We Keep Coding

Receiving UnreachablePortException at Apache Mina while sending via udp

I am using Mina V2.1.3 for a network application; especially I have a udp session problem: I want to publish messages to specific "ips" and "ports" of some receivers via Udp. But I don't know (and I dont care) if such receivers are really listening to their ports and really received the packages.
In case that no receiver is listening to its port, Mina will receive an ICMP-Package back, which means, that the port is unreachable. Mina caughts this Package and throws an UnreachablePortException. Then Mina closes the session object and stops sending. My aim is to ignore the "destination unreachable" packages and therefore i want to still send udp packages ("fire-and-forget principle").
Here is my approach (some kind of pseudo code):
NioDatagramConnector connector = new NioDatagramConnector();
((DatagramSessionConfig) connector.getSessionConfig()).setCloseOnPortUnreachable(false);
connector.getStatistics().setThroughputCalculationInterval(1);
connector.getFilterChain().addLast("logger", new LoggingFilter());
DefaultIoFilterChainBuilder filterChainBuilder = connector.getFilterChain();
filterChainBuilder.addFilter(...);
connector.setHandler(this);
for (UDPClient client : udpClients) {
((NioDatagramConnector)connector).connect(new InetSocketAddress(client.getIP(), client.getPort()));
}
//Sending data
while(true) {
connector.broadcast("Message");
Thread.sleep(10);
}
public void sessionClosed(IoSession session) throws Exception {
System.out.println("Called after ICMP package is received");
}
//Further methods which are based of IoHandler
Based on debugging, I can see that Mina will remove this session and finally calls the closeSession()-method (given from IoHandler).

As discussed in the bug report https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1137
A UDP server socket needs to be open on the remote device at the remote port otherwise you will get UnreachablePortException. This exception is not done by MINA or JAVA but rather POSIX and is universal.

Hazelcast - Client mode - How to recover after cluster failure?

We are using hazelcast distributed lock and cache functions in our products. Usage of distributed locking is vitally important for our business logic.
Currently we are using the embedded mode(each application node is also a hazelcast cluster member). We are going to switch to client - server mode.
The problem we have noticed for client - server is that, once the cluster is down for a period, after several attempts clients are destroyed and any objects (maps, sets, etc.) that were retrieved from that client are no longer usable.
Also the client instance does not recover even after the Hazelcast cluster comes back up (we receive HazelcastInstanceNotActiveException )
I know that this issue has been addressed several times and ended up as being a feature request:
issue1
issue2
issue3
My question : What should be the strategy to recover the client? Currently we are planning to enqueue a task in the client process as below. Based on a condition it will try to restart the client instance...
We will check whether the client is running or not via clientInstance.getLifecycleService().isRunning() check.
Here is the task code:
private class ClientModeHazelcastInstanceReconnectorTask implements Runnable {
#Override
public void run() {
try {
HazelCastService hazelcastService = HazelCastService.getInstance();
HazelcastInstance clientInstance = hazelcastService.getHazelcastInstance();
boolean running = clientInstance.getLifecycleService().isRunning();
if (!running) {
logger.info("Current clientInstance is NOT running. Trying to start hazelcastInstance from ClientModeHazelcastInstanceReconnectorTask...");
hazelcastService.startHazelcastInstance(HazelcastOperationMode.CLIENT);
}
} catch (Exception ex) {
logger.error("Error occured in ClientModeHazelcastInstanceReconnectorTask !!!", ex);
}
}
}
Is this approach suitable? I also tried to listen LifeCycle events but could not make it work via events.
Regards

In Hazelcast 3.9 we changed the way connection and reconnection works in clients. You can read about the new behavior in the docs: http://docs.hazelcast.org/docs/3.9.1/manual/html-single/index.html#configuring-client-connection-strategy
I hope this helps.

