I want to programmatically detect whenever someone sends Bitcoin to some address. This happens on a local testnet which I start using this docker-compose.yml file.
Once the local testnet runs, I create a new address using
docker exec -it minimal-crypto-exchange_node_1 bitcoin-cli getnewaddress
Let's say it returns 2N23tWAFEtBtTgxNjBNmnwzsiPdLcNek181.
I put this address into the following Java code:
import org.bitcoinj.core.Address;
import org.bitcoinj.core.Coin;
import org.bitcoinj.core.NetworkParameters;
import org.bitcoinj.core.Transaction;
import org.bitcoinj.wallet.Wallet;
import org.bitcoinj.wallet.listeners.WalletCoinsReceivedEventListener;
public class WalletObserver {
public void init() {
final NetworkParameters netParams = NetworkParameters.fromID(NetworkParameters.ID_REGTEST);
try {
final Wallet wallet = Wallet.createBasic(netParams);
wallet.addWatchedAddress(Address.fromString(netParams, "2N23tWAFEtBtTgxNjBNmnwzsiPdLcNek181"));
wallet.addCoinsReceivedEventListener(new WalletCoinsReceivedEventListener() {
#Override
public void onCoinsReceived(final Wallet wallet, final Transaction transaction, final Coin prevBalance, final Coin newBalance) {
System.out.println("Heyo!");
}
});
}
catch (Exception exception) {
exception.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
Then I start the Java application with this class.
Then I send some test Bitcoin to the address in question:
% docker exec -it minimal-crypto-exchange_node_1 bitcoin-cli sendtoaddress 2N23tWAFEtBtTgxNjBNmnwzsiPdLcNek181 0.5
068c377bab961356ad9a3919229a764aa929711c68aefd5dbd4c7c348eef3406
If I go to http://localhost:3002/tx/068c377bab961356ad9a3919229a764aa929711c68aefd5dbd4c7c348eef3406, I see that the transaction details.
However, the breakpoint in the listener (onCoinsReceived method) never activates.
How do I need to modify my code and/or the commands I use to send test BTC so that whenever money is received by that account, onCoinsReceived method is called? Is there a place where I can tell Wallet or NetworkParameters that I want to connect to localhost?
I am using version 0.15.10 of bitcoinj-core.
Update 1:
I modified docker-compose.yml and added following port mappings:
ports:
- "51001:50001"
- "51002:50002"
- "19001:19001"
- "19000:19000"
- "28332:28332"
Then I rewrote the init method so that I can connect to localhost and specify the port:
public class WalletObserver {
public void init() {
final LocalTestNetParams netParams = new LocalTestNetParams();
netParams.setPort(50001);
try {
final WalletAppKit kit = new WalletAppKit(netParams, new File("."), "_minimalCryptoExchangeBtcWallet");
kit.setAutoSave(true);
kit.connectToLocalHost();
kit.startAsync();
kit.awaitRunning(); // I never get past this point
kit.peerGroup().addPeerDiscovery(new DnsDiscovery(netParams));
kit.wallet().addWatchedAddress(Address.fromString(netParams, "2N23tWAFEtBtTgxNjBNmnwzsiPdLcNek181"));
kit.wallet().addCoinsReceivedEventListener(new WalletCoinsReceivedEventListener() {
#Override
public void onCoinsReceived(final Wallet wallet, final Transaction transaction, final Coin prevBalance, final Coin newBalance) {
System.out.println("Heyo!");
}
});
}
catch (Exception exception) {
exception.printStackTrace();
}
}
LocalTestNetParams allows to specify the port:
package com.dpisarenko.minimalcryptoexchange.logic.btc;
import org.bitcoinj.params.RegTestParams;
public class LocalTestNetParams extends RegTestParams {
public void setPort(final int newPort) {
this.port = newPort;
}
}
I tried all of the aforementioned ports in netParams.setPort(50001);.
