We Keep Coding

How to merge application.properties with application-default.properties and include in other test profiles with Spring Boot >2.4

We would like to merge src/main/resources/application.properties with additional default properties when running tests which in turn should be included by other (test) properties files activated via specific profiles in our Spring Boot application.
Up until Spring Boot 2.4 this worked quite well by having all common test properties in src/test/resources/application-default.properties to keep things DRY. Those were then automatically merged with the ones from src/main/resources/application.properties by Spring [1]. This allowed us to have our own set of default properties without requiring tests to specify an #ActiveProfiles("default").
Other (test) profiles could then have their own application-<profile>.properties with spring.profiles.include=default and then further extend the defaults.
With Spring Boot 2.4 I'm struggling with the new "rules":
I can no longer load application-default.properties from application-<profile>.properties since spring.profiles.include is no longer allowed in non profile-specific documents [2].
I don't want to introduce a src/test/resources/application.properties since I don't want to repeat everything from src/main/resources/application.properties. Also I don't want to load any activate any test-related profiles in the app's properties.
It looks like one solution could be to explicitly add spring.profiles.include=default to src/main/resources/application.properties to force the application to include the properties file with default properties which will work as before when it comes to running the actual application but consider src/test/resources/application-default.properties when running the tests.
Is this the way to go or are there smarter solutions to tackle this problem and still keep the properties free of redundancies?

spring.profiles.active=dev
add this config in application.properties file

Spring Boot properties that depend on profile-specific properties

I have a Spring Boot application which should connect to different servers in dev and prod, with many services running on those servers. To this point, I have created the configuration like this:
application.properties:
server.url.srv1=${server.url.base}/srv1
server.url.srv2=${server.url.base}/srv2
server.url.srv3=${server.url.base}/srv3
application-dev.properties:
server.url.base=http://192.168.86.17
application-prod.properties:
server.url.base=https://10.11.12.3
Yet when I initialize a bean argument with #Value("${server.url.srv1}"), I get a string of "${server.url.base}/srv1" and not "http://192.168.86.17/srv1" or "https://10.11.12.3/srv1" as expected.
Is this doable at all? It should be if the "${}" references are only resolved once all the config files are loaded, but this doesn't seem to be the case.
I have searched for an answer on both the Spring site, on Google (which pointed me to an otherwise useful Baeldung site), and here, but found nothing relevant to my particular question.

Placeholders in the application.properties should work. Please refer sample project I have added with your use case and it work as expected: https://github.com/itsprav/spring-profile-properties-using-placeholder

When you run your application you must have to set the specific spring-profile to be set in order to get the specific properties defined previously.
There is many ways to set these profiles.
Setting Profiles in different ways (JVM, Programmatically, Environment Variable...)

spring boot parent for jar file

I want to create a jar file that I can add to a classpath and will basically "plug-in" to an existing spring boot application. I need it to be able to have annotations of Component, ConfigurationProperties, and all the fun things that spring boot gives you, but I want it "thin" and it will be a jar file used as part of a full spring boot web application.
I need the jar file to be externally configurable. Property files will be different for different deployments. So having a working #Configuration annotation is critical.
I look at spring-boot-starter-parent, and that has jetty, tomcat, hibernate stuff and is a huge jar file. I don't want that.
Is there a "thin" parent?
Is spring boot simply not what I want here? And I should just use a regular spring project and set my "Main" spring boot web app to do component scans to configure the jar file?

It sounds like you are trying to define your own Spring Boot Starter. That's the real power that Spring Boot gives you, the ability to include a dependency and have it auto-configure itself.
By packaging your jar the right way, Spring Boot will detect that there are configurations, components, and property files automatically. I've used this in the past for the case where I want all of my applications to log a specific way, or enforce a certain format for my REST endpoints.
The documentation gives a very thorough overview of the steps you'll need to take. But essentially, you are going to package your jar like any other (with your #Bean, #Component, #Service, and #Configuration classes in it), and provide a property file pointing to the configurations:
// Example spring.factories file
org.springframework.boot.autoconfigure.EnableAutoConfiguration=\
com.mycorp.libx.autoconfigure.LibXAutoConfiguration,\
com.mycorp.libx.autoconfigure.LibXWebAutoConfiguration
Also check out the set of #ConditionalOn... annotations, they can really help with controlling what beans become active based on properties being defined, profiles being active, or dependencies being loaded.

Neo4j-ogm: How to use different configuration (ogm.properties/java configuration) depending on environment?

I've been using an embedded neo4j server in my project so far.
Now I want to try out the new bolt protocol with a standalone server, however only for my deployed application. For convenience, I still want to use an embedded database when running from IDE (permanent) or when running tests (impermanent).
In order to support this, I've migrated from the java based configuration to the use of a ogm.properties file. Depending on the environment I run in, I want to use the file which configures the respective driver/database location.
I have placed a default configuration in the root of my resources folder. However I am not able to "override" this in other environment.
In order to do that I placed a different ogm.properties in the root folder of the deployed application. This doesn't seem to work. This the mechanism that I previously already used in order to have different application.properties and logback.xml configurations.
Is this not supported by neo4j-ogm? If not, how can one achieve this? It also isn't (trivially) possible with the java based configuration.
I am a bit confused, since this doesn't sound like such an unlikely requirement...

