I have spring session scoped bean. That bean is using application scoped beans, and there's and error when the container tries to serialize the session.
I remember that problem from JSF applications, and in one project, we've solved that using serializable proxies. The injected bean was the proxy wrapper which fetched the singleton instance from the application context. Unfortunately, I can't remember how exactly it was called and was it a build-in solution or some external thing.
How to wrap spring beans in serializable proxies? Does Spring provide such functionality? AFAIR there was some special annotation to mark the references that should be wrapped in such proxy.
The feature is called scoped proxy and can be triggered via annotation to the service, that will be injected to session scoped beans:
#Scope(proxyMode = ScopedProxyMode.INTERFACES)
More details in question:
Spring session-scoped beans (controllers) and references to services, in terms of serialization
Related
Everyone says that it's because spring boot in that case will know that service exists. But if you call that service's method in another method that you try to run when the web app is running. Should it know the service exists without the annotation or not?
The main reason you put these stereotype annotations to classes is creating beans in application context and let the IOC container to provide the management and configuration of these beans depending on their stereotypes.
Spring is an IOC container responsible for instantiating, configuring and assembling these beans. And putting stereotype annotation is just a way to define bean.
You can define beans in various ways such as using #Bean annotation, stereotype annotations, XML definitions etc. and if you don't define your bean, the IOC container can not detect and instantiate the service.
I am a beginner of Spring and I still can't understand clearly what Bean is. From its definition, it seems a object that is determined by some pre-set configuration files or using annotation on a class. Once the spring starts up, the bean has been created. But can Spring use DI to create some instances of which attributes are not pre-determined?(Like, a user posts a json from website to Spring. And this json contains some data that are used to new a instance. Can Spring use this json to create the instance by using DI?)
Bean is just the object created by your spring application. As you know any spring application has several interacting objects working together to give rise to the desired programmed behavior.
A Bean is basically a managed object i.e at run time the IOC container creates the bean object based on its definition supplied by the coder or as configured in the apllicationContext.xml file under beans tag, and injects it to other classes as required.
Any Spring application is basically a conglomeration of various objects interacting with each other, these objects or beans collaborate to create the application.
A Bean's lifecycle is managed by the Spring IOC container.
The JSON consumed by the Spring Application is taken care of by the HttpMessageConverter. When recieving a new request, the Spring framework will use the content-type header to determine the media type of the request.
It will then try to find the corresponding converter, available in the classpath of the application, to convert the Request body.
Thus its clear that the incoming request body object is not managed by the Spring IOC container and hence is not a Bean.
But these deserialized instances are used as Data Transfer Objects in a Spring application's various layers like, service, DAO, controller.
Spring beans are the objects that comprise your application and are managed by the Spring framework. Comparing them to the concepts of JavaBeans and POJOs provides some explanatory context, and the Spring reference documentation contains extensive documentation of Spring beans, including this summary:
A bean definition essentially is a recipe for creating one or more
objects. The container looks at the recipe for a named bean when
asked, and uses the configuration metadata encapsulated by that bean
definition to create (or acquire) an actual object.
Also included in the reference documentation are descriptions of various ways to instantiate beans via an xml-based or annotation-based configuration approach as well as the Java Config approach (which also uses annotations). This is managed by the Spring BeanFactory interface (API here; source here).
The #Bean annotation is used to indicate that a method instantiates,
configures and initializes a new object to be managed by the Spring
IoC container. For those familiar with Spring’s XML
configuration the #Bean annotation plays the same role as the
element. You can use #Bean annotated methods with any Spring
#Component, however, they are most often used with #Configuration
beans.
You refer in the question to Dependency Injection (DI), a design pattern based on the Inversion of Control principle, which is a critical part of the Spring Framework, particularly for bean instantiation. DI allows values to be passed into the object from outside. The Spring documentation describes both the constructor-based and setter-based approaches to DI provided by the Spring IoC container for instantiating objects (beans).
