I am trying to execute a series of jobs where one job execute other two, and one of the two execute another.
Job 1 --> Job 3
--> Job 2 -->Job 4
The jobs are for sending data from db.
This is what i have done
#PersistJobDataAfterExecution
#DisallowConcurrentExecution
public class MembersJob implements Job{
List<Member>unsentMem=new ArrayList<Member>();
JSONArray customerJson = new JSONArray();
Depot depot;
public MembersJob(){
depot = new UserHandler().getDepot();
}
public void execute(JobExecutionContext jec) throws JobExecutionException {
if ( Util.getStatus() ){
runSucceedingJobs(jec);
} else {
System.out.println("No internet connection");
}
}
public void runSucceedingJobs(JobExecutionContext context){
JobDataMap jobDataMap = context.getJobDetail().getJobDataMap();
Object milkCollectionJobObj = jobDataMap.get("milkCollectionJob");
MilkCollectionsJob milkCollectionsJob = (MilkCollectionsJob)milkCollectionJobObj;
Object productsJobObj = jobDataMap.get("milkCollectionJob");
ProductsJob productsJob = (ProductsJob)productsJobObj;
try {
milkCollectionsJob.execute(context);
productsJob.execute(context);
} catch (JobExecutionException ex) {
System.out.println("Error...");
Logger.getLogger(MembersJob.class.getName()).log(Level.SEVERE, null, ex);
}
}
}
Call jobs in series
//Members Job
JobKey membersJobKey = new JobKey("salesJob", "group1");
JobDetail membersJob = JobBuilder.newJob(MembersJob.class)
.withIdentity(membersJobKey).build();
membersJob.getJobDataMap().put("milkCollectionJob", new MilkCollectionsJob());
membersJob.getJobDataMap().put("productsJob", new ProductsJob());
//
CronTrigger membersTrigger = newTrigger()
.withIdentity("salesTrigger", "group1")
.withSchedule(
cronSchedule("0/10 * * * * ?"))
.forJob(membersJobKey)
.build();
Scheduler scheduler = new StdSchedulerFactory().getScheduler();
scheduler.scheduleJob(membersJob, membersTrigger);
scheduler.start();
The problem is members job starts but does not start other jobs when it is done. What is the easiest and fastest way to achieve this?
Related
I want to delete a job for which I need job key. I only know the job class name. Please suggest how to get the same using job class name.
You can find this information if you iterate over all jobgroups of your scheduler instances. From there you get the jobKey. With the jobKey you can ask for the jobDetail, which holds the class information. If it matches just return the key.
public JobKey getJobKeyByJobClass (Scheduler scheduler, String className){
for (final String group : scheduler.getJobGroupNames()) {
for (final JobKey jobKey : scheduler.getJobKeys(org.quartz.impl.matchers.GroupMatcher.groupEquals(group))) {
if(className.equals(scheduler.getJobDetail(jobKey).getJobClass().getName())){
return jobKey;
}
}
}
return null;
}
You can obtain JobKey by several ways. Let's imagine that your Job implemenation is MyJob class.
From JobExecutionContext. If your job is executing you can
Scheduler scheduler = schedulerFactory.getScheduler();
JobKey jobKey = null;
for (JobExecutionContext jobCtx : scheduler.getCurrentlyExecutingJobs()) {
JobDetail jobDetail = jobCtx.getJobDetail();
if (MyJob.class.equals(jobDetail.getJobClass())) {
jobKey = jobDetail.getKey();
break;
}
}
same with streams
Scheduler scheduler = schedulerFactory.getScheduler();
Optional<JobDetail> job = scheduler.getCurrentlyExecutingJobs()
.stream()
.map(JobExecutionContext::getJobDetail)
.filter(jobDetail -> MyJob.class.equals(jobDetail.getJobClass()))
.findFirst();
JobKey jobKey = job.isPresent() ? job.get().getKey() : null;
By group name. Ususally, when you're submitting new job for execution you're providing group and job names. If you're not doing so, start, it will make the things easier:)
Scheduler scheduler = schedulerFactory.getScheduler();
JobKey jobKey = null;
for (JobKey jk : scheduler.getJobKeys(GroupMatcher.jobGroupEquals("myGroup"))) {
if (MyJob.class.equals(scheduler.getJobDetail(jk).getJobClass())) {
jobKey = jk;
break;
}
}
same with streams
Scheduler scheduler = schedulerFactory.getScheduler();
Optional<JobDetail> job = scheduler.getJobKeys(GroupMatcher.jobGroupEquals("myGroup"))
.stream()
.map(jk -> scheduler.getJobDetail(jk))
.filter(jobDetail -> MyJob.class.equals(jobDetail.getJobClass()))
.findFirst();
JobKey jobKey = job.isPresent() ? job.get().getKey() : null;
Hope it helps!
