I am using neo4-jdbc with pool lib BasicDataSource.
I had huge latency problems so we profiled the app and we found out that opening connection is the cause. I didnt understand why open-connection takes so long we using pool. this is screenshot from our profiles:
This is how the Neo4jDatasourceRemote looks like:
package com.comp.wm.common.repo;
import com.comp.wm.common.utils.Constants;
import org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSource;
import org.apache.log4j.Logger;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Value;
import javax.annotation.PostConstruct;
import java.sql.Connection;
import java.sql.SQLException;
private final Logger logger = Logger.getLogger(Neo4jDataSourceRemote.class);
private BasicDataSource ds;
#Value("${neo4j.host:localhost}")
private String NEO4J_HOST;
#Value("${neo4j.port:7474}")
private String NEO4J_PORT;
#Value("${neo4j.username:nouser}")
private String NEO4J_USERNAME;
#Value("${neo4j.password:nopass}")
private String NEO4J_PASSWORD;
#Value("${neo4j.pool.size:200}")
private int NEO4J_POOL_SIZE;
private String GetUrl() {
return String.format(Constants.NEO4J_JDBC_CONNECTIVITY_STRING, NEO4J_HOST, NEO4J_PORT);
}
#PostConstruct
public void init(){
ds = new BasicDataSource();
ds.setInitialSize(300);
ds.setDriverClassName("org.neo4j.jdbc.Driver");
ds.setUrl(GetUrl());
ds.setUsername(NEO4J_USERNAME);
ds.setPassword(NEO4J_PASSWORD);
}
#Override
public Connection openConnection() throws SQLException {
return this.ds.getConnection();
}
#Override
public void closeConnection(Connection conn) {
try {
if (conn != null)
conn.close();
} catch (SQLException ex) {
logger.info("error closing connection", ex);
}
}
}
and this is a sample of how I execute query against the graph:
public List<NearbyItem> executeQuery(..) {
conn = neo4jDataSource.openConnection();
String getUsersStatement = "some query..";
try (PreparedStatement ps = conn.prepareStatement(getUsersStatement)) {
..
ResultSet rs = ps.executeQuery();
while (rs.next()) {
...
}
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new RuntimeException("Error returning userId=" + userIdInput, e);
} finally {
neo4jDataSource.closeConnection(conn);
}
return distItemDatas;
}
any ideas?
Based on comments above, I'll add this as a reply.
By default Neo4j runs in the http interface 10 threads for core. You can tweak the total number of threads in neo4j-server.properties
org.neo4j.server.webserver.maxthreads=200
However the more threads you have the more you're suffering from context switches and lock contention. If you increase the number of threads I won't expect a large increase of throughput, you just shift the point where you have to wait. From initialization (openCOnnection) to processing the query.
Related
I have a Java application that has a GUI made with Swing and that uses two databases interchangeably. One of the two databases is mongoDB and the other one is MySQL. Which database to use is chosen with a command line option. For the MySQL database I am also using Hibernate and JPA. The code I have looks like this:
import picocli.CommandLine;
import picocli.CommandLine.Command;
import picocli.CommandLine.Option;
import java.awt.EventQueue;
import java.util.concurrent.Callable;
import javax.persistence.EntityManager;
import javax.persistence.EntityManagerFactory;
import javax.persistence.Persistence;
import org.apache.logging.log4j.Level;
import org.apache.logging.log4j.LogManager;
import org.apache.logging.log4j.Logger;
#Command(mixinStandardHelpOptions = true)
public class App implements Callable<Void> {
private static final Logger LOGGER = LogManager.getLogger(App.class);
#Option(names = { "--database" }, description = "'mongo' or 'mysql'")
private String databaseType = "mysql";
public static void main(String[] args) {
new CommandLine(new App()).execute(args);
}
#Override
public Void call() throws Exception {
EventQueue.invokeLater(() -> {
switch (databaseType) {
case "mysql":
EntityManagerFactory emf;
EntityManager entityManager;
try {
emf = Persistence.createEntityManagerFactory("name");
entityManager = emf.createEntityManager();
// other stuff
} catch (Exception e) {
LOGGER.log(Level.ERROR, "MySQL Exception", e);
}
break;
case "mongo":
// mongo stuff, no EntityManagerFactory here
break;
default:
LOGGER.log(Level.ERROR, "--database must be either 'mysql' or 'mongo'");
System.exit(1);
}
//...
