We Keep Coding

How to Lazy load all the Spring beans whether it is defined by #Bean or #Component in Springboot 2.2

I am writing a spring application which is interactive and basically handles lots of commands like create, list, update, delete various types of resources.
For now, just assume a single run of the application handles only a single command and the program exits.
For all the classes to validate command, execute the command, required factory classes for each resource there is a separate class and each class is annotated with #Component annotation for spring to manage all the components.
There are also some of the manually defined beans by #Bean method.
Now that my application first identifies what kind of command is executed (create, delete, list, update, etc), I want the only beans of that command to be created and Autowired wherever required (after taking command from user) and I want to avoid the creation of dozens of beans related to other commands.
On searching, I came to know about Lazy instantiation of Beans that spring provides.
However, I am not sure if it is the weapon I am searching for.
What I tried
Very first I found #Lazy annotation, but since I want to lazily load all the Beans, I don't want to write #Lazy everywhere in each class.
Then I found setting below property in application.yml does the work.
spring:
main:
lazy-initialization: true
I tried that but still, it is not lazily creating the beans.
My application.yml files looks like this
spring:
main:
lazy-initialization: true
My main SpringBootApplication file looks like this:
#Slf4j
#SpringBootApplication
public class SpringBootApplication {
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println("Loading Application...");
ApplicationContext context = SpringApplication.run(SpringBootApplication.class, args);
final AtomicInteger counter = new AtomicInteger(0);
log.info("**************** START: Total Bean Objects: {} ******************", context.getBeanDefinitionCount());
Arrays.asList(context.getBeanDefinitionNames())
.forEach(beanName -> {
log.info("{}) Bean Name: {} ", counter.incrementAndGet(), beanName);
});
log.info("**************** END: Total Bean: {} ******************", context.getBeanDefinitionCount());
}
}
My other classes looks like this:
#Component
#RequiredArgsConstructor(onConstructor = #__(#Autowired))
public class MyClass1 implements ResourceCreator<MyClass2, MyClass3> {
private final RequestValidatorImpl requestValidator;
private final ResourceCreator resourceCreator;
#Override
public MyClass2 toImplementFunction(MyClass3 myclass3) {
//logic
}
On running the application, It prints all the classes where I annotated #Component as well as beans created by #Bean method.
I have also tried using below in Application.properties but still no use.
spring.main.lazy-initialization=true
Also, if you wish, please comment on whether I should use #Component for each Class like I am using or not and what is better practice instead.

I think you misunderstood the meaning of the lazy flag you are passing,
It means that the object will be created only when it is invoked but it does not say that it will not scan that package. Spring will scan all packages and store bean definition names but it will create the objects only when it is invoked, if you have passed the lazy flag to it.
You can verify this behaviour by checking the number of beans created when you pass the lazy flag as true and false.
you can check it as given below
ApplicationContext context = SpringApplication.run(SpringBootApplication.class, args);
System.out.println("count:"+context.getBeanDefinitionCount());
Edit on Apr/7th 2020 start
Another way to do that is create a constructor and use that to inject the autowired properties and print out a log when they enter the constructor.
I did the same in a sample project and below is he result, first one is for eager initialization and next one for lazy.
spring.main.lazy-initialization=false
Application logs
Inside Constructor
calling bean
inside bean method
spring.main.lazy-initialization=true
Application logs
calling bean
Inside Constructor
inside bean method
Edit on Apr/7th 2020 end
Please mark this as answered if I answered your question.
Thank you

Long story short:
For anyone wanting to lazily initialize their whole Spring Boot context, setting this property to true is the way to go:
spring.main.lazy-initialization=true
Pro tip:
It can be used in combination with the #Lazy annotation, set to false; so all the defined beans will use lazy initialization, except for those that we explicitly configure with #Lazy(false).
In such a way, the lazy initialization becomes opt-out instead of the default opt-in.

Why is #Bean(initMethod="") not detecting given method in spring?

Edit Fixed by changing package.
I have this configuration file for spring framework
#Configuration
public class AppConfig {
#Bean(initMethod = "populateCache")
public AccountRepository accountRepository(){
return new JdbcAccountRepository();
}
}
JdbcAccountRepository looks like this.
#Repository
public class JdbcAccountRepository implements AccountRepository {
#Override
public Account findByAccountId(long
return new SavingAccount();
}
public void populateCache() {
System.out.println("Populating Cache");
}
public void clearCache(){
System.out.println("Clearing Cache");
}
}
I'm new to spring framework and trying to use initMethod or destroyMethod. Both of these method are showing following errors.
Caused by: org.springframework.beans.factory.support.BeanDefinitionValidationException: Could not find an init method named 'populateCache' on bean with name 'accountRepository'
Here is my main method.
public class BeanLifeCycleDemo {
public static void main(String[] args) {
ConfigurableApplicationContext applicationContext = new
AnnotationConfigApplicationContext(AppConfig.class);
AccountRepository bean = applicationContext.getBean(AccountRepository.class);
applicationContext.close();
}
}
Edit
I was practicing from a book and had created many packages for different chapters. Error was it was importing different JdbcAccountRepository from different package that did not have that method. I fixed it and it works now. I got hinted at this from answers.

