On a project I'm currently working on, we have the need for multiple profiles, i.e. "default" and "cloud".
both DefaultContext and CloudContext contains the same bean definitions
We are using PCF(Pivotal Cloud Foundry)
we have created an interface
public interface Config {
public DataSource getDataSource();
public SomeService getService();
}
Then implement each profile with this interface
#Primary
#Configuration
#Profile("default")
public class DevConfig implements Config
{
public DataSource getDataSource() {
// create and return production datasource
}
public SomeService getService() {
// Create and return production service
}
}
And then do the same for cloud.
#Configuratio
#Profile("cloud")
public class CloudConfig extends AbstractCloudConfig implements Config
{
public DataSource getDataSource() {
// create and return dummy datasource
}
public SomeService getService() {
// Create and return dummy service
}
}
And we are Autowiring in the service call, in processor file.
#Service("processor")
public class Processor {
#Autowired Config dsConfig;
public object get(int Number)
{
return dao.get(Number,dsConfig.getDataSource());
}
}
If we deploy in PCF, its working fine, as the profile is cloud. If we are running in local, it should get the default profile, but dsConfig is null.
Could you please help on this.
#Configuration classes aren't availalbe for autowiring.
As #spencergibb pointed out in the comment you need to tell the container to make this classes available for autowiring.
For that annotate them with #Component.
Something like this:
#Component
#Profile("default")
public class DevConfig implements Config
{
public DataSource getDataSource() {
// create and return production datasource
}
public SomeService getService() {
// Create and return production service
}
}
In case it still doesn't work, check the following two points:
Do you have the configs (DevConfig and Cloudconfig) in different packages so the ContextScan doesn't find it?
Are you running in another profile locally? (like Dev).
You can put this snipped to your code (its from JHipster) to log the active profiles.
#Autowired
private Environment env;
/**
* Initializes Application.
* <p/>
* Spring profiles can be configured with a program arguments --spring.profiles.active=your-active-profile
* <p/>
*/
#PostConstruct
public void initApplication() throws IOException {
if (env.getActiveProfiles().length == 0) {
log.warn("No Spring profile configured, running with default configuration");
}
else {
log.info("Running with Spring profile(s) : {}", Arrays.toString(env.getActiveProfiles()));
}
}
I'd rather autowire datasource and service classes instead of configuration class.
In this way you wouldn't need any instance of configuration and directly autowire whatever class you want.
So the classes will look like below.
Default Config:
#Primary
#Configuration
#Profile("default")
public class DevConfig implements Config
{
#Bean
public DataSource getDataSource() {
// create and return production datasource
}
#Bean
public SomeService getService() {
// Create and return production service
}
}
Cloud Config:
#Configuration
#Profile("cloud")
public class CloudConfig extends AbstractCloudConfig implements Config
{
#Bean
public DataSource getDataSource() {
// create and return dummy datasource
}
#Bean
public SomeService getService() {
// Create and return dummy service
}
}
Processor Class:
#Service("processor")
public class Processor {
#Autowired
private DataSource dataSource;
public object get(int Number)
{
return dao.get(Number,datasource);
}
}
Related
I'm writing application using spring mvc/boot, and I have two storage implementations: database storage and in memory storage. My global idea is choose in configuration file what storage application should use.
My idea is
put #Qualifier annotation on each storage implementation
create two configurations, like databaseStorageConfiguration and InMemoryStorageConfiguration
depends on profile, apply first or second configuration
The thing is I don't know how to bind implementation and configuration.
I tried something like this:
#Configuration
public class InMemoryStorageConfig {
#Autowired
#Qualifier("inMemoryStorage")
private Storage storage;
#Bean
public Storage getStorage() {
return storage;
}
}
But I get an error, that 3 beans were found: 2 beans with dfferent implementation and the 3rd one - in config
UPDATE 1
I've added #Profile("InMemory") to Configuration and activated that profile in properties. That gave no changes but looks more logical now
UPDATE 2
Full configuration:
#SpringBootApplication
#ImportResource("classpath:spring-config.xml")
public class Application {
public static void main(String... args) {
SpringApplication.run(Application.class, args);
}
}
#Service
public class WidgetService {
private WidgetCache widgetCache;
#Autowired
public WidgetService(WidgetCache widgetCache) {
this.widgetCache = widgetCache;
}
....
