I have a requirement to convert XML to EDI. I have searched a lot for open source free libraries which full fill my need, but could not find any.
So I decided to write my own logic.
Below are my requirements for an application I am going to execute.
Input of the application is: XML data
Output of the application is: EDI (Electronic Data Interchange) representation of the XML data.
I have to apply some business rules on XML data and generate the EDI representation.
Here is my design for the requirement:
The Java POJOs, here onwards these are Source POJOs, to represent the xml data. To load xml data into Source POJOs, I am using JAXB.
The Java POJOs, here onwards these are Target POJOs, to represent the EDI model.
A Java class, here onwards it is XmlToEDIBuilder, to code the business rules
Finally I am using FreeMarker Template to get the desired EDI structure out of Target POJOs.
Is my design looks good? Any suggestions would really help me.
Recently I had a project involving edifact parsing and generation.
I used http://www.smooks.org/ framework for that purpose.
Using the framework mentioned above your application logic steps might be the following:
parse XML to POJO
use precompiled smooks components and your POJO to build your desired edifact version
Smooks components could be extended in case some custom and/or client specific edifact format needed.
Here is the usage example to get you started: https://github.com/lunatech-labs/smooks-examples/blob/master/edifact-in-code-manipulation/src/main/java/example/Main.java
Related
I'm trying to generate flat file for test data using JAVA. Flat file has own mapping document which describes all fields of each line.
I was suggested to use XSD for mapping and I did some research on XSD. As I understood that XSD is for only validation of XML. In this case I have to randomly generate XML file based on XSD and convert it to txt or other format. Because as an output I need flat file, not XML.
It seems like using XSD i'm adding extra steps in creating the file as first create XML, validate with XSD and convert it expected format.
What would be your recommendation in my situation for following the mapping document?
Thanks in advance.
I have seen your kind of setup before. The reasons may be different than your particular scenario, but nonetheless it made sense. One thing to consider has to do with the skills and tools people have available and so whatever makes the job done quick and well, goes.
You seem to describe an offset based, "flat" data structure. In my case, people used COBOL copybooks which are very good at describing this. IBM Rational Developer had a built-in wizard which allows the creation of Java Data Bindings from a COBOL copybook. This is to say that within a minute one gets a Java class which can create a record for your flat file in no time (it comes with all the logic required to do the padding, etc.)
To get the data generated, there are tools capable of generating XML files which cover all constraints defined by an XSD (e.g. alternate content i.e. xsd:choice, enumerated values, etc.) Now, assuming you have a proper XSD describing your logical model of your flat file, one can get 10s, 100s, even 100K XML generated from an XSD spec. It takes a click, plus the time spent by the tool to create those files.
Next, to get the XML files in your generated Java class, and so avoid going through XSLT or whatever (many shops don't have the skills) it may be as simple as writing Java mapping code between a JAXB generated class and the one created above, or if matching is possible, simply annotate the generated class to support JAXB unmarshalling. This last step may take longer to code, but it would be trivial code any Java developer would know how to do it.
This could possibly give you a view into why someone may have recommended Java and XSD for this task. XSD is a modeling language with built in support for constraints, which may prove helpful in generating test data through combinatorial techniques.
I am developing a java application and i am using XML to store the settings and other data in the application.I have read about Java preferences manager API but i felt storing in XML is more convenient in my application.I started usng JAXB first but then i dint find any tutorials to modify the XML once it is created.My application involves storing the Email account details of the users.As the user adds his accounts dynamically , i need to add them to XML as well.So i dint find JAXB convenient(or rather i dint find any tutorials to update or modify the XML ).The only other option i found was DOM parser here http://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/jaxp/dom/readingXML.html .But i feel it is too complicated for such a simple application.speed , memory etc doesnt matter to me.Are there any other alternatives to do this?
This can be a good (java-oriented) solution. Besides being Berkeley DB enables the development of custom data management solutions, without the overhead traditionally associated with such custom projects. yet based on XML files. It's has a very complete documentation for integration with Java lang.
With JAXB you can:
Unmarshal the XML into Java objects.
Manipulate the Java objects to modify the XML.
Marshal the objects producing a new XML document which you can use to replace the original XML.
Or:
Parse the XML into a DOM
Unmarshal the XML using a JAXB Binder
Modify the object
Use the Binder to apply the changes back to the DOM.
