So this is my assignemt, I have to write a function that accepts a number less than 100 and returns the fibonacci element at that position. I don't understand what is wrong with my code. please note that I wrote only getFibonacciElementAt function code
import java.util.Scanner;
public class FibonacciNumber {
public long getFibonacciElementAt(int index) {
Scanner sc= new Scanner(System.in);
System.out.println("Please enter the number");
int n= sc.nextInt();
if(n<0)
return -1;
int a=0;
int b=1;
int i;
for(i=2; i<=n; i++)
{
int temp=a;
a=b;
b=temp;
}
return a;
}
public void printFibonacciElementAt(int index) {
System.out.println(getFibonacciElementAt(index));
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
if (args.length != 1) {
System.out.println("Exactly 1 inputs required.");
return;
}
try {
int num = Integer.parseInt(args[0]);
FibonacciNumber obj = new FibonacciNumber();
obj.printFibonacciElementAt(num);
} catch (NumberFormatException e) {
System.out.println("Only integers allowed.");
}
}
}
Okay, so re-posting a better recursive version using memoization so runtime of n<=100 is less than 1 second:
public static long getFibonacciElementAt(int n, long[] d) {
if (n == 0 || n == 1)
return n;
if (d[n] == 0)
d[n] = getFibonacciElementAt(n - 1, d) + getFibonacciElementAt(n - 2, d);
return d[n];
}
But once you call the method just pass a new array of the size n+1 as the following:
System.out.println(getFibonacciElementAt(n, new long[n+1]));
You are just exchanging, not adding the previous two numbers. So try following:
int a=0;
int b=1;
int temp;
for(int i=2; i<=n; i++)
{
temp=a+b;
a=b;
b=temp;
}
return b;
Related
Actually my aim is to find the super no for eg i will be given 2 values n,k where n=148 and k =3 so i have to form p = 148148148 then add digits of p until i get a single no (ans = 3) this is what i have tried.......
import java.util.*;
public class RecurrsiveDigitSum {
public int check(int n) {
int s = 0;
int d;
while(n>0) {
d = n%10;
s = s+d;
n = n/10;
System.out.println(s);
}
if(s/10 !=0){
check(s);
}
return s;
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
Scanner scan = new Scanner(System.in);
int n = scan.nextInt();
int k = scan.nextInt();
int sum;
RecurrsiveDigitSum obj = new RecurrsiveDigitSum();
sum = obj.check(n);
System.out.println(sum);
sum = sum * k;
System.out.println(sum);
int s1 = obj.check(sum);
System.out.println(s1);
}
}
but the problem here is that even if my s = 4 finally its just returning the first value of s that has been found so pls help me friends
you must put return before recursive calling.
if(s/10 !=0){
return check(s);
}
If you don't put it, the result of calling function will be loss and the result of s will be returned instead of check(s).
I've improved your solution little bit.
public int check(int n) {
int s = 0;
while(n>0) {
s += n%10;
n /= 10;
}
if(s/10 != 0){
return check(s);
}
return s;
}
i am trying to find lcm of n numbers and i want my recursion to run upto the last element, but i cant find an efficient method to limit it from going out of bounds at line 41.
please suggest any trick.
import java.io.*;
class lcm
{
static int x=1,k=1;
public static void main(String args[])throws IOException
{
BufferedReader br=new BufferedReader (new InputStreamReader(System.in));
System.out.println("enter the limit");
int n= Integer.parseInt(br.readLine());
System.out.println("enter the numbers");
int L;
int arr[]=new int[n];
for(int i=0;i<n;i++)
arr[i]=Integer.parseInt(br.readLine());
L=lc( arr[0],arr[1],arr,n);
System.out.println(L);
}
static int lc(int min, int max, int arr[], int n)
{
int fact;
if(x<=n-1 )
{
for(int i=1;i<=min;i++)
{
fact=max*i;
if(fact%min==0)
{
k=fact;
break;
}
}
//System.out.println("values of x"+x);
//System.out.println("values of k"+k);
x++;
return lc(arr[x],k,arr,n);
}
else
{
//System.out.println("vale of x"+x);
return k;
}
}
}
i found a solution though i still want to know if the code i wrote is efficient or not?
static int lc(int min, int max, int arr[], int n)
{
int fact;
if(x<n-1 )
{
for(int i=1;i<=min;i++)
{
fact=max*i;
if(fact%min==0)
{
k=fact;
break;
}
}
System.out.println("values of x"+x);
System.out.println("values of k"+k);
x++;
return lc(arr[x],k,arr,n);
}
else
{
min=arr[x];
max=k;
for(int i=1;i<=min;i++)
{
fact=max*i;
if(fact%min==0)
{
k=fact;
break;
}
}
return k;
}
}
}
I am trying to get all prime factors of a number. The for loop should work until it finds the match and it should break and jump to the next if statement which checks if number is not equal to zero.
