They both seem to be sending data to the server inside the body, so what makes them different?
HTTP PUT:
PUT puts a file or resource at a specific URI, and exactly at that URI. If there's already a file or resource at that URI, PUT replaces that file or resource. If there is no file or resource there, PUT creates one. PUT is idempotent, but paradoxically PUT responses are not cacheable.
HTTP 1.1 RFC location for PUT
HTTP POST:
POST sends data to a specific URI and expects the resource at that URI to handle the request. The web server at this point can determine what to do with the data in the context of the specified resource. The POST method is not idempotent, however POST responses are cacheable so long as the server sets the appropriate Cache-Control and Expires headers.
The official HTTP RFC specifies POST to be:
Annotation of existing resources;
Posting a message to a bulletin board, newsgroup, mailing list,
or similar group of articles;
Providing a block of data, such as the result of submitting a
form, to a data-handling process;
Extending a database through an append operation.
HTTP 1.1 RFC location for POST
Difference between POST and PUT:
The RFC itself explains the core difference:
The fundamental difference between the
POST and PUT requests is reflected in
the different meaning of the
Request-URI. The URI in a POST request
identifies the resource that will
handle the enclosed entity. That
resource might be a data-accepting
process, a gateway to some other
protocol, or a separate entity that
accepts annotations. In contrast, the
URI in a PUT request identifies the
entity enclosed with the request --
the user agent knows what URI is
intended and the server MUST NOT
attempt to apply the request to some
other resource. If the server desires
that the request be applied to a
different URI, it MUST send a 301 (Moved Permanently) response; the user agent MAY then make
its own decision regarding whether or not to redirect the request.
Additionally, and a bit more concisely, RFC 7231 Section 4.3.4 PUT states (emphasis added),
4.3.4. PUT
The PUT method requests that the state of the target resource be
created or replaced with the state defined by the representation
enclosed in the request message payload.
Using the right method, unrelated aside:
One benefit of REST ROA vs SOAP is that when using HTTP REST ROA, it encourages the proper usage of the HTTP verbs/methods. So for example you would only use PUT when you want to create a resource at that exact location. And you would never use GET to create or modify a resource.
Only semantics.
An HTTP PUT is supposed to accept the body of the request, and then store that at the resource identified by the URI.
An HTTP POST is more general. It is supposed to initiate an action on the server. That action could be to store the request body at the resource identified by the URI, or it could be a different URI, or it could be a different action.
PUT is like a file upload. A put to a URI affects exactly that URI. A POST to a URI could have any effect at all.
To give examples of REST-style resources:
POST /books with a bunch of book information might create a new book, and respond with the new URL identifying that book: /books/5.
PUT /books/5 would have to either create a new book with the ID of 5, or replace the existing book with ID 5.
In non-resource style, POST can be used for just about anything that has a side effect. One other difference is that PUT should be idempotent: multiple PUTs of the same data to the same URL should be fine, whereas multiple POSTs might create multiple objects or whatever it is your POST action does.
GET: Retrieves data from the server. Should have no other effect.
PUT: Replaces target resource with the request payload. Can be used to update or create a new resource.
PATCH: Similar to PUT, but used to update only certain fields within an existing resource.
POST: Performs resource-specific processing on the payload. Can be used for different actions including creating a new resource, uploading a file, or submitting a web form.
DELETE: Removes data from the server.
TRACE: Provides a way to test what the server receives. It simply returns what was sent.
OPTIONS: Allows a client to get information about the request methods supported by a service. The relevant response header is Allow with supported methods. Also used in CORS as preflight request to inform the server about actual the request method and ask about custom headers.
HEAD: Returns only the response headers.
CONNECT: Used by the browser when it knows it talks to a proxy and the final URI begins with https://. The intent of CONNECT is to allow end-to-end encrypted TLS sessions, so the data is unreadable to a proxy.
PUT is meant as a a method for "uploading" stuff to a particular URI, or overwriting what is already in that URI.
POST, on the other hand, is a way of submitting data RELATED to a given URI.
Refer to the HTTP RFC
As far as i know, PUT is mostly used for update the records.
POST - To create document or any other resource
PUT - To update the created document or any other resource.
But to be clear on that PUT usually 'Replaces' the existing record if it is there and creates if it not there..
Define operations in terms of HTTP methods
The HTTP protocol defines a number of methods that assign semantic meaning to a request. The common HTTP methods used by most RESTful web APIs are:
GET retrieves a representation of the resource at the specified URI. The body of the response message contains the details of the requested resource.