You can use Spring Profile for this to configure different properties for different environments and you can look here.
You can use application.properties (spring.profiles.active) to load a different profile or by using a runtime argument if you are using Spring boot with CommandLineRunner.

Ease of rolling back from Spring Boot to regular Spring and viewing hybrid of Spring Context and configurations while using Spring Boot

I am assessing whether spring-boot and how I could migrate to using it.
One question I have is whether a project that uses spring boot can be converted easily back to a regular spring project which uses the traditional spring configuration files if that is required. This would be useful in my mind for a few reasons.
1) merging with legacy projects, because as I have read moving from legacy spring to spring-boot is somewhat tedious.
2) Obtaining a view of the spring application context file and webapp configuration files to understand what the actual configurations being used are.
Another question I have is regarding the lack of application-context file, is there a way to have some kind of hybrid where there is still an application-context file that can be seen? Part of my concern is that spring-boot auto configures components without us knowing and learning how they are configured and work together.

Spring Boot provides auto-configuration.
When #SpringBootApplication is encountered, it triggers a search of the CLASSPATH for a file called META-INF/spring.factories which is just a regular text file that enumerates a list of Java configuration classes. Java configuration was introduced in 2006 and then merged into Spring 3 in 2009. So it's been around for a long time. These Java configuration classes define beans in the same way that XML does. Each class is annotated with #Configuration and therein you find beans defined using methods (factory methods, or provider methods) whose return value is managed and exposed via Spring. Each such provider method is annotated with #Bean. This tells Spring to consider the method and its return value the definition of the bean.
Spring Boot tries to launch all the Java configurations it sees enumerated in that text file. It tries to launch RabbitAutoConfiguration.class, which in turn provides beans for connecting to RabbitMQ and so on. Of course, you don't want those beans in certain cases, so Spring Boot takes advantage of Spring framework 4's #Conditional mechanism to conditionally register those beans only if certain conditions are met: is a type on the CLASSPATH, is a property exposed through the environment, has there been another bean of the same type defined by the user, etc. Spring boot uses these to only create the RabbitMQ-specific beans if, for example, the dependencies that you would get from org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-amqp are on the CLASSPATH. It also considers that the user may have provided a different implementation of RabbitTemplate in some othe rbean definition (be it XML or Java configuration) so it uses that if it's there.
These java configuration classes are the same sort of Java configuration classes you would write without Spring Boot. BUT... WHY? 80% of the time, the auto-configuration that Spring Boot provides is going to be as good or better than the configuration you would write yourself. There are only so many ways to configure Spring MVC, Spring Data, Spring Batch, etc., and the wager you take using Spring Boot is that the leaders and engineers on those various projects can provide the most sensible 80%-case configuration that you probably don't care to write, anyway.
So, yes you could use Spring Boot with existing applications, but you'd have to move those existing applications to Spring 4 (which is easy to do if you're using the spring-boot-starter-* dependencies) to take advantage of #Conditional. Spring Boot prefers: NO configuration, Java configuration, XML configuration, in that order.
If you have an existing application, I'd do the following:
find out what dependencies you can remove from your Gradle/Maven build and just have taken care of for you with the various spring-boot-starter- dependencies.
add #SpringBootApplication to a root component class. Eg, if your package is a.b.c, put a class Application in a.Application and annotate that with #SpringBootApplication
You can run it as a Servlet 3 application or in an embedded servlet container. It might be easier to just run in a standard servlet container as you take baby steps. Go to http://start.spring.io and make sure to choose war in the packaging drop down. Copy the ServletInitializer class and the specification from the pom.xml to ensure that your application is a .war, not a .jar. Then, once everything works on Spring Boot, rm -rf the Initializer and then revert the Maven build to a simpler .jar using the Spring Boot plugin for extra win.
If your application has lots of existing configuration, import it using #Import(OldConfig.class) or #ImportResource("old-config.xml") on the a.Application configuration class. The auto-configuration will kick in but it will see, for example, that you may have already defined a DataSource so it'll plug that in in the right places. What I like to do now is just start the application up, see if everything's OK, then start removing code in my old Java or XML configuration. Don't remove your business code, but remove things related to turning on parts of Spring. Anything that looks like #Enable..* or ..:annotation-driven/>. Restart and verify things still work. The goal is to let Spring Boot do as much of the heavy lifting as possible. Viewing the source is very handy here so you can see what Spring Boot will try to do for you. Spring Boot will log information on what #Conditional conditions evaluated to true for you. Simply provide --Ddebug=true wen you start the application to see the output. You could also export DEBUG=true then restart your IDE to run it as long as the environment variable is ivsible in your shell.