#Qualifier("databaseWidgetCache")
#Transactional
#Repository
public class DatabaseWidgetCache implements WidgetCache {
private WidgetRepository widgetRepository;
#Autowired
public DatabaseWidgetCache(WidgetRepository widgetRepository) {
this.widgetRepository = widgetRepository;
}
#Qualifier("inMemoryWidgetCache")
#Repository
public class InMemoryWidgetCache implements WidgetCache {
private WidgetLayersStorage widgetLayersStorage;
#Autowired
public InMemoryWidgetCache(WidgetLayersStorage widgetLayersStorage) {
this.widgetLayersStorage = widgetLayersStorage;
}
#Profile("InMemory")
#Configuration
public class InMemoryStorageConfig {
#Autowired
#Qualifier("inMemoryWidgetCache")
private WidgetCache widgetCache;
#Bean
public WidgetCache getWidgetCache() {
return widgetCache;
}
}
Stacktrace:
Parameter 0 of constructor in
com.widgets.service.widget.WidgetService required a single
bean, but 3 were found:
- inMemoryWidgetCache: defined in file [..../MemoryWidgetCache.class]
- databaseWidgetCache: defined in file [..../DatabaseWidgetCache.class]
- getWidgetCache: defined by method 'getWidgetCache' in class path resource
[......../InMemoryStorageConfig.class]
Action:
Consider marking one of the beans as #Primary, updating the consumer
to accept multiple beans, or using #Qualifier to identify the bean
that should be consumed
Your WidgetService should be changed to
#Service
public class WidgetService {
private WidgetCache widgetCache;
/** or
private List<WidgetCache> widgetCaches;
public WidgetService(List<WidgetCache> widgetCaches) {
this.widgetCaches = widgetCaches;
}
*/
public WidgetService(#Qualifier(<desired impl>) WidgetCache widgetCache) {
this.widgetCache = widgetCache;
}
}
and need to annotate your InMemoryWidgetCache and DatabaseWidgetCache with #Qualifier annotation. since you are using default convention.
and please remove
#Bean
public WidgetCache getWidgetCache() {
return widgetCache;
}
i don't see a real use there
In order to specify implementation in Configuration class, you don't need "Qualifier" annotation, and configuration should be changed to:
#Profile("inMemoryStorage")
#Import(InMemoryWidgetCache.class)
#Configuration
public class InMemoryStorageConfig {
}
thus, by activating profile, you choose the desire implementation
I am trying to do a similar thing with my application. I am using following versions of Spring boot and Cassandra:
spring-data-cassandra - 2.0.8.RELEASE
spring-boot-starter-parent - 2.0.4.RELEASE
I need to change some properties(mostly hostnames) of Cassandra on the fly and want it to make a new connection with the application. For config change we have internal Cloud Config Change Management and it runs fine on changes and listens to it.
