Maven compile-phase bound plugin running to late. - java

I have two maven plugins configured. One, the exec-maven-plugin, is bound to the compile phase. The other, maven-resources-plugin, is bound to the prepare-package phase. I need exec to run before resources, and I figured this should work because the compile phase comes before the prepare-package phase in the build life-cycle. I must be missing something.
Here are the two configurations:
<plugin>
<groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
<artifactId>exec-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.2.1</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>build-tracker</id>
<phase>compile</phase>
<goals>
<goal>exec</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<!--Config here-->
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
And:
<plugin>
<artifactId>maven-resources-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.5</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>copy-ftl</id>
<phase>prepare-package</phase>
<goals>
<goal>copy-resources</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<!--Config here-->
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
Why are these executing out of order?

Related

How to make PMD run at the start of the maven build rather than at the end of it?

I have the following configuration within my pom.xml that checks for PMD violations:
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-pmd-plugin</artifactId>
<version>${pmd.version}</version>
<configuration>
<linkXRef>true</linkXRef>
<sourceEncoding>UTF-8</sourceEncoding>
<minimumTokens>100</minimumTokens>
<targetJdk>1.7</targetJdk>
</configuration>
<executions>
<execution>
<goals>
<goal>check</goal>
<goal>cpd-check</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
When I run a build using the command mvn clean install, the PMD checks are run as last step of the build process. Rather, I would want the PMD checks to run as the first step of the build.
Does anybody know how could I achieve this?
Add the phase element to your POM.
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-pmd-plugin</artifactId>
<version>${pmd.version}</version>
<configuration>
<linkXRef>true</linkXRef>
<sourceEncoding>UTF-8</sourceEncoding>
<minimumTokens>100</minimumTokens>
<targetJdk>1.7</targetJdk>
</configuration>
<executions>
<execution>
<phase>validate</phase>
<goals>
<goal>check</goal>
<goal>cpd-check</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
The validate phase is the first phase of the maven lifecycle: http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-the-lifecycle.html
Thanks for your answers #JamesB and #PetrMensik for letting me know about the phase element within the POM. It helped me solve my problem. I finally settled for this:
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-pmd-plugin</artifactId>
<version>${pmd.version}</version>
<configuration>
<linkXRef>true</linkXRef>
<sourceEncoding>UTF-8</sourceEncoding>
<minimumTokens>100</minimumTokens>
<targetJdk>1.7</targetJdk>
</configuration>
<executions>
<execution>
<phase>compile</phase>
<goals>
<goal>check</goal>
<goal>cpd-check</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
I used the phase:compile, the reason being I have plenty of tests in my project which take up a lot of time to execute. And, its quite irritating to wait for those tests to finish and be notified about a PMD violation at the end of all the tests. I needed something just before the tests. Hence, I settled for compile.
Further suggestions are welcome. :)
You need to hook execution of this plugin to a different Maven lifecycle phase (validation comes as the first one in default lifecycle).
<executions>
<execution>
<phase>validate</phase>
<goals>
<goal>check</goal>
<goal>cpd-check</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
See this the list of the available Maven phases for reference.
I set build configuration
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-pmd-plugin</artifactId>
<version>${pmd.plugin.version}</version>
<configuration>
<failOnViolation>true</failOnViolation>
<printFailingErrors>true</printFailingErrors>
</configuration>
<executions>
<execution>
<goals>
<goal>check</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>

