount = (int)(amount * 100);
int halfDollar = remainingAmount / 50;
remainingAmount = remainingAmount % 50;
int numberOfQuarters = remainingAmount / 25;
remainingAmount = remainingAmount % 25;
int numberOfDimes = remainingAmount / 10;
remainingAmount = remainingAmount % 10;
int numberOfNickels = remainingAmount / 5;
remainingAmount = remainingAmount % 5;
int numberOfPennies = remainingAmount;
System.out.println(String.format("In $" + "%.2f", amount) + " worth of pennies there are:");
System.out.println(halfDollar + " half dollar(s), " + numberOfQuarters + " quarter(s), " + numberOfDimes + " dime(s), " + numberOfNickels + " nickle(s), and " + numberOfPennies + " cent(s).");
}
}

It's simple, you multiple the number of dollars by 100 and you get the number of cents, then you calculate how many nickels, dimes etc that would be.
For example, $5.26 is 526 cents, which is 10 half dollars ($5), 1 quarter, 1 penny.
Integer division gives you the number of times X is contained in Y, and modulus (%) gives you the remainder.
526 / 50 = 10
526 % 50 = 26
26 / 25 = 1
26 % 25 = 1
1 / 10 = 0
1 % 10 = 1
1 / 5 = 0
1 % 5 = 1
1 / 1 = 1
1 % 1 = 0
Obviously, what that does is break the amount of money in the least number of coins by giving you as many coins of the highest denomination first, then the highest number of coins of the next denomination etc.

For avoiding fractions you multiply value with 100. Making calculations with fractions is a little bit difficult.
For example instead of making calculations with $1.25 programmers prefer to make calculations 125. It makes to easy understanding.
If you divide(/) X to Y you find the number of Y that X contains.
If you take mod(%) X of Y you find the remainder of X divided by Y
Think that $1.43 entered.
1.43 * 100 = 143
143 / 50 = 2 -> Half dollar
143 % 50 = 43 -> remainder of division
43 / 25 = 1 -> Quarter
43 % 25 = 18 -> remainder of division
18 / 10 = 1 -> Dimes
18 % 10 = 8 -> remainder of division
8 / 5 = 1 -> Nickels
8 % 5 = 3 -> remainder of division
There is no more division last remainder is pennies and it is 3

The / operator when applied to ints provides integer division. That is: division where the fractional part is thrown away.
For example: 10 / 3 gives 3.
Since:
10 divided by 3 is 3.3333333 recurring.
Throwing away the fractional part (0.3333333 recurring) gives the result 3.
The % operator provides modulus or the remainder of integer division. That is: the numerator minus the greatest multiple of the denominator that is less than the numerator.
For example: 10 % 3 gives 1.
Since:
the numerator is 10
the denominator is 3
The result of the integer division 10 / 3 is 3 (as we worked out above)
The greatest multiple of the denominator (3) that is less than the numerator (10) is 3, since 3 * 3 is 9 and no multiple of 3 is greater than 9 but less than 10.
Subtracting that (9) from the numerator (10) you get 10 - 9 which is the result 1.
An easier way to understand this is that integer / is division of whole things that can't be split. So you might want to divide 10 marbles (which you don't want to split into pieces) evenly between 3 people. Then each person gets 3 marbles, but there is 1 marble left over.
Note: that the greatest multiple of the denominator is exactly the result of the integer division (3 in this case, as in 10 / 3 is 3)
Note: You could also work this out by multiplying the fractional part by the result of the integer division (which we worked out was 10 / 3 =3). Giving 0.33333... * 3 which is the result 1.

