I'm not sure if I understand it correctly so want to clarify.
If I want to create a repository for my entity eg.:
public interface BookRepository extends JpaRepository<Book, Id> {}
Should I annotate it with #Repository? According to this question #Repository annotation translates exceptions from SQL to persistence ones but doesn't JpaRepostiory already do that? What's the best practice - to annotate or not?
While using JpaRepository you don't need to annotate the interface with #Repository
It is just an interface and the concrete implementation is created dynamically as a proxy object by Spring and the JDBC Exceptions are handled there.
You need to use #Repository when you create a Custom DAO, so that spring creates a bean and handles the exception properly.
You need to annotate it with #Repository so spring knows it should instantiate that class as a bean. The #Component, #Service and #Repository annotations all serve the same purpose in that regard. #Repository narrows the scope to a service that specifically deals with obtaining and storing data.
Related
I have a Spring boot application which has a UserRepository but I have not annotated that repository with #Repository but still my application works fine.
Why #Repository annotation is optional in Spring boot and what is the best practise that should we annotate it or not in repository classes.
It is working because spring will scan the class path and identify given class is repository (DAO) based on the imports, when use #Repositary spring context know how to handle expections like re-throw to pre defined methods ..etc, and also this annotation help readability of the code.
For #Repository annotation even if you haven't mentioned Spring recognizes the repositories by the fact that they are extending Repository interfaces like JPARepository or CrudRepository.
So, it's not mandatory to mention annotation, you can check in your code whether you have mentioned #EnableJpaRepositories("packages") above Main class or not. That might also be one of the reasons why it is working.
As per best practices for annotations, they have a purpose to fulfill, #Repository is important from a database connection perspective, where it has lots of proper exceptions throw, or pre-defined methods.
If you do not use the proper annotations, you may face commit exceptions overridden by rollback transactions. You will see exceptions during the stress load test that is related to roll-back JDBC transactions.
For more clarity have a look at this post
I assume you have somewhere implicitly or explicitly a EnableJpaRepositories annotation which scans all Spring repositories and your repositories are extending CrudRepository or other Spring Data base classes.
The annotation is only needed when defining you own repositories without using Spring Data mechanism. Note, that Repository is just a special Component, latter should also do it to have DI enabled, so this is more for better recognizing the purpose of the class.
#Repository is used to indicate interface that extends a jpa repository, for example. Notice in the example below, the interface extends the Beer class and the BeerQueries query interface.
package com.algaworks.brewer.repository;
import org.springframework.data.jpa.repository.JpaRepository;
import org.springframework.stereotype.Repository;
import com.algaworks.brewer.model.Beer;
import com.algaworks.brewer.repository.helper.beer.BeersQueries;
#Repository
public interface Beers extends JpaRepository<Beer, Long>, BeersQueries {
}
I'm working with PostgresSQL and I have the following interface:
#Repository
public interface ExampleRepository extends CrudRepository<ExampleEntity, Long> { }
Then I try to get the bean:
ExampleRepository repository = ctx.getBean(ExampleRepository.class);
Of course, I can't do that, because there's no implementation and eventually I get
NoSuchBeanDefinitionException: No qualifying bean of type 'ExampleRepository'
I know this is a wrong approach, but since I'm not enough experienced, I've got no idea how I can communicate with my database. Any example I searched only explained how to implement services & controllers in order to interact with db through Browser. But I want to do CRUD operation inside the java code.
Could anyone explain it to me? Any related sources would also be fine.
I am not sure how you are getting context (ctx) here.
But the common approach is #Repository is not needed instead, #EnableJPARepositories should be used in the #Configuration file. Then use #Autowired to inject the repository into your service class (where you want to execute operation from your repository bean)
You can refer below link for more details
https://mkyong.com/spring-boot/spring-boot-spring-data-jpa/
You don't need to create bean. It will created by the spring framework because you annotated your interface as #Repository .You need only #Autowired in your service class or where do you want to use this reference.
#Autowired
private ExampleRepository exampleRepository;
I have to implement custom repository class annotated with #Repository which should inherit another class which is annotated #Repository as well.
What is correct implementation of that usecase? Can directly inherit that class and add #Repository to main, or there is another best practice? Actually I have problem when I have defined
#EnableJpaRepositories(basePackages = { "com.example.foo.repositories", "com.example.bar.repositories" }
in #Configuration class in root it doesn't scan my repositories and I can't autowire it.
here is sample of my repository class:
parent repository (third party class):
#Repository
public abstract class ParentRepository {
// ...