public class Factor {
public static ArrayList <Integer> HoldNum = new ArrayList();
public static void main(String[]args){
Factor object = new Factor();
object.Factor(104);
System.out.println(HoldNum.get(0));
}
public static int Factor(int number){
int new_numb = 0;
int n=0;
for( n = 1; n < 9; n++) {
if (number % n == 0) {
HoldNum.add(n);
new_numb = number/n;
break;
}
}
System.out.println(new_numb);
if(new_numb < 0) {
HoldNum.add(new_numb);
return 1;
} else {
return Factor(new_numb);
}
}
}
There are at least three errors :
As okiharaherbst wrote, your counter is not incremented.
you start your loop at 1, so yourval % 1 always equals to 0 and new_numb is always equals to your input val, so you'll loop endlessly on 104.
new_numb will never be lesser than 0.
You asked for a recursive solution. Here you go:
public class Example {
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println(factors(104));
}
public static List<Integer> factors(int number) {
return factors(number, new ArrayList<Integer>());
}
private static List<Integer> factors(int number, List<Integer> primes) {
for (int prim = 2; prim <= number; prim++) {
if (number % prim == 0) {
primes.add(prim);
return factors(number / prim, primes);
}
}
return primes;
}
}
The code is not bullet-proof, it is only a quick-and-dirty example.
Java implementation...
public class PrimeFactor {
public int divisor=2;
void printPrimeFactors(int num)
{
if(num == 1)
return;
if(num%divisor!=0)
{
while(num%divisor!=0)
++divisor;
}
if(num%divisor==0){
System.out.println(divisor);
printPrimeFactors(num/divisor);
}
}
public static void main(String[] args)
{
PrimeFactor obj = new PrimeFactor();
obj.printPrimeFactors(90);
}
}
I'm supposed to write a code which checks if a given number belongs to the Fibonacci sequence. After a few hours of hard work this is what i came up with:
public class TP2 {
/**
* #param args
*/
public static boolean ehFibonacci(int n) {
int fib1 = 0;
int fib2 = 1;
do {
int saveFib1 = fib1;
fib1 = fib2;
fib2 = saveFib1 + fib2;
}
while (fib2 <= n);
if (fib2 == n)
return true;
else
return false;
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
int n = 8;
System.out.println(ehFibonacci(n));
}
}
I must be doing something wrong, because it always returns "false". Any tips on how to fix this?
You continue the loop while fib2 <= n, so when you are out of the loop, fib2 is always > n, and so it returns false.
/**
* #param args
*/
public static boolean ehFibonacci(int n) {
int fib1 = 0;
int fib2 = 1;
do {
int saveFib1 = fib1;
fib1 = fib2;
fib2 = saveFib1 + fib2;
}
while (fib2 < n);
if (fib2 == n)
return true;
else
return false;
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
int n = 5;
System.out.println(ehFibonacci(n));
}
This works. I am not sure about efficiency..but this is a foolproof program,
public class isANumberFibonacci {
public static int fibonacci(int seriesLength) {
if (seriesLength == 1 || seriesLength == 2) {
return 1;
} else {
return fibonacci(seriesLength - 1) + fibonacci(seriesLength - 2);
}
}
public static void main(String args[]) {
int number = 4101;
int i = 1;
while (i > 0) {
int fibnumber = fibonacci(i);
if (fibnumber != number) {
if (fibnumber > number) {
System.out.println("Not fib");
break;
} else {
i++;
}
} else {
System.out.println("The number is fibonacci");
break;
}
}
}
}
you can also use perfect square to check whether your number is Fibonacci or not. you can find the code and some explanation at geeksforgeeks.
you can also see stackexchange for the math behind it.