In all cases I get the following messages after kit.awaitRunning();:
22:16:34.245 [PeerGroup Thread] INFO org.bitcoinj.core.PeerGroup - Attempting connection to [10.10.1.218]:50001 (0 connected, 1 pending, 1 max)
22:16:34.265 [NioClientManager] WARN org.bitcoinj.net.NioClientManager - Failed to connect with exception: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused
java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused
at java.base/sun.nio.ch.Net.pollConnect(Native Method)
at java.base/sun.nio.ch.Net.pollConnectNow(Net.java:579)
at java.base/sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.finishConnect(SocketChannelImpl.java:820)
at org.bitcoinj.net.NioClientManager.handleKey(NioClientManager.java:64)
at org.bitcoinj.net.NioClientManager.run(NioClientManager.java:122)
at com.google.common.util.concurrent.AbstractExecutionThreadService$1$2.run(AbstractExecutionThreadService.java:66)
at com.google.common.util.concurrent.Callables$4.run(Callables.java:119)
at org.bitcoinj.utils.ContextPropagatingThreadFactory$1.run(ContextPropagatingThreadFactory.java:51)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:830)
22:16:34.267 [NioClientManager] INFO org.bitcoinj.core.PeerGroup - [10.10.1.218]:50001: Peer died (0 connected, 0 pending, 1 max)
22:16:34.267 [PeerGroup Thread] INFO org.bitcoinj.core.PeerGroup - Peer discovery took 21.84 μs and returned 0 items from 0 discoverers
22:16:34.269 [PeerGroup Thread] INFO org.bitcoinj.core.PeerGroup - Waiting 1502 ms before next connect attempt to [10.10.1.218]:50001
22:16:35.776 [PeerGroup Thread] INFO org.bitcoinj.core.PeerGroup - Attempting connection to [10.10.1.218]:50001 (0 connected, 1 pending, 1 max)
22:16:35.778 [NioClientManager] WARN org.bitcoinj.net.NioClientManager - Failed to connect with exception: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused
java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused
at java.base/sun.nio.ch.Net.pollConnect(Native Method)
at java.base/sun.nio.ch.Net.pollConnectNow(Net.java:579)
at java.base/sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.finishConnect(SocketChannelImpl.java:820)
at org.bitcoinj.net.NioClientManager.handleKey(NioClientManager.java:64)
at org.bitcoinj.net.NioClientManager.run(NioClientManager.java:122)
at com.google.common.util.concurrent.AbstractExecutionThreadService$1$2.run(AbstractExecutionThreadService.java:66)
at com.google.common.util.concurrent.Callables$4.run(Callables.java:119)
at org.bitcoinj.utils.ContextPropagatingThreadFactory$1.run(ContextPropagatingThreadFactory.java:51)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:830)
22:16:35.778 [NioClientManager] INFO org.bitcoinj.core.PeerGroup - [10.10.1.218]:50001: Peer died (0 connected, 0 pending, 1 max)
22:16:35.779 [PeerGroup Thread] INFO org.bitcoinj.core.PeerGroup - Peer discovery took 8.752 μs and returned 0 items from 0 discoverers
10.10.1.218 seems to be generated by InetAddress.getLocalHost() in org.bitcoinj.kits.WalletAppKit#connectToLocalHost:
public WalletAppKit connectToLocalHost() {
try {
InetAddress localHost = InetAddress.getLocalHost();
return this.setPeerNodes(new PeerAddress(this.params, localHost, this.params.getPort()));
} catch (UnknownHostException var2) {
throw new RuntimeException(var2);
}
}
Update 1:
I tried to use network_mode: "host".
If I add it to node as in
node:
image: ulamlabs/bitcoind-custom-regtest:latest
network_mode: "host"
I get the following error when I run docker-compose up -d:
minimal-crypto-exchange % docker-compose up -d
Creating network "minimal-crypto-exchange_default" with the default driver
Creating minimal-crypto-exchange_postgres_1 ... done
Creating minimal-crypto-exchange_geth_1 ...
Creating minimal-crypto-exchange_node_1 ... done
Creating minimal-crypto-exchange_electrumx_1 ...
Creating minimal-crypto-exchange_electrumx_1 ... error
ERROR: for minimal-crypto-exchange_electrumx_1 Cannot start service electrumx: driver fail
Creating minimal-crypto-exchange_geth_1 ... done
f68d0f25a0512399877bc55434513def810649e4fcf31a5a88ca3292d34): Error starting userland proxy: listen tcp4 0.0.0.0:28332: bind: address already in use
Creating minimal-crypto-exchange_blockscout_1 ... done
ERROR: for electrumx Cannot start service electrumx: driver failed programming external connectivity on endpoint minimal-crypto-exchange_electrumx_1 (8eaa4f68d0f25a0512399877bc55434513def810649e4fcf31a5a88ca3292d34): Error starting userland proxy: listen tcp4 0.0.0.0:28332: bind: address already in use
ERROR: Encountered errors while bringing up the project.
If I add it to electrumx part as in
electrumx:
image: lukechilds/electrumx:latest
network_mode: "host"
I get another error:
minimal-crypto-exchange % docker-compose up -d
minimal-crypto-exchange_postgres_1 is up-to-date
minimal-crypto-exchange_geth_1 is up-to-date
Recreating minimal-crypto-exchange_node_1 ...
Recreating minimal-crypto-exchange_node_1 ... done
Recreating minimal-crypto-exchange_electrumx_1 ...
