We Keep Coding

Graphql java spring boot -- Scalar type error -- There is no scalar implementation for the named 'XXX' scalar type

I want to make scalar type it will report an error
Even I use extended-scalars, It did not work at all.
Version:
spring-boot: 2.7.0
<dependency>
<groupId>com.graphql-java-kickstart</groupId>
<artifactId>graphql-spring-boot-starter</artifactId>
<version>12.0.0</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.graphql-java-kickstart</groupId>
<artifactId>graphql-java-tools</artifactId>
<version>12.0.0</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.graphql-java</groupId>
<artifactId>graphiql-spring-boot-starter</artifactId>
<version>5.0.2</version>
</dependency>
Code
#Configuration
public class Conf {
#Bean
public GraphQLScalarType graphQLLong() {
return ExtendedScalars.GraphQLLong;
}
}
Caused by: SchemaProblem{errors=[There is no scalar implementation for the named 'Long' scalar type]}
Schema structure (a very simple one)
scalar Long
type Mutation {
}
yml config
So what config was I lost?

Include graphql-java-extended-scalars dependency:
https://github.com/graphql-java/graphql-java-extended-scalars
And make sure in your #Configuration class you are using:
#Bean
public graphql.schema.GraphQLScalarType extendedScalarLong() {
return graphql.scalars.ExtendedScalars.GraphQLLong;
}
Also, if you are defining your ExtendedScalar as a #Bean, then there's no need to specify it in graphql.extended-scalars property.

Use this :
#Bean
public RuntimeWiringConfigurer runtimeWiringConfigurer() {
return wiringBuilder -> wiringBuilder.scalar(ExtendedScalars.GraphQLLong);
}
Instead of :
#Bean
public GraphQLScalarType graphQLLong() {
return ExtendedScalars.GraphQLLong;
}

returning all result using spring-data-rest

I am following spring data rest from https://spring.io/guides/gs/accessing-data-rest/ and I am only using
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-data-jpa</artifactId>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-data-rest</artifactId>
</dependency>
I would like to know how can I return all records (without pagination) but not using spring-boot-starter-web.I wants to keep my code as small as possible.
I tried following but it is not working
#RepositoryRestResource(collectionResourceRel = "people" , path = "people")
public interface PersonRepository extends PagingAndSortingRepository<Person, Long> {
List<Person> findAllByLastName(#Param("name") String name);
default List<Person> findAll(){
Pageable pageable = null;
return (List<Person>) this.findAll(pageable);
};
}
I mean if I have whole MVC, I can do it but I like to keep my code to minimum.

Spring Data REST is itself a Spring MVC application and is designed in
such a way that it should integrate with your existing Spring MVC
applications with little effort. An existing (or future) layer of
services can run alongside Spring Data REST with only minor additional
work.
If you are using current version of spring boot, there is no need to mark your repository with #RepositoryRestResource; also spring will auto-configure Spring Data Rest once it found the spring-data-rest dependency in your path, bellow you will find steps with minimum config :
In pom.xml :
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-data-rest</artifactId>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-data-jpa</artifactId>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.h2database</groupId>
<artifactId>h2</artifactId>
</dependency>
Define your Entity + Repository :
Order.java
#Entity(name = "SampleOrder")
#Data
public class Order {
#Id #GeneratedValue//
private Long id;
private String name;
}
OrderRepository.java
public interface OrderRepository extends CrudRepository<Order, Long> {
}
Application.java
#SpringBootApplication
public class Application {
public static void main(String[] args) {
SpringApplication.run(Application.class, args);
}
}
Test your API :
curl http://localhost:8080
< HTTP/1.1 200 OK
< Content-Type: application/hal+json
{ "_links" : {
"orders" : {
"href" : "http://localhost:8080/orders"
}
}
}

As #abdelghani-roussi shows, you can use the CrudRepository instead of the PagingAndSortingRepository, e.g.:
public interface PersonRepository extends CrudRepository<Person, Long> {
List<Person> findAllByLastName(#Param("name") String name);
// don't need to define findAll(), it's defined by CrudRepository
}
and then the default findAll() method will return a List<Person> that isn't paged.
Note: as I mentioned in my comment, by including the dependency on spring-boot-starter-data-rest you are also pulling in the Web dependencies, so you can't avoid that.

