I am using Jackson to convert JSON into an object and vice versa. However, when writing back the object back as JSON it is duplicated, like so:
{
"Users": [
{
"name": "Steve",
"buckets": [
{
"bucketName": "stevesbucket",
"permissions": [
"CREATE",
"READ",
"UPDATE",
"DELETE"
],
"owner": "Steve"
},
{
"bucketName": "NEW BUCKET 2",
"permissions": [
"CREATE",
"READ",
"UPDATE",
"DELETE"
],
"owner": "Steve"
}
]
},
{
"name": "Jeff",
"buckets": [
{
"bucketName": "jeffsbucket",
"permissions": [
"CREATE",
"READ",
"UPDATE",
"DELETE"
],
"owner": "Jeff"
},
{
"bucketName": "stevesbucket",
"permissions": [
"READ"
],
"owner": "Steve"
}
]
}
],
"users": [
{
"name": "Steve",
"buckets": [
{
"bucketName": "stevesbucket",
"permissions": [
"CREATE",
"READ",
"UPDATE",
"DELETE"
],
"owner": "Steve"
},
{
"bucketName": "NEW BUCKET 2",
"permissions": [
"CREATE",
"READ",
"UPDATE",
"DELETE"
],
"owner": "Steve"
}
]
},
{
"name": "Jeff",
"buckets": [
{
"bucketName": "jeffsbucket",
"permissions": [
"CREATE",
"READ",
"UPDATE",
"DELETE"
],
"owner": "Jeff"
},
{
"bucketName": "stevesbucket",
"permissions": [
"READ"
],
"owner": "Steve"
}
]
}
]
}
Where there should only be one "Users" field. I have tried playing with the visibility settings of my object mapper with this:
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
mapper.getSerializationConfig().getDefaultVisibilityChecker()
.withFieldVisibility(JsonAutoDetect.Visibility.ANY)
.withGetterVisibility(JsonAutoDetect.Visibility.NONE)
.withSetterVisibility(JsonAutoDetect.Visibility.NONE)
.withCreatorVisibility(JsonAutoDetect.Visibility.NONE);
However this hasn't made a difference. I think something in my users.java file may be causing an issue, as I have extra methods such as addBucket:
public static class Bucket
{
private String bucketName;
private String[] permissions;
private String owner;
public void setBucket(String bucketName, String[] permissions, String owner)
{
this.bucketName = bucketName;
this.permissions = permissions;
this.owner = owner;
}
public String getBucketName()
{
return bucketName;
}
public String[] getPermissions()
{
return permissions;
}
public String getOwner()
{
return owner;
}
}
public static class User
{
private String name;
private Bucket[] buckets;
public String getName()
{
return name;
}
public Bucket[] getBuckets()
{
return buckets;
}
#JsonIgnore
public void addBucket(String bucketName, String[] permissions, String owner)
{
Bucket[] temp = new Bucket[buckets.length+1];
for(int i = 0; i < buckets.length; ++i)
{
temp[i] = buckets[i];
}
temp[temp.length-1] = new Bucket();
temp[temp.length-1].setBucket(bucketName, permissions, owner);
buckets = temp;
}
}
public User[] Users;
public User[] getUsers()
{
return Users;
}
public void setUsers(User[] newUsers)
{
Users = newUsers;
}
Are there some properties I need to add to some things in users.java? Or are there other visibility settings I should be using with my ObjectMapper?
public User[] Users;
public User[] getUsers()
{
return Users;
}
Jackson is serializing the public member Users as "Users" and the getUsers function as "users". Users being private should fix this, and it is good practice for it to be so
Related
I am using json-view to create a dynamic json as per my need ,it is a great library ,I am using this library for a while now .