This is my class :
#Configuration
#Order(Ordered.HIGHEST_PRECEDENCE)
#RefreshScope
#EnableCassandraRepositories(basePackages = {"com.*.*.*.dao.repo"})
public class AppConfig {
private static final Logger LOGGER = LoggerFactory.getLogger(AppConfig.class);
#Value("${application['cassandraPort']}")
private String cassandraPort;
#Value("${application['cassandraEndpoint']}")
private String cassandraEndpoint;
#Value("${application['keyspaceName']}")
private String keyspaceName;
#Value("${application['cassandraConsistency']}")
private String cassandraConsistency;
#Value("${application['cassandraUserName']}")
private String cassandraUserName;
#Autowired
private AppConfig appConfig;
public AppConfig() {
System.out.println("AppConfig Constructor");
}
public String getCassandraPort() {
return cassandraPort;
}
public void setCassandraPort(String cassandraPort) {
this.cassandraPort = cassandraPort;
}
public String getCassandraEndpoint() {
return cassandraEndpoint;
}
public void setCassandraEndpoint(String cassandraEndpoint) {
this.cassandraEndpoint = cassandraEndpoint;
}
public String getKeyspaceName() {
return keyspaceName;
}
public void setKeyspaceName(String keyspaceName) {
this.keyspaceName = keyspaceName;
}
public String getCassandraConsistency() {
return cassandraConsistency;
}
public void setCassandraConsistency(String cassandraConsistency) {
this.cassandraConsistency = cassandraConsistency;
}
public String getCassandraUserName() {
return cassandraUserName;
}
public void setCassandraUserName(String cassandraUserName) {
this.cassandraUserName = cassandraUserName;
}
#Bean
// #RefreshScope
public CassandraConverter converter() {
return new MappingCassandraConverter(this.mappingContext());
}
#Bean
// #RefreshScope
public CassandraMappingContext mappingContext() {
return new CassandraMappingContext();
}
#Bean
//#RefreshScope
public CassandraSessionFactoryBean session() {
CassandraSessionFactoryBean session = new CassandraSessionFactoryBean();
session.setCluster(this.cluster().getObject());
session.setKeyspaceName(appConfig.getKeyspaceName());
session.setConverter(this.converter());
session.setSchemaAction(SchemaAction.NONE);
return session;
}
#Bean
//#RefreshScope
public CassandraClusterFactoryBean cluster() {
CassandraClusterFactoryBean cluster = new CassandraClusterFactoryBean();
cluster.setContactPoints(appConfig.getCassandraEndpoint());
cluster.setPort(Integer.valueOf(appConfig.getCassandraPort()));
cluster.setUsername(appConfig.getCassandraUserName());
cluster.setPassword("password");
cluster.setQueryOptions(new QueryOptions().setConsistencyLevel(ConsistencyLevel.LOCAL_QUORUM));
return cluster;
}
}
However, when I try to use #RefreshScope with that Configuration class, the application fails to start. This is what it shows in console :
***************************
APPLICATION FAILED TO START
***************************
Description:
Parameter 2 of constructor in org.springframework.boot.autoconfigure.data.cassandra.CassandraDataAutoConfiguration required a bean of type 'com.datastax.driver.core.Cluster' that could not be found.
- Bean method 'cassandraCluster' not loaded because auto-configuration 'CassandraAutoConfiguration' was excluded
Action:
Consider revisiting the entries above or defining a bean of type 'com.datastax.driver.core.Cluster' in your configuration.
Is there some guidelines on using #RefreshScope with Cassandra Bean? If anyone has done that earlier can you share the same?
You're mixing a couple of things here.
The config carries properties and bean definitions.
#RefreshScope on AppConfig causes some interference with Spring Boot's auto-configuration and the declared beans aren't used (that's why you see Parameter 2 of constructor…).
To clean up, we will reuse what Spring Boot provides as much as possible, and only declare what's really needed.
Follow these steps to solve the issue (based on your code above):
Create a #ConfigurationProperties bean that encapsulates your properties, or better, reuse CassandraProperties.
Re-enable CassandraAutoConfiguration and remove your own MappingContext and CassandraConverter beans, keep only Cluster and Session bean definitions
Declare Cluster and Session beans as needed and make them use #RefreshScope. Your #Configuration class should look like:
Example Configuration:
#Configuration
public class MyConfig {
#Bean(destroyMethod = "close")
#RefreshScope
public Cluster cassandraCluster(CassandraProperties properties) {
Cluster.Builder builder = Cluster.builder().addContactPoints(properties.getContactPoints().toArray(new String[0]))
.withoutJMXReporting();
return builder.build();
}
#Bean(destroyMethod = "close")
#RefreshScope
public Session cassandraSession(CassandraProperties properties, Cluster cluster) {
return cluster.connect(properties.getKeyspaceName());
}
}
My project has a dependency on another one, and imports beans from it (using #ImportResource("foo.xml")).
foo.xml defines two datasources (datasource1 and datasource2), I would like to make datasource1 a primary (so all auto-configurations of Spring Boot will work).