Related

Precedence in expression including parentheses and int cast in java [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
Int division: Why is the result of 1/3 == 0?
(19 answers)
Closed 3 years ago.
I have the following expression in my code
int n = ((int) Math.sqrt(4 * 4 + 5) - 1) / 2;
Can someone tell me the precedence in which the expression is evaluated?
Logically I would evaluate the expression in the following way:
4 * 4 + 5 = 16 + 5 = 21
Math.sqrt(21) ~ 4.58
4.58 - 1 = 3.58
(int) 3.58 = 3
3 / 2 = 1.5
However the code evaluates to 1.
You almost got it. The only difference (which doesn't matter for the result) is that the cast is evaluated
before the subtraction, and you're using integer division:
4 * 4 + 5 = 16 + 5 = 21
Math.sqrt(21) ~ 4.58
(int) 4.58 = 4 (cast first)
4 - 1 = 3
3 / 2 = 1 (integer division)
The order you suggest is correct.
The keypoint is the last operation: the result of an int divided by an int is an int as well.
To fix this, one of the two number should be a float (or a double):
float n = ((float)(int) (Math.sqrt(4 * 4 + 5) - 1)) / 2;
In this way you divide a float by an int, and the result will be a float.
Or better:
double n = (Math.sqrt(4 * 4 + 5) - 1) / 2;
Because the cast to int of Math.sqrt() isn't useful.
Please note that the first operation does exactly what you ask with the round of the Math.sqrt(), while the second one doesn't.