}
interface and impl class which are in package com.example.foo.repositories:
public interface IFooRepository {
Foo getFoo();
}
#Repository
public class FooRepository extends ParentRepository implements IFooRepository {
Foo getFoo() {
// ...
}
}
Do you have idea how to fix it and make possible to autowire IFooRepository ?
Thank you in advice.
EDIT:
I find out green bean next to #EnableJpaRepositories and when I click on the bean it redirects me to bar repository, and doesn't show FooRepository Bean. I don't understand because both repositories are identical implemented.
According to the doc for jpa repositories
In the preceding example, Spring is instructed to scan com.acme.repositories and all its subpackages for interfaces extending Repository or one of its subinterfaces. For each interface found, the infrastructure registers the persistence technology-specific FactoryBean to create the appropriate proxies that handle invocations of the query methods.
see
So basicly #EnableJpaRepositories - is the same as xml configuration from the link - it instructs to find classes that extending Repository. In you example you have #Repository annotation - that instructs Spring to translate exceptions. You should includ "com.example.foo.repositories", "com.example.bar.repositories" into components scan. Try #ComponentScan annotation see
Adding the #Primary annotation to your custom repository should autowire it into another class whenever possible by default, even if there are other valid beans for the autowire.
I have this interface:
public interface liteRepository extends CrudRepository<liteEntity, Long>, JpaSpecificationExecutor<liteEntity> {...}
It works, all is well.
However, intellij does not register this class as a spring component. If I annotate this interface with #Component, then intellij recognizes this as a spring bean and I can #Autowire this repository in my integration tests.
My code still works after annotation, but I'm not confident that I am not messing with things that I should not be messing with.
Question:
Is there any harm in adding the #Component annotation to this interface?
The only thing that #Component annotation means is that the class is eligible for becoming a Spring bean during Spring's component-scan.
So, if you want it to be a Spring bean and you did not define it as a Spring bean anywhere else, you can safely add the #Component annotation.
Of course, this will only work if you have the actual component scan configured somewhere(for, example <context:component-scan base-package="..."> in some Spring config file), which I am assuming you already heave, since the bean is properly getting autowired after you add the annotation.
I'm trying to implement transactions on a CrudRepository Interface. I'm a beginner with this and my current problem is that when receiving a lot of requests from different clients, I'm sometimes getting a duplicate.
To avoid that I wanted to use SQL Transactions and their implementation with Spring but I'm unable to get it working.
Here is how I've tried to do it :
#Repository
#EnableTransactionManagement
#Transactional
public interface ApplicationPackageDao extends CrudRepository<ApplicationPackage, Long> {
/**
* Find if a record exists for this package name ,
* #param packageName
* #return
*/
#Transactional
ApplicationPackage findByPackageName(String packageName);
}
However it doesn't seem to work.
I tried to add the #Transactionnal annotations earlier in the Java methods I'm calling but I can't get it working either.
How am I supposed to work with transactions on CrudRepository ?
Or am I using completely the wrong thing?
In addition to crm86's answer some more notes to the #Transactional annotation:
It seems to be best practice to annotate the entry points into your application (e.g. your web controller methods or the main method of a scheduled batch). By using the annotation attribute TxType you can ensure constraints/conditions in methods which are located deeper in your application (e.g. TxType.MANDATORY would throw if no trx-context is running, etc.).
The #Transactional annotation has only an effect if the class is loaded as spring bean (e.g. #Component annotation at class level).
Remember that only RuntimeException's lead to a rollback. If you want a checked Exception leading to a rollback you have to enumerate each such Exception by using the attribute rollbackOn.
The annotation at class level is valid for all public methods of this class. Method level annotations override those at the class level. The repeated annotation in your example above (first at class level, then at method level) has no effect.
What I suggest:
Check your context and configuration classes with #Configuration annotation. From the documentation:
The #EnableTransactionManagement annotation provides equivalent
support if you are using Java based configuration. Simply add the
annotation to a #Configuration class
#EnableTransactionManagement and only looks
for #Transactional on beans in the same application context they are
defined in
Then you could use #Transactional in your service even in a method
Hope it helps