Is it possible? I found out that there is a DefaultListableBeanFactory that has determinePrimaryCandidate method.
So the idea is to create my own ListableBeanFactory, that would extend the DefaultListableBeanFactory, but how to force Spring Boot to use my implementation?
Or maybe there is another, easier way to mark a given bean as primary (without changing the configuration where it is defined).
You can create a configuration in your project, which builds a new data source annotated as #Primary bean. This new data source will be the datasource1, which will be injected by spring to the new data source factory method. Here you have the working example.
The config:
#SpringBootApplication
public class BeanSpringExampleApplication
{
#Bean(name = "dataSource1")
public FakeDataSource dataSource1()
{
return new FakeDataSource("dataSource1");
}
#Bean(name = "dataSource2")
public FakeDataSource dataSource2()
{
return new FakeDataSource("dataSource2");
}
#Bean
#Primary
public FakeDataSource primaryDataSource(
#Qualifier("dataSource1") FakeDataSource dataSource1)
{
return dataSource1;
}
}
Here you see three beans (using FakeDataSource class), which simulate your situation. The primaryDataSource bean factory method simply returns the dataSource1 (it's just a mere data source selector).
The FakeDataSource is just a placeholder, to make example runnable:
public class FakeDataSource
{
private final String fakeProperty;
public FakeDataSource(String id)
{
fakeProperty = id;
}
/**
* #return the fakeProperty
*/
public String getFakeProperty()
{
return fakeProperty;
}
}
Finally, a test which proves everything is working:
#RunWith(SpringRunner.class)
#SpringBootTest
public class BeanSpringExampleApplicationTests
{
#Autowired
private FakeDataSource fakeDataSource;
#Test
public void should_AutowirePrimaryDataSource() throws Exception
{
assertEquals("dataSource1", fakeDataSource.getFakeProperty());
}
}
Let's assume we have an application that can be customized for some customers. The application is using Java-based spring configuration (a.k.a. Java config) for dependency injection. The application consists of modules and their submodules. Each module and submodule has its own #Configuration class which is imported by parent configuration using #Import. This creates the following hierarchy:
MainConfig
----------+---------------- ....
| |
ModuleAConfig ModuleBConfig
|--------------------|
| |
SubModuleA1Config SubModuleA2Config
For example ModuleAConfig looks like this:
#Configuration
#Import({SubModuleA1Config.class, SubModuleA2Config.class})
public class ModuleAConfig {
// some module level beans
}
Let's say that SubModuleA1Config defines bean someBean of type SomeBean:
#Configuration
public class SubModuleA1Config {
#Bean
public SomeBean someBean() { return new SomeBean(); }
}
Now I want to customize the application for Customer1 (C1) - I want to use C1SomeBean (extending SomeBean) instead of SomeBean as someBean.
How can I achieve this with minimum duplication?
One of my ideas was to prepare alternative hierarchy with C1Config inheriting from MainConfig, C1ModuleAConfig from ModuleAConfig and C1SubModuleA1Config from SubModuleA1Config. C1SubModuleA1Config would override someBean() method returning C1SomeBean. Unfortunately with Spring 4.0.6 I get something like:
Overriding bean definition for bean 'someBean': replacing [someBean defined in class C1SubmoduleA1Config] with [someBean defined in class SubModuleA1Config]
and indeed SomeBean class is returned from context instead of C1SomeBean. This is clearly not what I want.
Note that you cannot override #Import extending configuration classes.
If you want to select which imports to use at runtime, you could use a #ImportSelector instead.