ERROR: for minimal-crypto-exchange_electrumx_1 "host" network_mode is incompatible with port_bindings
ERROR: for electrumx "host" network_mode is incompatible with port_bindings
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "docker-compose", line 3, in <module>
File "compose/cli/main.py", line 81, in main
File "compose/cli/main.py", line 203, in perform_command
File "compose/metrics/decorator.py", line 18, in wrapper
File "compose/cli/main.py", line 1186, in up
File "compose/cli/main.py", line 1166, in up
File "compose/project.py", line 697, in up
File "compose/parallel.py", line 108, in parallel_execute
File "compose/parallel.py", line 206, in producer
File "compose/project.py", line 679, in do
File "compose/service.py", line 579, in execute_convergence_plan
File "compose/service.py", line 499, in _execute_convergence_recreate
File "compose/parallel.py", line 108, in parallel_execute
File "compose/parallel.py", line 206, in producer
File "compose/service.py", line 494, in recreate
File "compose/service.py", line 612, in recreate_container
File "compose/service.py", line 330, in create_container
File "compose/service.py", line 939, in _get_container_create_options
File "compose/service.py", line 1014, in _get_container_host_config
File "docker/api/container.py", line 598, in create_host_config
File "docker/types/containers.py", line 338, in __init__
docker.errors.InvalidArgument: "host" network_mode is incompatible with port_bindings
[44262] Failed to execute script docker-compose
Update 2:
If I comment out port bindings as in
electrumx:
image: lukechilds/electrumx:latest
network_mode: host
links:
- node
# Port settings see https://github.com/ulamlabs/bitcoind-custom-regtest
# ports:
# - "51001:50001"
# - "51002:50002"
# - "19001:19001"
# - "19000:19000"
# - "28332:28332"
and run docker-compose up -d I get
% docker-compose up -d
Creating network "minimal-crypto-exchange_default" with the default driver
Creating minimal-crypto-exchange_geth_1 ...
Creating minimal-crypto-exchange_postgres_1 ... done
Creating minimal-crypto-exchange_node_1 ... done
Creating minimal-crypto-exchange_electrumx_1 ... error
Creating minimal-crypto-exchange_geth_1 ... done
ERROR: for minimal-crypto-exchange_electrumx_1 Cannot create container for service electrumx: conflicting options: host type networking can't be used with links. This would result in undefined behavior
Creating minimal-crypto-exchange_blockscout_1 ... done
ERROR: for electrumx Cannot create container for service electrumx: conflicting options: host type networking can't be used with links. This would result in undefined behavior
ERROR: Encountered errors while bringing up the project.
Update 3: I assume that the root of the error is that in my Java code I try to connect to the ElectrumX server instead of the actual Bitcoin node (node in docker-compose.yml).
Update 4:
I changed docker-compose.yml as follows:
node:
image: ulamlabs/bitcoind-custom-regtest:latest
# For ports used by node see
# https://github.com/ulamlabs/bitcoind-custom-regtest/blob/master/bitcoin.conf
ports:
- "19001:19001"
- "19000:19000"
- "28332:28332"
electrumx:
image: lukechilds/electrumx:latest
links:
- node
# Port settings see https://github.com/ulamlabs/bitcoind-custom-regtest
ports:
- "51001:50001"
- "51002:50002"
# - "19001:19001"
# - "19000:19000"
# - "28332:28332"
Now I am getting different errors (full log available here):
11:33:51.865 [NioClientManager] INFO org.bitcoinj.core.PeerGroup - [192.168.10.208]:19000: Peer died (0 connected, 0 pending, 1 max)
11:33:51.865 [NioClientManager] INFO org.bitcoinj.core.PeerGroup - Not yet setting download peer because there is no clear candidate.