Recently I am facing a problem with my one of the Use cases, let me place my code first
User class
public class User {
private String name;
private String emailId;
private String mobileNo;
public String getName() {
return name;
}
public void setName(String name) {
this.name = name;
}
public String getEmailId() {
return emailId;
}
public void setEmailId(String emailId) {
this.emailId = emailId;
}
public String getMobileNo() {
return mobileNo;
}
public void setMobileNo(String mobileNo) {
this.mobileNo = mobileNo;
}
}
ScreenInfoPojo class
public class ScreenInfoPojo {
private Long id;
private String name;
private ScreenInfoPojo parentScreen;
private User createdBy;
private User lastUpdatedBy;
public Long getId() {
return id;
}
public void setId(Long id) {
this.id = id;
}
public String getName() {
return name;
}
public void setName(String name) {
this.name = name;
}
public ScreenInfoPojo getParentScreen() {
return parentScreen;
}
public void setParentScreen(ScreenInfoPojo parentScreen) {
this.parentScreen = parentScreen;
}
public User getCreatedBy() {
return createdBy;
}
public void setCreatedBy(User createdBy) {
this.createdBy = createdBy;
}
public User getLastUpdatedBy() {
return lastUpdatedBy;
}
public void setLastUpdatedBy(User lastUpdatedBy) {
this.lastUpdatedBy = lastUpdatedBy;
}
Run code
public class TestMain {
public static void main(String[] args) throws JsonProcessingException {
User user=new User();
user.setName("ABC");
user.setEmailId("dev#abc123.com");
user.setMobileNo("123456789");
ScreenInfoPojo screen1=new ScreenInfoPojo();
screen1.setId(1l);
screen1.setName("Screen1");
screen1.setCreatedBy(user);
screen1.setLastUpdatedBy(user);
ScreenInfoPojo screen2=new ScreenInfoPojo();
screen2.setId(2l);
screen2.setName("Screen2");
screen2.setParentScreen(Screen1);
screen2.setCreatedBy(user);
screen2.setLastUpdatedBy(user);
ScreenInfoPojo screen3=new ScreenInfoPojo();
screen3.setId(3l);
screen3.setName("Screen3");
screen3.setParentScreen(Screen2);
screen3.setCreatedBy(user);
screen3.setLastUpdatedBy(user);
ScreenInfoPojo screen4=new ScreenInfoPojo();
screen4.setId(4l);
screen4.setName("Screen4");
screen4.setParentScreen(Screen3);
screen4.setCreatedBy(user);
screen4.setLastUpdatedBy(user);
List<ScreenInfoPojo> screens=new ArrayList<>();
screens.add(screen1);
screens.add(screen2);
screens.add(screen3);
screens.add(screen4);
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper().registerModule(new JsonViewModule());
String json = mapper.writeValueAsString(JsonView.with(screens).onClass(ScreenInfoPojo.class, Match.match()
.exclude("*")
.include("id","name","createdBy.name","lastUpdatedBy.mobileNo","parentScreen.id")));
System.out.println("json"+json);
}
Result
[{
"id": 1,
"name": "Screen1",
"parentScreen": null,
"createdBy": {
"name": "ABC"
},
"lastUpdatedBy": {
"mobileNo": "123456789"
}
}, {
"id": 2,
"name": "Screen2",
"parentScreen": {
"id": 1,
"name": "Screen1",
"parentScreen": null,
"createdBy": {},
"lastUpdatedBy": {}
},
"createdBy": {
"name": "ABC"
},
"lastUpdatedBy": {
"mobileNo": "123456789"
}
}, {
"id": 3,
"name": "Screen3",
"parentScreen": {
"id": 2,
"name": "Screen2",
"parentScreen": {
"id": 1,
"name": "Screen1",
"parentScreen": null,
"createdBy": {},
"lastUpdatedBy": {}
},
"createdBy": {},
"lastUpdatedBy": {}
},
"createdBy": {
"name": "ABC"
},
"lastUpdatedBy": {
"mobileNo": "123456789"
}
}, {
"id": 4,
"name": "Screen4",
"parentScreen": {
"id": 3,
"name": "Screen3",
