java string literal and new operator [duplicate] - java

I know the concept of a constants pool and the String constant pool used by JVMs to handle String literals. But I don't know which type of memory is used by the JVM to store String constant literals. The stack or the heap? Since its a literal which is not associated with any instance I would assume that it will be stored in stack. But if it's not referred by any instance the literal has to be collected by GC run (correct me if I am wrong), so how is that handled if it is stored in the stack?

The answer is technically neither. According to the Java Virtual Machine Specification, the area for storing string literals is in the runtime constant pool. The runtime constant pool memory area is allocated on a per-class or per-interface basis, so it's not tied to any object instances at all. The runtime constant pool is a subset of the method area which "stores per-class structures such as the runtime constant pool, field and method data, and the code for methods and constructors, including the special methods used in class and instance initialization and interface type initialization". The VM spec says that although the method area is logically part of the heap, it doesn't dictate that memory allocated in the method area be subject to garbage collection or other behaviors that would be associated with normal data structures allocated to the heap.

As explained by this answer, the exact location of the string pool is not specified and can vary from one JVM implementation to another.
It is interesting to note that until Java 7, the pool was in the permgen space of the heap on hotspot JVM but it has been moved to the main part of the heap since Java 7:
Area: HotSpot
Synopsis: In JDK 7, interned strings are no longer allocated in the permanent generation of the Java heap, but are instead allocated in the main part of the Java heap (known as the young and old generations), along with the other objects created by the application. This change will result in more data residing in the main Java heap, and less data in the permanent generation, and thus may require heap sizes to be adjusted. Most applications will see only relatively small differences in heap usage due to this change, but larger applications that load many classes or make heavy use of the String.intern() method will see more significant differences.
RFE: 6962931
And in Java 8 Hotspot, Permanent Generation has been completely removed.

String literals are not stored on the stack. Never. In fact, no objects are stored on the stack.
String literals (or more accurately, the String objects that represent them) are were historically stored in a Heap called the "permgen" heap. (Permgen is short for permanent generation.)
Under normal circumstances, String literals and much of the other stuff in the permgen heap are "permanently" reachable, and are not garbage collected. (For instance, String literals are always reachable from the code objects that use them.) However, you can configure a JVM to attempt to find and collect dynamically loaded classes that are no longer needed, and this may cause String literals to be garbage collected.
CLARIFICATION #1 - I'm not saying that Permgen doesn't get GC'ed. It does, typically when the JVM decides to run a Full GC. My point is that String literals will be reachable as long as the code that uses them is reachable, and the code will be reachable as long as the code's classloader is reachable, and for the default classloaders, that means "for ever".
CLARIFICATION #2 - In fact, Java 7 and later uses the regular heap to hold the string pool. Thus, String objects that represent String literals and intern'd strings are actually in the regular heap. (See #assylias's Answer for details.)
But I am still trying to find out thin line between storage of string literal and string created with new.
There is no "thin line". It is really very simple:
String objects that represent / correspond to string literals are held in the string pool.
String objects that were created by a String::intern call are held in the string pool.
All other String objects are NOT held in the string pool.
Then there is the separate question of where the string pool is "stored". Prior to Java 7 it was the permgen heap. From Java 7 onwards it is the main heap.

