I have the following code:
#RequestMapping(value="/mobile/device", method = RequestMethod.PUT)
public ResponseEntity<Void> flagDevice (#RequestBody List<MobileDeviceData> devicedataList, #RequestHeader(value="special_code") String specialCode) {
// Implementation details
}
Each instance of MobileDeviceData that gets created needs to have a param field filled in with the RequestHeader special_code.
How would I go about doing this so that it is fully populated by the time the flagDevice method body gets called?
Thanks in advance.
This is non trivial.
An HttpMessageConverter is already provided that deserializes the JSON, that's the MappingJackson2HttpMessageConverter. It has access to request headers. You could extend that class to also use the headers for deserialization (this is extremely difficult to do generically, as opposed to only for MobileDeviceData).
You could use Spring AOP, intercept the method, retrieve the arguments, cast to the appropriate types, and assign the value yourself.
The solution I would go for is the simplest: do it yourself in the handler method. Loop the the List and use a corresponding setter to set the specialCode for each MobileDeviceData.
Another option is to define your own HandlerMethodArgumentResolver specifically for List<MobileDeviceData> parameters that need to be constructed from header vales.
Related
I am trying to intercept the object that is being returned in my controller so that I can create a flat JSON structure of the response, before Spring invokes Jackson's serialization process.
I am going to support a query parameter that allows the client to flatten the response body. Something like:
/v1/rest/employees/{employeId}/id?flat=true
The controller method looks something like:
public Employee getEmployee(...) {}
I would like to avoid implementing this flattening logic in every one of my service calls and continue to return the Employee object.
Is there some kind of facility in Spring that would allow me to A) read the query string and B) intercept the object that is being returned as the response body?
Here's one idea. There may be a better way, but this will work:
Define an extra request mapping to do the flat mapping:
#RequestMapping(path = "/endpoint", params = {"flat"})
public String getFlatThing() {
return flatMapper.writeValueAsString(getThing());
}
// The Jackson converter will do its ordinary serialization here.
#RequestMapping(path = "/endpoint")
public Thing getFlatThing() {
return new Thing();
}
the "flatMapper" implementation can be whatever you like so long as it works.
One option is to use Jackson's ObjectMapper to write the value as json first and then use https://github.com/wnameless/json-flattener to flatten that to your desired output. There may also be a way to define a custom ObjectMapper that does flat mapping, though that would take some more work on your part.
In my Spring web application, I have an API that accepts requests with application/x-www-form-urlencoded content type.
#RequestMapping(value = "/do-it", method = {RequestMethod.POST})
public String test(#ModelAttribute("request")RequestDTO request,HttpServletRequest
httpServletRequest, Map<String, Object> model, RedirectAttributes redirectAttributes){
.....
}
My RequestDTO has following fields in it.
public class RequestDTO {
private String paramOne;
private String paramTwo;
// standard getters and setters
}
This implementation works fine, all the request params get mapped to the request dto as expected. However, now I have this requirement to accept the requests with the fields in following pattern.
param_one, param_two
I understand that, using #JsonProperty annotation on the fields in my request dto is not gonna work in my case since the request is not in the type of application/json.
The only way I have found to solve the issue is creating new setters like following (which looks ugly in my opinion when it comes to naming convention).
public void setParam_one(String param_one) {
this.paramOne = param_one;
}
Can some one help me to find a better way to get this done? I cannot change the param names in original request dto.
Thank you..!
I was able to get this done. Thanks to #neetash for guiding me.
Everything I needed to have was a Custom HandlerMethodArgumentResolver to map the post request body data to the object that I wanted to get.
I followed following linked tutorial to implement it. It contains every single thing someone needs to know to create a HandlerMethodArgumentResolver.
https://www.petrikainulainen.net/programming/spring-framework/spring-from-the-trenches-creating-a-custom-handlermethodargumentresolver/
My major intention is to do validation for an object in Spring Controller itself.
My code structure looks like
public #ResponseBody
String functionName(#RequestBody Employee employee){}
The idea is to validate the DTO the moment an http post request is hit
For same,I wrote an exception method to be called in constructor which adds the object to an error queue in case of error.
However the problem is, the values are set in spring by setter and not by constructor.
Is there any way/setting to change it so that values are set by constructor.
EDIT
The intention is to validate object employee the moment request is received without writing another method to validate.
My idea was to do validation in constructor of Employee and in case of failure, Pass the data to a error handler and stop object formation itself.
But it seems, In spring constructor is not used to set data, instead setter's are used.
So question is if constructor can be used.
Using the Retrofit REST Client library from Square, is there anyway of providing default/constant values for POST/PUT fields in a call.