try {
View view = new View();
view.setVisible(true);
} catch (Exception e) {
LOGGER.log(Level.ERROR, "Exception", e);
}
});
return null;
}
In mysql case I am creating an EntityManagerFactory and an EntityManager. The entityManager created here is passed as argument to the constructor of the repositories and used throughout the whole life of the application.
I was wondering what is the best practice about closing the entityManager and the factory.
Searching in the documentation I found this:
Closing an EntityManagerFactory should not be taken lightly. It is
much better to keep a factory open for a long period of time than to
repeatedly create and close new factories. Thus, most applications
will never close the factory, or only close it when the application is
exiting.
So I was wondering, what is the difference between closing the factory and entity manager at application shutdown and not closing it? Also in my case I'm declaring emf and entityManager inside the mysql case since are not required for mongodb. In order to close them at application shutdown what should I do? I found something about Runtime.getRuntime().addShutdownHook(). I tried using it like the code below, but it seems like it is not working.
try {
emf = Persistence.createEntityManagerFactory("name");
entityManager = emf.createEntityManager();
Thread closeHook = new Thread(() -> {
if (emf != null) {
entityManager.close();
emf.close();
LOGGER.log(Level.INFO, "Close entity manager and entity manager factory");
}
});
Runtime.getRuntime().addShutdownHook(closeHook);
// other stuff
} catch (Exception e) {
LOGGER.log(Level.ERROR, "MySQL Exception", e);
}
Short answer, yes, it should be closed. And the reason can be found at this answer:
The JVM will release all active resources upon termination; however, this does not ensure that the other end will free the resource too, so explicitly closing resources is in every programmer's best interest.
So in my case, it is true that the EntityManager and factory are closed at application shutdown, but this does not ensure that they are properly dealt with on the other end.
I didn't mention it in my question, but in fact the same thing holds true for the Mongo Client as well (see this answer):
If you ever re-deploy your web application without first restarting your application server, you must ensure that the MongoClient is closed when your web application is shutdown.
About the implementation I made an interface that I called DBInitializer. I instantiated an object of type MongoInitializer or MySQLInitializer (both implementing DBInitializer) inside the main method. See code for more clarity.
DBInitializer:
public interface DBInitializer {
public void startDbConnection();
public void closeDbConnection();
}
MySQLInitializer:
import javax.persistence.EntityManager;
import javax.persistence.EntityManagerFactory;
import javax.persistence.Persistence;
public class MySQLInitializer implements DBInitializer {
private EntityManagerFactory emf;
private EntityManager entityManager;
private final Logger logger = LogManager.getLogger(MySQLInitializer.class);
#Override
public void startDbConnection() {
try {
emf = Persistence.createEntityManagerFactory("name");
entityManager = emf.createEntityManager();
// other stuff
} catch (Exception e) {
logger.log(Level.ERROR, "MySQL Exception", e);
}
}
#Override
public void closeDbConnection() {
if (emf != null) {
entityManager.close();
emf.close();
}
}
}
MongoInitializer:
import com.mongodb.MongoClient;
import com.mongodb.ServerAddress;
public class MongoInitializer implements DBInitializer {
private MongoClient client;
private final Logger logger = LogManager.getLogger(MongoInitializer.class);
#Override
public void startDbConnection() {
try {
client = new MongoClient(new ServerAddress("localhost", 27017));
// other stuff
} catch (Exception e) {
logger.log(Level.ERROR, "Mongo Exception", e);
}
}
#Override
public void closeDbConnection() {
client.close();
}
}
App:
import java.awt.EventQueue;
import java.util.concurrent.Callable;
import DBInitializer;
import MongoInitializer;
import MySQLInitializer;
import View;
import picocli.CommandLine;
import picocli.CommandLine.Command;
import picocli.CommandLine.Option;
#Command(mixinStandardHelpOptions = true)
public class App implements Callable<Void> {
private static final Logger LOGGER = LogManager.getLogger(App.class);
#Option(names = { "--database" }, description = "Either 'mongo' or 'mysql'")
