Related
We are maintaining a project which currently run on java 8. Now we have to call a partner server through their api to migrate some data into our database.
When we call their server, we got an exception:
Caused by: org.apache.http.ProtocolException: The server failed to respond with a valid HTTP response
Response code in this case is -1.
So i try to use curl to get data from their server, i saw that their response status line is:
HTTP/2 200
While HttpURLConnection check like this:
if (statusLine.startsWith("HTTP/1.")) {
int codePos = statusLine.indexOf(' ');
if (codePos > 0) {
int phrasePos = statusLine.indexOf(' ', codePos+1);
if (phrasePos > 0 && phrasePos < statusLine.length()) {
responseMessage = statusLine.substring(phrasePos+1);
}
// deviation from RFC 2616 - don't reject status line
// if SP Reason-Phrase is not included.
if (phrasePos < 0)
phrasePos = statusLine.length();
try {
responseCode = Integer.parseInt
(statusLine.substring(codePos+1, phrasePos));
return responseCode;
} catch (NumberFormatException e) { }
}
}
return -1;
Because status line here is 2, not 1., it fail to read and parse response from server.
But we can't just upgrade our Java to higher version as it will require a lot of testing to make sure nothing break, anyone know to fix this in java 8?
Can you make use of HttpClient 5.0 ? This supports HTTP/2 on Java 7 and above (note that I'm somewhat surprised that your partner service doesn't support a downgrade to HTTP/1.x in some form?)
I have written an application on Android which realises sending simply requests (using Volley) to the server. The server is stood up on the NodeMCU (ESP8266) microcontroller, written in Lua. The problem is, that after sending the request, application not always is able to print the response. If the address is e.g. "http://www.google.com" it correctly sends request and receive and display response, but if it is the address from the code below - it correctly sends request (the server reacts) but does not (?) receive response (does not display it, displays: "That didn't work!"). Do you have any ideas, how can I fix it and be able to print the response?
Android (part responsible for sending requests):
buttonSynchro.setOnClickListener(new View.OnClickListener() {
#Override
public void onClick(View view) {
// Instantiate the RequestQueue.
String url = "http://192.168.1.12/";
// Request a string response from the provided URL.
StringRequest stringRequest = new StringRequest(Request.Method.GET, url,
new Response.Listener<String>() {
#Override
public void onResponse(String response) {
// Display the first 500 characters of the response string.
testTextView.setText("Response is: "+ response.substring(0,500));
}
}, new Response.ErrorListener() {
#Override
public void onErrorResponse(VolleyError error) {
testTextView.setText("That didn't work!");
}
});
// Add the request to the RequestQueue.
RequestQueue queue = Volley.newRequestQueue(SettingsActivity.this);
queue.add(stringRequest);
}
});
NodeMCU, Lua:
station_cfg={}
station_cfg.ssid="Dom"
station_cfg.pwd="lalala"
wifi.sta.config(station_cfg)
function receive(conn, request)
print(request)
print()
local buf = "";
buf = buf.."<!doctype html><html>";
buf = buf.."<h1> ESP8266 Web Server</h1>";
buf = buf.."</html>";
conn:send(buf);
conn:on("sent", function(sck) sck:close() end);
collectgarbage();
end
function connection(conn)
conn:on("receive", receive)
end
srv=net.createServer(net.TCP, 30)
srv:listen(80, connection)
The code by nPn works in some user agents (Chrome/Firfox/curl/wget on macOS) but not in others (Safari on macOS & iOS, Firefox Klar on iOS). That likely is due to missing HTTP headers.
I advise you stick to the example we have in our documentation at https://nodemcu.readthedocs.io/en/latest/en/modules/net/#netsocketsend.
srv = net.createServer(net.TCP)
function receiver(sck, data)
print(data)
print()
-- if you're sending back HTML over HTTP you'll want something like this instead
local response = {"HTTP/1.0 200 OK\r\nServer: NodeMCU on ESP8266\r\nContent-Type: text/html\r\n\r\n"}
response[#response + 1] = "<!doctype html><html>"
response[#response + 1] = "<h1> ESP8266 Web Server</h1>"
response[#response + 1] = "</html>"
-- sends and removes the first element from the 'response' table
local function send(localSocket)
if #response > 0 then
localSocket:send(table.remove(response, 1))
else
localSocket:close()
response = nil
end
end
-- triggers the send() function again once the first chunk of data was sent
sck:on("sent", send)
send(sck)
end
srv:listen(80, function(conn)
conn:on("receive", receiver)
end)
Also, your code (and nPn's for that matter) makes assumptions about WiFi being available where it shouldn't.