11:33:51.865 [NioClientManager] DEBUG org.bitcoinj.core.BitcoinSerializer - Received 168 byte 'alert' message: 60010000000000000000000000ffffff7f00000000ffffff7ffeffff7f01ffffff7f00000000ffffff7f00ffffff7f002f555247454e543a20416c657274206b657920636f6d70726f6d697365642c2075706772616465207265717569726564004630440220653febd6410f470f6bae11cad19c48413becb1ac2c17f908fd0fd53bdc3abd5202206d0e9c96fe88d4a0f01ed9dedae2b6f9e00da94cad0fecaae66ecf689bf71b50
11:33:51.866 [PeerGroup Thread] INFO org.bitcoinj.core.PeerGroup - Waiting 999 ms before next connect attempt to [127.0.0.1]:19000
11:33:51.866 [NioClientManager] DEBUG org.bitcoinj.core.Peer - Received alert from peer Peer{[192.168.10.208]:19000, version=70015, subVer=/Satoshi:0.19.1(bitcore)/, services=1033 (NETWORK, WITNESS, NETWORK_LIMITED), time=2021-11-06 11:33:52, height=5}: URGENT: Alert key compromised, upgrade required
11:33:51.867 [NioClientManager] WARN org.bitcoinj.net.ConnectionHandler - Error handling SelectionKey: java.nio.channels.CancelledKeyException
java.nio.channels.CancelledKeyException: null
at java.base/sun.nio.ch.SelectionKeyImpl.ensureValid(SelectionKeyImpl.java:71)
at java.base/sun.nio.ch.SelectionKeyImpl.readyOps(SelectionKeyImpl.java:130)
at java.base/java.nio.channels.SelectionKey.isWritable(SelectionKey.java:377)
at org.bitcoinj.net.ConnectionHandler.handleKey(ConnectionHandler.java:244)
at org.bitcoinj.net.NioClientManager.handleKey(NioClientManager.java:86)
at org.bitcoinj.net.NioClientManager.run(NioClientManager.java:122)
at com.google.common.util.concurrent.AbstractExecutionThreadService$1$2.run(AbstractExecutionThreadService.java:66)
at com.google.common.util.concurrent.Callables$4.run(Callables.java:119)
at org.bitcoinj.utils.ContextPropagatingThreadFactory$1.run(ContextPropagatingThreadFactory.java:51)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:830)
Update 5:
Someone suggested (in a now removed comment) that in the output of the application there is this Peer does not support bloom filtering message:
11:32:43.482 [NioClientManager] INFO org.bitcoinj.core.Peer - Peer{[127.0.0.1]:19000, version=70015, subVer=/Satoshi:0.19.1(bitcore)/, services=1033 (NETWORK, WITNESS, NETWORK_LIMITED), time=2021-11-06 11:32:43, height=4}: Peer does not support bloom filtering.
So I tried to fork the original image and change the bitcoin.conf file to enable Bloom filtering:
peerbloomfilters=1
When I run docker build -t mentiflectax/bitcoind-custom-regtest:latest . I get the following error message (part of remaining output can be found here):
#13 922.4 g++: fatal error: Killed signal terminated program cc1plus
#13 922.4 compilation terminated.
#13 922.4 make[2]: *** [Makefile:8044: libbitcoin_server_a-init.o] Error 1
#13 922.4 make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
#13 965.8 make[2]: Leaving directory '/bitcoin-0.19.1/src'
#13 965.8 make[1]: *** [Makefile:13765: all-recursive] Error 1
#13 965.9 make[1]: Leaving directory '/bitcoin-0.19.1/src'
#13 965.9 make: *** [Makefile:776: all-recursive] Error 1
------
executor failed running [/bin/sh -c tar -xzf *.tar.gz && cd bitcoin-${BITCOIN_VERSION} && sed -i 's/consensus.nSubsidyHalvingInterval = 150/consensus.nSubsidyHalvingInterval = 210000/g' src/chainparams.cpp && ./autogen.sh && ./configure LDFLAGS=-L`ls -d /opt/db`/lib/ CPPFLAGS=-I`ls -d /opt/db`/include/ --prefix=/opt/bitcoin --disable-man --disable-tests --disable-bench --disable-ccache --with-gui=no --enable-util-cli --with-daemon && make -j4 && make install && strip /opt/bitcoin/bin/bitcoin-cli && strip /opt/bitcoin/bin/bitcoind]: exit code: 2
Update 6: The correct port seems to be 19000.
If I use port 19001, I get following errors after kit.awaitRunning():
INFO org.bitcoinj.core.PeerSocketHandler - [127.0.0.1]:19001: Timed out
Full log output is available here.
I haven't tested your full setup with electrumx and the ethereum stuff present in your docker-compose file, but regarding your problem, the following steps worked properly, and I think it will do as well in your complete setup.
I ran with docker a bitcoin node based in the ulamlabs/bitcoind-custom-regtest:latest image you provided:
docker run -p 18444:19000 -d ulamlabs/bitcoind-custom-regtest:latest
As you can see, I exposed the image internal port 19000 as the default port for RegTestParams, 18444. From the point of view of our client, with this setup, basically it will look like as if we were running the bitcoin daemon in the host. Using your LocalTestNetParams class and providing the port 19000 as you indicated should do the trick as well.
Then, according to the feedback you provided in the question, I manually edited the daemon configuration of the bitcoin node in /root/.bitcoin/bitcoin.conf using bash and vi:
docker exec -it 0aa2e863cd9927 bash
And included the following configuration:
peerbloomfilters=1
After restart the container, I got a new address:
docker exec -it 0aa2e863cd9927 bitcoin-cli -regtest getnewaddress
Let's assume that the new address is the one you provided in the question:
2N23tWAFEtBtTgxNjBNmnwzsiPdLcNek181
Then, as suggested in the Bitcoin documentation, in order to avoid an insufficient funds error, I generated 101 blocks to this address:
docker exec -it 0aa2e863cd9927 bitcoin-cli -regtest generatetoaddress 101 2N23tWAFEtBtTgxNjBNmnwzsiPdLcNek181
I used generatetoaddress and not generate because since Bitcoin 0.19.0 the option is no longer valid.
