I have an application where I want to have a method that creates a string of a specified size in bytes.
here's what I basically wrote. I just want to make sure that this produces for example a string of size bytes
static String createMsg(int size){
byte[] msgB= new byte[size];
for(int i = 0; i < size; i++){
msgB[i] = 105;
}
String x = new String(msgB);
return x;
}
Thank you.
To create a string of a specific size in byte, you must create a string only containing ASCII characters. All characters between 0x0 (0) and 0x7F (127) are ASCII characters and each ASCII character takes one byte. It takes even one byte, if our encoding is UTF, as the first 128 characters in UTF and ASCII are the same for compatiblity reasons.
You can also rely on Apache Commons 3 and use this code snippet to generate a string of a specific size.
RandomStringUtils.randomAscii(100);
Related
I've been suggested a TCP-like checksum, which consists of the sum of the (integer) sequence and ack field values, added to a character-by-character sum of the payload field of the packet (i.e., treat each character as if it were an 8 bit integer and just add them together).
I'm assuming it would go along the lines of:
char[] a = data.toCharArray();
for (int i = 0; int < len; i++) {
...
}
Though I'm pretty clueless as to how I could complete the actual conversion?
My data is string, and I wish to go through the string (converted to a char array (though if there's a better way to do this let me know!)) and now I'm ready to iterate though how does one convert each character to an int. I will then be summing the total.
As String contains Unicode, and char is a two-byte UTF-16 implementation of Unicode, it might be better to first convert the String to bytes:
byte[] bytes = data.getBytes(StandardCharsets.UTF_8);
data = new String(bytes, StandardCharsets.UTF_8); // Inverse.
int crc = 0;
for (byte b : bytes) {
int n = b & 0xFF; // An int 0 .. 255 without sign extension
crc ^= n;
}
Now you can handle any Unicode content of a String. UTF-8 is optimal when sufficient ASCII letters are used, like Chinese HTML pages. (For a Chinese plain text UTF-16 might be better.)
based on this array :
final char[] charValue = { 'u', ' ', '}','+' };
i want to print the double value and the ascii value from it in Java.
i can't find a proper solution for that in internet. I just found how to convert a single Character into Integer value. But what about many characters?
the main problem is, i have a large char[] and some double and int values are stored in. for double values they are stored within 4 bytes size and integer 1 or 2 bytes so i have to read all this and convert into double or integer.
Thanks for you help
When java was designed, there was C char being used for binary bytes and text.
Java made a clear separation between binary data (byte[], InputStream/OutputStream) and Unicode text (char, String, Reader/Writer). Hence Java has full Unicode support. The binary data, byte[], need information: their used encoding, in order to be convertable to text: char[]/String.
In Java a char[] will rarely be used (as in C/C++), and it seems byte[] is intended, as you mention 4 elements to be used for an int etcetera. A char is 16 bits, containing UTF-16 text.
For this case one can use a ByteBuffer either wrapping a byte[] or being taken from a memory mapped file.
Writing
ByteBuffer buf = ByteBuffer.allocate(13); // 13 bytes
buf.order(ByteOrder.LITTLE_ENDIAN); // Intel order
buf.putInt(42); // at 0
buf.putDouble(Math.PI); // at 4
buf.put((byte) '0'); // at 12
buf.putDouble(4, 3.0); // at 4 overwrite PI
byte[] bytes = buf.array();
Reading
ByteBuffer buf = ByteBuffer.wrap(bytes);
buf.order(ByteOrder.LITTLE_ENDIAN); // Intel order
int a = buf.getInt();
double b = buf.getDouble();
byte c = buf.get();
I'm writing a Simplified DES algorithm to encrypt and subsequently decrypt a string. Suppose I have the initial character ( which has the binary value 00101000 which I get using the following algorithm:
public void getBinary() throws UnsupportedEncodingException {
byte[] plaintextBinary = text.getBytes("UTF-8");
for(byte b : plaintextBinary){
int val = b;
int[] tempBinRep = new int[8];
for(int i = 0; i<8; i++){
tempBinRep[i] = (val & 128) == 0 ? 0 : 1;
val <<= 1;
}
binaryRepresentations.add(tempBinRep);
}
}
After I perform the various permutations and shifts, ( and it's binary equivalent is transformed into 10001010 and it's ASCII equivalent Š. When I come around to decryption I pass the same character through the getBinary() method I now get the binary string 11000010 and another binary string 10001010 which translates into ASCII as x(.
Where is this rogue x coming from?
Edit: The full class can be found here.
You haven't supplied the decrypting code, so we can't know for sure, but I would guess you missed the encoding either when populating your String. Java Strings are encoded in UTF-16 by default. Since you're forcing UTF-8 when encrypting, I'm assuming you're doing the same when decrypting. The problem is, when you convert your encrypted bytes to a String for storage, if you let it default to UTF-16, you're probably ending up with a two-byte character because the 10001010 is 138, which is beyond the 127 range for ASCII charaters that get represented with a single byte.