jackson - jackson not creating json for nested objects

I have a user list class and an API that returns user list and total records.
The class is as follows :
#JsonInclude(JsonInclude.Include.NON_NULL)
public class FMSResponseInfo {
#JsonProperty("status")
private String status;
#JsonProperty("message")
private String message;
#JsonProperty("data")
private Object data;
#JsonProperty("status")
public String getStatus() {
return status;
}
#JsonProperty("status")
public void setStatus(String status) {
this.status = status;
}
#JsonProperty("message")
public String getMessage() {
return message;
}
#JsonProperty("message")
public void setMessage(String message) {
this.message = message;
}
#JsonProperty("data")
public Object getData() {
return data;
}
#JsonProperty("data")
public void setData(Object data) {
this.data = data;
}
}
#JsonInclude(JsonInclude.Include.NON_NULL)
public class UserListResDTO {
#JsonProperty("users")
private List<UserDTO> users;
#JsonProperty("totalRecords")
private long totalRecords;
public List<UserDTO> getUsers() {
return users;
}
public void setUsers(List<UserDTO> users) {
this.users = users;
}
public long getTotalRecords() {
return totalRecords;
}
public void setTotalRecords(long totalRecords) {
this.totalRecords = totalRecords;
}
}
I am setting an object of type UserListResDTO in FMSResponseInfo as shown below.
I have been successful in creating web services and returning response as json, so far. But the problem I am facing is that the API returns the response as follows :
{"data":"org.package.UserListResDTO#70783307","message":"Success","status":"200"}
And this is how I have written the web service :
#Path("/getUsers")
#GET
#Produces(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
public FMSResponseInfo getUsers(#QueryParam("page") #DefaultValue("0") int page) {
System.out.println("In getUsers()");
FMSResponseInfo fmsResponseInfo = new FMSResponseInfo();
try {
UserListResDTO userList = fmsUserManager.getAllUsers(page);
fmsResponseInfo.setData(userList);
fmsResponseInfo.setStatus(FMSErrorMessageEnum.SUCCESS_CODE.getValue());
fmsResponseInfo.setMessage(FMSErrorMessageEnum.SUCCESS_MESSAGE.getValue());
} catch (Exception e) {
return FMSUtil.getErrorResponseInfo(FMSErrorMessageEnum.INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR_CODE.getValue(),
e.getMessage());
}
System.out.println("Out getUsers()");
return fmsResponseInfo;
}
I guess there is some problem with the dependencies or something that I am unable to resolve. Major dependencies in my pom are :
<dependency>
<groupId>javax.servlet</groupId>
<artifactId>javax.servlet-api</artifactId>
<version>3.1.0</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.glassfish.jersey.containers</groupId>
<artifactId>jersey-container-servlet</artifactId>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.fasterxml.jackson.core</groupId>
<artifactId>jackson-core</artifactId>
<version>2.7.2</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.fasterxml.jackson.core</groupId>
<artifactId>jackson-databind</artifactId>
<version>2.7.2</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.glassfish.jersey.media</groupId>
<artifactId>jersey-media-moxy</artifactId>
</dependency>
and I am creating Web services by extending Application class as follow :
#ApplicationPath("rest")
public class FMSApplication extends Application {
public Set<Class<?>> getClasses(){
Set<Class<?>> set = new HashSet<Class<?>>();
set.add(FMSUserManagerWebService.class);
set.add(FMSDocumentManagerWebService.class);
set.add(FMSInboxManagerWebService.class);
set.add(FMSLocationManagerWebService.class);
return set;
}
}
Any help will be really appreciated as I am new to this REST web services and have been stuck for quite long.

This link will explain the answer
https://jersey.java.net/documentation/latest/media.html#d0e7963
9.1.1.1. POJO support
POJO support represents the easiest way to convert your Java Objects
to JSON and back.
Media modules that support this approach are MOXy and Jackson
The link to Jackson includes
9.1.4.1. Dependency
To use Jackson 2.x as your JSON provider you need to add
jersey-media-json-jackson module to your pom.xml file
<dependency>
<groupId>org.glassfish.jersey.media</groupId>
<artifactId>jersey-media-json-jackson</artifactId>
<version>2.22.2</version>
</dependency>
I don't know much about moxy but you had jackson on your CLASSPATH and were using Jackson annonations. Jersey however was configured to use moxy.
From link
JSON binding support via MOXy is a default and preferred way of
supporting JSON binding in your Jersey applications since Jersey 2.0.
When JSON MOXy module is on the class-path, Jersey will automatically
discover the module and seamlessly enable JSON binding support via
MOXy in your applications.
MOXy seemed to have handled FMSResponseInfo. Why it didn't handle the other object I do not know. But since you wanted to use Jackson you should have been using the Jackson module.

