I am using pholser's port. I have to generate strings matching a given pattern like \[a-zA-Z0-9\\.\\-\\\\;\\:\\_\\#\\[\\]\\^/\\|\\}\\{]* Length 40.
I extend the Generator class as:
public class InputGenerator extends Generator<TestData> {...}
It overloads a function:
publicTestData generate(SourceOfRandomness random, GenerationStatus status) {...}
Now, random has functions like nextDouble(), nextInt() but there is nothing for strings! How can I generate random strings matching the above pattern?
Find below snippet for a custom generator which implement the generate(..) method to return a random string matching your posted pattern.
public class MyCharacterGenerator extends Generator<String> {
private static final String LOWERCASE_CHARS = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz";
private static final String UPPERCASE_CHARS = "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ";
private static final String NUMBERS = "0123456789";
private static final String SPECIAL_CHARS = ".-\\;:_#[]^/|}{";
private static final String ALL_MY_CHARS = LOWERCASE_CHARS
+ UPPERCASE_CHARS + NUMBERS + SPECIAL_CHARS;
public static final int CAPACITY = 40;
public MyCharacterGenerator () {
super(String.class);
}
#Override
public String generate(SourceOfRandomness random, GenerationStatus status) {
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(CAPACITY);
for (int i = 0; i < CAPACITY; i++) {
int randomIndex = random.nextInt(ALL_MY_CHARS.length());
sb.append(ALL_MY_CHARS.charAt(randomIndex));
}
return sb.toString();
}
}
edit A simple unit test to demonstrate the usage of the MyCharacterGenerator class.
import com.pholser.junit.quickcheck.ForAll;
import com.pholser.junit.quickcheck.From;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertTrue;
import org.junit.contrib.theories.Theories;
import org.junit.contrib.theories.Theory;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
#RunWith(Theories.class)
public class MyCharacterGeneratorTest {
#Theory
public void shouldHold(#ForAll #From(MyCharacterGenerator.class) String s) {
// here you should add your unit test which uses the generated output
//
// assertTrue(doMyUnitTest(s) == expectedResult);
// the below lines only for demonstration and currently
// check that the generated random has the expected
// length and matches the expected pattern
System.out.println("shouldHold(): " + s);
assertTrue(s.length() == MyCharacterGenerator.CAPACITY);
assertTrue(s.matches("[a-zA-Z0-9.\\-\\\\;:_#\\[\\]^/|}{]*"));
}
}
sample output generated by shouldHold
shouldHold(): MD}o/LAkW/hbJVWPGdI;:RHpwo_T.lGs^DOFwu2.
shouldHold(): IT_O{8Umhkz{#PY:pmK6}Cb[Wc19GqGZjWVa#4li
shouldHold(): KQwpEz.CW28vy_/WJR3Lx2.tRC6uLIjOTQtYP/VR
shouldHold(): pc2_T4hLdZpK78UfcVmU\RTe9WaJBSGJ}5v#z[Z\
...
There is no random.nextString(), but there is a way to generate random strings within junit-quickcheck-generators library. You can access it when creating new generators using gen().type(String.class). However, it seems we don't have much control over it.
Here is a silly example of a StringBuilder generator to demonstrate how to use the String generator:
import com.pholser.junit.quickcheck.generator.GenerationStatus;
import com.pholser.junit.quickcheck.generator.Generator;
import com.pholser.junit.quickcheck.random.SourceOfRandomness;
public class StringBuilderGenerator extends Generator<StringBuilder> {
public StringBuilderGenerator() {
super(StringBuilder.class);
}
#Override
public StringBuilder generate(SourceOfRandomness random, GenerationStatus status) {
String s = gen().type(String.class).generate(random, status);
return new StringBuilder(s);
}
}
I just made a library that suppose to do what you want in a generic way: https://github.com/SimY4/coregex
Simple usage example:
import com.pholser.junit.quickcheck.Property;
import com.pholser.junit.quickcheck.runner.JUnitQuickcheck;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
import java.util.UUID;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals;
#RunWith(JUnitQuickcheck.class)
public class CoregexGeneratorTest {
#Property
public void shouldGenerateMatchingUUIDString(
#Regex("[0-9a-f]{8}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-5][0-9a-f]{3}-[089ab][0-9a-f]{3}-[0-9a-f]{12}")
String uuid) {
assertEquals(uuid, UUID.fromString(uuid).toString());
}
}
Related
I need to obtain unique primary which is less than 24 char length, I have tried using SecureRandom and i read its documentation says A cryptographically strong random number. is this Reliable ? all I need to have Alphanumeric with max of 24 char length.