wifi.sta.config(station_cfg) (with auto-connect=true) and wifi.stat.connect are asynchronous and thus non-blocking - as are many other NodeMCU APIs. Hence, you should put the above code into a function and only call it once the device is connected to the AP and got an IP. You do that by e.g. registering a callback for the STA_GOT_IP event with the WiFi event monitor. You'll find a very elaborate example of a boot sequence that listens to all WiFi events at https://nodemcu.readthedocs.io/en/latest/en/upload/#initlua. For starters you may want to trim this and only listen for got-IP.
Based on your comment above and the link you posted showing the traceback, your android app is crashing in the onResponse() method because you are asking for a substring longer than the actual string length.
You can fix this in a number of ways, but one would be to make the ending index be the minimum of the length of the response and 500 (which I assume is the max you can take in your TextView?). You can try changing
testTextView.setText("Response is: "+ response.substring(0,500));
to
testTextView.setText("Response is: "+ response.substring(0, Math.min(response.length(), n)));
or whatever other way you think is more appropriate to limit the length of the response that does not cause the IndexOutOfBoundsException
See the substring method here
public String substring(int beginIndex,
int endIndex)
Returns a new string that is a substring of this string. The substring
begins at the specified beginIndex and extends to the character at
index endIndex - 1. Thus the length of the substring is
endIndex-beginIndex.
Examples:
"hamburger".substring(4, 8) returns "urge"
"smiles".substring(1, 5) returns "mile"
Parameters:
beginIndex - the beginning index, inclusive.
endIndex - the ending index, exclusive. Returns:
the specified substring. Throws:
IndexOutOfBoundsException - if the beginIndex is negative, or endIndex is larger than the length of this String object, or
beginIndex is larger than endIndex.
I am not a Lua expert, but I think you are registering your "sent" callback after you send the response.
I think you should move it into the connection function:
station_cfg={}
station_cfg.ssid="Dom"
station_cfg.pwd="lalala"
wifi.sta.config(station_cfg)
function receive(conn, request)
print(request)
print()
local buf = "";
buf = buf.."<!doctype html><html>";
buf = buf.."<h1> ESP8266 Web Server</h1>";
buf = buf.."</html>";
conn:send(buf);
collectgarbage();
end
function connection(conn)
conn:on("receive", receive)
conn:on("sent", function(sck) sck:close() end);
end
srv=net.createServer(net.TCP, 30)
srv:listen(80, connection)
I have a GCM-backend Java server and I'm trying to send to all users a notification msg. Is my approach right? To just split them into 1000 each time before giving the send request? Or is there a better approach?