private String databaseType = "mysql";
public static void main(String[] args) {
new CommandLine(new App()).execute(args);
}
DBInitializer dBInitializer;
#Override
public Void call() throws Exception {
EventQueue.invokeLater(() -> {
try {
switch (databaseType) {
case "mysql":
dBInitializer = new MySQLInitializer();
break;
case "mongo":
dBInitializer = new MongoInitializer();
break;
default:
LOGGER.log(Level.ERROR, "--database must be either 'mysql' or 'mongo'");
System.exit(1);
}
dBInitializer.startDbConnection();
// other stuff
View view = new View();
view.setVisible(true);
} catch (Exception e) {
LOGGER.log(Level.ERROR, "Exception", e);
}
});
Runtime.getRuntime().addShutdownHook(new Thread() {
#Override
public void run() {
dBInitializer.closeDbConnection();
}
});
return null;
}
}
what is the difference between closing the factory and entity manager at application shutdown and not closing it?
A potential resource leak (e.g. an unclosed connection pool) vs lack thereof. Also:
I tried using it like the code below, but it seems like it is not working.
Why not use a try-with-resources statement?
how to solve this problem and what is wrong in this code?
i know that the question has been asked before but i cant solve the problem
private void cb_categoriesPopupMenuWillBecomeVisible(javax.swing.event.PopupMenuEvent evt) {
cb_categories.removeAllItems();
try {
String sql_c = "SELECT * FROM inventory.categories";
cc.pst = cc.c.prepareStatement(sql_c);
cc.rs = cc.pst.executeQuery();
while (cc.rs.next()) {
String c_name = cc.rs.getString("CategoryName");
cb_categories.addItem(c_name);
}
} catch (Exception e) {
JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(null, e);
} finally {
try {
cc.rs.close();
cc.pst.close();
} catch (Exception e) {
}
}
}
Your ResultSet and PreparedStatement are not declared in method scope, so I have to assume that you've declared them elsewhere.
That's a big mistake.
You should declare the Statement and ResultSet in method scope.
You make an attempt to close your resources, but you should wrap them in individual try/catch blocks. You cannot risk one being closed and not the other.
There are other things I'd criticize about your code (e.g. SELECT *, mingling UI and database code together in a single class), but that's enough to start.
Start with an interface:
package persistence;
import java.util.List;
/**
* Created by Michael
* Creation date 8/20/2017.
* #link https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45787151/com-mysql-jdbc-exception-jdbc4-mysqlnontransientconnectionexception-no-operatio/45787321?noredirect=1#comment78532554_45787321
*/
public interface CategoryDao {
List<String> findAllCategories();
}
Then write a concrete implementation:
package database;
import database.util.DatabaseUtils;
import org.apache.commons.logging.Log;
import org.apache.commons.logging.LogFactory;
import javax.sql.DataSource;
import java.sql.PreparedStatement;
import java.sql.ResultSet;
import java.sql.SQLException;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
/**
* Created by Michael
* Creation date 8/20/2017.
* #link https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45787151/com-mysql-jdbc-exception-jdbc4-mysqlnontransientconnectionexception-no-operatio/45787321?noredirect=1#comment78532554_45787321
*/
public class CategoryDaoImpl implements CategoryDao {
private static final Log LOGGER = LogFactory.getLog(CategoryDaoImpl.class);
private static String SELECT_CATEGORIES = "SELECT CategoryName from inventory.Categories ";
private DataSource dataSource;
public CategoryDaoImpl(DataSource dataSource) {
this.dataSource = dataSource;
}
#Override
public List<String> findAllCategories() {
List<String> categories = new ArrayList<>();
PreparedStatement ps = null;
ResultSet rs = null;
try {
ps = this.dataSource.getConnection().prepareStatement(SELECT_CATEGORIES);
rs = ps.executeQuery();
while (rs.next()) {
categories.add(rs.getString("CategoryName"));
}
} catch (SQLException e) {
LOGGER.error(String.format("Exception caught while selecting all category names"), e);
} finally {
DatabaseUtils.close(rs);
DatabaseUtils.close(ps);
}
return categories;
}
}
This is something that you can test with JUnit off to the side. Get it running perfectly, then give a reference to your UI code. It'll keep the UI and database code separate. You can use this DAO in any application without worrying about Swing or web UI.