Like,
BQkjEQwAFi0YLBsOHzkLADAiAhshFw
NQEfJR0oJzclNwEOBAE2EicjBTYwHg
JygOFhsZJSkNNTgQERg7PREcOxUCFA
Fw46JykWJhQuAxs5NCEzDAQHBikcGw
LhAOHBUbMSYgPDI2Chk4LAs3KTMgLA
FCgmATotByYnLTw0HwQUDgspOS0fBA
LSkCHCofHxc9GhcSLiEgHSEzDgwODw
LDENBg0cKzAKHxg8Hzk4Ei8MIjs6FQ
PSIhCjo6DxMHETkyNQUOFgU1MzEEBg
EwQTJx0bMCYgAQsaJzgJOwEAMy0ZHw
the below code gave me the same but i don't know how far i can relay on SecureRandom, since this is primary key for XYZ transactions and expected to have 200k plus transaction on one day. latest we will retain 180 days transactions in Oracle DB.
import org.apache.commons.codec.binary.Base64;
import org.slf4j.Logger;
import java.nio.ByteBuffer;
import java.security.SecureRandom;
import java.util.regex.Matcher;
import java.util.regex.Pattern;
import static org.slf4j.LoggerFactory.getLogger;
public class RandomGenUtil {
private static RandomGenUtil instance;
private static final int RANDOM_ID_SEED_LENGTH = 22;
private static final String ALL_CAPS = "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ";
private static final String SMALL_CAPS = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz";
private static final String NUMBERS = "0123456789";
private static final String RANDOM_ID_SEED = ALL_CAPS + SMALL_CAPS + NUMBERS;
private static SecureRandom randomGen;
public RandomGenUtil() {
if (RandomGenUtil.randomGen == null) {
RandomGenUtil.randomGen = new SecureRandom();
}
}
public static RandomGenUtil getInstance() {
if (RandomGenUtil.instance == null) {
RandomGenUtil.instance = new RandomGenUtil();
}
return RandomGenUtil.instance;
}
public static String generateRandomId() {
int i = 0;
StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder();
while (i < RANDOM_ID_SEED_LENGTH) {
builder.append((char) randomGen.nextInt(RANDOM_ID_SEED.length()));
i++;
}
ByteBuffer bb = ByteBuffer.wrap(builder.toString().getBytes());
return Base64.encodeBase64URLSafeString(bb.array());
}
}
I was able to get class level variable's declarations using the following code. But I only need the variable name. This is the output I get for following code - [private boolean flag = true;]
import com.github.javaparser.JavaParser;
import com.github.javaparser.ast.CompilationUnit;
import com.github.javaparser.ast.body.ClassOrInterfaceDeclaration;
import com.github.javaparser.ast.visitor.VoidVisitorAdapter;
import java.io.FileInputStream;
public class CuPrinter{
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
// creates an input stream for the file to be parsed
FileInputStream in = new FileInputStream("C:\\Users\\arosh\\IdeaProjects\\Bot_Twitter\\src\\MyBot.java");
CompilationUnit cu;
try {
// parse the file
cu = JavaParser.parse(in);
} finally {
in.close();
}
cu.accept(new ClassVisitor(), null);
}
private static class ClassVisitor extends VoidVisitorAdapter<Void> {
#Override
public void visit(ClassOrInterfaceDeclaration n, Void arg) {
/* here you can access the attributes of the method.
this method will be called for all methods in this
CompilationUnit, including inner class methods */
System.out.println(n.getFields());
super.visit(n, arg);
}
}
}
You can use the following simple regex:
final String regex = "^((private|public|protected)?\\s+)?.*\\s+(\\w+);$";
Which then can be compiled into a Pattern:
final Pattern pattern = Pattern.compile(regex);
And then finally be used in a for-loop:
for(final String field : n.getFields()){
// create a regex-matcher
final Matcher matcher = pattern.matcher(field);
// if field matches regex
if(matcher.matches()){
// get the last group -> the fieldName
final String name = matcher.group(matcher.groupCount());
System.out.println("FieldName: " + name);
}
}
You can try this. If you have more than one variables in FieldDeclarations, use one more for loop inside.