So the "x" you're getting is the byte for the code page, followed by the actual character's byte. As suggested in the comments, you'd do better to just store the encrypted bytes as bytes, and not convert them to Strings until they're decrypted.
Because MySQL 5.1 does not support 4 byte UTF-8 sequences, I need to replace/drop the 4 byte sequences in these strings.
I'm looking a clean way to replace these characters.
Apache libraries are replacing the characters with a question-mark is fine for this case, although ASCII equivalent would be nicer, of course.
N.B. The input is from external sources (e-mail names) and upgrading the database is not a solution at this point in time.
We ended up implementing the following method in Java for this problem.
Basicaly replacing the characters with a higher codepoint then the last 3byte UTF-8 char.
The offset calculations are to make sure we stay on the unicode code points.
public static final String LAST_3_BYTE_UTF_CHAR = "\uFFFF";
public static final String REPLACEMENT_CHAR = "\uFFFD";
public static String toValid3ByteUTF8String(String s) {
final int length = s.length();
StringBuilder b = new StringBuilder(length);
for (int offset = 0; offset < length; ) {
final int codepoint = s.codePointAt(offset);
// do something with the codepoint
if (codepoint > CharUtils.LAST_3_BYTE_UTF_CHAR.codePointAt(0)) {
b.append(CharUtils.REPLACEMENT_CHAR);
} else {
if (Character.isValidCodePoint(codepoint)) {
b.appendCodePoint(codepoint);
} else {
b.append(CharUtils.REPLACEMENT_CHAR);
}
}
offset += Character.charCount(codepoint);
}
return b.toString();
}
Another simple solution is to use regular expression [^\u0000-\uFFFF]. For example in java:
text.replaceAll("[^\\u0000-\\uFFFF]", "\uFFFD");
5 byte utf-8 sequences begin with a 111110xx-byte and 6 byte utf-8 sequences begin with a 1111110x-byte. Important to note is, that no follow-up bytes of 1-4-byte utf-8 sequences contain bytes that large because follow-up bytes are always of the form 10xxxxxx.
Therefore you can just go through the bytes and every time you see a byte of kind 111110xx then only emit a '?' to the output-stream/array while skipping the next 4 bytes from the input; analogue for the 6-byte-sequences.
I am new to java but I am very fluent in C++ and C# especially C#. I know how to do xor encryption in both C# and C++. The problem is the algorithm I wrote in Java to implement xor encryption seems to be producing wrong results. The results are usually a bunch of spaces and I am sure that is wrong. Here is the class below:
public final class Encrypter {
public static String EncryptString(String input, String key)
{
int length;
int index = 0, index2 = 0;
byte[] ibytes = input.getBytes();
byte[] kbytes = key.getBytes();
length = kbytes.length;
char[] output = new char[ibytes.length];
for(byte b : ibytes)
{
if (index == length)
{
index = 0;
}
int val = (b ^ kbytes[index]);
output[index2] = (char)val;
index++;
index2++;
}
return new String(output);
}
public static String DecryptString(String input, String key)
{
int length;
int index = 0, index2 = 0;
byte[] ibytes = input.getBytes();
byte[] kbytes = key.getBytes();
length = kbytes.length;
char[] output = new char[ibytes.length];
for(byte b : ibytes)
{
if (index == length)
{
index = 0;
}
int val = (b ^ kbytes[index]);
output[index2] = (char)val;
index++;
index2++;
}
return new String(output);
}
}
Strings in Java are Unicode - and Unicode strings are not general holders for bytes like ASCII strings can be.
You're taking a string and converting it to bytes without specifying what character encoding you want, so you're getting the platform default encoding - probably US-ASCII, UTF-8 or one of the Windows code pages.
Then you're preforming arithmetic/logic operations on these bytes. (I haven't looked at what you're doing here - you say you know the algorithm.)
Finally, you're taking these transformed bytes and trying to turn them back into a string - that is, back into characters. Again, you haven't specified the character encoding (but you'll get the same as you got converting characters to bytes, so that's OK), but, most importantly...
Unless your platform default encoding uses a single byte per character (e.g. US-ASCII), then not all of the byte sequences you will generate represent valid characters.
So, two pieces of advice come from this:
Don't use strings as general holders for bytes
Always specify a character encoding when converting between bytes and characters.
In this case, you might have more success if you specifically give US-ASCII as the encoding. EDIT: This last sentence is not true (see comments below). Refer back to point 1 above! Use bytes, not characters, when you want bytes.
If you use non-ascii strings as keys you'll get pretty strange results. The bytes in the kbytes array will be negative. Sign-extension then means that val will come out negative. The cast to char will then produce a character in the FF80-FFFF range.
These characters will certainly not be printable, and depending on what you use to check the output you may be shown "box" or some other replacement characters.