Jackson annotations are for serialization but I cannot find the solution to have two different views with different behavior. Having the following json:
{
"username": "username",
"manager": null,
"password": "pwd"
}
I'd like to have to following output in case the first view (public: no null and no sensitive information):
{
"username": "username"
}
For the second view (internal: incoming nulls are showed sensitive information is hashed):
{
"username": "username",
"manager": null,
"password": "hashedValue"
}
The problem is when the optional fields are not provided like in the following json:
{
"password": "pwd"
}
I'd like to have an empty for public and only the hashed password in the internal view:
{
"password": "hashedValue"
}
I have the following class:
#JsonInclude(JsonInclude.Include.NON_NULL)
public class Test {
private String username;
private String manager;
private String password;
#JsonView(Views.Internal.class)
#JsonSerialize(using = Md5Serializer.class)
public String getPassword() {
return password;
}
public void setPassword(String password) {
this.password = password;
}
public String getUsername() {
return username;
}
public void setUsername(String username) {
this.username = username;
}
public String getManager() {
return manager;
}
public void setManager(String manager) {
this.manager = manager;
}
}
This can do most what I'd like to have but it cannot make difference if a value is null because of the default value or because it's coming from the JSON.
An other approach was to use a Map inside the object:
#JsonInclude(JsonInclude.Include.NON_NULL)
public class Test {
private Map<String, String> content = new HashMap<>();
#JsonView(Views.Internal.class)
#JsonSerialize(using = Md5Serializer.class)
#JsonIgnore
public String getPassword() {
return this.content.get("password");
}
#JsonSetter
public void setPassword(String password) {
this.content.put("password", password);
}
#JsonIgnore
public String getUsername() {
return this.content.get("username");
}
#JsonSetter
public void setUsername(String username) {
this.content.put("username", username);
}
#JsonIgnore
public String getManager() {
return this.content.get("manager");
}
#JsonSetter
public void setManager(String manager) {
this.content.put("manager", manager);
}
#JsonAnyGetter
public Map<String, String> getContent() {
return this.content;
}
}
In this case the problem that the password is not hashed (and the hashed value cannot be stored here).
If the getters are used and the JsonAnyGetter is removed then the incoming null cannot be serialized as the JsonInclude ignores the field. I was reading a lot that a BeanSerializerModifier can be used but that is also needed to be register in all ObjectMapper instance.
Also I'm not sure that without setting the view I'd like to have only the Public view but currently all non-null values are shown. Any idea how it can be achieved only by annotations?
Related
Hi i want to convert this json to json object in java so that i can pass it to http request to call an api
{
"aliasNaming": true,
"dataServiceType": "BROWSE",
"deviceName": "MyDevice",
"langPref": " ",
"maxPageSize": "2000",
"outputType": "VERSION1",
"password": "!jshjhsdhshdj",
"query": {
"autoClear": true,
"autoFind": true,
"condition": [
{
"controlId": "F4211.CO",
"operator": "EQUAL",
"value": [
{
"content": "00098",
"specialValueId": "LITERAL"
}
]
},
{
"controlId": "F4211.DCTO",
"operator": "EQUAL",
"value": [
{
"content": "SM",
"specialValueId": "LITERAL"
}
]
},
{
"controlId": "F4211.UPMJ",
"operator": "GREATER_EQUAL",
"value": [
{
"content": "01/01/17",
"specialValueId": "LITERAL"
}
]
}
],
"matchType": "MATCH_ALL"
},
"returnControlIDs": "F4211.DOCO|F4211.TRDJ|F4211.CRCD|F4211.AN8|F4211.DSC2|F4211.DSC1|F4211.LITM|F4211.LOTN|F4211.UORG|F4211.UPRC|F4211.AEXP",
"targetName": "F4211",
"targetType": "table",
"token": "044biPNadxNVGhyAKdrImoniK98OOa2l86ZA63qCr4gE5o=MDIwMDA4LTIyNDU5MjUxMTY2MzY3NTA3MTRNeURldmljZTE1Mzc0MjYwMjAyNTk=",
"username": "Ali"
}
i have created 4 models using http://www.jsonschema2pojo.org.
