We Keep Coding

Are constructors in Java static in nature or non-static in nature?

There is a similar question
Constructor is static or non static
But few answers tell that constructor is static and few tell that constructor is non-static. This is confusing. So can anyone please clarify whether constructor is static in nature or non-static in nature?

This is what Java Specification says about constructors, in §8.8.3. Constructor Modifiers:
Unlike methods, a constructor cannot be abstract, static, final, native, strictfp, or synchronized:
A constructor is not inherited, so there is no need to declare it final.
An abstract constructor could never be implemented.
A constructor is always invoked with respect to an object, so it makes no sense for a constructor to be static.
There is no practical need for a constructor to be synchronized, because it would lock the object under construction, which is normally not made available to other threads until all constructors for the object have completed their work.
The lack of native constructors is an arbitrary language design choice that makes it easy for an implementation of the Java Virtual Machine to verify that superclass constructors are always properly invoked during object creation.
The inability to declare a constructor as strictfp (in contrast to a method (§8.4.3)) is an intentional language design choice; it effectively ensures that a constructor is FP-strict if and only if its class is FP-strict (§15.4).

I'm not sure which answer got you confused. But in Java, constructors aren't static.
See the following example:
public class MyTest {
public static void main(String[] args) {
new Test(); // Prints reference within the constructor
new Test(); // The reference is different here
}
}
class Test {
public Test() {
System.out.println(this.toString());
}
}
As you can see, by calling constructor twice, you get two different references to the object. This means that context of the constructor is not static.
You may have factory methods in your class, which are static and create instances:
class Test {
// May be called like Test.create() and returns instance
public static Test create() {
return new Test();
}
But inside those methods, you'll still have to call class constructor. Which is, as I demonstrated earlier, is not static.

What is the actual use of the default constructor in java?

I have read in many sources and books that constructor is used to initialise the fields when an object is created. I have also read that JVM provides a default constructor if I don't mention one. What is the purpose of a constructor if it is not required to initialise the fields like the one I have mentioned below?
I also understand that a constructor without parameter is required as
it is necessary during object creation when an argument is not passed
(when programmer-defined constructors with parameters exists).
Is it necessary for JVM to provide a constructor which is actually not required?
public class test {
int a;
public test() {
//this constructor is useless
}
public static void main(String[] args)
{
test ob= new test();
System.out.println(ob.a);
//this prints 0 which means a constructor is not required in intialising `a`
}
}
A constructor like test() makes sense if the programmer defines it since there could be other constructors which takes argument.
But why is it necessary for JVM to provide one when no constructor is declared by the programmer?
I have already tested and proved that initialising a field doesn't require constructor.
Also what does the default constructor look like?

The problem is that while you know the default constructor doesn't do anything in this example, in future the constructor might do something even if you don't realise it is and you might not be able to re-compile everywhere the code is used reliably. So the safest, simplest thing to do is to always call a constructor which might change in the future and let the JIT optimise away the constructor if it doesn't actually do anything.
The byte code always calls a contructor, whether you provide one or not. When you compile code which uses the default constructor it cannot assume the constructor doesn't do anything useful as you can add something to it later to do something useful. e.g.
Say you change
public class Test {
int a;
// public Test() { //this constructor does nothing
}
to
public class Test {
int a;
final List<String> strings = new ArrayList<>();
// public Test() { //this constructor does something now.
}
or
public class ServerTest {
final List<String> strings = new ArrayList<>();
}
public class Test extends SuperTest {
int a;
// the default constructor has to call super();
}
The constructor now initialised the strings field. You can change this class without having to re-compile everywhere it is used and say, hey, my constructor now does something useful, you should call it now.

The reason the JVM adds a default constructor if you haven't provided one is down to inheritance. Say for example you have 3 classes (A, B & C) in which B extends A and C extends B. Now when you instantiate C it will call the constructor of C and also the constructors of B and A. If a constructor was missing in one or more of these classes then the instantiation would fail. So having the compiler automatically add a default constructor avoids error like this. You may not need to actually do any work in your constructor, but it's required for the JVM to instantiate the object.

The constructor(s) (both default and custom one(s)) is not only used to initialize the fields of an object but also to initialize the object itself even if it has no fields at all. Calling the constructor, JVM allocates memory for this object and creates its reference.

It is the compiler, and not JVM, who inserts a default constructor on absence.
A default constructor is needed because the constructor of the base class needs to be called from a constructor.
The default constructor looks like:
public Test() {
super();
}

Here while you are creating the object new test(),
here parenthesis states the default constructor of object test.After creating the object,if you didnot give any constructor the default constructor is constructed by jvm.so after construction of your object first call goes to your default constructor.