As suggested by Shire Resident in the comments using the following dependency I was able to resolve the problem :
<dependency>
<groupId>org.glassfish.jersey.media</groupId>
<artifactId>jersey-media-json-jackson</artifactId>
<version>2.22.2</version>
</dependency>

Jersey + Jetty + JSON

I would like to produce an JSON using Jetty + Jersey.
My POM.XML is similar to this post: How do I update example to work with latest versions Jetty (9.1.0.RC2) and Jersey (2.7)?. I imagine that i am missing some dependecy. The result from inferFile() is returning blank.
I can see that the method toStirng from Student class was not been called.
Maven
<dependency>
<groupId>org.eclipse.jetty</groupId>
<artifactId>jetty-server</artifactId>
<version>9.1.3.v20140225</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.eclipse.jetty</groupId>
<artifactId>jetty-servlet</artifactId>
<version>9.1.3.v20140225</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.glassfish.jersey.core</groupId>
<artifactId>jersey-server</artifactId>
<version>2.14</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.glassfish.jersey.containers</groupId>
<artifactId>jersey-container-servlet-core</artifactId>
<version>2.14</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.glassfish.jersey.containers</groupId>
<artifactId>jersey-container-jetty-http</artifactId>
<version>2.14</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.glassfish.jersey.media</groupId>
<artifactId>jersey-media-moxy</artifactId>
<version>2.14</version>
</dependency>
Java
public class Student {
public Student(){
}
#Override
public String toString(){
return new StringBuffer(" First Name : ").append("MY FIRST NAME").toString();
}
}
#Path("/bulkload")
public class BulkLoadAPI {
#POST
#Path("inference")
#Consumes(MediaType.TEXT_PLAIN)
#Produces(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
public Student inferFile() throws URISyntaxException, IOException {
Student s = new Student();
return s;
}
}
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
ServletHolder jerseyServlet = new ServletHolder(ServletContainer.class);
jerseyServlet.setInitParameter("jersey.config.server.provider.classnames", "service.api.BulkLoadAPI");
jerseyServlet.setInitParameter("com.sun.jersey.api.json.POJOMappingFeature", "true");
Server server = new Server(10500);
ServletContextHandler context = new ServletContextHandler (server, "/", Servl etContextHandler.SESSIONS);
context.addServlet(jerseyServlet, "/*");
server.start();
server.join();
}

I'm not really sure what you're expecting. If you're expecting toString() to be called (which it isn't), that wouldn't even produce valid JSON. The way POJO to JSON (and vice versa) conversion is done is through MessageBodyReaders and MessageBodyWriters. Basically they are looking for fields with either some form of annotation known to the marshaller/unmarshaller, or Java bean style getters and setters. That's how the data/properties for the JSON will be discovered.
For example, if your Student looked like
public class Student {
private String firstName;
public String getFirstName() {
return firstName;
}
public void setFirstName(String firstName) {
this.firstName = firstName;
}
}
it would give you JSON like {"firstName":"MyFirstName"}. You just need to set the property
public Student inferFile() throws URISyntaxException, IOException {
Student s = new Student();
s.setFirstName("MyFirstNaem");
return s;
}
Another thing, this is not needed
setInitParameter("com.sun.jersey.api.json.POJOMappingFeature","true");
That is a Jersey 1 feature. You are using Jersey 2. See also
jersey.config.server.provider.packages
So you don't have to configure each class individually. The value should be a package. It will scan the package and sub packages for annotated classes.