In Hazelcast 3.10 you may increase connection attempt limit from 2 (by default) to maximum:
ClientConfig clientConfig = new ClientConfig();
clientConfig.getNetworkConfig().setConnectionAttemptLimit(Integer.MAX_VALUE);

NettyIO disconnect Client from Server

How can I disconnect a netty client from the server so it executes the handerRemoved method on the server side and completely stops running? I tried using group.shutDownGraceFully() but the client still keeps connected to the server. Is there any method I am missing?
I also noticed when I try to connect to the server and it is not reachable (connection refused), the next time I connect to a real server it connects but it does not send or get any more messages.

you seem to be new to network programming in general.
I am new to netty so please don't take anything I say as 100% true and especially not anywhere near 100% efficient.
so one major basic fact of network programming is that the the client and server are not directly linked (obviously). In order to execute a method on the server, you will need to send a message from the client to the server. for instance:
what you have on Client:
//on shutdown
{
workerGroup.shutdownGracefully();
bossGroup.shutdownGracefully();
}
what you want:
{
yourchannelname.writeAndFlush("bye"+"\r\n")
workerGroup.shutdownGracefully();
bossGroup.shutdownGracefully();
}
and when the server receives the bye command:
// If user typed the 'bye' command, wait until the server closes
// the connection.
if ("bye".equals(line.toLowerCase())) {
ch.closeFuture().sync();
break;
}
}
//this is for safety reasons, it is optional-ish
// Wait until all messages are flushed before closing the channel.
if (lastWriteFuture != null) {
lastWriteFuture.sync();
}
//what you already have
} finally {
// The connection is closed automatically on shutdown.
group.shutdownGracefully();
}
}
hope this helped, iv never answered a question on stack overflow before so I hope I at least sound like I know what im doing :P

Chat server - options for implementing

I'm trying to develop a Java chat server. I don't know if the better solution is to do either of:
Create a socket for each client and keep it open
Set an interval in the client application and query a database to check if there are messages for the client.
Which is the best way to go for this situation?

i suggest you to learn Serialization if you want to develop an application with UI support. Moreover, you have to create a socket for each client especially in Server side. And a Server should have threads which maybe you can call client handler, to deal with clients' requests. Query a database for checking received messages is meaningless but you can save all messages in a database maybe. My advice is if you are going to use a database (well i suggest that), use it for dealing with registration process of clients. So whenever a client sends a request to server for logging in, a thread will check will check if that client has already have an account or not in database.If not you can implement a simple register form. And logically every client will have a friend list which you should keep them in a database.
EDIT: The Server will look like this.
public class Server {
public static void main(String[] args) {
try {
ServerSocket s = new ServerSocket(8087);
System.out.println("Server Started");
while (true) {
Socket incoming = s.accept();
System.out.println(incoming.getInetAddress().getHostAddress() + " was connected!");
new ClientHandler2(incoming).start();
}
} catch (Exception e) {}
}
}
So the main point is Server should never stop to listen the specified port.
Client Handler which is a thread created in Server side.
public class ClientHandler extends Thread {
private Socket incoming;
public ClientHandler(Socket incoming){
this.incoming = incoming;
}
#Override
public void run(){}
Server will send the initialized socket into the ClientHandler's constructor and call start() method to run it.

Actually you do not have to keep connection for eternity for each client ! All you have to do is store client's state server side and then communicate via any connection. Then you can get back resource and use them more wisely when your client doesn't seem to be active for a while.

Client-Server communication where Server initiates

I would like to have this setup:
Server hosting TCP socket server
Multiple clients connected over TCP (keeping connection open)
Then I would like to initiate a message from the Server to the client. I can't figure out how to do this, and have multiple client sessions at the same time. Techniques I've read involve the Server listening on a port, and when it receives communicate from a client, it launches a new thread to handle and process that, and then it goes back to listening on the port for the next request of another client.
So, then how would I tap into that and send a message to a client running on one of those threads?
My actual usage scenario if you are interested is below. Final goal is like a remote control for your file system to upload files to the server.
- Each client has a java background application running in the system tray that connects to the server
- Server hosts connections, and also hosts a RESTFul webservice to initiate communication
- Mobile device connects to Server over RESTFul webservices to request informatino about the client's filesystem. So it can drill down and find a file, then click and have the file uploaded to the server.
The idea here is mobile users needing to upload files from their desktop to the server while away from their office on a mobile device. (and this is for custom product, so can't use a third-party app_
PS: I've been looking at the simple Client-Server chat program here: http://way2java.com/networking/chat-program-two-way-communication/