String pooling
String pooling (sometimes also called as string canonicalisation) is a
process of replacing several String objects with equal value but
different identity with a single shared String object. You can achieve
this goal by keeping your own Map (with possibly soft
or weak references depending on your requirements) and using map
values as canonicalised values. Or you can use String.intern() method
which is provided to you by JDK.
At times of Java 6 using String.intern() was forbidden by many
standards due to a high possibility to get an OutOfMemoryException if
pooling went out of control. Oracle Java 7 implementation of string
pooling was changed considerably. You can look for details in
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6962931 and
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6962930.
String.intern() in Java 6
In those good old days all interned strings were stored in the PermGen
– the fixed size part of heap mainly used for storing loaded classes
and string pool. Besides explicitly interned strings, PermGen string
pool also contained all literal strings earlier used in your program
(the important word here is used – if a class or method was never
loaded/called, any constants defined in it will not be loaded).
The biggest issue with such string pool in Java 6 was its location –
the PermGen. PermGen has a fixed size and can not be expanded at
runtime. You can set it using -XX:MaxPermSize=96m option. As far as I
know, the default PermGen size varies between 32M and 96M depending on
the platform. You can increase its size, but its size will still be
fixed. Such limitation required very careful usage of String.intern –
you’d better not intern any uncontrolled user input using this method.
That’s why string pooling at times of Java 6 was mostly implemented in
the manually managed maps.
String.intern() in Java 7
Oracle engineers made an extremely important change to the string
pooling logic in Java 7 – the string pool was relocated to the heap.
It means that you are no longer limited by a separate fixed size
memory area. All strings are now located in the heap, as most of other
ordinary objects, which allows you to manage only the heap size while
tuning your application. Technically, this alone could be a sufficient
reason to reconsider using String.intern() in your Java 7 programs.
But there are other reasons.
String pool values are garbage collected
Yes, all strings in the JVM string pool are eligible for garbage
collection if there are no references to them from your program roots.
It applies to all discussed versions of Java. It means that if your
interned string went out of scope and there are no other references to
it – it will be garbage collected from the JVM string pool.
Being eligible for garbage collection and residing in the heap, a JVM
string pool seems to be a right place for all your strings, isn’t it?
In theory it is true – non-used strings will be garbage collected from
the pool, used strings will allow you to save memory in case then you
get an equal string from the input. Seems to be a perfect memory
saving strategy? Nearly so. You must know how the string pool is
implemented before making any decisions.
source.

As other answers explain Memory in Java is divided into two portions
1. Stack: One stack is created per thread and it stores stack frames which again stores local variables and if a variable is a reference type then that variable refers to a memory location in heap for the actual object.
2. Heap: All kinds of objects will be created in heap only.
Heap memory is again divided into 3 portions
1. Young Generation: Stores objects which have a short life, Young Generation itself can be divided into two categories Eden Space and Survivor Space.
2. Old Generation: Store objects which have survived many garbage collection cycles and still being referenced.
3. Permanent Generation: Stores metadata about the program e.g. runtime constant pool.
String constant pool belongs to the permanent generation area of Heap memory.
We can see the runtime constant pool for our code in the bytecode by using javap -verbose class_name which will show us method references (#Methodref), Class objects ( #Class ), string literals ( #String )
You can read more about it on my article How Does JVM Handle Method Overloading and Overriding Internally.

To the great answers that already included here I want to add something that missing in my perspective - an illustration.
As you already JVM divides the allocated memory to a Java program into two parts. one is stack and another one is heap. Stack is used for execution purpose and heap is used for storage purpose. In that heap memory, JVM allocates some memory specially meant for string literals. This part of the heap memory is called string constants pool.
So for example, if you init the following objects:
String s1 = "abc";
String s2 = "123";
String obj1 = new String("abc");
String obj2 = new String("def");
String obj3 = new String("456);
String literals s1 and s2 will go to string constant pool, objects obj1, obj2, obj3 to the heap. All of them, will be referenced from the Stack.
Also, please note that "abc" will appear in heap and in string constant pool. Why is String s1 = "abc" and String obj1 = new String("abc") will be created this way? It's because String obj1 = new String("abc") explicitly creates a new and referentially distinct instance of a String object and String s1 = "abc" may reuse an instance from the string constant pool if one is available. For a more elaborate explanation: https://stackoverflow.com/a/3298542/2811258

Related

String pool - do String always exist in constant pool?