Next, I prepared a simple Java program, based in the information you provided and this example from the Bitcoinj library documentation:
import java.io.File;
import org.bitcoinj.core.Address;
import org.bitcoinj.core.NetworkParameters;
import org.bitcoinj.kits.WalletAppKit;
import org.bitcoinj.params.RegTestParams;
public class Kit {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Kit kit = new Kit();
kit.run();
}
private synchronized void run(){
NetworkParameters params = RegTestParams.get();
WalletAppKit kit = new WalletAppKit(params, new File("."), "walletappkit-example");
kit.connectToLocalHost();
kit.startAsync();
kit.awaitRunning();
kit.wallet().addWatchedAddress(Address.fromString(params, "2N23tWAFEtBtTgxNjBNmnwzsiPdLcNek181"));
kit.wallet().addCoinsReceivedEventListener((wallet, tx, prevBalance, newBalance) -> {
System.out.println("-----> coins resceived: " + tx.getTxId());
});
while (true) {
try {
this.wait(2000);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
}
I used a simple while loop to keep the problem running; of course, if will be probably unnecessary in an actual setup as it seems you are using Spring Boot.
Then, if you send some bitcoins to this address:
docker exec -it 0aa2e863cd9927 bitcoin-cli -regtest sendtoaddress 2N23tWAFEtBtTgxNjBNmnwzsiPdLcNek181 0.00001
0f972642713c72ae0fe03fe51818b9ea4d483720b69b90e795f35eb80a587c26
The listener should be invoked:
2021-11-09 23:51:20.537 INFO [NioClientManager][Wallet] Received a pending transaction 0f972642713c72ae0fe03fe51818b9ea4d483720b69b90e795f35eb80a587c26 that spends 0.00 BTC from our own wallet, and sends us 0.00001 BTC
2021-11-09 23:51:20.537 INFO [NioClientManager][Wallet] commitTx of 0f972642713c72ae0fe03fe51818b9ea4d483720b69b90e795f35eb80a587c26
...
2021-11-09 23:51:20.537 INFO [NioClientManager][Wallet] ->pending: 0f972642713c72ae0fe03fe51818b9ea4d483720b69b90e795f35eb80a587c26
2021-11-09 23:51:20.537 INFO [NioClientManager][Wallet] Estimated balance is now: 0.00001 BTC
-----> coins resceived: 0f972642713c72ae0fe03fe51818b9ea4d483720b69b90e795f35eb80a587c26
2021-11-09 23:51:20.538 INFO [NioClientManager][WalletFiles] Saving wallet; last seen block is height 165, date 2021-11-09T22:50:48Z, hash 23451521947bc5ff098c088ae0fc445becca8837d39ee8f6dd88f2c47ad5ac23
2021-11-09 23:51:20.543 INFO [NioClientManager][WalletFiles] Save completed in 4.736 ms
There is still a problem you mentioned that I haven't had the opportunity to test, and it is creating a new Docker image in which the peerbloomfilters configuration would be configured properly without modifying the actual container state. I think the compilation problem you indicated could be related to this issue, basically, that the container didn't have enough resources to perform the process. If you are using macOS and Docker for Mac, try tweaking the amount of memory available to your containers, it may be of help. A change in the base alpine image used can motivate the problem also. I will try digging into the issue as well.
I'm unable to attach a #SqsListener in a spring boot application. It throws AWS.SimpleQueueService.NonExistentQueue exception.
I've gone through the question: Specified queue does not exist
and as far as I know, all the configurations are correct.
#Component
public class SQSListenerImpl{
#SqsListener(value = Constants.SQS_REQUEST_QUEUE, deletionPolicy = SqsMessageDeletionPolicy.NEVER)
public void listen(String taskJson, Acknowledgment acknowledgment, #Headers Map<String, String> headers) throws ExecutionException, InterruptedException {
//stuff
}
#PostConstruct
private void init(){
final AmazonSQS sqs = AmazonSQSClientBuilder.defaultClient();
LOGGER.info("Listing all queues in your account.\n");
for (final String queueUrl : sqs.listQueues().getQueueUrls()) {
LOGGER.info(" QueueUrl: " + queueUrl);
}
}
}
application.properties
cloud.aws.stack.auto=false
cloud.aws.region.static=ap-southeast-1
logging.level.root=INFO
Logs from above code:
[requestId: MainThread] [INFO] [SQSListenerImpl] [main] QueueUrl: https://sqs.ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com/xxxxx/hello-world
[requestId: MainThread] [INFO] [SQSListenerImpl] [main] QueueUrl: https://sqs.ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com/xxxxx/some-name2
[requestId: MainThread] [INFO] [SQSListenerImpl] [main] QueueUrl: https://sqs.ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com/xxxxx/some-name3
[requestId: MainThread] [WARN] [SimpleMessageListenerContainer] [main] Ignoring queue with name 'hello-world': The queue does not exist.; nested exception is com.amazonaws.services.sqs.model.QueueDoesNotExistException: The specified queue does not exist for this wsdl version. (Service: AmazonSQS; Status Code: 400; Error Code: AWS.SimpleQueueService.NonExistentQueue; Request ID: 3c0108aa-7611-528f-ac69-5eb01fasb9f3)
[requestId: MainThread] [INFO] [Http11NioProtocol] [main] Starting ProtocolHandler ["http-nio-8080"]
[requestId: MainThread] [INFO] [TomcatWebServer] [main] Tomcat started on port(s): 8080 (http) with context path ''
[requestId: MainThread] [INFO] [Startup] [main] Started Startup in 11.391 seconds (JVM running for 12.426)
Aws credentials used are under ~/.aws/ directory.