"parentScreen": {
"id": 2,
"name": "Screen2",
"parentScreen": {
"id": 1,
"name": "Screen1",
"parentScreen": null,
"createdBy": {},
"lastUpdatedBy": {}
},
"createdBy": {},
"lastUpdatedBy": {}
},
"createdBy": {},
"lastUpdatedBy": {}
},
"createdBy": {
"name": "ABC"
},
"lastUpdatedBy": {
"mobileNo": "123456789"
}
}]
Expected Result
[{
"id": 1,
"name": "Screen1",
"parentScreen": null,
"createdBy": {
"name": "ABC"
},
"lastUpdatedBy": {
"mobileNo": "123456789"
}
}, {
"id": 2,
"name": "Screen2",
"parentScreen": {
"id": 1
},
"createdBy": {
"name": "ABC"
},
"lastUpdatedBy": {
"mobileNo": "123456789"
}
}, {
"id": 3,
"name": "Screen3",
"parentScreen": {
"id": 2
},
"createdBy": {
"name": "ABC"
},
"lastUpdatedBy": {
"mobileNo": "123456789"
}
}, {
"id": 4,
"name": "Screen4",
"parentScreen": {
"id": 3
},
"createdBy": {
"name": "ABC"
},
"lastUpdatedBy": {
"mobileNo": "123456789"
}
}]
Problem
In my use case I have a class ScreenInfoPojo which refers to same class as parentScreen ,
I am trying to fetch specific field/fields of parent ( "parentScreen.id") instate I am getting all fields that I have defined on child/target Object ("id","name","createdBy.name","lastUpdatedBy.mobileNo","parentScreen.id") and parent response is again recursive ! One thing i observed that It is only happening in case of a class has its own reference , I placed User class reference as two different field createdBy and lastUpdatedBy and tried to fetch "name" and "mobileNo" respectively worked just fine.
Any suggestion to solve this problem will be really helpful !!!!
Thanks
Yes. Include clause does not work for reference to the same class.
That you can do?
Compile from source according to github instruction build from source
Update function JsonViewSerializer.JsonWriter.fieldAllowed
find:
if(match == null) {
match = this.currentMatch;
} else {
prefix = "";
}
and comment else clause
if(match == null) {
match = this.currentMatch;
} else {
//prefix = "";
}
You will get expected result. But. I do not know how it will affect another filters.
To have more control you could add property to JsonView class.
For example:
in JsonView add:
private boolean ignorePathIfClassRegistered = true;
public boolean isIgnorePathIfClassRegistered() {
return ignorePathIfClassRegistered;
}
public JsonView1<T> setIgnorePathIfClassRegistered(boolean ignorePathIfClassRegistered) {
this.ignorePathIfClassRegistered = ignorePathIfClassRegistered;
return this;
}
In JsonViewSerializer.JsonWriter.fieldAllowed function rewrite if clause to:
if(match == null) {
match = this.currentMatch;
} else {
if (result.isIgnorePathIfClassRegistered())
prefix = "";
}
And you could use it in your example like:
JsonView<List<ScreenInfoPojo>> viwevedObject = JsonView
.with(screens)
.onClass(ScreenInfoPojo.class,
Match.match()
.exclude("*")
.include("id","name")
.include("createdBy.name")
.include("lastUpdatedBy.mobileNo")
.include("parentScreen.id"))
.setIgnorePathIfClassRegistered(false);
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper().registerModule(new JsonViewModule());
mapper.configure(SerializationFeature.INDENT_OUTPUT, true);
String json = mapper.writeValueAsString(viwevedObject);
You can simply use jackson annotation #jsonignore on the field that you do not want in the json response.
I don't know whether you can or not use any annotations on your code . If so this is useless..
The most flexible way to serialize an object is to write a custom serializer.