When string is created by using literal, it gets stored in pool. But when new operator is used to create String object, it stores the object in Heap.
But is the object in heap just a pointer to literal stored in pool or is it a simple String object stored in heap which is eligible for GC?
Terminology:
The Constant Pool is an area in (each) .class file that contains various constants, including strings. No runtime objects exist in the constant pool. It is a region of a file.
The String Pool is a runtime data structure used by the JVM to manage certain kinds of strings. (Specifically, String objects that correspond to literals, and String objects added to the pool by String::intern().)
Your question is actually talking about the String Pool, not the Constant Pool.
To answer your questions:
String pool - do String always exist in constant pool?
No. A string object created using new String() doesn't exist in either the string pool or the constant pool.
When string is created by using literal, it gets stored in pool.
The string (already!) exists the constant pool and gets created as a Java String object in the string pool. (The actual creation can be at class load time, or when the literal is first used. This depends on the Java implementation.)
But when new operator is used to create String object, it stores the object in Heap.
Yes. But the string pool is also part of the Heap. Like I said, it is a data structure, not a region of storage.
(In the old days, the string pool lived in a special heap called the PermGen heap. But PermGen was replaced with something else (MetaSpace), and the string pool doesn't use either ... anymore.
But is the object in heap just a pointer to literal stored in pool or is it a simple String object stored in heap which is eligible for GC?
This is really confused.
All strings are represented as String objects in the (a) heap. That includes strings in the string pool. Even when the string pool was in PermGen.
All String objects that are unreachable are eligible for garbage collection. Even for strings in the string pool. Even for String objects that represent string literals.
But ... wait ... so can string literals be garbage collected?
Yes!! If a String object that represents a string literal becomes unreachable at runtime it is eligible for garbage collection, just like any other String object.
A string literal can become unreachable if the code object(s) that use the literal become unreachable. It can happen, when a classloader becomes unreachable.
And yes, PermGen was garbage collected. At least since JDK 1.2. (IIRC Java 1.0 and maybe 1.1 didn't implement GC for the PermGen heap. But that was fixed a long time ago.)

How can I destroy reference from String pool in Java?

Strings are immutable. When I declare:
String a = "abc";
String a1 = "abc";
Both objects refer to same location. So how can I destroy this "abc" reference from String pool?
My use case is that I am developing a hardware application with less memory and for this, I need to clear the references from String pool to save memory.
No, typically you can not "destroy reference from String pool in Java" manually.
The main reason I suppose why you are targeting it is to avoid out of memory errors. In Java 6 days all interned strings were stored in the PermGen – the fixed size part of heap mainly used for storing loaded classes and string pool. Besides explicitly interned strings, PermGen string pool also contained all literal strings earlier used in your program. The biggest issue with string pool in Java 6 was its location – the PermGen. PermGen has a fixed size and can not be expanded at runtime. You can set it using -XX:MaxPermSize=N option. This would lead to memory leaks and out of memory errors.
In Java 7 – the string pool was relocated to the heap. It means that you are no longer limited by a separate fixed size memory area. All strings are now located in the heap, as most of other ordinary objects.
You may also increase the string pool size by configuring -XX:StringTableSize=N.
If you are not sure about the string pool usage, try -XX:+PrintStringTableStatistics JVM argument. It will print you the string pool usage when your program terminates.
In JDK, there is also a tool named jmap which can be used to find out number of interned strings in your application.
jmap -heap process_id
Eg:
jmap -heap 18974
Along with other output, this command also outputs number of interned strings and the space they occupy "xxxxxx interned Strings occupying xxxxxx bytes."
The rules for garbage collection of objects in the String pool are the same as for other Strings or any other object. But the fact that the String objects that correspond to String literals mostly are always reachable since there is an implicit reference to the string object in the code of every method that uses the literal and so typically they are not candidates for garbage collection.
However, this is not always the case. If the literal was defined in a class that was dynamically loaded (e.g. using Class.forName(...)), then it is possible to arrange that the class is unloaded. If that happens, then the String object for the literal will be unreachable, and will be reclaimed when the heap containing the interned String gets GC'ed.

