When I try to send data on the lingering connection, it nevers arrives on the server nor is any error detected on the print writer. This applies to the heartbeat system too.
I have a semi-heartbeat system running. The point of it was to check the "out" error if it happens, but it never does. I have setKeepAlive on for both the app and the server, I am checking out.checkError(), nothing is detecting a lingering connection.
With or without keep alive the same thing happens.
Socket Creation (takes place in a thread):
Socket socket = new Socket(serverAddr, port);
socket.setKeepAlive(true);
Heart Beat System (also threaded):
public void heartbeat(){
new Thread(new Runnable() {
public void run() {
while(connected == true){
try{
Thread.sleep(120000);
}catch (Exception e){
}
handlerObject.sendMessage(String.valueOf((char) 1));
}
}
}).start();
}
Send Message is defined as:
public void sendMessage(String data){
try {
PrintWriter out = new PrintWriter(socket.getOutputStream());//, true);
out.println(data + "\r\n");
out.flush();
if(out.checkError()) {
socket.close();
}
}catch (Exception e){
try{
socket.close();
} catch (Exception z){
}
}
}
I might be firewall blocking the traffic on sever ,please check by turning off firewall on sever or adding appropriate rule (since you are facing no error so it might be that firewall blocking traffic)
The solution here was to use socket.setSoTimeout(milliseconds); and have the server send a heart beat a few seconds before that. If the client doesn't recieve a heartbeat before then it it will timeout. I can now catch that exception and reconnect.
Related
I have written a client to run on an android device (android 6) and when the server is up and running it connects, however when the server is down the socket() call should throw an exception however it doesn't.
I originally tried it using the NDK and ran into a very similar issue (Android NDK socket connect() returning 0 when it should fail whilst on 3g).
I am assuming this is a bug with android at this point but any insight into a solution or work around would be much appreciated.
The code in question:
public class Client implements Runnable{
private Socket socket;
private InetAddress IP;
private int port;
public Client(int port){
try {
this.IP = InetAddress.getByName(server ip);
}
catch(UnknownHostException e){
Log.d("App1", "Unknown Host, connection failed");
System.exit(1);
}
this.port = port;
Log.d("App1", "initialised");
}
#Override
public void run(){
try {
this.socket = new Socket(this.IP, this.port);
Log.d("FiX1", "Connected");
listen();
}
catch(IOException e){
Log.d("FiX1,","connection failed");
System.exit(1);
}
finally
{
try{
socket.close(); // dispose
}
catch(IOException e){
System.exit(1);
}
}
}
public void listen() {
try {
BufferedReader in = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(socket.getInputStream()));
while (true) {
String cominginText = "";
try {
cominginText = in.readLine();
Log.d("FiX1",cominginText);
} catch (IOException e) {
//error ("System: " + "Connection to server lost!");
System.exit(1);
break;
}
}
} catch (IOException e) {
System.exit(1);
}
}
}
The best solution I could find was to manually send an acknowledgement from the server that a connection had been made, the client would retry the connection if it did not receive this message within a certain time after it claimed to have connected.
There is a difference between a TCP connection "close" vs "disconnect".
If you close the socket connection from server using socket.close() then you will get exception in client side, if you try to read from that connection or vice versa.
However, if one side just disappears(shut down the program) then the other side has no way of knowing that. So the other side will wait for response for read call.
The TCP protocol was designed to be reliable in hostile communication environments and it will not normally decide a connection is closed just because it has not heard from the other side for a while.
I'm developing an application that can control mouse from android phone. The problem is communication is very slow with socket mouse lags while moving. I want to move mouse pointer as the user moves his finger on screen. How can I optimize this code?
On computer side I'm using this code
try {
serverSocket = new ServerSocket(4444);
} catch (IOException e) {
System.out.println("Could not listen on port: 4444");
}
System.out.println("Server started. Listening to the port 4444");
while (true) {
try {
clientSocket = serverSocket.accept();
inputStreamReader = new InputStreamReader(
clientSocket.getInputStream());
bufferedReader = new BufferedReader(inputStreamReader);
message = bufferedReader.readLine();
System.out.println(message);
Robot robot = new Robot();
switch (message) {
case "first":
ix = MouseInfo.getPointerInfo().getLocation().x;
iy = MouseInfo.getPointerInfo().getLocation().y;
break;
case "lclickp":
robot.mousePress(InputEvent.BUTTON1_DOWN_MASK);
break;
case "lclickr":
robot.mouseRelease(InputEvent.BUTTON1_DOWN_MASK);
break;
//several more cases
} catch (IOException | AWTException ex) {
System.out.println("Problem in message reading");
}
and I'm using this on android side.