Now my question is, if sqs.listQueues() can see the queue then why can't #SqsListener? Am I missing something or doing something wrong?
I tried with SpringBoot Aws clound like you and got same error.
Then i used the full http url as queue name and got access denied error
#SqsListener(value = "https://sqs.ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com/xxxxx/hello-world")
So in the end, i end up using AWS SDK directly to get message from SQS
Here's what I'm doing with Spring Cloud.
Using SPEL I'm attaching a value from my application.properties to the Annotation #SqsListener like this
#SqsListener(value = "#{queueConfiguration.getQueue()}", deletionPolicy = SqsMessageDeletionPolicy.ON_SUCCESS)
One thing to note, make sure you use the full HTTPS path for the queue.
For all local development, I'm using "localstack" and using a local implementation of SQS but the same code applies as it gets deploy in ECS. The other piece to note is that the role or instance needs to be able to Receive Messages via IAM to make this happen.
Using full URL worked for me.
#SqsListener("https://sqs.ap-south-1.amazonaws.com/xxxxxxxxx/queue-name")
Using below code work for me
#SqsListener(value="https://sqs.us-west-1.amazonaws.com/xxxxx/queue-name")
In my application Java spark context is created with an unavailable master URL (you may assume master is down for a maintenance). When creating Java spark context it leads to stopping JVM that runs spark driver with JVM exit code 50.
When I checked the logs I found SparkUncaughtExceptionHandler calling the System.exit. My program should run forever. How should I overcome this issue ?
I tried this scenario in spark version 1.4.1 and 1.6.0
My code is given below
package test.mains;
import org.apache.spark.SparkConf;
import org.apache.spark.api.java.JavaSparkContext;
public class CheckJavaSparkContext {
/**
* #param args the command line arguments
*/
public static void main(String[] args) {
SparkConf conf = new SparkConf();
conf.setAppName("test");
conf.setMaster("spark://sunshine:7077");
try {
new JavaSparkContext(conf);
} catch (Throwable e) {
System.out.println("Caught an exception : " + e.getMessage());
//e.printStackTrace();
}
System.out.println("Waiting to complete...");
while (true) {
}
}
}
Part of the output log
16/03/04 18:02:24 INFO SparkDeploySchedulerBackend: Shutting down all executors
16/03/04 18:02:24 INFO SparkDeploySchedulerBackend: Asking each executor to shut down
16/03/04 18:02:24 WARN AppClient$ClientEndpoint: Drop UnregisterApplication(null) because has not yet connected to master
16/03/04 18:02:24 ERROR SparkUncaughtExceptionHandler: Uncaught exception in thread Thread[appclient-registration-retry-thread,5,main]
java.lang.InterruptedException
at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.doAcquireSharedNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1039)
at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.tryAcquireSharedNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1328)
at scala.concurrent.impl.Promise$DefaultPromise.tryAwait(Promise.scala:208)
at scala.concurrent.impl.Promise$DefaultPromise.ready(Promise.scala:218)
at scala.concurrent.impl.Promise$DefaultPromise.result(Promise.scala:223)
at scala.concurrent.Await$$anonfun$result$1.apply(package.scala:107)
at scala.concurrent.BlockContext$DefaultBlockContext$.blockOn(BlockContext.scala:53)
at scala.concurrent.Await$.result(package.scala:107)
at org.apache.spark.rpc.RpcTimeout.awaitResult(RpcTimeout.scala:75)
at org.apache.spark.deploy.client.AppClient.stop(AppClient.scala:290)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.cluster.SparkDeploySchedulerBackend.org$apache$spark$scheduler$cluster$SparkDeploySchedulerBackend$$stop(SparkDeploySchedulerBackend.scala:198)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.cluster.SparkDeploySchedulerBackend.stop(SparkDeploySchedulerBackend.scala:101)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.TaskSchedulerImpl.stop(TaskSchedulerImpl.scala:446)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.DAGScheduler.stop(DAGScheduler.scala:1582)
at org.apache.spark.SparkContext$$anonfun$stop$7.apply$mcV$sp(SparkContext.scala:1731)
at org.apache.spark.util.Utils$.tryLogNonFatalError(Utils.scala:1229)
at org.apache.spark.SparkContext.stop(SparkContext.scala:1730)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.cluster.SparkDeploySchedulerBackend.dead(SparkDeploySchedulerBackend.scala:127)
at org.apache.spark.deploy.client.AppClient$ClientEndpoint.markDead(AppClient.scala:264)
at org.apache.spark.deploy.client.AppClient$ClientEndpoint$$anon$2$$anonfun$run$1.apply$mcV$sp(AppClient.scala:134)