Memory area for Static methods in java [duplicate]

For example:
class A {
static int i=0;
static int j;
static void method() {
// static k=0; can't use static for local variables only final is permitted
// static int L;
}
}
Where will these variables be stored in Java, in heap or in stack memory? How are they stored?
Static methods (in fact all methods) as well as static variables are stored in the PermGen section of the heap, since they are part of the reflection data (class related data, not instance related). As of Java 8 PermGen has been replaced by MetaSpace and as per JEP 122 it only holds meta-data while static fields are stored in the heap.
Note that this mostly applies to Oracle's Hotspot JVM and others that are based on it. However, not every JVM has PermGen or Metaspace like Eclipse OpenJ9.
Update for clarification:
Note that only the variables and their technical values (primitives or references) are stored in PermGen space.
If your static variable is a reference to an object that object itself is stored in the normal sections of the heap (young/old generation or survivor space). Those objects (unless they are internal objects like classes etc.) are not stored in PermGen space.
Example:
static int i = 1; //the value 1 is stored in the PermGen section
static Object o = new SomeObject(); //the reference(pointer/memory address) is stored in the PermGen section, the object itself is not.
A word on garbage collection:
Do not rely on finalize() as it's not guaranteed to run. It is totally up to the JVM to decide when to run the garbage collector and what to collect, even if an object is eligible for garbage collection.
Of course you can set a static variable to null and thus remove the reference to the object on the heap but that doesn't mean the garbage collector will collect it (even if there are no more references).
Additionally finalize() is run only once, so you have to make sure it doesn't throw exceptions or otherwise prevent the object to be collected. If you halt finalization through some exception, finalize() won't be invoked on the same object a second time.
A final note: how code, runtime data etc. are stored depends on the JVM which is used, i.e. HotSpot might do it differently than JRockit and this might even differ between versions of the same JVM. The above is based on HotSpot for Java 5 and 6 (those are basically the same) since at the time of answering I'd say that most people used those JVMs. Due to major changes in the memory model as of Java 8, the statements above might not be true for Java 8 HotSpot - and I didn't check the changes of Java 7 HotSpot, so I guess the above is still true for that version, but I'm not sure here.
Prior to Java 8:
The static variables were stored in the permgen space(also called the method area).
PermGen Space is also known as Method Area
PermGen Space used to store 3 things
Class level data (meta-data)
interned strings
static variables
From Java 8 onwards
The static variables are stored in the Heap itself.From Java 8 onwards the PermGen Space have been removed and new space named as MetaSpace is introduced which is not the part of Heap any more unlike the previous Permgen Space. Meta-Space is present on the native memory (memory provided by the OS to a particular Application for its own usage) and it now only stores the class meta-data.
The interned strings and static variables are moved into the heap itself.
For official information refer : JEP 122:Remove the Permanent Gen Space
Class variables(Static variables) are stored as part of the Class object associated with that class. This Class object can only be created by JVM and is stored in permanent generation.
Also some have answered that it is stored in non heap area which is called Method Area. Even this answer is not wrong. It is just a debatable topic whether Permgen Area is a part of heap or not. Obviously perceptions differ from person to person. In my opinion we provide heap space and permgen space differently in JVM arguments. So it is a good assumption to treat them differently.
Another way to see it
Memory pools are created by JVM memory managers during runtime. Memory pool may belong to either heap or non-heap memory.A run time constant pool is a per-class or per-interface run time representation of the constant_pool table in a class file. Each runtime constant pool is allocated from the Java virtual machine’s method area and Static Variables are stored in this Method Area.
Also this non-heap is nothing but perm gen area.Actually Method area is part of perm gen.(Reference)
This is a question with a simple answer and a long-winded answer.
The simple answer is the heap. Classes and all of the data applying to classes (not instance data) is stored in the Permanent Generation section of the heap.
The long answer is already on stack overflow:
There is a thorough description of memory and garbage collection in the JVM as well as an answer that talks more concisely about it.
It is stored in the heap referenced by the class definition. If you think about it, it has nothing to do with stack because there is no scope.
In addition to the Thomas's answer , static variable are stored in non heap area which is called Method Area.
As static variables are class level variables, they will store " permanent generation " of heap memory.
Please look into this for more details of JVM. Hoping this will be helpful
static variables are stored in the heap
When we create a static variable or method it is stored in the special area on heap: PermGen(Permanent Generation), where it lays down with all the data applying to classes(non-instance data). Starting from Java 8 the PermGen became - Metaspace. The difference is that Metaspace is auto-growing space, while PermGen has a fixed Max size, and this space is shared among all of the instances. Plus the Metaspace is a part of a Native Memory and not JVM Memory.
You can look into this for more details.
In real world or project we have requirement in advance and needs to create variable and methods inside the class , On the basis of requirement we needs to decide whether we needs to create
Local ( create n access within block or method constructor)
Static,
Instance Variable( every object has its own copy of it),
=>2. Static Keyword will be used with variable which will going to be same for particular class throughout for all objects,
e.g in selenium : we decalre webDriver as static => so we do not need to create webdriver again and again for every test case
Static Webdriver driver
(but parallel execution it will cause problem, but thats another case);
Real world scenario => If India is class, then flag, money would be same for every Indian, so we might take them as static.
Another example: utility method we always declare as static b'cos it will be used in different test cases.
Static stored in CMA( PreGen space)=PreGen (Fixed memory)changed to Metaspace after Java8 as now its growing dynamically
As of Java 8 , PermGen space is Obsolete. Static Methods,Primitives and Reference Variables are stored in Java MetaSpace. The actual objects reside in the JAVA heap. Since static methods never get out of reference they are never Garbage collected both from MetaSpace and the HEAP.

