We Keep Coding

Hiding Multiple Elements in JTable via ButtonClick

I am currently working on a tool which edits data dynamically in a JTable. I want to hide the targeted row whenever a button is clicked. Right now I am using RowFilter. Whenever the button isClicked, a new filter is created:
RowFilter<MyTableModel, Object> rowFilter = null;
try {
rowFilter = RowFilter.notFilter(RowFilter.regexFilter(((String)dataTable.getValueAt(dataTable.getSelectedRow(), 0)),0));
} catch (java.util.regex.PatternSyntaxException e) {
return;
}
sorter.setRowFilter(rowFilter);
This only works for one element each time the button is clicked. I want to stay them hidden, so you can continously hide elemtens in the table. It is important to mention that I do not want to delete the rows, just hide them.
I hope someone has an easy answer for this, looking for quite a while now.

This method sorter.setRowFilter(rowFilter); is replacing the filter every time you "add" a new filter. So, it's "forgetting" the old rules. What you have to do is edit the existing filter to include the new rules for filtering.
Check out the documentation for more details.
In any case, I extracted a part of the documentation which you should try to implement.
From RowFilter Javadoc:
Subclasses must override the include method to indicate whether the
entry should be shown in the view. The Entry argument can be used to
obtain the values in each of the columns in that entry. The following
example shows an include method that allows only entries containing
one or more values starting with the string "a":
RowFilter<Object,Object> startsWithAFilter = new RowFilter<Object,Object>() {
public boolean include(Entry<? extends Object, ? extends Object> entry) {
for (int i = entry.getValueCount() - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
if (entry.getStringValue(i).startsWith("a")) {
// The value starts with "a", include it
return true;
}
}
// None of the columns start with "a"; return false so that this
// entry is not shown
return false;
}
};
This means that the include() method is going to return true or false depending if an item should be shown.
Therefore, you should only set the RowFilter once, and reimplment the include() method to match all the rules you currently have set upon your view.

JavaFx use String with Double on table column

I have a class called "Product", with a double attribute "price". I'm showing it on a table column inside a table view, but i wanted to show the price formatted -- "US$ 20.00" instead of just "20.00".
Here's my code for populating the table view:
priceProductColumn.setCellValueFactory(cellData -> cellData.getValue().priceProperty());
I tried everything: convert the returned value to a string, using the method toString that priceProperty has, etc, but not seems to work.
Do i need to bind an event of something like that?

Use the cellValueFactory as you have it to determine the data that is displayed. The cell value factory is basically a function that takes a CellDataFeatures object and returns an ObservableValue wrapping up the value to be displayed in the table cell. You usually want to call getValue() on the CellDataFeatures object to get the value for the row, and then retrieve a property from it, exactly as you do in your posted code.
Use a cellFactory to determine how to display those data. The cellFactory is a function that takes a TableColumn (which you usually don't need) and returns a TableCell object. Typically you return a subclass of TableCell that override the updateItem() method to set the text (and sometimes the graphic) for the cell, based on the new value it is displaying. In your case you get the price as a Number, and just need to format it as you require and pass the formatted value to the cell's setText(...) method.
It's worth reading the relevant Javadocs: TableColumn.cellFactoryProperty(), and also Cell for a general discussion of cells and cell factories.
priceProductColumn.setCellValueFactory(cellData -> cellData.getValue().priceProperty());
priceProductColumn.setCellFactory(col ->
new TableCell<Product, Number>() {
#Override
public void updateItem(Number price, boolean empty) {
super.updateItem(price, empty);
if (empty) {
setText(null);
} else {
setText(String.format("US$%.2f", price.doubleValue()));
}
}
});
(I'm assuming priceProductColumn is a TableColumn<Product, Number> and Product.priceProperty() returns a DoubleProperty.)

If you have not, read this together with #James_D post.
https://docs.oracle.com/javafx/2/ui_controls/table-view.htm

How to hide TableView column header in JavaFX 8?