The default constructor is a no argument constructor called automatically by the compiler when you haven't defined any constructor. Anyway, a constructor as the one you defined, can be also called a default constructor.
It basically calls the superclass' constructor making use of the super() method.
So the default constructor called automatically would be something like:
public ClassName(){
super();
}

Java's Compiler creates a Default Constructor if no other constructor is defined for the class.
But why?
The compiler's job is to chain the Subclass's constructor to the Super Class(ultimately Object class). It's not the Compiler's work to give a default constructor to your class therefore Java is doing it for you.
To do the chaining, it first checks if there is any constructor in the class, if yes it will add super() to that constructor.
If there is no constructor idefined in the class in order for the compiler to do a proper chaining, Java adds a default constructor and a call to super() into it.
Why ?
Because every class is a subclass of an Object class (directly or indirectly), it will inherit an object class, to do so the said Object class must be fully initialised. This is done by the default constructor.

How does Java handle fields when upcasting? [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
Closed 10 years ago.
Possible Duplicate:
The concept of shadowing
I am confused about how the fields of classes are handled in Java during upcasting. For example:
class SuperClass
{
String myString = "String in SuperClass";
public void myMethod()
{
System.out.println("Method in SuperClass");
}
}
class SubClass extends SuperClass
{
String myString = "String in SubClass";
public void myMethod()
{
System.out.println("Method in SubClass");
}
}
class Question
{
public static void main(String[] args)
{
SuperClass test = new SubClass();
// object test is an instance of SubClass
// but I am telling the compiler to treat it as SuperClass
test.myMethod();
System.out.println(test.myString);
}
}
Output:
Method in SubClass
String in SuperClass //Why is "String in SubClass" not used?
When I create an object test it is an instance of SubClass class; however, I am telling the compiler to treat it as SuperClass. Everything is clear to me about methods work: I will only be able to use the methods of the SubClass, if a given method is defined for SuperClass.
However, I am lost as to why a field of a SuperClass is used when I try to access myString of test. Since test is an instance of SubClass I would expect myString defined in SubClass to be used, why is this not happening? What am I missing?
I know that I can access, myString of SubClass by using this operator. For example, I could define printMyString method in SuperClass, and overwrite it with
public void printMyString()
{
System.out.println(this.myString);
}
In the SubClass, so my question is mostly about how come the field of the SuperClass is used in test. Maybe I am missing something obvious?
I tried to search for the answer, and the closest topic I found was Upcasting in Java and two separate object properties, though helpful, it did not answer my question.
Thank You in Advance

Attributes cant be overloaded like methods.
test.myMethod();
Here method invocation depends on the type of actual object. Here object is of type SubClass so method of SubClass is invoked.
test.myString
While accessing attributes,it depends on the type of reference variable. Here reference variable ie test is of type SuperClass so attribute from SuperClass is accessed.
What you are looking is class variable hiding / shadowing.

Fields in Java are only hidden and not actually overridden (that doesn't mean that we'll get a compile time error while trying this, instead they are not overridden in its true sense).
Overriding means the member should be invoked based on the run time
type of the object and not based on the declared type.
But binding for fields in Java is always static and hence it's based on the declared type of the object reference only.
In the example you've given, by declaring the class variable with the name 'myString' in class SubClass you hide the class variable it would have inherited from its superclass SuperClass with the same name 'myString'.
Java language specification :
If the class declares a field with a certain name, then the
declaration of that field is said to hide any and all accessible
declarations of fields with the same name in superclasses, and
superinterfaces of the class.
A hidden field can be accessed by using a qualified name if it is static, or by using a field access expression that contains the keyword super or a cast to a superclass type.

Constructor is static or non static

As per standard book constructor is a special type of function which is used to initialize objects.As constructor is defined as a function and inside class function can have only two type either static or non static.My doubt is what constructor is ?
1.)As constructor is called without object so it must be static
Test test =new Test();//Test() is being called without object
so must be static
My doubt is if constructor is static method then how can we frequently used this inside
constructor
Test(){
System.out.println(this);
}
Does the output Test#12aw212 mean constructors are non-static?

Your second example hits the spot. this reference is available in the constructor, which means constructor is executed against some object - the one that is currently being created.
In principle when you create a new object (by using new operator), JVM will allocate some memory for it and then call a constructor on that newly created object. Also JVM makes sure that no other method is called before the constructor (that's what makes it special).
Actually, on machine level, constructor is a function with one special, implicit this parameter. This special parameter (passed by the runtime) makes the difference between object and static methods. In other words:
foo.bar(42);
is translated to:
bar(foo, 42);
where first parameter is named this. On the other hand static methods are called as-is:
Foo.bar(42);
translates to:
bar(42);
Foo here is just a namespace existing barely in the source code.