Get the consecutive numbers whose sum matches with given number

I was going through a simple program that takes a number and finds the number of occurrences of consecutive numbers that matches with given number.
For example:
if input is 15, then the consecutive numbers that sum upto 15 are:
1,2,3,4,5
4,5,6
7,8
So the answer is 3 as we have 3 possibilities here.
When I was looking for a solution I found out below answer:
static long process(long input) {
long count = 0;
for (long j = 2; j < input/ 2; j++) {
long temp = (j * (j + 1)) / 2;
if (temp > input) {
break;
}
if ((input- temp) % j == 0) {
count++;
}
}
return count;
}
I am not able to understand how this solves the requirement because this program is using some formula which I am not able to understand properly, below are my doubts:
The for loop starts from 2, what is the reason for this?
long temp = (j * (j + 1)) / 2; What does this logic indicates? How is this helpful to solving the problem?
if ((num - temp) % j == 0) Also what does this indicate?
Please help me in understanding this solution.
I will try to explain this as simple as possible.
If input is 15, then the consecutive numbers that sum upto 15 are:
{1,2,3,4,5} -> 5 numbers
{4,5,6} -> 3 numbers
{7,8} -> 2 numbers
At worst case, this must be less than the Sum of 1st n natural numbers = (n*(n+1) /2.
So for a number 15, there can never be a combination of 6 consecutive numbers summing up to 15 as the sum of 1st 6 numbers =21 which is greater than 15.
Calculate temp: This is (j*(j+1))/2.
Take an example. Let input = 15. Let j =2.
temp = 2*3/2 = 3; #Meaning 1+2 =3
For a 2-number pair, let the 2 terms be 'a+1' and 'a+2'.(Because we know that the numbers are consecutive.)
Now, according to the question, the sum must add up to the number.
This means 2a+3 =15;
And if (15-3) is divisible by 2, 'a' can be found. a=6 -> a+1=7 and a+2=8
Similarly, let a+1 ,a+2 and a+3
a + 1 + a + 2 + a + 3 = 15
3a + 6 = 15
(15-6) must be divisible by 3.
Finally, for 5 consecutive numbers a+1,a+2,a+3,a+4,a+5 , we have
5a + 15 = 15;
(15-15) must be divisible by 5.
So, the count will be changed for j =2,3 and 5 when the input is 15
If the loop were to start from 1, then we would be counting 1 number set too -> {15} which is not needed
To summarize:
1) The for loop starts from 2, what is the reason for this?
We are not worried about 1-number set here.
2) long temp = (j * (j + 1)) / 2; What does this logic indicates? How is this helpful to solving the problem?
This is because of the sum of 1st n natural numbers property as I have
explained the above by taking a+1 and a+2 as 2 consecutive
numbers.
3) if ((num - temp) % j == 0) Also what does this indicate?
This indicates the logic that the input subtracted from the sum of 1st
j natural numbers must be divisible by j.
We need to find all as and ns, that for given b the following is true:
a + (a + 1) + (a + 2) + ... (a + (n - 1)) = b
The left side is an arithmetic progression and can be written as:
(a + (n - 1) / 2) * n = b (*)
To find the limit value of n, we know, that a > 0, so:
(1 + (n - 1) / 2) * n = n(n + 1) / 2 <= b
n(n + 1) <= 2b
n^2 + n + 1/4 <= 2b + 1/4
(n + 1/2)^2 <= 2b + 1/4
n <= sqrt(2b + 1/4) - 1/2
Now we can rewrite (*) to get formula for a:
a = b / n - (n - 1) / 2
Example for b = 15 and n = 3:
15 / 3 - (3 - 1) / 2 = 4 => 4 + 5 + 6 = 15
And now the code:
double b = 15;
for (double n = 2; n <= Math.ceil(Math.sqrt(2 * b + .25) - .5); n++) {
double candidate = b / n - (n - 1) / 2;
if (candidate == (int) candidate) {
System.out.println("" + candidate + IntStream.range(1, (int) n).mapToObj(i -> " + " + (candidate + i)).reduce((s1, s2) -> s1 + s2).get() + " = " + b);
}
}
The result is:
7.0 + 8.0 = 15.0
4.0 + 5.0 + 6.0 = 15.0
1.0 + 2.0 + 3.0 + 4.0 + 5.0 = 15.0
We are looking for consecutive numbers that sum up to the given number.
It's quite obvious that there could be at most one series with a given length, so basically we are looking for those values witch could be the length of such a series.
variable 'j' is the tested length. It starts from 2 because the series must be at least 2 long.
variable 'temp' is the sum of a arithmetic progression from 1 to 'j'.
If there is a proper series then let X the first element. In this case 'input' = j*(X-1) + temp.
(So if temp> input then we finished)
At the last line it checks if there is an integer solution of the equation. If there is, then increase the counter, because there is a series with j element which is a solution.
Actually the solution is wrong, because it won't find solution if input = 3. (It will terminate immediately.) the cycle should be:
for(long j=2;;j++)
The other condition terminates the cycle faster anyway.
NB: loop is starting from 2 because=> (1*(1+1))/2 == 1, which doesn't make sense, i.e, it doesn't effect on the progress;
let, k = 21;
so loop will iterate upto (k/2) => 10 times;
temp = (j*(j+1))/2 => which is, 3 when j =2, 6 when j = 3, and so on (it calculates sum of N natural numbers)
temp > k => will break the loop because, we don't need to iterate the loop when we got 'sum' which is more than 'K'
((k-temp)%j) == 0 => it is basically true when the input subtracted from the sum of first j natural numbers are be divisible by j, if so then increment the count to get total numbers of such equation!
public static long process(long input) {
long count = 0, rest_of_sum;
for (long length = 2; length < input / 2; length++) {
long partial_sum = (length * (length + 1)) / 2;
if (partial_sum > input) {
break;
}
rest_of_sum = input - partial_sum
if (rest_of_sum % length == 0)
count++;
}
return count;
}
input - given input number here it is 15
length - consecutive numbers length this is at-least 2 at max input/2
partial_sum = sum of numbers from 1 to length (which is a*(a+1)/2 for 1 to a numbers) assume this is a partial sequence
rest_of_sum = indicates the balance left in input
if rest of sum is multiple of length meaning is that we can add (rest_of_sum/length) to our partial sequence
lets call (rest_of_sum/length) as k
this only means we can build a sequence here that sums up to our input number
starting with (k+1) , (k+2), ... (k+length)
this can validated now
(k+1) + (k+2) + ... (k+length)
we can reduce this as k+k+k+.. length times + (1+2+3..length)
can be reduced as => k* length + partial_sum
can be reduced as => input (since we verified this now)
So idea here is to increment count every-time we find a length which satisfies this case here
If you put this tweak in it may fix code. I have not extensively tested it. It's an odd one but it puts the code through an extra iteration to fix the early miscalculations. Even 1/20000 would work! Had this been done with floats that got rounded down and 1 added to them I think that would have worked too:
for (long j = 2; j < input+ (1/2); j++) {
In essence you need to only know one formula:
The sum of the numbers m..n (or m to n) (and where n>m in code)
This is ((n-m+1)*(n+m))/2
As I have commented already the code in the original question was bugged.
See here.
Trying feeding it 3. That has 1 occurrence of the consecutive numbers 1,2. It yields 0.
Or 5. That has 2,3 - should yield 1 too - gives 0.
Or 6. This has 1,2,3 - should yield 1 too - gives 0.
In your original code, temp or (j * (j + 1)) / 2 represented the sum of the numbers 1 to j.
1 2 3 4 5
5 4 3 2 1
=======
6 6 6 6 6 => (5 x 6) /2 => 30/2 => 15
As I have shown in the code below - use System.out.println(); to spew out debugging info.
If you want to perfect it make sure m and n's upper limits are half i, and i+1 respectively, rounding down if odd. e.g: (i=15 -> m=7 & n=8)
The code:
class Playground {
private static class CountRes {
String ranges;
long count;
CountRes(String ranges, long count) {
this.ranges = ranges;
this.count = count;
}
String getRanges() {
return this.ranges;
}
long getCount() {
return this.count;
}
}
static long sumMtoN(long m, long n) {
return ((n-m+1)* (n+m))/2;
}
static Playground.CountRes countConsecutiveSums(long i, boolean d) {
long count = 0;
StringBuilder res = new StringBuilder("[");
for (long m = 1; m< 10; m++) {
for (long n = m+1; n<=10; n++) {
long r = Playground.sumMtoN(m,n);
if (d) {
System.out.println(String.format("%d..%d %d",m,n, r));
}
if (i == r) {
count++;
StringBuilder s = new StringBuilder(String.format("[%d..%d], ",m,n));
res.append(s);
}
}
}
if (res.length() > 2) {
res = new StringBuilder(res.substring(0,res.length()-2));
}
res.append("]");
return new CountRes(res.toString(), count);
}
public static void main(String[ ] args) {
Playground.CountRes o = countConsecutiveSums(3, true);
for (long i=3; i<=15; i++) {
o = Playground.countConsecutiveSums(i,false);
System.out.println(String.format("i: %d Count: %d Instances: %s", i, o.getCount(), o.getRanges()));
}
}
}
You can try running it here
The output:
1..2 3
1..3 6
1..4 10
1..5 15
1..6 21
1..7 28
1..8 36
1..9 45
1..10 55
2..3 5
2..4 9
2..5 14
2..6 20
2..7 27
2..8 35
2..9 44
2..10 54
3..4 7
3..5 12
3..6 18
3..7 25
3..8 33
3..9 42
3..10 52
4..5 9
4..6 15
4..7 22
4..8 30
4..9 39
4..10 49
5..6 11
5..7 18
5..8 26
5..9 35
5..10 45
6..7 13
6..8 21
6..9 30
6..10 40
7..8 15
7..9 24
7..10 34
8..9 17
8..10 27
9..10 19
i: 3 Count: 1 Instances: [[1..2]]
i: 4 Count: 0 Instances: []
i: 5 Count: 1 Instances: [[2..3]]
i: 6 Count: 1 Instances: [[1..3]]
i: 7 Count: 1 Instances: [[3..4]]
i: 8 Count: 0 Instances: []
i: 9 Count: 2 Instances: [[2..4], [4..5]]
i: 10 Count: 1 Instances: [[1..4]]
i: 11 Count: 1 Instances: [[5..6]]
i: 12 Count: 1 Instances: [[3..5]]
i: 13 Count: 1 Instances: [[6..7]]
i: 14 Count: 1 Instances: [[2..5]]
i: 15 Count: 3 Instances: [[1..5], [4..6], [7..8]]