If I understood your requirements correctly, the following serializer might work:
public class CustomScreenInfoSerializer extends JsonSerializer<ScreenInfoPojo> {
#Override
public void serialize(ScreenInfoPojo value, JsonGenerator gen, SerializerProvider serializers)
throws IOException, JsonProcessingException {
gen.writeStartObject();
gen.writeNumberField("id", value.getId());
gen.writeStringField("name", value.getName());
gen.writeFieldName("createdBy");
gen.writeStartObject();
gen.writeStringField("name", value.getCreatedBy().getName());
gen.writeEndObject();
gen.writeFieldName("lastUpdatedBy");
gen.writeStartObject();
gen.writeStringField("mobileNo", value.getLastUpdatedBy().getMobileNo());
gen.writeEndObject();
if (value.getParentScreen() == null) {
gen.writeNullField("parentScreen");
}
else {
gen.writeFieldName("parentScreen");
gen.writeStartObject();
gen.writeNumberField("id", value.getParentScreen().getId());
gen.writeEndObject();
}
gen.writeEndObject();
}
}
Using
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
SimpleModule module = new SimpleModule();
module.addSerializer(ScreenInfoPojo.class, new CustomScreenInfoSerializer());
mapper.registerModule(module);
String json = mapper.writeValueAsString(screens);
System.out.println(json);
produces
[
{
"id": 1,
"name": "Screen1",
"createdBy": {
"name": "ABC"
},
"lastUpdatedBy": {
"mobileNo": "123456789"
},
"parentScreen": null
},
{
"id": 2,
"name": "Screen2",
"createdBy": {
"name": "ABC"
},
"lastUpdatedBy": {
"mobileNo": "123456789"
},
"parentScreen": {
"id": 1
}
},
{
"id": 3,
"name": "Screen3",
"createdBy": {
"name": "ABC"
},
"lastUpdatedBy": {
"mobileNo": "123456789"
},
"parentScreen": {
"id": 2
}
},
{
"id": 4,
"name": "Screen4",
"createdBy": {
"name": "ABC"
},
"lastUpdatedBy": {
"mobileNo": "123456789"
},
"parentScreen": {
"id": 3
}
}
]
I am trying to make the Json output from Cucumber into a single Java object. This contains objects nested four levels deep, and I am having trouble deserializing it. I am presently using Jackson, but open to suggestions.
Here is my Json code:
{
"line": 1,
"elements": [
{
"line": 3,
"name": "Converteren centimeters naar voeten/inches",
"description": "",
"id": "applicatie-neemt-maten-in-cm-en-converteert-ze-naar-voet/inch,-en-vice-versa;converteren-centimeters-naar-voeten/inches",
"type": "scenario",
"keyword": "Scenario",
"steps": [
{
"result": {
"duration": 476796588,
"status": "passed"
},
"line": 4,
"name": "maak Maten-object aan met invoer in \"centimeters\"",
"match": {
"arguments": [
{
"val": "centimeters",
"offset": 37
}
],
"location": "StepDefinition.maakMatenObjectAanMetInvoerIn(String)"
},
"keyword": "Given "
},
{
"result": {
"duration": 36319,
"status": "passed"
},
"line": 5,
"name": "ik converteer",
"match": {
"location": "StepDefinition.converteerMaten()"
},
"keyword": "When "
},
{
"result": {
"duration": 49138,
"status": "passed"
},
"line": 6,
"name": "uitvoer bevat maat in \"voeten/inches\"",
"match": {
"arguments": [
{
"val": "voeten/inches",
"offset": 23
}
],
"location": "StepDefinition.uitvoerBevatMaatIn(String)"
},
"keyword": "Then "
}
]
},
{
"line": 8,
"name": "Converteren voeten/inches naar centimeters",
"description": "",
"id": "applicatie-neemt-maten-in-cm-en-converteert-ze-naar-voet/inch,-en-vice-versa;converteren-voeten/inches-naar-centimeters",
"type": "scenario",
"keyword": "Scenario",
"steps": [
{
"result": {
"duration": 84175,
"status": "passed"
},
"line": 9,
"name": "maak Maten-object aan met invoer in \"voeten/inches\"",
"match": {
"arguments": [
{
"val": "voeten/inches",
"offset": 37
}
],
"location": "StepDefinition.maakMatenObjectAanMetInvoerIn(String)"
},
"keyword": "Given "
},
{
"result": {
"duration": 23928,
"status": "passed"
},
"line": 10,
"name": "ik converteer",
"match": {
"location": "StepDefinition.converteerMaten()"
},
"keyword": "When "
},
{
"result": {
"duration": 55547,
"status": "passed"
},
"line": 11,
"name": "uitvoer bevat maat in \"centimeters\"",
"match": {
"arguments": [
{
"val": "centimeters",
"offset": 23
}
],
"location": "StepDefinition.uitvoerBevatMaatIn(String)"
},
"keyword": "Then "
}
]
}
],
"name": "Applicatie neemt maten in cm en converteert ze naar voet/inch, en vice versa",
"description": "",
"id": "applicatie-neemt-maten-in-cm-en-converteert-ze-naar-voet/inch,-en-vice-versa",
"keyword": "Feature",
"uri": "sample.feature"
}
I have tried a number of different approaches. First I used nested inner classes, but it appeared you had to make them static, which I feared would not work since I have multiple instances of the same object within one (multiple "element"-objects in the root, for example). Then I tried putting them in separate classes, with Json annotations. Here's where that got me (omitting setters):
