In our application we have upgraded from Hibernate 3.5.6-final to 4.2.21.Final and now we are getting a ConcurrentModificationException when a database transaction is committed:
java.util.ConcurrentModificationException: null
at java.util.ArrayList$Itr.checkForComodification(ArrayList.java:901)
at java.util.ArrayList$Itr.next(ArrayList.java:851)
at org.hibernate.engine.spi.ActionQueue.executeActions(ActionQueue.java:386)
at org.hibernate.engine.spi.ActionQueue.executeActions(ActionQueue.java:304)
at org.hibernate.event.internal.AbstractFlushingEventListener.performExecutions(AbstractFlushingEventListener.java:349)
at org.hibernate.event.internal.DefaultFlushEventListener.onFlush(DefaultFlushEventListener.java:56)
at org.hibernate.internal.SessionImpl.flush(SessionImpl.java:1195)
at org.hibernate.internal.SessionImpl.managedFlush(SessionImpl.java:404)
at org.hibernate.engine.transaction.internal.jdbc.JdbcTransaction.beforeTransactionCommit(JdbcTransaction.java:101)
at org.hibernate.engine.transaction.spi.AbstractTransactionImpl.commit(AbstractTransactionImpl.java:175)
Is this a known issue with Hibernate 4.2?
The exception turned out to be caused by a problem with a Hibernate custom constraint validator we use. The validator's isValid was running a Hibernate criteria query. The query triggered a Hibernate session flush which resulted in the ConcurrentModificationException. We fixed the problem by temporarily disabling auto flush in the isValid method:
#Override
public boolean isValid(Object object, final ConstraintValidatorContext c) {
try {
sessionFactory.getCurrentSession().setFlushMode(FlushMode.MANUAL);
...
} finally {
sessionFactory.getCurrentSession().setFlushMode(FlushMode.AUTO);
}
}
The problem may also manifest itself as a StackOverflowError.
I had this with hibernate 5.0.11 and verified it happened also with 5.2.5. My solution was to annotate the custom validator to open new transaction.
#Transactional(propagation=Propagation.REQUIRES_NEW)
I guess hibernate has still some way to go before custom constraint validators are made easy to setup and use since this took me way more time than it should.
Edit: Issue related. I think using the same transaction violates jpa2.1 specs https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-7537
In the class which implements a ConstraintValidator, we need to have an instance of EntityManager but we are not in a Spring context in order to instanciate automatically an EntityManager object with annotation #Autowired. So, in the configuration package, we can write a factory wich allows to have an instance of Application in order to instanciate beans when we are not in a Spring context.
#Configuration
public class ApplicationContextConf {
#Bean
public static ApplicationContextProvider contextProvider() {
return new ApplicationContextProvider();
}
}
#Component
public class ApplicationContextProvider implements ApplicationContextAware {
private static ApplicationContext context;
public ApplicationContext getApplicationContext() {
return context;
}
#Override
public void setApplicationContext(final ApplicationContext ctx) {
context = ctx;
}
}
In the class which implements a ConstraintValidator, we instanciate an EntityManager thanks to the factory created previously in the method initialize.
Before to call to a method which calls the repository, we change the flush mode of the Hibernate current session to FlushMode.MANUAL in order to avoid having the automatic flush after the call to the repository while keeping the default flush mode. In the block finally, we restore the default value of the flush mode previously retained.
private EntityManager entityManager;
#Override
public void initialize(final Object object ) {
// ...
try {
this.entityManager = ApplicationContextConf
.contextProvider()
.getApplicationContext()
.getBean(EntityManager.class);
}
catch (final BeansException ex) {
// ...
}
}
#Override
public boolean isValid(final Object object, final ConstraintValidatorContext context) {
Session hibernateSession = null;
FlushMode originalFlushMode = null;
try {
hibernateSession = this.entityManager.unwrap(Session.class);
originalFlushMode = hibernateSession.getFlushMode();
hibernateSession.setFlushMode(FlushMode.MANUAL);
// ...
}
finally {
if (hibernateSession != null) {
hibernateSession.setFlushMode(originalFlushMode);
}
}
}
Related
I am facing a problem due which is unknown to me, can you one have faced this problem?
