I would like to work with unmarshalled document for comfort reasons, but I also need to have access to the original source XML Elements (to access empty text nodes, because some cryptography is involved). Is there a way to achieve this with JAXB2 (preferably using a maven plugin) or do I need to unmarshall the contents manually?
JAXB isn't going to differentiate between empty and missing nodes, the unmarshalled object is going to have nulls in either case, so if there is a semantic difference between the two, think you'll have to manually parse or use a different parser that can give you the insight you need (not sure, SAX parser might).
Related
I have an XML Document built programatically and waiting for serialisation (as a String). Before serialising it though, I would like to re-arrange its nodes so that they match the definition of the DTD. I should mention that my implementation prevents me to know in which order the tree will be built.
Any recommended solutions for this ?
There is some academic research to correct invalid XML:
Correction of Invalid XML Documents with Respect to Single Type Tree
Grammars
but I don't know if there is any available library for that.
So you need to do it by hand, or better rework the generation of the document so that it produces a valid instance in the first place.
There is an XML file hosted on a server that I want to parse. Normally I generate an XSD from the XML and then generate the java pojo's from this XSD. Using jackson I then parse the XML to a java object representation. Is it not more straightforward to just use xpath ? This means I do not need to generate a object hierarchy based on the XML and also I do not need to regenerate the object hierarchy if the XML changes. xpath seems much more concise and intuitive ?
Why should I use XSD , object generation instead of xpath ?
According to the XML Schema specification XSD is used for defining the structure, content and semantics of XML documents. This means that you can use XSD to validate your XML file.
Depending on your circumstances you might be able to do without generating the whole object tree if all you need is to get some values from the XML file. In this case XPath is the way to go. However, you still might want to have an XSD file in order to validate the XML file before parsing it. This way you make your software fail fast, when the structure of your XML file changes, which will suggest that you change your XPath expressions. But for this to work, you shouldn't use the XSD you generate from your XML file, instead you should have a separate pre-generated XSD file which complies with the XPath expressions.
I think both approaches are valid, depending on the circumstances.
At the end of the day, you want to extract the values from that remote xml file and do something with them.
First criteria to consider is the size of that file, and the number of data elements.
If it's just a few, then xpath extraction should be straightforward. However, if that xml file represent a sizable and/or complex data structure, then you probably want the de-serialization to a Java data structure that you can then utilize, and JAXB would be a good candidate.
JAXB is going to be easier/better if the remote server adheres or publishes an XML Schema. If it doesn't, and changes often and significantly, you're going to suffer either way, but particularly so with JAXB. There are ways to smooth things over by pre-processing that xml with XSLT to force it into a more reliable form, but that is going to be a partial solution most likely.
I have an xml stored in database table. i need to get the xml and modify few elements and put the xml back in the database.
I am thinking to use JDOM or JAXB to modify the xml elements. Could you please suggest which one is better regarding the performance?
Thanks!
JAXB and JDOM and completely different things. JAXB will serialize java objects into an XML format and vice versa. JDOM simply reads in the XML file and stores it in a DOM tree which can then be used to modify the xml itself. So better if you go for JDOM.
JAXB is to be used when you have objects where the attribute values are stored in XML hence you can parse an xml document and it gives you a java objects and then you can write these back.
Quite a bit of work if you want to simple change some values. And it doesn't work with arbitrary xml files, JAXB has it's own format linked to your object's definitions.
JDOM creates also objects but the objects used are XML objects like Element, NodeList, ...
If you just want to change some values -> why not reading the xml file as a plain text file and use string operations to make your changes.
Or of the modification is more logicaly defined -> use an XSLT and a stylesheet translator.
Googling for XSLT and Java will give you tons of examples.
I need to parse a xml file using JAVA and have to create a bean out of that xml file after parsing .
I need this while using Spring JMS in which producer is producing a xml file .First I need to read the xml file and take action according .
I read some thing about parsing and come with these option
xpath
DOM
Which ll be the best option to parse the xml file.
did you check JAXB
There's three ways of parsing an XML file, SAX, DOM and StAX.
