We Keep Coding

ConcurrentModificationException When removing element using list iterator java

I have an issue removing the 1st and 2nd element of my list even by using the iterator.
I have read the following threads but can't fix my issue (those were the most relevant but I checked other material as well):
ConcurrentModificationException when trying remove element from list
Iterating through a Collection, avoiding ConcurrentModificationException when removing objects in a loop
So my code looks like this:
List<List<String>> list = cnf.read();
List<List<String>> nlist = new ArrayList<>();
for (List<String> l : list) {
if (l.size() <= 3) {
nlist.add(l);
} else {
int size = l.size();
while (size > 3) {
List<String> three = l.subList(0, 2);
three.add("Y" + (count++));
//Iterator itr = l.iterator();
ListIterator itr = l.listIterator();
int v = 0;
while (itr.hasNext()) {
itr.next();
if (v == 0 || v == 1) {
itr.remove();
v++;
}
}
l.add(0, "Y" + (count++));
size--;
nlist.add(three);
}
nlist.add(l);
}
}
for (List<String> l : nlist) {
System.out.println(l.toString());
System.out.println(l.size());
}
I get a ConcurrentModificationException at the print statement here :
System.out.println(l.toString());
I tried using iterators for my 2 for loops as well but It doesn't seem to make a difference!
I am new to posting questions so let me know If I am doing it right!
Thank you.

After A long debugging, here is the solution.
The sublist function passes by reference and not by value, a sublist created by ArrayList.subList call keeps a reference to the original list and accesses its elementData array directly.
For this reason, when adding an element to the "three" list, we alter the state of the original list. this happens here:
three.add("Y" + (count++));
A way of fixing it for this specific case is to create and initialize the "three" list the following way:
String one = l.get(0);
String two = l.get(1);
List<String> three = new ArrayList<>();
three.add(one);
three.add(two);
three.add("Y" + (count));
This allows us to manipulate our lists without getting Concurrency Exceptions (ConcurrentModificationException). However, if you are manipulating big lists, I would suggest you use another less hardcoded method for list creation.
I will mark this thread as answered and hope it helps people.

Iterating over unique pairs in a HashSet (Java)

I want to iterate over unique pairs in a HashSet, Ideally, I'd be able to make a copy of the iterator and when it has exhausted itself, iterate the iterator I am making copies of, but Iterators do not like being copied, and I suspect that there is a good reason for this, but I do not know what that is.
More specifically, what prevents this (below) behavior from being supported?
Iterator<Object> iter = myhash.iterator();
while(iter.hasNext()){
object=iter.next();
Iterator<Object> iterclone = iter.clone();
while(iterclone.hasNext()){
setOfObjectPairs.add(object,iterclone.next());
}
}
Edit: The point of doing this is to save the current state of the iterator, which is already pointing at the i-th element.

If you cloned an Iterator and the clone modified the underlying Iterable, the original Iterator will throw a ConcurrentModificationException.
You can simply use another iterator for the same set.
Iterator<Object> iter = h.iterator();
while(iter.hasNext()){
Object o=iter.next();
Iterator<Object> iterclone = h.iterator();
while(iterclone.hasNext()){
//logic
}
}
or you can use and array and iterate over it.

If the order to generate the pairs doesn't matter, then you could use the following code, which avoids having to clone the iterator, while still running in O(n*n) time:
HashSet<Integer> set = new HashSet<Integer>();
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
set.add(i);
}
int to = 0;
for (int a : set) {
int index = 0;
for (int b : set) {
if (index++ >= to) {
break;
}
System.out.println(a + ", " + b);
}
to++;
}