JSON mapping problem: <package>ApiResponse["data"]; nested exception is com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.JsonMappingException: possible non-threadsafe access to the session (through reference chain: <package>.ApiResponse["data"])
I have a standard API response pojo. Which I return every time with ResponseEntity. Everything is working fine, but sometimes I got that above error. I don't why this error occurred .
I got the below log from console
an assertion failure occurred (this may indicate a bug in Hibernate, but is more likely due to unsafe use of the session): org.hibernate.AssertionFailure: possible non-threadsafe access to the session
org.hibernate.AssertionFailure: possible non-threadsafe access to the session
I think you are trying to share same Hibernate session within multiple threads. That's illegal.
Hibernate Sessions are not thread-safe whereas Hibernate SessionFactory is thread-safe.
So, make a separate DAO layer. Create single sessionfactory object and share it among the DAO classes.
Get a session for a single-threaded DB operation and close the session in that thread.
For example :
#Repository
public class DAO {
#Autowired
private SessionFactory sessionFactory;
public class performDBOperation(Object obj) {
Session session = sessionFactory.currentSession();
session.save(obj);
session.close();
}
}
Now, I have looked at your github code.
I saw the code Exec.java
#Service
public interface Exec {
#Async
#Transactional
public void run();
}
This is incorrect.
Updated :
public interface Exec {
public void run();
}
Update ExecImpl to this :
#Service
public class ExecImpl implements Exec {
#Autowired
private ExecDAO execDAO;
#Override
#Async
#Transactional
public void run() {
// example : create an object to save it.
Object object = ...;
execDAO.saveItem(object);
}
}
Create DAO layer :
Suppose ExecDAO interface and implementation ExecDAOImpl :
public interface ExecDAO {
public void saveItem(Object obj);
// keep here abstract method to perform DB operation
}
#Repository
public class ExecDAOImpl implements ExecDAO {
#Autowired
private SessionFactory sessionFactory;
#Override
public void saveItem(Object obj) {
Session session = sessionFactory.currentSession();
session.save(obj);
session.close();
}
}
Looking at the code at the link you shared in the comment, I think that
#Async
#Transactional
is a dangerous thing.
I would suggest you to extract a method to do the transactions and try
what I mean is that,
interface ExecImpl{
#Async
void run(){
someThingElse.doTransaction();
}
}
interface SomeThingElse{
#Transactional
void doTransaction();
}
I am still not convinced this will help you. But this is something you can try.
I would also suggest to use readonly transactions for getting data and not have a single transaction for all purposes.
This blog explains why its not good to use these two annotations together whether on a class or on an interface
I am facing some issue with transactions configured in my code.
Below is the code with transactions which writes data to DB.
Writer.java
class Writer {
#Inject
private SomeDAO someDAO;
#Transactional(propagation = Propagation.REQUIRES_NEW)
public void write(){
this.batchWrite();
}
private void batchWrite () {
try {
someDAO.writeToTable1(true);
} catch(Exception ex) {
someDAO.writeToTable1(false);
}
someDAO.writeToTable2();
}
}
SomeDAO.java
class SomeDAO {
#Inject
private JdbcTemplate JdbcTemplate;
public void writeToTable1(boolean flag) {
// Writes data to table 1 using jdbcTemplate
jdbcTemplate.update();
}
pulic void writeToTable2() {
// Writes data to table 2 using jdbcTemplate
jdbcTemplate.update();
}
}
Here data is getting stored into table 1 properly but sometimes, table 2 is getting skipped.
I am not sure how this is happening as both the tables have been written within same transaction.
Either transaction is partially committing the data or partially rolling back.
I have doubt that in the SomeDAO class I am injecting JdbcTemplate object which is creating new connection instead of using existing connection of transaction.
Can anyone please help me here?
Try binding a Transaction Manager bean having your jdbcTemplate inside #Transactional:
//Create a bean
#Bean
public PlatformTransactionManager txnManager() throws Exception {
return new DataSourceTransactionManager(jdbcTemplate().getDataSource());
}
And then use this transaction manager in #Transactional("txnManager").
I imagine that this is a common problem, but after some searching I wasn't able to find anything relevant.
The problem I'm having is that I'm getting a No Hibernate Session bound to thread exception when annotating my resource method with #UnitOfWork and inside my resource method, making an asynchronous DAO call. The idea behind this design is to make the database call on a separate I/O thread so that it frees up the Jersey resource thread.
