Picking up application property through cucumber step definition classes - java

I have a spring boot application with the cucumber and selenium test setup. I am trying to create a UI wrapper for running my cucumber test scenarios. I need to run the selected feature files for which i am using the cucumber.api.cli.Main.run method.
The problem is i am trying to pick properties through my application.yml files, but my step definition class is not able to pick the properties.
This is how my code looks like -
RunCukes Class
#RunWith(Cucumber.class)
#CucumberOptions(features = {"classpath:features"},
plugin = { "pretty", "html:target/cucumber-html-report","json:target/cucumber.json" },
tags = {"~#ignore"})
public class RunCukesTest {
}
The class from where the cucumber feature files are run
#Service
public class SeleniumLogic {
#Autowired
RunCukesTest runCukes;
public byte runTest(String[] argv) throws IOException{
byte result = cucumber.api.cli.Main.run(argv,runCukes.getClass().getClassLoader());
return result;
}
}
The stepdefinition class
#Component
public class LoginTestSteps {
#Autowired
private LoginPage loginPage;
#Value("${host.name}")
private String HOST_NAME;
#Given("^User is on the login page$")
public void user_is_on_the_login_page() throws Throwable {
loginPage.load(HOST_NAME);
}
}
Application.yml
host:
name: abc.com
The HOST_NAME is coming as null in the LoginTestSteps class.

Came across the same issue, my conclusion was that it's not possible to do it like that. The application.yml is a configuration file for Spring, therefore with a Cucumber project you'll have to do your own configuration file format and read from it. You can have a
#Value("${host.name:abc.com}")
So that abc.com is your default, and you can override it when running the project with a
java -jar -Dhost.name=myotherurl.com pathToYourJar/myJar.jar

Try this:
#Component
#PropertySource("classpath:application.properties")
public class LoginTestSteps {