Write out the DOM replacing the original XML
I like to point you to XMLBeam (Disclosure: I'm affiliated with that project). This library is ideal to store configuration values in XML and while the application grows maintain the XML format without changing your Java API.
This is how IO operations look like:
Projection projection = projector.io().file(file).read(Projection.class);
projector.io().file(file).write(projection);
You get one liner IO handling and static typed access to the XML content. A pattern for configuration data would be to include a default value template in your JAR, read this if no config file was found on disk and write it back to disk on config changes. But of course you can also create documents from scratch (described in tutorials).
My application contains a set of model e.g. DocumentX2010, DocumentX2009, DocumentX2008...
Every year document changes persistance model.
More fields..
More details...
Some little difference...
Every year I need to change the database column...
For next version of my project I want to change the architecture drastically.
I want to store documents in XML format.
I search standard to design mi xml files:
some like CDA2 (The HL7 Clinical Document Architecture is an XML-based markup standard intended to specify the encoding, structure and semantics of clinical documents for exchange.)
How is best standard?
How is it best framework to mapping my java classes to the XML file?
How is it best way to persist XML file into DB?
Looking for a standard for your document design is like looking for a standard for your database data model: The design is entirely dependent on your domain and application, there is no external answer (unless you are using a shared established standard, which do publish xsd's, and I reckon this is not your case).
I'd say the best way to serialize a Java class to xml would be to convert it into a bean and use xmlencoder.
For persisting, you may check xml databases if you are feeling adventurous. Otherwise, you can convert your beans into entity beans and use JPA.
I am going to develop a database import/export feature in a Java EE application.
I plan to use XML-binding solution to convert between Java object and XML file which is import/export file.
Import feature: unmarshal the XML file to Java object in memory representation, then use JDBC to update the database.
Export feature: inverse the import process. retrieve the database to Java object and marshal the object to XML.
I think it can work fine, but it's not flexible enough. Because the XSD of XML is pre-defined, it's impossible to change XML schema and Java object definition at runtime. Say it's dynamic binding. Even I want the feature supports other file formats (You could forget it, if the format is too far at this stage).
What is your advice about the feature? Thanks!
I don't know whether this is correct answer, but if in any case it is helpful:
I have used Spring, Hibernate, JAXB where you can annotate your database entity class and its element with jaxb annotation and you are not required to write any xml schema files. In spring you can use jaxb Marshaller.
I think it should be possible in pure jaxb also, so u can look into jaxb annotation.
I think it can work fine, but it's not
flexible enough. Because the XSD of
XML is pre-defined, it's impossible to
change XML schema and Java object
definition at runtime
If you think it isn't flexible enough, go with a data interchange format which relieves you from all these fixed schema definitions (I know even JSON has a schema specification but you get the point). Is using JSON acceptable?
I would go as far to argue that if "importing to database" and "exporting from database" is the only requirement, you need not even create Java objects for this. Simply pass in a JSON string which contains the schema which would then be processed by a JSON processor which interfaces directly with your DAO layer. Similarly with the data read from the database. The downside is that "date" support in JSON is spotty at best.
Come to think of it, it need not be JSON. You can take a look at other data serialization formats like Apache Avro. But then again, if XML is your requirement which can't be changed, you can get around the "flexibility limitation" by not using a schema at all.
After all, XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve your problem, you're not using enough of it. :-)
I am looking at a set of parsers generated for Atom, XAL, Kml etc. seemingly using an automated technique with a XML pull based parser. The clue towards the automation is presence of "package.html" in all XML-to-Java mapped classes folders. I would like to produce a similar one for the rather large Collada 1.4 spec. My first attempt with Altova ran into small problems due the "enum" keyword. I am sure I can fix it in the next run with appropriate renaming. Khronos admit to not designing the 1.4 spec to being automated parser generation friendly.
The actual parsers i.e. XAL parser, Atom parser etc. implement the XMLEventParser interface. I would like to know if anybody has encountered/used this pattern. If so which tool can be used to map the XSD to a class set simply giving access to the data components of the nodes using getters and setters.
I'm not sure I understand your question, but it appears that you want to process XML formats like Atom and represent it in objects with getters/setters. This can easily be done with JAXB.
For an example see:
http://bdoughan.blogspot.com/2010/09/processing-atom-feeds-with-jaxb.html