those models just have getter setter in it. look something like this
#JsonProperty("aliasNaming")
private Boolean aliasNaming;
#JsonProperty("dataServiceType")
private String dataServiceType;
#JsonProperty("deviceName")
private String deviceName;
#JsonProperty("langPref")
private String langPref;
#JsonProperty("maxPageSize")
private String maxPageSize;
#JsonProperty("outputType")
private String outputType;
#JsonProperty("password")
private String password;
#JsonProperty("query")
private Query query;
#JsonProperty("returnControlIDs")
private String returnControlIDs;
#JsonProperty("targetName")
private String targetName;
#JsonProperty("targetType")
private String targetType;
#JsonProperty("token")
private String token;
#JsonProperty("username")
private String username;
#JsonIgnore
private Map<String, Object> additionalProperties = new HashMap<String, Object>();
#JsonProperty("aliasNaming")
public Boolean getAliasNaming() {
return aliasNaming;
}
#JsonProperty("aliasNaming")
public void setAliasNaming(Boolean aliasNaming) {
this.aliasNaming = aliasNaming;
}
#JsonProperty("dataServiceType")
public String getDataServiceType() {
return dataServiceType;
}
#JsonProperty("dataServiceType")
public void setDataServiceType(String dataServiceType) {
this.dataServiceType = dataServiceType;
}
#JsonProperty("deviceName")
public String getDeviceName() {
return deviceName;
}
#JsonProperty("deviceName")
public void setDeviceName(String deviceName) {
this.deviceName = deviceName;
}
#JsonProperty("langPref")
public String getLangPref() {
return langPref;
}
#JsonProperty("langPref")
public void setLangPref(String langPref) {
this.langPref = langPref;
}
#JsonProperty("maxPageSize")
public String getMaxPageSize() {
return maxPageSize;
}
#JsonProperty("maxPageSize")
public void setMaxPageSize(String maxPageSize) {
this.maxPageSize = maxPageSize;
}
#JsonProperty("outputType")
public String getOutputType() {
return outputType;
}
#JsonProperty("outputType")
public void setOutputType(String outputType) {
this.outputType = outputType;
}
#JsonProperty("password")
public String getPassword() {
return password;
}
#JsonProperty("password")
public void setPassword(String password) {
this.password = password;
}
#JsonProperty("query")
public Query getQuery() {
return query;
}
#JsonProperty("query")
public void setQuery(Query query) {
this.query = query;
}
#JsonProperty("returnControlIDs")
public String getReturnControlIDs() {
return returnControlIDs;
}
#JsonProperty("returnControlIDs")
public void setReturnControlIDs(String returnControlIDs) {
this.returnControlIDs = returnControlIDs;
}
#JsonProperty("targetName")
public String getTargetName() {
return targetName;
}
#JsonProperty("targetName")
public void setTargetName(String targetName) {
this.targetName = targetName;
}
#JsonProperty("targetType")
public String getTargetType() {
return targetType;
}
#JsonProperty("targetType")
public void setTargetType(String targetType) {
this.targetType = targetType;
}
#JsonProperty("token")
public String getToken() {
return token;
}
#JsonProperty("token")
public void setToken(String token) {
this.token = token;
}
#JsonProperty("username")
public String getUsername() {
return username;
}
#JsonProperty("username")
public void setUsername(String username) {
this.username = username;
}
#JsonAnyGetter
public Map<String, Object> getAdditionalProperties() {
return this.additionalProperties;
}
#JsonAnySetter
public void setAdditionalProperty(String name, Object value) {
this.additionalProperties.put(name, value);
}
Now i want to set the values in these models by creating their respective objects and finally i got one main object with all the data. like this
Value Vobj1 = new Value();
Vobj1.setContent("00098");
Vobj1.setSpecialValueId("LITERAL");
List<Value> valueList1= new ArrayList<Value>();
valueList1.add(Vobj1);
Value Vobj2 = new Value();
Vobj2.setContent("SM");
Vobj2.setSpecialValueId("LITERAL");
List<Value> valueList2= new ArrayList<Value>();
valueList2.add(Vobj2);
Value Vobj3 = new Value();
Vobj3.setContent("01/01/17");