I am new to Spring MVC and have a little idea of the usage of java beans in Java.
What is the basic difference between a Java bean and Spring bean?
JavaBeans:
At a basic level, JavaBeans are simply Java classes which adhere to certain coding conventions. Specifically, classes that
have public default (no argument) constructors
allow access to their properties using accessor (getter and setter) methods
implement java.io.Serializable
Spring Beans:
A Spring bean is basically an object managed by Spring. More specifically, it is an object that is instantiated, configured and otherwise managed by a Spring Framework container. Spring beans are defined in Spring configuration files (or, more recently, with annotations), instantiated by Spring containers, and then injected into applications.
Note that Spring beans need not always be JavaBeans. Spring beans might not implement the java.io.Serializable interface, can have arguments in their constructors, etc.
This is the very basic difference between JavaBeans and Spring beans.
For more information, refer to the source of the above text, Shaun Abram's article JavaBeans vs Spring beans vs POJOs.
Java bean is a class that should follow following conventions:
1.Must implement Serializable.
2.It should have a public no-arg constructor.
3.All properties in java bean must be private with public getters and setter methods.
Spring beans are the objects that form the backbone of your application and are managed by the Spring IoC container .
Spring Bean:
A class which is developed as part of a spring application. Its life cycle which is managed by Spring Container is called as Spring Bean.
Java beans and Spring beans are more related than different.
For a Java class to be usable as a Java bean, its setter- and getter-method names need to be as per the JavaBean guidelines (also called design patterns) for properties. If such a Java class is instantiable & manageable by the Spring IoC container, it is a Spring bean. To achieve this, the programmer wires the class as a bean definition of a suitable scope by using XML config files or annotations or a mix of both. The programmer can create new Spring beans out of existing Spring beans by wiring further by passing the latter to constructor-arguments of the former either as string-names as <idref> elements or by dependency injection (it can be recursive).
This answer may be read in conjunction with my this SO answer to get more background information.
I have some beans which contain methods which are annotated with both #RolesAllowed and #Transactional. I have one Spring config file which utilizes a BeanNameAutoProxyCreator for Security related beans and another Spring config file which utilizes a BeanNameAutoProxyCreator for Transactional related beans.
The problem is that some beans contain both security as well as transactional-related beans. So Spring creates proxies for one set of beans. It then tries to create proxies for the other set of beans. When it does, it tries to create proxies of the proxies and bombs out.
Has anyone tried to configure both security and transactionality in the same beans via Spring? What's the trick?
Thanks.
I've never tried it, buy I would look to use one BeanNameAutoProxyCreator that works on both annotation? This BeanNameAutoProxyCreator can create a proxy that delegates to the security and transactional proxies.
I am having a EJB 3.0 Session Bean which implements the Local interface, and I have a pure POJO also.
How can I inject a Session Bean into the POJO rather than manual JNDI look up in to POJO through spring(using #Resource and SpringBeanAutowiringInterceptor)?.
Is there any way to do that?
To inject an EJB3 into a POJO (which is possible since Spring 2.5), I think that you should use #EJB instead of #Resource. Quoting Spring EJB and JPA (read it all, it has many examples):
Don't forget to add:
<context:annotation-config/>
It allows various annotations to be detected in bean classes: Spring's #Required and #Autowired, as well as JSR 250's #PostConstruct, #PreDestroy and #Resource (if available), JAX-WS's #WebServiceRef (if available), EJB3's #EJB (if available), and JPA's #PersistenceContext and #PersistenceUnit (if available). Alternatively, you may choose to activate the individual BeanPostProcessors for those annotations.
Also have a look at Spring support for #EJB annotations: example? on the Spring forums.
One option is to use the poetically-named LocalStatelessSessionProxyFactoryBean, which creates a spring bean proxy pointing at the session EJB on JNDI. You can then wire this proxy into your POJO using the usual Spring wiring techniques. The proxy bean will implement the same local interface of your EJB.
See this section of the Spring manual for an example.