My Spring-Batch job is set like that:
#Bean
Job myJob(JobBuilderFactory jobBuilderFactory,
#Qualifier("stepA") Step stepA,
#Qualifier("s"tepB) Step stepB) {
return jobBuilderFactory.get("myJob")
.incrementer(new RunIdIncrementer())
.start(stepA)
.next(stepB)
.build();
}
And here is my launcher:
#Autowired
JobLauncher(#Qualifier("myJob") Job job, JobLauncher jobLauncher) {
this.job = job;
this.jobLauncher = jobLauncher;
}
#Scheduled(fixedDelay=5000)
void launcher() throws JobParametersInvalidException, JobExecutionAlreadyRunningException, JobRestartException, JobInstanceAlreadyCompleteException {
jobLauncher.run(job, newExecution());
}
private JobParameters newExecution() {
Map<String, JobParameter> parameters = new HashMap<>();
this.dateTime = new DateTime(DateTimeZone.UTC);
this.dateTimeString = this.dateTime.toString(ISODateTimeFormat.dateTime());
JobParameter parameter = new JobParameter(this.dateTimeString);
parameters.put("currentTime", parameter);
return new JobParameters(parameters);
}
As you can see, my job is scheduled to launch every 5 seconds.
But, after first launch, it does not end; it goes on the next execution.
The job is like in a loop. I would like it to stop and restart after 5 seconds.
I missed that readers need to return null when they finish. Problem solved.
You can also use System.exit(0); at the end of main class which will terminate JVM resulting in terminatation of batch.
Hi i have two jobs instances in quartz that i want to not run in parallel, i simplified the code in the example below to show what is not in line with my expectations.
public class QuartzTest {
public static void main( String[] args ) throws SchedulerException {
SchedulerFactory schedulerFactory = new StdSchedulerFactory();
Scheduler scheduler = schedulerFactory.getScheduler();
scheduler.start();
JobDetail job1 = newJob( TestJob.class ).withIdentity( "job1", "group1" ).build();
CronTrigger trigger1 = newTrigger().withIdentity( "trigger1", "group1" ).startAt( new Date() ).withSchedule( cronSchedule( getCronExpression( 1 ) ) ).build();
scheduler.scheduleJob( job1, trigger1 );
JobDetail job2 = newJob( TestJob.class ).withIdentity( "job2", "group1" ).build();
CronTrigger trigger2 = newTrigger().withIdentity( "trigger2", "group1" ).startAt( new Date() ).withSchedule( cronSchedule( getCronExpression( 1 ) ) ).build();
scheduler.scheduleJob( job2, trigger2 );
for ( int i = 0; i < 5; i++ ) {
System.out.println( trigger1.getNextFireTime() );
System.out.println( trigger2.getNextFireTime() );
try {
Thread.sleep( 1 * 60 * 1000 );
} catch ( InterruptedException e ) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
private static String getCronExpression( int interval ) {
return "0 */" + interval + " * * * ?";
}
}
This is the job class
#DisallowConcurrentExecution
public class TestJob implements Job {
#Override
public void execute( JobExecutionContext context ) throws JobExecutionException {
System.out.println( "Job started" );
System.out.println( "Job sleeping 30s..." );
try {
Thread.sleep( 30 * 1000 );
} catch ( InterruptedException e ) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
System.out.println( "Job finished." );
}
}
So here i am scheduling two jobs to run each minute (in the real case one is running every minute the other every 5) and this is the output i am getting:
Job started
Job sleeping 30s...
Job started
Job sleeping 30s...
Job finished.
Job finished.
So both job are running in parallel, because a sequential sequence where job1 waits for job2 to complete before running would give me this sequence
Job started
Job sleeping 30s...
Job finished.
Job started
Job sleeping 30s...
Job finished.
So why is this not happening ?
From docs:
#DisallowConcurrentExecution:
An annotation that marks a Job class as one that must not have multiple instances executed concurrently (where instance is based-upon a JobDetail definition - or in other words based upon a JobKey).