Unfortunately, as the exception says, this RxIoScheduler-2 thread doesn't have a hibernate session bound to it.
Any suggestions?
Hibernate Session is not thread safe, so we need a strategy how to get the current session for the current thread. Such strategy is called CurrentSessionContext.
The current session is a session which we get by this call:
sessionFactory.getCurrentSession()
Hibernate can be configured with various current session strategies. #UnitOfWork uses this strategy:
hibernate.current_session_context_class = managed
For this strategy you should put a session to the context by an explicit call of the
ManagedSessionContext.bind(session)
So, as we know a Session is not thread safe, you should create a new session for a separate thread and put that session in the ManagedSessionContext. After that you can call your DAO by the same way as in the endpoint methods with #UnitOfWork.
Keep in mind that you should unbind the session before closing it with
ManagedSessionContext.unbind(factory)
You can use this utility class to create a session for a separate thread:
public final class HibernateSessionUtils {
private HibernateSessionUtils() {
}
public static void request(SessionFactory factory, Runnable request) {
request(factory, () -> {
request.run();
return null;
});
}
public static <T> T request(SessionFactory factory, Supplier<T> request) {
Transaction txn = null;
Session session = factory.openSession();
try {
ManagedSessionContext.bind(session);
txn = session.beginTransaction();
T result = request.get();
commit(txn);
return result;
} catch (Throwable th) {
rollback(txn);
throw Throwables.propagate(th);
} finally {
session.close();
ManagedSessionContext.unbind(factory);
}
}
private static void rollback(Transaction txn) {
if (txn != null && txn.isActive()) {
txn.rollback();
}
}
private static void commit(Transaction txn) {
if (txn != null && txn.isActive()) {
txn.commit();
}
}
}
Throwables from guava.
It can be used by this way
List<Campaign> getCampaigns(SessionFactory factory, CampaignDao dao) {
return HibernateSessionUtils.request(
factory,
dao::getCampaigns
);
}
In the dao.getCampaigns() method you can get the session
sessionFactory.getCurrentSession()
You can inject the factory everywhere using Guice.
Other option is to use UnitOfWorkAwareProxyFactory.
I'm having an error each time I update an entity using Hibernate.
Here's my story:
I have a service with an annotation #Transactional and is calling a DAO.update method.
#Service
#Transactional
public class FooServiceImpl implements FooService {
#Inject
private FooDAO fooDAO;
#Override
public Foo update(Foo foo) {
return fooDAO.update(foo);
}
#Override
public Foo find(int fooId) {
return fooDAO.findById(fooId);
}
}
I have an AOP which catch the DAO.update in order to make some operations.
#Aspect
#Order(2)
#Component
public class FooTackerAspect {
#Inject
private FooService fooService;
#Inject
private SessionFactoryManager sessionFactoryManager;
#Pointcut("execution(* com.foo.bar.FooService.update(..))")