public void sendMessage(#Named("message") String message) throws IOException {
int count = ofy().load().type(RegistrationRecord.class).count();
if(count<=1000) {
List<RegistrationRecord> records = ofy().load().type(RegistrationRecord.class).limit(count).list();
sendMsg(records,message);
}else
{
int msgsDone=0;
List<RegistrationRecord> records = ofy().load().type(RegistrationRecord.class).list();
do {
List<RegistrationRecord> regIdsParts = regIdTrim(records, msgsDone);
msgsDone+=1000;
sendMsg(regIdsParts,message);
}while(msgsDone<count);
}
}
The regIdTrim method
private List<RegistrationRecord> regIdTrim(List<RegistrationRecord> wholeList, final int start) {
List<RegistrationRecord> parts = wholeList.subList(start,(start+1000)> wholeList.size()? wholeList.size() : start+1000);
return parts;
}
The sendMsg method
private void sendMsg(List<RegistrationRecord> records,#Named("message") String message) throws IOException {
if (message == null || message.trim().length() == 0) {
log.warning("Not sending message because it is empty");
return;
}
Sender sender = new Sender(API_KEY);
Message msg = new Message.Builder().addData("message", message).build();
// crop longer messages
if (message.length() > 1000) {
message = message.substring(0, 1000) + "[...]";
}
for (RegistrationRecord record : records) {
Result result = sender.send(msg, record.getRegId(), 5);
if (result.getMessageId() != null) {
log.info("Message sent to " + record.getRegId());
String canonicalRegId = result.getCanonicalRegistrationId();
if (canonicalRegId != null) {
// if the regId changed, we have to update the datastore
log.info("Registration Id changed for " + record.getRegId() + " updating to " + canonicalRegId);
record.setRegId(canonicalRegId);
ofy().save().entity(record).now();
}
} else {
String error = result.getErrorCodeName();
if (error.equals(Constants.ERROR_NOT_REGISTERED)) {
log.warning("Registration Id " + record.getRegId() + " no longer registered with GCM, removing from datastore");
// if the device is no longer registered with Gcm, remove it from the datastore
ofy().delete().entity(record).now();
} else {
log.warning("Error when sending message : " + error);
}
}
}
}
Quoting from Google Docs:
GCM is support for up to 1,000 recipients for a single message. This capability makes it much easier to send out important messages to your entire user base. For instance, let's say you had a message that needed to be sent to 1,000,000 of your users, and your server could handle sending out about 500 messages per second. If you send each message with only a single recipient, it would take 1,000,000/500 = 2,000 seconds, or around half an hour. However, attaching 1,000 recipients to each message, the total time required to send a message out to 1,000,000 recipients becomes (1,000,000/1,000) / 500 = 2 seconds. This is not only useful, but important for timely data, such as natural disaster alerts or sports scores, where a 30 minute interval might render the information useless.
Taking advantage of this functionality is easy. If you're using the GCM helper library for Java, simply provide a List collection of registration IDs to the send or sendNoRetry method, instead of a single registration ID.
We can not send more than 1000 push notification at time.I searched a lot but not result then i did this with same approach split whole list in sub lists of 1000 items and send push notification.
I want to constract a telephone-caller inside my java application. For this pupose I used a JAIN-SIP library. After the first INVITE the system needs Proxy-Authentication. The second invite is conscructed with the help of "AuthenticationHelperImpl.class":https://gitorious.org/0xdroid/external_nist-sip/source/1e0f37693341071f316852c8e05a08deef2b7fc4:java/gov/nist/javax/sip/clientauthutils/AuthenticationHelperImpl.java#L311, includes Proxy-Authentication header and lloks like:
INVITE sip:+11111111111#fpbx.de;maddr=fpbx.de SIP/2.0
Call-ID: 1c609509a43b721ab11c396c1e6ea9e7#192.168.17.107
CSeq: 2 INVITE
From: "77735hk6iu" <sip:77735hk6iu#fpbx.de>
To: "+111111111111111" <sip:+11111111111#fpbx.de>
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.17.107:34567;rport;branch=z9hG4bK-383337-5bc4fd6b7a616843fce9eaa243bcb10e
Max-Forwards: 70
Contact: <sip:77735hk6iu#192.168.17.107:5060>
Content-Type: application/sdp
Proxy-Authorization: Digest username="77735hk6iu",realm="fpbx.de",nonce="VLaIxVS2h5muPS30F2zLdXHjup6ELyen",uri="sip:+111111111111#fpbx.de:5060;maddr=fpbx.de",response="47ea578c6b01c99fd3ed2b41c60983df"
Content-Length: 61
v=0
o=- 130565705777141827 1 IN IP4 192.168.17.107
s=call
After that I receive at the beginning code 100 message ("your call is very important for us") followed with 408 code message ("Request Timeout").
What I did to imporve the situation:
tried different phone number formats: 004930208488480,
04930208488480, 049, 0049, sdfhajfkhsk. For all these numbers I
become the same combination on messages.
tried to use port in request uri
tried to remove maddr from request uri.
tried to fullfill the message body with codek settings.
to set and remove rport from via header
If you now what I'm doing wrong, please, help me.
Thank you in advance.
I think, Maybe your Proxy-Authorization header is wrong. Maybe you is miscalculated. I wanted to share my resolve.
authUser is your phoneNumber. (for example: 77735hk6iu )
authPass is your user's password.
msg is your invite request.(Headers !)