Related

Unable to find a #SpringBootConfiguration when doing a JpaTest

I'm trying to run a simple Junit test to see if my CrudRepositories are indeed working.
The error I keep getting is:
Unable to find a #SpringBootConfiguration, you need to use #ContextConfiguration or #SpringBootTest(classes=...) with your test
java.lang.IllegalStateException
Doesn't Spring Boot configure itself?
My Test Class:
#RunWith(SpringRunner.class)
#DataJpaTest
#SpringBootTest(webEnvironment = WebEnvironment.RANDOM_PORT)
public class JpaTest {
#Autowired
private AccountRepository repository;
#After
public void clearDb(){
repository.deleteAll();
}
#Test
public void createAccount(){
long id = 12;
Account u = new Account(id,"Tim Viz");
repository.save(u);
assertEquals(repository.findOne(id),u);
}
#Test
public void findAccountByUsername(){
long id = 12;
String username = "Tim Viz";
Account u = new Account(id,username);
repository.save(u);
assertEquals(repository.findByUsername(username),u);
}
My Spring Boot application starter:
#SpringBootApplication
#EnableJpaRepositories(basePackages = {"domain.repositories"})
#ComponentScan(basePackages = {"controllers","domain"})
#EnableWebMvc
#PropertySources(value {#PropertySource("classpath:application.properties")})
#EntityScan(basePackages={"domain"})
public class Application extends SpringBootServletInitializer {
public static void main(String[] args) {
ApplicationContext ctx = SpringApplication.run(Application.class, args);
}
}
My Repository:
public interface AccountRepository extends CrudRepository<Account,Long> {
public Account findByUsername(String username);
}
}
Indeed, Spring Boot does set itself up for the most part. You can probably already get rid of a lot of the code you posted, especially in Application.
I wish you had included the package names of all your classes, or at least the ones for Application and JpaTest. The thing about #DataJpaTest and a few other annotations is that they look for a #SpringBootConfiguration annotation in the current package, and if they cannot find it there, they traverse the package hierarchy until they find it.
For example, if the fully qualified name for your test class was com.example.test.JpaTest and the one for your application was com.example.Application, then your test class would be able to find the #SpringBootApplication (and therein, the #SpringBootConfiguration).
If the application resided in a different branch of the package hierarchy, however, like com.example.application.Application, it would not find it.
Example
Consider the following Maven project:
my-test-project
+--pom.xml
+--src
+--main
+--com
+--example
+--Application.java
+--test
+--com
+--example
+--test
+--JpaTest.java
And then the following content in Application.java:
package com.example;
#SpringBootApplication
public class Application {
public static void main(String[] args) {
SpringApplication.run(Application.class, args);
}
}
Followed by the contents of JpaTest.java:
package com.example.test;
#RunWith(SpringRunner.class)
#DataJpaTest
public class JpaTest {
#Test
public void testDummy() {
}
}
Everything should be working. If you create a new folder inside src/main/com/example called app, and then put your Application.java inside it (and update the package declaration inside the file), running the test will give you the following error:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Unable to find a #SpringBootConfiguration, you need to use #ContextConfiguration or #SpringBootTest(classes=...) with your test
Configuration is attached to the application class, so the following will set up everything correctly:
#SpringBootTest(classes = Application.class)
Example from the JHipster project here.
It is worth to check if you have refactored package name of your main class annotated with #SpringBootApplication. In that case the testcase should be in an appropriate package otherwise it will be looking for it in the older package . this was the case for me.
It work fo me
the package name of the above test class is changed to the same as the package name of the normal class.
change to this
In addition to what Thomas Kåsene said, you can also add
#SpringBootTest(classes=com.package.path.class)
to the test annotation to specify where it should look for the other class if you didn't want to refactor your file hierarchy. This is what the error message hints at by saying:
Unable to find a #SpringBootConfiguration, you need to use
#ContextConfiguration or #SpringBootTest(classes=...) ...
In my case the packages were different between the Application and Test classes
package com.example.abc;
...
#SpringBootApplication
public class ProducerApplication {
and
package com.example.abc_etc;
...
#RunWith(SpringRunner.class)
#SpringBootTest
public class ProducerApplicationTest {
After making them agree the tests ran correctly.
I had the same issue and I solved by adding an empty class annotated with SpringBootApplication in the root package of the folder src/test/java
package org.enricogiurin.core;
import org.springframework.boot.autoconfigure.SpringBootApplication;
#SpringBootApplication
public class CoreTestConfiguration {}
The test slice provided in Spring Boot 1.4 brought feature oriented test capabilities.
For example,
#JsonTest provides a simple Jackson environment to test the json serialization and deserialization.
