Let's say i have many toggle buttons and i would like to change their state based on a condition, like this: if(something){buttonone.setSelected(true);}
The problem is, i have more than a 100 buttons and it would be a lot of time to write the conditions one by one.
Is it possible to get the buttons from a string and toggle the desired ones?
String buttontext="buttonone, buttontwo, buttonthree";
(button from the string).setSelected(true);
I'm new to Java, and i can't find an aswer to this.
Thanks!
Place the buttons into an ArrayList or other collection and use a for loop through them, setting them selected if they match criteria. Also as noted in comments, if you use a HashMap<String, JToggleButton>, you can easily obtain a reference to the button of interest by its String "key", and then do what you wish with it.
Related
I want to create a list in java, to show a various number of panels, which include a checkbox, a textfield and a button. Then I want to check if for example checkbox_1 is checked. If so, then call the number from textfield_1. I don't know how i can check explicit the textfield_1 or checkbox_1. With a for-loop i make every checkbox with same variable name. Sure you have a solution for me :)
I hope my drawing helps you to understand my question.
thanks :)
When dealing with a ListView, for example, there is a way to define its selection mode, just like this:
ListView lstV = new ListView();
lstV.setItems(FXCollections.observableArrayList(a));
lstV.getSelectionModel().setSelectionMode(SelectionMode.MULTIPLE);
I've noticed that there is one more SelectionMode - Single - yet I tried them both and didn't notice any difference. Can anyone explain it to me?
SelectionMode.MULTIPLE "Allows for one or more contiguous range of indices to be selected at a time." Try shift, alt or ⌘ clicking multiple items to see the effect. In contrast, SelectionMode.SINGLE, precludes multiple selection.
I have a large set of data from which the user has to select one. I'm thinking of a way to implement it (of course, in a GUI). I have a few ideas. But just thought of posting here as there may be better alternatives..
Say, user has to select a name from a large set of user base. If I simply put a text field for user to enter the name, then there can be issues like entering same name in different formats, misspelling etc...
I see two options here
Using a combo box
Using a list (Actually i'm thinking of something like a tool tip. As I cant show the whole list always due to space issues)
But combo box won't be much user friendly i guess. As the user will have to scroll around the whole list to select an entry. If the number of entries are too large, this will be
Which means, now I'm left only one option. A popping up list, which will change the content according the text user is entering in the text field. So he can type first few letters and the list will show all the entries starting from the entered text. Got my point, right?
Are there any other better to achieve this kind of need?
If I'm going to implement above, what will be the best way to follow. I'm thinking of extending the JTextField to add required functionality. Well, I'll put some method to set the popup list entries. And I'll add some actionListner to watch the text field, and control the popup list accordingly...
Autocomplete is what you are probably looking for. Google for "java swing jcombobox autocomplete" and limit results for the last couple of years to get relevant results. There will be a lot of examples and ideas on how to implement this with custom code.
I believe there is also some custom libraries like "swingx" that provide at least partial or full implementations to save time.
http://swingx.java.net/
They have released code as recently as the beginning of this years so it appears active and might have what you need.
You could take a look at SwingLab's autocomplete feature, it allows you to attach it to a JCombBox, JList or JTextComponent
use AutoComplete JComboBox/JTextField
based on Standard Java Classes
no issue with larger sets of data
no issue with Focus, BackSpace Key, Caret
for better performance to required sort the array before use
simple workaround for setStrict(true/false), restrict input to array
I'm new to GWT. I have a simple SuggestBox which is populated using a MultiWordSuggestOracle. Users input their data to this SuggestBox, and if they find any match with the existing Suggestions its well and good. I'm able to retrieve this value in the SelectionHandler code as below.
display.getSuggestBox().addSelectionHandler(new SelectionHandler<Suggestion>() {
public void onSelection(SelectionEvent<Suggestion> event) {
String selectedProperty = ((SuggestBox)event.getSource()).getValue();
// do something with the property value
}
});
But users are allowed to enter values which are not already in the Suggestion oracle, in which case I should read this value and do something with this,may be saving to db as a new data.(The thing which I'm looking for is something like a browsers navigation widget where we show suggestions, users can pick up any suggestion or he can type in his new entry and carry on.) What I needed is a way to retrieve this new text user has entered? Data will be read on a button click. What I tried out is this.
display.getSaveBtn().addClickHandler(new ClickHandler() {
public void onClick(ClickEvent event) {
String selectedProperty = display.getSuggestBox().getValue();
//String selectedProperty2 = display.getSuggestBox().getText();
// Blank in both cases :(
// tried display.getSuggestBox().getTextBox().getValue(),but blank again
}
});
I tried to employ onChange() event handlers (as shown below)
display.getSuggestBox().addValueChangeHandler(new ValueChangeHandler<String>() {
public void onValueChange(ValueChangeEvent<String> event) {
String selectedProperty = ((SuggestBox)event.getSource()).getValue();
Window.alert("on change -- "+selectedProperty);
}
});
This is working fine except one scenario. Suppose there are two suggestions in the oracle,say 'createTicketWsdl' and 'createTicketTimeout'. When the user types in 'cr', he is opted with these two options, and if he selects 'createTicketWsdl' by pressing keyboard ENTER, then my alert is printing 'createTicketWsdl' which is correct. But if he selects 'createTicketWsdl' using mouse, then my alert is printing 'cr' (I tried to post the screenshot to give a better understanding, but being a new user I'm not allowed).(which I wanted to get as 'createTicketWsdl'since thats what he has selected). Soon after printing my alert, the value in the SuggestBox changes to 'createTicketWsdl'.