private class SendMessage extends AsyncTask<Void, Void, Void> {
#Override
protected Void doInBackground(Void... params) {
try {
client = new Socket(Login.IP, 4444); // connect to the server
printwriter = new PrintWriter(client.getOutputStream(), true);
printwriter.write(messsage); // write the message to output stream
printwriter.flush();
printwriter.close();
client.close(); // closing the connection
} catch (UnknownHostException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
return null;
}
}
Don't create a new connection per message: keep the socket open. At the server end, process multiple messages per accepted socket, until readLine() returns null.
Now I just beginning learning and I'm not good in socket programming but I think the server should wait for new connections in a separate thread because the ServerSocket.accept() method blocks until there is a connection and causes my app frozen at that line.
Thread conWaitingThread = new Thread(new Runnable(){
while (true){
//try
socket = serverSocket.accept();
//catch
}
void startWaiting(){
comWaitingThread.start();
}
void endWaiting(){
if(conWaitingThread.isAlive()){
conWaitingThread.interrupt();
}
}
and for reading msg from client,
while(input.readLine()!=null){
try{
message = input.readLine();
//ur switch case
}catch (ioException e){
//do catch
}
}
For client side, create socket and iostreams once and let them open. Not close the iostreams as closing iostreams closes the respective socket too. May open socket and io in onCreate and close in onDestroy. Be aware that input.readLine() on serverSide waits the new line char and printWriter.write() does not automatically add that. So you may not get any incoming data although printWriter.flush() is called and you need to concat "\n" on writing.
On the PC Side of things:
Consider refactoring into a few helper classes, perhaps, one for Connect, one for sending updates, and one for Disconnect. Then, you will only need to connect and disconnect once per session.
It's good practice to set a tick rate on both the server and client to prevent over-using CPU time and other resources. There is no need to update mouse coordinates more frequently than the refresh rate of typical monitor can update (60fps / 16.6ms) for example.
i am creating a multiple-client/server app whenever any client disconnects from
my server it just hangs.
how can i set any condition that will tell me print some message whenever
any client disconnects from the server
here is my server code
class ServerThread implements Runnable {
public void run() {
Socket socket = null;
try {
System.out.println("server starting.......");
serverSocket = new ServerSocket(SERVERPORT);
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
while (!Thread.currentThread().isInterrupted()) {
try {
System.out.println("Ready to accept.......");
socket = serverSocket.accept();
System.out.println(" client Connected with ip address =" +socket.getRemoteSocketAddress().toString());
CommunicationThread commThread = new CommunicationThread(socket);
new Thread(commThread).start();
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
System.out.println("catch block");
}
}
}
}
class CommunicationThread implements Runnable {
private Socket clientSocket;
private BufferedReader input;
public CommunicationThread(Socket clientSocket) {
this.clientSocket = clientSocket;
try {
this.input = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(this.clientSocket.getInputStream()));
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
public void run() {
while (!Thread.currentThread().isInterrupted()) {
try {
String read = input.readLine();
updateConversationHandler.post(new updateUIThread(read));
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
}
any help will be appreciated
It's not clear whether you mean disconnect because the conversation was over (ie: everything completed successfully) or the disconnect is because of some network problems (or the client canceled the request).
If it's the first case, then it's easy: the protocol you are using (your own, or http, or whatever) is in charge of defining how to determine that a conversation was over. If that situation arises, then you just close the socket.
If it's the second case, then you'd have to have an algorithm in place to determine whether or not the connection must be closed. For instance, by implementing a timeout, or a slow-read threshold. Take a look at the Socket's javadoc for instructions on how to set a timeout.
It's also worth noting that it's fine to create your own servers when you want to practice or learn something, but you'd be better off using an existing solution, like vert.x or a slimmed down version of Wildfly, for instance. The overhead of such servers is very low, nowadays, while still providing very robust networking capabilities.
I am using a thread and a while true loop to listen for message from my server. For some strange reason some messages are getting lost. (I am logging from my server so i am 100% sure that the message is sent, therefore the problem has to be on the client side). This seems to happend when the server is sending messages fast to the client.