DOM will parse the whole file and build up a tree in memory - great for small files but obviously if this is huge then you don't want the entire tree just sitting in memory! SAX is event based - it doesn't load anything into memory per-se but just fires off a series of events as it reads through the file. StAX is a median between the two, the application moves the cursor forward as it needs, grabbing the data as it goes (so no event firing or huge memory consumption.)
What one you use will really depend on your application - all have built in libraries since Java 6.
Looks like, you receive a serialized object via Java messaging. Have a look first, how the object is being serialized. Usually this is done with a library (jaxb, axis, ...) and you could use the very same library to create a deserializer.
You will need:
The xml schema (a xsd file)
The Java bean class (very helpful, it should exist)
Then, usually the library will create all helper classes and files and you don't have to care about parsing.
if you need to create an object, just extract the needed properties and go on...
I recommend using StaX, see this tutorial for more information.
Umh..there are several ways you can parse an xml document to into memory and work with it. You mentioned DOM. DOM actually holds uploads the whole document into memory and then allows you to move between different branches of the XML document.
On the other hand, you could use StAX. It works similar to DOM. The only difference is that, it streams the content of the XML document thus allowing better allocation of memory. On the other hand, it does not retain the information that has already been read.
Look at : http://download.oracle.com/javaee/5/tutorial/doc/bnbem.html It gives details about both parsing methods and example code. Hope that helps.
I'm new to Castor and data binding in general. I'm working on an application that, in part, needs to take data off of a socket and unmarshall the data to make POJOs. Now, I've got the socket stuff down, and I've even generated and compiled java files thanks to Ant and Castor.
Here's the problem: the data stream that I'll receive could be one of about 9 different objects. That is, I receive a stream of text (XML) that represents an object with stuff that I'll operate on; again, depending on the object type. If it were just one object, it'd be easy: call the unmarshall commands on it and go on my merry way. But, since it could be one of many kinds of objects, who do I know what to unmarshall? I read up on mapping, but either I didn't get it, or it seems like a static mapping, not a dynamic mapping.
Any help out there?
You are right, Castor expects a static mapping. But you can work with that. You can write some code that will modify the incoming xml so that, on your side, Castor can use one schema, and on your clients' side they don't have to change their schemas.
Change the schema that Castor expects to get to something with a common root-element, with under that your nine different alternatives for your different objects (I think you can restrict it so the schema will allow only one of the nine, if that doesn't work out you could just make all the sub-elements optional).
Then you can write code that modifies the incoming xml to wrap your incoming xml with that common root-element, then feeds the wrapped xml into a stream that gets read by the Castor unmarshaller.
There are at least 3 different ways to implement the xml-wrapping part: SAX, XSLT, and XML libraries (like JDOM, DOM4J, and XOM--I prefer XOM but any of them will work).
The SAX way is probably best if you're already familiar with SAX or if one of the other ways has worked but come up short on performance. If I had to implement that then I would create an XMLFilter that takes in xml and writes xml out, stacking that on top of another piece that writes xml to an OutputStream, and writing a wrapper method around the unmarshalling stuff to feed the incoming stream to the xmlreader, copy the OutputStream to another InputStream (an easy way is to use commons-io), and feed the new InputStream to the Castor unmarshaller.
With XSLT there is no fooling with SAX, although XSLT has a reputation for pain sometimes, it seems to me like this might be a relatively straightforward transformation, but I haven't taken a stab at it either. It is a long time since I used XSLT for anything. I am not sure about performance either, though I wouldn't write it off out of hand.
Using XOM or JDOM or DOM4J to wrap the XML is also possible, and the learning curve is a lot lower than for SAX or XSLT. The downside is the whole XML document tends to get sucked into memory at once so if you deal with big enough documents you could run out of memory.
I have a similar thing in Jibx where all of the incoming message objects implement a base interface which has a field denoting the message type.
The text/xml is serialized into the base interface and I then used the command pattern to call the respective business logic depending upon the message type which is defined in the base interface.
Not sure if this is possible using castor but take a look at Jibx as the performance is fantastic.
http://jibx.sourceforge.net/
I appreciate your insights. You both have given me some good information to go on and new knowledge that I didn't have. In the end, I got the process to work via a hack. I grab the text stream, parse out the root tag of the message, and then switch on it to determine the right object to create. I'm unmarshalling all of my objects independently and everyone is happy on our end.