AccountManagerImpl accountManagerImp = new AccountManagerImpl(authUser, AuthPass);
AuthenticationHelperImpl authenticationHelperImpl = new AuthenticationHelperImpl(accountManagerImp);
try {
this.authentication = authenticationHelperImpl.handleChallenge(msg, (SIPClientTransaction)trans);
AuthenticationHelperImple.java Class :
public AuthorizationHeader handleChallenge(Response challenge, ClientTransaction challengedTransaction) throws SipException {
SIPRequest challengedRequest = ((SIPRequest) challengedTransaction.getRequest());
ListIterator authHeaders = null;
if (challenge.getStatusCode() == Response.UNAUTHORIZED) {
authHeaders = challenge.getHeaders(WWWAuthenticateHeader.NAME);
}
else {
if (challenge.getStatusCode() == Response.PROXY_AUTHENTICATION_REQUIRED) {
authHeaders = challenge.getHeaders(ProxyAuthenticateHeader.NAME);
}
else {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Unexpected status code ");
}
}
if (authHeaders == null) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Could not find WWWAuthenticate or ProxyAuthenticate headers");
}
WWWAuthenticateHeader authHeader = null;
while (authHeaders.hasNext()) {
authHeader = (WWWAuthenticateHeader) authHeaders.next();
String realm = authHeader.getRealm();
this.uri = challengedRequest.getRequestURI();
this.requestMethod = challengedRequest.getMethod();
this.requestBody = (challengedRequest.getContent() == null) ? "" : new String(challengedRequest.getRawContent());
if (this.accountManager instanceof SecureAccountManager) {
UserCredentialHash credHash = ((SecureAccountManager) this.accountManager).getCredentialHash(challengedTransaction,
realm);
if (credHash == null) {
logger.logDebug("Could not find creds");
throw new SipException("Cannot find user creds for the given user name and realm");
}
this.authorizationHeader = this.getAuthorization(requestMethod, uri.toString(), requestBody, authHeader, credHash);
}
else {
UserCredentials userCreds = ((AccountManager) this.accountManager).getCredentials(challengedTransaction, realm);
if (userCreds == null) {
throw new SipException("Cannot find user creds for the given user name and realm");
}
// sipDomain = userCreds.getSipDomain();
// we haven't yet authenticated this realm since we were
// started.
this.authorizationHeader = this.getAuthorization(requestMethod, uri.toString(), requestBody, authHeader, userCreds);
}
}
return this.authorizationHeader;
}
getAuthorization function :
public AuthorizationHeader getAuthorization(String method,
String uri,
String requestBody,
WWWAuthenticateHeader authHeader,
UserCredentials userCredentials) throws SecurityException {
String response = null;
String qopList = authHeader.getQop();
String qop = (qopList != null) ? "auth" : null;
String nc_value = "00000001";
String cnonce = "xyz";
try {
response = MessageDigestAlgorithm.calculateResponse(authHeader.getAlgorithm(),
userCredentials.getUserName(), authHeader.getRealm(),userCredentials.getPassword(), authHeader.getNonce(), nc_value, // JvB added
cnonce, // JvB added
method, uri, requestBody, qop,logger);
}
catch (NullPointerException exc) {
throw new SecurityException("The received authenticate header was malformatted: " + exc.getMessage());
}
AuthorizationHeader authorization = null;
try {
if (authHeader instanceof ProxyAuthenticateHeader) {
if (this.headerFactory != null) {
authorization = headerFactory.createProxyAuthorizationHeader(authHeader.getScheme());
}
else {
authorization = new ProxyAuthorization();
authorization.setScheme(authHeader.getScheme());
}
}
else {
if (this.headerFactory != null) {
authorization = headerFactory.createAuthorizationHeader(authHeader.getScheme());
}
else {
authorization = new Authorization();
authorization.setScheme(authHeader.getScheme());
}
}
authorization.setUsername(userCredentials.getUserName());
authorization.setRealm(authHeader.getRealm());
authorization.setNonce(authHeader.getNonce());
authorization.setParameter("uri", uri);
authorization.setResponse(response);
if (authHeader.getAlgorithm() != null) {
authorization.setAlgorithm(authHeader.getAlgorithm());
}
if (authHeader.getOpaque() != null) {
authorization.setOpaque(authHeader.getOpaque());
}
// jvb added
if (qop != null) {
authorization.setQop(qop);
authorization.setCNonce(cnonce);
authorization.setNonceCount(Integer.parseInt(nc_value));
}
authorization.setResponse(response);
} catch (ParseException ex) {
throw new RuntimeException("Failed to create an authorization header!");
}
return authorization;
}
Finally, your this.authentication variable is ProxyAuthorizationHeader. You must put this.authentication in your INVITE message. And than you will sent SipMessage from transaction or dialog to JAIN-SIP stack.