public void visit(ClassOrInterfaceDeclaration n, Void arg) {
super.visit(n, arg);
for(FieldDeclaration ff:n.getFields())
{
System.out.println(ff.getVariable(0).getName());
}
}
My goal is to use the periodic table of elements (or a list) to get information about a specific element in Java. I want to search it by atomic number and symbol (but that conversion should be simple).
I found that information in this JQuery plugin. But it is stored as a JSON file.
It seems like it would be most efficient to hardcode the information (since it doesn't change too often and due to performance reasons), but how do I convert JSON to a hardcoded enum?
Since:
the information about elements is totally static
each elemental symbol is alphanumeric
the discovery of new elements is both rare and irrelevant (because they are extremely unstable)
An enum seems a good option:
public enum Element {
H(1, "Hydrogen", 1.008, -259.1),
He(2, "Helium", 4.003, -272.2),
Li(3, "Lithium", 6.941, 180.5),
// ... 90+ others
;
private static class Holder {
static Map<Integer, Element> map = new HashMap<Integer, Element>();
}
private final int atomicNumber;
private final String fullName;
private final double atomicMass;
private final double meltingPoint;
private Element(int atomicNumber, String fullName, double atomicMass, double meltingPoint) {
this.atomicNumber = atomicNumber;
this.fullName = fullName;
this.atomicMass = atomicMass;
this.meltingPoint = meltingPoint;
Holder.map.put(atomicNumber, this);
}
public static Element forAtomicNumber(int atomicNumber) {
return Holder.map.get(atomicNumber);
}
public int getAtomicNumber() {
return atomicNumber;
}
public String getFullName() {
return fullName;
}
public double getAtomicMass() {
return atomicMass;
}
public double getMeltingPoint() {
return meltingPoint;
}
}
There's a bit of java kung fu going on here that deserves an explanation. The map is put inside a static inner (holder) class so it gets initialized before the enum instances are initialized, that way they can add themselves to it. If not in the inner static class, it would not be initialize, because the first thing initialized in the enum class must be the instances, but static inner classes are initialized before the class is initialized.
This approach means the the instances don't need to be listed in any particular order (they could be alphabetical listed, or otherwise).
Suppose you have a PeriodicTable.txt file with following format:
ATOMIC_NUMBER SYMBOL OTHER_INFO
Like:
1 H Hydrogen -> Lightest element
2 He Helium -> Second lightest element
3 Li Lithium -> Third lightest element
// and so on...
Then you can have a fairly straightforward implementation of your own PeriodicTable like following:
import java.io.IOException;
import java.nio.file.Files;
import java.nio.file.Paths;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Scanner;
public class PeriodicTable
{
private List<Element> elements;
public PeriodicTable() throws IOException
{
elements = new ArrayList<>();
List<String> list = Files.readAllLines(Paths.get("PeriodicTable.txt"));
list.forEach(this::process);
}
public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException
{
final PeriodicTable periodicTable = new PeriodicTable();
System.out.println(periodicTable.getElementByNumber(1));
System.out.println(periodicTable.getElementBySymbol("Li"));
}
private void process(String line)
{
try (Scanner scanner = new Scanner(line))
{
int atomicNumber = scanner.nextInt();
String symbol = scanner.next();
String info = scanner.nextLine();
elements.add(new Element(atomicNumber, symbol, info));
}
}
public Element getElementByNumber(int atomicNumber)
{
return elements.stream().
filter(e -> e.atomicNumber == atomicNumber).
findFirst().orElse(null);
}
public Element getElementBySymbol(String symbol)
{
return elements.stream().
filter(e -> e.symbol.equals(symbol)).
findFirst().orElse(null);
}
private class Element
{
private String info;
private int atomicNumber;
private String symbol;
public Element(int atomicNumber, String symbol, String info)
{
this.atomicNumber = atomicNumber;
this.symbol = symbol;
this.info = info;
}
public String toString()
{
return "[ " + atomicNumber + " " + symbol + " " + info + " ]";
}
}
}
If you see, I have created an Element class which holds the atomic number, symbol, and info of the element, and I have a list of elements in PeriodicTable class.