I'm a beginner but this code runs perfectly fine without any issues. Checked with test cases hopefully it'll solve your query.
public static boolean checkMember(int n) {
int x = 0;
int y = 1;
int sum = 0;
boolean isTrue = true;
for (int i = 1; i <= n; i++) {
x = y;
y = sum;
sum = x + y;
if (sum == n) {
isTrue=true;
break;
} else {
isTrue=false;
}
}
return isTrue;
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
Scanner sc = new Scanner(System.in);
int n = sc.nextInt();
System.out.print(checkMember(n));
}
I'm taking an online class on Algorithms and trying to implement a mergesort implementation of finding the number of inversions in a list of numbers. But, I cant figure what Im doing wrong with my implementation as the number of inversions returned is significantly lower than the number I get while doing a brute force approach. Ive placed my implementation of the mergesort approach below
/**
*
*/
package com.JavaReference;
import java.io.BufferedReader;
import java.io.FileReader;
import java.io.IOException;
public class ReadFile {
public static void main(String args[]){
int count=0;
Integer n[];
int i=0;
try{
n=OpenFile();
int num[] = new int[n.length];
for (i=0;i<n.length;i++){
num[i]=n[i].intValue();
// System.out.println( "Num"+num[i]);
}
count=countInversions(num);
}
catch(IOException e){
e.printStackTrace();
}
System.out.println(" The number of inversions"+count);
}
public static Integer[] OpenFile()throws IOException{
FileReader fr=new FileReader("C:/IntegerArray.txt");// to put in file name.
BufferedReader textR= new BufferedReader(fr);
int nLines=readLines();
System.out.println("Number of lines"+nLines);
Integer[] nData=new Integer[nLines];
for (int i=0; i < nLines; i++) {
nData[ i ] = Integer.parseInt((textR.readLine()));
}
textR.close();
return nData;
}
public static int readLines() throws IOException{
FileReader fr=new FileReader("C:/IntegerArray.txt");
BufferedReader br=new BufferedReader(fr);
int numLines=0;
//String aLine;
while(br.readLine()!=null){
numLines++;
}
System.out.println("Number of lines readLines"+numLines);
return numLines;
}
public static int countInversions(int num[]){
int countLeft,countRight,countMerge;
int mid=num.length/2,k;
if (num.length<=1){
return 0;// Number of inversions will be zero for an array of this size.
}
int left[]=new int[mid];
int right[]=new int [num.length-mid];
for (k=0;k<mid;k++){
left[k]=num[k];
}
for (k=0;k<mid;k++){
right[k]=num[mid+k];
}
countLeft=countInversions(left);
countRight=countInversions(right);
int[] result=new int[num.length];
countMerge=mergeAndCount(left,right,result);
/*
* Assign it back to original array.
*/
for (k=0;k<num.length;k++){
num[k]=result[k];
}
return(countLeft+countRight+countMerge);
}
private static int mergeAndCount(int left[],int right[],int result[]){
int count=0;
int a=0,b=0,i,k=0;
while((a<left.length)&&(b<right.length)){
if(left[a]<right[b]){
result[k]=left[a++];// No inversions in this case.
}
else{// There are inversions.
result[k]=right[b++];
count+=left.length-a;
}
k++;
// When we finish iterating through a.
if(a==left.length){
for (i=b;i<right.length;i++){
result[k++]=right[b];
}
}
else{
for (i=a;i<left.length;i++){
}
}
}
return count;
}
}
I'm a beginner in Java and Algorithms so any insightful suggestions would be great!
I found two bugs:
In countInversions(), when num is split into left and right you assume right has m elements. When num.length is odd, however, it will be m + 1 elements. The solution is to use right.length instead of m.
In mergeAndCount(), handling of the bit where one subarray is empty and the other one still has some elements is not done correctly.
Side note:
There is absolutely no reason to use Integer in your program, except for the Integer.parseInt() method (which, by the way, returns an int).
Corrected code:
/**
*
*/
package com.JavaReference;
import java.io.BufferedReader;
import java.io.FileReader;
import java.io.IOException;
public class ReadFile {
public static void main(String args[]){
int count=0;
Integer n[];
int i=0;
try{
n=OpenFile();
int num[] = new int[n.length];
for (i=0;i<n.length;i++){
num[i]=n[i].intValue();
// System.out.println( "Num"+num[i]);
}
count=countInversions(num);
}
catch(IOException e){
e.printStackTrace();
}
System.out.println(" The number of inversions"+count);
}
public static Integer[] OpenFile()throws IOException{
FileReader fr=new FileReader("C:/IntegerArray.txt");// to put in file name.
BufferedReader textR= new BufferedReader(fr);
int nLines=readLines();
System.out.println("Number of lines"+nLines);
Integer[] nData=new Integer[nLines];
for (int i=0; i < nLines; i++) {
nData[ i ] = Integer.parseInt((textR.readLine()));
}
textR.close();
return nData;
}
public static int readLines() throws IOException{
FileReader fr=new FileReader("C:/IntegerArray.txt");
BufferedReader br=new BufferedReader(fr);
int numLines=0;
//String aLine;
while(br.readLine()!=null){
numLines++;
}
System.out.println("Number of lines readLines"+numLines);
return numLines;
}
public static int countInversions(int num[]){
int countLeft,countRight,countMerge;
int mid=num.length/2,k;
if (num.length<=1){
return 0;// Number of inversions will be zero for an array of this size.