Good Luck !
The problem was partly solved when a removed "maddr=fpbx.de" from request URI and from proxy-auth. uri
fpr this a used handleCahllenge method with boolean arguments:
inviteTid = authenticationHelper.handleChallenge(response, tid, sipProvider, 15, **true**);
But I still don't know how I can a acchieve sponaneous telephone number.
The 100 message is hop-by-hop, that is to say it just means the next hop got your request. Other messages will typically be end-to-end (so, if you got a 180 Ringing, that typically means the endpoint being called sent the 180). A 408 typically shows up when one of the hops sent the INVITE but never got a response (and your SIP stack might be generating that internally when it doesn't get a provisional response in a reasonable timeframe -- usually about 32 seconds with the default SIP timers).
I don't know your network setup, but there are several private IPs in that message (of the 192.168.x.x variety). If I had to guess, your first hop is sending the 100 back to the IP/port it received it from, but the next response is following the Via headers (as it should), and the hop after you isn't respecting the rport parameter, so the response is getting lost. Alternately, your NAT is poorly configured and is closing the hole it created for the INVITE too quickly.
If you have a proxy on the edge of your network that this message is going out, it is either putting bad Via headers on the message (possibly with the internal IP instead of the external IP) or it is sending the INVITE to the wrong place (causing it to never get a response), and the 408 is coming from it.
Yes, it's a long question with a lot of detail... So, my question is: How can I stream an upload to Vimeo in segments?
For anyone wanting to copy and debug on their own machine: Here are the things you need:
My code here.
Include the Scribe library found here
Have a valid video file (mp4) which is at least greater than 10 MB and put it in the directory C:\test.mp4 or change that code to point wherever yours is.
That's it! Thanks for helping me out!
Big update: I've left a working API Key and Secret for Vimeo in the code here. So as long as you have a Vimeo account, all the code should work just fine for you once you've allowed the application and entered your token. Just copy the code from that link into a project on your favorite IDE and see if you can fix this with me. I'll give the bounty to whoever gives me the working code. Thanks! Oh, and don't expect to use this Key and Secret for long. Once this problem's resolved I'll delete it. :)
Overview of the problem: The problem is when I send the last chunk of bytes to Vimeo and then verify the upload, the response returns that the length of all the content is the length of only the last chunk, not all the chunks combined as it should be.
SSCCE Note: I have my entire SSCCE here. I put it somewhere else so it can be C ompilable. It is NOT very S hort (about 300 lines), but hopefully you find it to be S elf-contained, and it's certainly an E xample!). I am, however, posting the relevant portions of my code in this post.
This is how it works: When you upload a video to Vimeo via the streaming method (see Upload API documentation here for setup to get to this point), you have to give a few headers: endpoint, content-length, and content-type. The documentation says it ignores any other headers. You also give it a payload of the byte information for the file you're uploading. And then sign and send it (I have a method which will do this using scribe).
My problem: Everything works great when I just send the video in one request. My problem is in cases when I'm uploading several bigger files, the computer I'm using doesn't have enough memory to load all of that byte information and put it in the HTTP PUT request, so I have to split it up into 1 MB segments. This is where things get tricky. The documentation mentions that it's possible to "resume" uploads, so I'm trying to do that with my code, but it's not working quite right. Below, you'll see the code for sending the video. Remember my SSCCE is here.
Things I've tried: I'm thinking it has something to do with the Content-Range header... So here are the things I've tried in changing what the Content-Range header says...