I have an JPS Project.
If I have different computers using the system, they use the same MySQL connection.
When the system is running any query and a client tries to make any mysql command, it puts everyone in a queue, the system is very slow.
I want each client has a different connection with mysql.
Sorry if I was not clear enough.
package br.com.scope.model;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.io.InputStream;
import java.sql.Connection;
import java.sql.DriverManager;
import java.sql.PreparedStatement;
import java.sql.SQLException;
import java.sql.Statement;
import java.util.Properties;
import org.springframework.context.annotation.Scope;
import org.springframework.context.annotation.ScopedProxyMode;
import br.com.scope.log.LoggerIntegrador;
public class ConexaoMysql {
private static Connection connection;
private final static ConexaoMysql conexaoMysql = new ConexaoMysql();
private static Properties prop;
private LoggerIntegrador logger;
private ConexaoMysql() {
super();
prop = new Properties();
Class<? extends ConexaoMysql> cls = this.getClass();
InputStream is = cls.getResourceAsStream("db.properties");
try {
prop.load(is);
} catch (IOException e) {
logger = LoggerIntegrador.getInstance();
logger.error(e.getMessage(), e);
}
}
public static ConexaoMysql getConnection() throws SQLException, ClassNotFoundException, IOException {
if (connection == null || connection.isClosed()){
conexaoMysql.abreConexao();
}
return conexaoMysql;
}
public static void beginTransaction() throws SQLException, ClassNotFoundException, IOException {
getConnection();
connection.setAutoCommit(false);
}
public static void commit() throws SQLException {
connection.commit();
connection.setAutoCommit(true);
}
public static String getDriver() {
return prop.getProperty("driver");
}
public static String getConnectionString() {
return prop.getProperty("connectionstring");
}
public static String getUser() {
return prop.getProperty("user");
}
public static String getPassword() {
return prop.getProperty("password");
}
private void abreConexao() throws ClassNotFoundException, SQLException, IOException{
Class.forName(getDriver());
connection = DriverManager.getConnection(
getConnectionString(),
getUser(),
getPassword());
}
public static void fechaConexao() throws SQLException {
if (!connection.isClosed()) {
connection.close();
}
}
public PreparedStatement getPreparedStatement(String sql) throws SQLException {
return connection.prepareStatement(sql, Statement.RETURN_GENERATED_KEYS);
}
public static int getId() {
return conexaoMysql.hashCode();
}
}
What you're looking for is a connection pool. It is a bounded pool of connections that the clients can take a connection from when they need it, and put it back to when done. This saves you from the overhead or creating and destroying connections all the time. It also makes sure the number of connections grows predictably.
Most containers provide a facility like this e.g. here's the documentation for configuring a connection pool in Tomcat. Find the one for your container.
If for some reason you can not use that or do not want the container to be in charge, you can use a library that helps you manage a connection pool yourself, in your application. c3p0 is a popular one with many examples on the web.
EDIT:
Hikari is the new cool choice for connection pooling.