Constructors are non-static. Every method first parameter is implicit this (except static) and constructor is one of that.

Constructors are NOT static functions. When you do Test test =new Test(); a new Test object is created and then the constructor is called on that object (I mean this points to the newly created object).

The new keyword here is the trick. You're correct in noting that in general, if you're calling it without an object, a method is static. However in this special case (i.e., preceded by the new keyword) the compiler knows to call the constructor.

The new operator returns a reference to the object it created.
new Test(); // creates an instance.
The System.out.println(this); is called after the new operator has instantiated the object

Not static. Read about constructors http://www.javaworld.com/jw-10-2000/jw-1013-constructors.html.

Neither.
Methods can be divided into 2 types: static/non-static methods, aka class/instance methods.
But constructors are not methods.

When we talk about static class then it comes to our mind that methods are called with class name,But in case of constructor ,Constructor is initialized when object is created So this proves to be non-static.

Constructors are neither static (as called using class name) or non-static as executed while creating an object.

Static:
Temp t= new Temp();
The new operator creates memory in the heap area and passes it to the constructor as Temp(this) implicitly. It then initializes a non-static instance variable defined in a class called this to the local parameter variable this.
Below example is just for understanding the concept, if someone tries to compile it, it will give the compile-time error.
class Temp{
int a;
Temp this; //inserted by compiler.
Temp(Temp this){ //passed by compiler
this.this=this; // initialise this instance variable here.
this.a=10;//when we write only a=10; and all the non-static member access by this implicitly.
return this; // so that we can't return any value from constructor.
}
}
Constructor is static because:
It is helping to create object.
It is called without object.

Constructor is used to initialize the object and has the behavior of non-static methods,as non-static methods belong to objects so as constructor also and its invoked by the JVM to initialize the objects with the reference of object,created by new operator

What is "static"?

I'm beginning to program in Java.
public static void main(String[]args)
A book said that I should use static in this case, but doesn't clearly say why I should or what it means.
Could you clarify this?

The concept of static has to do with whether something is part of a class or an object (instance).
In the case of the main method which is declared as static, it says that the main method is an class method -- a method that is part of a class, not part of an object. This means that another class could call a class method of another class, by referring to the ClassName.method. For example, invoking the run method of MyClass would be accomplished by:
MyClass.main(new String[]{"parameter1", "parameter2"});
On the other hand, a method or field without the static modifier means that it is part of an object (or also called "instance") and not a part of a class. It is referred to by the name of the specific object to which the method or field belongs to, rather than the class name:
MyClass c1 = new MyClass();
c1.getInfo() // "getInfo" is an instance method of the object "c1"
As each instance could have different values, the values of a method or field with the same name in different objects don't necessarily have to be the same:
MyClass c1 = getAnotherInstance();
MyClass c2 = getAnotherInstance();
c1.value // The field "value" for "c1" contains 10.
c2.value // The field "value" for "c2" contains 12.
// Because "c1" and "c2" are different instances, and
// "value" is an instance field, they can contain different
// values.
Combining the two concepts of instance and class variables. Let's say we declare a new class which contains both instance and class variables and methods:
class AnotherClass {
private int instanceVariable;
private static int classVariable = 42;
public int getInstanceVariable() {
return instanceVariable;
}
public static int getClassVariable() {
return classVariable;
}
public AnotherClass(int i) {
instanceVariable = i;
}
}
The above class has an instance variable instanceVariable, and a class variable classVariable which is declared with a static modifier. Similarly, there is a instance and class method to retrieve the values.
The constructor for the instance takes a value to assign to the instance variable as the argument. The class variable is initialized to be 42 and never changed.
Let's actually use the above class and see what happens:
AnotherClass ac1 = new AnotherClass(10);
ac1.getInstanceVariable(); // Returns "10"
AnotherClass.getClassVariable(); // Returns "42"
Notice the different ways the class and instance methods are called. The way they refer to the class by the name AnotherClass, or the instance by the name ac1. Let's go further and see the behavioral differences of the methods:
AnotherClass ac1 = new AnotherClass(10);
AnotherClass ac2 = new AnotherClass(20);
ac1.getInstanceVariable(); // Returns "10"
AnotherClass.getClassVariable(); // Returns "42"
ac2.getInstanceVariable(); // Returns "20"
AnotherClass.getClassVariable(); // Returns "42"
As can be seen, an instance variable is one that is held by an object (or "instance"), therefore unique to that particular instance, which in this example is the objects referred to by ac1 and ac2.
A class variable on the other hand is only unique to that entire class. To get this point across even better, let's add a new method to the AnotherClass:
public int getClassVariableFromInstance() {
return classVariable;
}
Then, run the following:
AnotherClass ac1 = new AnotherClass(10);
AnotherClass ac2 = new AnotherClass(20);
ac1.getInstanceVariable(); // Returns "10"
ac1.getClassVariableFromInstance(); // Returns "42"
ac2.getInstanceVariable(); // Returns "20"
ac2.getClassVariableFromInstance(); // Returns "42"
Although getClassVariableFromInstance is an instance method, as can be seen by being invoked by referring to the instances ac1 and ac2, they both return the same value, 42. This is because in both instance methods, they refer to the class method classVariable which is unique to the class, not to the instance -- there is only a single copy of classVariable for the class AnotherClass.
I hope that some what clarifies what the static modifier is used for.
The Java Tutorials from Sun has a section called Understanding Instance and Class Members, which also goes into the two types of variables and methods.