Not adding content range header to the first chunk
Adding a prefix to the content range header (each with a combination of the previous header):
"bytes"
"bytes " (throws connection error, see the very bottom for the error) --> It appears in the documentation that this is what they're looking for, but I'm pretty sure there are typos in the documentation because they have the content-range header on their "resume" example as: 1001-339108/339108 when it should be 1001-339107/339108. So... Yeah...
"bytes%20"
"bytes:"
"bytes: "
"bytes="
"bytes= "
Not adding anything as a prefix to the content range header
Here's the code:
/**
* Send the video data
*
* #return whether the video successfully sent
*/
private static boolean sendVideo(String endpoint, File file) throws FileNotFoundException, IOException {
// Setup File
long contentLength = file.length();
String contentLengthString = Long.toString(contentLength);
FileInputStream is = new FileInputStream(file);
int bufferSize = 10485760; // 10 MB = 10485760 bytes
byte[] bytesPortion = new byte[bufferSize];
int byteNumber = 0;
int maxAttempts = 1;
while (is.read(bytesPortion, 0, bufferSize) != -1) {
String contentRange = Integer.toString(byteNumber);
long bytesLeft = contentLength - byteNumber;
System.out.println(newline + newline + "Bytes Left: " + bytesLeft);
if (bytesLeft < bufferSize) {
//copy the bytesPortion array into a smaller array containing only the remaining bytes
bytesPortion = Arrays.copyOf(bytesPortion, (int) bytesLeft);
//This just makes it so it doesn't throw an IndexOutOfBounds exception on the next while iteration. It shouldn't get past another iteration
bufferSize = (int) bytesLeft;
}
byteNumber += bytesPortion.length;
contentRange += "-" + (byteNumber - 1) + "/" + contentLengthString;
int attempts = 0;
boolean success = false;
while (attempts < maxAttempts && !success) {
int bytesOnServer = sendVideoBytes("Test video", endpoint, contentLengthString, "video/mp4", contentRange, bytesPortion, first);
if (bytesOnServer == byteNumber) {
success = true;
} else {
System.out.println(bytesOnServer + " != " + byteNumber);
System.out.println("Success is not true!");
}
attempts++;
}
first = true;
if (!success) {
return false;
}
}
return true;
}
/**
* Sends the given bytes to the given endpoint
*
* #return the last byte on the server (from verifyUpload(endpoint))
*/
private static int sendVideoBytes(String videoTitle, String endpoint, String contentLength, String fileType, String contentRange, byte[] fileBytes, boolean addContentRange) throws FileNotFoundException, IOException {
OAuthRequest request = new OAuthRequest(Verb.PUT, endpoint);
request.addHeader("Content-Length", contentLength);
request.addHeader("Content-Type", fileType);
if (addContentRange) {
request.addHeader("Content-Range", contentRangeHeaderPrefix + contentRange);
}
request.addPayload(fileBytes);
Response response = signAndSendToVimeo(request, "sendVideo on " + videoTitle, false);
if (response.getCode() != 200 && !response.isSuccessful()) {
return -1;
}
return verifyUpload(endpoint);
}
/**
* Verifies the upload and returns whether it's successful
*
* #param endpoint to verify upload to
* #return the last byte on the server
*/
public static int verifyUpload(String endpoint) {
// Verify the upload
OAuthRequest request = new OAuthRequest(Verb.PUT, endpoint);
request.addHeader("Content-Length", "0");
request.addHeader("Content-Range", "bytes */*");
Response response = signAndSendToVimeo(request, "verifyUpload to " + endpoint, true);
if (response.getCode() != 308 || !response.isSuccessful()) {
return -1;
}
String range = response.getHeader("Range");
//range = "bytes=0-10485759"
return Integer.parseInt(range.substring(range.lastIndexOf("-") + 1)) + 1;
//The + 1 at the end is because Vimeo gives you 0-whatever byte where 0 = the first byte
}
Here's the signAndSendToVimeo method:
/**
* Signs the request and sends it. Returns the response.