You want to have a server listening at all times on a specified port. Once the server notices an incoming connection on that port you should create a new Thread to handle the communication between that client and the server, while the main thread keeps on listening for other incoming connections. This way you can have multiple clients connected to one server. Like so:
private void listen() throws IOException {
serverSocket = new ServerSocket(port)
while (GlobalFlags.listening) {
new ServerThread(serverSocket.accept();
if (GlobalFlags.exit) {
serverSocket.close();
break;
}
}
}
Where the GlobalFlags are variables to control the listening process and are not really necessary. You could do a while True and just keep listening for ever and ever.
In my project I have a main server controller which had listeners running in Threads. The controller controlled the GlobalFlags. I'm sure instead of using global flags there is a better way to do inter thread communication but for me this was the simplest at the time.
The ServerThread should be looping all the time switching between sending output to the client and receiving input from the client. Like so:
ServerThread(Socket socket) {
super("GameServerThread");
this.socket = socket;
try {
this.socket.setTcpNoDelay(true);
} catch (SocketException e) {
// Error handling
}
this.terminate = false;
}
#Override
public void run() {
try {
out = new PrintWriter(socket.getOutputStream(), true);
in = new BufferedReader(
new InputStreamReader(
socket.getInputStream()));
String inputLine, outputLine;
while ((inputLine = in.readLine()) != null) {
outputLine = processInput(inputLine);
out.println(outputLine);
if (terminate) {
break;
}
}
}
out.close();
in.close();
socket.close();
} catch (Exception e) {
// Error handling, should not use Exception but handle all exceptions by themselves.
}
On the client side you have a thread running through a similar loop, receiving input from the server and then sending output to the server.
In this example processInput is the function used to process the client's input. If you want the server to initiate contact you can make the server send something to the outputstream before listening for input and make the client listen first.
I have extracted this example from one of my own projects and the this.socket.setTcpNoDelay(true) is supposed to make the process faster. Reference here: http://www.rgagnon.com/javadetails/java-0294.html
"java.net.Socket.setTcpNoDelay() is used to enable/disable TCP_NODELAY which disable/enable Nagle's algorithm.
Nagle's algorithm try to conserve bandwidth by minimizing the number of segments that are sent. When applications wish to decrease network latency and increase performance, they can disable Nagle's algorithm (that is enable TCP_NODELAY). Data will be sent earlier, at the cost of an increase in bandwidth consumption. The Nagle's algorithm is described in RFC 896.
You get the current "TCP_NODELAY" setting with java.net.Socket.getTcpNoDelay()"
So to send a message to a specific client you could put all the threads upon creation in an ArrayList so you can keep track of all the currently connected clients. You can have the processInput method halt and polling a queue/variable until another class puts the message to be send in the queue/variable. So how to gain a handle on the class depends on your implementation of processInput. You could give every thread an ID (which is what I did in my project) and maybe have the processInput method poll an ArrayList at index=ID. Then to send output to the client you would have to set the variable at index=ID.
This method seems kind of clunky to me personally but I'm not really sure how else I would do it. You would probably use Queues and have processInput write the input to its Queue and then wait for another class to read it and put its response in the Queue. But I have personally never worked with Queues in java so you should read up on that yourself.

In my knowledge
1) Server hosting TCP socket server -- Possible
2) Multiple clients connected over TCP -- Possible
3) Then I would like to initiate a message from the Server to the client -- Not Possible. The Client has to initiate a connection creation, then the server might be able to send data packets to You. Example: You need to open Facebook website on your browser, Facebook server cannot decide to send its page to your PC on its own because your PC will not have a static IP address, and also if Facebook hypothetically writes code to initiate connection to Your PC, then it is as good as Your PC is the server and Facebook website/server acts as client.