POST creates a new resource at the specified URI. The body of the request message provides the details of the new resource. Note that POST can also be used to trigger operations that don't actually create resources.
PUT either creates or replaces the resource at the specified URI. The body of the request message specifies the resource to be created or updated.
PATCH performs a partial update of a resource. The request body specifies the set of changes to apply to the resource.
DELETE removes the resource at the specified URI.
The effect of a specific request should depend on whether the resource is a collection or an individual item. The following table summarizes the common conventions adopted by most RESTful implementations using the e-commerce example. Not all of these requests might be implemented—it depends on the specific scenario.
Resource
POST
GET
PUT
DELETE
/customers
Create a new customer
Retrieve all customers
Bulk update of customers
Remove all customers
/customers/1
Error
Retrieve the details for customer 1
Update the details of customer 1 if it exists
Remove customer 1
/customers/1/orders
Create a new order for customer 1
Retrieve all orders for customer 1
Bulk update of orders for customer 1
Remove all orders for customer 1
The differences between POST, PUT, and PATCH can be confusing.
A POST request creates a resource. The server assigns a URI for the new resource and returns that URI to the client. In the REST model, you frequently apply POST requests to collections. The new resource is added to the collection. A POST request can also be used to submit data for processing to an existing resource, without any new resource being created.
A PUT request creates a resource or updates an existing resource. The client specifies the URI for the resource. The request body contains a complete representation of the resource. If a resource with this URI already exists, it is replaced. Otherwise, a new resource is created, if the server supports doing so. PUT requests are most frequently applied to resources that are individual items, such as a specific customer, rather than collections. A server might support updates but not creation via PUT. Whether to support creation via PUT depends on whether the client can meaningfully assign a URI to a resource before it exists. If not, then use POST to create resources and PUT or PATCH to update.
A PATCH request performs a partial update to an existing resource. The client specifies the URI for the resource. The request body specifies a set of changes to apply to the resource. This can be more efficient than using PUT, because the client only sends the changes, not the entire representation of the resource. Technically PATCH can also create a new resource (by specifying a set of updates to a "null" resource), if the server supports this.
PUT requests must be idempotent. If a client submits the same PUT request multiple times, the results should always be the same (the same resource will be modified with the same values). POST and PATCH requests are not guaranteed to be idempotent.
Please see: http://zacharyvoase.com/2009/07/03/http-post-put-diff/
I’ve been getting pretty annoyed lately by a popular misconception by web developers that a POST is used to create a resource, and a PUT is used to update/change one.
If you take a look at page 55 of RFC 2616 (“Hypertext Transfer Protocol – HTTP/1.1”), Section 9.6 (“PUT”), you’ll see what PUT is actually for:
The PUT method requests that the enclosed entity be stored under the supplied Request-URI.
There’s also a handy paragraph to explain the difference between POST and PUT:
The fundamental difference between the POST and PUT requests is reflected in the different meaning of the Request-URI. The URI in a POST request identifies the resource that will handle the enclosed entity. That resource might be a data-accepting process, a gateway to some other protocol, or a separate entity that accepts annotations. In contrast, the URI in a PUT request identifies the entity enclosed with the request – the user agent knows what URI is intended and the server MUST NOT attempt to apply the request to some other resource.
It doesn’t mention anything about the difference between updating/creating, because that’s not what it’s about. It’s about the difference between this:
obj.set_attribute(value) # A POST request.
And this:
obj.attribute = value # A PUT request.
So please, stop the spread of this popular misconception. Read your RFCs.
Others have already posted excellent answers, I just wanted to add that with most languages, frameworks, and use cases you'll be dealing with POST much, much more often than PUT. To the point where PUT, DELETE, etc. are basically trivia questions.
A POST is considered something of a factory type method. You include data with it to create what you want and whatever is on the other end knows what to do with it. A PUT is used to update existing data at a given URL, or to create something new when you know what the URI is going to be and it doesn't already exist (as opposed to a POST which will create something and return a URL to it if necessary).
It should be pretty straightforward when to use one or the other, but complex wordings are a source of confusion for many of us.
When to use them:
Use PUT when you want to modify a singular resource that is already a part of resource collection. PUT replaces the resource in its entirety. Example: PUT /resources/:resourceId
Sidenote: Use PATCH if you want to update a part of the resource.