*
* #param service
* #param accessToken
* #param request
* #return response
*/
public static Response signAndSendToVimeo(OAuthRequest request, String description, boolean printBody) throws org.scribe.exceptions.OAuthException {
System.out.println(newline + newline
+ "Signing " + description + " request:"
+ ((printBody && !request.getBodyContents().isEmpty()) ? newline + "\tBody Contents:" + request.getBodyContents() : "")
+ ((!request.getHeaders().isEmpty()) ? newline + "\tHeaders: " + request.getHeaders() : ""));
service.signRequest(accessToken, request);
printRequest(request, description);
Response response = request.send();
printResponse(response, description, printBody);
return response;
}
And here's some (an example... All of the output can be found here) of the output from the printRequest and printResponse methods: NOTE This output changes depending on what the contentRangeHeaderPrefix is set to and the first boolean is set to (which specifies whether or not to include the Content-Range header on the first chunk).
We're sending the video for upload!
Bytes Left: 15125120
Signing sendVideo on Test video request:
Headers: {Content-Length=15125120, Content-Type=video/mp4, Content-Range=bytes%200-10485759/15125120}
sendVideo on Test video >>> Request
Headers: {Authorization=OAuth oauth_signature="zUdkaaoJyvz%2Bt6zoMvAFvX0DRkc%3D", oauth_version="1.0", oauth_nonce="340477132", oauth_signature_method="HMAC-SHA1", oauth_consumer_key="5cb447d1fc4c3308e2c6531e45bcadf1", oauth_token="460633205c55d3f1806bcab04174ae09", oauth_timestamp="1334336004", Content-Length=15125120, Content-Type=video/mp4, Content-Range=bytes: 0-10485759/15125120}
Verb: PUT
Complete URL: http://174.129.125.96:8080/upload?ticket_id=5ea64d64547e38e5e3c121852b2d306d
sendVideo on Test video >>> Response
Code: 200
Headers: {null=HTTP/1.1 200 OK, Content-Length=0, Connection=close, Content-Type=text/plain, Server=Vimeo/1.0}
Signing verifyUpload to http://174.129.125.96:8080/upload?ticket_id=5ea64d64547e38e5e3c121852b2d306d request:
Headers: {Content-Length=0, Content-Range=bytes */*}
verifyUpload to http://174.129.125.96:8080/upload?ticket_id=5ea64d64547e38e5e3c121852b2d306d >>> Request
Headers: {Authorization=OAuth oauth_signature="FQg8HJe84nrUTdyvMJGM37dpNpI%3D", oauth_version="1.0", oauth_nonce="298157825", oauth_signature_method="HMAC-SHA1", oauth_consumer_key="5cb447d1fc4c3308e2c6531e45bcadf1", oauth_token="460633205c55d3f1806bcab04174ae09", oauth_timestamp="1334336015", Content-Length=0, Content-Range=bytes */*}
Verb: PUT
Complete URL: http://174.129.125.96:8080/upload?ticket_id=5ea64d64547e38e5e3c121852b2d306d
verifyUpload to http://174.129.125.96:8080/upload?ticket_id=5ea64d64547e38e5e3c121852b2d306d >>> Response
Code: 308
Headers: {null=HTTP/1.1 308 Resume Incomplete, Range=bytes=0-10485759, Content-Length=0, Connection=close, Content-Type=text/plain, Server=Vimeo/1.0}
Body:
Bytes Left: 4639360
Signing sendVideo on Test video request:
Headers: {Content-Length=15125120, Content-Type=video/mp4, Content-Range=bytes: 10485760-15125119/15125120}
sendVideo on Test video >>> Request
Headers: {Authorization=OAuth oauth_signature="qspQBu42HVhQ7sDpzKGeu3%2Bn8tM%3D", oauth_version="1.0", oauth_nonce="183131870", oauth_signature_method="HMAC-SHA1", oauth_consumer_key="5cb447d1fc4c3308e2c6531e45bcadf1", oauth_token="460633205c55d3f1806bcab04174ae09", oauth_timestamp="1334336015", Content-Length=15125120, Content-Type=video/mp4, Content-Range=bytes%2010485760-15125119/15125120}
Verb: PUT
Complete URL: http://174.129.125.96:8080/upload?ticket_id=5ea64d64547e38e5e3c121852b2d306d
sendVideo on Test video >>> Response
Code: 200
Headers: {null=HTTP/1.1 200 OK, Content-Length=0, Connection=close, Content-Type=text/plain, Server=Vimeo/1.0}
Signing verifyUpload to http://174.129.125.96:8080/upload?ticket_id=5ea64d64547e38e5e3c121852b2d306d request:
Headers: {Content-Length=0, Content-Range=bytes */*}
verifyUpload to http://174.129.125.96:8080/upload?ticket_id=5ea64d64547e38e5e3c121852b2d306d >>> Request
Headers: {Authorization=OAuth oauth_signature="IdhhhBryzCa5eYqSPKAQfnVFpIg%3D", oauth_version="1.0", oauth_nonce="442087608", oauth_signature_method="HMAC-SHA1", oauth_consumer_key="5cb447d1fc4c3308e2c6531e45bcadf1", oauth_token="460633205c55d3f1806bcab04174ae09", oauth_timestamp="1334336020", Content-Length=0, Content-Range=bytes */*}
Verb: PUT
Complete URL: http://174.129.125.96:8080/upload?ticket_id=5ea64d64547e38e5e3c121852b2d306d
4639359 != 15125120
verifyUpload to http://174.129.125.96:8080/upload?ticket_id=5ea64d64547e38e5e3c121852b2d306d >>> Response
Success is not true!