Like you said, if you are mixing configurations types, it can be confusing. Besides, even if you created a Bean of type AccountRepository, because Spring does a lot of things at runtime, it can call your initMethod, even if the compiler couldn't.
So yes, if you have many beans with the same type, Spring can be confused an know which one to call, hence your exception.
Oh and by the way, having a Configuration creating the accountRepoisitory Bean, you can remove the #Repository from your JdbcAccountRepository... It is either #Configuration + #Bean or #Component/Repository/Service + #ComponentScan.
TL;DR
Here is more information and how Spring creates your bean : What object are injected by Spring ?
#Bean(initMethod = "populateCache")
public AccountRepository accountRepository(){
return new JdbcAccountRepository();
}
With this code, Spring will :
Detect that you want to add a Bean in the application Context
The bean information are retrieved from the method signature. In your case, it will create a bean of type AccountRepository named accountRepository... That's all Spring knows, it won't look inside your method body.
Once Spring is done analysing your classpath, or scanning the bean definitions, it will start instanciating your object.
It will therefor creates your bean accountRepository of type AccountRepository.
But Spring is "clever" and nice with us. Even if you couldn't write this code without your compiler yelling at you, Spring can still call your method.
To make sure, try writing this code :
AccountRepository accountRepository = new JdbcAccountRepository();
accountRepository.populateCache(); // Compiler error => the method is not found.
But it works for Spring... Magic.
My recommandation, but you might thinking the same now: If you have classes across many packages to answer different business case, then rely on #Configuration classes. #ComponentScan is great to kickstart your development, but reach its limit when your application grows...

You mix two different ways of spring bean declaration:
Using #Configuration classes. Spring finds all beans annotated with #Configuration and uses them as a reference to what beans should be created.
So if you follow this path of configuration - don't use #Repository on beans. Spring will detect it anyway
Using #Repository - other way around - you don't need to use #Configuration in this case. If you decide to use #Repository put #PostConstruct annotation on the method and spring will call it, in this case remove #Configuration altogether (or at least remove #Bean method that creates JdbcAccountRepository)

Annotate populateCache method with #PostConstruct and remove initMethod from #Bean. It will work.

Why #Scheduled annotation doesn't work with #Transaction annotation. Spring Boot [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
Spring3 's #Transactional #Scheduled not committed to DB?
(3 answers)
Closed 2 years ago.
I have a question:
Why when we annotate method with #Scheduled and #Transaction, transaction doesn't work?
I know that the #Scheduled call my class instead of proxy class that created by Spring, but can't understand this behavior.
import org.springframework.scheduling.annotation.Scheduled;
import org.springframework.transaction.annotation.Transactional;
#Service
public class UserServiceImpl implements UserService {
#Override
#Scheduled(fixedRateString = "${somestring}",initialDelayString = "${anotherstring}")
#Transactional
public void doSomething() {
}
}
I have two solutions of this problem:
Call proxy from Scheduled method.
Implement ConcurrentTaskScheduler
and replace object of ScheduledMethodRunnable(that is with my class)
with object of ScheduledMethodRunnable with proxy.
But this solutions is very inconvenient.
Can you explaim me why #Scheduled works like this?
Thank you!

It happens because to process both annotations MAGIC is used.
I suppose there are several things happens:
UserServiceImpl is created.
#Scheduled annotation is processed and reference to bean is stored to invoke it at appropriate time.
#Transactional annotation is processed. It create proxy which store reference to original bean. Original bean is replaced to proxy in application context.
If step 2 and 3 passed in different order then you had no problem.
I don't know how to control order in which annotation is processed. I don't even sure it is possible at all.
There is basically two solution.
Use different kind of magic to process #Transaction. Default way is to create proxy object, but it is possible to instruct Spring to instrument current class.
Split this to two class each of them will have method with only one annotation.
Example:
#Service
public class UserServiceImpl implements UserService {
#Override
#Transactional
public void doSomething() {
}
}
#Service
public class UserServiceScheduler {
#Inject
private UserService service;
#Scheduled(fixedRateString = "${somestring}",initialDelayString = "${anotherstring}")
public void doSomething() {
service.doSomething();
}
}
I'm personally recommend second approach.