Use POST when you want to add a child resource under a collection of resources.
Example: POST => /resources
In general:
Generally, in practice, always use PUT for UPDATE operations.
Always use POST for CREATE operations.
Example:
GET /company/reports => Get all reports
GET /company/reports/{id} => Get the report information identified by "id"
POST /company/reports => Create a new report
PUT /company/reports/{id} => Update the report information identified by "id"
PATCH /company/reports/{id} => Update a part of the report information identified by "id"
DELETE /company/reports/{id} => Delete report by "id"
The difference between POST and PUT is that PUT is idempotent, that means, calling the same PUT request multiple times will always produce the same result(that is no side effect), while on the other hand, calling a POST request repeatedly may have (additional) side effects of creating the same resource multiple times.
GET : Requests using GET only retrieve data , that is it requests a representation of the specified resource
POST : It sends data to the server to create a resource. The type of the body of the request is indicated by the Content-Type header. It often causes a change in state or side effects on the server
PUT : Creates a new resource or replaces a representation of the target resource with the request payload
PATCH : It is used to apply partial modifications to a resource
DELETE : It deletes the specified resource
TRACE : It performs a message loop-back test along the path to the target resource, providing a useful debugging mechanism
OPTIONS : It is used to describe the communication options for the target resource, the client can specify a URL for the OPTIONS method, or an asterisk (*) to refer to the entire server.
HEAD : It asks for a response identical to that of a GET request, but without the response body
CONNECT : It establishes a tunnel to the server identified by the target resource , can be used to access websites that use SSL (HTTPS)
In simple words you can say:
1.HTTP Get:It is used to get one or more items
2.HTTP Post:It is used to create an item
3.HTTP Put:It is used to update an item
4.HTTP Patch:It is used to partially update an item
5.HTTP Delete:It is used to delete an item
It would be worth mentioning that POST is subject to some common Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks while PUT isn't.
The CSRF below are not possible with PUT when the victim visits attackersite.com.
The effect of the attack is that the victim unintentionally deletes a user just because it (the victim) was logged-in as admin on target.site.com, before visiting attackersite.com:
Malicious code on attackersite.com:
Case 1: Normal request. saved target.site.com cookies will automatically be sent by the browser: (note: supporting PUT only, at the endpoint, is safer because it is not a supported <form> attribute value)
<!--deletes user with id 5-->
<form id="myform" method="post" action="http://target.site.com/deleteUser" >
<input type="hidden" name="userId" value="5">
</form>
<script>document.createElement('form').submit.call(document.getElementById('myform'));</script>
Case 2: XHR request. saved target.site.com cookies will automatically be sent by the browser: (note: supporting PUT only, at the endpoint, is safer because an attempt to send PUT would trigger a preflight request, whose response would prevent the browser from requesting the deleteUser page)
//deletes user with id 5
var xhr = new XMLHttpRequest();
xhr.open("POST", "http://target.site.com/deleteUser");
xhr.withCredentials=true;
xhr.send(["userId=5"]);
MDN Ref : [..]Unlike “simple requests” (discussed above), --[[ Means: POST/GET/HEAD ]]--, for "preflighted" requests the browser first sends an HTTP request using the OPTIONS method[..]
cors in action : [..]Certain types of requests, such as DELETE or PUT, need to go a step further and ask for the server’s permission before making the actual request[..]what is called a preflight request[..]
REST-ful usage
POST is used to create a new resource and then returns the resource URI
EX
REQUEST : POST ..../books
{
"book":"booName",
"author":"authorName"
}
This call may create a new book and returns that book URI
Response ...THE-NEW-RESOURCE-URI/books/5
PUT is used to replace a resource, if that resource is exist then simply update it, but if that resource doesn't exist then create it,
REQUEST : PUT ..../books/5
{
"book":"booName",
"author":"authorName"
}
With PUT we know the resource identifier, but POST will return the new resource identifier
Non REST-ful usage
POST is used to initiate an action on the server side, this action may or may not create a resource, but this action will have side affects always it will change something on the server
PUT is used to place or replace literal content at a specific URL
Another difference in both REST-ful and non REST-ful styles
POST is Non-Idempotent Operation: It will cause some changes if executed multiple times with the same request.
PUT is Idempotent Operation: It will have no side-effects if executed multiple times with the same request.