I'm working on web java application with OSGI. I get this error when I try to open JSF page: java.lang.reflect.UndeclaredThrowableException
This is the source code that I'm working on:
package org.DX_57.osgi.SH_27.impl;
import java.sql.Connection;
import java.sql.PreparedStatement;
import java.sql.ResultSet;
import java.sql.SQLException;
import javax.annotation.Resource;
import javax.sql.DataSource;
import org.DX_57.osgi.SH_27.api.SessionHandle;
public class SessionHandleImpl implements SessionHandle {
#Resource(name="jdbc/Oracle")
public DataSource ds;
public String sayHello(String name) {
return "Howdy " + name;
}
public String CheckUserDB(String userToCheck){
String storedPassword = null;
String error_Message = null;
String SQL_Statement = null;
String error_Database;
Connection conn;
try {
conn = ds.getConnection();
try {
conn.setAutoCommit(false);
boolean committed = false;
try {
SQL_Statement = "SELECT Passwd from USERS WHERE Username = ?";
PreparedStatement passwordQuery = conn.prepareStatement(SQL_Statement);
passwordQuery.setString(1, userToCheck);
ResultSet result = passwordQuery.executeQuery();
if(result.next()){
storedPassword = result.getString("Passwd");
}
conn.commit();
committed = true;
} finally {
if (!committed) conn.rollback();
}
}
finally {
conn.close();
}
} catch (SQLException ex) {
ex.printStackTrace();
}
return storedPassword;
}
}
This is the error stack of the Glassfish server: http://pastebin.com/tvHmspjh
I can successfully compile the code but when I try to open JSF page I get error. Maybe I have mistaken the try-catch statements.
Best wishes
now I got some trouble connecting to my database. I know the tables i am looking for exist because when I access them with the command line they can be queried.
Probably some minor oversight but I would love some help.
This is where I make my connection to my database
package persistence;
import java.sql.DriverManager;
import java.sql.Connection;
import java.sql.SQLException;
public class DBRegistry {
private static DBRegistry db = null;
private static Connection connection = null;
private DBRegistry() {};
public static synchronized DBRegistry getUniqueInstance() {
if (db == null) {
db = new DBRegistry();
return db;
}
else return db;
}
public synchronized Connection getDBConnection() {
try {
Class.forName("org.sqlite.JDBC");
connection = DriverManager.getConnection("jdbc:sqlite:src/database/taskMan.db");
return connection;
}
catch (SQLException e) {e.printStackTrace();}
catch (ClassNotFoundException e) {e.printStackTrace();}
return null;
}
public synchronized void closeConnection() {
try {
connection.close();
} catch (SQLException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
Here is how I query it
public void create(UUID oid, Object obj) {
Task t = (Task)obj;
String statement = "INSERT INTO `complexTask` (`oid`,`description`,`status`) VALUES (?, ?, ?)";
try {
PreparedStatement dbStatement = db.prepareStatement(statement);
dbStatement.setString(1, oid.toString());
dbStatement.setString(2, t.getDescription());
dbStatement.setBoolean(3, t.getStatus());
dbStatement.executeUpdate();
} catch (SQLException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
and finally a stack trace:
java.sql.SQLException: no such table: complexTask
at org.sqlite.DB.throwex(DB.java:288)
at org.sqlite.NativeDB.prepare(Native Method)
at org.sqlite.DB.prepare(DB.java:114)
at org.sqlite.PrepStmt.<init>(PrepStmt.java:37)
at org.sqlite.Conn.prepareStatement(Conn.java:231)
at org.sqlite.Conn.prepareStatement(Conn.java:224)
at org.sqlite.Conn.prepareStatement(Conn.java:213)
at persistence.framework.ComplexTaskRDBMapper.create(ComplexTaskRDBMapper.java:23)
at persistence.PersistanceFacade.create(PersistanceFacade.java:49)
at persistence.persistanceStates.NewState.commit(NewState.java:10)
at persistence.PersistentObject.commit(PersistentObject.java:23)
at domain.objects.Task.commitToDB(Task.java:89)
at domain.TaskRepository.commitToDB(TaskRepository.java:60)
at domain.TaskController.persistanceCommit(TaskController.java:97)
at presentation.TaskControlsJPanel$3.actionPerformed(TaskControlsJPanel.java:127)
at javax.swing.AbstractButton.fireActionPerformed(AbstractButton.java:2012)
at javax.swing.AbstractButton$Handler.actionPerformed(AbstractButton.java:2335)
at javax.swing.DefaultButtonModel.fireActionPerformed(DefaultButtonModel.java:404)
at javax.swing.DefaultButtonModel.setPressed(DefaultButtonModel.java:259)
at javax.swing.plaf.basic.BasicButtonListener.mouseReleased(BasicButtonListener.java:253)
at java.awt.Component.processMouseEvent(Component.java:6175)
at javax.swing.JComponent.processMouseEvent(JComponent.java:3267)