wrong execution order when bound maven assembly plugin twice to package phase

I want to use proguard maven plugin to execute between 2 assembly descriptor (one of folder format and one of zip format) so I define my pom:
<plugin>
<artifactId>maven-assembly-plugin</artifactId>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>raw-assembly</id>
<phase>package</phase>
<goals>
<goal>single</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<appendAssemblyId>false</appendAssemblyId>
<finalName>raw</finalName>
<descriptors>
<descriptor>src/assemble/raw.xml</descriptor>
</descriptors>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>com.github.wvengen</groupId>
<artifactId>proguard-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.0.7</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<phase>package</phase>
<goals>
<goal>proguard</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
<configuration>
<options>
<option>#${project.build.directory}/raw/proguard/proguard.cfg</option>
</options>
</configuration>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<artifactId>maven-assembly-plugin</artifactId>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>distro-assembly</id>
<phase>package</phase>
<goals>
<goal>single</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<appendAssemblyId>false</appendAssemblyId>
<finalName>distro</finalName>
<descriptors>
<descriptor>src/assemble/distro.xml</descriptor>
</descriptors>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
But the maven assembly plugin always executes 2 descriptor before proguard plugin.
I use Maven 3.2.2
Thanks,
When determining run order, Maven runs goals bound to earlier phases in the lifecycle first. If multiple goals are bound to the same phase, then they run in the order they are listed in the POM.
When you want to run a plugin more than once, you don't add the plugin twice as you've shown, you put multiple executions in a single plugin. If you want the proguard plugin to execute before the assemblies, you may bind the goals to an earlier phase (e.g. prepare-package). If the phase must be package for some reason, then the proguard plugin config must appear before the assembly plugin config in the file.
If you need the first assembly execution to run before the proguard plugin execution, and the second assembly execution after, then you need to use two phases. The proguard plugin config needs to appear in the file before the assembly plugin, and the execution should use phase package. The first assembly execution should use prepare-package, the second package.
This is your POM rearranged to work, with everything bound to the package phase as was shown in the original question.
<plugin>
<groupId>com.github.wvengen</groupId>
<artifactId>proguard-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.0.7</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<phase>package</phase> <!-- fixed spelling -->
<goals>
<goal>proguard</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
<configuration>
<options>
<option>#${project.build.directory}/raw/proguard/proguard.cfg</option>
</options>
</configuration>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<artifactId>maven-assembly-plugin</artifactId>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>raw-assembly</id>
<phase>package</phase>
<goals>
<goal>single</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<appendAssemblyId>false</appendAssemblyId>
<finalName>raw</finalName>
<descriptors>
<descriptor>src/assemble/raw.xml</descriptor>
</descriptors>
</configuration>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>distro-assembly</id>
<phase>package</phase>
<goals>
<goal>single</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<appendAssemblyId>false</appendAssemblyId>
<finalName>distro</finalName>
<descriptors>
<descriptor>src/assemble/distro.xml</descriptor>
</descriptors>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
Package is spelled wrong in program
<plugin>
<groupId>com.github.wvengen</groupId>
<artifactId>proguard-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.0.7</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<phase>packge</phase> <--- Spelling Issue

How to alternate between main classes in maven exec plugin?

I have the following pom.xml:
<plugin>
<groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
<artifactId>exec-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.2.1</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>wizard</id>
<goals>
<goal>java</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<mainClass>br.com.rafa.WizardLauncher</mainClass>
</configuration>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>default-cli</id>
<goals>
<goal>java</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<mainClass>br.com.rafa.DesktopLauncher</mainClass>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
If I run mvn exec:java, DesktopLauncher is executed.
How can I alternate between the executions from the command line? In other words, I would like to execute WizardLauncher without changing pom.xml.