I know about including constant query parameters by simply including them in the path, but this work for Body parameters.
I have an API that looks similar to:
POST /api/create
type=constanta&value={value}
POST /api/create
type=constantb&value={value}&otherValue={otherValue}
where the second variant requires an additional argument to be supplied. Rather than having a single java method that took all three arguments, I was hoping to be able to elide the constants from the method call, something like:
create(String value);
create(String value, String otherValue);
and have retrofit inject the type argument constant.
Given that adding #FormUrlEncoded can be added to modify how the body is encoded, if it's not natively supported by Retrofit, is there anyway of adding my own annotation and injecting such default values? ( It doesn't appear that RequestInterceptor allows one to modify the body.. ).
Maybe one option would be to send an object, which encapsulates all your values, instead of all string values separately? The object would implement your default values.
For example, you could create a class:
public class CreateObject {
private String type = "constant";
private String value;
private String otherValue;
public CreateObject(String value, String otherValue) {
this.value = value;
this.otherValue = otherValue;
}
}
Your class handles your constant. You could just set it to a default value "constant", like I did above, or set it on the fly in the constructor.
Now all you've to do is to create the object with the values and make the request with Retrofit. Instead of using the string values directly, just pass the object. Your interface could look like this:
public interface CreateService {
#POST("/api/create")
void create(#Body CreateObject create, Callback<CreateObject> cb);
}
The request implementation like this:
CreateObject create = new CreateObject("value", "otherValue");
createService.create(create, new Callback<CreateObject)() {…});
This should include all three of your values in the request body, if they are set. If a value is null, it won't be included in the request body. Based on your two examples above, you would now only need one interface method. Which values are sent is based on the createObject you pass on. For example, if you set otherValue as null, it won't be part of the request body.
My examples were modified from: https://futurestud.io/blog/retrofit-send-objects-in-request-body/
Is it possible for you to use Guava or Java 8 Optional as second argument in method? Then if that argument will be absent you can just ignore it
I'm going to implement a RESTful webservice using Spring.
Let it be an ordinary PUT method, something like this:
#RequestMapping(method=RequestMethod.PUT, value="/foo")
public #ResponseBody void updateFoo(#RequestBody Foo foo) {
fooService.update(foo);
}
In such a case input JSON format (if it corresponds to Foo class) will be successfully converted to Foo instance with no extra efforts, or error will be issued in case of wrong format.
But I'd like to make the service able to consume two different types of formats using same method (e.g. PUT) and same URL (e.g. /foo).
So that it possibly looked like:
//PUT method #1
#RequestMapping(method=RequestMethod.PUT, value="/foo")
public #ResponseBody void updateFoo(#RequestBody Foo foo) {
fooService.update(foo);
}
//PUT method #2
#RequestMapping(method=RequestMethod.PUT, value="/foo")
public #ResponseBody void updateFoo(#RequestBody FooExtra fooExtra) {
fooService.update(fooExtra);
}
and Spring converter tried to convert input JSON not only in Foo but in FooExtra as well and invoked corresponding PUT method depending on input format.
In fact, I tried to implement it exactly as it described above but without success. Is it even possible? Maybe, I need some kind of "trick"?
What is the best (and the most proper) way to achieve such behavior? Of course, I could always make two different URLs but I'd like to know whether it is possible with the same one.
Your attempt didn't work simply because Spring tried to match your methods against the request, by looking at url and method type, which are in both cases the same. It does not work like overloading in Java; argument types do not differentiate your methods.
But there are good news. SpringMVC can also examine request headers and request parameters when trying to match your handler methods. Since what you want to pass is actually pure metadata -an alternative format type of the same information- it makes perfect sense to use a custom request header. It's very easy to add custom headers when using a rest api. See the following link for JAX-RS: Adding a custom header.
Now in your server side you should configure the handler methods as:
//PUT method #1
#RequestMapping(method=RequestMethod.PUT, value="/foo", headers="returnType=Foo")
public #ResponseBody Foo updateFoo(#RequestBody Foo foo) {
fooService.update(foo);
}
//PUT method #2
#RequestMapping(method=RequestMethod.PUT, value="/foo", headers="returnType=FooExtra")
public #ResponseBody FooExtra updateFoo(#RequestBody FooExtra fooExtra) {
fooService.update(fooExtra);
}
Note also that if you want to access a return value with #ResponseBody you have to return your object, otherwise make the methods void
For understanding it we should think how Spring works, it uses Dispatcher Servlet. I don't think that spring does "combine" work for different types of input.
So my answer will be: "trick" with two different urls ;)