Im using the following code to listen for new messages (on my client):
Socket socket;
try {
socket = new Socket(InetAddress.getByName("url.com"), 8080);
is = new DataInputStream(socket.getInputStream());
os = new DataOutputStream(socket.getOutputStream());
} catch (IOException ex) {
Logger.getLogger(Client.class.getName()).log(Level.SEVERE, null, ex);
JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(rootPane,
"Could not establish network connection to the server."
+ " \nPlease check your internet connection and restart the application.",
"Unable to connect",
JOptionPane.INFORMATION_MESSAGE);
WindowEvent wev = new WindowEvent(this, WindowEvent.WINDOW_CLOSING);
Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit().getSystemEventQueue().postEvent(wev);
setVisible(false);
dispose();
System.exit(0);
}
// Starta thread to listen for messages from the server
new ListenFromServer().start();
/*
* Thread class to listen for message from the server
*/
class ListenFromServer extends Thread {
public void run() {
while (true) {
try {
BufferedReader in = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(is));
String tmpMsg = in.readLine().replaceAll("\\r\\n|\\r|\\n", "");
JSONObject json = new JSONObject(tmpMsg);
if(json.get("type").toString().contains("preview")) {
System.out.println("PREVIEW: " + json.get("msg").toString());
}
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
}
You shouldn't be creating a new BufferedReader to receive each message. If two messages arrive in quick succession, it could pull multiple messages out of is, and then you're discarding the contents. Declare in outside of your while loop (and handle the close condition appropriately).
I think what you want is a ServerSocket -- it listens and handles a queue of incoming connections (default size 50) so that you don't lose connections. As your code is, if a connection is attempted in the time between one connection getting established and the loop coming around to connect() again, there wouldn't be anything listening.
I'm working on a web server for Android and even though I've spent days trying to fix it, I'm at my wits' end with this particular bug. I'm trying to read the request from the browser, and the code works fine most of the time, but something like 5% of the requests fail and it throws random SocketTimeoutExceptions without even reading a single character from the Socket.
I have tested this with different browsers and it happens with all of them, so chances are the problem is on my end. Here's the relevant code, stripped down as far as possible:
public class ServerThread extends Thread {
private ServerSocket ss = null;
private boolean isRunning;
private ExecutorService threadPool = new ThreadPoolExecutor(2, 12,
60L, TimeUnit.SECONDS,
new SynchronousQueue<Runnable>(),
Executors.defaultThreadFactory(),
new ThreadPoolExecutor.CallerRunsPolicy());
public ServerThread() {
}
public synchronized void run() {
ss = new ServerSocket(8080, 1);
isRunning = true;
while (isRunning) {
Socket clientSocket = null;
try {
if (ss != null) {
clientSocket = ss.accept();
if (isRunning) {
this.threadPool.execute(new HTTPSession(clientSocket));
}
}
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
}
And:
public class HTTPSession implements Runnable {
private Socket mSocket = null;
public HTTPSession (Socket s) {
mSocket = s;
}
public void run() {
InputStream ips = null;
try {
mSocket.setSoTimeout(15000);
ips = mSocket.getInputStream();
ips.read();
}
catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
Log.v("HTTPSession", "Socket connected: " + mSocket.isConnected() + ", Socket closed: " + mSocket.isClosed() + ", InputShutdown: " + mSocket.isInputShutdown());
}
finally {
try { ips.close(); } catch (IOException ioe) { }
try { mSocket.close(); } catch (IOException ioe) { }
}
}
}
So ServerThread accepts the connection, HTTPSession tries to read from the Socket and sometimes it throws the SocketTimeoutException after the 15 seconds are up.
The output from the Log statement in the catch in this case is:
Socket connected: true, Socket closed: false, InputShutDown: false
What gives? Surely 15 seconds is enough of a wait and it seems unlikely that mainstream web browsers just aren't sending any data, so why can't I read it?
I would appreciate any input on this problem.
SocketTimeoutException only means one thing: no data was available within the timeout period. So yes maybe your timeout is too short, and yes the browser didn't send it within the timeout period, or at least it didn't arrive at the server's socket receive buffer within the timeout period.
I would say 15 seconds is a bit aggressive for a server side timeout. 30s to a couple of minutes would be more like it.
I don't see any reason this code would fail in that way unless, like you said, a browser just wasn't sending anything. You could change the ips.read(); to System.out.println(ips.read()); to be sure of that. If you see a byte show up on stdout, then the browser did send something. My guess would be that in your full code, you're not properly recognizing the end of a request and continuing to wait for more data. After 15 seconds, you'll time out. But that's just a guess. If you post some code that demonstrates the problem, someone might be able to give you a definitive answer.