Averaging numbers in java with arrays not working [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
Division of integers in Java [duplicate]
(7 answers)
Closed 8 years ago.
I cannot seem to be able to get this code to properly average numbers. When i input 5 numbers that are 1 digit such as 9, 6, 2 etc. it gives me incorrect results, such as putting in five 2's, it will give me the answer '0.0'. Even when inputting numbers with two or more digits it rounds the number incorrectly. Its like its not even recognising it as being a double. I think i am missing something extremely obvious, haven't programmed in a while so wouldn't be surprised.
Here is the code:
import java.util.*;
public class LittleBoxes2
{
public static void main (String[] args)
{
Scanner input = new Scanner (System.in);
int[] num;
double avg;
String cont = "Y";
while(cont.equals("Y") || cont.equals("y"))
{
num = new int [5];
for(int i = 1; i <= 5; i++)
{
System.out.println("Enter number " + i + ".");
num[i - 1] = input.nextInt();
}
avg = num[0] / 5 + num[1] / 5 + num[2] / 5 + num[3] / 5 + num[4] / 5;
System.out.println("The average number is: " + avg + ".");
System.out.println("Do you want to continue? (Y/N)");
input.nextLine();
cont = input.nextLine();
}
}
}
When both operands of / are integers, the division is integer division. You have:
avg = num[0] / 5 + num[1] / 5 + num[2] / 5 + num[3] / 5 + num[4] / 5;
This means, for example, 8 / 5 evaluates to 1, and 2 / 5 evaluates to 0. For your five 2's example this evaluates to:
= 2 / 5 + 2 / 5 + 2 / 5 + 2 / 5 + 2 / 5
= 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0
= 0
You want, e.g.:
avg = num[0] / 5.0 + num[1] / 5.0 + num[2] / 5.0 + num[3] / 5.0 + num[4] / 5.0;
With that, one operand is a double, and so the num[n] integer operands are promoted to double, the division is floating-point division, and the result is a double.