at java.awt.Component.processEvent(Component.java:5940)
at java.awt.Container.processEvent(Container.java:2105)
at java.awt.Component.dispatchEventImpl(Component.java:4536)
at java.awt.Container.dispatchEventImpl(Container.java:2163)
at java.awt.Component.dispatchEvent(Component.java:4362)
at java.awt.LightweightDispatcher.retargetMouseEvent(Container.java:4461)
at java.awt.LightweightDispatcher.processMouseEvent(Container.java:4125)
at java.awt.LightweightDispatcher.dispatchEvent(Container.java:4055)
at java.awt.Container.dispatchEventImpl(Container.java:2149)
at java.awt.Window.dispatchEventImpl(Window.java:2478)
at java.awt.Component.dispatchEvent(Component.java:4362)
at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEvent(EventQueue.java:604)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpOneEventForFilters(EventDispatchThread.java:275)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForFilter(EventDispatchThread.java:200)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForHierarchy(EventDispatchThread.java:190)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:185)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:177)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(EventDispatchThread.java:138)
And some JUnit code for good measure, the first test passes and the second fails with a similar error to the one above
package test.persistence;
import java.sql.Connection;
import java.sql.PreparedStatement;
import java.sql.SQLException;
import persistence.DBRegistry;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
public class TestDBRegistry extends TestCase {
public void testDBRegistryConnection() {
Connection con = DBRegistry.getUniqueInstance().getDBConnection();
assertNotNull(con);
}
public void testTableQuery() throws SQLException {
Connection con = DBRegistry.getUniqueInstance().getDBConnection();
PreparedStatement dbStatement = con.prepareStatement("SELECT COUNT(*) FROM `singleTask`");
assertEquals("should be 1 for successful query", 1, dbStatement.executeQuery());
}
I notice that in both your unit test and your other code you are using back-ticks around the table name. In the latest version of sqlite, this is fine but in older versions it wasn't handled as well I believe. Can you try removing the ticks around the table name or maybe changing them to regular quotes rather than back-ticks?
If that doesn't solve it I would check to be absolutely sure that you are pointing to the correct db file. If you specify a filename that doesn't exist you won't get an error, it will simply create a new database there. I'm not sure what the "current directory" is under the context of your app or unit test but be sure it is pointing to where you think it is. To test this, you could change the db file name to foo.db, run the unit test, then search your machine for foo.db to see where it got created. That will tell you where your app is working off of.
I'm not sure your JDBC connection string is quite right. The connection string you use ends with taskMan.db, but your comment above implies that the name of the database file is taskManDb.db (note the extra Db).
It might not fix your problem with the SQL INSERT, but I don't care at all for your DBRegistry implementation. I'd write it like this:
package persistence;
import java.sql.Connection;
import java.sql.DriverManager;
import java.sql.ResultSet;
import java.sql.SQLException;
import java.sql.Statement;
public class DBRegistry
{
public static Connection getConnection(String driver, String url, String username, String password) throws ClassNotFoundException, SQLException
{
Class.forName(driver);
return DriverManager.getConnection(url, username, password);
}
public static void close(Connection connection)
{
try
{
if (connection != null)
{
connection.close();
}
}
catch (SQLException e)
{
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
public static void close(Statement statement)
{
try
{
if (statement != null)
{
statement.close();
}
}
catch (SQLException e)
{
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
public static void close(ResultSet resultSet)
{
try
{
if (resultSet != null)
{
resultSet.close();
}
}
catch (SQLException e)
{
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
Maybe your table is in a package. so you might have do something like
select * from Tasks.ComplextTask
('Tasks' being the package)
Now just try to find a file with the same name in c:\windows\system32 and you will find it. It tells to us that your path is not correct. Have a nice day;
Please Commit your Connection after created table and after insertion.