Here's my RegExp checker which currently doesn't work:
String pattern = "(?=.*[0-9]{3})(?=.*[a-z])(?=.*[A-Z])(?=.*[##$%^&+=]{1})(?=\\S+$).{5,15}";
Here are the parameters I cannot meet yet:
5-15 characters {5,15}
exactly 3 digits (?=.*[0-9]{3})
Neither the character limit nor the digit check are working, and I can't find any examples for some reason. Where I am I going wrong? Clearly it's a placement issue, as I'm a total novice. Any help would be appreciated. The others (at least one upper/lowercase/special) I can meet, but these two simple pieces I'm still struggling with.
For three digits checking add this anywhere in your regex as you are using positive lookahead.
(?=^([^0-9]*[0-9]){3}[^0-9]*$)
For 5-15 digit check add this one:
(?=^.{5,15}$)
You can use the regex on the site https://regex101.com/ and it will give you the explanation on the right hand side.
[0-9]{3} is 3 consecutive integers. To allow three integers somewhere in the string you need to check for each integer part.
(?=^[^0-9]*[0-9][^0-9]*[0-9][^0-9]*[0-9][^0-9]*$)
.{5,15} is 5 to 15 characters but that is anywhere in the string, to have it affect the whole string that needs to be anchored. So your full expression should be:
^(?=^[^0-9]*[0-9][^0-9]*[0-9][^0-9]*[0-9][^0-9]*$)(?=.*[a-z])(?=.*[A-Z])(?=.*[##$%^&+=]{1})(?=\\S+$).{5,15}$
Demo: https://regex101.com/r/UVK7ev/1
Related
I am trying to find a regex for the following user generated possibilities:
÷2%3%x#4%2$#
OR
÷2%x#4%2$#
OR
÷2%x#4$#
OR
÷2%x#
To understand the expression, it is a fraction whose numerator lies between
the ÷ and the first %, and the denominator lies from first % to the #.
But, the denominator has an exponent, which lies from the # to $.
The user can input whatever number he/she desires, but the structure stays the same. Notice that the number can also be a decimal.
The structure is as follows: ÷(a number, if its two or more digits a % will be in between the digits)x(a group that consists of a number(s), also the symbols # , $ and a %(s) which can also alternate between the digits)#
Remember, the number can be a decimal number.
I am trying to use the following regex with no success:
"[÷]-?\\d+(\\.\\d*)?[%](-?\\d+(\\.\\d*)?){0,1}[x]([#]-?\\d+(\\.\\d*)?[$]){0,1}[#]"
I think that the group (-?\d+(\.\d*)?){0,1} is complicating things up.
Also, I have not accounted for the % within this group which could occur.
any suggestions, thank you
Edit: Deleted the old post content.
According to your new testcases I improved your regex to match all cases and simplified the regex:
÷[0-9%]+?x(#[0-9%]+?\$)?# OR ÷[\d%]+?x(#[\d%]+?\$)?#
Note:
The [] mark groups of allowed characters so it has no use to have the parenthesis.
Also [÷][0-9]+[0-9[%]]+? is just the same as ÷[0-9]+[0-9%]+? the first part in your example matches any number 0-9 n-times and then you check for either (0-9 or %) for n-times (non greedy fetching). So instead you can just use the second check for the whole thing.
By wrapping the exponent in a regex-class: () we can make the whole exponent optional with ? ==> this will make your 4th test-case work.
You could also substitute 0-9 with \d (any digit) if you want.
I found a regex that works, I tested from the bottom up:
Here it is:
[÷][0-9[%][\\.]]+?[x][0-9[%][\\.][#][$]]*?[#]
This regex works for all types of cases. Even those that include decimal numbers, or not exponents.
the group [0-9[%][\.][#][$]]*? allows the regex to search for exponent, which can occur zero(that's why the * is there) or more times and the ? makes it optional. Similarly, I followed the same idea for the coefficient of x(read the post if you don't know where the coefficient lies) and the numerator. Thank you for everyone that put effort in brainstorming this problem. I have chosen to use my answer for my programming.
I am developing a Java method, which checks, if the user input is valid. For that I wrote four regular expressions to check that. The first three work fine. The last one, the "most complex" regular expression, does not accept values, which should be accepted.
I want to make sure, that the user entered one of three different input settings.
One to six "L" followed by a number from 1-16
One to six "R" followed by a number from 1-16
One B followed by a number from 1-16
My problem is to define, that only numbers from 1-16 will be accepted. My regular expression is accepting 1-9, but not any number above 9.
Let's take the "B"-case for example, than this is my regular expression:
String regexB = "B[([1-9]{1})((1[0-6]){1})]";
What I tried to do with my expression:
One "B", followed by one single number from 1-9 OR by a "1" and a second single number from 0-6.
I know, that this is possibly not a hard question, but maybe one of you guys is able to save me from losing some time by trying to solve this.
Thanking you in anticipation.
String regexB = "B([1][0-6]|[1-9])";
B
a digit 1 and 0-6 OR
a digit between 1 and 9
I think your regexp is invalid.
Try the following (for B example)
B((1{1}[0-6]{1})|([1-9]{1}))
String regexB = "B([1-9]|([1][0-6]))";
edit: oh ... the answer is already there ...
Here is a tool that will help you: http://utilitymill.com/utility/Regex_For_Range.
In your case: [1-9]|1[0-6]
I've written a regular expression that matches any number of letters with any number of single spaces between the letters. I would like that regular expression to also enforce a minimum and maximum number of characters, but I'm not sure how to do that (or if it's possible).
