I am using three classes in my program:
Term class with variables coefficient and exponent, toString() method etc.
Polynome class, using an ArrayList to store the different Term objects.
Main class that runs the program.
Can I use the toString method of ArrayList in my Polynome class? I'm trying to, but I can't.
I need my polynome to output like this: [3x^2, 3x^1, 1x^0]
I am really confused, I'm calling the toString method of Term, using a for-loop to access each term separately.
My code:
public class Term {
private int coëfficiënt;
private int exponent;
public Term(int coëfficiënt, int exponent) {
this.coëfficiënt = coëfficiënt;
this.exponent = exponent;
}
public int getCoef() {
return coëfficiënt;
}
public int getExp() {
return exponent;
}
public String toString() {
return coëfficiënt + "x^" + exponent;
}
}
Polynome class:
public class Polynoom {
private ArrayList<Term> polynoom;
public Polynoom() {
polynoom = new ArrayList<Term>();
}
public void add(Term term) {
polynoom.add(term);
}
public Term get(int i) {
return polynoom.get(i);
}
public int size() {
return polynoom.size();
}
public String toString() {
// what should I write here?
}
}
Main class:
public class opgave3 {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Polynoom polynoom1, polynoom2, sompolynoom;
polynoom1 = new Polynoom();
polynoom1.add(new Term(1, 2));
polynoom1.add(new Term(3, 1));
polynoom1.add(new Term(1, 0));
polynoom2 = new Polynoom();
polynoom2.add(new Term(-1, 3));
polynoom2.add(new Term(2, 2));
polynoom2.add(new Term(-5, 0));
System.out.println("Tests: ");
System.out.println(polynoom1.toString());
for (int i = 0; i < polynoom1.size(); i++) {
System.out.println(polynoom1.get(i).toString());
}
System.out.println(polynoom1.get(0).toString());
}
}
You just need to use your ArrayList's toString() method as the results of Polynome's toString() method.
public class Polynome {
public ArrayList<Term> terms;
#Override
public String toString() {
if (terms != null) {
return terms.toString();
} else {
return "";
}
}
}
EDIT: The quick answer, since you put your code up is to put
return polynoom.toString();
where you have indicated. Then in your Main class you can simply write
System.out.println(polynoom1);
to show the contents in the desired format.
As Tenner said, use the toString() method of your ArrayList to get the desired output. But also make sure your Term class has a useful toString method of its own:
public class Term {
private int co, ex;
public Term(int coeff, int exp) {
co = coeff;
ex = exp;
}
#Override
public String toString() {
return co + "x^" + ex;
}
}
Add #Override toString() to your Term & Polynome class. The Term class toString() should return a string in the format of coefficientx^exponent.
Then have the Polynome class toString() return yourArrayList.toString()
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
Polynome polynome = new Polynome();
polynome.addTerm(3, 2);
polynome.addTerm(3, 1);
polynome.addTerm(1, 0);
System.out.println(polynome);
}
public static class Term {
private int coefficient;
private int exponent;
public Term(int c, int e) {
coefficient = c;
exponent = e;
}
#Override
public String toString() {
return coefficient + "x^" + exponent;
}
}
public static class Polynome {
private List<Term> terms = new ArrayList<>();
public void addTerm(int coefficient, int exponent) {
terms.add(new Term(coefficient, exponent));
}
#Override
public String toString() {
return terms.toString();
}
}
Results:
Long story short, you can ALWAYS use toString() on anything, even if it's a user defined class. When you call the method, it calls the closest parent class's toString() method, which is guaranteed to be there as Object has one. If you want to control the output of toString() called on your object, you must override it. As it is, if you have an object with a member of type ArrayList, calling your object's toString() will include a ton of extra information that you probably don't want. In order to get the output you want, you need to have the code given by #Tenner's answer, which is
public class Polynome {
public ArrayList<Term> terms;
#Override
public String toString() {
if (terms != null) {
return terms.toString();
} else {
return "";
}
}
}
But you also need to override toString() in the Term class, so that each term outputs in the form desired. The reason this is required is that when you call toString() on an ArrayList, or any other container for that matter, it iterates through the container, calling each object's toString() in turn, adding whatever formatting the container class defines. Ultimately, Term's toString() will be called, and you can control that output by overriding it in the Term class.
As for the last part of the question, you need not call Term's toString() directly, as calling the toString() method of the ArrayList will do this on its own.
Related
I need to make a programm which is like a rally, theres 2 types of vehicles, motorcycle and cars, two types of motorcycle, with and without sidecar, the thing is that I need to verify if there is just a motorcycle in an array list, I mean, two wheels vehicle. That verification should be done in a method called esDe2Ruedas(), which is called by an abstract overrided method called check() that should be the one that verifies if a group of vehicles from an array are able to run in the rally, if its true all the elements of the array must be from the same type.