I read the PeriodicTable data from the PeriodicTable.txt file and process each line of the text file by parsing it appropriately and creating element for each line and adding it to the elements.
I also add two methods for filtering the element based on atomic number and symbol properties.
The code works in Java 8, so you should have at least that to run it, or one can easily write a code for this which will run on earlier JVMs, though it won't be as compact as this one.
Since there are just limited number of elements in the PeriodicTable, I don't bother to have elements sorted by their atomic number though they will be if your PeriodicTable.txt file has elements with increasing atomic number.
Since we know the exact number of elements in the PeriodicTable and its something that doesn't change frequently, the filtering methods take constant time.
All you have to do now is create a proper PeriodicTable.txt file which can then be used by the program.
Note: The PeriodicTable class can be written in better ways as well. This is just an example. I can have it as Singleton. I can even have enum of Element with hardcoded values, but I think loading data from file will keep the code cleaner.
One can even augment the PeriodicTable class with additional properties to each Element, by changing the process() method accordingly, and changing the format of the text file based on the assumptions, and augmenting the Element class, so that it can hold even more information.
Just for fun, following is a Singleton based solution:
// PeriodicTable.java
import java.io.IOException;
import java.nio.file.Files;
import java.nio.file.Paths;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Scanner;
public class PeriodicTable
{
private static PeriodicTable periodicTable = new PeriodicTable();
private List<Element> elements;
private PeriodicTable()
{
try
{
elements = new ArrayList<>();
List<String> list = Files.readAllLines(Paths.get("PeriodicTable.txt"));
list.forEach(this::process);
}
catch (IOException e)
{
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
public static Element getElementByNumber(int atomicNumber)
{
return periodicTable.elements.stream().
filter(e -> e.atomicNumber == atomicNumber).
findFirst().orElse(null);
}
public static Element getElementBySymbol(String symbol)
{
return periodicTable.elements.stream().
filter(e -> e.symbol.equals(symbol)).
findFirst().orElse(null);
}
private void process(String line)
{
try (Scanner scanner = new Scanner(line))
{
int atomicNumber = scanner.nextInt();
String symbol = scanner.next();
String info = scanner.nextLine();
elements.add(new Element(atomicNumber, symbol, info));
}
}
private class Element
{
private String info;
private int atomicNumber;
private String symbol;
public Element(int atomicNumber, String symbol, String info)
{
this.atomicNumber = atomicNumber;
this.symbol = symbol;
this.info = info;
}
public String toString()
{
return "[ " + atomicNumber + " " + symbol + " " + info + " ]";
}
}
}
// Demo.java
public class Demo
{
public static void main(String[] args)
{
System.out.println(PeriodicTable.getElementByNumber(1));
System.out.println(PeriodicTable.getElementBySymbol("Li"));
}
}
Now you can use your PeriodicTable safely and directly as shown in the Demo method.
sI use a simple text-file like this
BMG-P (someLongComplicatedExpression)(.*P)
BMG T (someLongComplicatedExpression)(.*[Tt])
BMG MPA (someLongComplicatedExpression)(.*MPA)
to configure my application (Simple import with bufferedReader.readLine().split("\t")). What is bugging me is the redundance.
I am thinking about a solution like this:
%s=(someLongComplicatedExpression)
BMG-P %s(.*P)
BMG T %s(.*[Tt])
BMG MPA %s(.*MPA)
where I read the value of my variables (like %s), then replace their occurrences in the Strings after the import.
My questions are:
What alternative approaches do you know?
What is an easy way to implement the replacement of my variables in my code?
Can you point me to any frameworks that support property-files like that?
I wrote this simple extension to the Java Properties class:
import java.io.Serializable;
import java.util.Properties;
import java.util.regex.Matcher;
import java.util.regex.Pattern;
/**
* Allows properties to contain expansions of the form ${propertyName}. This
* class makes no attempt to detect circular references, so be careful.