Java Loop to go Through Numbers and Adding 5

I am writing Java code that needs to print these numbers: "0 5 10 3 8 1 6 11 4 9 2 7" in that order. I am new to Java, and am not very good at Loops yet. I am finding the points of a 12 point star, starting at 0, and trying to find the points that need to be touched by a line to make the star..
How do I do a loop that starts at 0, and adds 5 to each number.. so 0 + 5 = 5, 5+5=10, 10+5=3 (this is where my problem is.. How do I make it go back from 11 to 0?
I know this might seem confusing... or it might be extremely easy.. but any help would be greatly appreciated.
Increment by 5 until you pass 60, display the result of modulo 12. Something like,
for (int i = 0; i < 60; i += 5) {
System.out.println(i % 12);
}
This is called modulus, and java has the modulo operator % which gives the remainder of integer division.
15 / 12 == 1
15 % 12 == 3
as
(15 / 12) * 12 + (15 % 12) == 15
See the wikipedia.
Of course in your case you could also do
n += 5;
if (n >= 12) {
n -= 12;
}
instead of using modulo:
n = (n + 5) % 12;
Just iterate from 0 to 12, multiplying your number by 5, and applying modulus 12:
for (int i = 0; i < 12; i++) {
System.out.println(i * 5 % 12);
}
I believe the operator you are looking for is the modulus operator. The modulus gives you the remainder from a division problem. In this case you are using 12 as the denominator.
0 + 5 % 12 = 5 (0, remainder 5)
5 + 5 % 12 = 10 (0, remainder 10)
10 + 5 % 12 = 3 (1, remainder 3)
15 + 5 % 12 = 8 (1, remainder 8)
20 + 5 % 12 = 1 (2, remainder 1)
try this :
for(int i=0; ; i = (i+5)%12){
System.out.println(i);
if(i==7)break;
}

Division by subtration - dividing the remainder by subtration?