Garbage collection of String literals

I am reading about Garbage collection and i am getting confusing search results when i search for String literal garbage collections.
I need clarification on following points:
If a string is defined as literal at compile time [e.g: String str = "java"] then will it be garbage collected?
If use intern method [e.g: String str = new String("java").intern()] then will it be garbage collected? Also will it be treated differently from String literal in point 1.
Some places it is mentioned that literals will be garbage collected only when String class will be unloaded? Does it make sense because I don't think String class will ever be unloaded.
If a string is defined as literal at compile time [e.g: String str = "java";] then will it be garbage collected?
Probably not. The code objects will contain one or more references to the String objects that represent the literals. So as long as the code objects are reachable, the String objects will be to.
It is possible for code objects to become unreachable, but only if they were dynamically loaded ... and their classloader is destroyed.
If I use the intern method [e.g: String str = new String("java").intern()] then will it be garbage collected?
The object returned by the intern call will be the same object that represents the "java" string literal. (The "java" literal is interned at class loading time. When you then intern the newly constructed String object in your code snippet, it will lookup and return the previously interned "java" string.)
However, interned strings that are not identical with string literals can be garbage collected once they become unreachable. The PermGen space is garbage collected on all recent HotSpot JVMs. (Prior to Java 8 ... which drops PermGen entirely.)
Also will it be treated differently from string literal in point 1.
No ... because it is the same object as the string literal.
And indeed, once you understand what is going on, it is clear that string literals are not treated specially either. It is just an application of the "reachability" rule ...
Some places it is mentioned that literals will be garbage collected only when String class will be unloaded? Does it make sense because I don't think the String class will ever be unloaded.
You are right. It doesn't make sense. The sources that said that are incorrect. (It would be helpful if you posted a URL so that we can read what they are saying for ourselves ...)
Under normal circumstances, string literals and classes are all allocated into the JVM's permanent generation ("PermGen"), and usually won't ever be collected. Strings that are interned (e.g. mystring.intern()) are stored in a memory pool owned by the String class in permgen, and it was once the case that aggressive interning could cause a space leak because the string pool itself held a reference to every string, even if no other references existed. Apparently this is no longer true, at least as of JDK 1.6 (see, e.g., here).
For more on permgen, this is a decent overview of the topic. (Note: that link goes to a blog associated with a product. I don't have any association with the blog, the company, or the product, but the blog entry is useful and doesn't have much to do with the product.)
The literal string will remain in memory as long as the program is in memory.
str will be garbage collected, but the literal it is created from will not.
That makes perfect sense, since the string class is unloaded when the program is unloaded.
intern() method checks the availability of the object in String pool. If the object/literal is available then reference of it will be returned. If the literal is not there in the pool then object is loaded in the perm area (String pool) and then reference to it will be return. We have to use intern() method judiciously.