Here is the code
this is how the program arrays the vehicles
GrandPrix gp1 = new GrandPrix();
gp1.agregar(v1);
//gp1.mostrar(v1);
gp1.agregar(v2);
System.out.println(gp1.check());
GrandPrix gp2 = new GrandPrix();
gp2.agregar(vt1);
gp2.agregar(vt2);
gp2.agregar(m2);
System.out.println(gp2.check());
GrandPrix gp3 = new GrandPrix();
gp3.agregar(vt1);
gp3.agregar(vt2);
gp3.agregar(m1);
System.out.println(gp3.check());
GrandPrix gp4 = new GrandPrix();
gp4.agregar(m1);
gp4.agregar(m2);
System.out.println(gp4.check());
This is the class that is using
import java.util.ArrayList;
public class GrandPrix extends Rally{
ArrayList<Vehiculo> ve = new ArrayList<Vehiculo>();
public void agregar(Vehiculo v) {
ve.add(v);
}
public void agregar(Carro c) {
ve.add(c);
}
public void agregar(Moto m) {
ve.add(m);
}
#Override
boolean check() {// HERE I VERIFY IF THE VEHICLES ARE COMPATIBLE
return false;
}
}
This is the class where everything goes on
public class Vehiculo {
private String Nombre;
private double velocidad_max;
private int peso;
private int comb;
public Vehiculo() {
setNombre("Anónimo");
setVel(130);
setPeso(1000);
setComb(0);
}
public Vehiculo(String string, double d, int i, int j) {
setNombre(string);
setVel(d);
setPeso(i);
setComb(j);
}
double rendimiento() {
return velocidad_max/peso;
}
public boolean mejor(Vehiculo otroVehiculo) {
return rendimiento()>otroVehiculo.rendimiento();
}
public String toString() {
return getNombre()+"-> Velocidad máxima = "+getVel()+" km/h, Peso = "+getPeso()+" kg";
}
/**************************************
---------SET And GET Nombre------------
***************************************/
public String getNombre() {
return Nombre;
}
public void setNombre(String nuevoNombre) {
this.Nombre=nuevoNombre;
}
/**************************************
---------SET And GET velocidad_max------------
***************************************/
public double getVel() {
return velocidad_max;
}
public void setVel(double nuevaVel) {
this.velocidad_max=nuevaVel;
}
/**************************************
---------SET And GET peso------------
***************************************/
public double getPeso() {
return peso;
}
public void setPeso(int nuevoPeso) {
this.peso=nuevoPeso;
}
/**************************************
---------SET And GET comb------------
***************************************/
public int getComb() {
return comb;
}
public void setComb(int comb) {
this.comb = comb;
}
boolean esDe2Ruedas() {
return false;
}
}
This is the class of motorcycles, which is in theory the same as the car's class, without sidecar thing
public class Moto extends Vehiculo{
private boolean sidecar;
public Moto(String string, double d, int i, int j) {
setNombre(string);
setVel(d);
setPeso(i);
setComb(j);
setSidecar(false);
}
public Moto(String string, double d, int i, int j, boolean b) {
setNombre(string);
setVel(d);
setPeso(i);
setComb(j);
setSidecar(b);
esDe2Ruedas(false);
}
public String toString() {
String str = null;
if(isSidecar())
str =super.toString()+", Moto, con sidecar";
else
str =super.toString()+", Moto";
return str;
}
public boolean isSidecar() {
return sidecar;
}
public void setSidecar(boolean sidecar) {
this.sidecar = sidecar;
}
I guess what you presented is what is given. If you came up with the design it is ok, but I believe it could be improved. Anyway, I try to respond to what I believe was your question straight away.
Vehiculo is the super type of Moto (which can have a side car and becomes 3 wheeler).
Vehiculo has a method esDe2Ruedas, which returns false.
Moto inherits that method <-- this is wrong, it should override it and, depending on side car, return the expected boolean value.
In the check method you can now distinguish between Moto and "Moto with sidecar" by using that method.
I need to make an add(Length) method that return a new length that is equal in size to the sum of the sizes of this length and the argument. I am unsure whether I need to return a double or Length and how to add
public class Length implements Comparable<Length>{
private final double length; //private! Do NOT add a getter
// This constructor must remain private
private Length(double l){
length = l;
}
public double add(Length l){
return ;
}
public double subtract(Length l){
}
public double scale(double d){
}
public double divide(Length l){
}
public double Length(Position one, Position two){
}
// TODO: For all constants, have a line:
// public static final Length ... = new Length(...);
// Use the #Override annotation on all methods
// That override a superclass method.