If you will not change iterator (you're only want to save state)
The best way is to do it here is with for each loop I guess
I expect iterators to be only for cases when I modify collection in loop through this collection. For example remove() method from this iterator.
The best way I see it is:
HashSet<Integer> set = new HashSet<Integer>();
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
set.add(i);
}
LinkedList<Integer> arr = new LinkedList<Integer>(set);
for (Integer i : set) {
arr.pollFirst();
for (Integer k : arr) {
System.out.println(i + " " + k);
}
}
Here you're coping you're hashset to LinkedList and you're droping first element from LinkedList every time you're iterating through hashset
Cloning anything in Java is not good practice. See for example Clone() vs Copy constructor- which is recommended in java

How to remove items from generic arraylist in Android (Java)

I have a generic arraylist of an object here I want to remove certain elements, The problem is when I iterate the list with for loop, I can't do a simple sequence of remove()'s because the elements are shifted after each removal.
Thanks

Use Iterator to remove element
Like
Iterator itr = list.iterator();
String strElement = "";
while (itr.hasNext()) {
strElement = (String) itr.next();
if (strElement.equals("2")) {
itr.remove();
}
}
See here

You can iterate the list this way ...
public void clean(List<Kopek> kopeks) {
for(Kopek kopek : kopeks) {
if (kopek.isDirty())
kopeks.remove(kopek);
}
}
Which is equiv to ...
public void clean1(List<Kopek> kopeks) {
Iterator<Kopek> kopekIter = kopeks.iterator();
while (kopekIter.hasNext()) {
Kopek kopek = kopekIter.next();
if (kopek.isDirty())
kopeks.remove(kopek);
}
}
Don't do this ... (due to the reason you have already observed.)
public void clean(List<Kopek> kopeks) {
for(int i=0; i<kopeks.size(); i++) {
Kopek kopek = kopeks.get(i);
if (kopek.isDirty())
kopeks.remove(i);
}
}
However, I believe removal by index rather than by object is more efficient. Removal by object is not efficient because the list is in most cases not a hashed list.
kopeks.remove(kopek);
vs
kopeks.remove(i);
To achieve positional remove, by treating a moving target appropriately ...
public void clean(List<Kopek> kopeks) {
int i=0;
while(i<kopeks.size()) {
Kopek kopek = kopeks.get(i);
if (kopek.isDirty()) // no need to increment.
kopeks.remove(i);
else
i++;
}
}

If you have the objects that you want to remove from your ArrayList<T> you can use :
mArrayList.remove(object);
or you can use an Iterator to remove your objects:
while(iterator.hasNext()){
if(iterator.next() == some condition for removal){
iterator.remove();
}
}

You could iterate backwards and remove as you go through the ArrayList. This has the advantage of subsequent elements not needing to shift and is easier to program than moving forwards.
List<String> arr = new ArrayList<String>();
ListIterator<String> li = arr.listIterator(arr.size());
// Iterate in reverse.
while(li.hasPrevious()) {
String str=li.previous();
if(str.equals("A"))
{
li.remove();
}
}

Create a separate ArrayList of Index of the data to be removed from the original ArrayList, then remove those elements by looping over it with for loop.
ArrayList<Myobj> arr = new ArrayList<Myobj>();
for (Myobj o : arr){
arr.remove(arr.indexOf(o));
}

without using iterators also solves the issue.. All i wanted to do is get the index which are to be deleted and sort it in decending order then remove it from the list.
check the code below
Arraylist<obj> addlist = getlist();
List<Integer> indices = new ArrayList<Integer>();
for(int i=0; i<addlist.size() ;i++){
if(addlist.get(i).getDelete()){
indices.add(i);
}
}
Collections.sort(indices, Collections.reverseOrder());
for (int i : indices)
addlist.remove(i);

How to avoid java.util.ConcurrentModificationException when iterating through and removing elements from an ArrayList

I have an ArrayList that I want to iterate over. While iterating over it I have to remove elements at the same time. Obviously this throws a java.util.ConcurrentModificationException.
What is the best practice to handle this problem? Should I clone the list first?
I remove the elements not in the loop itself but another part of the code.
My code looks like this:
public class Test() {
private ArrayList<A> abc = new ArrayList<A>();
public void doStuff() {
for (A a : abc)
a.doSomething();
}
public void removeA(A a) {
abc.remove(a);
}
}
a.doSomething might call Test.removeA();