Where does Java's String constant pool live, the heap or the stack?

I know the concept of a constants pool and the String constant pool used by JVMs to handle String literals. But I don't know which type of memory is used by the JVM to store String constant literals. The stack or the heap? Since its a literal which is not associated with any instance I would assume that it will be stored in stack. But if it's not referred by any instance the literal has to be collected by GC run (correct me if I am wrong), so how is that handled if it is stored in the stack?
The answer is technically neither. According to the Java Virtual Machine Specification, the area for storing string literals is in the runtime constant pool. The runtime constant pool memory area is allocated on a per-class or per-interface basis, so it's not tied to any object instances at all. The runtime constant pool is a subset of the method area which "stores per-class structures such as the runtime constant pool, field and method data, and the code for methods and constructors, including the special methods used in class and instance initialization and interface type initialization". The VM spec says that although the method area is logically part of the heap, it doesn't dictate that memory allocated in the method area be subject to garbage collection or other behaviors that would be associated with normal data structures allocated to the heap.
As explained by this answer, the exact location of the string pool is not specified and can vary from one JVM implementation to another.
It is interesting to note that until Java 7, the pool was in the permgen space of the heap on hotspot JVM but it has been moved to the main part of the heap since Java 7:
Area: HotSpot
Synopsis: In JDK 7, interned strings are no longer allocated in the permanent generation of the Java heap, but are instead allocated in the main part of the Java heap (known as the young and old generations), along with the other objects created by the application. This change will result in more data residing in the main Java heap, and less data in the permanent generation, and thus may require heap sizes to be adjusted. Most applications will see only relatively small differences in heap usage due to this change, but larger applications that load many classes or make heavy use of the String.intern() method will see more significant differences.
RFE: 6962931
And in Java 8 Hotspot, Permanent Generation has been completely removed.
String literals are not stored on the stack. Never. In fact, no objects are stored on the stack.
String literals (or more accurately, the String objects that represent them) are were historically stored in a Heap called the "permgen" heap. (Permgen is short for permanent generation.)
Under normal circumstances, String literals and much of the other stuff in the permgen heap are "permanently" reachable, and are not garbage collected. (For instance, String literals are always reachable from the code objects that use them.) However, you can configure a JVM to attempt to find and collect dynamically loaded classes that are no longer needed, and this may cause String literals to be garbage collected.
CLARIFICATION #1 - I'm not saying that Permgen doesn't get GC'ed. It does, typically when the JVM decides to run a Full GC. My point is that String literals will be reachable as long as the code that uses them is reachable, and the code will be reachable as long as the code's classloader is reachable, and for the default classloaders, that means "for ever".
CLARIFICATION #2 - In fact, Java 7 and later uses the regular heap to hold the string pool. Thus, String objects that represent String literals and intern'd strings are actually in the regular heap. (See #assylias's Answer for details.)
But I am still trying to find out thin line between storage of string literal and string created with new.
There is no "thin line". It is really very simple:
String objects that represent / correspond to string literals are held in the string pool.
String objects that were created by a String::intern call are held in the string pool.
All other String objects are NOT held in the string pool.
Then there is the separate question of where the string pool is "stored". Prior to Java 7 it was the permgen heap. From Java 7 onwards it is the main heap.
String pooling
String pooling (sometimes also called as string canonicalisation) is a
process of replacing several String objects with equal value but
different identity with a single shared String object. You can achieve
this goal by keeping your own Map (with possibly soft
or weak references depending on your requirements) and using map
values as canonicalised values. Or you can use String.intern() method
which is provided to you by JDK.
At times of Java 6 using String.intern() was forbidden by many
standards due to a high possibility to get an OutOfMemoryException if
pooling went out of control. Oracle Java 7 implementation of string