Actually there's no difference other than their title. There's actually a basic difference between GET and the others. With a "GET"-Request method, you send the data in the url-address-line, which are separated first by a question-mark, and then with a & sign.
But with a "POST"-request method, you can't pass data through the url, but you have to pass the data as an object in the so called "body" of the request. On the server side, you have then to read out the body of the received content in order to get the sent data.
But there's on the other side no possibility to send content in the body, when you send a "GET"-Request.
The claim, that "GET" is only for getting data and "POST" is for posting data, is absolutely wrong. Noone can prevent you from creating new content, deleting existing content, editing existing content or do whatever in the backend, based on the data, that is sent by the "GET" request or by the "POST" request. And nobody can prevent you to code the backend in a way, that with a "POST"-Request, the client asks for some data.
With a request, no matter which method you use, you call a URL and send or don't send some data to specify, which information you want to pass to the server to deal with your request, and then the client gets an answer from the server. The data can contain whatever you want to send, the backend is allowed to do whatever it wants with the data and the response can contain any information, that you want to put in there.
There are only these two BASIC METHODS. GET and POST. But it's their structure, which makes them different and not what you code in the backend. In the backend you can code whatever you want to, with the received data. But with the "POST"-request you have to send/retrieve the data in the body and not in the url-addressline, and with a "GET" request, you have to send/retrieve data in the url-addressline and not in the body. That's all.
All the other methods, like "PUT", "DELETE" and so on, they have the same structure as "POST".
The POST Method is mainly used, if you want to hide the content somewhat, because whatever you write in the url-addressline, this will be saved in the cache and a GET-Method is the same as writing a url-addressline with data. So if you want to send sensitive data, which is not always necessarily username and password, but for example some ids or hashes, which you don't want to be shown in the url-address-line, then you should use the POST method.
Also the URL-Addressline's length is limited to 1024 symbols, whereas the "POST"-Method is not restricted. So if you have a bigger amount of data, you might not be able to send it with a GET-Request, but you'll need to use the POST-Request. So this is also another plus point for the POST-request.
But dealing with the GET-request is way easier, when you don't have complicated text to send.
Otherwise, and this is another plus point for the POST method, is, that with the GET-method you need to url-encode the text, in order to be able to send some symbols within the text or even spaces. But with a POST method you have no restrictions and your content doesn't need to be changed or manipulated in any way.
Summary
Use PUT to create or replace the state of the target resource with the state defined by the representation enclosed in the request. That standardized intended effect is idempotent so it informs intermediaries that they can repeat a request in case of communication failure.
Use POST otherwise (including to create or replace the state of a resource other than the target resource). Its intended effect is not standardized so intermediaries cannot rely on any universal property.
References
The latest authoritative description of the semantic difference between the POST and PUT request methods is given in RFC 7231 (Roy Fielding, Julian Reschke, 2014):
The fundamental difference between the POST and PUT methods is highlighted by the different intent for the enclosed representation. The target resource in a POST request is intended to handle the enclosed representation according to the resource's own semantics, whereas the enclosed representation in a PUT request is defined as replacing the state of the target resource. Hence, the intent of PUT is idempotent and visible to intermediaries, even though the exact effect is only known by the origin server.
In other words, the intended effect of PUT is standardized (create or replace the state of the target resource with the state defined by the representation enclosed in the request) and so is common to all target resources, while the intended effect of POST is not standardized and so is specific to each target resource. Thus POST can be used for anything, including for achieving the intended effects of PUT and other request methods (GET, HEAD, DELETE, CONNECT, OPTIONS, and TRACE).
But it is recommended to always use the more specialized request method rather than POST when applicable because it provides more information to intermediaries for automating information retrieval (since GET, HEAD, OPTIONS, and TRACE are defined as safe), handling communication failure (since GET, HEAD, PUT, DELETE, OPTIONS, and TRACE are defined as idempotent), and optimizing cache performance (since GET and HEAD are defined as cacheable), as explained in It Is Okay to Use POST (Roy Fielding, 2009):
POST only becomes an issue when it is used in a situation for which some other method is ideally suited: e.g., retrieval of information that should be a representation of some resource (GET), complete replacement of a representation (PUT), or any of the other standardized methods that tell intermediaries something more valuable than “this may change something.” The other methods are more valuable to intermediaries because they say something about how failures can be automatically handled and how intermediate caches can optimize their behavior. POST does not have those characteristics, but that doesn’t mean we can live without it. POST serves many useful purposes in HTTP, including the general purpose of “this action isn’t worth standardizing.”