Two options:
Create a list of values you wish to remove, adding to that list within the loop, then call originalList.removeAll(valuesToRemove) at the end
Use the remove() method on the iterator itself. Note that this means you can't use the enhanced for loop.
As an example of the second option, removing any strings with a length greater than 5 from a list:
List<String> list = new ArrayList<String>();
...
for (Iterator<String> iterator = list.iterator(); iterator.hasNext(); ) {
String value = iterator.next();
if (value.length() > 5) {
iterator.remove();
}
}

From the JavaDocs of the ArrayList
The iterators returned by this class's iterator and listIterator
methods are fail-fast: if the list is structurally modified at any
time after the iterator is created, in any way except through the
iterator's own remove or add methods, the iterator will throw a
ConcurrentModificationException.

You are trying to remove value from list in advanced "for loop", which is not possible, even if you apply any trick (which you did in your code).
Better way is to code iterator level as other advised here.
I wonder how people have not suggested traditional for loop approach.
for( int i = 0; i < lStringList.size(); i++ )
{
String lValue = lStringList.get( i );
if(lValue.equals("_Not_Required"))
{
lStringList.remove(lValue);
i--;
}
}
This works as well.

In Java 8 you can use the Collection Interface and do this by calling the removeIf method:
yourList.removeIf((A a) -> a.value == 2);
More information can be found here

You should really just iterate back the array in the traditional way
Every time you remove an element from the list, the elements after will be push forward. As long as you don't change elements other than the iterating one, the following code should work.
public class Test(){
private ArrayList<A> abc = new ArrayList<A>();
public void doStuff(){
for(int i = (abc.size() - 1); i >= 0; i--)
abc.get(i).doSomething();
}
public void removeA(A a){
abc.remove(a);
}
}

While iterating the list, if you want to remove the element is possible. Let see below my examples,
ArrayList<String> names = new ArrayList<String>();
names.add("abc");
names.add("def");
names.add("ghi");
names.add("xyz");
I have the above names of Array list. And i want to remove the "def" name from the above list,
for(String name : names){
if(name.equals("def")){
names.remove("def");
}
}
The above code throws the ConcurrentModificationException exception because you are modifying the list while iterating.
So, to remove the "def" name from Arraylist by doing this way,
Iterator<String> itr = names.iterator();
while(itr.hasNext()){
String name = itr.next();
if(name.equals("def")){
itr.remove();
}
}
The above code, through iterator we can remove the "def" name from the Arraylist and try to print the array, you would be see the below output.
Output : [abc, ghi, xyz]

Do the loop in the normal way, the java.util.ConcurrentModificationException is an error related to the elements that are accessed.
So try:
for(int i = 0; i < list.size(); i++){
lista.get(i).action();
}

Here is an example where I use a different list to add the objects for removal, then afterwards I use stream.foreach to remove elements from original list :
private ObservableList<CustomerTableEntry> customersTableViewItems = FXCollections.observableArrayList();
...
private void removeOutdatedRowsElementsFromCustomerView()
{
ObjectProperty<TimeStamp> currentTimestamp = new SimpleObjectProperty<>(TimeStamp.getCurrentTime());
long diff;
long diffSeconds;
List<Object> objectsToRemove = new ArrayList<>();
for(CustomerTableEntry item: customersTableViewItems) {
diff = currentTimestamp.getValue().getTime() - item.timestamp.getValue().getTime();
diffSeconds = diff / 1000 % 60;
if(diffSeconds > 10) {
// Element has been idle for too long, meaning no communication, hence remove it
System.out.printf("- Idle element [%s] - will be removed\n", item.getUserName());
objectsToRemove.add(item);
}
}
objectsToRemove.stream().forEach(o -> customersTableViewItems.remove(o));
}

One option is to modify the removeA method to this -
public void removeA(A a,Iterator<A> iterator) {
iterator.remove(a);
}
But this would mean your doSomething() should be able to pass the iterator to the remove method. Not a very good idea.
Can you do this in two step approach :
In the first loop when you iterate over the list , instead of removing the selected elements , mark them as to be deleted. For this , you may simply copy these elements ( shallow copy ) into another List.
Then , once your iteration is done , simply do a removeAll from the first list all elements in the second list.