#Override
public boolean equals(Object other){
//TODO
}
#Override
public int hashCode(){
//TODO
}
#Override
public String toString(){
//TODO
}
// If you are overriding a method from an interface, then Java 5
// says you CANNOT use Override, but Java 6 says you MAY. Either is OK.
// #Override
public int compareTo(Length other) {
//TODO
}
// TODO Write the rest of the methods for this class, and
// the other two classes.
}
It depends on your requirement, but typically you'd want to return a new Length object.
public Length add(Length other){
// check that other is not null
return new Length(this.length + other.length);
}
You would do something similar for all the other mathematical methods.
As Rohit has stated in their comment, this makes your class immutable since there is no method that can modify the length field (but instead return a new Length object).
I am a beginner in Java and i trying to understand the abstract classes.
Below is the code that I've written; the question is: how do i write a method that will return an instance of that class.
public abstract class VehicleEngine
{
protected String name;
protected double fabricationCons;
protected double consum;
protected int mileage;
public VehicleEngine(String n, double fC)
{
name = n;
fabricationCons = fC;
mileage = 0;
consum = 0;
}
private void setFabricationCons(double fC)
{
fabricationCons = fC;
}
public abstract double currentConsum();
public String toString()
{
return name + " : " + fabricationCons + " : " + currentConsum();
}
public void addMileage(int km)
{
mileage += km;
}
public double getFabricationConsum()
{
return fabricationCons;
}
public String getName()
{
return name;
}
public int getMileage()
{
return mileage;
}
//public VehicleEngine get(String name){
//if(getName().equals(name)){
//return VehicleEngine;
//}
//return null;
//}
}
public class BenzinVehicle extends VehicleEngine
{
public BenzinVehicle(String n, double fC)
{
super(n, fC);
}
#Override
public double currentConsum()
{
if (getMileage() >= 75000) {
consum = getFabricationConsum() + 0.4;
} else {
consum = getFabricationConsum();
}
return consum;
}
}
public class DieselVehicle extends VehicleEngine
{
public DieselVehicle(String n, double fC)
{
super(n, fC);
}
#Override
public double currentConsum()
{
int cons = 0;
if (getMileage() < 5000) {
consum = getFabricationConsum();
} else {
consum = getFabricationConsum() + (getFabricationConsum() * (0.01 * (getMileage() / 5000)));
}
return consum;
}
}
This is the main.
public class Subject2
{
public static void main(String[] args)
{
VehicleEngine c1 = new BenzinVehicle("Ford Focus 1.9", 5.0);
DieselVehicle c2 = new DieselVehicle("Toyota Yaris 1.4D", 4.0);
BenzinVehicle c3 = new BenzinVehicle("Citroen C3 1.6",5.2);
c1.addMileage(30000);
c1.addMileage(55700);
c2.addMileage(49500);
c3.addMileage(35400);
System.out.println(c1);
System.out.println(c2);
System.out.println(VehicleEngine.get("Citroen C3 1.6")); //this is the line with problems
System.out.println(VehicleEngine.get("Ford Focus "));
}
}
And the output should be:
Ford Focus 1.9 : 5.0 : 5.4
Toyota Yaris 1.4D : 4.0 : 4.36
Citroen C3 1.6 : 5.2 : 5.2
null
You can not return an instance of an abstract class, by definition. What you can do, is return an instance of one of the concrete (non-abstract) subclasses that extend it. For example, inside the VehicleEngine you can create a factory that returns instances given the type of the instance and the expected parameters, but those instances will necessarily have to be concrete subclasses of VehicleEngine
Have a look at the Factory Method pattern. Your concrete classes will implement an abstract method that returns a class instance.
Abstract classes do not keep a list of their instances. Actually no Java class does that. If you really want to do that, you could add a static map to VehicleEngine like this:
private static Map<String, VehicleEngine> instanceMap = new HashMap<String, VehicleEngine>();
and change your get method to a static one like this:
public static VehicleEngine get(String name) {
return instanceMap.get(name);
}
and add this line to the end of the constructor of VehicleEngine:
VehicleEngine.instanceMap.put(n, this);
this way every new instance created puts itself into the static map. However this actually is not a good way to implement such a functionality. You could try to use a factory to create instances, or you could consider converting this class into an enum if you will have a limited predefined number of instances.