I need to have an observable list of a type that will be displayed in a TableView with one single column, that when selected will display the rest of its information on the right. The TableView is wrapped in a TitledPane, which is wrapped in an Accordion. See image below:
As you can see in this scenario I don't want to show the Column Header.
I tried following the instruction here, which leads to here:
Pane header = (Pane) list.lookup("TableHeaderRow");
header.setMaxHeight(0);
header.setMinHeight(0);
header.setPrefHeight(0);
header.setVisible(false);
However, it appears to not be working for JavaFX 8. The lookup("TableHeaderRow") method returns null which makes me think that the "TableHeaderRow" selector no longer exist.
Is there an updated workaround for removing/hiding the table header in JavaFX 8?

I faced the problem of hiding column headers recently and could solve it using css.
I created a styleclass:
.noheader .column-header-background {
-fx-max-height: 0;
-fx-pref-height: 0;
-fx-min-height: 0;
}
and added it to the TableView:
tableView.getStyleClass().add("noheader");
Just in case someone needs an alternative approach. It also gives the flexibility of toggling column headers.

As observed in the comments, lookups do not work until after CSS has been applied to a node, which is typically on the first frame rendering that displays the node. Your suggested solution works fine as long as you execute the code you have posted after the table has been displayed.
For a better approach in this case, a single-column "table" without a header is just a ListView. The ListView has a cell rendering mechanism that is similar to that used for TableColumns (but is simpler as you don't have to worry about multiple columns). I would use a ListView in your scenario, instead of hacking the css to make the header disappear:
ListView<Album> albumList = new ListView<>();
albumList.setCellFactory((ListView<Album> lv) ->
new ListCell<Album>() {
#Override
public void updateItem(Album album, boolean empty) {
super.updateItem(album, empty);
if (empty) {
setText(null);
} else {
// use whatever data you need from the album
// object to get the correct displayed value:
setText(album.getTitle());
}
}
}
);
albumList.getSelectionModel().selectedItemProperty()
.addListener((ObservableValue<? extends Album> obs, Album oldAlbum, Album selectedAlbum) -> {
if (selectedAlbum != null) {
// do something with selectedAlbum
}
);

There's no need for CSS or style or skin manipulation. Simply make a subclass of TableView and override resize, like this
class XTableView extends TableView {
#Override
public void resize(double width, double height) {
super.resize(width, height);
Pane header = (Pane) lookup("TableHeaderRow");
header.setMinHeight(0);
header.setPrefHeight(0);
header.setMaxHeight(0);
header.setVisible(false);
}
}
This works fine as of June 2017 in Java 8.

Also, I would recommend using this nowadays.
tableView.skinProperty().addListener((a, b, newSkin) -> {
TableHeaderRow headerRow = ((TableViewSkinBase)
newSkin).getTableHeaderRow();
...
});
This can be executed during initialization, the other method as mention above, will return null, if run during initialization.

Combining the last two answers for a more generic solution without the need to override methods because getTableHeaderRow is no longer visible to be accessed. Tested with Java 11:
private void hideHeaders() {
table.skinProperty().addListener((a, b, newSkin) ->
{
Pane header = (Pane) table.lookup("TableHeaderRow");
header.setMinHeight(0);
header.setPrefHeight(0);
header.setMaxHeight(0);
header.setVisible(false);
});
}