My regular expression is:
[A-Za-z](\s?[A-Za-z])+
I realized it was only matching two sets of letters surrounding a single space, so I modified it slightly to fix that. The original question is still the same though.
Is there a way to enforce a minimum of three characters and a maximum of 30?
Yes
Just like + means one or more you can use {3,30} to match between 3 and 30
For example [a-z]{3,30} matches between 3 and 30 lowercase alphabet letters
From the documentation of the Pattern class
X{n,m} X, at least n but not more than m times
In your case, matching 3-30 letters followed by spaces could be accomplished with:
([a-zA-Z]\s){3,30}
If you require trailing whitespace, if you don't you can use: (2-29 times letter+space, then letter)
([a-zA-Z]\s){2,29}[a-zA-Z]
If you'd like whitespaces to count as characters you need to divide that number by 2 to get
([a-zA-Z]\s){1,14}[a-zA-Z]
You can add \s? to that last one if the trailing whitespace is optional. These were all tested on RegexPlanet
If you'd like the entire string altogether to be between 3 and 30 characters you can use lookaheads adding (?=^.{3,30}$) at the beginning of the RegExp and removing the other size limitations
All that said, in all honestly I'd probably just test the String's .length property. It's more readable.
This is what you are looking for
^[a-zA-Z](\s?[a-zA-Z]){2,29}$
^ is the start of string
$ is the end of string
(\s?[a-zA-Z]){2,29} would match (\s?[a-zA-Z]) 2 to 29 times..
Actually Benjamin's answer will lead to the complete solution to the OP's question.
Using lookaheads it is possible to restrict the total number of characters AND restrict the match to a set combination of letters and (optional) single spaces.
The regex that solves the entire problem would become
(?=^.{3,30}$)^([A-Za-z][\s]?)+$
This will match AAA, A A and also fail to match AA A since there are two consecutive spaces.
I tested this at http://regexpal.com/ and it does the trick.
You should use
[a-zA-Z ]{20}
[For allowed characters]{for limiting of the number of characters}
I want to create a regular expression in java using standard libraries that will accommodate the following sentence:
12 of 128
Obviously the numbers can be anything though... From 1 digit to many
Also, I'm not sure how to accommodate the word "of" but I thought maybe something along the lines of:
[\d\sof\s\d]
This should work for you:
(\d+\s+of\s+\d+)
This will assume that you want to capture the full block of text as "one group", and there can be one-or-more whitespace characters in between each (if only one space, you can change \s+ to just \s).
If you want to capture the numbers separately, you can try:
(\d+)\s+of\s+(\d+)
You want this:
\d+\sof\s\d+
The relevant change from what you already had is the addition of the two plus signs. That means, that it should match multiple digits but at least one.
Sample: http://regexr.com?32cao
This regexp
"\\d+ of \\d+"
will match at least one to any number of digits, followed by string " of " followed by one to any number of digits.
i am pretty ok with basic reg-ex. but this line of code used to make the thousand separation in large numbers exceeds my knowledge and googling it quite a bit did also not satisfy my curiosity. can one of u please take a minute to explain to me the following line of code?
someString.replaceAll("(\\G-?\\d{1,3})(?=(?:\\d{3})++(?!\\d))", "$1,");
i especially don't understand the regex structure "(?=(?:\d{3})++(?!\d))".
thanks a lot in advance.
"(?=(?:\d{3})++(?!\d))" is a lookahead assertion.
It means "only match if followed by ((three digits that we don't need to capture) repeated one or more times (and again repeated one or more times) (not followed by a digit))". See this explanation about (?:...) notation. It's called non-capturing group and means you don't need to reference this group after the match.
"(\\G-?\\d{1,3})" is the part that should actually match (but only if the above-described conditions are met).
Edit: I think + must be a special character, otherwise it's just a plus. If it's a special character (and quick search suggests that it is in Java, too), the second one is redundant.
Edit 2: Thanks to Alan Moore, it's now clear. The second + means possessive matching, so it means that if after checking as many 3-digit groups as possible it won't find that they're not followed by a non-digit, the engine will immediately give up instead of stepping one 3-digit group back.
this expression has some advanced stuff in it.
first , the easiest: \d{3} means exactly three digits. These are your thousands.
then: the ++ is a variant of + (which means one or more), but possessive, which means it will eat all of the thousands. Im not completely sure why this is necessary.
?:means it is a non-capturing group - i think this is just there for performance reasons and could be omitted.
?=is a positive lookahead - i think this means it is only checked whether that group exists but will not count towards the matched string - meaning it wont be replaced.
?! is a negative lookahead - i dont quite understand that but i think it means it must NOT match, which in turn means there cannot be another digit at the end of the matched sequence. This makes sure the first group gets the right digits. E.g. 10000 can only be matched as 10(000) but not 1(000)0 if you see what i mean.
Through the lookaheads, if i understand it correctly (i havent tested it), only the first group would actually be replaced, as it is the one that matches.
To me, the most interesting part of that regex is the \G. It took me a while to remember what it's for: to prevent adding commas to the fraction part if there is one. If the regex were simply:
(-?\d{1,3})(?=(?:\d{3})++(?!\d))
...this number:
12345.67890
...would end up as:
12,345.67,890
But adding \G to the beginning means a match can only start at the beginning of the string or at the position where the previous match ended. So it doesn't match 345 because of the . following it, and it doesn't match 67 because it would have to skip over some of the string to do so. And so it correctly returns:
12,345.67890
I know this isn't an answer to the question, but I thought it was worth a mention.