}
int left[]=new int[mid];
int right[]=new int [num.length-mid];
for (k=0;k<mid;k++){
left[k]=num[k];
}
// BUG 1: you can't assume right.length == m
for (k=0;k<right.length;k++){
right[k]=num[mid+k];
}
countLeft=countInversions(left);
countRight=countInversions(right);
int[] result=new int[num.length];
countMerge=mergeAndCount(left,right,result);
/*
* Assign it back to original array.
*/
for (k=0;k<num.length;k++){
num[k]=result[k];
}
return(countLeft+countRight+countMerge);
}
private static int mergeAndCount(int left[],int right[],int result[]){
int count=0;
int a=0,b=0,i,k=0;
while((a<left.length)&&(b<right.length)){
if(left[a]<right[b]){
result[k]=left[a++];// No inversions in this case.
}
else{// There are inversions.
result[k]=right[b++];
count+=left.length-a;
}
k++;
}
// BUG 2: Merging of leftovers should be done like this
while (a < left.length)
{
result[k++] = left[a++];
}
while (b < right.length)
{
result[k++] = right[b++];
}
return count;
}
}
The way I see it, counting the number of inversions in an array is finding a way to sort the array in an ascending order. Following that thought, here is my solution:
int countInversionArray(int[] A) {
if(A.length<=1) return 0;
int solution = 0;
for(int i=1;i<A.length;i++){
int j = i;
while(j+2<A.length && A[j] > A[j+1]){
invert2(j,j+1,A);
solution++;
j++;
}
j=i;
while(j>0 && A[j] < A[j-1]){
invert2(j,j-1,A);
solution++;
j--;
}
}
return solution;
}
private void invert2(int index1, int index2, int[] A){
int temp = A[index1];
A[index1] = A[index2];
A[index2] = temp;
}
I found a rigth solution in Robert Sedgewick book "Algorithms on java language"
Read here about merge
See java code for counting of inversion
You can try this In-Place Mergesort implemention on java. But minimum 1 temporary data container is needed (ArrayList in this case). Also counts inversions.
///
Sorter.java
public interface Sorter {
public void sort(Object[] data);
public void sort(Object[] data, int startIndex, int len);
}
MergeSorter implementation class (others like QuickSorter, BubbleSorter or InsertionSorter may be implemented on Sorter interface)
MergeSorter.java
import java.util.List;
import java.util.ArrayList;
public class MergeSorter implements Sorter {
private List<Comparable> dataList;
int num_inversion;
public MergeSorter() {
dataList = new ArrayList<Comparable> (500);
num_inversion = 0;
}
public void sort(Object[] data) {
sort(data, 0, data.length);
}
public int counting() {
return num_inversion;
}
public void sort(Object[] data, int start, int len) {
if (len <= 1) return;
else {
int midlen = len / 2;
sort(data, start, midlen);
sort(data, midlen + start, len - midlen);
merge(data, start, midlen, midlen + start, len - midlen);
}
}
private void merge(Object[] data, int start1, int len1, int start2, int len2) {
dataList.clear();
int len = len1 + len2;
// X is left array pointer
// Y is right array pointer
int x = start1, y = start2;
int end1 = len1 + start1 - 1;
int end2 = len2 + start2 - 1;
while (x <= end1 && y <= end2) {
Comparable obj1 = (Comparable) data[x];
Comparable obj2 = (Comparable) data[y];
Comparable<?> smallobject = null;
if (obj1.compareTo(obj2) < 0) {
smallobject = obj1;
x++;
}
else {
smallobject = obj2;
y++;
num_inversion += (end1 - x + 1);
}
dataList.add(smallobject);
}
while (x <= end1) {
dataList.add((Comparable)data[x++]);
}
while (y <= end2) {
dataList.add((Comparable)data[y++]);
}
for (int n = start1, i = 0; n <= end2; n++, i++) {
data[n] = dataList.get(i);
}
}
}
For testing, create a driver class and type the main method
public static void main(String[] args) {
Object[] data = ...............
Sorter sorter = new MergeSorter();
sorter.sort(data)
for (Object x : data) {
System.out.println(x);
}
System.out.println("Counting invertion: " + ((MergeSorter)sorter).counting());
}