pooling was changed considerably. You can look for details in
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6962931 and
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6962930.
String.intern() in Java 6
In those good old days all interned strings were stored in the PermGen
– the fixed size part of heap mainly used for storing loaded classes
and string pool. Besides explicitly interned strings, PermGen string
pool also contained all literal strings earlier used in your program
(the important word here is used – if a class or method was never
loaded/called, any constants defined in it will not be loaded).
The biggest issue with such string pool in Java 6 was its location –
the PermGen. PermGen has a fixed size and can not be expanded at
runtime. You can set it using -XX:MaxPermSize=96m option. As far as I
know, the default PermGen size varies between 32M and 96M depending on
the platform. You can increase its size, but its size will still be
fixed. Such limitation required very careful usage of String.intern –
you’d better not intern any uncontrolled user input using this method.
That’s why string pooling at times of Java 6 was mostly implemented in
the manually managed maps.
String.intern() in Java 7
Oracle engineers made an extremely important change to the string
pooling logic in Java 7 – the string pool was relocated to the heap.
It means that you are no longer limited by a separate fixed size
memory area. All strings are now located in the heap, as most of other
ordinary objects, which allows you to manage only the heap size while
tuning your application. Technically, this alone could be a sufficient
reason to reconsider using String.intern() in your Java 7 programs.
But there are other reasons.
String pool values are garbage collected
Yes, all strings in the JVM string pool are eligible for garbage
collection if there are no references to them from your program roots.
It applies to all discussed versions of Java. It means that if your
interned string went out of scope and there are no other references to
it – it will be garbage collected from the JVM string pool.
Being eligible for garbage collection and residing in the heap, a JVM
string pool seems to be a right place for all your strings, isn’t it?
In theory it is true – non-used strings will be garbage collected from
the pool, used strings will allow you to save memory in case then you
get an equal string from the input. Seems to be a perfect memory
saving strategy? Nearly so. You must know how the string pool is
implemented before making any decisions.
source.
As other answers explain Memory in Java is divided into two portions
1. Stack: One stack is created per thread and it stores stack frames which again stores local variables and if a variable is a reference type then that variable refers to a memory location in heap for the actual object.
2. Heap: All kinds of objects will be created in heap only.
Heap memory is again divided into 3 portions
1. Young Generation: Stores objects which have a short life, Young Generation itself can be divided into two categories Eden Space and Survivor Space.
2. Old Generation: Store objects which have survived many garbage collection cycles and still being referenced.
3. Permanent Generation: Stores metadata about the program e.g. runtime constant pool.
String constant pool belongs to the permanent generation area of Heap memory.
We can see the runtime constant pool for our code in the bytecode by using javap -verbose class_name which will show us method references (#Methodref), Class objects ( #Class ), string literals ( #String )
You can read more about it on my article How Does JVM Handle Method Overloading and Overriding Internally.
To the great answers that already included here I want to add something that missing in my perspective - an illustration.
As you already JVM divides the allocated memory to a Java program into two parts. one is stack and another one is heap. Stack is used for execution purpose and heap is used for storage purpose. In that heap memory, JVM allocates some memory specially meant for string literals. This part of the heap memory is called string constants pool.
So for example, if you init the following objects:
String s1 = "abc";
String s2 = "123";
String obj1 = new String("abc");
String obj2 = new String("def");
String obj3 = new String("456);
String literals s1 and s2 will go to string constant pool, objects obj1, obj2, obj3 to the heap. All of them, will be referenced from the Stack.
Also, please note that "abc" will appear in heap and in string constant pool. Why is String s1 = "abc" and String obj1 = new String("abc") will be created this way? It's because String obj1 = new String("abc") explicitly creates a new and referentially distinct instance of a String object and String s1 = "abc" may reuse an instance from the string constant pool if one is available. For a more elaborate explanation: https://stackoverflow.com/a/3298542/2811258

Categories