JobKey is composed of both a name and group
In your example the name is not the same, so this is two different jobs.
DisallowConcurrentExecution is ensuring that job1#thread1 is completed before you trigger another job1#thread2.
I want to catch a hibernate database exception in my quartz job class, please find my quartz listener and quart job class, I'm trying to test my quartz scheduler with database failure scenario, while executing my quartz job I'm stopping mysql db to verify my quartz job class catching hibernate exception or not.
But the code below does not catch if any db exception occurs.
Can someone help what I'm doing wrong here:
MyListener.java
#WebListener
public class MyListener extends QuartzInitializerListener {
private final Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(MyListener.class);
private Scheduler scheduler;
#Override
public void contextInitialized(ServletContextEvent sce) {
super.contextInitialized(sce);
ServletContext ctx = sce.getServletContext();
StdSchedulerFactory factory = (StdSchedulerFactory) ctx.getAttribute(QUARTZ_FACTORY_KEY);
try {
scheduler = factory.getScheduler();
JobDetail job = newJob(TestQuartzJob.class)
.withIdentity("job1", "group1")
.build();
CronTrigger trigger = newTrigger()
.withIdentity("trigger1", "group1")
.withSchedule(cronSchedule("0/20 * * * * ?"))
.build();
scheduler.scheduleJob(job, trigger);
scheduler.start();
} catch (Exception e) {
ctx.log("There was an error scheduling the job.", e);
}
}
TestQuartzJob.java
public class TestQuartzJob implements Job throws JobExecutionException{
Logger logger = Logger.getLogger(TestQuartzJob.class);
Session mysession = HibernateUtilities.getJobsSessionFactory().openSession();
Transaction transaction = mysession.beginTransaction();
#Override
public void execute(JobExecutionContext jec) {
try {
Student getstudName = (Student) mysession.
createCriteria(Student).add(eq(“student_id", “stud1234")).uniqueResult();
String name = getstudName.getName();
} catch (Exception e) {
logger.info("--- Error in job!");
JobExecutionException e2 = new JobExecutionException(e);
// this job will refire immediately
e2.refireImmediately();
throw e2;
}
}
}
I have a controller with WebAsyncTask. Further on I'm using a timeout callback.
As writen here I shall have an option to notifies the Callable to cancel processing. However I don't see any option to do so.
#Controller
public class UserDataProviderController {
private static final Logger log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(UserDataProviderController.class.getName());
#Autowired
private Collection<UserDataService> dataServices;
#RequestMapping(value = "/client/{socialSecurityNumber}", method = RequestMethod.GET)
public #ResponseBody
WebAsyncTask<ResponseEntity<CustomDataResponse>> process(#PathVariable final String socialSecurityNumber) {
final Callable<ResponseEntity<CustomDataResponse>> callable = new Callable<ResponseEntity<CustomDataResponse>>() {
#Override
public ResponseEntity<CustomDataResponse> call() throws Exception {
CustomDataResponse CustomDataResponse = CustomDataResponse.newInstance();
// Find user data
for(UserDataService dataService:dataServices)
{
List<? extends DataClient> clients = dataService.findBySsn(socialSecurityNumber);
CustomDataResponse.put(dataService.getDataSource(), UserDataConverter.convert(clients));
}
// test long execution
Thread.sleep(4000);
log.info("Execution thread continued and shall be terminated:"+Thread.currentThread().getName());
HttpHeaders responseHeaders = new HttpHeaders();
responseHeaders.setContentType(new MediaType("application", "json", Charset.forName("UTF-8")));
return new ResponseEntity(CustomDataResponse,responseHeaders,HttpStatus.OK);
}
};
final Callable<ResponseEntity<CustomDataResponse>> callableTimeout = new Callable<ResponseEntity<CustomDataResponse>>() {
#Override
public ResponseEntity<CustomDataResponse> call() throws Exception {
// Error response
HttpHeaders responseHeaders = new HttpHeaders();
responseHeaders.setContentType(new MediaType("application", "json", Charset.forName("UTF-8")));
return new ResponseEntity("Request has timed out!",responseHeaders,HttpStatus.INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR);
}
};
WebAsyncTask<ResponseEntity<CustomDataResponse>> task = new WebAsyncTask<>(3000,callable);
task.onTimeout(callableTimeout);
return task;
}
}
My #WebConfig
#Configuration
#EnableWebMvc
class WebAppConfig extends WebMvcConfigurerAdapter {
#Override
public void configureAsyncSupport(AsyncSupportConfigurer configurer) {
ThreadPoolTaskExecutor executor = new ThreadPoolTaskExecutor();
executor.setCorePoolSize(5);
executor.setMaxPoolSize(10);
executor.setKeepAliveSeconds(60 * 60);
executor.afterPropertiesSet();
configurer.registerCallableInterceptors(new TimeoutCallableProcessingInterceptor());
configurer.setTaskExecutor(executor);
}
}
And quite standard Interceptor:
public class TimeoutCallableProcessingInterceptor extends CallableProcessingInterceptorAdapter {
#Override
public <T> Object handleTimeout(NativeWebRequest request, Callable<T> task) {
throw new IllegalStateException("[" + task.getClass().getName() + "] timed out");
}
}
Everything work as it should, but Callable from controller always completes, which is obvious, but how to stop processing there ?