#WebMvcTest provides a mock web environment, it can specify the controller class for test and inject the MockMvc in the test.
#WebMvcTest(PostController.class)
public class PostControllerMvcTest{
#Inject MockMvc mockMvc;
}
#DataJpaTest will prepare an embedded database and provides basic JPA environment for the test.
#RestClientTest provides REST client environment for the test, esp the RestTemplateBuilder etc.
These annotations are not composed with SpringBootTest, they are combined with a series of AutoconfigureXXX and a #TypeExcludesFilter annotations.
Have a look at #DataJpaTest.
#Target(ElementType.TYPE)
#Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
#Documented
#Inherited
#BootstrapWith(SpringBootTestContextBootstrapper.class)
#OverrideAutoConfiguration(enabled = false)
#TypeExcludeFilters(DataJpaTypeExcludeFilter.class)
#Transactional
#AutoConfigureCache
#AutoConfigureDataJpa
#AutoConfigureTestDatabase
#AutoConfigureTestEntityManager
#ImportAutoConfiguration
public #interface DataJpaTest {}
You can add your #AutoconfigureXXX annotation to override the default config.
#AutoConfigureTestDatabase(replace=NONE)
#DataJpaTest
public class TestClass{
}
Let's have a look at your problem,
Do not mix #DataJpaTest and #SpringBootTest, as said above #DataJpaTest will build the configuration in its own way(eg. by default, it will try to prepare an embedded H2 instead) from the application configuration inheritance. #DataJpaTest is designated for test slice.
If you want to customize the configuration of #DataJpaTest, please read this official blog entry from Spring.io for this topic,(a little tedious).
Split the configurations in Application into smaller configurations by features, such as WebConfig, DataJpaConfig etc. A full featured configuration(mixed web, data, security etc) also caused your test slice based tests to be failed. Check the test samples in my sample.
In my case
Make sure your (test package name) of YourApplicationTests is equivalent to the (main package name).
When all the classes were in same package, test classes were working. As soon as I moved all the java classes to different package to maintain proper project structure I was getting the same error.
I solved it by providing my main class name in the test class like below.
#SpringBootTest(classes=JunitBasicsApplication.class)
I think that the best solution for this issue is to align your tests folders structure with the application folder structure.
I had the same issue which was caused by duplicating my project from a different folder structure project.
if your test project and your application project will have the same structure you will not be required to add any special annotations to your tests classes and everything will work as is.
Make sure the test class is in a sub-package of your main spring boot class
This is more the the error itself, not answering the original question:
We were migrating from java 8 to java 11. Application compiled successfully, but the errors Unable to find a #SpringBootConfiguration started to appear in the integration tests when ran from command line using maven (from IntelliJ it worked).
It appeared that maven-failsafe-plugin stopped seeing the classes on classpath, we fixed that by telling failsafe plugin to include the classes manually:
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-failsafe-plugin</artifactId>
<configuration>
<additionalClasspathElements>
<additionalClasspathElement>${basedir}/target/classes</additionalClasspathElement>
</additionalClasspathElements>
</configuration>
...
</plugin>
In my case I was using the Test class from wrong package.
when I replaced import org.junit.Test; with import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test; it worked.
None of the suggested solutions worked because I don't have #SpringBootApplication in the system. But I figured it out - this is how I fixed:
// AppConfig.java
#Configuration
#ComponentScan("foo")
#ConfigurationPropertiesScan
public class AppConfig {
// ...
}
// HelloWorld.java
#Service
public class HelloWorld {
public void foo() {
// ...
}
}
// HelloWorldTest.java
#SpringBootTest(classes = { AppConfig.class, HelloWorld.class })
public class HelloWorldTest {
#Autowired private HelloWorld helloWorld;
#Test
public testFoo() {
this.helloWorld.foo(); // Testing logic
}
}
The key is including both AppConfig.class and HelloWorld.class in #SpringBootTest.
import org.junit.Test;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired;
import org.springframework.boot.test.autoconfigure.orm.jpa.DataJpaTest;
import org.springframework.boot.test.autoconfigure.web.servlet.AutoConfigureWebMvc;
import org.springframework.boot.test.context.SpringBootTest;
import org.springframework.test.context.junit4.SpringRunner;
#RunWith(SpringRunner.class)
#DataJpaTest
#SpringBootTest
#AutoConfigureWebMvc
public class RepoTest {
#Autowired
private ThingShiftDetailsRepository thingShiftDetailsRepo;
#Test
public void findThingShiftDetails() {
ShiftDetails details = new ShiftDetails();
details.setThingId(1);
thingShiftDetailsRepo.save(details);
ShiftDetails dbDetails = thingShiftDetailsRepo.findByThingId(1);
System.out.println(dbDetails);
}
}
Above annotations worked well for me. I am using spring boot with JPA.