Please see a nice description on Wikipedia
For example, notice how in the Math class, you can say things like
Math.Abs(x);
without having to say
Math m = new Math();
These are static methods since you don't need an instance. Instance methods are those methods that require you to have an instance of a class.
Employee e = new Employee();
e.Terminate();

A static method is one that applies to the class a whole, not any particular member. .goExtinct() would be a method of the Duck population as a whole, not any particular duck. main is public and static because is has to always be available, and its not part of any particular class.

Usually, you have to have an object, an instance of a class, in order to call methods on it, for at least two reasons:
It depends on the object which class implements the method that is being called. For example if you have an instance of a subclass, the method in the subclass will be called instead, even though the code that calls the method is the same.
Objects usually have internal state (fields), that methods can refer to. This does not work if there is no object instance.
You create object instances by calling the class' constructor:
MyObject a = new MyObject();
Static methods are methods that are not attached to object instances. They can be called by just naming the class. As a result of this they
cannot be dynamically dispatched to subclasses (which is why you get a warning when you try to call it on object instances, that is just confusing syntax)
they cannot refer to instance state (non-static fields and other non-static methods).
Many people consider static methods a bad design pattern, and advise to not use them (except for public static void main) Look up the singleton instance pattern for an alternative.

In this particular case the main method must be static, because of the way the JVM will start loading classes and creating objects. When you start a Java program the JVM will look for the definition of the class that was passed to it and load it. So java MyClass will result in loading the definition of the MyClass class.
By definition a Java program will start executing in the main() method of the class that was passed to the JVM as the class to load initially. At this point in time no instance (object) of type MyClass has been created, so the main method has to be static to allow the start of the execution of your program.
If you want to see which classes are being loaded during the execution of a Java program you can use the -verbose:class command line option.

In any object oriented programming language like Java or C++ you create classes which at the very basic level are like BluePrints of a building. You can look at a blueprint and determine how various components are connected but you cannot actually live in it. It's the same with classes and object. Classes are blueprint and you create an instance of a class which is called an Object. For the same blueprint you can have multiple buildings , same way for one class you can have multiple objects. An Object is an instance of a class. Each method in a class can be called on an Object or an instance of a class, whereas for calling static methods you actually don't need an instance, you can directly call ClassName.method() without actually creating an instance of a class.

There will be times when you will want to define a class member that will be used independently of any object of that class. Normally a class member must be accessed only in conjunction with an object of its class. However, it is possible to create a member that can be used by itself, without reference to a specific instance. To create such a member, precede its declaration with the keyword static. When a member is declared static, it can be accessed before any objects of its class are created, and without reference to any object. You can declare both methods and variables to be static. The most common example of a static member is main( ). main( ) is declared as static
because it must be called before any objects exist.
The two types of static members are static fields and static methods:
Static field:
A field that’s declared with the static keyword, like this:
private static int ballCount:
The position of the static keyword is interchangeable with the positions of the visibility keywords (private and public, as well as protected). As a result, the following statement works, too:
static private int ballCount;
As a convention, most programmers tend to put the visibility keyword first.
The value of a static field is the same across all instances of the class. In other words, if a class has a static field named CompanyName, all objects created from the class will have the same value for CompanyName.
Static fields are created and initialized when the class is first loaded. That happens when a static member of the class is referred to or when an instance of the class is created, whichever comes first.
Static method:
A method declared with the static keyword. Like static fields, static methods are associated with the class itself, not with any particular object created from the class. As a result, you don’t have to create an object from a class before you can use static methods defined by the class.
The best-known static method is main, which is called by the Java runtime to start an application. The main method must be static, which means that applications run in a static context by default.
One of the basic rules of working with static methods is that you can’t access a nonstatic method or field from a static method because the static method doesn’t have an instance of the class to use to reference instance methods or fields.