Is there a way to retrieve the value of the suggest box? I saw a similiar thread GWT SuggestBox + ListBox Widget, where some source code for a custom widget is available. But I didn't take the pain of trying out that, since what I want is simply get the current value from the SuggestBox and I hope there should be some easy way.
Thanks for all your help!
Your question is not very clear. You need to clarify your language a lil' bit. For example - is the following a question or an assertion? I mean, it sounds like an assertion but it has a question mark.
What I needed is a way to retrieve this new text user has entered?
Also, I do not understand what you mean by "he is opted by". Did you mean to say, "he is presented with the options ..." ?
Therefore, I am guessing your situation.
You have a listbox of existing items.
You have a textbox which allows freeform text entry
Any items whose prefix values matches the current textbox entry, the listbox items would be filtered to be limited to the matching items.
Even if the current textbox entry presents matching prefixes to filtering the listbox, the user can still perform freeform text entry. So, there are two possible cases here
4.1 the user clicks on the list box to select one of the filtered items
4.2 the user press enter key, which triggers selection of the current value of the textbox.
However, you find your widget participating in a race condition, so that when you click on the widget, the ValueChangeHandler gets triggered rather than the SelectionHandler. I do not know the structure of your widget so that is my best guess.
The problem is that you are allowing two separate modes of obtaining an outcome and you probably did not have well-defined state machine to handle choosing the appropriate mode. One mode is by the textbox and the other is by selection on the listbox - and you do not have a well-defined way of which would mode would be effective at any moment.
If my guess is accurate, this is what you need to do:
You must restrict your outcome to coming from only the textbox.
Your listbox selection must not trigger any outcome. Any change in listbox selection must propagate back to the textbox - to allow the user the chance of making further freeform entry based on that value.
only the keyboard enter on the textbox will trigger the final outcome.
In my application, I have URN-identified data coming in from the server. I'm in the process of abstracting as far as possible so there is very little to no logical code in my views, and I'm using a generic presenter that wraps those views. All widgets have URNs, making it super easy to map incoming data to a specific widget (until now, a 1 to 1 relationship). This has worked well for pretty much every widget, and now I've reached a point where I'm tripped up.
Assume I have (just for simplicity's sake) two RadioButton elements on a view. These buttons belong to a "group" (just by setting their name values to the same thing), but obviously they're 2 distinct elements. I can't map my URN-identified data to a single widget as in every other case because, in this case, it is two widgets.
Here's an example of what I mean:
Utility Company is a ListBox, so just one widget there. I map each item in the list to a specific Enum value.
Utility Rate is a TextBox, so again just one widget to map.
For Energy Usage, they can select to use either an average for the year or input 12 monthly values. I'm stuck here. I can't map to just one of the RadioButton elements, because then I'd need some extra logic in the view to handle the behavior appropriately.
Am I stuck mapping to just one widget and sticking (unwanted) logic in my view to determine what the state of all of the elements should be based on the value that came in for the one widget that is mapped?
How should I handle this case?
Edit (Solution):
Following the concepts of jusio's answer, I came up with a workable solution. Because I didn't want to go sticking special case handling through my logic to take care of a non-widget, I created a RadioButtonSet faux widget (public class RadioButtonSet <T extends Enum<?> & HasDisplayText> extends Widget implements HasValueChangeHandlers<T>, HasValue<T>), into which I manually pass the radios I intend to group. Having done that, I can get or set its value and have it fire appropriate events when the user changes the selection. Then mapping the collection of radios is no different than doing so for a listbox. Thanks jusio.
I believe in your case you shouldn't treat radio buttons as two separate widgets, basically in your case you can treat the radio button group as combo box, because behavior is almost the same (the only problem is that you have additional master detail). So basically what you will have to do is to wrap real BO objects into some kind of RadioButtonGroupModel, and give it to view, view can take this model and generate radio buttons (with some editors or whatever else). I remember running into this problem when i was extending databinding FW for JFace, and this was the best way I could find to solve this problem.
If I understood correctly the problem, there are 2 possible solutions:
Give each RadioButton a unique URN (ex: oldURN_1 , oldURN_2)
When you send data for a URN, disable the other one
Keep the same Name for each RadioButton but add a number variable in the data the server sends indicating which radioButton it is supposed to use (ex: 0 for Average and 1 for Monthly)