Both PUT and POST are Rest Methods .
PUT - If we make the same request twice using PUT using same parameters both times, the second request will not have any effect. This is why PUT is generally used for the Update scenario,calling Update more than once with the same parameters doesn't do anything more than the initial call hence PUT is idempotent.
POST is not idempotent , for instance Create will create two separate entries into the target hence it is not idempotent so CREATE is used widely in POST.
Making the same call using POST with same parameters each time will cause two different things to happen, hence why POST is commonly used for the Create scenario
Post and Put are mainly used for post the data and other update the data. But you can do the same with post request only.
I have a use case where some context needs to be transferred from the UI to the backend and backend needs to decide and send the response based on that context.
This can be achieved by sending the context through request body and at the server side, by parsing the request body, the representation can be sent in the response body.
My doubt is which http method is suitable for this?
GET: If we use GET, we can send the request body but it is advised that the body should not have any semantics related to the request.
See this: http-get-with-request-body
So I am left with POST or PUT but these corresponds to updating or creating a resource and using them might be little misleading.
So my question is what is the appropriate HTTP method that could be used in this scenario which is acceptable in the RESTful design standpoint.
Appreciate the response.
I am thinking to use POST or PUT as there are no restrictions on consuming the request body on the server side.
EDIT:
I think POST would serve my purpose.
The rfc HTTP RFC 7231 says that POST can be used for:
Providing a block of data, such as the fields entered into an HTML form, to a data-handling process
So the data handling process for me is the backend server and HTML Form is equivalent to any UI element.
So I can make use POST method to send the data to backend and send the existing resource representation as response body with http-status code being 200
Please bear in mind that GET must be used for data retrieval only, without side effects. That is, GET is both safe and idempotent (see more details here).
If the operation is meant to be idempotent, go for PUT:
4.3.4. PUT
The PUT method requests that the state of the target resource be created or replaced with the state defined by the representation enclosed in the request message payload. A successful PUT of a given representation would suggest that a subsequent GET on that same target resource will result in an equivalent representation being sent in a 200 (OK) response. [...]
Otherwise, go for POST, which is a catch all verb:
4.3.3. POST
The POST method requests that the target resource process the representation enclosed in the request according to the resource's own specific semantics. [...]
I would go for POST because in REST, PUT is used to create a new resource like user.
There is a PATCH post method, that is for changing things maybe thats what you are looking for
So my question is what is the appropriate HTTP method that could be used in this scenario which is acceptable in the RESTful design standpoint.
The world wide web is about as RESTful an example as you are going to find, and HTML forms only support GET (which should not have a request body) and POST. So POST must be fine (and it is).
More generally, POST can be used for anything; the other methods should be used when they are a better semantic fit. For example, you can use POST to make a resource unavailable, but DELETE is more explicit, and generic components can do sensible things because they recognize the semantics. PUT is a better choice than POST when what you are intending is to provide the server with a new representation of a resource, and so on.
I am not able to understand why the payload of the HTTP GET is forbidden
Payload of the HTTP GET is forbidden because the standard says "don't do that".
I believe it is written that way to simplify the rules for caching the response. As written, cache implementations only have to worry about header data (including information on the start-line).
But it could be as simple as the fact that the older versions of the standard didn't require that generic components do anything specific with the message-body of a GET request, and therefore modern specifications say "don't do that" in order to maintain backward compatibility. (One of the important constraints in designing long-lived systems is that you don't break older implementations.)
I've seen several GWT code excerpts where the developer extended DefaultRequestTransport and gave it custom functionality. One such example is in this SO question regarding authentication/login filters. But I have seen several others besides this one example.
My question: when & why does someone need to extend this class and override its methods? (In other words, what does this class do, what services do its methods perform, and why would I need to customize them?)
In that one example, the createRequestCallback method was overridden. According to the Javadocs on that method, it's purpose is to:
Create a RequestCallback that maps the HTTP response onto the TransportReceiver interface.
This is still sort of a cryptic explanation to me. Could someone please give me a layman's explanation for what scenarios it would be beneficial to extend this class and override 1+ of its methods?
RequestFactory does not depend on a specific "transport" mechanism; it deals with JSON representations of requests and responses but the way they're exchanged and transferred is out of scope, and deferred to a RequestTransport.