How to pass variables between cucumber-jvm steps

To pass variables between steps I have the step methods belong to the same class, and use fields of the class for the passed information.
Here is an example as follows:
Feature: Demo
Scenario: Create user
Given User creation form management
When Create user with name "TEST"
Then User is created successfully
Java class with steps definitions:
public class CreateUserSteps {
private String userName;
#Given("^User creation form management$")
public void User_creation_form_management() throws Throwable {
// ...
}
#When("^Create user with name \"([^\"]*)\"$")
public void Create_user_with_name(String userName) throws Throwable {
//...
this.userName = userName;
}
#Then("^User is created successfully$")
public void User_is_created_successfully() throws Throwable {
// Assert if exists an user with name equals to this.userName
}
My question is if it is a good practice to share information between steps? Or would be better to define the feature as:
Then User with name "TEST" is created successfully

In order to share commonalities between steps you need to use a World. In Java it is not as clear as in Ruby.
Quoting the creator of Cucumber.
The purpose of a "World" is twofold:
Isolate state between scenarios.
Share data between step definitions and hooks within a scenario.
How this is implemented is language specific. For example, in ruby,
the implicit self variable inside a step definition points to the
current scenario's World object. This is by default an instance of
Object, but it can be anything you want if you use the World hook.
In Java, you have many (possibly connected) World objects.
The equivalent of the World in Cucumber-Java is all of the objects
with hook or stepdef annotations. In other words, any class with
methods annotated with #Before, #After, #Given and so on will be
instantiated exactly once for each scenario.
This achieves the first goal. To achieve the second goal you have two
approaches:
a) Use a single class for all of your step definitions and hooks
b) Use several classes divided by responsibility [1] and use dependency
injection [2] to connect them to each other.
Option a) quickly breaks down because your step definition code
becomes a mess. That's why people tend to use b).
[1] https://cucumber.io/docs/gherkin/step-organization/
[2] PicoContainer, Spring, Guice, Weld, OpenEJB, Needle
The available Dependency Injection modules are:
cucumber-picocontainer
cucumber-guice
cucumber-openejb
cucumber-spring
cucumber-weld
cucumber-needle
Original post here https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/cukes/8ugcVreXP0Y.
Hope this helps.

It's fine to share data between steps defined within a class using an instance variable. If you need to share data between steps in different classes you should look at the DI integrations (PicoContainer is the simplest).
In the example you show, I'd ask whether showing "TEST" in the scenario is necessary at all. The fact that the user is called TEST is an incidental detail and makes the scenario less readable. Why not generate a random name (or hard code something) in Create_user_with_name()?

In Pure java, I just use a Singleton object that gets created once and cleared after tests.
public class TestData_Singleton {
private static TestData_Singleton myself = new TestData_Singleton();
private TestData_Singleton(){ }
public static TestData_Singleton getInstance(){
if(myself == null){
myself = new TestData_Singleton();
}
return myself;
}
public void ClearTestData(){
myself = new TestData_Singleton();
}

I would say that there are reasons to share information between steps, but I don't think that's the case in this scenario. If you propagate the user name via the test steps then it's not really clear from the feature what's going on. I think it's better to specifically say in the scenario what is expected. I would probably do something like this:
Feature: Demo
Scenario: Create user
Given User creation form management
When Create user with name "TEST"
Then A user named "TEST" has been created
Then, your actual test steps might look something like:
#When("^Create user with name \"([^\"]*)\"$")
public void Create_user_with_name(String userName) throws Throwable {
userService.createUser(userName);
}
#Then("^A user named \"([^\"]*)\" has been created$")
public void User_is_created_successfully(String userName) throws Throwable {
assertNotNull(userService.getUser(userName));
}