public void methodToTrack() {}
#Around("methodToTrack")
public Object track(final ProceedingJoinPoint joinPoint) throws Throwable {
int fooId = fetchIdFromJoinPoint(joinPoint);
Foo foo = fooService.find(fooId);
// Do some operations
// I close the session in order to avoid the exception
// org.hibernate.NonUniqueObjectException: a different object with
// the same identifier value was already associated with the session
sessionFactoryManager.getSessionFactory(DataSource.FOO)
.getCurrentSession().close();
Object retVal = joinPoint.proceed();
return retVal;
}
}
However, after updating the entity (fooDAO.update(foo)), I get the following error:
2056953 [http-bio-8080-exec-4] ERROR o.s.t.s.TransactionSynchronizationUtils - TransactionSynchronization.beforeCompletion threw exception
java.lang.IllegalStateException: No value for key [org.hibernate.impl.SessionFactoryImpl#762d6271] bound to thread [http-bio-8080-exec-4]
at org.springframework.transaction.support.TransactionSynchronizationManager.unbindResource(TransactionSynchronizationManager.java:209) ~[spring-tx-3.2.4.RELEASE.jar:3.2.4.RELEASE]
at org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.SpringSessionSynchronization.beforeCompletion(SpringSessionSynchronization.java:193) ~[spring-orm-3.2.4.RELEASE.jar:3.2.4.RELEASE]
at org.springframework.transaction.support.TransactionSynchronizationUtils.triggerBeforeCompletion(TransactionSynchronizationUtils.java:106) ~[spring-tx-3.2.4.RELEASE.jar:3.2.4.RELEASE]
at org.springframework.transaction.support.AbstractPlatformTransactionManager.triggerBeforeCompletion(AbstractPlatformTransactionManager.java:938) [spring-tx-3.2.4.RELEASE.jar:3.2.4.RELEASE]
at org.springframework.transaction.support.AbstractPlatformTransactionManager.processCommit(AbstractPlatformTransactionManager.java:739) [spring-tx-3.2.4.RELEASE.jar:3.2.4.RELEASE]
at org.springframework.transaction.support.AbstractPlatformTransactionManager.commit(AbstractPlatformTransactionManager.java:724) [spring-tx-3.2.4.RELEASE.jar:3.2.4.RELEASE]
at org.springframework.transaction.interceptor.TransactionAspectSupport.commitTransactionAfterReturning(TransactionAspectSupport.java:475) [spring-tx-3.2.4.RELEASE.jar:3.2.4.RELEASE]
at org.springframework.transaction.interceptor.TransactionAspectSupport.invokeWithinTransaction(TransactionAspectSupport.java:270) [spring-tx-3.2.4.RELEASE.jar:3.2.4.RELEASE]
at org.springframework.transaction.interceptor.TransactionInterceptor.invoke(TransactionInterceptor.java:94) [spring-tx-3.2.4.RELEASE.jar:3.2.4.RELEASE]
at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:172) [spring-aop-3.2.4.RELEASE.jar:3.2.4.RELEASE]
at org.springframework.aop.framework.JdkDynamicAopProxy.invoke(JdkDynamicAopProxy.java:204) [spring-aop-3.2.4.RELEASE.jar:3.2.4.RELEASE]
at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy112.update(Unknown Source) [$Proxy112.class:na]
This error is not blocking (the update still goes through). But I want to correct this error.
Do you have any idea how I can do that?
I think the error comes from the fact I closed the session. But I have to close it in order to update the entity.
As #kriegaex said, the problem comes from the fact I'm using the same session to do the find and update operations.
Given that information, I use this following workaround (which works): I use two separate sessions, one for find and the other for update.
#Repository
public class FooDAOImpl implements FooDAO {
private FooHibernateDaoSupport hibernateDaoSupport;
public FooDAOImpl() {
// Init DaoSupport
}
#Override
public Foo findById(final Serializable fooId) {
StatelessSession session = hibernateDaoSupport.getSessionFactory().openStatelessSession();
Foo foo = (Foo) session.get(Foo.class, fooId);
session.close;
return foo;
}
#Override
public Foo update(Foo foo) {
getHibernateTemplate().update(entity);
return entity;
}
}
With this solution, there is no need to close the session in my advice code anymore.
NB: I'm opening a stateless session because in my project FooService.update also calls FooService.find in order to set some attributes, so I do not want to have the modifications in my advice code.
I have two services, like this (simplified code):
#Service
public class OuterService {
#Autowired
InnerService innerService;
#Transactional
public void doSomething() {
List<SomeEntity> list = entityRepo.findByWhatever(...);
for(SomeEntity listElement : list) {
innerService.processEntity(listElement);
}
}
}
#Service
public class InnerService {
#Transactional(propagation = Propagation.REQUIRES_NEW)
public void processEntity(Entity entity) {
// ...
StatusElement status = new StatusElement(...);
statusElementRepo.save(status);
}
}
The constructed StatusElement is now inserted by exiting InnerService.processEntity() and inserted again by exiting OuterService.doSomething().
If I change the #Transactional annotation of OuterService.doSomething() to #Transactional(readOnly = true), it is inserted just once.
Is it a problem with MySql (because it may not support nested transactions), do I need a special transaction manager, or is there something wrong with my code? TIA!
I solved it by using programmatically transactions using the PlatformTransactionManager.
see: http://docs.spring.io/spring/docs/current/spring-framework-reference/html/transaction.html#transaction-programmatic-ptm