The DefaultRequestTransport uses a RequestBuilder to a given (but configurable) URL; because it uses RequestBuilder, it can only be used in a GWT client (to be compiled to JavaScript). There's also the UrlRequestTransport which uses a java.net.HttpURLConnection and can be used on any client running in a JVM (a server making a call to another server, an Android application, a desktop Java application, etc.)
In theory (because I never tried it and never heard someone else tried it), you could make a RequestTransport that uses Comet or WebSockets, or whichever transport you'd like. Of course, the server side would have to be adapted too (SimpleRequestProcessor can easily reused outside the RequestFactoryServlet; this is a similar separation of concerns)
Back to DefaultRequestTransport: it uses RequestBuilder and provides a few hooks that you can override to customize how it works. The most common use-case is to intercept all requests to add some request header (e.g. credentials) and/or all responses to handle specific HTTP responses before decoding the JSON-encoded RequestFactory response (e.g. intercept "unauthorized" response to ask the user to sign in).
DefaultRequestTransport works as an adapter between the RequestFactory API and the RequestBuilder one, and createRequestCallback is one half of it responsible for adapting the response.
In the example shown they need to extend DefaultRequestTransport in order to inspect all RF server responses and catch 401 status (SC_UNAUTHORIZED) which means that the request was rejected in the server side because the user has not a valid session, and then redirect the user to the application login page.
I've used DefaultRequestTransport as well for changing the requestUrl (the default is set to gwtRequest), so as I can set filters based on the url pattern: for instance authenticated RF services go to /myapp/gwtRequest or non-authenticated RF services go to /myapp/anonymousRequest etc.
I also have a customized RequestTransport using modified versions of RequestBuilder and XMLHttpRequest able to monitor onprogress events, very helpful for large requests.
You could extend it to send customized headers used for doing CORS authentication or whatever.
In summary RequestTransport is the way to modify the client transport layer of RF.
I would like to send a request to a Java Servlet from PHP and receive the response from the same and show it on the PHP page. How should this be done?
Thanks and Regards
Abishek R Srikaanth
If all you want is to print the response of a GET request to an external resource plain vanilla into the PHP response, then you can use file_get_contents() for that.
<?php echo file_get_contents("http://example.com/someservlet"); ?>
The servlet's doGet() method will be invoked and whatever response it returns (which can even be a forwarded JSP) will be printed as string to the PHP response.
If you want a little more fine grained control, e.g. using POST or something, then head to curl() instead. The linked PHP manual contains several examples.
Regardless of the way, please note that whenever it returns HTML, that you should ensure that you end up with valid HTML. For example, nesting <html> tags is illegal. Pass the PHP page through the w3 validator if you're unsure. Otherwise you'd better have to parse the HTML to extract the <body> pieces of interest or to use an <iframe> instead.
<iframe src="http://example.com/someservlet"></iframe>
If I'm understanding you correctly you want to read the response of a servlet in php and then output it from php?
You can use file_get_contents to the url (Probaly not the best way, but for simplicities sake it the easiest) and then just echo the output.
For example:
$content = file_get_content('http://www.google.com');
echo $content;
But if you want to be able to login or use the session at the servlet side you will need think of something else. As each request to the server from php will be a new one, it does not store cookies etc.. like browsers do.
Hope that helps
This is a situation which might do well to be rethought, but, if there are no other options...
If there is a way to actually update the portlet, then I would recommend creating some form of service call -- SOAP, custom RPC, etc -- on the Java side. Technically this is the most correct way to do things.
Failing that, if this is a simple GET request, then use file_get_contents.
If it has to be a POST/PUT/DELETE, then you can use cURL. cURL also has the benefit of being able to handle simulated sessions, which means that you are then able to simulate a log in and actions following that (though not without some difficulty).
If you don't have cURL and you need to POST/PUT/DELETE, then the streams library might be able to give you what you need.
If you don't have the streams library or cURL and you need to POST/PUT/DELETE, then there are other means of accomplishing that, but maybe you should really re-rethink that situation.
If all of the above don't work, then you will need to tame the Spectral Wolf. The Spectral Wolf fears only fire. I can no longer help you, but if you master the Spectral Wolf, he will guide you. Godspeed.
If you really want to do that, you can create a Java app that takes parameters to populate request and response objects, instantiates a servlet, runs the correct method, gets the result and displays it, then call this Java app from PHP.
Or you can use the experimental and unrecommended PHP / Java Integration module.