In my case, the accepted answer is not working, It stops Exception but it causes some inconsistency in my List. The following solution is perfectly working for me.
List<String> list = new ArrayList<>();
List<String> itemsToRemove = new ArrayList<>();
for (String value: list) {
if (value.length() > 5) { // your condition
itemsToRemove.add(value);
}
}
list.removeAll(itemsToRemove);
In this code, I have added the items to remove, in another list and then used list.removeAll method to remove all required items.

Instead of using For each loop, use normal for loop. for example,the below code removes all the element in the array list without giving java.util.ConcurrentModificationException. You can modify the condition in the loop according to your use case.
for(int i=0; i<abc.size(); i++) {
e.remove(i);
}

Sometimes old school is best. Just go for a simple for loop but make sure you start at the end of the list otherwise as you remove items you will get out of sync with your index.
List<String> list = new ArrayList<>();
for (int i = list.size() - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
if ("removeMe".equals(list.get(i))) {
list.remove(i);
}
}

You can also use CopyOnWriteArrayList instead of an ArrayList. This is the latest recommended approach by from JDK 1.5 onwards.

Do somehting simple like this:
for (Object object: (ArrayList<String>) list.clone()) {
list.remove(object);
}

An alternative Java 8 solution using stream:
theList = theList.stream()
.filter(element -> !shouldBeRemoved(element))
.collect(Collectors.toList());
In Java 7 you can use Guava instead:
theList = FluentIterable.from(theList)
.filter(new Predicate<String>() {
#Override
public boolean apply(String element) {
return !shouldBeRemoved(element);
}
})
.toImmutableList();
Note, that the Guava example results in an immutable list which may or may not be what you want.

for (A a : new ArrayList<>(abc)) {
a.doSomething();
abc.remove(a);
}

"Should I clone the list first?"
That will be the easiest solution, remove from the clone, and copy the clone back after removal.
An example from my rummikub game:
SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
public void removeStones() {
ArrayList<Stone> clone = (ArrayList<Stone>) stones.clone();
// remove the stones moved to the table
for (Stone stone : stones) {
if (stone.isOnTable()) {
clone.remove(stone);
}
}
stones = (ArrayList<Stone>) clone.clone();
sortStones();
}

I arrive late I know but I answer this because I think this solution is simple and elegant:
List<String> listFixed = new ArrayList<String>();
List<String> dynamicList = new ArrayList<String>();
public void fillingList() {
listFixed.add("Andrea");
listFixed.add("Susana");
listFixed.add("Oscar");
listFixed.add("Valeria");
listFixed.add("Kathy");
listFixed.add("Laura");
listFixed.add("Ana");
listFixed.add("Becker");
listFixed.add("Abraham");
dynamicList.addAll(listFixed);
}
public void updatingListFixed() {
for (String newList : dynamicList) {
if (!listFixed.contains(newList)) {
listFixed.add(newList);
}
}
//this is for add elements if you want eraser also
String removeRegister="";
for (String fixedList : listFixed) {
if (!dynamicList.contains(fixedList)) {
removeResgister = fixedList;
}
}
fixedList.remove(removeRegister);
}
All this is for updating from one list to other and you can make all from just one list
and in method updating you check both list and can eraser or add elements betwen list.
This means both list always it same size

Use Iterator instead of Array List
Have a set be converted to iterator with type match
And move to the next element and remove
Iterator<Insured> itr = insuredSet.iterator();
while (itr.hasNext()) {
itr.next();
itr.remove();
}
Moving to the next is important here as it should take the index to remove element.