However, #Configuration classes are not more that spring (scoped) managed factories so as you already have a factory method for someBean you don't need to go even further:
#Configuration
public class SubModuleA1Config {
#Autowired
private Environment env;
#Bean
public SomeBean someBean() {
String customerProperty = env.getProperty("customer");
if ("C1".equals(customerProperty))
return new C1SomeBean();
return new SomeBean();
}
}
Update
Using a ImportSelector:
class CustomerImportSelector implements ImportSelector, EnvironmentAware {
private static final String PACKAGE = "org.example.config";
private static final String CONFIG_CLASS = "SubModuleConfig";
private Environment env;
#Override
public String[] selectImports(AnnotationMetadata importingClassMetadata) {
String customer = env.getProperty("customer");
return new String[] { PACKAGE + "." + customer + "." + CONFIG_CLASS };
}
#Override
public void setEnvironment(Environment environment) {
this.env = environment;
}
}
#Configuration
#Import(CustomerImportSelector.class)
public class ModuleAConfig {
// some module level beans
}
However, as every customer has a a separate package, consider also using #ComponentScan. This will pick the configuration class present and don't need a extra configuration property.
#Configuration
#ComponentScan(basePackages="org.example.customer")
public class SubModuleA1Config {
#Autowired
private CustomerFactory customerFactory;
#Bean
public SomeBean someBean() {
return customerFactory.someBean();
}
}
public interface CustomerFactory {
SomeBean someBean();
}
#Component
public class C1CustomerFactory implements CustomerFactory {
#Override
public SomeBean someBean() {
return new C1SomeBean();
}
}
I am stuck with null values in an autowired property. I am hoping I could get some help.
We are using for the project spring-boot version 0.5.0.M6.
The four configuration files with beans are in one package and are sorted by "area":
Data source configuration
Global method security configuration (as we use Spring-ACL)
MVC configuration
Spring Security configuration
The main method that bootstraps everything is in the following file:
#EnableAspectJAutoProxy
#EnableSpringConfigured
#EnableAutoConfiguration(exclude = {
DataSourceTransactionManagerAutoConfiguration.class,
HibernateJpaAutoConfiguration.class,
JpaRepositoriesAutoConfiguration.class,
SecurityAutoConfiguration.class,
ThymeleafAutoConfiguration.class,
ErrorMvcAutoConfiguration.class,
MessageSourceAutoConfiguration.class,
WebSocketAutoConfiguration.class
})
#Configuration
#ComponentScan
public class IntegrationsImcApplication {
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
ApplicationContext ctx = SpringApplication.run(
IntegrationsImcApplication.c lass, args);
}
}
The first file that holds the data source configuration beans is as follows (I have omitted some method body parts to make it more readable):
#EnableTransactionManagement(mode = AdviceMode.ASPECTJ)
#Configuration
public class RootDataSourceConfig
extends TomcatDataSourceConfiguration
implements TransactionManagementConfigurer {
#Override
public DataSource dataSource() {
return jpaDataSource();
}
public PlatformTransactionManager annotationDrivenTransactionManager() {
return jpaTransactionManager();
}
#Bean
public HibernateExceptionTranslator hibernateExceptionTranslator() {
return new HibernateExceptionTranslator();
}
#Bean(name="jpaDataSource")
public DataSource jpaDataSource() {......}
#Bean(name = {"transactionManager","txMgr"})
public JpaTransactionManager jpaTransactionManager() {......}
#Bean(name = "entityManagerFactory")
public EntityManagerFactory jpaEmf() {......}
}
And here is the next configuration file, that depends on the data source from above. It has about 20 beans related to ACL configuration, but it fails on the firsts bean that uses data source:
#EnableGlobalMethodSecurity(prePostEnabled = true)
#Configuration
public class RootGlobalMethodSecurityConfig
extends GlobalMethodSecurityConfiguration
implements Ordered {
#Autowired
public DataSource dataSource;
#Override
public int getOrder() {
return IntegrationsImcApplication.ROOT_METHOD_SECURITY_CO NFIG_ORDER;
}
#Bean
public MutableAclService aclService()
throws CacheException, IOException {
MutableJdbcAclService aclService = new MutableJdbcAclService(
dataSource, aclLookupStrategy(), aclCache());
aclService.setClassIdentityQuery("SELECT ##IDENTITY");
aclService.setSidIdentityQuery("SELECT ##IDENTITY");
return aclService;
}
...................................