Unit testing of Spring Boot Actuator endpoints not working when specifying a port

recently I changed my spring boot properties to define a management port.
In doing so, my unit tests started to fail :(
I wrote a unit test that tested the /metrics endpoint as follows:
#RunWith (SpringRunner.class)
#DirtiesContext
#SpringBootTest
public class MetricsTest {
#Autowired
private WebApplicationContext context;
private MockMvc mvc;
/**
* Called before each test.
*/
#Before
public void setUp() {
this.context.getBean(MetricsEndpoint.class).setEnabled(true);
this.mvc = MockMvcBuilders.webAppContextSetup(this.context).build();
}
/**
* Test for home page.
*
* #throws Exception On failure.
*/
#Test
public void home()
throws Exception {
this.mvc.perform(MockMvcRequestBuilders.get("/metrics"))
.andExpect(MockMvcResultMatchers.status().isOk());
}
}
Previously this was passing. After adding:
management.port=9001
The tests started failing with:
home Failed: java.lang.AssertionError: Status expected: <200> but was: <404>
I tried changing the #SpringBootTest annotation with:
#SpringBootTest (properties = {"management.port=<server.port>"})
Where is the number used for the server.port. This didn't seem to make any difference.
So then changed the management.port value in the property file to be the same as the server.port. Same result.
The only way to get the test to work is remove the management.port from the property file.
Any suggestions/thoughts ?
Thanks
For Spring Boot 2.x the integration tests configuration could be simplified.
For example simple custom heartbeat endpoint
#Component
#Endpoint(id = "heartbeat")
public class HeartbeatEndpoint {
#ReadOperation
public String heartbeat() {
return "";
}
}
Where integration test for this endpoint
#SpringBootTest(
classes = HeartbeatEndpointTest.Config.class,
properties = {
"management.endpoint.heartbeat.enabled=true",
"management.endpoints.web.exposure.include=heartbeat"
})
#AutoConfigureMockMvc
#EnableAutoConfiguration
class HeartbeatEndpointTest {
private static final String ENDPOINT_PATH = "/actuator/heartbeat";
#Autowired
private MockMvc mockMvc;
#Test
void testHeartbeat() throws Exception {
mockMvc
.perform(get(ENDPOINT_PATH))
.andExpect(status().isOk())
.andExpect(content().string(""));
}
#Configuration
#Import(ProcessorTestConfig.class)
static class Config {
#Bean
public HeartbeatEndpoint heartbeatEndpoint() {
return new HeartbeatEndpoint();
}
}
}
For Spring boot test we need to specify the port it needs to connect to.
By default, it connects to server.port which in case of actuators is different.
This can be done by
#SpringBootTest(properties = "server.port=8090")
in application.properties we specify the management port as below
...
management.server.port=8090
...
Did you try adding the following annotation to your test class?
#TestPropertySource(properties = {"management.port=0"})
Check the following link for reference.
Isn't there an error in the property name?
Shouldn't be
#TestPropertySource(properties = {"management.server.port=..."}) instead of #TestPropertySource(properties = {"management.port=.."})
The guide stated that this can be achieved with #AutoConfigureMetrics.
And I moved with this.
Regardless of your classpath, meter registries, except the in-memory backed, are not auto-configured when using #SpringBootTest.
If you need to export metrics to a different backend as part of an integration test, annotate it with #AutoConfigureMetrics.
https://docs.spring.io/spring-boot/docs/current/reference/html/features.html#features.testing.spring-boot-applications.metrics
Had the same issue, you just have to make the management.port null by adding this in your application-test.properties (set it to empty value)
management.port=
Make sure you use the test profile in your JUnit by annotating the class with
#ActiveProfiles("test")
Try using
#SpringBootTest(properties = {"management.port="})
Properties defined in the #SpringBootTest annotation have a higher precedence than those in application properties. "management.port=" will "unset" the management.port property.
This way you don't have to worry about configuring the port in your tests.
I was facing the same issue and tried several things but this is how I was able to solve mine without making any change in the application.yaml
Sample actuator endpoint
#Component
#RestControllerEndpoint(id = "endpoint")
public class SampleEndpoint
{
#GetMapping
public String sampleEndpoint(){
return ""
}
}
Unit test case
#RunWith(SpringRunner.class)
#SpringBootTest(
classes = {SampleEndpointTest.Config.class},
properties = {"management.server.port="}
)
#AutoConfigureMockMvc
public class SampleEndpointTest
{
#Autowired
private MockMvc mockMvc;
#SpringBootApplication(scanBasePackageClasses = {SampleEndpoint.class})
public static class Config
{
}
#Test
public void testSampleEndpoint() throws Exception
{
mockMvc.perform(
MockMvcRequestBuilders.get("/actuator/enpoint").accept(APPLICATION_JSON)
).andExpect(status().isOk());
}
Since now info endpoint must be enabled manually make sure the SpringBootTest tag includes this in properties, like this:
#SpringBootTest(
properties = {
"management.info.env.enabled=true" ,
"management.endpoints.web.exposure.include=info, health"
})
I had this problem recently, and as none of the above answers made any sense to me, I decided to do a bit more reading. In my case, I had already defined both server.port and management.server.port as 8091 in my test application-test.yaml file, and could not understand why my test was getting a connection refused error message.
It turns out that instead of using the annotation #SpringBootTest() I needed to use #SpringBootTest(webEnvironment = SpringBootTest.WebEnvironment.DEFINED_PORT) - which causes the port numbers in the yaml file to be used. This is briefly discussed in the manual. Quoting the relevant section:
DEFINED_PORT — Loads an EmbeddedWebApplicationContext and provides a real servlet environment. Embedded servlet containers are started and listening on a defined port (i.e from your application.properties or on the default port 8080).
It seems in SpringBootTest the default is to avoid starting a real servlet environment, and if no WebEnvironment is explicitly specified then SpringBootTest.WebEnvironment.MOCK is used as a default.
After a long search: There is this nice Springboot annotation called #LocalManagementPort!
It works similar to #LocalServerPort but for actuator endpoins.
An example config would look as follows
#SpringBootTest(webEnvironment = SpringBootTest.WebEnvironment.RANDOM_PORT)
public class MetricsIT {
#Autowired
RestTemplateBuilder restTemplateBuilder;
#LocalManagementPort
int managementPort;
#Test
public void testMetrics(){
ResponseEntity<String> response = restTemplateBuilder
.rootUri("http://localhost:" + managementPort + "/actuator")
.build().exchange("/metrics", HttpMethod.GET, new HttpEntity<>(null), String.class);
}
}