Vobj3.setSpecialValueId("LITERAL");
List<Value> valueList3= new ArrayList<Value>();
valueList3.add(Vobj3);
Condition Cobj1 = new Condition();
Cobj1.setControlId("F4211.CO");
Cobj1.setOperator("EQUAL");
Cobj1.setValue(valueList1);
Condition Cobj2 = new Condition();
Cobj2.setControlId("F4211.DCTO");
Cobj2.setOperator("EQUAL");
Cobj2.setValue(valueList1);
Condition Cobj3 = new Condition();
Cobj3.setControlId("F4211.UPMJ");
Cobj3.setOperator("GREATER_EQUAL");
Cobj3.setValue(valueList1);
List<Condition> conditionList1 = new ArrayList<Condition>();
conditionList1.add(Cobj1);
conditionList1.add(Cobj2);
conditionList1.add(Cobj3);
Query Qobj1= new Query();
Qobj1.setAutoClear(true);
Qobj1.setAutoFind(true);
Qobj1.setCondition(conditionList1);
Qobj1.setMatchType("MATCH_ALL");
JSONStructure obj=new JSONStructure();
obj.setAliasNaming(true);
obj.setDataServiceType("BROWSE");
obj.setDeviceName("MyDevice");
obj.setLangPref(" ");
obj.setMaxPageSize("2000");
obj.setOutputType("VERSION1");
obj.setPassword("!J0g3t6000");
obj.setQuery(Qobj1);
obj.setReturnControlIDs("F4211.DOCO|F4211.TRDJ|F4211.CRCD|F4211.AN8|F4211.DSC2|F4211.DSC1|F4211.LITM|F4211.LOTN|F4211.UORG|F4211.UPRC|F4211.AEXP");
obj.setTargetName("F4211");
obj.setTargetType("table");
obj.setToken(Token);
obj.setUsername("JOGET");
Now obj is my final object that i am going to pass to an http request and call the api and get the data from it. i want to make sure that my json is created correct, how am i suppose to print the all the data inside this object? and am i going correct with this approach?
if you use maven put gson into your pom.xml
<dependency>
<groupId>com.google.code.gson</groupId>
<artifactId>gson</artifactId>
<version>2.8.5</version>
</dependency>
then print your object like this
System.out.println(new Gson().toJson(yourObj));
your object will print in json
I found two full working examples that is familiar with your case.
1) Using Gson refer to the tutorial Parse json string and java object into Gson tree model
2) Using Jackson refer to the tutorial Convert Java Object to/from JSON using JACKSON API
Hope this help.
i am making a post request to rest api from postman with body as json :
{
"username":"ramakanta",
"password":"test",
"StudentID":"1025"
}
And server side resouces are
public class PushDataEntity {
private String username;
private String password;
private String StudentID;
public String getUsername() {
return username;
}
public void setUsername(String username) {
this.username = username;
}
public String getPassword() {
return password;
}
public void setPassword(String password) {
this.password = password;
}
public String getStudentID() {
return StudentID;
}
#JsonProperty("StudentID")
public void setStudentID(String StudentID) {
this.StudentID = StudentID;
}
}
#Path("/pushdata")
public class PushDataServiceImpl {
#POST
#Produces(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
#Consumes(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
public Response dataPush(#Context HttpServletRequest request,PushDataEntity pushDataEntity) throws Exception {
System.out.println(pushDataEntity.getStudentID());//null
}
username and password is mapping but StudentID is not mapping to pojo property. I have tried adding #JsonProperty("StudentID") to setter , getter and property level even , didn't workout. i dont want any change in json, what i should change in java side to make that json property mapped to pojo property. please provide a solution for this. Thanks in advance.
You are sending StudentId, but having StudentID in POJO (the last "d" is different). Either change the JSON in request, or add #JsonProperty("StudentId") annotation to the POJO.
UPDATE
Signature of the method is wrong, there is no such annotation: #ContextHttpServletRequestrequest, it should be
public Response dataPush(#Context HttpServletRequest request,,PushDataEntity pushDataEntity) throws Exception {
You need to put #JsonProperty over the getter function of StudentID.
To explain the problem I'm dealing with I will first provide the code.