Tomcat7 Maven Plugin and JaCoCo

Is there any way to get code coverage using JaCoCo with the tomcat7-maven-plugin embedded instance?
The jacoco-maven-plugin is configured in my WAR's POM to instrument my unit tests, but I'm not sure how to attach the jacoco agent to the embedded Tomcat instance to instrument my integration tests that run against Tomcat. Given that the Tomcat instance is embedded, I'm not sure if this approach is possible. Is there any other way to accomplish this? I can probably switch from using the Tomcat Maven Plugin to using Cargo to get coverage, but I'd prefer to stick with the Tomcat plugin if possible.
Here are a few relevant snippets from my POM:
<plugin>
<groupId>org.jacoco</groupId>
<artifactId>jacoco-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>0.6.2.201302030002</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<goals>
<goal>prepare-agent</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<artifactId>maven-failsafe-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.14</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>integration-tests</id>
<goals>
<goal>integration-test</goal>
<goal>verify</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.tomcat.maven</groupId>
<artifactId>tomcat7-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.1</version>
<configuration>
<systemProperties>
<!-- as expected, this system property doesn't work since Tomcat is embedded, but this is the type of config I'm looking for -->
<JAVA_OPTS>-javaagent:${project.build.directory}/${jacoco.jar}=destfile=${project.build.directory}/jacoco.exec,append=true</JAVA_OPTS>
</systemProperties>
</configuration>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>tomcat-startup</id>
<goals>
<goal>run-war-only</goal>
</goals>
<phase>pre-integration-test</phase>
<configuration>
<fork>true</fork>
</configuration>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>tomcat-shutdown</id>
<goals>
<goal>shutdown</goal>
</goals>
<phase>post-integration-test</phase>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
Versions: Maven 3.0.4, Tomcat Maven Plugin 2.1, Jacoco 0.6.2.201302030002, Java 7
I know its been awhile since the question was posted but I don't feel the answer really addressed the root of the problem. Code coverage may work with failsafe or surefire if you are running tests within those plugins. However, if you just want to monitor tomcat with jacoco to get a coverage report current information doesn't provide that. I found that the tomcat7-maven-plugin doesn't allow you to inject the -javaagent for jacoco by simply providing JAVA_OPTS. Switching to cargo I was able to do that like so.
<plugin>
<groupId>org.jacoco</groupId>
<artifactId>jacoco-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>0.7.2.201409121644</version>
<configuration>
<destFile>${sonar.jacoco.reportPath}</destFile>
<dataFile>${sonar.jacoco.reportPath}</dataFile>
<outputDirectory>${project.reporting.outputDirectory}/jacoco-it</outputDirectory>
<classDumpDir>${project.reporting.outputDirectory}/jacoco-it/classes</classDumpDir>
<skip>${skipITs}</skip>
</configuration>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>jacoco-agent</id>
<phase>pre-integration-test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>prepare-agent</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<destFile>${sonar.jacoco.reportPath}</destFile>
<propertyName>jacoco.agent.itArgLine</propertyName>
</configuration>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>jacoco-report</id>
<phase>post-integration-test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>dump</goal>
<goal>report</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.codehaus.cargo</groupId>
<artifactId>cargo-maven2-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.4.11</version>
<configuration>
<skip>${skipITs}</skip>
<container>
<containerId>tomcat7x</containerId>
<zipUrlInstaller>
<url>http://archive.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.16/bin/apache-tomcat-7.0.16.zip
</url>
<downloadDir>${project.build.directory}/downloads</downloadDir>
<extractDir>${project.build.directory}/extracts</extractDir>
</zipUrlInstaller>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>ojdbc</groupId>
<artifactId>ojdbc6</artifactId>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
</container>
<configuration>
<home>${project.build.directory}/catalina-base</home>
<properties>
<cargo.jvmargs>${jacoco.agent.itArgLine},output=tcpserver,port=6300 -Drunmode=TEST</cargo.jvmargs>
<cargo.servlet.port>9090</cargo.servlet.port>
</properties>
<configfiles>
<configfile>
<file>${basedir}/src/test/conf/context.xml</file>
<todir>conf/Catalina/localhost/</todir>
<tofile>context.xml.default</tofile>
</configfile>
</configfiles>
</configuration>
</configuration>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>start-tomcat</id>
<phase>pre-integration-test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>start</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>stop-tomcat</id>
<phase>post-integration-test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>stop</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
the important parts are:
<plugin><groupId>org.jacoco</groupId> ...<propertyName>jacoco.agent.itArgLine</propertyName>
<cargo.jvmargs>${jacoco.agent.itArgLine},output=tcpserver,port=6300 </cargo.jvmargs>
When report target is run on the jacoco plugin it will create a directory in ${projectbase}/target/site/jacoco-it/index.html with your coverage report. I use this with the soapui-maven-plugin but it could be used with selenium-maven-plugin also.
You don't need pass JAVA_OPTS to tomcat embedded if you use maven-failsafe-plugin (or maven-surefire-plugin) to run yours integration test. It is because tomcat embedded run in the same process of maven-failsafe-plugin.
So when jacoco-maven-plugin execute prepare-agent it sets argLine that maven-failsafe-plugin uses too.
I created a project to test this, below part of pom:
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.jacoco</groupId>
<artifactId>jacoco-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>0.6.2.201302030002</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<goals>
<goal>prepare-agent</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<includes>
<include>my.project.package.only.*</include>
</includes>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.tomcat.maven</groupId>
<artifactId>tomcat7-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.1</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>tomcat-startup</id>
<goals>
<goal>run-war-only</goal>
</goals>
<phase>pre-integration-test</phase>
<configuration>
<fork>true</fork>
</configuration>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>tomcat-shutdown</id>
<goals>
<goal>shutdown</goal>
</goals>
<phase>post-integration-test</phase>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-failsafe-plugin</artifactId>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>integration-tests</id>
<phase>integration-test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>integration-test</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
<artifactId>selenium-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.3</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>start</id>
<phase>pre-integration-test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>start-server</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<background>true</background>
<logOutput>true</logOutput>
<multiWindow>true</multiWindow>