You can use WebAsyncTask to implement the timeout control and Thread management to stop the new async thread gracefully.
Implement a Callable to run the process
In this method (that runs in a diferent thread) store the current Thread in a Controller's local variable
Implement another Callable to handle timeout event
In this method retrieve the previously stored Thread and interrupt it calling the interrupt() method.
Also throw a TimeoutException to stop the controller process
In the running process, check if the thread interrupted with Thread.currentThread().isInterrupted(), if so, then rollback the transaction throwing an Exception.
Controller:
public WebAsyncTask<ResponseEntity<BookingFileDTO>> confirm(#RequestBody final BookingConfirmationRQDTO bookingConfirmationRQDTO)
throws AppException,
ProductException,
ConfirmationException,
BeanValidationException {
final Long startTimestamp = System.currentTimeMillis();
// The compiler obligates to define the local variable shared with the callable as final array
final Thread[] asyncTaskThread = new Thread[1];
/**
* Asynchronous execution of the service's task
* Implemented without ThreadPool, we're using Tomcat's ThreadPool
* To implement an specific ThreadPool take a look at http://docs.spring.io/spring/docs/current/spring-framework-reference/htmlsingle/#mvc-ann-async-configuration-spring-mvc
*/
Callable<ResponseEntity<BookingFileDTO>> callableTask = () -> {
//Stores the thread of the newly started asynchronous task
asyncTaskThread[0] = Thread.currentThread();
log.debug("Running saveBookingFile task at `{}`thread", asyncTaskThread[0].getName());
BookingFileDTO bookingFileDTO = bookingFileService.saveBookingFile(
bookingConfirmationRQDTO,
MDC.get(HttpHeader.XB3_TRACE_ID))
.getValue();
if (log.isDebugEnabled()) {
log.debug("The saveBookingFile task took {} ms",
System.currentTimeMillis() - startTimestamp);
}
return new ResponseEntity<>(bookingFileDTO, HttpStatus.OK);
};
/**
* This method is executed if a timeout occurs
*/
Callable<ResponseEntity<BookingFileDTO>> callableTimeout = () -> {
String msg = String.format("Timeout detected at %d ms during confirm operation",
System.currentTimeMillis() - startTimestamp);
log.error("Timeout detected at {} ms during confirm operation: informing BookingFileService.", msg);
// Informs the service that the time has ran out
asyncTaskThread[0].interrupt();
// Interrupts the controller call
throw new TimeoutException(msg);
};
WebAsyncTask<ResponseEntity<BookingFileDTO>> webAsyncTask = new WebAsyncTask<>(timeoutMillis, callableTask);
webAsyncTask.onTimeout(callableTimeout);
log.debug("Timeout set to {} ms", timeoutMillis);
return webAsyncTask;
}
Service implementation:
/**
* If the service has been informed that the time has ran out
* throws an AsyncRequestTimeoutException to roll-back transactions
*/
private void rollbackOnTimeout() throws TimeoutException {
if(Thread.currentThread().isInterrupted()) {
log.error(TIMEOUT_DETECTED_MSG);
throw new TimeoutException(TIMEOUT_DETECTED_MSG);
}
}
#Transactional(rollbackFor = TimeoutException.class, propagation = Propagation.REQUIRES_NEW)
DTOSimpleWrapper<BookingFileDTO> saveBookingFile(BookingConfirmationRQDTO bookingConfirmationRQDTO, String traceId) {
// Database operations
// ...
return retValue;
}