RecipeController
#RequestMapping(path = "/addrecipe")
public void addNewRecipe(#RequestBody AddRecipeDto addRecipeDto){
Recipe newRecipe = new Recipe();
EvaUser user = evaUserRepository.findOne(addRecipeDto.getUserId());
for(Ingredient ingredient: addRecipeDto.getIngredients()){
ingredientRepository.save(ingredient);
}
newRecipe.setTitle(addRecipeDto.getTitle());
newRecipe.setAuthor(user);
newRecipe.setDescription(addRecipeDto.getDescription());
newRecipe.setIngredients(addRecipeDto.getIngredients());
recipeRepository.save(newRecipe);
user.getMyRecipes().add(newRecipe);
evaUserRepository.save(user);
}
UserController
#RequestMapping("/getusers")
public Iterable<EvaUser> getAllUsers() {
return evaUserRepository.findAll();
}
EvaUser
#OneToMany
private List<Recipe> myRecipes;
#ManyToMany
private List<Recipe> favoriteRecipes;
Recipe
#ManyToOne
private EvaUser author;
Exception
Failed to write HTTP message:
org.springframework.http.converter.HttpMessageNotWritableException: Could
not write content: Infinite recursion
Problem
So when I call the method to add a recipe, I want the database to know that there is a new recipe and that the new recipe is linked to the user who added it. When I drop the part where I save the user-entity, the mapping isn't made at all. But when I use the userRepository to tell the database that there has been made a change (adding the recipe to their list) it seems like there is an infinite loop of adding new users.
Answering to your question and including the last requirements from your comments.
If you want to break the loop, but some somehow want to keep also nested objects, I would recommend to write a custom serializer and replace the the object which causes the endless recursion with some other field (I used author username which is String instead of Author object in the example below).
To reproduce the case I created a mock model which is similar to yours.
Recipe:
public class Recipe {
private EvaUser author;
private String name = "test";
private String ingridients = "carrots, tomatos";
public EvaUser getAuthor() {
return author;
}
public void setAuthor(EvaUser author) {
this.author = author;
}
public String getName() {
return name;
}
public void setName(String name) {
this.name = name;
}
public String getIngridients() {
return ingridients;
}
public void setIngridients(String ingridients) {
this.ingridients = ingridients;
}
}
EvaUser:
public class EvaUser {
private List<Recipe> myRecipes = new ArrayList<>();
private List<Recipe> favoriteRecipes = new ArrayList<>();
private String username;
public List<Recipe> getMyRecipes() {
return myRecipes;
}
public void setMyRecipes(List<Recipe> myRecipes) {
this.myRecipes = myRecipes;
}
public List<Recipe> getFavoriteRecipes() {
return favoriteRecipes;
}
public void setFavoriteRecipes(List<Recipe> favoriteRecipes) {
this.favoriteRecipes = favoriteRecipes;
}
public String getUsername() {
return username;
}
public void setUsername(String username) {
this.username = username;
}
}
Creating a custom serializer:
import com.fasterxml.jackson.core.JsonGenerator;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.SerializerProvider;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ser.std.StdSerializer;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.util.Optional;
public class RecipeSerializer extends StdSerializer<Recipe> {
protected RecipeSerializer() {
this(null);
}
protected RecipeSerializer(Class<Recipe> t) {
super(t);
}
#Override
public void serialize(Recipe recipe, JsonGenerator gen, SerializerProvider provider) throws IOException {
gen.writeStartObject();
gen.writeStringField("name", recipe.getName());
gen.writeStringField("author", Optional.ofNullable(recipe.getAuthor().getUsername()).orElse("null"));
gen.writeStringField("ingridients", recipe.getIngridients());
gen.writeEndObject();
}
}
Applying serializer:
#JsonSerialize(using = RecipeSerializer.class)
public class Recipe {
// model entity
}
JSON response body of EvaUser from controller (previous one was StackOverflowError):
{
"myRecipes": [
{
"name": "soup",
"author": "user1",
"ingridients": "carrots, tomatos"
},
{
"name": "steak",
"author": "user1",
"ingridients": "meat, salt"
}
],
"favoriteRecipes": [
{
"name": "soup",
"author": "user1",