at org.apache.spark.util.Utils$.tryOrExit(Utils.scala:1163)
at org.apache.spark.deploy.client.AppClient$ClientEndpoint$$anon$2.run(AppClient.scala:129)
at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:308)
at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$301(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:294)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
16/03/04 18:02:24 INFO DiskBlockManager: Shutdown hook called
16/03/04 18:02:24 INFO ShutdownHookManager: Shutdown hook called
16/03/04 18:02:24 INFO ShutdownHookManager: Deleting directory /tmp/spark-ea68a0fa-4f0d-4dbb-8407-cce90ef78a52
16/03/04 18:02:24 INFO ShutdownHookManager: Deleting directory /tmp/spark-ea68a0fa-4f0d-4dbb-8407-cce90ef78a52/userFiles-db548748-a55c-4406-adcb-c09e63b118bd
Java Result: 50
If application master is down application by itself will try to connect to the master three times with 20 second timeout. It looks like these parameters are hardcoded and not configurable. If application fails to connect there is nothing more you can do than to try to resubmit your application once it is up again.
That is why you should configure your cluster in a high availability mode. Spark Standalone supports two different modes:
Single-Node Recovery with Local File System
Standby Masters with ZooKeeper
where the second option should be applicable in production and useful in the described scenario.
I have installed Hadoop 2.3.0 in windows and able to execute MR jobs successfully. But when I trying to execute MR jobs in normal privilege (without admin privilege) means job get fails with following exception. Here I tried with Pig Script sample.
2014-10-15 12:02:32,822 WARN [main] org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation: PriviledgedActionException as:kaveen (auth:SIMPLE) cause:java.io.IOException: Split class org.apache.pig.backend.hadoop.executionengine.mapReduceLayer.PigSplit not found
2014-10-15 12:02:32,823 WARN [main] org.apache.hadoop.mapred.YarnChild: Exception running child : java.io.IOException: Split class org.apache.pig.backend.hadoop.executionengine.mapReduceLayer.PigSplit not found
at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.getSplitDetails(MapTask.java:362)
at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.runOldMapper(MapTask.java:403)
at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:342)
at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.YarnChild$2.run(YarnChild.java:168)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:415)
at org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation.doAs(UserGroupInformation.java:1548)
at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.YarnChild.main(YarnChild.java:163)
Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: Class org.apache.pig.backend.hadoop.executionengine.mapReduceLayer.PigSplit not found
at org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.getClassByName(Configuration.java:1794)
at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.getSplitDetails(MapTask.java:360)
... 7 more
2014-10-15 12:02:32,827 INFO [main] org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Task: Runnning cleanup for the task
2014-10-15 12:02:32,827 WARN [main] org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.lib.output.FileOutputCommitter: Output Path is null in abortTask()
Update:
I was able to drill down the problem and found that the exception raised in the following line at method "MapTask.getSplitDetails(MapTask.java:363)".
private <T> T getSplitDetails(Path file, long offset)
throws IOException {
FileSystem fs = file.getFileSystem(conf);
FSDataInputStream inFile = fs.open(file);
inFile.seek(offset);
String className = StringInterner.weakIntern(Text.readString(inFile));
Class<T> cls;
try {
cls = (Class<T>) conf.getClassByName(className);
} catch (ClassNotFoundException ce) {
IOException wrap = new IOException("Split class " + className +
" not found");
wrap.initCause(ce);
throw wrap;
}
But If I start "NodeManager" with admin privilege mean the above exception won't occur. I don't know why MR job not working when I start "NodeManager" with normal privilege.
If anyone know the reason and solution for above problem. Please guide me as soon as possible.
You can change the location of tmp directory location for hadoop using the below property
<property>
<name>hadoop.tmp.dir</name>
<value>/other/tmp</value>
</property>
Your default tmp location is c:\tmp which requires admin privilege to access. Change the location into any sub directory and try MR job without admin privilege.
Hope it helps.
I have a problem using java rmi:
When I'm trying to run my server, I get a connectException (see below).