Issue with default Sorting on Virtual Table & ViewerComparator

We have a Virtual Table in my Eclipse RCP application. We make a call to the backend to retrieve the data to be populated in the virtual table.
We want default sorting on the table on a single column. We use ViewerComparator to achieve sorting functionality. My problem is, I am not able to get this sorting working when the table loads with the data for the 1st time. But when I click on the column, everything works fine as expected.
This is how, I set the Comparator to the column
TableViewerColumn tvc = viewer.addColumn(100, SWT.LEFT, "Name");
viewer.setColumnComparator(tvc,
new Comparator<Person>() {
#Override
public int compare(Person o1,Person o2) {
double firstValue = Double.parseDouble(o1
.getAge());
double secondValue = Double.parseDouble(o2
.getAge());
return firstValue > secondValue ? 1 : -1;
}
});
setColumnComparator method in custom viewer
public void setColumnComparator(TableViewerColumn tvc, Comparator<T> cmp){
final MyViewerComparator c = new MyViewerComparator(cmp);
final TableColumn tc = tvc.getColumn();
setComparator(c);
getTable().setSortDirection(c.getDirection());
getTable().setSortColumn(tc);
refresh();
tc.addSelectionListener(new SelectionAdapter() {
#Override
public void widgetSelected(SelectionEvent e) {
<same code as above>
}
});
MyViewerComparator
class MyViewerComparator extends ViewerComparator{
Comparator<T> cmp;
boolean desc = true;
MyViewerComparator(Comparator<T> cmp){
this.cmp = cmp;
}
int getDirection(){
return desc?SWT.UP:SWT.DOWN;
}
void flipDirection(){
desc = !desc;
}
#Override
public int compare(Viewer viewer, Object e1, Object e2) {
if(e1 == null || e2==null){
return 0;
}
int rc = cmp.compare((T)e1, (T)e2);
if(desc)
return -rc;
return rc;
}
}
When the table loads the data for the 1st time, it goes inside the Bolded condition in the above code as one of the object is ALWAYS NULL
Note: This functionality works totally fine if I use a Standard table rather than VIRTUAL TABLE. I am not sure whether I can change it to use Standard table as we want the lazy load functionality as well..
ContentProvider used is: ObservableListContentProvider
Please advise..

A late answer that hopefully still helps others. I encountered exactly the same problem when using SWT.VIRTUAL with an ObservableListContentProvider in combination with sorting.
The original intent of SWT.VIRTUAL is that not all elements in the contents need to be fetched to show only part of the contents. A custom content provider needs to be implemented which only has to return the elements that need to be currently shown on the screen. You also have to tell the table the total number of elements in existence. In such a use case, a table cannot be sorted in the normal way with a ViewerComparator because not all elements are known. However SWT.VIRTUAL can also be used as a performance optimization for rendering a table with many elements. This seems to work fine with the non-observable ArrayContentProvider.
But when using ObservableListContentProvider I am seeing exactly the same issue as you have. Somehow it tries to be smart and update only the elements that have actually changed. Somewhere in the depths of it's implementation something goes wrong for virtual tables, I have no clue exactly what. But I do have a solution: don't use ObservableListContentProvider at all and simply refresh the table viewer. You can e.g. use a plain ArrayContentProvider and add the following listener to the IObservableList contents of the viewer:
new IListChangeListener() {
#Override
public void handleListChange(ListChangeEvent event) {
viewer.refresh();
}
};
I actually implemented my own "SimpleObservableListContentProvider" that does exactly this, but also takes care of switching table input by implementing the inputChanged method to remove this listener from the old input list and add it to the new one.

How to remove previous attributeModifier when new attributeModifier is added?

I have two columns which are orderbyborder links. When i click one column i changed the color of column by adding attributeModifier in the following way
add(new AttributeModifier("style", true, new Model<String>("background-color:#80b6ed;")));
This works fine. But when i click on second column, the first column remains the changed color. But I expect only the column which i click should hold this attributeModifier!

You shouldn't change the modifier.
The trick is to have your model return the correct value. So instead of using new Model<String>("background-color:#80b6ed;"), which always returns the same constant value, you'd have something like:
new Model<String>() {
#Override
public String getObject() {
if( columnName.equals( selectedColumn ) { //or something along these lines, to check if the current column is the selected one
return "background-color:#80b6ed;";
}
return "background-color:white;";
}
}
And of course this also means you can add an attribute modifier to every column when you create them and don't have to worry about them later on.

Another way to achieve what you want is to add a css class to the selected line via Javascript (removing the class from old one).