public class CucumberUitvoer {
private String name;
private String description;
private String id;
private String keyword;
private String uri;
private int line;
#JsonProperty("elements")
private List<FeatureObject> elements;
public CucumberUitvoer(){}
}
public class FeatureObject {
private String name;
private String description;
private String id;
private String type;
private String keyword;
private int line;
#JsonProperty("steps")
private List<StepObject> steps;
public FeatureObject() {
}
}
public class StepObject {
#JsonProperty("result")
private ResultObject result;
private String name;
private String given;
private String location;
private String keyword;
private int line;
#JsonProperty("match")
private MatchObject match;
public StepObject(){}
}
public class ResultObject {
private int duration;
private String status;
public ResultObject(){}
}
public class MatchObject {
#JsonProperty("arguments")
private List<ArgumentObject> arguments;
private String location;
public MatchObject(){}
}
public class ArgumentObject {
private String val;
private String offset;
public ArgumentObject(){}
}
For clarification, here's a class diagram of how the nesting works.
This solution gives me the following error:
com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.JsonMappingException: Can not deserialize instance of nl.icaprojecten.TestIntegratieQuintor.JSONInterpreter.CucumberUitvoer out of START_ARRAY token
Here is the code doing the actual mapping:
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
mapper.configure(DeserializationFeature.FAIL_ON_UNKNOWN_PROPERTIES, false);
CucumberUitvoer obj1 = null;
try {
obj1 = mapper.readValue(json, CucumberUitvoer.class);
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
Is there a quick fix to this approach to make it work, or should I try something entirely different?
Ok I spent some time debugging and trying to figure out what was the problem, and finally was something pretty obvious.
implements Serializable
Thats the line I added to MatchObject and worked.
When we try to deserialize some object first we have to make those classes implements the interface Serializable
I just tried your sample code and oddly, it works.
Can you please double check your imports, if the JSON is coming in as provided and the getters, setters, constructors are actually there?
You can get the idea from this code to deserialize,
public class testCustomDeSerializer extends JsonDeserializer<test> {
public testCustomDeSerializer() {
this(null);
}
public TestCustomDeSerializer(Class t) {
// super(t);
}
#Override
public Test deserialize(JsonParser p, DeserializationContext ctx) throws IOException, JsonProcessingException {
ObjectCodec objectCodec = p.getCodec();
JsonNode node = objectCodec.readTree(p);
ObjectMapper objectMapper = new ObjectMapper();
Test test= new Test();
test.setId(node.get("line").asText());
List<elements> elementList = new ArrayList<>();
JsonNode elementsNode = node.get("elements");
Iterator<JsonNode> slaidsIterator = elementsNode.elements();
while (slaidsIterator.hasNext()) {
Steps steps= new Steps();
JsonNode slaidNode = slaidsIterator.next();
JsonNode stepNode= (JsonNode) slaidNode.get("Steps");
BoundingPoly in = objectMapper.readValue(stepNode.toString(), Steps.class);
elementsNode.setSteps(in);
/// continue
return
}
Hope it helps
I am trying to map this JSONArray using Spring RestTemplate:
[{
"Command": "/usr/sbin/sshd -D",
"Created": 1454501297,
"Id": "e00ca61f134090da461a3f39d47fc0cbeda77fbbc0610439d3c16a932686b612",
"Image": "ubuntu:latest",
"Labels": {
},
"Names": [
"/nova-c1896fbd-1309-4da2-8d77-b4fe4c02fa8e"
],
"Ports": [
],
"Status": "Up 2 hours"
}, {
"Command": "/usr/sbin/sshd -D",
"Created": 1450106126,
"Id": "7ffc9dbdd200e2c23adec442abd656ed57306955332697cb7da979f36ebf3b22",
"Image": "ubuntu:latest",
"Labels": {
},
"Names": [
"/nova-93b9ae40-8135-48b7-ac17-12094603b28c"
],
"Ports": [
],
"Status": "Up 2 hours"
}]
Here is ContainersInfo class:
#JsonIgnoreProperties(ignoreUnknown = true)
public class ContainersInfo {
private String Id;
private List<String> Names;
public String getId() {
return Id;
}
public void setId(String id) {
Id = id;
}
public List<String> getNames() {
return Names;
}
public void setNames(List<String> names) {
Names = names;
}
}
However I get null when I want to get the data:
ContainersInfo[] containers = syncRestTemplate.getForObject("http://192.168.1.2:4243/containers/json?all=1", ContainersInfo[].class);
for (int i = 0; i < containers.length; i++)
System.out.println("id:" + containers[i].getId());
The resulting output is as follows:
id:null
id:null
Any idea, what I should do?