Exception happens when executing the rebind method:
Runtime.getRuntime().exec("rmiregistry 2020");
MyServer server = new MyServer();
Naming.rebind("//localhost:2020/RemoteDataPointHandler", server);
when using rmi://localhost:2020/RemoteDataPointHandler instead, it doesn't work either. Also using the default port does not work. I also tried using the 127.0.0.1 ip-address, but with the same effect.
my runtime args:
-Djava.security.policy=java.security.AllPermission
Exception in thread "main" java.rmi.ConnectException: Connection refused to host: localhost; nested exception is:
java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused
at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPEndpoint.newSocket(TCPEndpoint.java:574)
at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPChannel.createConnection(TCPChannel.java:185)
at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPChannel.newConnection(TCPChannel.java:171)
at sun.rmi.server.UnicastRef.newCall(UnicastRef.java:306)
at sun.rmi.registry.RegistryImpl_Stub.rebind(Unknown Source)
at java.rmi.Naming.rebind(Naming.java:160)
at be.fortega.knx.server.Main.(Main.java:25)
at be.fortega.knx.server.Main.main(Main.java:16)
Caused by: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused
at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketConnect(Native Method)
at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.doConnect(PlainSocketImpl.java:333)
at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.connectToAddress(PlainSocketImpl.java:195)
at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.connect(PlainSocketImpl.java:182)
at java.net.SocksSocketImpl.connect(SocksSocketImpl.java:433)
at java.net.Socket.connect(Socket.java:524)
at java.net.Socket.connect(Socket.java:474)
at java.net.Socket.(Socket.java:371)
at java.net.Socket.(Socket.java:184)
at sun.rmi.transport.proxy.RMIDirectSocketFactory.createSocket(RMIDirectSocketFactory.java:22)
at sun.rmi.transport.proxy.RMIMasterSocketFactory.createSocket(RMIMasterSocketFactory.java:128)
at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPEndpoint.newSocket(TCPEndpoint.java:569)
... 7 more
had a simliar problem with that connection exception. it is thrown either when the registry is not started yet (like in your case) or when the registry is already unexported (like in my case).
but a short comment to the difference between the 2 ways to start the registry:
Runtime.getRuntime().exec("rmiregistry 2020");
runs the rmiregistry.exe in javas bin-directory in a new process and continues parallel with your java code.
LocateRegistry.createRegistry(2020);
the rmi method call starts the registry, returns the reference to that registry remote object and then continues with the next statement.
in your case the registry is not started in time when you try to bind your object
It seems to work when I replace the
Runtime.getRuntime().exec("rmiregistry 2020");
by
LocateRegistry.createRegistry(2020);
anyone an idea why? What's the difference?
You need to have a rmiregistry running before attempting to connect (register) a RMI service with it.
The LocateRegistry.createRegistry(2020) method call creates and exports a registry on the specified port number.
See the documentation for LocateRegistry
One difference we can note in Windows is:
If you use Runtime.getRuntime().exec("rmiregistry 1024");
you can see rmiregistry.exe process will run in your Task Manager
whereas if you use Registry registry = LocateRegistry.createRegistry(1024);
you can not see the process running in Task Manager,
I think Java handles it in a different way.
and this is my server.policy file
Before running the the application, make sure that you killed all your existing
javaw.exe and rmiregistry.exe corresponds to your rmi programs which are
already running.
The following code works for me by using Registry.LocateRegistry() or
Runtime.getRuntime.exec("");
// Standard extensions get all permissions by default
grant {
permission java.security.AllPermission;
};
VM argument
-Djava.rmi.server.codebase=file:\C:\Users\Durai\workspace\RMI2\src\
Code:
package server;
import java.rmi.Naming;
import java.rmi.RMISecurityManager;
import java.rmi.Remote;
import java.rmi.registry.LocateRegistry;
import java.rmi.registry.Registry;
public class HelloServer
{
public static void main (String[] argv)
{
try {
if(System.getSecurityManager()==null){
System.setProperty("java.security.policy","C:\\Users\\Durai\\workspace\\RMI\\src\\server\\server.policy");
System.setSecurityManager(new RMISecurityManager());
}
Runtime.getRuntime().exec("rmiregistry 1024");
// Registry registry = LocateRegistry.createRegistry(1024);
// registry.rebind ("Hello", new Hello ("Hello,From Roseindia.net pvt ltd!"));
//Process process = Runtime.getRuntime().exec("C:\\Users\\Durai\\workspace\\RMI\\src\\server\\rmi_registry_start.bat");
Naming.rebind ("//localhost:1024/Hello",new Hello ("Hello,From Roseindia.net pvt ltd!"));
System.out.println ("Server is connected and ready for operation.");
}
catch (Exception e) {
System.out.println ("Server not connected: " + e);
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
it seems that you should set your command as an String[],for example:
String[] command = new String[]{"rmiregistry","2020"};
Runtime.getRuntime().exec(command);
it just like the style of main(String[] args).