how to use spring's #IntegrationTest in main method?

i have a spring boot application. sometimes i need to launch long running report generation. the easiest way was to create an #IntegrationTest to use spring's #Autowire:
#RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
#WebAppConfiguration
#SpringApplicationConfiguration(classes=Application.class)
#IntegrationTest
public class ReportGenerationTest {
#Autowired MyService myService;
#Value("classpath:/test.txt") Resource testData; //it's in test, not in src
#Test
public void generate_report() {
report(myService, testData);
}
}
it works perfectly. but i don't want it to be run with every build. i also don't want to add/remove #Ignore as sooner or later someone will accidentally commit it without #Ignore and i don't want to do any code editing just to run reports
ideally i would like it to be a main method run on demand. but how can i manually create a spring context for the src service and test resources?
i need something like:
public class MyReport {
public static void main(String[] args) {
ReportGenerationTest reportGenerator = getAutowiredInstanceFromSpring();
reportGenerator.generate_report();
}
}

Test Spring for case when context should not even load

I would like to test my Spring Boot application against case when no config file is given. In such situation application should throw exception when creating bean MyConfig.
#SpringBootApplication
public class MyApplication {
public static void main(String[] args) {
SpringApplication.run(MyApplication.class, args);
}
#Bean
public MyConfig myConfig() throws IOException {
if (no config file) throw new NoConfigFileException();
}
}
I have a test which tests if Spring application's context is built:
#RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
#SpringApplicationConfiguration(classes = MyApplication.class)
#TestPropertySource(locations="classpath:file_with_existing_config_file_path.properties")
public class MyApplicationTest {
#Test
public void contextLoads() {
}
}
This test fails - as expected (since myConfig method throws NoConfigFileException). Unfortunately I cannot "turn the light to green" using annotation #Test(expected = NoConfigFileException.class).
Where should I expect exception if not in the only one test method I got?
Golden rule when you are writing automated tests is -> cover one test case per test method (unless you are having parametrized test). It seems to me that you are thinking about breaking that rule.
Consider separate test class (where you don't specify properties file) which is testing only this aspect or your logic. That way you can use #Test(expected = NoConfigFileException.class).
BTW, I would suggest to look into Spring Boot feature #ConfigurationProperties. You can use Java EE validation (e.g. #NotNull) for your properties.
That way you can enforce application to find the file and fail it early if no config file is loaded into Spring Context.

Initialize database only when running Test using Spring java based configuration

I have the code to create data source and run scripts to create schema and add in data using java based spring configuration. I want to run those scripts only in test mode. Is there any annotation that I need to specify on top of the database initializer bean that would do the job?
You can use #profile annotation for this, like:
#Configuration
#Profile("test_profile")
public class StandaloneDataConfig {
#Bean
public DataSource dataSource() {
// do data source creation/initialization
}
}
Then use:
#RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
#ContextConfiguration(loader=AnnotationConfigContextLoader.class,
classes={StandaloneDataConfig.class})
#ActiveProfiles("test_profile")
public class TransferServiceTest {
#Autowired
private TransferService transferService;
#Test
public void testTransferService() {
// test the transferService
}
}
You can read this blog post from the Spring team to learn more details.

Categories