We can divide a number by subtraction and stop at the remainder as shown here.
But how do we continue to divide the remainder by subtraction ? I looked on google and could not find such answers. They don't go beyond the remainder.
For example, lets say we have
7/3.
7-3 = 4
4-3 = 1
So, we have 2 & (1/3). How do we do the 1/3
division using only subtraction or addition ?
REPEAT -
Please note that I dont want to use multiplication or division operators to do this.
You can get additional "digits", up to any arbitrary precision (in any base you desire, I'll use base 10 for simplicity but if you're trying to implement an algorithm you'll probably choose base 2)
1) Perform division as you've illustrated, giving you a quotient (Q=2), a divisor (D=3), and a remainder (R=1)
2) If R=0, you're done
3) Multiply R by your base (10, R now =10)
4) Perform division by subtraction again to find R/D (10/3 = 3+1/3).
5) Divide the resulting quotient by your base (3/10 = 0.3) and add this to what you got from step 1 (now your result is 2.3)
6) Repeat from step 2, dividing the new remainder (1) by 10 again
While it sounds an awful lot like I just said division quite a few times, we're dividing by your base. I used 10 for simplicity, but you'd really use base 2, so step 3 is really a left shift (by 1 bit every time) and step 5 is really a right shift (by 1 bit the first time through, 2 bits the second, and so on).
7/3.
7-3 = 4
4-3 = 1
7/3 = 2 R 1
1*10 = 10
10-3 = 7
7-3 = 4
4-3 = 1
10/3 = 3 R 1
7/3 = 2 + 3/10 R 1
7/3 = 2.3 R 1
1*10 = 10
10-3 = 7
7-3 = 4
4-3 = 1
10/3 = 3 R 1
7/3 = 2.3 + 3/100 R 1
7/3 = 2.33 R 1
And so on until you reach any arbitrary precision.
If you want to keep going to get decimal digits, multiply the remainder by a power of 10.
E.g. if you want 2.333, then you can multiply remainder by 1000, and then repeat the algorithm.
It depends on what you are asking.
If you are asking how to get the end fraction and simply it, let's take a different example.
26 / 6.
26 - 6 = 20 count 1
20 - 6 = 14 count 2
14 - 6 = 8 count 3
8 - 6 = 2 count 4
(In code, this would be accomplished with a for loop)
Afterwards, we would have 4 2/6. To simplify, switch the dividend and divisor:
6 / 2.
6 - 2 = 4 count 1
4 - 2 = 2 count 2
2 - 2 = 0 count 3
If this finishes without a remainder, show as 1 over the count.
In pseudo-code:
int a = 26;
int b = 6;
int tempb = 6;
int left = 26;
int count = 0;
int count2 = 0;
left = a - b;
for(count; left > b; count++){
left -= b;
}
if(left > 0){
for(count2; tempb > left; count2++){
tempb -= left;
}
console.log("The answer is " + count + " and 1/" + count2);
I hope this answers your question!
Here is a complete program that uses only + and -, translate to your language of choice:
module Q where
infixl 14 `÷` `×`
a × 0 = 0
a × 1 = a
a × n = a + a×(n-1)
data Fraction = F Int [Int]
a ÷ 0 = error "division by zero"
a ÷ 1 = F a []
0 ÷ n = F 0 []
a ÷ n
| a >= n = case (a-n) ÷ n of
F r xs -> F (r+1) xs
| otherwise = F 0 (decimals a n)
where
decimals a n = case (a × 10) ÷ n of
F d rest = (d:rest)
instance Show Fraction where
show (F n []) = show n
show (F n xs) = show n ++ "." ++ concatMap show (take 10 xs)
main _ = println (100 ÷ 3)
It is easy to extend this in such a way that the periodic part of the fraction is detected, if any. For this, the decimals should be tuples, where not only the fractional digit itself but also the dividend that gave rise to it is kept.
The printing function could then be adjusted to print infinite fractions like 5.1(43), where 43 would be the periodic part.

Categories