"ingridients": "carrots, tomatos"
},
{
"name": "steak",
"author": "user1",
"ingridients": "meat, salt"
}
],
"username": "user1"
}
I have the following JSON to represent the server response for a salt request:
{
"USER":
{
"E_MAIL":"email",
"SALT":"salt"
},
"CODE":"010"
}
And i tried to map it with the following POJO:
public class SaltPOJO {
private String code = null;
private User user = null;
#Override
public String toString() {
return this.user.toString();
}
public String getCode() {
return code;
}
public void setCode(String code) {
this.code = code;
}
public User getUser() {
return user;
}
public void setUser(User user) {
this.user = user;
}
public class User {
private String e_mail = null;
private String salt = null;
#Override
public String toString() {
return this.e_mail + ": " + this.salt;
}
public String getE_mail() {
return e_mail;
}
public void setE_mail(String e_mail) {
this.e_mail = e_mail;
}
public String getSalt() {
return salt;
}
public void setSalt(String salt) {
this.salt = salt;
}
}
}
Now everytime i do this:
Gson gson = new Gson();
SaltPOJO saltPojo = gson.fromJson(json.toString(), SaltPOJO.class);
Log.v("Bla", saltPojo.toString());
The saltPojo.toString() is null. How can i map my JSON into POJO using Gson?
Is the order of my variables important for the Gson mapping?
Is the order of my variables important for the Gson mapping?
No, that's not the case.
How can i map my JSON into POJO using Gson?
It's Case Sensitive and the keys in JSON string should be same as variable names used in POJO class.
You can use #SerializedName annotation to use any variable name as your like.
Sample code:
class SaltPOJO {
#SerializedName("CODE")
private String code = null;
#SerializedName("USER")
private User user = null;
...
class User {
#SerializedName("E_MAIL")
private String e_mail = null;
#SerializedName("SALT")
private String salt = null;
You don't have proper mapping between your getter and setter. If you change your json to something like below, it would work:
{
"user":
{
"email":"email",
"salt":"salt"
},
"code":"010"
}
If you are getting json form third party then unfortunately, you would have to change your pojo or you could use adapter.
I have used Jackson and JSONObject to generate a plain JSON - things are fine here. I have a specific case where my pojo looks like below and i need the JSON is the specified format.
package test;
import javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlRootElement;
#XmlRootElement(name = "login")
public class LoginApi implements IRestBean {
private String username;
private String password;
private String sfSessionId;
private String sfServerUrl;
public String getUsername() {
return username;
}
public void setUsername(String username) {
this.username = username;
}
public String getPassword() {
return password;
}
public void setPassword(String password) {
this.password = password;
}
public String getSfSessionId() {
return sfSessionId;
}
public void setSfSessionId(String sfSessionId) {
this.sfSessionId = sfSessionId;
}
public String getSfServerUrl() {
return sfServerUrl;
}
public void setSfServerUrl(String sfServerUrl) {
this.sfServerUrl = sfServerUrl;
}
}
The JSON that i am able to generate looks like this:
{
"username" : null,
"password" : null,
"sfSessionId" : null,
"sfServerUrl" : null
}
But this is not my requirement - i need the JSON in the below format so that my server accepts this as a valid JSON:
{
"#type":"login",
"username":"username#domain.com",
"password":"password",
"sfSessionId":null,
"sfServerUrl":null
}
Please help. Thanks in advance!
Add a private field to the POJO with the type.
#XmlRootElement(name = "login")
public class LoginApi implements IRestBean {
...
#XmlAttribute(name = "type")
private String getJsonType() {
return "login";
}
...
}
Note the use of XmlAttribute to automatically append an "#" to the name.
Change the IRestBean interface to include the #JsonTypeInfo annotation:
#JsonTypeInfo(use=JsonTypeInfo.Id.NAME, include=JsonTypeInfo.As.PROPERTY, property="#type")
public interface IRestBean {
...
}
Next, annotate the LoginApi class with #JsonTypeName:
#XmlRootElement(name = "login")
#JsonTypeName("login")
public class LoginApi implements IRestBean {
...
}
These are both Jackson-specific annotations.