Here my way: I define a custom Scenario-Scope with spring
every new scenario there will be a fresh context
Feature #Dummy
Scenario: zweites Scenario
When Eins
Then Zwei
1: Use spring
<properties>
<cucumber.version>1.2.5</cucumber.version>
<junit.version>4.12</junit.version>
</properties>
<!-- cucumber section -->
<dependency>
<groupId>info.cukes</groupId>
<artifactId>cucumber-java</artifactId>
<version>${cucumber.version}</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>info.cukes</groupId>
<artifactId>cucumber-junit</artifactId>
<version>${cucumber.version}</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>junit</groupId>
<artifactId>junit</artifactId>
<version>${junit.version}</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>info.cukes</groupId>
<artifactId>cucumber-spring</artifactId>
<version>${cucumber.version}</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<!-- end cucumber section -->
<!-- spring-stuff -->
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-test</artifactId>
<version>4.3.4.RELEASE</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-context</artifactId>
<version>4.3.4.RELEASE</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-tx</artifactId>
<version>4.3.4.RELEASE</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-core</artifactId>
<version>4.3.4.RELEASE</version>
<scope>test</scope>
<exclusions>
<exclusion>
<groupId>commons-logging</groupId>
<artifactId>commons-logging</artifactId>
</exclusion>
</exclusions>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-beans</artifactId>
<version>4.3.4.RELEASE</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.ws</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-ws-core</artifactId>
<version>2.4.0.RELEASE</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
2: build custom scope class
import org.springframework.context.annotation.Scope;
import org.springframework.stereotype.Component;
#Component
#Scope(scopeName="scenario")
public class ScenarioContext {
public Scenario getScenario() {
return scenario;
}
public void setScenario(Scenario scenario) {
this.scenario = scenario;
}
public String shareMe;
}
3: usage in stepdef
#ContextConfiguration(classes = { CucumberConfiguration.class })
public class StepdefsAuskunft {
private static Logger logger = Logger.getLogger(StepdefsAuskunft.class.getName());
#Autowired
private ApplicationContext applicationContext;
// Inject service here : The impl-class need #Primary #Service
// #Autowired
// IAuskunftservice auskunftservice;
public ScenarioContext getScenarioContext() {
return (ScenarioContext) applicationContext.getBean(ScenarioContext.class);
}
#Before
public void before(Scenario scenario) {
ConfigurableListableBeanFactory beanFactory = ((GenericApplicationContext) applicationContext).getBeanFactory();
beanFactory.registerScope("scenario", new ScenarioScope());
ScenarioContext context = applicationContext.getBean(ScenarioContext.class);
context.setScenario(scenario);
logger.fine("Context für Scenario " + scenario.getName() + " erzeugt");
}
#After
public void after(Scenario scenario) {
ScenarioContext context = applicationContext.getBean(ScenarioContext.class);
logger.fine("Context für Scenario " + scenario.getName() + " gelöscht");
}
#When("^Eins$")
public void eins() throws Throwable {
System.out.println(getScenarioContext().getScenario().getName());
getScenarioContext().shareMe = "demo"
// you can save servicecall here
}
#Then("^Zwei$")
public void zwei() throws Throwable {
System.out.println(getScenarioContext().getScenario().getName());
System.out.println(getScenarioContext().shareMe);
// you can use last service call here
}
#Configuration
#ComponentScan(basePackages = "i.am.the.greatest.company.cucumber")
public class CucumberConfiguration {
}
the scope class
import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.Map;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.ObjectFactory;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.config.Scope;
public class ScenarioScope implements Scope {
private Map<String, Object> objectMap = Collections.synchronizedMap(new HashMap<String, Object>());
/** (non-Javadoc)
* #see org.springframework.beans.factory.config.Scope#get(java.lang.String, org.springframework.beans.factory.ObjectFactory)
*/
public Object get(String name, ObjectFactory<?> objectFactory) {
if (!objectMap.containsKey(name)) {
objectMap.put(name, objectFactory.getObject());
}
return objectMap.get(name);
}
/** (non-Javadoc)
* #see org.springframework.beans.factory.config.Scope#remove(java.lang.String)
*/
public Object remove(String name) {
return objectMap.remove(name);
}
/** (non-Javadoc)
* #see org.springframework.beans.factory.config.Scope#registerDestructionCallback(java.lang.String, java.lang.Runnable)
*/
public void registerDestructionCallback(String name, Runnable callback) {
// do nothing
}
/** (non-Javadoc)
* #see org.springframework.beans.factory.config.Scope#resolveContextualObject(java.lang.String)
*/
public Object resolveContextualObject(String key) {
return null;
}
/** (non-Javadoc)
* #see org.springframework.beans.factory.config.Scope#getConversationId()
*/
public String getConversationId() {
return "VolatileScope";
}
/**
* vaporize the beans
*/
public void vaporize() {
objectMap.clear();
}
}

Other option is to use ThreadLocal storage. Create a context map and add them to the map. Cucumber JVM runs all the steps in the same thread and you have access to that across all the steps. To make it easier, you can instantiate the storage in before hook and clear in after hook.

If you are using Serenity framework with cucumber you can use current session.
Serenity.getCurrentSession()
more about this feature in http://thucydides-webtests.com/2012/02/22/managing-state-between-steps/. (Serenity was called Thucydides before)