Your JSON field names are in pascal case as opposed to camel case (which is usually the case). Set Jackson naming strategy to PascalCaseStrategy, i.e by adding #JsonNaming(PascalCaseStrategy.class) annotation into ContainersInfo class.
I guess this might have been asked earlier, but could not find exactly what I was looking for. So here it goes.
My JSON looks like this -
{
"verticals": [
{
"name": "vertical1",
"icon": "icon1",
"children": []
},
{
"name": "vertical2",
"icon": "icon2",
"children": []
}
],
"config": {
"vertical1": [
{
"title": "Section1",
"icon": "icon1",
"prefs": [
{
"type": "type1",
"opts": [
{
"name": "pref_store_key",
"value": "filter-prefix-food"
}
],
"icons": [
"icon3",
"icon4"
]
},
{
"type": "type2",
"opts": [
{
"name": "pref_store_key",
"value": "filter-prefix-cue"
}
],
"icons": [
"icon5",
"icon6"
]
}
]
}
],
"vertical2": [
{
"title": "Section1",
"icon": "icon1",
"prefs": [
{
"type": "type1",
"opts": [
{
"name": "pref_store_key",
"value": "filter-prefix-food"
}
],
"icons": [
"icon3",
"icon4"
]
},
{
"type": "type2",
"opts": [
{
"name": "pref_store_key",
"value": "filter-prefix-cue"
}
],
"icons": [
"icon5",
"icon6"
]
}
]
}
]
}
}
My classes are -
public class FeatureConfigData {
private Map<String, List<ItemConfig>> config = null;
private List<Vertical> verticals = null;
public List<ItemConfig> getItemConfig(String vertical) {
if (config == null) {
return null;
} else {
return config.get(vertical);
}
}
public List<Vertical> getVerticals() {
return verticals;
}
public Map<String, List<ItemConfig>> getConfig() {
return config;
}
public void setConfig(Map<String, List<ItemConfig>> config) {
this.config = config;
}
}
public class ItemConfig {
private String title = null;
private String icon = null;
private List<Pref> prefs = null;
public static class Pref {
private String type = null;
private List<String> icons = null;
private List<Opt> opts = null;
public String getType() { return type; }
public List<String> getIcons() { return icons; }
public List<Opt> getOpts() { return opts; }
}
public static class Opt {
private String name;
private String value;
public String getName() { return name; }
public String getValue() { return value; }
}
public String getTitle() { return title; }
public String getIcon() { return icon; }
public List<Pref> getPrefs() { return prefs; }
}
I am de-serializing the json string with this -
objectMapper.configure(DeserializationFeature.FAIL_ON_UNKNOWN_PROPERTIES, false)
.enableDefaultTyping(ObjectMapper.DefaultTyping.NON_FINAL);
FeatureConfigData config = objectMapper.readValue(json, FeatureConfigData.class);
Why is the config field coming out to be null in my case and not getting populated? Do I need to do something else to ensure that Jackson understands that map keys are "vertical1", "vertical2" etc?