}
Basically invoking aclService() throws an error as dataSource is null. We have tried ordering the configuration files by implementing the Ordered interface. We also tried using #AutoConfigureAfter(RootDataSourceConfig.class) but this did not help either. Instead of doing #Autowired on the DataSource we also tried injecting the RootDataSourceConfig class itself, but it was still null. We tried using #DependsOn and #Ordered on those beans but again no success. It seems like nothing can be injected into this configuration.
The console output at the startup is listing the beans in the order we want them, with data source being the first. We are pretty much blocked by this.
Is there anything weird or unique we are doing here that is not working? If this is as designed, then how could we inject data source differently?
Repo: github
Eager initialization of a bean that depends on a DataSource is definitely the problem. The root cause is nothing to do with Spring Boot or autoconfiguration, but rather plain old-fashioned chicken and egg - method security is applied via an aspect which is wrapped around your business beans by a BeanPostProcessor. A bean can only be post processed by something that is initialized very early. In this case it is too early to have the DataSource injected (actually the #Configuration class that needs the DataSource is instantiated too early to be wrapped properly in the #Configuration processing machinery, so it cannot be autowired). My proposal (which only gets you to the same point with the missing AuthenticationManager) is to declare the GlobalMethodSecurityConfiguration as a nested class instead of the one that the DataSource is needed in:
#EnableGlobalMethodSecurity(prePostEnabled = true)
#Configuration
protected static class ActualMethodSecurityConfiguration extends GlobalMethodSecurityConfiguration {
#Autowired
#Qualifier("aclDaoAuthenticationProvider")
private AuthenticationProvider aclDaoAuthenticationProvider;
#Autowired
#Qualifier("aclAnonymousAuthenticationProvider")
private AnonymousAuthenticationProvider aclAnonymousAuthenticationProvider;
#Autowired
#Qualifier("aclExpressionHandler")
private MethodSecurityExpressionHandler aclExpressionHandler;
#Override
protected void configure(AuthenticationManagerBuilder auth)
throws Exception {
auth.authenticationProvider(aclDaoAuthenticationProvider);
auth.authenticationProvider(aclAnonymousAuthenticationProvider);
}
#Override
public MethodSecurityExpressionHandler createExpressionHandler() {
return aclExpressionHandler;
}
}
i.e. stick that inside the RootMethodSecurityConfiguration and remove the #EnableGlobalMethodSecurity annotation from that class.
I might have resolved the problem.
GlobalMethodSecurityConfiguration.class has the following setter that tries to autowire permission evaluators:
#Autowired(required = false)
public void setPermissionEvaluator(List<PermissionEvaluator> permissionEvaluators) {
....
}
And in my case the aclPermissionEvaluator() bean needs aclService() bean, which in turn depends on another autowired property: dataSource. Which seems not to be autowired yet.
To fix this I implemented BeanFactoryAware and get dataSource from beanFactory instead:
public class RootMethodSecurityConfiguration extends GlobalMethodSecurityConfiguration implements BeanFactoryAware {
private DataSource dataSource;
#Override
public void setBeanFactory(BeanFactory beanFactory) throws BeansException {
this.dataSource = beanFactory.getBean("dataSource", DataSource.class);
}
....
}
After this, other exception showed up, whereSecurityAutoConfiguration.class is complaining about missing AuthenticationManager, so I just excluded it from #EnableAutoConfiguration. I am not sure if its ideal, but I have custom security configuration, so this way everything works ok.