</configuration>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>stop</id>
<phase>post-integration-test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>stop-server</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
</plugins>
you can try to take a look at a workaround at this post: http://dougonjava.blogspot.co.il/2013/07/integration-testing-using-maven-tomcat.html
I resolved problems when setting up JaCoCo agent with embedded Tomcat by instrumenting classes offline and then just placing JaCoCo agent on Tomcat classpath (plugin dependency) and adding file jacoco-agent.properties.
I put the working configuration on my blog:
http://burkond.blogspot.de/2014/05/selenium-in-sonar-code-coverage-metrics.html
I had the exact same problem and the only solution I found was to set the MAVEN_OPTS previously to the Maven build (for example on the command line or in the configuration of a Jenkins job):
export MAVEN_OPTS=-javaagent:~/.m2/repository/org/jacoco/org.jacoco.agent/0.7.4.201502262128/org.jacoco.agent-0.7.4.201502262128-runtime.jar=destfile=./target/jacoco.exec,append=true
This will attach the jacoco agent to the embedded tomcat instance, which will report back the coverage results into the given destfile.
First, it is important that the path to the jacoco runtime JAR is correct. You can manually download and refer to it or use another Maven command to download it into your local .m2 repository:
mvn org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-dependency-plugin:2.8:get -Dartifact=org.jacoco:org.jacoco.agent:0.7.4.201502262128:jar:runtime
Second, make sure that the path to the jacoco.exec file is correct. In my case, I already have an existing jacoco.exec file in the target folder, which contains unit test results. The append=true makes sure that unit and integration tests are combined.
I managed to do it and it involves some tinkering with finicky stuff:
server/container needs to be on a separate jvm that can receive arguments (jacoco-agent). Cargo using embedded containers did not seem to work and was a pain to debug...
jvm with jacoco-it needs to stop before the jacoco analysis (duh!) but registering container-stop and jacoco-report on post-integration-test does not guarantee this... (the tcpdump, etc option in a previous answer had this problem)
defining random ports for the server/container makes this easy to integrate with continuous integration
phantomjs is an extra ;)
jacoco should be used as prepare-agent-integration and report-integration for integration-test (does not really make a difference)
Should be run as 'mvn clean verify'
Pom:
<plugin>
<groupId>org.jacoco</groupId>
<artifactId>jacoco-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>0.7.4.201502262128</version>
<executions>
<!-- unit test coverage -->
<execution>
<id>jacoco-pre-unit-test</id>
<goals>
<goal>prepare-agent</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<destFile>${project.build.directory}/coverage-reports/jacoco-ut.exec</destFile>
<propertyName>jacoco.ut.argLine</propertyName>
</configuration>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>jacoco-post-unit-test</id>
<phase>test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>report</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<dataFile>${project.build.directory}/coverage-reports/jacoco-ut.exec</dataFile>
<outputDirectory>${project.reporting.outputDirectory}/jacoco-ut</outputDirectory>
</configuration>
</execution>
<!-- integration test coverage -->
<execution>
<id>jacoco-pre-integration-test</id>
<phase>pre-integration-test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>prepare-agent-integration</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<destFile>${project.build.directory}/coverage-reports/jacoco-it.exec</destFile>
<propertyName>jacoco.it.argLine</propertyName>
</configuration>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>jacoco-post-integration-test</id>
<phase>post-integration-test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>report-integration</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<dataFile>${project.build.directory}/coverage-reports/jacoco-it.exec</dataFile>
<outputDirectory>${project.reporting.outputDirectory}/jacoco-it</outputDirectory>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
<artifactId>sonar-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.6</version>
</plugin>
<!-- Installs PhantomJS so it doesn't have to be pre-installed -->
<plugin>
<groupId>com.github.klieber</groupId>
<artifactId>phantomjs-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>0.4</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<!-- should be post-integration-test ? -->
<phase>test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>install</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
<configuration>
<version>1.9.7</version>
</configuration>
</plugin>
<!-- Get two free ports for our test server to use -->
<plugin>
<groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
<artifactId>build-helper-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.6</version>
<configuration>
<portNames>
<portName>jetty.port</portName>
<portName>jetty.port.stop</portName>
</portNames>
</configuration>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>reserve-port</id>
<phase>test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>reserve-network-port</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
<!-- Run tests (UT) -->
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.18.1</version>
<configuration>
<argLine>${jacoco.ut.argLine}</argLine>
<skipTests>${skip.unit.tests}</skipTests>
<testFailureIgnore>true</testFailureIgnore>
<excludes>
<!-- no UT execution, to test only IT
<exclude>**/<remove this>*Test.java</exclude> -->
</excludes>
</configuration>
</plugin>
<!-- Use failsafe to run our integration tests -->
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-failsafe-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.17</version>
<configuration>
<systemPropertyVariables>
<!-- pass these values to the test classes -->
<phantomjs.binary>${phantomjs.binary}</phantomjs.binary>
<jetty.port>${jetty.port}</jetty.port>
</systemPropertyVariables>
</configuration>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>integration-test</id>
<goals>
<goal>integration-test</goal>
<goal>verify</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.codehaus.cargo</groupId>
<artifactId>cargo-maven2-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.4.16</version>
<configuration>
<skip>${skipITs}</skip>
<container>
<containerId>tomcat8x</containerId>
<zipUrlInstaller>
<!-- did not work with 'https'. Certificate problem? -->
<url>http://archive.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.0.26/bin/apache-tomcat-8.0.26.zip</url>
<downloadDir>${project.build.directory}/downloads</downloadDir>
<extractDir>${project.build.directory}/extracts</extractDir>
</zipUrlInstaller>
</container>
<configuration>
<home>${project.build.directory}/catalina-base</home>
<properties>
<cargo.jvmargs>${jacoco.it.argLine}</cargo.jvmargs>
<cargo.servlet.port>${jetty.port}</cargo.servlet.port>
<!-- <cargo.logging>high</cargo.logging> -->
</properties>
</configuration>
</configuration>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>cargo-start-tomcat</id>
<phase>pre-integration-test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>start</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>cargo-stop-tomcat</id>
<phase>integration-test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>stop</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>