Code: 308
Headers: {null=HTTP/1.1 308 Resume Incomplete, Range=bytes=0-4639359, Content-Length=0, Connection=close, Content-Type=text/plain, Server=Vimeo/1.0}
Body:
Then the code goes on to complete the upload and set video information (you can see that in my full code).
Edit 2: Tried removing the "%20" from the content-range and received this error making connection. I must use either "bytes%20" or not add "bytes" at all...
Exception in thread "main" org.scribe.exceptions.OAuthException: Problems while creating connection.
at org.scribe.model.Request.send(Request.java:70)
at org.scribe.model.OAuthRequest.send(OAuthRequest.java:12)
at autouploadermodel.VimeoTest.signAndSendToVimeo(VimeoTest.java:282)
at autouploadermodel.VimeoTest.sendVideoBytes(VimeoTest.java:130)
at autouploadermodel.VimeoTest.sendVideo(VimeoTest.java:105)
at autouploadermodel.VimeoTest.main(VimeoTest.java:62)
Caused by: java.io.IOException: Error writing to server
at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.writeRequests(HttpURLConnection.java:622)
at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.writeRequests(HttpURLConnection.java:634)
at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.getInputStream(HttpURLConnection.java:1317)
at java.net.HttpURLConnection.getResponseCode(HttpURLConnection.java:468)
at org.scribe.model.Response.<init>(Response.java:28)
at org.scribe.model.Request.doSend(Request.java:110)
at org.scribe.model.Request.send(Request.java:62)
... 5 more
Java Result: 1
Edit 1: Updated the code and output. Still need help!
I think your problem could simply be the result of this line:
request.addHeader("Content-Range", "bytes%20" + contentRange);
Try and replace "bytes%20" by simply "bytes "
In your output you see the corresponding header has incorrect content:
Headers: {
Content-Length=15125120,
Content-Type=video/mp4,
Content-Range=bytes%200-10485759/15125120 <-- INCORRECT
}
On the topic of Content-Range...
You're right that an example final block of content should have a range like 14680064-15125119/15125120. That's part of the HTTP 1.1 spec.
Here
String contentRange = Integer.toString(byteNumber + 1);
you start from 1 and not from 0 at the first iteration.
Here
request.addHeader("Content-Length", contentLength);
you put the entire file content length and not the length of the current chunk.
The vimeo API page says:
"The final step is to call vimeo.videos.upload.complete to queue up the video for transcoding. This call will return the video_id, which you can then use in other calls (to set the title, description, privacy, etc.). If you do not call this method, the video will not be processed."
I added this bit of code to the end and got it to work:
request = new OAuthRequest(Verb.PUT, "http://vimeo.com/api/rest/v2");
request.addQuerystringParameter("method", "vimeo.videos.upload.complete");
request.addQuerystringParameter("filename", video.getName());
request.addQuerystringParameter("ticket_id", ticket);
service.signRequest(token, request);
response = request.send();
Check this :
String contentRange="bytes "+lastBytesSend+"-"+ ((totalSize - lastBytesSend)-1)+"/"+totalSize ;
request.addHeader("Content-Range",contentRange);