The Question is not private or public, the question is: How is it invoked and which AOP implementation you use!
If you use (default) Spring Proxy AOP, then all AOP functionality provided by Spring (like #Transational) will only be taken into account if the call goes through the proxy. -- This is normally the case if the annotated method is invoked from another bean.
This has two implications:
Because private methods must not be invoked from another bean (the exception is reflection), their #Transactional Annotation is not taken into account.
If the method is public, but it is invoked from the same bean, it will not be taken into account either (this statement is only correct if (default) Spring Proxy AOP is used).
you can also use the aspectJ mode, instead of the Spring Proxies, that will overcome the problem. And the AspectJ Transactional Aspects are woven even into private methods (checked for Spring 3.0).
refer: http://docs.spring.io/spring/docs/3.2.4.RELEASE/spring-framework-reference/html/aop.html#aop-proxying

What are the reasons that a Spring #async annotation may have failed to fire?

We're got some code annotated with the Spring #async annotation - which is meant to run the method in a new Thread. In theory - this method should run on startup.
In practice - it is not running at all.
package ...
...
import org.springframework.scheduling.annotation.Async;
...
#Component
public class MyClass {
...
#Async
public void mymethod() {
...
}
}
I'm trying to think of all the possible reasons this could be:
class not in Spring component scan path (not in this case - checked)
My question is: What are the reasons that a Spring #async annotation may have failed to fire?
(Is there a class I can log in case the async execute was attempted and failed?)

These are the situation where #Async was not working for me
#EnableAsync was missing
#Async method was not public
#Async annotated method was called from another method of same class. Probably bypassing the async proxy code and just calling plain method.

SpringMVC #Scope session not creating threads

Say I have the following class...
#Controller
public class WebController {
#Autowired PersonService personService;
#RequestMapping(value = "/get", method = RequestMethod.GET)
#ResponseBody
#Scope("session")
public List<Player> getPerson(String personName) {
return playerService.getByName(personName);
}
}
Now this invokes the following service...
#Service("playerService")
public class PlayerServiceImpl implements PlayerService {
private List<Player> players;
#Override
#Transactional
public List<Player> getByName(final String name) {
if (players == null) {
players = getAll();
}
return getValidPlayers(name);
}
If I initially start my application, players is null, correctly, then when in the same session, I invoke this method again with a new value, players is no longer null, as you would expect. However, no new thread appears to be being created, if I open a new browser window (therefore creating a new session) and invoke this method, it still has the values from the previous session.
Why is #Scope("session") not creating a new thread in the thread pool?
I've specified <context:component-scan base-package="com." /> in my servlet-context as expected, everything works fine apart from the service methods are all acting as singletons rather than creating a new thread per session like say a Java EE container.
If players was marked as static I'd understand.
I've also tried marking my controller as #Scope("session") (as shown below) but this appears to have no impact either. What's the best way to make my Spring app create a new thread for a new session?
#Controller
#Scope("session")
public class PlayerController {

You are using #Scope annotation the wrong way.
Quoting the docs:
When used as a type-level annotation in conjunction with the Component annotation, indicates the name of a scope to use for instances of the annotated type.
When used as a method-level annotation in conjunction with the Bean annotation, indicates the name of a scope to use for the instance returned from the method.
So you can annotate either a spring component bean or a method that creates a bean if you're using java config. Java config is the only reason it even compiles (it wouldn't in pre 3.0 spring)
In your case that annotation is on a normal bean method where it doesn't mean anything.
Solving the right problem
It looks like you're trying to implement db cache by storing query results in a List<Player> players.
Don't do that. Use one of the prebuilt cache abstractions (spring has a very nice one) instead.
So where should #Scope go?
Annotating #Controller with #Scope("session") won't help as it will create session scoped controllers but the service they have injected is still a singleton.
Annotating only Service bean won't work either, cause #Controller is a singleton and it's dependencies are autowired on application startup.
Annotating both #Service and #Controller might work, but seems a bit heavy handed.
It's better to avoid state at all.

New threads are created for each request.
Your service has an instance variable (players) which is not threadsafe - it is shared by all threads. Any spring bean - including controllers and services are by default a singleton, you need to specify on the service annotation its scope.
#Service("playerService")
#Scope("session")
public class PlayerServiceImpl
But its best(simpler, easier to scale) to keep beans singletons and not rely on instance variables (unless they are also managed by spring/threadsafe/singletons).