*/
public class ExpandingProperties extends Properties implements PropertySource {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 259782782423517925L;
private final Expander expander = new Expander();
#Override
public String getProperty(String key) {
return expander.expand(super.getProperty(key), this);
}
}
class Expander implements Serializable {
private static final long serialVersionUID = -2229337918353092460L;
private final Pattern pattern = Pattern.compile("\\$\\{([^}]+)\\}");
/**
* Expands variables of the form "${variableName}" within the
* specified string, using the property source to lookup the
* relevant value.
*/
public String expand(final String s, final PropertySource propertySource) {
if (s == null) {
return null;
}
final StringBuffer sb = new StringBuffer();
final Matcher matcher = pattern.matcher(s);
while (matcher.find()) {
final String variableName = matcher.group(1);
final String value = propertySource.getProperty(variableName);
if (value == null) {
throw new RuntimeException("No property found for: " + variableName);
}
matcher.appendReplacement(sb, value.replace("$", "\\$"));
}
matcher.appendTail(sb);
return sb.toString();
}
}
interface PropertySource {
String getProperty(String key);
}
Example usage:
public static void main(String[] args) {
Properties properties = new ExpandingProperties();
properties.put("myVar", "myLongExpression");
properties.put("foo", "${myVar}_1");
properties.put("bar", "${foo}_abc");
System.out.println(properties.getProperty("bar"));
}
Prints:
myLongExpression_1_abc
As ExpandingProperties is an extension of Properties it inherits all the load...() methods for loading values from property files.
An alternative is EProperties which does a similar thing to the above code, but goes even further and allows you to nest property files etc. I found it overkill for what I needed.
When I run this code i get 2 numbers (which is good) but the numbers generated are the same (which is bad) and I dont want the numbers to be the same. I've done this as an experiment for a rpg I was going to make so I thought it would be beter if each weapon had a different class.
The main class:
package battlesimMK2;
public class Main {
public static void main(String Arg[]) {
String WeponEquiped = "BasicAxe";
System.out.print(BasicAxe.Str);
System.out.print(BasicAxe.Str);
}
}
The basic axe class:
package battlesimMK2;
import java.util.Random;
public class BasicAxe {
static Random rnd = new Random();
static int Str = rnd.nextInt(4)+5;
}
This line:
static int Str = rnd.nextInt(4)+5;
declares a static variable and initializes it once. If you want the code to run each to you access Str, you should make it a method:
public static int getStrength() {
return rnd.nextInt(4)+5;
}
Then call it with this code in Main.main:
System.out.print(BasicAxe.getStrength());
System.out.print(BasicAxe.getStrength());
An alternative which would probably be more object-oriented would be to make the strength an instance field, so that each axe created had a possibly-different (but persistent) strength:
public class BasicAxe {
private static final Random rnd = new Random();
private final int strength;
public BasicAxe() {
strength = rnd.nextInt(4)+5;
}
public int getStrength() {
return strength;
}
}
Then in Main.main:
BasicAxe axe1 = new BasicAxe();
BasicAxe axe2 = new BasicAxe();
System.out.println(axe1.getStrength());
System.out.println(axe2.getStrength());
System.out.println(axe1.getStrength());
Here, the first and third lines of output will be the same - but the second will (probably) be different.
You're generating a single random number and printing it twice. Try something like this instead:
package battlesimMK2;
public class Main {
public static void main(String Arg[]) {
String WeponEquiped = "BasicAxe";
System.out.print(BasicAxe.Str());
System.out.print(BasicAxe.Str());
}
}
package battlesimMK2;
import java.util.Random;
public class BasicAxe {
static Random rnd = new Random();
static int Str() { return rnd.nextInt(4)+5; }
}
This because this line
static int Str = rnd.nextInt(4)+5;
runs just one time in whole the lifecycle of your application. It's static value, you should use static method instead.
Because you define the Str variable as static, only a single copy of that variable is shared between all your BasicAxe classes.
The way to get a different answer each time you ask for the int value is, to use the example posted by the previous poster,
String WeponEquiped = "BasicAxe";
System.out.print(BasicAxe.getStrength());
System.out.print(BasicAxe.getStrength());
But, if you want to create an actual instance of the class BasicAxe, which keeps it's value so that each time you ask for the strength you get the same value, you'll need something different.