I tried looking up tutorials and videos and I understand what implementing does, although I'm a bit confused as to how one would implement a class from the Java Library. In my homework, I'm suppose to utilize the class, DataSet and make it so it accepts Comparable objects. The program is suppose to record the Min and Max values depending on the objects, in this case, I'm suppose to use strings. I wasn't sure if I needed any classes to implement the Comparable interface, so I made two classes just in case I was suppose to do so. My real question is how do I actually incorperate a String variable in the tester class to actually read and compare the object to another? thanks in advance.
public class Word implements Comparable
{
private String str;
public Word()
{
str = null;
}
public Word(String s)
{
str = s;
}
public int compareTo(Object other)
{
String n = (String) other;
return str.compareTo(n);
}
}
I wasn't sure which of the two classes would be suitable for implementing Although i think the String class below would not work at all b/c It's already a standard class so I wasn't too sure about using it
public class String implements Comparable
{
public String s;
public String()
{
s = null;
}
public String(String str)
{
s = str;
}
public int compareTo(Object other)
{
String n = (String) other;
return s.compareTo(n);
}
}
public interface Comparable
{
public int compareTo(Object other);
}
public class DataSet
{
private Object maximum;
private Object least;
private Comparable compare;
private int count;
public DataSet(Comparable s)
{
compare = s;
}
public void add(Object x)
{
if(count == 0)
least = x;
if(count == 0 || compare.compareTo(x) >=0)
maximum = x;
else if(compare.compareTo(x) <0)
least = x;
count++;
}
public Object getMaximum()
{
return maximum;
}
public Object getLeast()
{
return least;
}
}
public class DataSetTester
{
public static void main(String[] args)
{
Comparable n = new Word("sand");
DataSet data = new DataSet(n);
data.add(new Word(man));
System.out.println("Maximum Word: " + data.getMaximum());
System.out.println("Least Word: " + data.getLeast());
}
}
An interface is a contract that showes that your class contain all methodes that are implemented in the interface. In this case the CompareTo(object other). The String class already implements the comparable interface so you don't need youre own class. I think your data set class should look something like this :
public class DataSet<T implements Comparable>
{
private T maximum;
private T least;
private T count;
public void add(T x)
{
if(count == 0){
least = x;
maximum = x;
}
else if(least.compareTo(x) > 0)
least = x;
else if(maximum.compareTo(x) < 0)
maximum = x;
count++;
}
public T getMaximum()
{
return maximum;
}
public T getLeast()
{
return least;
}
}
T is a generic type and in your case it should be String, Here is how you create a new Data set:
DataSet<String> ds = new DataSet<String>;
I'm curious. What could be the reason that a Comparator shuffles entries on each
application start?
final static class ContactsListComparator implements Comparator
{
public int compare(Object o1, Object o2)
{
if((o1.toString().compareTo(o2.toString()))<0)
{
return -1;
}
if((o1.toString().compareTo(o2.toString()))>0)
{
return 1;
}
else
{
return 0;
}
}
}
First App Start:
Second App Start
As mentioned in one the answer
The Comparator actually compares an custom object Contact
public class Contact
{
// Members
private String _contactFirstName;
private String _contactLastName;
private long _contactLastModified;
// Constructor
public Contact()
{
set_contactLastModified();
}
public Contact(String contactFirstName)
{
_contactFirstName = contactFirstName;
set_contactLastModified();
}
// Accessable Getters
public String get_contactFirstName()
{
return _contactFirstName;
}
public String get_contactLastName()
{
return _contactLastName;
}
public long get_contactLastModified()
{
return _contactLastModified;
}
public void set_contactLastModified()
{
_contactLastModified = System.currentTimeMillis();
}
}
your toString method probably isn't overridden for your objects representing the contacts. It will return a hash string for those objects, which varies every time your app is run.
You can fix this either of two ways:
Override the toString() method in your Contact object to return the contact's name (1), or
Change the Comparator to Comparator<Contact> so it gets Contact objects as parameters (2)
for (1), add this to your Contact class:
#Override public String toString() {
return get_contactFirstName();
}
for (2) you would end up with this Comparator implementation:
final static class ContactsListComparator implements Comparator<Contact> {
public int compare(Contact o1, Contact o2) {
return contact1.get_contactFirstName().compareTo(contact2.get_contactFirstName());
}
}
you don't even need to check for the <0 or >0, but you can just return whatever the String comparison gives.
I would use:
final static class ContactsListComparator implements Comparator<Contact>
{
public int compare(Contact c1,Contact c2)
{
int i=c1.get_contactLastName().compareTo(c2.get_contactLastName());
if(i!=0) return i;
return c1.get_contactFirstName().compareTo(c2.get_contactFirstName());;
}
}
Your first example is basically the same as
final static class ContactsListComparator implements Comparator {
public int compare(Object o1, Object o2) {
return o1.toString().compareTo(o2.toString());
}
}
This would work if you override toString() like
public String toString() {
return _contactFirstName + ' ' + _contactLastName;
}
However, a comparator which compares the intended fields is better as has been suggested.