List<String> list1 = new ArrayList<>();
list1.addAll(OriginalList);
List<String> list2 = new ArrayList<>();
list2.addAll(OriginalList);
This is also an option.

If your goal is to remove all elements from the list, you can iterate over each item, and then call:
list.clear()

What about of
import java.util.Collections;
List<A> abc = Collections.synchronizedList(new ArrayList<>());

ERROR
There was a mistake when I added to the same list from where I took elements:
fun <T> MutableList<T>.mathList(_fun: (T) -> T): MutableList<T> {
for (i in this) {
this.add(_fun(i)) <--- ERROR
}
return this <--- ERROR
}
DECISION
Works great when adding to a new list:
fun <T> MutableList<T>.mathList(_fun: (T) -> T): MutableList<T> {
val newList = mutableListOf<T>() <--- DECISION
for (i in this) {
newList.add(_fun(i)) <--- DECISION
}
return newList <--- DECISION
}

Just add a break after your ArrayList.remove(A) statement

Deleting while iterating in java! but deleting other then the current object

iterator.remove(). is good however my question: if I want while to iterate, for a kind of condition, to delete another object from the array List.
Example (al being the arraylist)
for (Iterator i = al.iterator(); i.hasNext(); ){
IEvent event =(IEvent) i.next();
if (nbSendingWTS > 0 || nbSendingCTS > 0){
i.remove();
al.remove(swtsee);
al.remove(sdctsee);
System.out.println("dropping evtg");
}
This is giving me an error: Exception in thread "main" java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
Also the normal iteration:
for(IEVEnt event:al){}
is giving an error
To be more clear the swtsee a d sdctsee are taken from previous iterations on the arraylist and saved so i can delete if I have the new condition. So is there a way when I detect them to shift them to higher indexes and then I use a reverse iteration?
What to do?

You can't remove element as discussed by you.
Do not delete while iterating.
Keep a Hash for all the objects you want to delete.
Do a second iteration which delete using .remove() if the object is in Hash.

You can't delete if you are using for each style or iterator.
Use normal for loop like following
for(int i=0; i<al.size ; i++){
if(something){
al.remove(i)
i--;
}
}
This will work.

To remove with an Iterator, you collect your stuff in a new Collection, and remove in a final step, for example:
// list := List (1, 2, 4, 3, 4, 9, 6, 5, 7, 8);
List <Integer> toRemove = new ArrayList <Integer> ();
for (int i : list)
if (i % 2 == 0)
toRemove.add (i);
list.removeAll (toRemove);
I can't see how a1 is connected to your i. As long as it isn't iterated over, it should be secure to call those 2 a1.remove (...)-ings while iterating.

For your reference Java Collections
your code should work fine commenting the following lines
for (Iterator i = al.iterator(); i.hasNext(); )
{
IEvent event =(IEvent) i.next();
if (nbSendingWTS > 0 || nbSendingCTS > 0)
{
// You have got the iterator for the underlying array list(al)
**only remove the elements through iterator.**
i.remove();
// after remove thru iterator
// you are structurally modifiying arraylist directly(al.remove())
// which gives u concurrent modification
// al.remove(swtsee);
// al.remove(sdctsee);
System.out.println("dropping evtg");
}
}
and the best way to do is
List<Integer> l = new ArrayList<Integer>();
List<Integer> itemsToRemove = new ArrayList<Integer>();
for (int i=0; i < 10; ++i) {
l.add(new Integer(1));
l.add(new Integer(2));
}
for (Integer i : l)
{
if (i.intValue() == 2)
itemsToRemove.add(i);
}
l.removeAll(itemsToRemove);
System.out.println(l);