Jetty sealed javax.naming

I have a legacy application using struts 1 and torque. I have made an effort last week to refactor it a bit and tried to decouple some groups of classes and introduced unit tests. As I can not test all areas of the application through unit tests, I wanted to add HtmlUnit tests.
To to this, I added the maven-failsafe-plugin and jetty to my project, like so:
<build>
...
<plugins>
...
<plugin>
<artifactId>maven-failsafe-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.6</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<goals>
<goal>integration-test</goal>
<goal>verify</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.mortbay.jetty</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-jetty-plugin</artifactId>
<version>6.1.16</version>
<configuration>
<scanIntervalSeconds>10</scanIntervalSeconds>
<stopPort>8005</stopPort>
<stopKey>STOP</stopKey>
<contextPath>/</contextPath>
</configuration>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>start-jetty</id>
<phase>pre-integration-test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>run</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<scanIntervalSeconds>0</scanIntervalSeconds>
<daemon>true</daemon>
</configuration>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>stop-jetty</id>
<phase>post-integration-test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>stop</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
The problem is, that when I run mvn verify, I get the following exception:
java.lang.SecurityException: sealing violation: can't seal package javax.naming: already loaded
I am using javax.naming in some classes, but can't find any dependency that overrides javax.naming!
Does anybody have a clue about how to figure this problem out?

Categories