Note, this configuration drives the actual name/number of the verticals. So it's not an option to replace map> with a class with fields vertical1, vertical2 etc.
I wanted to form JSON like this:
{
"Schedule": [
{
"id": "A",
"name": "Summary",
"ischild": "1",
"level1": [
{
"id": "A.1",
"name": "A.1",
"ischild": "1",
"level2": [
{
"id": "A.1.a",
"name": "Income Statement",
"ischild": "0"
},
{
"id": "A.1.b",
"name": "Balance Sheet",
"ischild": "0"
},
{
"id": "A.1.c",
"name": "A.1.c",
"ischild": "1",
"level3": [
{
"id": "A.1.c.1",
"name": "General RWA",
"ischild": "0"
},
{
"id": "A.1.c.2",
"name": "Standardized RWA",
"ischild": "0"
},
{
"id": "A.1.c.3",
"name": "Advanced RWA",
"ischild": "0"
}
]
}
]
}
]
}
]
}
But my code is giving below output:
{
"Schedule": [
{
"name": "Summary",
"ischild": "1",
"id": "A",
"N_LEVEL": "1"
},
{
"name": "A.1",
"ischild": "1",
"id": "A.1",
"N_LEVEL": "2"
},
{
"name": "Income Statement",
"ischild": "0",
"id": "A.1.a",
"N_LEVEL": "3"
},
{
"name": "Balance Sheet",
"ischild": "0",
"id": "A.1.b",
"N_LEVEL": "3"
},
{
"name": "A.1.c",
"ischild": "1",
"id": "A.1.c",
"N_LEVEL": "3"
},
{
"name": "General RWA",
"ischild": "0",
"id": "A.1.c.1",
"N_LEVEL": "4"
},
{
"name": "Standardized RWA",
"ischild": "0",
"id": "A.1.c.2",
"N_LEVEL": "4"
},
{
"name": "Advanced RWA",
"ischild": "0",
"id": "A.1.c.3",
"N_LEVEL": "4"
}
]
}
Here is my code:
public static String getJSONFromResultSet(ResultSet rs,String keyName)
{
System.out.println(" in getJSONFromResultSet method");
Map json = new HashMap();
List list = new ArrayList();
if(rs!=null)
{
try
{
ResultSetMetaData metaData = rs.getMetaData();
while(rs.next())
{
Map<String,Object> columnMap = new HashMap<String, Object>();
for(int columnIndex=1;columnIndex<=metaData.getColumnCount();columnIndex++)
{
if(rs.getString(metaData.getColumnName(columnIndex))!=null)
columnMap.put(metaData.getColumnLabel(columnIndex),rs.getString(metaData.getColumnName(columnIndex)));
else
columnMap.put(metaData.getColumnLabel(columnIndex), "");
}
list.add(columnMap);
}
}
catch (SQLException e)
{
e.printStackTrace();
}
json.put(keyName, list);
}
return JSONValue.toJSONString(json);
I think your target structure could be better if it's names didn't change on every level. The level number is a value not a key. ischild makes no sense either, I think this is isNotALeaf, well that can be worked out, so leave that off too, so we have:
{
"id": "A",
"name": "Summary",
"level": "1",
"children": [
{
"id": "A.1",
"name": "A.1",
"level": "2",
"children": [
{
"id": "A.1.a",
"name": "Income Statement",
"level": "3"
},
{
"id": "A.1.b",
"name": "Balance Sheet",
"level": "3"
}
]
}
}
Then generate a self-referencing class with based on that for use in GSon:
package com.example;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
import javax.annotation.Generated;
import com.google.gson.annotations.Expose;
#Generated("org.jsonschema2pojo")
public class Child {
#Expose
private String id;
#Expose
private String name;
#Expose
private String level;
#Expose
private List<Child> children = new ArrayList<Child>();
public String getId() {
return id;
}
public void setId(String id) {
this.id = id;
}
public String getName() {
return name;
}
public void setName(String name) {
this.name = name;
}
public String getLevel() {
return level;
}
public void setLevel(String level) {
this.level = level;
}
public List<Child_> getChildren() {
return children;
}
public void setChildren(List<Child> children) {
this.children = children;
}
}